Вісник ХНУ №5, Т.1., 2011
DESCRIPTION
Вісник ХНУ №5, Т.1., 2011.TRANSCRIPT
-
2011, 5, T. 1
1
11
2011
-
2011, 5, T. 1
2
19.01.2006 2-05/1 (. 22006 .)
1997 . 6
, 2011, 5, . 1 (180)
: ( 2005 . , . )
. ., , . . ., , , ,
. ., . . ., ,
. ., , . . ., , , , , -
. .,
. . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . ., . . . . .
: . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . - . .
, 1 30.08.2011
:
, 29016, . , . , 11,
(03822) 2-51-08
e-mail: [email protected] [email protected]
web: http://library.tup.km.ua/visnyk_tup.htm http://visniktup.narod.ru http://vestnik.ho.com.ua
.
9721 29 2005 ()
, 2011 , 2011
-
2011, 5, T. 1
3
. . : ........ 7
. . , . . - ...................................................................................................................... 10
. . ........................................................................................................................................ 13
. . ...................................................................................................... 16
. . - ...................................................................................................... 21
. . ........................ 25
. . .................. 30
. . - ..................................................................................... 35
. . ................................................................................................... 38
. . - ....... 41
. . ...................................................................................................................... 44
. . , . . , . . ....................................................................................................................................................... 49
. . ..................................................... 53
. . ............................................................................................................................. 56
. . .................................................................. 60
-
2011, 5, T. 1
4
. . ...................................................................................................................................................... 64
. . ............................................................................................................... 68
. . , . . - ..................................................... 73
. . , . . ..................................................................................................................................................................... 76
. . ....................................................................................... 80
. . ..................................................................................................................................................... 83
. . , . . ............................................................................................................................... 86
. . ................................................................................................................................. 90
. . - ............................................................................................................................ 94
. . , . . : ................................................................................................................................................................... 99
. . .................................................... 102
. . ............ 106
. . ...................................................... 110
. . ..................................................................................................................................................... 115
. . ....................................................................................................................................................... 119
. . : ........................................................................................ 122
-
2011, 5, T. 1
5
. . , . . ............................................ 125
. . ....................................... 129
. . ......................... 132
-
. . ...................................................................................................... 136
. . , . . .......................................................................................................................................... 139
. . ........................................................................................................... 142
. . : , , ............................................................................................................................ 147
. . ................................. 150
. . , . . - ....................................................... 155
. . , . . ........................................................................................................................ 158
-
. . ................ 163
. . ................................................................................................................................................. 166
. . .......................................................... 170
. . ............................................... 175
. . , . . , . . ......................................................... 179
-
2011, 5, T. 1
6
. . ................................................................. 182
. . : , ................................................................................................................................ 186
. . : ......................................................................................................... 190
. . .......................................................................... 194
. . ............................................................................................................................... 200
. . ....................................................................................... 205
. . ................................................................................................................................ 208
. . - ................................................................................................................................................. 212
. . : ............................................................................................................................ 217
. . ................................................................. 223
. . , ......... 228
. . , . . ........................................................................................................................... 230
-
2011, 5, T. 1
7
65.018 . .
:
,
. Illumination basic ways, methods and mechanisms of providing of economic security of the production economic systems,
at the level of society of country and at the level of enterprises. : , , , , .
. , ( , , , ) , , . , , . , . , , , .
. 19972002 .. . 2 , 300 3 . 2 . , , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . -, . , . , . , . .
: . , . , . , . , . , . . , , .
. , , [13].
. : , , - - , - ; , ; , , - - , , .
; , ; ( ) ; , ; ; ; ; , ; , , ;
-
2011, 5, T. 1
8
- ; .
. , . , . . :
- ' ;
- , ;
- - , ;
- ;
- ; -
(); -
. (
), , :
- ' , ;
- ' . : - -
; - , ,
, , ;
- , ;
- , , , , , ;
- - ;
- ;
- , , ;
- , , , ';
- ; - ,
, , , ; - , . : - ,
, ;
- ; - ,
;
-
2011, 5, T. 1
9
- ; - , -
; - , , ; - ,
; - 5 % ; -
. ,
: --, , , , , , -, . , , , .
. , , .
, . , . , , .
, . , , .
: , .
, , , , , .
: , , ; , ; , , .
, , ; ; , ; , .
, , , .
- , .
. : , , , , .
, .
. , , , , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
10
1. . . - / . . // . . 2010. 6. . 2. . 9799.
2. . . : [. ] / . . : , 2007. 299 .
3. . . : [ ] / . ., . ., . . : , 2007. 112 .
16.08.2011
657.22 . . , . .
-
-
. , - . .
In the article the analysis of scientific views on the formation of accounting and analytical support management. It is proved that the development of accounting and analytical support meets management. Recommends the use of strategic management accounting to economic security industry.
: , - , , .
. , , , , - .
, . . : (1) , ; (2) ; (3) , , [1, . 7].
, , , , , : , ; , ; ; (, ); . , .
: .
. . . , .
. , , , . XX . .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
11
. , , . , , , , . , , [2, . 20].
, , , . , , , , . : . .
. . ., .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , . . . , . .. , .
, , , . , , . , , , . , . , .
.. : , , . , , , , () [3, . 555].
. , , , .
. , , , . .. , : , ... , , [4, .13]. : , , , , . , - .
, , , , . , , , , , - . . 1.
, .
. , , . ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
12
, , . .
1
1. , .
2. , ,
, [5, . 14].
3. ,
[6, . 14].
4. -
- , ,
, [7, . 10].
5. -
[7, . 265].
. (.. , .. ), , , . .. . . , . . (SCM Strategic Cost Management), , ( Total Cash Management).
(strategic management accounting (SMA)), . 90- . , , [8, .30]. [8, . 36]. . : ', , . : , , , .
, , ... , , : , , ( ) [9, . 321].
, . , , ; ; .
, , - .
. , , , : ; ; ; .
, , - , ; ; .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
13
1. .. : / .. , . : [. . / . .. ]. . : , 1995. 416 .
2. .. : / .. . : , , 1996. 638 .
3. . . , / . [. / . .; . . ..]. . : , 1997. 576 .
4. .. / .. // . 2000. 5. . 2. C. 913.
5. . : : [. . . .. ]. . : , 2000. 160 .
6. . / . [. . / .. ]. . : - , 2000. 454 .
7. .. . 50 / .. /. : , 2001. 320 .
8. . / . [. ., . .. ]. . : , , 1998. 616 .
9. .. : [. ] / .. : , 2002. 479 .
10.08.2011
338.331 . .
,
In article the author considers essence of a world economic crisis in a cut of scientific concepts, thus, the author expands
scientific spheres of their application : , , , ,
, .
