© 2015 haynes and boone, llp distressed business environments: contract revisions and workout and...

© 2015 Haynes and Boone, LLP© 2015 Haynes and Boone, LLP

Distressed Business Environments: Contract Revisions and Workout and Bankruptcy Options Presented by:Patrick L. HughesCharles A. Beckham, Jr.

April 23, 2015

© 2015 Haynes and Boone, LLP


2

Liquidity Problems for the Oilfield

Increasing Liquidity Constraints in the Oilfield Services

– PE Principal: “There are 79 private equity-backed pressure pumping

companies, and you only need 10.”

– Big shake-out in service industry

– Stacking equipment -- fast

– E&P companies asking for large (20-30%) discounts from suppliers to

protect capex spending

– RIFs to reduce operating costs.

– Reduced revenues to service companies could be insufficient to cover

interest and capex and to maintain a trained workforce



3

Liquidity Problems for the Oilfield

Marginal fields; high cost fields; storage constraints; lackluster demand

Increasing Liquidity Constraints for Oilfield Companies

– Could trigger covenant and/or payment defaults under ABLs

– Lots of consolidation ahead

– Liquidation of weaker players

– High priced debt

SO WHAT DO WE DO NOW?



4

First Steps-Better Check Your Liens and Covenants

Mistakes Matter – Check Lien Perfection

(January 21, 2015, 11:08 AM ET) – The Second Circuit invalidated JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s lien on a $1.5 billion loan to General Motors Corp.’s bankrupt predecessor, enforcing mistaken paperwork filed by its law firm that the bank failed to notice.

The appeals court’s ruling followed an October directive from the Delaware Supreme Court that a secured party’s filing of a so-called UCC-3 form sufficed to terminate the bank’s security interest, no matter any subjective intent to do otherwise.

“It is clear that although JPMorgan never intended to terminate the [lien], it authorized the filing of a UCC-3 termination statement that had that effect,” the three-judge panel said. “Nothing more is needed.”

REVIEW LIEN AND COLLATERAL PERFECTION EARLY



5

First Steps-Better Check Your Liens and Covenants

Do you have what you think you have?

2015 -- Midstream Company has field dedications with Upstream Company. Upstream did a corporate restructure [non bankruptcy]. Assets and operations separated. Assets stay in entity that contracted with Midstream.

Review your contracts, but also your counterparties early.



6

Another First Step: Verify D&O Coverage

• D&O Coverage in Place?• I mean Really?• What is it rated?• What does it cover?• What does it not cover?• Surely outside counsel will take a promise of future answer on coverage to

represent now?• What can I do about it if the insurer does not answer fast?• Why should I care?• What do you mean the indemnity rights are just prepetition claims?• What do you mean the D&O is personally coming out of pocket?• What do you mean my personal and company email accounts can be

accessed?



7

Next Step: Review Opportunities in Distressed Acquisitions

• Acquisition and Investment Opportunities:

– Buy market share via “M&A” or “363”

– Companies may need additional equity investment or mezzanine/2nd lien

debt to address borrowing base limitations or pay downs-can you “loan to

own”?

– Achieve or maintain economies of scale for operations and purchasing

power with suppliers



8

Opportunities in Distressed Acquisitions

• Typical Situation– Company (operator) faced with borrowing base adjustment or pressure

from secured lender– Lower revenues due to declining oil, gas and NGL prices and resulting

reduced activity – Inability to procure new business or maintain existing margins– Unprofitable locations/operations– Capital constraints discourage new drilling?– How do you fix it? Why use a bankruptcy?



9

Bankruptcy Sale and Auction Process to Get Certainty

• Acquisitions in Chapter 11

– Seller is in distress

– Secured lender may require it

– Purchaser may require it

– Minimize challenges to the sale

– Bid procedures and stalking

horse protections

– 363 Sale is free and clear

– Easier to assign contracts

– Resolve Unprofitable location/

division issues



10

What Are the Benefits of Chapter 11 Acquisitions?

Court approved bid procedure

Bid protections

Reimbursement and breakup

fees

Possibility of low purchase price

Stalking horse may be DIP Lender

Forum for resolving contested claims

Assets are free and clear of

liens, claims and interests

Resolution of title and

environmental Issues

Resolve consent Issues

Cherry pick the good assets

No fraudulent transfer risk

Limited successor liability



11

What Are the Downsides to Chapter 11?

• Reputational risk

• Loss of control

• Inability to get financing?

• Competing bids to the “chosen one”

• Expense [?]



12

Bankruptcy Sale – Assignment of Contracts

• Bankruptcy Allows Contract Rejection/Assignment

– Leases and contracts may be assumed/assigned or rejected

– Assignment can be implemented despite consent rights of counter-party

to contract

– Assignment requires curing past defaults and providing adequate

assurance of future financial performance

– Who pays cure (buyer or seller) is a negotiated

point

– But some exceptions



13

Concerns If Not Done In Bankruptcy?

• Fraudulent Transfer Risk

– Was the deal “too good”?

