GeOIoTWorld2016

Creatingahybridmonitoringnetworkofglobalprocessesofnaturalandman-madedisastersontheplanetEarth,usinggeo-technologiesoftheInternetofthings(GeoIoT).

•Prof.SarianV.K.,ScienceConsultant,Organisation:FederalStateUnitaryEnterpriseRadioResearchandDevelopmentInstitute(FSUENIIR).Russia•Dr.NazarenkoA.P.,DirectorCenter-DeputyDirectorGeneral,Organisation:(FSUENIIR),Russia•Prof.LyubushinA.A.Headoflaboratory,Organisation:InstituteofPhysicsoftheEarthRussianAcademyofSciencesRussia

Брюссель25мая2016г

Content

1. Theneedtofindnewsolutionstoradicallyimprovethepredictivecapacityofexistingprocessesforglobalmonitoringsystems.

2. Theneedformultidisciplinaryresearch.3. Thenewparadigmofpersonalized

managementofdisaster.4. ThepossibilityofusingGeOIoTforthe

monitoringandmanagementofnaturaldisasterswithnature.

2

1.The need to find new solutions...

• Everyyear,emergencysituationsofnaturalcharacter(suchasearthquakesandfloods)aresourcesofexcessivelylargematerialandhumanlossesindifferentpartsoftheEarth.Inthiscasethelossisequallyhighforbothdevelopedanddevelopingcountries.

• Therefore,theinternationalcommunityandindividualcountriespaygreatattentiontothedevelopmentandoperationoftheglobalprocessesofmonitoringsystems.

3

1. The need to find new solutions ...

• However,themeasurestakencannotyetimprovethepredictivecapacityofexistingsystemstotheeconomicvalueandeachtimeanotherdisasterisacatastrophicsurpriseforboththeadministrationandfortheentirepopulationoftheareainwhichemergencyhappened.Itshouldbenotedthatnaturaldisasterisoftenaccompaniedbyaman-madedisaster.Particularlylargelosses-inlargecities.

1. The need to find new solutions ...Itisnecessarytotakeintoaccountanothercauselargelossesforcountries

thatareexposedtoshocksandman-madedisastersofnaturalorigin.ThefactthattheeffortsofStatesinthedevelopmentoftoolsformonitoringandpreventionofemergencysituationsariseareoftenineffectiveascitizenswhofindthemselvesintheemergencyarea,andevenwarningsaboutemergenciesbecomehelpless,immediatelyforgetalltheinstructionsandasaresult,areoftenthevictimsoftheseemergencies.Thisphenomenon,asarule,thefurtheranalysisofdisasterqualifiesasa"humanfactor".Moreover,weemphasizeagain,thisphenomenonisequallycharacteristicofbothdevelopedanddevelopingcountries.SufficeittorecalltherecenttragiceventsinJapan,theUS,China,Russia,SouthKorea,Guatemala,Pakistan,Taiwanandothers.

6

7

1. The need to find new solutions

Consideringrapidurbanization(UNpredictsabout78%of

theworld'spopulation(6.3billionpeople)willliveincitiesby2050)and

thehugecoststhatarespentintheworldonthescienceoftheearth,andonthedevelopmentofsystems(includingICT)monitoringofglobalprocesses,

MOEeffortsHumanitycannolongerputupwiththepoor

resultsobtainedandurgentlyrequiresthesearchfornewsolutions.

8

• Backgroundpossiblesolutions:• Thesearchformethodsofdetectionsignals,

harbingersofglobalprocesses.• Researchtheimpactofglobalprocesseson

livingandinertobjectsofnature.• Developmentofmodelsofaparticular

disasterataparticularfacility.• DevelopmentofICT-GeOIoT.

9

2. The need for interdisciplinary research

2. The need for interdisciplinary research

CombiningtheachievementsofvariousscientificdisciplinesthroughacommonnetworkwiththeuseofinfocommunicationGeoIoTasasignal-harbingersofdisasterindicatorstoradicallyimprovethepredictivepotentialofglobalprocessesofmonitoringsystems.