. . , [1]. . . , .
. , .
. , , . , . - . , . . [2], . [3], . , . , . , . , . [4].
. .
. , , , : , , , , , , , , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
14
. ,
. , , .
, . , , , , . . , , . () . , , . ( ) : , , , , , .
, . , , . : , , . , , . (, ), , (, ). , .
, , , . (, , .) ( ).
, , . , : ( ), ( ), ( , ), ( , ( ) ).
(, , , ' , ..), , .
() , .
( ). , .
:
-, . ;
-, , ;
-, , : , , , ;
-
2011, 5, T. 1
15
- , '. ;
-, , , . , ;
-, , . , , , . , , , , . ;
-, . ;
-, ' , . , , , .
.
- ' -. . . - , . - ( ), , (, ). , . - , . . . , , , .
. , . , , , , , . , .
, .
, , .
, , - . ( ) .
, . , , , .
, ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
16
, . - . , . , . , , , . () (- ) . , , . .
, , , , . . .
, , , , , . .
. , . , , . , .
1. . : . / . ; [. .]. . : , 1993. 543 .
2. . . : : 2 . / .. . : , 1989.
3. . . / . . : , 2009. 302 .
4. . : . 2 / . , . . . : , 1961. 648 .
10.08.2011
330.101:658 . .
, .
. The article described a method of evaluation of level economic security enterprise based on fuzzy sets theory. : , , ,
, .
. () , . , . - , , .
. : . , .
, : ; -; -.
.., .., .., .., .., .. - [14]. , -
-
2011, 5, T. 1
17
, . -
[4, 5]. .., .., .., .. - . - . , .
- , . [6]. .., .. (, . ) .
.. .. , - - , 1%.
.. , [7].
, . , . , , . , . . .
, .
. , [8]. , - , .
: , , , , , , ; , . [9].
, - , , , , ; - , , , , , ; - , , , ; - , , .
, , , , , .
, , , , , ; , ; , , .
, , . ,
. ,
, , , .
, , , - , .
, , , , , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
18
, , , .
, , , , . - . . , , , , .
. - . , 72 - [8]. , . , , 5-6. , .
, -. . . , -, .
: , -
, 1;m m M , ; , 1;9jy j ; R .
, ,
, , 1;kz k K , K
.
, : 1 2, , ... , X x x x . X ( ). ,
1 2, , ... , jj NX x x x , jN . -
1 2, , ... , jkjk NX x x x , jkN . :
1;9 ; 1; ; 1;9j jk j jkj X X k K X X j X X .
R : 1R
; 2R ; 3R
; 4R ; 5R
. - .
, 1;5iR i : ( ), 1;5i i ,
. R
: 1 = (0,0; 0,0; 0,15; 0;25); 2 = (0,15; 0,25; 0,35; 0;45); 3 = (0,35; 0,45; 0,55; 0;65); 4 = (0,55;
0,65; 0,75; 0;85); 5 = (0,75; 0,85; 1,0; 1;0). , 0; 1P .
. :
- k - j - : 1 2, , ... , jkjk jk Nz g ; - j - , : 1 2, , ... jj j Ky f ; - , V : 1 2, , ... , VW . . :
, ,g f ( ), , ,jk j X X
, ,z y W . ,
: 1R 1( ) ; 2R
-
2011, 5, T. 1
19
2 ( ) ; 3R 3( ) ; 4R
4 ( ) ; 5R 5( ) .
R . P . 1.
1 P
( )
0 < P < 0,15 1
0,15 < P < 0,25
1 10 (0,25 )P
1 21
0,25 < P < 0,35 1
0,35 < P < 0,45
2 5 (0,45 )P
2 31
0,45 < P < 0,55 1
0,55 < P < 0,65
3 5 (0,65 )P
3 41
0,65 < P < 0,75 1
0,75 < P < 0,85 4 10 (0,85 )P
4 51
0,85 < P < 1,0 1
, , ,
( ) , .
, 1;v v V . vD v , .
v
vD : 1 v ; 2
v ; 3 v ; 4
v ; 5 v .
( ), 1;vx m V . ( -) : )
; ) ; )
.
, , . 01-, [10] (. 2).
v - vp
. vw
.
W :
1
1
V
v
v
W p
(1)
, [10]:
2 1
, 1;1
v
(V v )p v V
(V )V
(2)
vw .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
20
2
vx
( )
0 < vx < 0,15 1
0,15 < vx < 0,25 1 10 (0,25 )vx
1 21
0,25 < vx < 0,35 1
0,35 < vx < 0,45 2 5 (0,45 )vx
2 31
0,45 < vx < 0,55 1
0,55 < vx < 0,65 3 5 (0,65 )vx
3 41
0,65 < vx < 0,75 1
0,75 < vx < 0,85 4 10 (0,85 )vx
4 51
0,85 < vx < 1,0 1
, :
1vp V (3)
, , , 01-:
V
v v
v 1
(x) (x) p .
(4)
,
W .
, . . , . .
W v
. , , 1;vW v V v
. , -
, 1;v v V , , [10]:
v
v
v 1
(0,2v 0,1)W
. (5)
W (. 1)
. , ,
, , P 5. P (. 1) .
. , , : , , , , . , -
-
2011, 5, T. 1
21
, , ., .
.
1. . / . , . // . 1998. 10. . 48-51.
2. .. / .. // . 2000. - 2. . 1729.
3. . / . // . 1998. 10. . 45.
4. .. : / .. // . -. . 6. . 1995. 3. . 3.
5. : [ / . .. ]. . : , 2004. 768 .
6. .. / .. , .. // . 2008. 4. . 8897.
7. .. : [] / .. : , 2004. 195 .
8. .. / .. : , 2001. 198 .
9. , : [. . . . . / .. , .. , .. .]. . : , 2009. 544 .
10. .. - / .. - : , 2002. 276 .
19.08.2011
339. 543 . .
-
-
. Certain measures of activation custom-tariff adjusting in the system of economic security and economy on the whole of
charges of production of competitive goods of industrial enterprises. : - , , , .
. , , - : ; , ; - .
, , , , , , .
. - ' , . ., . , . ., . ., . ., . . . ., . .
. - , .
. - ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
22
, , , , .
, , :
- , ; - ; -
; - ; - ,
. -
() ; - , , ,
; - ,
; -
, . ,
- , , :
- , , , ;
- ;
- - ;
- , , .
, , , . - , , - , , , -.
, - , , , , , , , .
, , . . , , , , , . . .
, , , .
. : -
; - ;
-
2011, 5, T. 1
23
- , , [53].
, , .
- . , , , . , , , . , , , :
R = (p ms)/ v, (1)
R ; p ; s ; m , ; v , , . , ,
: , ; , .
. ; ; ; ; ; , ; , ; .
, , . , , , , , . . , , , , , . ; ; ; .
, , , , . , , , , .
, , .
, , .
, . , , , , .
, , ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
24
. , , , - , .
, , , , , . , .
. : , , , , ; ; , , . , .
-, , .
, , , , . .
[3] 90 . . , , . , . .
, . . , , .
. . . , . . , () , . . , , . , - , .
. . , . . . , . , , , .
, , , , , . . , . , .
. ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
25
, . . 12 . , . , , , .
. , , , . , . , . .
, , . , . , . , .
. , - , -' - . - .
1. . . : [] / . . : , 2007. 304.
2. . . : / . . . : ,2006. 310 .
3. : , 23. 09. 94 185/94-
14.08.2011
332.1 . .
-
,
. The article presents research on institutional planning, alternative scenarios and select the most appropriate for the
particular situation of urban development. : , , .
, . . - , , , , . , , , , , . , , , . , , , , . . .
, , [14 ] , , , . . 1964 . 1970- . 1980-
-
2011, 5, T. 1
26
, . 1970- , . , . , . , , , , , , ( ') .
, - ; .
, , , , . .
- ' , ' , . - ' , : , , , : , .
- , , , , 4 , :
- 1 ;
- 2 - -, ' ';
- 3 , , , ' ;
- 4 , , , , . , .
, , - , , , , . , , , . , , .
() - , :
- ; - -
'; - -
- , (, , , , ).
, : - () , ,
, , ;
- , , ;
- -, .
, :
- ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
27
; -
. ',
, , , :
- , , , , - , , - -, ;
- , ' , , - .
- -.
, , .
- . ' , .
.
, , ' , ( ). , , , . , . , , 1020 , [5].
, . 1.
. : .
2. .
3. , . ' - , .
1 . , "",
, . , , , , , . , , , . 2 . , , , , ' . , . , , , ' . , , . , , ( ) , .
. . . , . ' , ; , ; ; ;
-
2011, 5, T. 1
28
: : , , . , PEST-, , , , , , , , ( ), . , , , .
1
1.
(), .
2. , ,
( , . .). ( ).
, . '.
3.
( , ,
, - ). .
.
4.
, . - .
, .
5. .
( 2015, 2020 .).
. , (,
. .). .
6.
.
7. .
( , , , ).
2
( , ,
)
,
, ,
, , '
, .
,
. . . : ; ; . , , , . . GBU BEAR [6]. , . BEAR : , , , .
,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
29
: -
-, , ; - ; - ; - ; - . , ,
, , . , , . , ', . , , , , ' .
. , . , , . , , [7]. . , . , , . , , .
, .
1. / , . , . , , , , , , .
2. . 3.
. . 4. . 5. . 6. . , ,
-, , . / . .
7. . , , , , . , . , . , . , / () , ' .
8. . . . , . , , , , .
, , ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
30
, -, -, , - . , . , . , , . , , , , , , . -.
1. , 1999 . 2. . / . . :, 1979. 176 . 3. . . / . . . : , 1984. 256 . 4. . . / . . . : ,
1991. 185 . 5. . ' . , , -
: -, 2009. 6. -. . -: ,
, 2007. 7. -. . .
, 2009.
18.08.2011
378(477) . .
,
. In this article the system reformations nd problems of Higher Education and main directions of its modernization in
accordance with the Bologna standards. : , .
. , . , , , , . . , , .
, , - , .
. - . : . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . .
. . , ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
31
, . , , . , , .
. 2005 . , . , . , .
, :
();
; ; ,
;
; , , ,
, , . - ,
, , .
? , . , , , , , , . .
, , . . , , . , . . ' ' ' .
, . , . , , , , . , , .
- . , . . . , ' () - ' () ' . , ' . , , , , . . ( , , ). , .
, , , . . , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
32
, . . , - .
, , :
1. - .
2. , .
3. , .
4. , . 5. , ,
. 6. - ,
, , .
7. - , .
. , , , , - .
. 1. ,
, . , . . , . , . , , - , .
2. ( , ), .
- , . , ( ). , , , - . . .
3. , . , . , . , , . , , , , . , ; , , , .
, 9001200 . 600 900 . , . , .
4. , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
33
5. , , , . .
6. - , (European Network of Quality Assurance in Higher Education) .
, , , [6].
. , , , , .
, . , , , . . , , - , .
. , 2002 . , , , 200%, , . " - " , - 1,7% . - 1,2% , 0,4% 2009 . 2,54%, 2,26%, 2,34%, 0,53%. , . , .
. , . , , , , :
1) , ;
2) , " ";
3) , , .
, , , .
, , . , , , .
1. .. : , , / .. . : , 2004. 804 .
2. . : / . // . 2007. 2 (43). . 1421.
-
2011, 5, T. 1
34
3. .. : / .. // - 2008. . : ; . : ,2008. . 161167.
4. . 2002-2011 : // . 2002. 4 .
5. .. / .. // . . : , 2008. . . . 4457.
6. . [ ] / . / . : http://www.mon.gov.ua
10.08.2011
-
2011, 5, T. 1
35
658.1 . .
-
. In the article approaches and intercommunication are considered in relation to the management of enterprise a
competitiveness on strategic and tactical levels. : , , , ,
.
. . , . . - , . . , .
. , , . , .
. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . .
, , , .
.
. , . , . , - .
, . . , [1]. , , , , [3, . 83.]. , ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
36
, , .
, ,
.
,
( ).
-
, , , ,
,
, .
,
, .
.
: -
.
,
- ,
.
,
. ,
,
.
(. 1):
( )
,
, ,
,
,
. 1.
, ,
, .
,
.
:
, ,
;
.
-
2011, 5, T. 1
37
, , .
'
, .
,
. ()
. , ,
, .
()
: .
, .
.
' , , ,
[2]. :
- ;
;
- ; ;
-
;
-
,
, ;
- , , ;
- , , , ,
, ;
-
.
'
, , , '
. , ,
,
.
. :
, ,
,
; .
,
, ,
, .
1. .. / ..
// . 26. 2010. . 5055.
2. .. / ..
- . . : - , 2004. 572 .
3. .. / .. . : , 2004. 520 .
20.08.2011
-
2011, 5, T. 1
38
65. 018. 621 (477) . .
. Certainly component elements of the informative system of enterprise for the increase of level of its competitiveness and
providing of competitive edges. : , , .
. , , , , , , , , , . , . , .
. , . ., .., . ., ' . ., ., ., . ., ., . . [13]. . , . , .
: , , .
. , . . . , 15 , (. 1). . , , , .
, , . .
. - , , - , , , . , , , , . , , , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
39
1. : - ; - ; - .
