drdi 8 development research center discussicn papers no. 18 the allocative consequences of economics...

65
DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior, Pap?.. arc prelirni~lary rrateri-lr; clrcuinteJ lo stimulate discussior~ an(', critic21 cni- men^. Kcfel-PI rc.s in yuhlica t ir\n to Discussion !'npcrs s!:ould bc cleared wii 1, t:;[-. autllar(s) to protect .. . the tcl~tative character of t!it:se paper:,. ~i-c rs;~>rs rxpr-c3ss tl~e viczws of the alltilor a.:d slic:~ld not bc incerl~rctci! to I ~flcct ri~osc of the. World Bank. Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

Upload: others

Post on 13-May-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

DRDI 8

Development Research Center

Discuss icn P a p e r s

No. 18

The A l l o c a t i v e Consequences of Economics of Sca le

Larry E . Westphal and Yung W . Rhee

January 19 7.6 L

KOTE: Discussior, Pap?.. a r c p re l i rn i~ la ry r r a t e r i - l r ; c l r c u i n t e J l o s t i m u l a t e d i s c u s s i o r ~ an(', c r i t i c 2 1 cni- men^. Kcfel-PI rc.s i n yuhl ica t i r \n t o Discuss ion ! 'npcrs s!:ould b c c l ea red w i i 1 , t:;[-. a u t l l a r ( s ) t o p r o t e c t .. . the t c l ~ t a t i v e c h a r a c t e r of t!it:se paper:,. ~ i - c rs ;~>rs rxpr-c3ss t l ~ e viczws of the alltilor a.:d slic:~ld not bc i n c e r l ~ r c t c i ! to I ~ f l c c t r i ~ o s c of the. World B a n k .

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Page 2: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

I n t he c o n t e x t of a l l o c a t i n g i n v e s t n e n t r e soLrce s anong projects, t h i s pa?er a d d r e s s e s t h e q u e s t i o n " ~ o e s i n t e rde7endence due rc e:cnoniss of s c a l e ' m a t t e r ' ? " A s t a t i c , z i x e d i n t e g e r prograrrxing :ode1 o f t h e mcchani:al eng inec r i xg s e c t o r i s used. Th i s model was o r i g i n a l l y cons t ruc r ed a s a d e v i c s t o o h t a i a en i n i t i a l comparative advanEage r ank ing of p roduc t i on a c t i v i t i e s p r i o r t3 t h e desi-gn 05 spc- c i f i c p r o j e c t s i n t h e Republ ic of Korea. Here i t is employed, f i rs : , t o n e a s u r e n m e r i c a l l y t h e d e g r e e of i ~ c r e a s i n g r e t u r n s and t h e n a t u r e of i n t e rdependence w i t h i n t h e s e c t o r and, second , t o e s t h t e t h e c o s t of n e g l e c t i n g i n t e rdependence when p l a n n i n g r e s o u r c e a l l o c a t i o n . Tne pape r conc ludes t h a t t h e a l l o c a t i v e con- sequences o f econonies o f s c a l e are f a r l e s s s i g n i f i c a n t t h a n h a s p robab ly been supposed, b u t t h a t t h e y a r e n o n e t h e l e s s g r e a t enough t o w a r r a n t t h e :fie of progran- n i n g methods r a t h e r t h a n c o n v e n t i o n a l b e n e f i t - c o s t p r o j e c t a p p r a i s a l t e c h n i q u e s .

It I s w i d e l y r ecogn i zed t h a c conven t i ona l b e n e f i t - c o s t p r o j e c t q p p r a i s a l

t e chn iques % f a i l t o y i e l d a n e f f i c i e n t a l l o c a t i o n of r e s o u r c e s when a p p l i e d .* .

t o p r a j e c t s c h a r a c t e r i z e d by economies of s c a 1 e . l ' m e t h e r i n f a c t economies of

s c a l e do have such a l l o c a t i v e consequences i s a n m p i r i c a l i s s u e t h a t depends

upon t h e c h a r a c t e r o f t h e i n t e r d e p e n d e n c i e s anong p r o d u c t i o r ~ activities w i t h i n a

p a r t i c u l a r set of c i rcumstances .2 ' Th i s paper e m p i r i c a l l y e s t i m a t e s t h e a l l o c a t i v e

consequences o f e conon i e s of s c a l e u s i n g a n e x p e r i m e n t a l n o d e l developed i n cbn-

n e c t i o n w i t h p l a n n i n g t h e expans ion of t h e of Korea ' s mechanical e n g i n e e r i n g

s e c t o r . / I t i s o rgan i zed as fo l l ows : The model i s d e s c r i b e d i n t h e nex t s e c c i o n ,

a f t e r which pa r ame te r e s t i m a t e s f o r Korea a r e used t o i n v e s t i g a t e t h e d e g r e e o f

i n c r e a s i n g r e t u r n s and t h e c h a r a c t e r of i ~ ~ t e r d e p e n d e n c e w i t h i n t h e s e l c t o r . S o l u t i o n s

t o t h e model a r e used i n t h e t h i r d s e c t i o n t o estimate t h e c o s t of n e g l e c t i n g i n-

t e rdependence , and t h e c o n c l u s i o n c o n s i d e r s t h e r o b u s t n e s s o f t h e e s t i m a t e s o b t a i n e d . , I

L

* The a u t h o r s a r e r c s p e c f i v ~ i y a f f i l i a t e d w i t h t h e Dcvelopnent Economics De;arrxcnt - - and t h e Development Research Cente r of t h e T n t e r n a c i o n a l 5ank f o r R e c o n s t r u c t i o n 2nd

'1 Development, Washington, D C . The views exp re s sed i n t h i s paper a r e t h o s e of ' k c a u t h o r s and n o t n e c e s s a r i l y t h o s e of t h e Bank. 'ITr~is pape r waz presei l ted ai t h e - - Econometr ic S o c i e t y S e s s i o n t i t l e d " ~ o m ~ a r l s o n s of Econes ic S r u c t u r e , " 1 9 7 5 , ASSA

%! X e e t i n ~ s . . - L

1/ See, f o r exan.ple, Chenery (1955) . The s t a t e cf tltc: a r t i n p r o j e c t dpprnis:; t=.:!:~;<~~!?s - i s ap:ly d i s c u s s e d i-n t h e r - c e n t aanr:als by 1 - i r t i c . 2 . ~ ~ e ' . : i r r lces ( lCI65)nxd L";I._L' 11572:.

2 / See V~stphnl. ( 1 9 7 5 ) , p a r ~ ~ c i l l t r - i . y S e c t i c ~ . 5. T(\ c.<::tX there h-i-vc b ~ 0 1 , v e r y f c ~ ; - attemy,:s t c ~ e s s u z - e ea ; l i r i ca l iy chese con:;eque:x\ L,. Ti;,, p r c t r i o u s . > t ~ d i t - s a r c t h o s e by we,ctphal (1971) and ?ianue ( 1 9 7 3 ) .

3 1 -4 f ; ~ ? l r c 2 - r t or, :I:$.; -.,ode1 i s g iven i n Wcstp!?aI r.:?? "n.cc. (19;' I , x h i c ! ~ is ~ . . ~ . i i l - -- rlhle o - : r , . ? q ~ ~ c ~ s t .

Page 3: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

I. A Ycdel of t h e r.iechanica1 E n g i n e e r i n g S e c t o r

A tesm of economis t s and e n g i n e e r s des igned and irri3lemented t h e n c d e l , whic5

Tas o ~ i g i n a l l y i n t e n d e d as zn e x p e r i n e n t a l s c r e e n i n g d e v i c e t o o b t a i n an i n i t i a l

c c x p a r a t i v e

p r o j e c t s . A/ a d v a n t a g e rank ing of p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s p r i o r t o t h e d e s i g n of s p e c i f i c

The z q ~ d 1 a l s o s e r v e s as a compact d e s c r i p t i o n of t echno-ecmonic

r e l a t i o n s h i p s v i t h i n t h e n e c h a n i c a l e n g i n e e r i n g s e c t o r . Though sector-wid;e i n s c o p e ,

i t i s r a t h e r h i g h l y d i s a g g r e g a t e d , and i t s t e c h n i c a l c o e f f i c i e n t s a r e e n g i h e e r i n g

est imates.T' . te n o d e l is r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e "make-buy" c h o i c e between domest ic p r o d u c t i o n

and i n p o r t s ; however, i t s s t r u c t u r e cou ld e a s i l y b e ex tended t o 2nc lude chb ices among

a l t e r n a t i v e p r o d u c t i o n t e c h n i q u e s f o r i n d i v i d u a l p r o d u c t s . The node1 is s t a t i c and

does no t i n c o r p o r a t e l o c a t i o n a l d e t a i l s . Economies of s c a l e a r e s p e c i f i e d l t h r o u g h t h e

zodel ls f o r n u l a t i o n as a n i x e d i n t e g e r programming (XIP) problem. The o b j e i t i v e f u n c r i o n

i s t o n i n i n i z e t h e c o s t of s a t i s f y i n g a f i x e d b i l l of exogenous demands fo* v a r i o u s

mechan ica l e n g i n e e r i n g p r o d u c t s . The s u p p l y ( p r o d u c t i o n p l u s i n p o r t s ) of each p r o d u c t

must s u f f i c e t o meet t h e exogenous demand p l u s t h e i n t e r m e d i a t e demand t h a e i s due t o

p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t y w i t h i n t h e s e c t o r . Inpu t- ou tpu t i n t e r d e p e n d e n c i e s wi th , in t h e

s e c t o r aAde t h u s c a p t u r e d w i t h i n t h e n o d e l .

The f o c a l conce rn of t h e model is t h e i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e among p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v , t i e s

w i t h i n t h e s e c t o r ; t h i s i s i t s advan tage over t r a d i t i o n a l methods o f p r o j e c t e v a l u a t i o n .

S i g n i f i c a n t i n t e r d e p e n d e n c i e s among p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s stem from s t r p n g Fconoxies of . f

h

s c a l e i n p r o c e s s i n g a c t i v i t y and a r e t r a n s m i t t e d th rough t h e u s e of ccmnon b a r t s

(components and sub- assembl ies1 i n a l a r g e number of d i f f e r e n t end p r o d u c t s ' a n d t h e u s e i

.a of c o m o n p r o c e s s i n g f a c i l i t i e s by d i f f e r e n t p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s . Capac i ty s h a r i n g , - - o u r t e r n f o r t h e u s e of c o n r n o n ~ r o c e s s i n g f a c i l i t i e s , is an e x t r e c e l y impor tan t ?her.o:ner.cr, -

0

t h a c r c s u l t : ~ t ' ron tile inul t i -purpose r ~ n t r l r c o f procc:;sing f a c i l i t i e s w i t h i n $he s e c t o r .

clcpscLt. ; r , . : ~ r i n g can o c c u r d i r e c t l y , a s w h e n t w o o r :;:ore p r o d u c t s a r e produced i:: t;:e

s a c e p l a n t , o r i n d i r e c t l y , a s xhzn d i s s i n l l a r p a r t s used ix d i f f e r e n t end products a r e

I * - he e:. c e r s , from t h e Korean I n s t i t u t e of S c i e n c e and Technology, worked ilnder t h e - d i r e c t i o n of Jcon Xoo :;an. T h e i r l ~ o r k v a s f inanced by the I 3 R D :lid t h e i ' t l ited S t a t e s Agency f o r I n t e r n a t i o n a l Cevelopment '? Xission t o Korea.

I .

Page 4: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

d ive r s i t : : ;-ocg 3 i l 0 7 ~ w i t h i n s ~ i ~ ~ e n s?,c? c l a s s t h a n zczcg 2 l a n t s - 2 i t h l n t t e sect::,

- d i s a g g r e ~ ~ r i o r , t o c!-,is Ls- el s i - p l i f i s s ~ 5 e n o a e l ' s s t r T ~ c t h : r e 2s t is rhs

e s c i a a c i o n o f t e c h n i c a l c c e f f i c i c n t s .

S t r u c t u r e sf t h e 'lode1

- 7

~ l l e 2ode. l i s a t a r g e t y e a z z o d e l c o n t a i n i n g f o u r d i s t i n c t s e t s of a c c i v i r i e s .

T h e r e is a s i x g l e 2 r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t y (xi) and a s i n g l e i n p o r t a c t i v i t y ( y . ) f o r each 1

p r o 2 u c t , i n d e x e d by i. b p r c d u c t nay be e i t h e r a n end p r o d u c t , s u b - a s s e f u ~ l y , c r I

conpcnen:. F o r e a c h shcp c l a s s ?, t h e r e i s a c o n t i n u o u s a c t i v i t y ( c k ) w h i c h c c r r e s p o n i s

t o t h e t o t a i v o l u n e of precessing w i t h i n s h o p s of z h z t c l a s s and a n i n n e g e r v a l u e d

a c t i - ~ i t y ( :,-) which c o r r s s p o n d s t o t h e number of s h o p s o f t h a t c l a s s <e iEg o ~ e r a z e d . h

The c o s t f u n c t i o n a s s o c i a t e d x i t i e a c h shop i s a f i x e d c h a r g e c o s t functi,n. ?,ere i s

aa u ? p e r bound t o t h e s i z e of a s i n g l e shop w i t h i n e a c h c l a s s , t h u s n o ? e t h a n a s i n g l e

s l o p n a y b e o p e r a t e d w i t h i n a g i v e n shop c l a s s .

T h r e e d i s t i n c t s e t s of c o n s t r a i n t s appear i n t h e n o d e l .

! ! a t e r i a l E a l a n c e C o n s t r a i n t s : There is a n a t e r i a i b ~ l a n c e c o n s t r $ i r , t f o r sash

producc stating t h a t r1;c s u n o f p r o d u c t i u n p l u s i m p o r t s ~ u s t e q u a i t h e ;urn of i , e I

Gxopenous dezitina p l u i :he e n c o g e n o u s l : ~ g e n e r a t e d deaand f o r i t s u s e a s hn ~ n t e c . c d 1 z t c

Page 5: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

Di = exugenods demand f o r t h e i ' t h p r o d u c t , i n m e t r i c t o p s ; and,

I = t h e nunber of p r o d u c t s ( p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s ) appearir 'g i n t5e mode:.

P;ocessing Requirement C o n s t m i n t s : For each shop c l a s s , a c o n s t r a i n t r e q u i r e s

t h a t t h e t o t a l vo1.une of p r o c e s s i n g be e q u a l t o t h e p r o c e s s i n g requir ,einents g e n e r a t e d 1

by t h e p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s :

I

k = 1, ..., K ; where

ck = t h e volume of p r o c e s s i n g i n shops of c l a s s k , i n shop hougs;

B k i = t h e number of shop h o u r s of p r o c e s s i n g r e q u i r e d i n a shop $f c l a s s k p e r

I

metric t o n of p r o d u c t i o n of t h e i ' t h p r o d u c t ; and, I

K = t h e number of shop c l a s s e s a p p e a r i n g i n t h e model.

I n t e g e r i t y C o n s t r a i n t s : F i n a l l y , a n o t h e r se t of c o n s t r a i n t s r e q u i t e s t h a t a

s u f f i c i e n t nunber of s h c p s be o p e r a t e d v i t h i n e a c h shop c l a s s : I

A k = Uk(ck) , k - 1, ..., K; where

bk = t h e number of s h o p s of c l a s s k b e i n g o p e r a t e d ;

Uk(ck) = f u n c t i o n g i v i n g t h e s m a l l e s t i n t e g e r l a r g e r t h a n o r e q u a l ck/Ck, and ,

Ck = t h e maximum p r o c e s s i n g c a p a c i t y of a shop i n c l a s s k , i n shbp h o u r s .

a e c t i v e Func t ion : A s s o c i a t e d w i t h each a c t i v i t y is a c o e f f i c i e n t i n t h e a

I

o b j e c t i v e f u n c t i o n s t a t i n g t h e exogenously g i v e n c o s t of o p e r a t i n g t h a t a c t i v i t y . The I

I

o b j e c t k v e f u n c t i o n i s : - -

minimize F. &:, + V c + F G i xi + L !.Ii Yi, whhre K k k a k= 1 12 i= 1 i= 1 -

I

Fk = t h e f i x e d cha rge a s s o c i a t e d wi th o p e r a t i n g a shop of c l a s s k ;

Vk = t h e v a r i a b l e c h a r g e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h o p e r a t i n g a shop of c i a s s k;

G~ = t h e exogenous c o s t of p roduc ing a m e t r i c t o n of :he i ' t h p r q d u s t ; and

!J = :he zrorld market i x p o r t p r i c e (donesc ic c u r r e n c y equ iva ien t l ) ? e r r?ecri.- i

I

torr of p roduc t i.

Page 6: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

c 0 n s : r a i n t s . The ~ c s t s of p r o c e s s l z g i n shc?s a rc a l s o enc!cge-ccsl;; dst2r: ine)i znc

- - 3re c h a r g e d t h r o u g h :he p r o c e s s i n g req1~i rer .e r . t c c n s t r a i n t s . T:?ese c c s h s i n c l ~ d e s - , I

z a p i t 3 1 c o s t s a s -dell a s i n d i r e c t i a b o r and x a t e r i a l s c o s t s i n c v ~ r k e a d czits ( 2 . g . I I

r e p a i r a n d z ~ i n t e n a n c e f a c i l i t i e s , s t e a c g e n e r a t i n g f a c i l i t i e s , and t?e like). Ca; l t z l I

c o s t s a r e b a s e d on :he i nves t zaen t c o s t o f c o n s t r u c t i n g a s h o p and incl lude i n t e r e s t I

as w e l l a s a r e p l a c e ~ e n t c h a r g e c a l c u l a ~ e d u s i n g a c a ? i t a l r e c o v e r y f a l c t a r . Jt3e.r I

i n t e r x e d i a t e i n p u t s , f o r wh ich t h e r e a r e no ?reduction a c t i v i t i e s ix :lie :.ode:, a r e

I i 2 c l u d e d \*<th in t h e exogenous c o s t e l e m e n t G i - ~ i r e c t l a b o r c o s t s a r e a l s o i n c o r F o r a t e d

I i n t h e G i l s a s t h e r e o r e a s s u ~ e d t o b ~ s o n s t z n t r e t c r n s t o t h e u s e o t / a ~ O r a i r e c i l y .-

er .p?ogea i n p r o c e s s i n g . I

I m p l e n e n t a t i o n o f t h e Yodel I I , I I

S e v e r a l i s s u e s must b e c o n f ~ o n t e d i n i m p l e x e n t i n g t h e mode l . ~ i r s k , wh ich

r e c h a n i c a l engf n e e r i n g p r o d u c t s are t o have p r o d u c t i o n a s t i v i t i e ; i n the n o d e l , i . e .

a r e t o be endogenous? A s b r o a d 2 c o v e r a g e a s p o s s i b l e was d e s i r e d i n i h e Korean I

i m p l e m e n t a t i o n , f o r t h e n o d e l was conceive.! a s a neons t o i s o l a t e t ! losj p r o d u c t s i n .'.hizn - I

I

Korea would have t h e g r e a t e s t c o n p a r a t i - r e a d v a n t a q e by 1975, t h e t a r g e f y e a r . T h e r e I 1 .

.vas n o n e t h e l e s s e p r t - s z l e c ~ i o n of p r o d u c t s , f o r i t was d e s i r e d t o c c r . a s ~ t r o : e cr.

I

t h o s e f o r c h i c h t h e r e ..~cls the g r e a t e s t 1Lkelii1cod t h a t Korea cculc! ac':~Seve ?roduct io!: I

c o s t s c o m p e t i t i v e v i t h i m p o r t s . ~ h c i p r e - s e i c c t i o n was p e r f o n e c i . :i:; er:gjirjcers rind :;zs I I

based upon - ~ ~ a r i o u s r u l e s of ~ h u c b and 2 Xnowicdge o f t ' ~ s - t ' ; ~ e : ~ exist in^ c z ; ' ~ b i l l t i e c o i

. . w I

K o r e a ' s nec ! l an icn i e n g i - e e r i r . 3 ir.dus:r:;. .L'?]e iiit cf ~-..:&O~CZC~J.:~ i>ri..cjt:,j:s c c ; ~ : z i ; ~ s I I . . . 120 i te - :5 . T!le f i r a d ~ = : s a p p . : , r i n g cn :!)is :is: r a n g e frcri; s ~ < : i :i::':-:;;~ :1: 2.l;ZS Z??C

. . jolts nl:i, :;in?!t: f a n <;.plt:, ,:i;s ;.I.$ t o .nnai)i;.ic Len:.; ,.;.: '"1~~:j:~'Pi~fs. I:.: ';<is ~i5.5"Z.L:. . '

. - . 1 . . L , 3 c i.:.s c , ;>..c..! . <; :. :':;c :::L:<: t h a t o t l l r r K C : - i ~ a n i c a i e n g i n e e r i r . g prodcc - t s , n o t ,:;~yc:!rii;; C'i: ' - .

Page 7: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

d

C o n c l - p t n a l l y , e a c h of t h e i n d i v i d u a l " ? roduc t s " a p p e a r i n g i n t h e c o d e l r e p r e s e c t s

a whole c l a z s of p r o e ~ c t s . F o r e x a n ? l e , t h e p r o d u c t " f r a c t i o n a l horsepower e l 2 c t r i c

c o t o r " r e p r e s e n t s t h e c l a s s of e l e c t r i c n o t o r s o i l e s s t h a n one horsepower . T h i s b e i c g

t h e c a s e , t h e r e i s a s e r i o u s i s s u e r e g a r d i n g how t h e t e c h n i c a l c o e f f i c i e n ~ s d e s c r i b i a g -

t h e p r o d x c t i o n of f r a c t i o n a l horsepower e l e c t r i c m o t o r s s h o u l d b e o b t a i n e d . I n one

v i e w , d e r i v e d f rom t h e p r i n c i p l e s of a g g r e g a t i o n i n i n p u t- o u t p u t a n a l y s i s , t h e s e

c o e f f i c i e n t s s h o u l d be w e i g h t e d a v e r a g e s of t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s p e r t a i n i n g to , i n d i v i d u a l l y

s p e c i f i e d f r a c t i o n a l ho r sepower e l e c t r i c n o t o r s , t h e w e i g h t s b e i n g e q u a l t o ( a n t i c i p a t e d )

- - o u t p u t s h a r e s . I n a n o t h e r v i ew, most c l e a r l y a r r i c u l a t e d Ly V i e t o r i s z (UNF~0,/-1972/),

t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s s h o u l d p e r t a i n t o t h e s i n g l e , most " r e p r e s e n t a t i v e " of t h e i n d i v i d u a l i y

s p e c i f i e d f r a c t i o n a l ho r sepower e l e c t r i c n o t o r s . For a nunber of r e a s o n s , l i n c l u d i n g

t h e e n g i n e e r i n g t r a d i t i o n of employing t h e " r e p r e s e n t a t i v e p r o d u c t" c o n c e p t , t h e

e n g i n e e r s working on t h e m o d e l ' s i a p l e n e n t a t i o n p r e f e r r e d t o have a s i n g l e u n i q u e l y

s p e c i f i e d p r o d u c t s e r v e a s t h e " r e p r e s e n t a t i v e" o f e a c h p r o d u c t c l a s s .