10

3.TechnologybreakthroughsthatwouldallowtheGeOIoT(1):

• convergenceofcommunicationnetworks,includingsensor

networksintoasingleinfocommunicationmedium(ICS).UbiquitousaccesstomainstreamuserstobroadbandchannelssingleX(intheRussianFederationistheRussianCommunicationsAdministrationprogramforthedeploymentoffiber-opticcommunicationchannelsthroughouttheterritoryofRF-program2020).TransitiontothenewsystemofassigningIPaddresses-IPv6,whichprovidesvirtuallyunlimitedaccessIoTintoasingleIP-basedICS.

11

1. Thedevelopmentandpracticaluseoflargedataprocessing(database).

2. Thedevelopmentandpracticaluseofcloudcomputing(OS).

3. TransitionserviceprovidersforbroadbandTV(LTEstandards,etc.).

4. technologydevelopment,productionanduseofwirelesssensornetworks.

5. Rapidmassintellectualizationofsubscriberdevices.6. DevelopmentGeOsystems.

12

3. Technological breakthroughs that would allow the Geo IoT (2).

13

It is necessary to allocate three temporary stage, around which all the existing systems are built: Monitoring and prediction of the disaster - the time before the disaster. The catastrophe - the catastrophe. Consequence - the time after the accident.

3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster

14

Beforedisaster

Predictionofemergency

DuringEmergenciesGeneral

warningonemergencies

AfterEmergencyCoordinationRescue

Existing security systems operating before and after the disaster, almost no controlled rescue of people during the

course of emergency, while the greatest loss of population are taking place during the course of an

emergency.

tt0 tk

3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster

15

•ItisimpossibletopreventeveryCHC-conceptofanon-zerorisk.•Peopledonotrememberordonotknowhowtobesavedataspecifictypeofemergency.•Withoutexternalassistance(management)peopleinemergencysituationsoftenmakebaddecisions.•thesalvationofeveryhumanbeingshouldbemanaged,takingintoaccountitsindividualcharacteristics.

3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster

16

userGroups Individualcharacteristics

Guestsbuilding Gender,age,healthcategory

Residentsofthebuilding Jobresponsibilities

Personswithdisabilities Specialneeds(hearinglimitations,visionandabilitytomove)

3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster

17

•Inthefirststage(beforethedevelopmentofthecatastrophicphase)needemergencycenterinvolvementinthemanagementofpersonalsalvationofeachindividualonthesiteshouldbeminimized

•Duetothefactthatincaseofanemergencycenterresourcesmaynotbeavailable,youneedasmuchaspossibletocarryoutactiontosavelocally,takingintoaccountthespecificityofplacesandpeople

3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster

Gettingemergency-emergency

sensorsdetectingphysical

quantities

Timeofpublicannouncementof

emergency

awarenessofthe

importanceoftime(score)

thedangerofthisperson

Timeofthecatastrophicphase

EndTimecatastrophic

phase

Timeoftheworkofrescuersatthe

site

t

t0 t1 t2 t3=k t4 t5

t

ExistingSystems

SystemsbasedonITt<t0

18

Phases of emerging situation

3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster

Implementationofanewparadigmofpersonalizedcontrolthebehaviorofpeoplewhofindthemselvesatthefacilityintheemergencyarea,itwaspossiblewhenusing:GeOIoTassensorsobjectenvironment,-IntelligentsubscriberunitstocommunicatewithsensorsGeOIoT,locatedinthisfacility,-DevelopmentOfmodelsofspecificemergencysituationsatthefacility,createddivisionsMOE.

3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster

Внимание,в13-йквартирена7-мэтажепроизошловозгорание!

Увасесть10минут,чтобыпокинутьпомещение!

― OrganizationofindependentpersonalevacuationpanicPreventionHelpintheorganizationofrescueoperationsSavingupto90%ofthepeoplebeforetheonsetofacatastrophicdisasterphase

DevelopmentResearchInstituteofRadio

Системазащищена10патентами

Goldmedalatthe13thMoscowInternationalSalon"Archimedes2010"Inventions

Goldmedalandaspecialprizeforthebestinventionoftheyearatthe38thInternationalExhibitionofInventionsinGenevain2010

3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster

― Thebuilding(object)issetself-organizing(touch)theIoTnetworkofsensorstomonitorphysicalparameters(temperature,smoke,etc.)

