© 2012. all rights reserved. front range roundtable about the front range roundtable november 30,...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
About the Front Range RoundtableNovember 30, 2012
Facilitated by:
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
VisionRound-table
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
32 47 17 9 33114
52
619
49 35 41
215
27
150
51 44
161238
Colorado’s Fire SeasonsThousands of acres of wildfire per year (Total = 1.9 million acres of wildfire since 1995)
Sources: 1995 – 2010: Rocky Mountain Area and Coordination Center Annual Activity Report (2001-2004); Wildland Fire Activity by Cause, Combining Federal and Non-federal Agencies Within Each State (www.fs.fed.us/r2/fire/oo_annual_report.pdf); 2011 – 2012: http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_statistics.html
Includes Hayman fire:$200 million of costs from
the Hayman Fire alone, which accounted for one-
fifth of all acres burned that year (138k acres)
Includes Buffalo Creek fire: 12k
acres
Includes Bobcat Gulch fire: 11k
acres Includes Fourmile fire: 6k acres
Five years of implementation
FRFTP formed
2
Includes Waldo (18k acres) and High Park (87k
acres)
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
Front Range Forests
3
• 4.2 million acres of forest in the Front Range
•1.4 million in need of ecological restoration and fire risk mitigation
“Lower Montane”: Dry Ponderosa pine and Dry Douglas fir
“Upper Montane”: Mesic Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer
“Subalpine”: Lodgepole Pine and Spruce Fir
3
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
Definitions of Front Range life zones
1 Elevations noted are rough estimates – actual elevation limits depend on latitude, aspect, and other local factors; elevations generally lower in northern Front Range and on north-facing slopes, higher in southern Front Range and on south-facing slopes (e.g., Upper limit of Lower Montane ~7,500’ in Larimer vs. ~8,500’ in El Paso)2 May include: Ponderosa Pine, Douglas-fir (up to ~8,000’), Aspen, Blue Spruce, Limber Pine, Engelmann Spruce, Sub-alpine FirNote: Riparian zones are included and considered in each life zone in which they are found
General elevations1
>~11,500’
~9,000-9,500’ to ~11,500’
~8,000’ to ~9,000-9,500’
~6,000’ to ~8,000’
~5,500’ to ~6,000’
Sub-alpine
Upper Montane
Lower Montane
Lower Ecotone
Alpine
Dominant overstory composition
Associated vegetation types
• Mountain-mahogany• Scrub Oak
• No trees
• Lodgepole Pine• Spruce/Fir
• Mesic Ponderosa Pine
• Mesic Mixed Conifer2
• Dry Ponderosa Pine
• Dry Douglas-fir
• Transition to Ponderosa Pine
• Grassland• Mountain-mahogany• Scrub Oak
• Some permanent meadows
Front Range life zones
• Grassy slopes and boulder fields
• Sedges, mat and cushion plants, dwarf willows
• Bogs, meadows, ponds, rich in wildflowers
Example communities
• None
• Winter Park• Ward
• Boulder• Golden
• Evergreen• Monument
• Estes Park• Granby
4
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
The Lower Montane is the Roundtable’s highest priority ecosystem for landscape-scale ecological restoration.
1 Elevations noted are rough estimates – actual elevation limits depend on latitude, aspect, and other local factors2 Historical Range of Variability in terms of vegetation characteristics; fuel composition; fire frequency, severity and pattern; and other associated disturbances
General elevations1
>~11,500’
~9,000-9,500’ to ~11,500’
~8,000’ to ~9,000-9,500’
~6,000’ to ~8,000’
~5,500’ to ~6,000’
Sub-alpine
Upper Montane
Lower Montane
Lower Ecotone
Alpine
High
Mixed
Low
Difference from HRV2?
Risk of ignition / fire
spreadHRV2 well
understood?Front Range ecosystems
5
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable 6
Historical photos show how forest treatments in the Lower Montane restore forest structures
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
7
Forest Restoration = Fire Risk Reduction in the Lower Montane
Source: Map by the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest and Pawnee Buttes National Grassland; Photos by John Bustos, a public affairs officer for the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest and Pawnee Buttes National Grassland in Fort Collins, CO.
• Began Labor Day, September 6, 2010• Estimated $217 million in personal property
losses and damages: fire destroyed 169 homes. • “Without past mitigation activities, the outcome
could have been worse.”