– Was the deal “in good faith”? [subjective and objective]

• Successor Liability Risk?

• Fiduciary Liability Issues?



14

How to Protect Against a Fraudulent Transfer Risk in a Nonbankruptcy Process?

• Diligence seller and pro forma’s/book

• Diligence most recent value representations

– To banks

– Owner financial statements

• Get a current valuation

• Build your file on front end

• Owner statements of value

• Recitals in the PSA



15

What Happens in a Bankruptcy Case?

• Financing Orders on the Front End

• Court Permissions Needed

• 363 v. Plan Process

• Timetable

• Committees

• US Trustee

• Retention of Professionals Issues

• Rewrite Interest Rates and Debt Terms

• Overcome the “Holdouts”

• Resolve Exposure to Mass Tort Claims [Silica, Asbestos, Environmental]

• Venue Issues

• Derivatives/Forward Contracts



16

Renegotiating your contracts – Changing the “deal”

• “We had a deal, but I need you to renegotiate . . . or else.”

• Does the “new deal” have to be in writing?

http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAcQjRw&url=http://masterstevanus.blogspot.com/2014_05_01_archive.html&ei=MK8iVfSGEseFsAWE8oHoBA&bvm=bv.89947451,d.cGU&psig=AFQjCNHzFfxY1SyRMOlGZYDiYaIMqFcLjw&ust=1428422830396799



17

Get it in writing - Statute of Frauds

An agreement subject to the statute of frauds is not

enforceable unless it or a “memorandum” of it, is:

– (1) in writing; and

– (2) signed by authorized person

TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN. § 26.01(a) (West 2009)



18

Statute of Frauds Applies to:

• Contract for the sale of real estate;

• Lease of real estate for a term longer than one year;

• Agreement not to be performed within one year;

• Agreement to pay commission for sale or purchase of

mineral interests;

• Contract for sale of goods for the price of $500 or more;

• Suretyship and various other situations.

TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN. §§ 2.201 & 26.01(a)



19

Modifications to a Contract

• “Generally, any modification to an agreement subject to

the statute of frauds must also be in writing.”

• “If the modification to the agreement is not a material one,

then an oral modification may be enforceable.”

• “[I]n considering whether there has been an oral

modification . . . the parties’ behavior may be considered

as evidence of the agreement.”Petrohawk Properties, L.P. v. Jones, No. 06-14-00003-CV, 2015 WL 170225 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Jan. 14, 2015, no pet. h.) (extension of time for filing review petition).



20

Petrohawk Properties, LP v. Jones

• Agreement to lease mineral interests during Haynesville

Shale frenzy in 2008.

• 8500 net acres, $23,500/acre lease bonus, potentially

~$200 million bonus.

• $10 million escrow deposit, liquidated damages.

• Title due diligence period.

• Agreement provided for Aug. 15, 2008 closing date.



21


• Title work progressed slowly.

• Parties agreed to postpone closing to Aug. 27, 2008.

• On Aug. 27, closed on 2700 acres, Petrohawk paying $51

million, including the escrow.

• Postponed second closing to Oct. 9, and planned a third

closing on Nov. 6.

• Financial crisis during the fall of 2008.

• Oct. 7, Petrohawk notified lessors, not leasing any more.



22


• Petrohawk argued that Plaintiffs had 30 days to clear title

on any additional acreage after the Aug. 29 first closing

and, having not done so, Petrohawk had no further

obligations.

• Lessors sued.

• Judgment for $12.3 million damages, plus $4.2 million

fees.



23


• “Under certain circumstances, an oral agreement to

extend the time of performance of a contract required to

be in writing is enforceable, if the oral agreement is made

before the written contract expires.”

• “[S]uch an extension of time for performance may be

implied as well as express.”

• “[A]n oral extension of time to perform is enforceable only

if it does not materially alter the underlying written

contract.”



24


• “[T]he oral modification to conduct multiple closings

neither changed the obligations and rights of the parties

under the Agreement nor substantially altered the

Agreement itself.”

• “[M]odification was not material, the modification was not

required to be in writing.”



25

Other potential exceptions to the Statute of Frauds

• Partial performance/virtual fraud

• Full performance by plaintiff

• Promissory estoppel/unsigned writing

• Main purpose/suretyship

• Fiduciary duty/constructive fraud



26

Contract Litigation over Intent, Ambiguity, Surrounding Circumstances

• Often expensive – see Petrohawk case.

• Under Texas law, a plaintiff who prevails on a breach of

contract claim can be granted attorneys’ fees ($4.2M in

fees to plaintiff in Petrohawk).

• Oral evidence often disputed.

• Multitude of contract construction canons can make

issues complex.



27

Avoiding Contract Litigation

• Recognize that there are exceptions to the statute of

frauds writing requirements.

• When modifying the deal, best to formalize the

agreement, and make sure there is an agreement.

• A commonly changed provision – time of performance,

even by implication.

• Invest in transactional attorney time, to possibly avoid

litigation attorney time.

© 2015 haynes and boone, llp distressed business environments: contract revisions and workout and...

Documents