For t h e n o s t p a r t , w e c h o s e as r e p r e s e n t a t i v e t h o s e p r o d u c t s t h a t would have ':he

I

l a r g e s t s h a r e s e i t h e r of t h e a n t i c i p a t e d a b s o l u t e o u t p u t o r t h e a n t i c i p a t e d , growth of

c s t p u t v i t h i n t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e p r o d u c t c l a s s e s . The b o u n d a r i e s demarca t ing ! i n d i v i d u a l

p r o d u c t c l a s s e s were drawn on t h e b a s i s of s i m i l a r i t i e s among i n d i v i d u a l p r o d u c t s w i r h

r e s p e c t t o i n t e m e d i a t e i n p u t and p r o c e s s i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s . Thus t h e r e p r e s k n t $ I t i v e . I

p r o d u c t s a r e i n t e n d e d t o b e " r e p r e s e n t a t i v e " of t h e i n t e m e d i a t e i n p u t and p r o c e s s i n g

r e q u i r e m e n t s of a l l t h e i n d i v i d u a l p r o d u c t s f a l l i n g w i t n i n each p r o d u c t c l n g s . The - - d e g r e e t o which tI$zy a r e t r u l y r e p r e s e n t a t i v e i s of c o u r s e dependen t upon Ildw na r rowly

t h e b o l ~ n d a r i c s begdcen p r o d u c t c l a s s e s a r e drawn. 8 e . I

One l o o s e end remains t o b e t i d i e d up, and t h a t i s i n r e g a r d t o t h e ccnversion

of indi:ridual, n o n- r e p r e s e n t a t i v e p r o d u c t s i n c l u d e d w i t h i n a p a r t i c u l a r prcduc: ciass

FnEo u n i t s of t h e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e p r o d u c t . T h i s c o n v e r s i o n i s r e q u i r e d i n o r d e r to c:;iz

tb.e d c ~ a n d f o r t h e p r o d u c t c l a s s i n u n i t s of r h e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e ~ r o d u c : . The 2 c c z n d

Page 8: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

I , -

su;ply and denand i s p'n;isical xe ighc ( i 2 : 3 e r r t c c a n s ) . 3; I s q~rr.p-:.- the ? s f az?c - I I - - - -

v o l u n e :n ~ s t r i c t o n s of t h e exogencus ?urc:?ases o r a,: of c:?e i n d i v i $ u a ; z ~ ' Z ; i : t s I

f a l l i n g y i i t h i n t h e p a r t i c u l a r ? r o d u c t c i a s s . I

The s e c c n d n a j o r i s s u e 2190 c o n c e z p s a n a g g r e g a t i o n p r o ' c l m , t h i S Z ize ;llt'n I

r e c p s c r t o t t i e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of shop c l a s s e s . i n o u r i z p ? e ~ . e n t a t i c n i two r,r::ents I

d e s c r i b e a snop c l a s s : (1) t h e t y p e o f p r o c e s s i c e a c r i v i c y ; and , ( 7 ) +he c o l l e c t i z n I I

of p r o d u c t s c h a t c a n be p r o c e s s e d together t r i t h i n a s i s g l e shop . To '$orrow z n a n a l c g y I

P r o r b i o l o s y , t h e f o r n e r i d e n t i f i e s t h e g e n u s and t h e l a t t e r :he s p e c i e s . !.!e r a v e

distinguished anong 37 shop t:J?es, o r g e n e r a , a c c o r d i n g t o t h e k i n d 08 p r c c e s s L n ~ I

a c ; l v i r y c o n d u c t s d ( f o r g i n g , c a s t i n g , x a c n i n i n g , f a b r i c a t i o n , e t c . ) , <he ~ a j o r

p i e c e s cf equ ipmen t i n c l u d e d v i t h i n t h e s h o p , t h e maxinun w e i g h t of thle p a r t s -.:LC

can b e worked , t h e rnaxinunz f o r c e d e v e l o p e d by p r i x e equipment i n - t h e sihop, and s o c n . I

A l l s h o p s b e i o n g i n g t o t h e s a x e genus a r e assurried t o nave i d 2 n t i c a l fii:<ed c h a r g e I

c o s t f u n c t i o n s , which s o n s i d e r a b L y reduce ; t h e s z o u n t o f p a r a m e t e r e s t i h a t i o n

I . . r e q ~ i r c d t o 1rr.plemenr t h e model . W i t h i n a p a r t i c u l a r qeni l s , t h e r e e d i s : i n rc>.:;:-J l

a ~ i d e ; ~ z r i e t y of p a r t i c u l a r i z e d s h o p s , t h e d c s i g x o i each d e p e n d i c g ubcn :he L

. t I

I . . p a r t i c u i a r p r o d u c t x i - : b e i n g p roduced . !;e g i v e s x a r e s s j oi; t o thiy f a 2 k >y ais:ir?;;u:s!iing

I I

among s p e c i e s on t h e basis of the p r o d \ i z t s t h a t c c n b e ?roccs.cec! 1:eget;ler ~ L i ! ? i r , a - 3 I

s i n g l e s h o p . T h e d e s i g n a z i o n cf i n d i v i d d a l shop c : a s s - ~ v i t i i i n n g e n c k ;~:;:-es a * * I

r e a s c n a b i e l i z i t o n t h e e:<cer.r tc .~ilic:h #e i20de l car: ~ : . . p i o i .:2pL:ci:y i s ! ~ r % r z ct: m I . .

? - - . l o ~ . e r at:crage prudi!:: t i o n cos;; . In a l l , the >(oren 3 ~ 2 2 2 .I<. s i - i n ~ i i.r,ilcs L - c . 2 ~ .t..:> ::::I I -

- '. - , ,.: ,< . - . - - . . . .lc ne:<': ;?;;jar j 5.535 : ~ T . c ~ T : : s : : ! .e i r e a : - z c r ? l . - . - . ~ -.,. ,. : :!,,I: :?,; .L:--- c,. :. I:;:, :.:-.L