2. : ; ; ; ; .
3.
5.
6. (-, -, -, , -, -, - )
7.
8. ?
9.
10. :
; ; ; - ;
- ; - ; ; .
11.
12.
13.
14.
?
15. -
. 1.
, , . , . . .
. - , - . .
, , , . , , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
40
, . , , .
- , . - : , , , , -, - -. -, , - , , , , SWOT , . , . - , . . - - (. 2).
- - , , , , , , , .
(, , , ,
, -, - -)
?
?
?
. 2. -
-
2011, 5, T. 1
41
. , . , , , , , , , . , , .
: , , , , , , , .
- - , , , .
1. . . / . . : , 2007. 453 .
2. . . : [] / .. . : , 2005. 448 c.
3. . . / . . . : -, 1997. 720 .
21.08.2011
[005.591.4:005.332.4]:334.716(477) . .
-
,
. - .
The essence of restructuring was analyzed as a complex of actions which support the effective and competitive activity. Analyzing of reengineering of business processes like a way to restructuring of enterprises.
: , -, .
. , , , , . , , -, , , .
, , , , , - , . , , , - .
, , , , , , . , [1].
-
2011, 5, T. 1
42
.
. , - .
: .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , . , . , .. , .. , . , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , . , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , . , .. , .. , . , . .
: .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , ., , .. , .., .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , . , . , . , , . , . .
, , , -.
. . , , , , , , ..
, , , .
.. -, - - , . [2].
, , , 2008 , . , . , - , , - [3]. , , , [4].
2008 . , 54 ( - ) , 41, , 46 50 . 0,32% 0,39%. : 25% , 12,3% . (47%) (26,8%) [5].
, , , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
43
, -, , . - .
, , , : , ; , ( ) , [6]. - , , - [2].
. , . - [7, . 18]. , , , , .
- , , , - [7], , - , , , , , , , , , - [7, . 25].
[6], , , , , , , .
, , , ( ), (. 1).
:
;
;
-
()
. 1. -
, -, -
-
2011, 5, T. 1
44
. , - ( , ) .
. , :
- ;
, , ;
, , ( ), .
1. / , , , . [ ] : http: // www.minindustry.crimea-portal.gov.ua/rus/index.php.
2. .. / .. . : , 2006. 367 .
3. .. : [] / .. . : , , 2010. 284 .
4. .. / .. // : : . . .-. . : . 1. : . , 2009. . 225226.
5. [ ]. : http: //stat.wto.org/CountryProfile/WSDBCountryPFView.aspx?Country=UA&Language=F.
6. .. - / .. , .. // - , . . 25. 2007. . 160165.
7. - : [ / . . .. ]. n : - -1 , 2010. 440 .
16.08.2011
339.5:338.43:638.1(477) . .
. RCA (Relative Comparative Advantage Index) RSCA, RCA .
The rise in competition requirements at the world agricultural and food market strengthens the attention to the problem of evaluating international competitiveness of agrarian sectors of some countries and regions. The paper deals with the estimation competitiveness of exported agricultural and food products at the world market through the calculation of indexes RCA (Relative Comparative Advantage) and RSCA, the latter being the symmetric transformation of RCA and allowing to determine promising markets of regional foodstuffs sale.
: , , - .
. , ' .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
45
. , , , . . . .
. ' . , .
: , , , , , - . - . - .
. . : ., ., ., ., ., . , , , , . , ., - ., ., ., . . , , ., ., ., ., ., ., . .
. , , . . , , , . - . - - , .
. . . , , , , ., . , . , , RCA (Relative Comparative Advantage Index), RXA (Relative Export Advantage Index), RMP (Relative Import Penetration Index), RTA (Relative Trade Advantage Index) RSCA. RCA, RTA, RXA RMP, . Balassa, RSCA, RCA [1, 2].
. , . , .
RCA RXA , [3-6]:
-
2011, 5, T. 1
46
/
,/
ij nj
n
ik nk
k n k
X X
RCA RXAX X
(1)
, n i, k j, RCA, , i , j , n , k . [0;+]. , , 1, 0 1 . RXA , RCA , .
.
( )
,[ ( / )]
ij ij
ik jw kw
X MRCA
T T T
(2)
, M , i , j , n , k W. RXA, ,
, :
/
,/
ij nj
n
ik nk
k n k
M M
RMPM M
(3)
, n i, k j. RMP 1, ,
, 1, , . , RMP , . , . RXA. , , , , . , RTA. .
,ij ijRTA RXA RMP (4)
RXA j- i- RMP RMP j- i- .
, .
. RXA RMP , . RTA , , , . , .
, . , , . , RCA [7]. RSCA, :
( 1)( 1).RSCA RCA RCA (5)
(-1), (1). , , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
47
RSCA [8]. RCA : A,
B, C D. (0 RCA 1) , . ,
. (1 RCA 2) , C (2
RCA 4) , D (4 RCA ) .
, 75 . , 4 , (367 . ), (81,4 . ), (81 . ) (. 1).
1
1995 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
2009 . 2005 .
2009 . 1995 .
, +/-
, 1153177 1255185 1410317 1511560 1465634 1496416 1535194 1,1 1,3
, 62728 52439 71462 75600 67700 74900 74000 1,0 1,2
, % 5,44 4,18 5,07 5,00 4,62 5,01 4,90
1,5 5%. . 4,3% (. 1).
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
..
. 1. 19952008 .
, . , , (. 2).
2
RXA RMP RTA RSCA
2005 . 2008 . 2008 . 2008 . 2005 . 2008 . 2005 . 2008 .
1,093 1,038 0,029 0,097 1,064 0,941 0,194 0,078
. RXA 2005 2008 . 1, , , . .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
48
RMP , . RTA . RSCA . , , 2005 2008 . , , , RSCA
, (0 RCA 1) , .
. .
, . , , 90 . , 15 23 . . 24 10% . 2009 . . (), 2005 . 1,2 3 . . 1 . , . , . - .
1,5 400 . . , - , , , , , .., . . , . , , , [9]. , ' ' , , , - , - .. .
. , , . , 4,3% .
- . . . , , ' , , . , , .
1. Balassa B. Trade liberalization and Reveal Comparative Advantage // Manchester School of Economic
and Social Studies. 1965. Vol. 33. P.99-123. 2. Hinloopen J., Marrewijk C. On the Empirical Distribution of the Balassa Index, W.P. Erasmus
University. Rotterdam, 2000. P. 79. 3. Ferto I., Hubbard L.J. The dynamics of agri-food trade patterns. The accession countries case, Paper
-
2011, 5, T. 1
49
presented at the International Conference Agricultural policy reform and the WTO: where are we heading? Capri. Itali. 2003. June 23. P. 16.