Bald Mountain
Fourmile Canyon Fire, 2010
7
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
• 4.2 million acres of forests6 (53% of all land types7) including 2 million acres of habitat for 31 species of concern5
• 80% of Front Range forests have recreation opportunities5 attracting some of Colorado’s 28 million overnight visitors spending $10 billion annually, making tourism the second- highest employment sector in the state, with 143,000 jobs3
• $5 million per year of available biomass from forest treatments12
• 1,246 essential water supply infrastructures (intakes4, reservoirs, transbasin diversions)
• 4.2 million acres of forest watersheds important for drinking water (65% at risk for post-fire erosion)5
• 1,775 miles of roads8
• 1,573 miles of transmission lines
• 664 miles of gas pipeline9
• 122 communications towers10
1. Federal Register (as of January 4, 2001)2. 2005 Census (ESRI)3. SERGoM (Spatially Explicit Regional Growth Model)
version `12 June 2008 (Theobald) 100m
Front Range Lives and Resources Remain at Risk
People
• 881 communities1
• 2 million people (more than 40% of Colorado’s population)2
• More than 700,000 homes3
Water and safetyNatural and economic resources
4. CDPHE, 20095. Colorado State Forest Service and The Nature
Conservancy. 2009. Colorado Statewide Forest Assessment (in preparation).
6. LANDFIRE, 2006 (Includes PJ and shrubs)
11. “State spending on tourism a hot potato for lawmakers,” Rocky Mountain News, January 12, 2009.
12. 166,000 bdt/y (Jefferson County Biomass Facility Feasibility Study, McNeil Technologies Inc , January 2005 ) * $30
7. ESRI, 20078. TIGER: USCB. 20069. Ventyx, December 200910. FAA, 2009
8
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
The Front Range Roundtable
Overlap of goals
Fire Risk Mitigation Goals
Ecological Restoration Goals
~400,000 acres
~400,000 acres
~700,000 acres
The Front Range roundtable has reached consensus that 1.5 million acres of Front Range forests require treatments to reduce fire risk and/or achieve ecological restoration.
Vision
The Front Range Roundtable was formed to “serve as a focal point for diverse stakeholder input into efforts to reduce wildland fire risks and improve forest health through sustained fuels treatment along the Colorado Front Range.”
Mission
9
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
Source: Map by USFS-ARP
2009 Map of Priorities: Accomplishments vs. 2006 Recommendations
Notes on methods
1.Data collected back to 2004 to our best available knowledge (received for treated acres separately from planned acres as shown)
2.Excludes private land treated without the assistance of the CSFS
3.Excludes county lands treated in Park, Teller, Douglas, El Paso, and Grand.
4.Some of these areas have been treated with prescribed or natural burn and may not require additional near-term treatment. Some of these areas have been treated mechanically but still require prescribed or natural burn to achieve restoration.
5.Different databases are used between units/agencies. Data is comparable within a unit, but not between units. This should be resolved for 2009 and future years.
10
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
Treatment Accomplishments by County as of 2009 vs. 2006 Roundtable Recommendations
Front Range Roundtable
county
Roundtable priority areas as
of 2006
Acres treated anywhere in
County (2004-2008)
Acres treated in Roundtable
priority areas% of priority acres treated
% of treatments outside
Roundtable priorities
Boulder 150,245 12,844 12,844 9% 0%
Clear Creek 63,133 246 100 0% 59%
Douglas 181,303 12,480 8,975 5% 28%
El Paso 138,681 5,658 744 1% 87%
Gilpin 44,453 787 478 1% 39%
Grand 56,563 20,042 4,479 8% 78%
Jefferson 227,805 22,336 22,336 10% 0%
Larimer 226,460 23,425 7,671 3% 67%
Park 194,431 10,191 8,922 5% 12%
Teller 143,850 21,880 13,573 9% 38% TOTAL 1,426,925 129,888 80,122 6% 38%
Data underlying the monitoring map on the prior slide:
11
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
Progress Towards the Roundtable VisionDirect Roundtable Successes
1. Launched the self-sustaining Woodland Park Healthy Forest Initiative (WPHFI) with seed funds of $75,000 provided by Roundtable members and partners, which the WPHFI leveraged into an additional $175,000 in other funding
2. Helped submit a winning proposal to the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program (CFLRP) for an additional $1 million for Front Range National Forests in FY10, $3.4 million in FY11 and $3.1 million in FY12 (with the possibility of further allocations).
Partners’ successes consistent with recommendations
3. Long term stewardships contracts: Arapaho-Roosevelt and Pike-San Isabel (3,000 acres/yr for 10 years)
4. Increased federal funding for on the ground treatments: $1.8 mm more in 2008 than in 2006; $1 million in 2009 ARRA funds
5. Biomass utilization: bioheating in Gilpin, Boulder, and Park counties; planned in El Paso; 22 slash sites for private landowners across Front Range