Page 9: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- 8 -

t h e f o l l o w i n g : I n r i i v i d u a l p i e c e s of e q u i p n e n t w i t h i n a shop a r e i n d i v i s i b l e . The re - is a l s o e v i d e n c e t h a t a s lx i l a r p i e c e of equipment of g r e a t e r c a p a c i t y c o s t s l e s s

p e r u n i t of c a p a c f t y t h a n d o e s one w i t h l ess c a p a c i t y . F i n a l l y , t h e r e a r e economies

of s c a l e w i t h r e s p e c t t o l o t s i z e because o f t h e f i x e d tine r e q u i r e d t o s e t - u p a

machine f o r a p a r t i c u l a r p r o d u c t i o n s e e p . Our i m p l e m e n t a t i o n i s focusLd on t h e I

i n d i v i s i b i l i t y of p r o c e s s i n g f a c i l i t i e s and a n economies o f s c a l e i n t h e i r c a 7 i t a l

c o s t s ; t h e s e would a p p e a r t o b e t h e i f i o ~ t s i g n i f i c a n t s o u r c e s o f d e c r e a b i n g a v e r a g e I

c o s t s i n t h e p r e s e n t Korean c o n t e x t . The p r o c e s s i n g i n p u t r e q u i r e m e n t c o e f f i c i + n t s

a p p e a r i n g i n t h e mod21 i n c l u d e t h e a v e r a g e ( w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e a n t i c i b a t e d s c a l e I

o f uu ;pu t ) t ine s p e n t on s e t t i n g- u p t h e equ ipmen t . I I I I

To e s t i m z t e t h e p r o c e s s i n g i n p u t r e q u i r e m e n t s and c o s t s , a " r e f e r i n c e shop" I

was d e s i g n e d f o r e a c h genus o f s h o p . c l a s s e s . E n a i n e e r i n g e s t i m a t e s o f t h e p r o c e s s i n g I I

i n p u t c o e f f i c i e n t s , Bki, were o b t a i n e d i n r e l a t i o n t o t h e s e r e f e r e n c e qhops. Shop 1 I

p r g c e s s i n g a c t i v i t y and c a p a c i t y v e r e i n i t i a l l y measured i n a a c h i n e ho(rs w i t h

r e s ? e c t t o t h e r e f e r e n c e s h o p . Thus t h e B c o e f f i c i e n t s i n i t i a l l y s t i t e d t h e t o t a l I

k i I I I

t i m e , summed o v e r t h e machines used w i t h i n t h e r e f e r e n c e s h o p , r e q u i r e d \ i n a c t u a i I

p r o c e s s i n g . &/ The machine t i n e c a p a c i t y of a p a r t i c u l a r shop e q u a l s t e numker of b mach ines i t c o n t a i n s m u l t i p l i e d by t h e number of h o u r s w i t h i n a y e a r t h b t t h e shop

I

may b e o p e r a t e d . I n t h e c a s e of shop g e n e r a i n which t h e c a p a c i t y of c i r c a i n p r i n e I

machines c o n r r o l s t h e p r o c e s s i n g f low, pr ime machine h o u r s s u b s t i t u t e f)r t o t a l I e

C I I

machine h o u r s as t h e measure of b o t h p r o c e s s i n g a c t i v i t y and c 9 p a c i t y . f o r c o n v e n i e n c e , I I

b o t h i n computa t ion and r e p o r t i n g s o l u t i o n r e s u l t s , machine t i r e was =or /ver ted t o

"shop t i n e " a f t e r t h e e s t i m a t e s were o b t a i n e d . T h i s c o n v e r s i o n s i m p 3 e q u i r e s C 1 - C I

d i v i d i n g p a r a m e t e r . measured i n a a c h i n e t i n e u n i t s by t h e number of - cq ines ( o r =a - I I I

p r i n e a a c h i n e s ) c o n t a i n e d i n t h e r e f e r e n c e shop . I I I

6 / Nr,'ce t h a t t h i s is n o t t h e s a c : h i n g 3 s t h e t o t s 1 " r c o l " t i n e a pa r t l i c i l l a r i:rx - spends w i t h i n a s h o p , which .*.culd i n c l u d e t h e "...iaitingU tLze d u r i n g ' : < h i ~ i ~ i t 1s b e i n g s t o r e d o r h e l d f o r f u r t h e r precessing. I

I I I I

I

I I I , !

Page 10: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

of ? i e c e s p r c d u c e d , t h e o ~ h e r i zpc r : an r 2e:eni:;zn:s ?i tkle t o c a l 2 r c k z s z i n - 6

I

r e c u i r e l e r . E s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h a p a r c i c - l a r i:en inc:ude the g e c g e t r i c coc f igu ra r i c . : l

o f t h e p i e c e t o be worked , t h e bi-,e;..siori and ; leigi l t of t h e ? i e c e t o be worked, ~ k s I

l e g r e e of ? r e c i s i o n r e q u i r e d , t h e l e n g t h cf t h e p r o d u c t i o n r u n , and t$e h a r d n e s s of I I - ,:,e - p i e c e t o b e v o r k e d . L/ However, n e a s u r e ~ e n t i n u n i t s o f t i m e i s Brckward wkeil i t I

cotes t o r r a s u r i n g c a p a c i t y , s i z c e any s h c p h a s t h e same c a p a c i t y i n isms of t h e I

t i z e i t nay be o p e r a t e d , r s g a r i i e s s of i c s s i r e i n t2L-35 of t h e n a a i r 4 n p o s s i b l e I I ~

v o l u ~ e of p r o d u c t i o n d u r i n g t h a t t i c e p e r i o d . I I

I

To o b c a i n e s t i n a t e s of t h e c o s t s of c o n s t r u c t i n g and o p e r a t i n g s q o p s of I I

d i f f e r e n t p h y s i c a l o u t ~ u t c a p a c i t i e s and f a l l i n g w i t h i n t h e s a o e % e c u g , t h e f o l l o u i n g I ~ I

p r o c e d u r e was employed. F i r s t , e s t i a a t s s o f t h e c o s t s of c o n s t r u c t i c $ and operating I l

e a c h r e f e r e n c e shop were o b t a i n e d . Then a shop w i t h i n each genus was d e s i g n e d t h a t - . I

had c ; i c e t h e 2 h y s i c a l o u t p u t c a p a c i t y cf t h e r e f e r e n c e s h o p , ; . hys i ca i o u t p u t c a p a c i t y I

b e i n s measu red i n soEe way t h a t was m e a n i n g f u l t o t h e e n g i n e e r s . :<e niay r e f e r to I

I

t h e s e s l ~ o p s a s t h e " d o u b l e - r e f e r e n c e - c z p a c i t y " s h o p s . C iven t h e e c c n o n ~ i e s of s c a l e I I

p r e v a l e n t i n t h e s e c t o r , t h e s e s h o p s do n o t mere ly r e p r e s e n t p r o ? o r t i o b a i b l o w - u ~ s

* o f t h e r e f e r e n c e ' s 2 o p s . Thus , i n d i v i d u a l p i e c e s of z a c h i n e r y f o u z d i n a g i v e n I

r e f e r e n c e shop n i g h t nc: e v e n be p r c s e n t ir, t h e a s s ~ 7 c i a t e d doub l c - r e f e ence-ca;>; lci : y k sllop. R e g a r d l e s s c f i t s ~ i t u a l x a c h i n e t ize capacit::, t i e s! lup tiae ;Gpa:i;y cf . i i ; i l

I

i - doubie- re lerence- l :ap:~ci ty sho; i s p r e c i s e l y twice I::s a s s c c i a c e d rc ferkr !cc shop's

8 I I

cap:acit:r. : ; ieasured iri shop tirne. Si:cp t i y e I S t ! :e refore a c : a " r e s l " t!::.~. : o ? i c p t I . . I

1 . a s e:n;;oyei in t ;?e ~ c ~ i e l ; i t is 1 r e l a t L - : ~ ,once?: -- <,:on c t r . 2 !:as se:r::..;z - o;,l-: -1:

rc1.q ?:i(~;l tc. tj:e ~ i : ~ p ~i:::f ,:3-; . i . . i a [ t::e c . . - ; s o ~ i a ; ~ . . .-;r: ;.reg:? si:::;!. .:,: : refer2r . : t .

- .. -.. .. , . ,,,,- ;:2?n:-:~: o f 2 , . : . ; , ; _ : LC!.?;; i;.:):rs :;; s;.zgAL ,-:!::: ::,. t ,> ;-ere ;?;cczed t o ';:;i..;e 3:i n - - , - I

o;.er:e:zI::. - - . ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ . f - r i j s:l:F ? f 1 , ,)(?;- 2..>4,2 ;lL,.,.: :::;,~:: Y . ~ : is ci 5fl:j;3 ; : ; : y ; : : . , :

I

- - . - - --. .- - - - I

I 7 , .- ( . -, v . . P .; i T.., , . , - . . . I .- .'c.. . . c . L , . . . -, a n d !<GI:.~ , . - . ; . ! I .