4. Piaskouski P. The evolution of the pattern of Polish agri-food trade on EU market / P. Piaskouski //
. : , 2005. . 88-92. 5. . . -
. / . . // - : 3 ., , 3-5 . 2005 . : - " ", 2005 . . 2. . 711.
6. .. / . . // . 2006. 6. . 125131.
7. De Benedictis L, Tamberi M. A note on the Balassa index of revealed comparative advantage //
Manuscript. 2001, P. 2736. 8. Laursen ., Revealed Comparative Advantage and the Alternatives as Measures of International
Specialisation, DRUID WP, 1998. P. 98-31. 9. ., .
[ ] / . , . // . 2007. 5. . 75-83. : http://www.ashsu.org/academy/herald_info/visnyk_61_5_08/visnyk_61_5_08_7583.pdf
10. Skydan O. / . Skydan, . Yatsenko // Management theory and studies for rural business and infrastructure development: proceedings of International Scientific Conference 23 (4) / Lithuanian University of Agriculture, Faculty of
Economics and Management. Kaunas, 2010. P. 118-125. (0,4 ..).
10.08.2011
339.137.2 . . , . . , . .
-
. .
Developed theoretical-methodical recommendations on the formation of complex systems of anti-crisis marketing management at the industrial enterprises of Ukraine and reasonable measures of exiting the crisis for LTD "DAZ". The technique is based on the principles of the so-called lowcost marketing with accounting the World trends of running a department of marketing in conditions of crisis.
: , , , .
. . , . , , . , . ' . " " 80- , . , , . , ISO 9001-2001(ISO 9001:2000, IDT).
.
.
-
2011, 5, T. 1
50
- . , . - , . , . , . , . -, . . ., . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , , . . , [13]. . , . -, . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . . , . , . . - [4]. , . , . , . , , , , .
. , , . , , , . , . , , , . , , . , [1, 5].
. . . 1 . . 0 10.
1
DEFIANT
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
1.
9 9 9 9 9 8 7 8 9 8 9 9
2. 8 9 9 9 9 8 7 6 6 10 10 9
3.
9 8 7 7 7 8 6 7 7 9 9 8
4. 7 7 6 9 9 10 9 9 8 8 8 7
5. 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 6 9 9 8
6.
8 7 7 8 7 7 9 8 8 8 9 8
7. 8 8 8 10 10 9 9 9 8 8 8 8
8. 8 7 6 9 9 9 10 9 9 10 10 9
-
2011, 5, T. 1
51
, (. 1).
1 3
2 4
. 1. : 1 ; 2 ; 3 - DEFIANT; 4
. 1 , . . , , , , . ( ).
, : ; ; , ; ; ; ; ; . , . , 2012 , , , . . : 1; 2; - 3; 4; 5 (. 2). (, , ) ( ), . 5 ( , ) +5, ' , ).
2
1 - 3 - 4 - 4 -1 +4 -4 -12
2 - 4 - 5 - 4 +3 +2 -2 -10
3 - 4 - 5 - 5 -1 -3 -3 -21
4 + 5 + 4 +5 +5 +5 -3 +21
5 + 4 +3 +5 +5 +4 -3 +18
, , . ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
52
, ( , , ) . , , , , , .
, . , . , , ( 3).
3
, .
1. Jazz, Sintez, Jazz 2000 4000
2. Hussar II, Puma, Bullet,Barracuda, Cornet II,
Corvette, Grif, Brig 4000 7000
3. Stalker, Cruise, Boss, Cruise II, 7000 9000
, . , . . .
- . -moto: 100% ; ISO 9001-2001; 18 8000 ; ; ; ; ; , , ; . , , , . , 50 3 50 3. . .
. - . . , , , .
1. .. : [. ] / .., .., .. . . : , 2002. 448 .
2. .. / .. . : , 2009. 300 .
3. .. : , / .. . : ., 2009. . 246.
4. .. : [. ] / .., .. . : ., 1994. 254 .
5. .. : , , . . : ., 1994. 327 .
10.08.2011
-
2011, 5, T. 1
53
338.439:339.564:637.14 . .
. . RCA .
Expediency of forming of competitive edges of milk-processing enterprises is reasonable during realization of export activity. The basic tendencies of change of volumes and value of exports of dairy products are certain by the enterprises of region. By means of model of RCA the competitive edges of milk-processing enterprises are certain after the separate types of dairy products.
: , , , RCA .
. , . . . .
. .
. , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . . , .
. . - ; ; . : - ; - - , .
. 2009 . 6,8 % 95,3 % . . , , . , . . 1.
. 1 . , 2009 ., 2006 . 1,9 , 2008 . 1,5 . , 2008 . , 2007 . 49,65 . . , 1,5 .
. 2009 . 1,2 29,8 2006 . . . , , , . 2009 .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
54
1,9 2006 ., 2008 . 1,5 . : 1,7 , 1,8 , 73,6 .
1 (
)
2006 . 2007 . 2008 . 2009 .
% % % %
, 10229,60 100 9729,90 100 8029,45 100 10033,90 100
. .:
8630,72 84,4 8232,85 84,6 6297,69 78,4 7597,59 75,7
1579,88 15,4 1372,90 14,1 1343,34 16,7 1870,30 18,6
19,00 0,2 124,15 1,3 388,42 4,9 565,97 5,7
. , . 2009 . 8,7 .. 2006 . , 5 ( ) . 2009 . 21,24 . , 20 % .
, , . - , , , . . 2009 . 2,5 17,2 . . . , .
, , , , . 2006-2009 . , , .
, 1 . [1, . 151-155]. 1 (. 2).
2
1 , . . ( )
. .
1
, 2008 ./2007 .
49,65 2108,11 +2058,46
2009 ./2008 . +6216,08 +2998,83 +3217,25
2008 ./2007 .
764,24 2269,94 +1505,70
2009 ./2008 . +4253,58 +1835,57 +2418,01
2008 ./2007 .
+79,18 47,07 +126,25
2009 ./2008 . +1352,87 +888,74 +464,13
2008 ./2007 . +635,41 +466,75 +168,66
2009 ./2008 . +609,63 +390,68 +218,95
-
2011, 5, T. 1
55
, 2007-2008 . 49,65 . . ( 17,5 %) ( 20,7 %). , 1 2638,85 . . .
764,24 . . . 1 79,18 . . . 2009 .: 6216,08 . . 1 . , , , .
, , . , , , . , 3 5 , .
RCA (Revealed Comparative Advantages) B. Balassa [2]. RCA . , , , .
RCA, [3, . 20]:
ei ei
pi pi
F SRCA
F S ,
, eiF ; piF ; eiS
; piS .
RCA , , , . RCA , , , , , .
RCA , ; - . . , , , (. 3).