6. CWPPs: 75 Front Range CWPPs approved (out of 151 completed in Colorado)
7. Policies: Passage of state legislation authorizing the creation of local Forest Improvement Districts
12
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
Progress Against 2006 Roundtable Recommendations
Set clear priorities and ensure progress against common goals
Ensure local leadership and planning
Reduce the cost of forest treatments
Increase funding for forest treatments
2006 Roundtable goals Recommended initiatives
1. Identify new state and local funding sources for treatments on state and private land.
2. Increase forest treatment incentives for private landowners.
3. Advocate for additional federal funding for Front Range forest treatments.
4. Increase appropriate application of prescribed fire and wildland fire use as a management tool.
5. Increase utilization of woody biomass for facility heating.
6. Increase contract sizes and durations with stewardship contracts on federal land.
7. Change local policy to limit the growth of fire risk in the Wildland-Urban Interface.
8. Promote the development of Community Wildfire Protection Plans for Front Range communities-at-risk.
9. Adopt a clear and common framework for prioritizing treatments.
10. Convene follow-on Roundtable to ensure implementation of recommended initiatives.
Source: Most initiatives were rated by a poll at the September 18, 2009 Quarterly Roundtable meeting of 37 attendees from 24 organizations representing 11 stakeholder groups. Ratings for initiatives 3, 5, and 6 were increased by one level at the December 2, 2010 Executive Team meeting. Ratings for initiatives 3, 5, and 6 were raised on level at the March 4, 2011 Roundtable meeting.
2011 “gut check”
B
B
Y
B
Y
B
P
Y
B
Y
P
April 2010OEO team analysis
Sept. 2009 “gut
check”
P
Y
Y
B
Y
P
B
B B
B
Y
B
G
B
P
B
G
R
R
G
Y
P
Significant progress made
Initial progress madeNeeds attention
B Some progress made
R No action taken
13
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
Roundtable Organization
1. The Front Range Roundtable is not itself a legal entity but an informal volunteer coalition with CUSP acting as fiscal agent. 2. Partner groups are separate from the Front Range Roundtable and have their own organizational structures and initiatives. 3. Project leader and fiscal agent for the CFLRP Monitoring Teams
Members
Executive Team
Facilitator
Community Protection (CP)
Team
Front Range Fuels Treatment Partnership (FRFTP)2
Northern Front Range Mountain Pine Beetle Working Group (NFRMPBWG)2
Colorado Watershed Wildfire Protection Working Group (CWWPWG)2
GuestsLandscape
Restoration (LR) Team
Biomass Utilization and
Slash Sites (BUSS) Team
Roundtable PartnersMixed teams
Coalition for the Upper South Platte (CUSP)—Fiscal Agent)1
Funders
Boulder County National Forest FoundationClear Creek County USFS-ARDouglas County USFS-PikeGilpin County CSFSEl Paso County TNCJefferson County West Range ReclamationLarimer County RMRSPark County Denver WaterTeller County NRCS
Colorado Forest Restoration
Institute (CFRI) 3
14
Wildlife Team
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
Executive Team Structure and Change Process
Current Executive Team Membership
Size: At least 6 or no more than 9 members4
Process for changing membership:
Only when there is a change in the leadership of
the organization shown
1. Three seats are dedicated permanently to these leadership positions from these organizations shown2. Two seats are dedicated to these stakeholder groups shown with the representing organization rotating each year, as desired3. One seat is dedicated for the fiscal agent of the Roundtable, one seat is for each of the two main working teams: the Community Protection Team and the Landscape
Restoration Team. One or two seats are open to additional or other stakeholder groups with the stakeholder type and/or representing organization rotating each year as desired among: Conservation, County Commissioner, Energy, Insurance, Local Government, Planning, Private, Recreation, Science / Academic, State Government, Timber, or Water
4. Membership size can very depending on the decisions of the Executive team and Roundtable needs / number of applicants
Dedicated to certain organizations1
Dedicated to certain stakeholder groups2
Open to other stakeholder groups3
Term ends Dec. 2012
15
Terms end May 2013
USFS-AR Supervisor
Glenn Casamassa
USFS-PSI Supervisor
Jerri Marr
CSFS State Forester
Joe Duda
Conserva-tion NGO
Paige Lewis, The Nature
Conservancy
County Commis-sioner—North
Cindy Domenico,
Boulder County
County Commis-sioner—South
John Tighe, Park County
Treasurer
Carol Ekarius,
Coalition for the Upper
South Platte
Landscape Restoration
Team Liaison
Pam Motley, West Range Reclamation
Community Protection
Team Liaison
Megan Davis,
Boulder County
Terms end or renew at end of June 2013
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
Front Range Roundtable Roles1. Propose strategic, organizational, and operational priorities for the Roundtable’s consideration
at Quarterly meetings2. In between Quarterly meetings, make decisions on behalf of the Roundtable as needed3. Approve agendas for Roundtable Quarterly meetings (proposed by Facilitator)4. Meet once each quarter between Quarterly Roundtable meetings
Executive Team
Working Teams
