報告者:蕭鈺 指導 老師 :倪春發 老師 2010/12/16
DESCRIPTION
F ield e vidence of p ore p ressure d iffusion in c layey s oils p rone to l andsliding Berti, M., Simoni, A., 2010 Journal of Geophysical Research, 115,. 報告者:蕭鈺 指導 老師 :倪春發 老師 2010/12/16. Outline. 1. Introduction 2. Rocca Pitigliana Test Site 3. Monitoring System - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Field Evidence of Pore Pressure Diffusion in Clayey Soils Prone
to LandslidingBERTI, M., SIMONI, A., 2010
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 115,
報告者:蕭鈺指導老師:倪春發 老師
2010/12/16
OUTLINE
1. Introduction
2. Rocca Pitigliana Test Site
3. Monitoring System
4. Hydrologic Modeling
5. Results and Discussion
6. Conclusions
INTRODUCTION
1. [Dhakal and Sidle, 2004; Iverson, 2000;Rosso et al., 2006; Montgomery and Dietrich , 1994] developed simple, explicit equations with few input parameters
2. [Iverson and Major 1987] first proposed
that a simple model for vertical diffusive propagation can be used to interpret the wet‐season groundwater response in a large earth flow body.
3. [ Baum and Reid 1995] discovered that surface infiltration can saturate the landslide body in just a few days,and that the saturated soil responds rapidly to heavy rainfall.
1. To illustrate the hydrologic behavior of weathered
clayey soils overlying a clay‐shale bedrock.
2. To evaluate the capability of the one‐dimensional (1‐D) linear‐diffusion model.
3. To compare the calibrated hydraulic parameters
with those measured by field and laboratory tests.
4. To compare the performance of linear‐diffusion and different models
ROCCA PITIGLIANA TEST SITE
MONITORING SYSTEM
HYDROLOGIC MODELING
Hydraulic Parameters of the Soil
D : hydraulic diffusivity
K : hydraulic conductivity
C : specific moisture capacity
ψ : pressure head
Saturated Aquifer
2
D =K L
C T
0 0/satD K C
6 7
2 30
4 5 2
10 ~ 10
10 ~ 10 1
5 10 ~ 10
sat
MAX
K m s
C m
D m s
Linear‐Diffusion Model
ψ : pressure head
D0 : Saturated hydraulic diffusivity
α : slope angle
22
0 2=D cos
t Z
RESULTS and DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
1. The pressure waves advance vertically downward through the fully saturated soil at high speed (the
observed velocity is 200 times greater than the
advective front velocity) and become slower and smoother with depth.
2. The short‐term behavior of the clay cover can be well reproduced using the 1‐D linear‐diffusion model proposed by Iverson [2000].
The model loses its predictive capabilities when applied outside its validity domain or when surface ponding occurs
3. The utility of a linear‐diffusion model in the framework of areal slope stability assessment is rather limited.
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION