© 2010 mcgraw hill ryerson 12-1 compensation third canadian edition milkovich, newman, cole
TRANSCRIPT
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-1
COMPENSATIONThird Canadian Edition
Milkovich, Newman, Cole
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-2
STRATEGICPOLICIES
TECHNIQUES STRATEGICOBJECTIVES
EFFICIENCY
Performance
Quality
Customers
Stockholders Costs
FAIRNESS
COMPLIANCE
ALIGNMENTALIGNMENT
COMPETITIVENESSCOMPETITIVENESS
CONTRIBUTORSCONTRIBUTORS
MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT
INTERNAL STRUCTURE
PAY
STRUCTURE
INCENTIVE
PROGRAMS
EVALUATION
THE PAY MODEL
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-3
Government as Part of the Employment Relationship
government is a key stakeholder in compensation decision making.
governments’ usual interests are whether: procedures for determining pay are fair (pay
discrimination)safety nets for the unemployed and
disadvantaged are sufficient (minimum wage, employment insurance)
employees are protected from exploitation (human rights, pay equity)
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-4
Employment Standards Acts
minimum wage paid vacation paid holidays standard hours of work and overtime pay pay on termination of employment minimum age of employment equal pay for equal work by men and
women
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-5
Human Rights Laws
based on Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms in Canadian Constitution
equal treatment in employment and opportunity for employment regardless of race, colour, religion, sex…
prohibit harassment in the workplace
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-6
Pay Equity
issue relating to the gender wage gap gender wage gap is the amount by
which the average pay for female workers is less than the average pay for male workers
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-7
Reasons for Gender Wage Gap
differences in occupational attainment; women historically segregated in small number of occupations e.g., sales, nursing
differences in number of hours worked differences in industries and firms differences in union membership presence of discrimination
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-8
Pay Equity Legislation intended to redress the portion of the wage gap
assumed to be due to discrimination, through comparison of male- and female-dominated jobs
four job evaluation factors required: Skill Effort Responsibility working conditions
compare male and female job classes: job to job method proportional value/wage line method proxy comparison method
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-9
The Impact of Unions in Wage Determination
impact on general wage and benefit levels
impact on the structure of wage packages
impact on non-union firms (spillover)
impact on wage and salary policies and practices in unionized firms
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-10
Union Impact on General Wage Levels
union workers earn about 10 percent more than non-union workers
size of the gap varies from year to year union impact higher during periods of
higher unemployment and slow economy union impact smaller during strong
economy
union benefits 20 to 30 percent higher than non-union
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-11
Union Impact on Structure of Wage Packages
Division between wages and benefitsUnion benefits 20 to 30 percent
higher than non-union
Two-tier wage plans Lower wages for lower seniority
workers
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-12
Union Impact: The Spillover Effect
employers seek to avoid unionization by offering workers the wages, benefits, and working conditions won in rival unionized firms e.g., Dofasco
non-union management continues to enjoy the freedom from union “interference” in decision making
non-union workers receive the “spillover” of rewards obtained by unionized counterparts
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-13
Role of Unions in Pay Policies and Practices
collective agreement/contract specifies:basis of pay (regular, overtime)occupation - wage differentialsexperience / merit differentialsvacations and holidayswage adjustment provisions (COLA)
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-14
Unions and Alternative Reward Systems
some collective agreements include alternative rewards:lump sum awardspiece rates gain-sharingprofit sharingpay-for-knowledge (skill/competency-
based pay)
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson
12-15
Conclusion
governments assess fairness and legislate employment standards, human rights, and pay equity rules that affect compensation management
unions affect compensation management directly through collective agreements, and are facing the need to adjust compensation due to international competition