Facilitator1. Schedule, arrange, and facilitate Roundtable Quarterly meetings, Executive Team meetings,
and working team meetings2. Support working teams in achieving their goals by providing organizational, administrative, and
logistical support (e.g., keeping work plans) —not content or legwork3. Act as the central point of contact for all Roundtable internal and external communications
(e.g., email distribution list, website maintenance)
1. Execute on the Roundtable’s strategic goals, according to work plans developed jointly by the teams
2. Present progress updates at Quarterly Roundtable meetings3. Attend working team meetings as scheduled, typically two calls per month with some in
person meetings as determined by the team
Members1. Attend quarterly Roundtable meetings and, when required, approve or change proposals by
the Executive Team2. Share relevant announcements and updates to Quarterly Roundtable meetings; productively
contribute to discussions, honoring the obligation to dissent when necessary3. Volunteer for working teams if able and/or want to see something done by the Roundtable
16
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
Front Range Roundtable Participants Through the Years
Org Type OrganizationConservation ARP Foundation Coalition for the Upper South Platte
Conservation Districts and Colorado Geological SurveyForest Health Task Force
Indian Peaks Wilderness Alliance
Southern Rockies Conservation Alliance
The Nature Conservancy The Wilderness SocietyCounty Boulder County Clear Creek County Colorado Counties Inc. Douglas County El Paso County Gilpin County Grand County Jefferson County Larimer County Park County Teller County
EnergyColorado Renewable Resource Cooperative
Environmental Energy Partners Forest Energy Colorado Xcel EnergyPlanning American Planning AssociationRecreation Colorado Mountain ClubState gov't Colorado General Assembly
Org Type OrganizationFederal agency Bureau of Land Management National Forest Foundation National Park Service
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Rocky Mountain Research Station US Bureau of Land Management US Fish and Wildlife Service US Forest Service US Geological Survey US Forest Service, PSICC Colorado Division of Wildlife US Forest Service-Region 2 US Forest Service, ARPFederal gov't US House of Representatives Office of US Senator Bennet
InsuranceRocky Mountain Insurance Information Association
Local gov't
City of Fort CollinsColorado Municipal LeagueNorthern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictCity of Woodland Park
Org Type OrganizationPrivate Beh Management Consulting, Inc. Bihn Systems Confluence Energy Habitat Management Inc.Science / Academic Center of the American West Colorado State Forest Service Colorado State University Fire & Life Safety Educators of Colorado Rocky Mountain Tree-Ring Research University of Colorado at Denver University of DenverState agency Colorado Air Pollution Control Division
Colorado Division of Emergency Management
Colorado Office of Economic Development Colorado State Forest Service Governor's Energy Office Colorado State Forest Service Colorado Division of WildlifeTimber Colorado State Tree Farm Committee Colorado Timber Industry Association West Range ReclamationWater American Water Works Association City of Aurora Denver Water
~190 people from ~80 organizations are currently subscribed to email list (to join, see www.frontrangeroundtable.org “Sign Up”)
17
© 2012. All rights reserved.Front Range Roundtable
Front Range Roundtable 2012 Goals
Community Protection (CP) Team
Biomass Utilization and Slash Sites (BUSS) Team
1. Share information about biomass utilization developments across the Front Range (via monthly calls)
Landscape Restoration (LP) Team
1. Serve as the Front Range CFLR project multi-party monitoring group
2. Develop an adaptive management process and recommendations
3. Revise the June 2011 CFLR monitoring plan4. Assemble and inventory GIS and other data to facilitate
information sharing on Front Range forest research/fire history.
Executive Team1. Lead in forming a coalition to recommend policy
initiatives to limits fire risks in the WUI. 2. Lead the Roundtable to agree on a collaborative adaptive
management process3. Fundraise at least $50,000
18
2012 Goals
1. Delegated to Community Protection team2. Delegated to Landscape Restoration Team3. Main goal and purposeThis team has paid facilitation
Status as of Nov. 2012
• IM Team’s 2012 goals are in question: 1. Develop a project plan and attract funding for a
turn-key project around at least one of the highest priority landscape identified.
2. Update the Front Range 10-County map of completed treatments
1. Volunteer-led and facilitated
1. On track (new findings and methods)
2. On track (agreeing on narrative)
3. Deferred due to lack of capacity, but posting “addendums” on website for now
4. Deferred due to lack of capacityThis team has paid facilitation
Wildlife Team1. Prioritizing an abridged list of species to monitor from
the 2011 CFLRP Monitoring Plan, 2. Setting population trends for each target species
expected if forest restoration is achieved, and3. Recommending data collection and monitoring methods
for each target species given funding constraints and monitoring methods in use. calls)
1. Just launched in Nov. 2012, will have paid facilitation
1. Volunteer-led and facilitated