I I

Page 11: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

one h a l f the p h y s i c a l o u t p u t c a p a c i t y of t h e r e f e r e n c e shop ; a shop hav ing 5,OCO -

she? !,curs c a p a c i t y h a s t x o znd one h a l f t i x e s t h e p h y s i c s 1 outpu; c a p a c l t y of t h e ,

r e f e r e n c e shop.

E s t i u a t e s of t h e c o s t s of c o n s t r u c t i n g and o p e r a t i n g e a c h of t h e doub le- re fe rence- ,

capacity s h o p s were a l s o o b t a i n e d . C a p i t a l c o s t s were a n n u a l i z e d a{d a f i x e d cha rge

c a p a c i t v c o s t f u n c t i o n f o r e a c h genus was e s t i m a t e d by f i t t i n g a s t n a i g h r l i n e t o I

t h e p o i n t a n n u a l c o s t e s t i m a t e s f o r the r e f e r e n c e and double-referen)ce-shcps. F i n a l l y , I

t h e r e i s a n llpper l i m i t t o t h e p e r n i s s i b l e shop ttme c a p a c i t y of a s j n g l e shop w i t h i n

a g i v e n shop c l a s s . T h i s l i m i t r e f l e c t s two f a c t o r s : o u r i n t e r p o l a t e d f j s e d cha rge

c o s t f u n c t i o n f o r p r o c e s s i n g i n p u t s i s r e a s o n a b l y v a l i d o v e r o n l y a p a r t i c u l a r range;

and, t h e r e a r e sometimes p h y s i c a l l i m i t s t o t h e c a p a c i t y of a s i n g l e shop. I I

A 1 1 s h o p s a r e assumed t o o p e r a t e a t f u l l c a p a c i t y . T h a t i s , t h g volume of I

p r o c e s s i n g by a chop i s t h e s a n e a s i t s c a p a c i t y . 3/ Thus, shops had ing a vo lunc

I

of p r o c e s s i n g l e s s than 2 ,000 shop hours do n o t have e x c e s s c a p a c i t y l a s c a p a c i t y I I

measured i n shop t i n e i s a r e l a t i v e r a t h e r t h a n an a b s o l u t e c o n c e p t . Converse ly , a

volume o f p r o c e s s i n g i n e x c e s s of 2,000 h o u r s i s no t t o b e i n t e r p r e t e d i n t e r n s of

0 3 e r a t i o n i n e x c e s s of " d e s i r e d" o u t p u t o, m u l t i p l e s h i f t o p e r a t i o n . : F i n a l l y , i t

shou ld a l s o be c l e a r t h a t t h e d i f f e r e n c e between a p a r t i c u l a r s h 3 p 1 s ! c a p a c i t y and the I

maximum c a p a c i t y f o r a shop i n i t s r e s p e c t i v e c l a s s dogs n o t r e p r e s e n k e x c e s s c a p a c i t y . I

IIowever, i t does r,ef;ect t h e d e g r e e t o which p o t e n t i a l economies of s k a l c have n o t L - I

been e x p l o i t e d , s i n c e econocnes cf s c a l e f o r a p a r t i c u l a r shop a r e e i b a u s r e d a t a

c a p a c k t y e q u a l t o , where t h e a v e r a g e c o s t of an hour of p r o c e s s i n g ! i s a t i t s Lo.*-er

'9 I

bound. - - a / T h i s is t h e a p p r o p r i a t e a s s u n p t i o n i n a s t a t i c node l focused cn d o t e m i n i n g -

c o m ~ a r a t i v e advan tage i n Lhe z e d i u n t e r n . Bowevcr, i n a dy1:anic a n a l v s i s , t!x p o s s i b l i t y of ex:ess c a p a c i t y x u s t be a d a i t t e d . See C h e n e r ~ (1952) and Hanne ( 1067 ) .

Page 12: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

-, t a k e s :p :h is t a s k . r ; r s t , a cunber 3f r e ; * ~ i r e l conce? rc m u s t b e C e v - z l 2 p e d .

E s c i z a t e s of c o s ~ f o r individual ? r o d u c t i s n activities can onL;~ b e o b t s i z e c

if i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e t h r o u g h c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g i s r . eg lec t=d . Thus, i n what f3115;~5,

w e te rnporar i l j r n e g l e c t c a 7 a c i t y s h a r i n g . The a v e r a g e p r o c e s s i n g c o s t of a .:ieLris

t o n of p r o d u c t i i s g i v e n by:

Average P r o c e s s i n g COSC = : - 17 vk (Bki x i17 /K, + 1 irk Bki . " 'n

The x a r g l n a l c o s t of p r o c e s s i n g a n e t r i c t o n of p r o d u c t i i s s i x p l y Z V 3 . The k k k i

p o i n t s c a l e a l a s t i ~ i t y of r h e p r o c e s s i n g c o s t of p roduc ing a E e t r i c t o n ai p r c d u c t I

i s t h e x a r g i n a l c o s t d i v i d e d by t h e a v e r a g e c o s t : ,- -

E v 5, k t t i

?recessing Cos t P o i n t S c a l e E l a s t i c i t y = k - TiFk - Ck (aki xi)-? /xi +- L vk 3, ti i k li

The p o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y is n o t d e f i n e d f o r v a l u e s of x i t h a t a r e i n f i n i t e s i ~ a l l y less

I t h a n i n t e g e r i ; i u l t i p l e s of Ck/aki, f o r k such t h a t Ski > 0 , f o r t h e s e a r e t h e s c a l e s of

o u t p u t a t whish a a a r g i n a l e x p a n s i o n of o u t p u t r e q u i r e s t h a t a n a d d i t i c n a i f i x e d cha rge

be i n c u r r e d . Were one t o ?lo& t h e p o i n t s c a l e a l a s t l c i t : ~ a s a f u n c t i o n of E U C F C Z , i t

~ - o l ~ l d be found t o h a - ~ e a d t s c o n t i n u o u s downward "juzipl ' s: eocil I n t e g e r m u l t i ~ l e ~f

* c ~ / B ~ ~ , f o r k such chat H k i 0; between t h e s e p o i n t s , t h e e1aS i : i t . y i s a con:iz:~cus,

' 9 .G

i n c r e a s i n z i u n c t i c n of output. - - - I r is p o F s i b i s :o d e c e m i n c a x z s ; ~ ~ ~ p t o t i ~ s s a i e el;scizit>T i ~ h i : ! ~ is the 17--er - i f

I boned ox t h e p o i n t scale c i r ? s ~ l c l t : : . Ccns!iirr tile a v r , i c t l ccc,t - f ;'roc : . s : i i . ~ 2: ,:

Page 13: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

h s y - r p t o t i c P r o c e s s i n g Cost = 7 (Fk/ck) %i + Vk alii X

Averagd c o s t i s minimized a t t h o s e o u t p c t l e v e l s where e v e r y shop employed i n producing

t h e p r o d u c t i s o p e r a t e d a t a c a p a c i t y e q u a l t o i t s naxinu.. p o s s i b l e c a p a c i t y , i . e . wherz I

e c o n o a i e s of s c a l e have been f u - l y e x p l o i t e d . Using t h e ninirnum;value of ave rage cost

t o d a t e r n i n e t h e p o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y y i e l d s the a s y u p t o t i c sc41e e l a s l i c i t y :

Precessing Cost Asymptotic Sca le kl . E l a s t i c i t y =

Depending upon t h e p a r t i c u l a r c o s t components i n c l u d e d i n thb f i x e d and v a r i a b l e I

