+ aera april 16, 2012 crpbis: an equity-oriented systemic change model to address minority...
TRANSCRIPT
+
AERAApril 16, 2012
CRPBIS:An Equity-oriented Systemic Change Model to Address Minority Disproportionality
Aydin Bal, PhD.University of Wisconsin- Madison
+Wisconsin CRPBIS Collaboration
+
CRPBIS Implementation: A of State-Wide Action of Developmental Transfer
The ultimate goal of the CRPBIS framework is to facilitate positive, safe, supportive, inclusive, and democratic school cultures via ecologically fit, locally meaningful, sustainable, and socially just systemic transformation efforts.
+
Research Partners: UW-Madison & WCER Elizabeth Kozleski – Arizona State University Kathleen King Thorius – IUPUI-Indianapolis
Consultants George Sugai-University of Connecticut Alfredo Artiles - Arizona State University
Advisory Board Gloria Ladson-Billings –University of Wisconsin-Madison, a
student with EBD identification, a parent of student with disability, and a DPI representative
UW-Madison Research Team
CRPBIS Collaboration
+Disproportionality at the intersection of Race, Language, & Ability
Unequal proportions of CLD students in high incidence disability categories (i.e., LD, mild- MR, E/BD, and speech-language impairments) & gifted and talented education programs (Donovan & Cross, 2002; Heller, Holtzman, & Messick, 1982; Johnson, 1969)
Male low-income AA and NA students are the most affected groups at the national level (Donovan & Cross, 2002)
Disproportionality: low expectation, stigma, racial segregation, negative outcomes in SPED (Heller, Holtzman, & Messick, 1982)
+ Racialization of School Discipline
Racialization of discipline: Minority students are punished more severely for less serious more subjective reasons such as disrespect (Skiba et al., 2008)
Punitive and exclusionary discipline: Exclusion, academic failure, high-school dropout, and involvement in the juvenile delinquency system (Leone et al., 2003)
AA students:18 % of the student population - 46 %of those suspended and 39 % of all expulsions.
AA students with disabilities: 21 % of the total numbers of students w/ disabilities - 44 % of those w/ disabilities subject to mechanical restraints, like being strapped down (Office of Civil Rights, 2012).
+Spatio-temporal Context : Disproportionality by Race and Disability
High Incidence Disabilities (ED+LD+MR) 2006-2007
Risk Ratio: African American vs. Whites
http://nccrest.eddata.net/maps/index.php
(Source: NCCRESt, 2011)
+Spatiotemporal Context of Disproportionality
MADISON, WIhttp://nccrest.eddata.net/city7/index.php
(Source: NCCRESt, 2007)
+District-wide Special Education Risk
+Relative Risk – African-American Students
+Relative Risk – Native-American Students
+Relative Risk – Hispanic Students
+
School-wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBIS): Challenges and Possibilities
+
(Reprinted from pbis.org)
+
(Bal, 2011)
+Existing Cultural Responsiveness in PBIS: 1. Cultural Awareness 2. Disaggregated Date 3. Family Involvement
(Bal, 2011)
+
(Reprinted from Artiles, 2007)
Historicity
AgencyExpansive Learning
Contradictions
Space
Transformation
+
(Cole & Engeström, 1996)
(Bal, 2011)
+ A Systemic Change Methodology:Local to Global Justice
A mixed research methodology of formative intervention (Engeström, 1987; 2008; 2011)
Re-mediating school cultures
Facilitating a equitable, sustainable, and locally meaningful systemic transformation via Learning Labs
Infusing culturally responsive research-based practices into 4 key tenets of culturally neutral PBIS
+ CRSPBIS Implementation Processes
Inside-out & Outside-in 1. Forming CRPBIS Learning Labs
2. Determining Desired Outcomes of CRPBIS
3. Understanding Cultural Mediation and Implementing Culturally Responsive Practices
4. Using Data for Continuous Improvement and Innovation
5. Ongoing Systemic transformation
+ CRPBIS Learning Labs
Before a major systemic transformation
All stakeholders
5-10 consecutive sessions & monthly follow sessions
Primary stimulus: Daily problems and disruptions
Secondary Stimulus: CHAT theory, map rich data representation, new assessment and data analysis instruments, evidence-based culturally responsive practices, video recordings of lab sessions…
New solutions are developed and tested locally
Formation of a new shared tools, rules, and divisions of labor
+
(Engeström, 2010)(Engeström, 2010)
+Spatiotemporal Patterns & Predictors of Disproportionality in Wisconsin
Primary Research Questions: To what extent are CLD students represented in EBD
category and suspension/expulsions? To what extent is individual risk predicted by individual
and/or district sociodemographic factors?
Wisconsin state level data from 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2010-2011
Hierarchical linear modeling (hlm)
+Disproportionality
Dependent Variables Student Level Predictor variables
District Level predictor variables
Proportion of students identified with EBD
Gender % youth with free or reduced lunch status
Proportion of students who are suspended or expelled from school
Race/ethnicity % minority enrollment
% ELL enrollment
% school attendance
% proficient/advanced on state math test
% proficient/advanced on state reading test
+
AERAApril 16, 2012
CRPBIS:An Equity-oriented Systemic Change Model to Address Minority Disproportionality
Aydin Bal, PhD.University of Wisconsin- Madison