3
- ( )
2006 . 2007 . 2008 . 2009 .
-0,03 -0,06 -0,36 -0,44
0,02 0,09 -0,32 -0,60
-0,03 0,09 -0,18 -0,22
-0,06 -0,05 -0,12 -0,14
0,01 -0,11 0,14 -0,12
0,02 -0,01 0,13 0,17
0,11 0,19 0,10 0,04
0,01 -0,04 -0,12 0,20
-0,02 0,05 0,08 -0,10
-
2011, 5, T. 1
56
, . 3 , 2006-2009 . , , . , 2008 . . , (2009 .), (2007-2008 .).
2006-2009 . 15 . , 2009 . 4772 , 47,6 % , - 2433 (24,2 %) 1693 (16,9 %). , , , . : 150,1 % 2009 . 2008 ., 101,9 % 2008 . 2007 ., 121,0 % 2007 . 2006 . 2009 . 6,6 . . , 76,7 % .
- 24 % . - 2,9 . . 2009 ., 68,1 % . , , , , . , , .
. . , , , . . , . , , , .
, . , , , , , .
1. .. : [. ] / .. . : , 2003. 320 .
2. Balassa B. (1965), Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantages, The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, Vol. 32.
3. . : / . // . 2005. 6. . 1122.
14.08.2011
656.078.8 . .
- , .
-
. In the article the necessity of formation of state companies-operators of railway transportations is examined and
directions of partner relations of enterprises of railway industry with the representatives of small business are determined. : , , - .
. ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
57
, 2010-2015 , 1390 16 2009 , , , , [1]. , , , , , . .
. , , .
- .. [2], .. [3], .. [4], .. [5], .. [5], .. [6], .. [7], .. [8] . .., .., .. [9]. , , , , , , . , , - , . , - - .
. , , - , .
, - , . , - , ; .
, - , , ; , ; ; [4]. , - .
- . , , , . , , , . , , - , , , .
- , , , .
, - - , . , , ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
58
, , , , , .
. , , , 100 % . , .
, , , . , . , , , , , .
; .
, , , .
, , .
. , , , .
, , - . , , . , , , , , .
, . , - , .
- , , [10, 11]. , , - , . , - [1214]. , , - , , , [15, 16].
, - - 2404-VI, 1 2010 . , , - , , . , : , , , ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
59
, , , , - [17]. , , , , .
, , . , , , , , , - .
, - , , , , , - , .
, , . - , :
; ; ; ; ; ; ; . , , -
. , , , .
. , , , - , . , , . , - .
- , .
1. 16 2009 1390 2010-2015 [ ]. : http://www.nau.kiev.ua/index.php?page=hotline&file=311322-16122009-0.txt&code=1390-2009-?
2. .. : / .. : , 2006. 252 .
3. .. : / .. . : , 1995. 160 .
4. .. / .. // . 2007. 3. . 90-92.
5. .., .. / .. , .. // . 2008. 10. . 12-20.
6. . . / .. // . - . . . . . : . 2001. 512. . 2426.
7. . . / ..
-
2011, 5, T. 1
60
// . - . . . . . : . 2001. 512. .152154. 8. .. /
.. . : , 1994. 132 . 9. .., .., ..
/ .. , .. , .. . . : , 2008. 189 . 10. .. / .. . . : ,
2005. 316 . 11. .. - : - / ..
[ ]. : http://www.rusrand.ru/public/public_7.html 12. . . - : / . .
. : , 2009. 198 . 13. .. -
: . ... . . : 08.00.04 / .. [ ]. : http://www.dlib.com.ua/upravlinnja-derzhavno-pryvatnym-partnerstvom-na-rynku-aviatsiynykh-perevezen.html
14. .. - / .. [ ]. : http://business-consultant.com.ua/ukr/publicaciidpp301.html
15. .., .. - / .. , .. // . 2010. 32. . 25-28
16. .. : / .. [ ]. : http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/PSPE/2010_1/ Bogomolova_110.htm
17. 1 2010 2404-VI - [ ]. : http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=2404-17
15.08.2011
336.717.32 . .
,
, . . .
Deep economic recession is causing assets, capital and long-term competitiveness of financial institutions, and the situation is exacerbated by the total uncertainty on the timing of the crisis and the severe devaluation of the hryvnia. In such a situation Bank institution seeking as quickly as possible to develop a unified strategy that would help reduce potential damage to a minimum. So stream of fresh technological ideas continues to rapidly change the shape of the world's financial services industry in the balance tomorrow's priorities.
: , , , , , .
, , . , . , , , . .
, , . , .
, .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
61
: . , . , . , . , . , . , . .
.
, . , , , , -. , , . , , . . : , , . , . . , . . , , . .
. , , . , .
, , . , , . , .
, . , , .
. : , , , . , , , , . . , , (.1). , .
1
01.05.2011 ( [1])
UAH USD EUR
3 8,80 4,40 5,00
6 10,80 4,80 5,50
9 11,30 5,00 5,80
12 11,90 5,30 6,10
-, 01 2011 : , , , , , , , , , , , , -, , , , , , , . ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
62
. , , , . , .
, , , .
, . . , . . ( , ). , , .
, , , . . , , . . , , , , -, , , , , .
, . , , . , . .
, , . . , ( , , , ) .
. . , . , , .
, -. ( ) , . [2].
-
2011, 5, T. 1
63
, , , TowerGroup 2013 55 , 40 2012 . , . , , . , , , . , , .
, , , . - , .
, , , . , , , , , , , 0.5%.
, . . , - : , , , , ( 2011 ) ( 2011 ). 2010 - 126 4,2 ., 60 (.2).
2 -
31.05.2011 ( [3])
(%)
18
11
. 9
62
, , , , .
, . , , . 2009 49% , , , 12% 1.1 , 54 . [4].
, , : ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
64
, -, . , , '. , .
, , , , . . , , .
: ( ); ; ( ) ; , , . .
1. - . [ ]. : http:www.rada.gov.ua.
2. . / . // . 2010. 6. . 68. 3. - -
[ ]. : http://www.microcredit.com.ua/duf 4. . / . //
. 2004. 6. . 27 29.
15.08.2011
330. 352.3:637 . .
. , , .
The essence of the intensification of use of material resources industry and proposed a classification of sources and material cost factors as a basis to increase profitability of industrial enterprises. It is recommended to apply scientific and reasonable system of factors, which subsequently used in the formation and performance standards, and material costs as a basis of planning and promotion of efficient use of material resources industry.
: , , , .
. , , , . . , .
. .
. , . , [18].
- , ' . 50 60-
-
2011, 5, T. 1
65
. . , . . , . . , . . - . , , ' , , , , , .
. , .
. , , , , , . , , , .