I c o s t p a r a m e t e r s , t h e d e f i x i t i o n s above y i e l d the p o i n t and a s p p t b t i c s c a l e e l a s t i - i t i e s

I

of c a p l t a l c o s t and v a l u e added. The d e f i n i t i o n of t h e s c a l e e l a p t i c i t y of t o t a l

2 I

p r o d u c t i o n c o s t depends npon t h ~ way i n w h i c i ~ endogenous i n t e r m e d i a t e i n p u t c o s t s a r e I

measured. Endogenous i n t e r n e d i a t e i n p u t s g i v e r i se t o i n d i r e c t e ionomies o f s c a l e , I

w5ereas o u r d e f i n i t i o n s of t h e c a p i t a l c o s t and v a l u e added s c a 1 e ) e l a s t i c i t i e s ~ e r t a i n I

Before t a k i n g up t h i s i s s u e , hoyever , we f r s t g i v e t h e g e n e r a l h_ - I

e x p r e s s i o n s f o r t h e n z r g i n a l and average ( t o t a l ) c o s t s of p roduc i Jg a m e t r i c t o n of I

2 r o d u c t i , as w e l l a s t h o s e f o r t h e p o i n t and a s y m p t o t i c s c a l e e l d s t i c i t i e s . The f o m e r

f o l l o w from t h e s t a t e m e n t of tt.e model: I I I

>!arginzl P r o d u c t i o n Cost a MCi =

- I

Avera'ge' P r o d u c t i o n Cost = ACi =' i ok uk(Bki xi)-7/xi + v Bki + Gi + 5 ' ' k C I

j j i jj 1

u h e r e p j and p ' a r e (shadow) p r i c e s of t h e j ' t i , p r o d u c t p e r me t r ik t o n . The f i r s t t e r n - j I i

i n t h e e x p r e s s i o n f o r m a r g i n a l c o s t g i v e s the marg ina l c o s t of d i r b c t p r o c e s s i n g i n s t l o p s I - - t h e second , the d i r e c t n a r g i n a l exogencus c o s t ; and, t h c t h i r d , thk n a r g i n a l c o s t o f * I 8

1 C

I I - endogenous i n t e r n e d i a t e :nputs, i f t he p measure m a r g i n a l supp ly c o s t s . I n t h e e x p r e s s 5

j I f o r a v e r a g e c o s t , t h e f i r s t t e r n g i v e s t h e average f i x e d c o s t of d i r e c t p r o c e s s i n g

I

i n s h o p s ; the second and t h i r d t e r n s r e s p e c t i v e l y cor respond t o the fLrs: and second I I

terms i n t h e e x p r e s s i o n f o r n a r g i n a l c o s t ; a n d , t h e f o u r t h term g i v e s t h e a-:erage zest I I

of e n d a g e n o ~ ~ s i n t e m e d i z t e i n p u t s , if the measure a v e r a g e s u p p l y i o s c s . ~ I v e r s g e I I

Page 14: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

: ~ s t , e z d c g s n o u s i , - , t emed ia t= L r , ? ~ t s a r e ;13111er! lt t h e i r j v e r a z a s u p ~ l l : c c s i r2r,i:i-r

t 3 a n : h s i r ~ a r g i x a l s u p p l y i s s t . I I

. . The ~ o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i : ? of t o c a l i O 5 ~ i s 3 b t a i ~ e d 5y ? i d i d i n 2 zarz:nz-

I

I

c o s t 57 a v e r a g e c o s t : I I I I

P r o d u c t i o n C o s t ? o i n t S c a l e E l a s t i c i t y = TICi/dC I

i ' I I I I

An a s p p t o t i c s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y f o r t o t a l c o s t nay a l s o be d e f i n e ~ d . S i n c e che oct:cr

I c m p o n e n t s of t o t a l p r o d u c t i o n c o s t e x h i b i t cons ta r : : r e t u r n s t o p c a i e , t h e a v e r a g e

I

c o s t of p r o d u c t i o n i s x i n i n i z e d a t t h e l e v e l of o u t 2 u ~ f o r w h i c h p r o c e s s i n g c c s t is I I

n i n i ~ i z e d . The p r z c e d i n g d i s c u s s i o n of a s l m p t o t i c 7 r o c e s s i n g c o $ t is t h u s r e l e v a n t ,

and vie O D t a i n : I 1

I - A s ~ m ~ t o t i c P r o d u c t i o n Cos t = A = 7 /TF ?/ck) + VI,/ ~~i + Gi : A E - ?? ;

j j i J I I

d v c t i o n C o s t .Xs>m$to-~i.c S c a i e E l a s t i c i t y = > I C ~ / A C ; ; I I

where p? g i v e s t h e a s y n p t o t i c a v e r a g e s u p p l y c o s t of t h e j' t h p l o d u c t . J

I t r ema ins t o s p e c i f ; ? c o r e c o n c r e t e l y now t h e m a r g i n a l , a v e a g e , and a s y n p t o t i c I

c o s t s cf t h e endogenous i n t e m e d i a t e i n p u t s a r e t o be d e r e r n i n e d l C o n s i d e r t h e F o i l c w i r I

l i n e a r p r o g r a m i n g p rob lem, l e r i r e d From t h e o r i g i n a l : I IP model i n 3 manner d i s c u s s e e

~ f u r t h e r below:

1 e

min imize i Ti xi + 7 s u b j e c t t o

i

I xi z7.d y i , i = I* . . , I , g r e a t e r t?:an o r e q u a l t o z e r o ; rr( I m I

-, i s a p r o d u c t i o n c o s t pci ran ter ~ s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e i':n $rsduct:::: ' I C E i - j : y ; A I

I

-3.-C. La:ns co tb.e cake-b~:; c h o i c e l;r,der ~ o : l s c a n t rt!t~::.; :L' L;) . ;es t -~~ ~'I-LL!.:, : i c n i:, t . : ~

I

p r e s e n c e of i n t e r x e d d - i n p u t L n t : r r d e ~ c c , c e t c e . T t 1:u.:;

I I

I ~ I

Page 15: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

D i , i = 1, ..., I, g r e a t e r t h a n o r e q u a l t o z e r o ;

I I

- I I I

where 9 i s t h e d u a l v a r i a b l e t o t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g material b a l a n k e c o n s t r a i n t i n t h e 'i

1 p r i m a l . The two c o n s t r a i n t sets of t h e d u a l may 3e r e p l a c e d by a s n g l e c o n s t r a i n t : 1

I

Thus :he shadow p r i c e o f t h e i ' t h p r o d u c t , pi , i s e q u a l t o t h e r i n i n u n o f t h e impor t I I

p r i c e and t h e c o s t of dome,t ic p r o d u c t i o n . I , I I

The " s u b s t i t u t i o n theorem1' f a n i l i a r f r o n t h e i n p u t- o u t p u t and ( p r o c e s s a n a l y s i s I

l i t e r a t x r e h o l d s f o r t h e p r i n a l l i n e a r p r o g r a m i n g problem. - 9 / hit i s , t h e d v e c t o r I

may be r e p l a c e d by 2 non- nega t ive v e c t o r w i t h c u t a f f e c t i n g t h e c q o i c e b e t v e e n I

produc ing and i m p o r t i n g e a c h p r o d u c t o r t h e v a l u e s of t h e p r o d u c t dhadow p r i c e s . The

s o l u t i o n t o t h e d u a l n o d e l i s t h u s u n i q u e l y de te rmined by t h e va ludls o f t h e iii p a r a n e t e r s . I