― IoTcanbeintegratedwithexistingsensors

22

Incontrasttoexistingsecuritysystemsrunningbeforeand/orafteradisaster,theproposed

systemprovidesdynamicpersonalizedmanagementofevacuationofpeopledirectly

duringemergencies.

Beforeemergencycontrolroomsettings

AfterEmergencyCoordinationRescue

DuringEmergenciesDynamicmanagementofevacuation

3. A new paradigm of individualized management disaster

But the system of individualized management of saving people when disaster occurs, powerless, if the time interval between the beginning of emergency and the start of its catastrophic phase approaches zero. And this value is typical for such devastating disasters such as earthquakes, which bring the greatest human and material losses.

4.Possibility to use of IoT for monitoring and control in disasters of natural origin.

Professor Lyubushin A.A.- Head of the Laboratory of the Institute of Physics of the Earth RAS. O. Schmidt in his work suggested that the detection of these signals, the precursors can be reliably carried out (and thus increase the predictive capacity), if we compare the real-time synchronization of sensor readings by different physical nature, located close to the sensors of existing monitoring systems, sensors with readings of these systems. We assumed that for this purpose the best suited IoT.

4.Possibility to use of IoT for monitoring and control in disasters of natural origin.

The basic idea of the use of sensors of other physical nature (IoT) for synchronization is that the signals -predvestniki accidents are a common modulating signal for sensors of different physical nature.

4.Possibility to use of IoT for monitoring and control in disasters of natural origin.

The sensors GeO IoT (as defined) may be used any living (including humans) and objects stagnant nature.In the basic sciences have accumulated a lot of the results of studies of the influence of global processes on living and inert objects that can be used to search for GeO IoT, the most sensitive to certain types of signal-precursors.

4.Possibility to use GeO IoT for the monitoring and management of natural disasters with nature.

Theexistingfacilitymonitoringofnatural

processes

SelectedGeOIoTsensors-otherobjects

SelectedGeOIoT-trees

sensors,etc.

SelectedGeOIoTsensors-animals,etc..

SelectedGeOIoTisamanof

sensors

TransferforecastingresultsdirectlyontheindividualizedsystemManagementDisaster

27

Centre

4.PossibilitytouseGeOIoTforthemonitoringandcontrolofnaturaldisasterswiththecharacterinthewayofintegrationofgeosciencesandtheInternetofthings.

4. Finding suitable GeO IoT as sensor signals, harbingers of global natural disasters

Giventhefactthatamongtheobjectsofnaturethereisanenormousamountofobjectsthatexhibitincreasedsensitivitytocertainchangesintheenvironmentsettings,thereisahighprobabilityoffindingamongthemsuitablenaturalsensors.Thechoiceofsuchsensorscanbecarriedoutonlywiththehelpofscientistswhostudytheimpactofchangesintheparametersoftheexternalenvironmentontheparametersofnaturalobjects.Sincetheearlystagesofaglobaldisasterofnaturalorman-madeoriginmayoccuratthesametimequitealotsignalov-precursorsemergenciesofvaryingintensity,itisthereforeproposedtousethejointGeOIoTsensor(iepanel,consistingofdifferenttypesofnaturalsensorsGeOIoT,someofwhichunderrealcircumstancesmayhavemoresensitivedatasignals-predvestnikamthantheother)tocomplementthesensors,theexistingmonitoringsystemsfortheglobalprocessesofnaturalandtechnogenicorigin.

28

Itissupposedtocreatetwoexperimentalplotsofthenetwork:KamchatkaandinArmenia.InstituteofApplied

Physics,NationalAcademyofSciencesofArmeniahasappliedforthejobinSkolkovo.ItisexpectedthatthisworkwillcarryyoungstaffIPPF,VernadskyInstitute,NIIR,IPERAS,IEERAS

4.Possibility to use GeO IoT for the monitoring and management of natural disasters with nature

ThankyouforattentionSpeakerSarianViliam,Professor,HonoredWorkerof

CommunicationsofRussia.StatePrizeofRussiawinner,has2prizesoftheRussianGovernmentinscienceandtechnology,professorattheMoscowInstituteofPhysicsandTechnology(StateUniversity)andtheMoscowTechnicalUniversityof

CommunicationsandInformatics.

30