, . ' , , , . , , . , , , .
, : , ' , . , . , , . , .
, , , , , , .
, :
1) ;
2) , ;
3) , ; 4) ,
; 5) ,
, ; 6) ,
. ,
. . , , , , (, , , , , ), , , . , , , .
, , , . . ', , , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
66
, , , ( ) . , , ( ..), , , , .
. . , [8], , - , , .
. [6] , , . . , , , , . , .
, , . , , , .
. . [5]. . . , , , , , , .
. '. , : ; ; () ; ; .
, , . , : ; ; ; , . .
, , , ; , , , , , . - , , , , .
, , (. 1):
1) : ) :
, ; , , ;
) : , , , ;
) , : , , , , .;
2) : ) :
-
2011, 5, T. 1
67
, , , .;
) : , , , , ;
) ( '): , , ;
) : - , , , ;
- ; - ; - ,
- ; - ; - ;
-
- ; - ; - ; -
. 1.
3) : ) : ; ) : , , ; ) : , ; ) : ,
, . .
(. 1):
1
()
-
2011, 5, T. 1
68
.
, .
1. . . : - / . . . . : - , 2004. 345 .
2. . . : [ ] / . . . . : , 2009. 198 .
3. . . : [] / . . . . : - , 2005. 290 .
4. . . / . . . .: . , 2002. 568 .
5. . . / . . . . : , 1960. 365 .
6. .. / .. // . 2000. 30, 31, 43. 7. Chernenko A. F. Financial situation and enterprise resource use efficiency: monograph / A. F.
Chernenko. M. : Finance and statistics, 2009. 207 p. 8. ..
/ .. , .. // : . 2008. 3 (3). . 136145.
16.08.2011
331.522.4.009.12 . .
, .
This article represents necessity of human capital formation and development as a major factor of national competitiveness, analysis of main indicators of level evaluation and development conditions of human capital is conducted. The necessity of human capital development for overcoming economic crisis and its consequences is defined
: , , , .
' . , . , - , . , , , .
. . , . , . , . . : . . , . , . , . , . . , , . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . . , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
69
. , , , . , .
. , , , .
. ' , . , . , , . , , , [1, . 7-8], , , , , , , , .
, , , , . " 2010-2011" (Global Competitiveness Report), , 139 7 . 89 3,9, 4,18, , , 9 12 [2, . 334]. (4,61), (4,57), (4,51), (4,38), (4,24). (5,63), . (5,56), [2]. , 4- , , (. 1).
1
2010-2011 .
89 -7 1 2 4 39 93
3,9 -0,05 5,63 5,56 4,9 4,51 3,8
1 : 134 -14 7 2 40 54 69
2 : 68 +10 6 10 15 72 73
3 : 132 -26 5 14 87 61 130
4 : ' 66 +2 7 18 42 39 73
5 : 46 0 4 2 9 26 90
6 : 129 -20 4 5 26 45 64
7 : 54 -5 2 18 4 53 31
8 : 119 -13 8 13 31 32 108
9 : 83 -3 7 1 17 47 98
10 : 38 -9 36 34 1 21 107
11 : 100 -9 4 2 8 50 111
12 : 63 -1 2 5 1 54 125
. 134 139. 12 26 2009 . ( 134 66 52 25 )
-
2011, 5, T. 1
70
(96 24 ). (134 ) [2, . 335].
- , . , , . , , , . , , , , , , , , . . . . , [3], , (), , , : , ; , , ; , , .
2010 . " : ", `, 1970 , 135 , , 95% 169- [4]. , , , , :
- , , ;
- , ;
- () , , , , . 1,7 104 , , 1,3 , $ 1,25 [5].
, , , , , , , , (. 2).
2
2010 . [4, . 152-155]
/
1. 0,938 0,876 0,927 0,919 0,788
2. 0,937 0,864 0,934 0,982 0,702
4. 0,902 0,799 0,886 0,863 0,667
9. 0,885 0,824 0,934 0,825 0,726
44. 0,783 0,693 0,752 0,804 0,551
61. 0,732 0,664 0,716 0,683 0,599
69. 0,710 0,652 0,685 0,795 0,509
87. 0,669 0,493 0,520 0,647 0,355
89. 0,663 0,511 0,714 0,453 0,412
92. 0,654 0,516 0,706 0,491 0,396
128. 0,470 0,320 0,354 0,369 0,252
169. 0,140 0,098 0,281 0,416 0,008
-
2011, 5, T. 1
71
2010 0,71, 69 169 . , 1990 2010 . 1 , 2 , 2 . 27 % [5].
, , . , , , . 2010 . 0,652 8 % . "" , , 14 12 % [5]
() 8 % , 92 % ( 96 % ). 62 %, 73 %. 0,463, 2008 44 138 . - 0,174, 0,209, 0,212, 0,228 () [4, c. 156].
(): ( ) 2 % , 1 % . () , , , 36 . , , , , 0,008. "" , , 0,002 0,005 [5].
. 6535 . 9 , 58810 . , 6 , 38692 . 2,7 , 17803 . [4, c. 143]. (. 3).
3
[4, c. 161, c. 176]
2000-2008 .
(%)
(%)
(%) (%) (%)
36. 0,003 3,8 0,1 4,5 0,0 -
48. 0,001 1,3 0,1 1,6 1,1 5,9
69. 0,008 1,2 6,2 2,1 0,2 19,5
2006-2009 .
, (0
, 10- )
(%
)
(%
)
(%
)
2. 7,9 91 82 85
18. 7,3 89 88 84
36. 5,7 83 69 43
48. 5,4 79 63 33
69. 5,3 71 55 23
, 6,2 % 2,1 %. 19,5 %, .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
72
, , . , , , .
, , 71 1970 . 69 2010; 69 67; 71 70. , , 475 . , 4763, 797, 1035, 1626 [4, c. 197-198].
, 99,7 %, 79,4 % [4, . 193]. , , , . , 14,6 % [4, c. 189].
. , , , , . :
- ; -
; -
; -
.
, , - , . .
- , .
1. 2010. . i , 2010. 162 .
2. The Global Competitiveness Report 20102011 : [ / . . (Klaus Schwab)]. World Economic Forum within the framework of the Centre for Global Competitiveness and Performance 2010. 516 .
3. .. / . . // . 2009. 4. . 37 40.
4. 2010. : . (). - , 2010. 244 c.
5. 2010 : 69- 169 [ ]. : http://www.un.org.ua/ua/information-centre/news/1243 ( 10.05.2011)
10.08.2011
-
2011, 5, T. 1
73
366 (477) . .
. .
-
-
. , , - , - : - , . , .
Questions in relation to the role of budgets in providing of socio-economic development of region and their influence are reflected on forming of tax potential in the modern terms of development of the tax system of Ukraine. Basic attention is spared to conceptual approaches of researches first of all of socio-economic essence of budget, his role in realization socially - economic processes in a region and their influence on forming of tax potential : implementation of socio-economic and political tasks, realization of measures on a management a region and determination of basic directions of influence on providing of sufficient volume of tax receivabless. An analysis over of results of researches of home and foreign scientists is brought on questions the separate ingredients of budget of education, and an analysis is conducted tax payment to the budgets of all levels on the Khmelnytsk area.
: , , , , , , .
. .
, , , , , , , , , , , , .
, , . , , .
- , - : - , .
. .
. . , .
.. , , , : , , - . - . , , , .., .., .., .., .. . , , , , , , (), [3].
-
2011, 5, T. 1
74
.. , . , . , . , ., . . [2, 4] [2, 4]; , [2, 4]; , [2, 4].
. , . , , , , , , ( ). , , , . , , .
, , , , .
, 2010 , , 1857,5 , 101,6% 2009 . 721,7 . (. 1) ( 85,39%), 1135,8 . ( 115,5%). [6].
721,71135,8
. ..
. 1. 2010
100,6%, 2,4 . . 2 2010 ., . , , , 74%. 843,2 . . , 2%. 109% ( 119%), 103% ( 103%), 109% ( 108%), 107% ( 103%) (. 2).
2010 . ,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
75
, .
, , , ' .
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
110
2010
2009
. 2.
, . .
: , . , .
, , .
. - . , , , , . - . , . , . , , , , , .
, ' . , . - .
1. 2 2010 . 2755-VI 2. .. : , , / ..
, 2001. 304 . 3. .. (, , ) / . . . :
, 2000.
-
2011, 5, T. 1
76
4. .. / .. // . 2003. 4(22). . 86 90.
5. . . : . / . . , . . . . : , 2006. 456 .
6. - [ ]. : htt / / www . sta .gov.ua.
10.08.2011
338.242.2 . . , . .
-
.
.
This article contains the results of research on internal and external environment of the organization. By considering the integral evaluation of external and internal environment and provides algorithms for identifying factors enhance the internal environment during the economic crisis.
: , , , , .
, . , , . , , . , , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , .. [13]. , , . . , .
.
, , , , . , .
, . ( ) ( ) [1].
, , () .
( , ), , , , - , , .
, , .
. , , . , , , , , . , .
. .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
77
. , , . , .
- . - , , . , .
. , , , , , -.
. , , , , . , .
. , , , , , .
, , . :
- , , , ; - ; - (, ,
); - ; - .
.
. , . , . , .
, , . , , . , :
- , ( , , , , Internet);
- ; - ; - . SWOT- ( : strength ,
weakness , opportunities , threats ) [2]. , ,
, .
SWOT-, , .
: - , - , - , - .
, . , , , . , , , , , . . , , , , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
78
() ().
SWOT- , .
, 1, ; 1,2,3ijX x i n j , (n
), :
- ( : 3 , 2 , 1 );
- (3 , 2 , 1 , 0 );
- (+1 , 1 ).
: 3
1
i ij
j
I x
, - .
SWOT- :
, -, .
.
, -
.
.
, .
.
:
- ;
- ;
- ;
- ;
- ;
- - .
, ,
.
,
.
, ,
, - ,
-
.
,
. ' , :
, ,
.
.
, ,
, ()
, .
, . ,
.
() ,
, .
:
, ,
, ,
-
;
-
2011, 5, T. 1
79
, ;
,
, ,
.
.
:
1. , ,
. : ,
, .
, ', ,
.
2. . ;
.
3. .
, , ..
.
4.
. ,
: , ,
..
5. . ,
, , .
, , , ' ,
, , , I.
'
' , ,
, , , ,
.
() ,
, : ,
' , ;
, .
.
, :
.
.
:
- ;
- ;
- .
1. . , . , , , / .
. : , 2008. 354 .
2. . . / . . , . . . . : -, 2000.
182 .
3. . . -
/ . . . : , 2004. 180 .
22.08.2011
-
2011, 5, T. 1
80
65.012.4 (477) . .
, .
On the basis of selection and survey of existing approaches proposed definition andreasonable nature of the category of "economic potential of the enterprise"which featuresafocuson preserving long-term competitiveness through strategic development of theconcretized forming system elements.
: , , , , .
. , . , , , , , , , , . , , , .
, . , , , 1990 . , , , , , , , , .
, . .. , .. , .., .. , .. , .. , .. , . . . , .. (2009 .) , ' ' .
. ' , , , , , . , , , .
. , , , , , , , , , . - , , , , . , , , - , - .
, (. 1).
, . 1 . , , . .. , , , .. , , , , , ', [4].
-
2011, 5, T. 1
81
-
-
. 1.
, .. , .. , .. , .. , .. , , . , , . , .. , , , . , , .. , , ' [1]. , .. .. .
, , , ' . , - ( ) . , -. - , , , , , , , , .
, , , . , , , (, ) .
, , , , (, , ) , , , , [3].
(.. ), . , . , - . , , - , , , [2].
.. , . , , , , , , , , , , .
., , , , (potentialoutput) ' (), . , ' .. , .. , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
82
, , ' , , (), . , . , , , . . 2.
- -
-
, ,
, , ,
. 2.
() , , , - , , , , , , . , , - , .
, , , , , , , , . .. , , , . .. , , , . , . , .
, . , , , , , . , , , , ' , , .
( ) . . , , . , , 12 '. , , , -, -, . . , ? , . , (
-
2011, 5, T. 1
83
'), , ' . , , . , , , ' .
. ' , , , , , . , . , , , . , . , , , .
1. . / . // . . 2004. 10. . 712.
2. .. / .. : "", 2007. 358 .
3. .. : [ ] / .. , .. . : - , 2003. 96 .
4. .. / .. // . . 2001. 10. . 1418.
18.08.2011
65. 018: (477) . .
. The main approaches to the interpretation of the concept of "competitiveness" and the basic factors of its providing have
been defined. : , , .
. . , , , , .
. , . , . , . . , . , . , . , . , . , . , . . .., .., . ., . ., ., ., ., . ., . ., . ., . ., .
. , , . , , , , . , , .
. .,
-
2011, 5, T. 1
84
, , , , , , , , () .
. . , . . . . . . ., , , , , [1].
. , , , . [2].
. . , - , . . . , . .. , . . , . . : , , , , , . . . , . . , .
, , , , 102 . , , , , - .
, , . , , , - .
, , : -, , , , --, -, -.
, , , : , ; - , ; ; . . , , , .
-
2011, 5, T. 1
85
: , , , , , -, , [2]. : , , , , , , , .