T h r e e p a r t i c u l a r c a s e s of t h i s l i n e a r programming problem are r e l e v a n t , e a c h d i f f e r i n g I i n t h e p r e c i s e d e f i n i t i o n of t h e T~ p a r a m e t e r s . 1

- - - - 1 The p r i n a l Y a r q i n a l C ~ s t Hodel : L e t x = i - V k Bki +- Gi, i = 1, . . . , I .

i

l i n e a r program:-ng ndrdel t h e n c o r r e s p o n d s t o t h e HIP model when t h f i x e d c h a r g e s and l-' t h e c o r r e s p o v d i n g i n t e g e r i t y c o n s t r a i n t s a r e t o t a l l y n e g l e c t e d . ~ h k d u a l v a r i a b l e s , c

I i -

g i v e t h e n a r g i n a l c o s t of s u p p l y , pi , f o r each prod$t . I

! L I

I

The p r i n a l l i n e a r progra;;air.g -!ode1 t h e n c o r r e s p o n d s t o t h e :II? c,odc$l ?hen ~!:e i n t e g e r i t : ;

9 / See the c h a p t e r s by Sa;r,celson, Koop.;ins, Arrow, and Ge~rgcsc i ; -RoQgen (respecti- ,el : ' - c h a p t e r s 7 tflrougn 10) i n Xoopnans (1351) . I

I

Page 16: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

. , ,.*. . . s,,.*.e , ,?I,,+, v > ?. ,?, , -1,. .. - = c . i j e c c i - . ~ e f u n c t i o n . I;.? 22s: -:!rl~o:zs, - - - ? ,.-.a :,- - - 3 c L A SL:::-,.. - . .

L 1 f i > Z G L - tp;n ? r o d x t . I

I

I

A s v x ~ t o c i c C o s t :!ocel: I

I

I n this c a s e , t h e p r i a a l z o d e l c o r r e s ~ o n d s t~ t h e YI? -ode1 xhed t h e integeriE1.1 I

c c n s c r a i - t s a r e d ropped and t h e a v e r a g e f i r e d c o s t a t t h e maxindm p o s s i b l e capaci:y io- I l

each s h o p i s c h a r g e d i n r". cbjj+;Live func ; ion . The d u a l v a r i a q l e s , 2 zov g i - ~ s t i e 1 i '

asyz ipzot i : c o s t o f s u p p l y , p $ f o r e a c h p r o d u c r . i

1' I The n a r g i ~ a l and a s p p t o t i c c o s t s o f s u ? p l y a r e i ndependen of outpu: l e - ~ e i s .

gave-:er, t h e a v e r a g e c o s t o f s u p p l y f o r p r o d u c t i depends upon t h e a s s u r e d l e v e l s of I o u r p r : o f - a l l t h e p r o d u c t s , u n l e s s t h e X x a t r i x i s cec:ornposable.( Thus t h e ? r c d u c t i a n ~

I

c o s t ? o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y i s a l s o a f u n c t i o n o; t h e assumed ou~ tpuc l e v e i s af a l l I

t h e d i r e c t and i n d i r e c t endosenous i n t e r n e d i a t e i n p u t s . - 10 /

E s t i z a t e s of S c a l e E l a s t i s i t i e s

F i g u r e 1 g i v e s c u m u l a t i v e f r e q u e n c y d i s t r i b u t i o n s f o r p o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i t i e s

a t t h e e x ~ e c t e d o u t p u t l e v e l s f o r e a c h o f t h e p r o d u c t s a s *dell a a s p p t o t i c s c a i e

e l a s t i c i t i e s o f c a p i t a l c o s t , ~ a l u e added , and ( t o t a l ) p r o a u c t i o c o s t . ( ~ i 1 f i g u r e s '2nd

t a b l e s a.;peJr a t :he 2nd 3 f t h e t e s t . ) The "e : -pec t e l 3 u t p u t l ~ v ~ i " f o ~ a o i t r t i c t ; ~ - r I

, p r o d u c t i s t h e c : , ~ i ; ; e e r s ' e s t i n a t e of t h e a o s l i : : e lv .:olume of $ ro t iucc lon i n 1975 , r_ivc

- - - - t h a t t h e p r o d u c t would be produced d o z e s : i c a i i v ; i t is t h e l e v e l o f O t ~ t . n , t t . (3" : i , o !~~5::; I o f v h i c h tile p a r m e t e r s o f t h e z o d e i :;eve e s t i x a c c d . 21,' -

Economies of s c a l e a r e ?ecesszr i : - , g r e a t e s t i n c a p i t a l c a s t scxew!lat l e s ~ ir ualac I -

. - 101 TIZ znke-bu:: c h o i c e f o r CL ~ a r ~ i c - i a r e r .dogencus i::::i.raedia~d i;1;31:*1 i ; ~ ti:e : : . 1 ~ : : - . - . /

,, ... ' I A

r 6 a s ~ : !c jOel n i a h t r e q u i r c ~~~ J . s y ~ p t o t i i Cos t :.!cdel ; l ; , n t r2c .u- I r e i r . : p o r t % n & . Zn

~ a r ~ i c u l a r enc!pgexous incerr;:el:~:e i n p u t - is rr: -.-,:!~:el! . i_L ' . .

- , . . . - ne ra to r and.':$-enoEi?.ator 7 . 3 : 3:s " i n c o n s i s t e n c y u car.

c ~ c L ~ n ! - inzke-buy c?:;jice. 1 ," . . . . . , . i I/ ' .;ll b f tile , l u r r . e r i c a 2n;t l . .;si 7 r e s c n t e d ;:l;s sr.c-l~:i? :s ,:ler-:-:ei fri.--: :.:k2 .-.- - - . -- . . > - <

. . .. . , ~ ~ r n m r l - tf?r s ; ) t c i f icaticn :.:;,. .; l:i 3cc_ r ~ , . i ; _, ! . I

Page 17: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

added, and c o n s i d e r a b l y l e s s I n t o t a l c o s t . Asymptotic s c a l e e l a s t i c i t i e s a r e zuch

l a r g e r t h a n t h o s e a t expec ted o u t p u t l e v e l s . The f o l l o w i n g t a b l e s u ~ x a r i z e s t h e s e

f requency d i s t r i b u t i o n s i n t e r n s of the averages and s t a n d a i d d e v i a i t i o n s over t!le 120

S u m a r y S t a t i s t i c s from the D i s t r i b u t i o n s of S c a l e E l a s t i y i t i e s I

A t Expected i

Output Leve l s AsyinFt-o t i c

C a p i t a l Cost Average E l a s t i c i t y 0.640 S tandard D e v i a t i o n 0.241

Value Added Average E l a s t i c i t y 0.751 0 1942 S tandard D e v i a t i o n 0 .211 0 + 0 4 1

I

T o t a l Cost Average E l a s t i c i t y 0.870 0.975 Standard D e v i a t i o n 0.147 0,023

, .ao*, I t w i l l be r e c a l l e d t h a t t h e asympto t ic s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y i s t h e l i n i ~ of t h e

p o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y as t h e volume of production approaches an 0 u 4 ~ u t l e v e l a t I

which - a l l shops a r e o p e r a t e d a t the maximum p o s s i b l e c a p a c i t y . The l o w e s t such ou tpu t I

l e v e l , h e r e des igna ted by xa i s t h e l e z s t common m u l t i p l e of t h e de levan t C k / B k i . The i' I

o u t p u t l e v e l s a t v h i c h econoxics of s c a l e a r e f u l l y e x p l o i t e d a r e exltremeiy l a r g e 1

r e l a t i v e t o t h e expec ted o u t p u t l e v e l s , xe. Below a r e g iven statistics frcx t k e i I

d i s t r i b u c i o r s of t h e e x p o n e n t s of xe and if vhen v r i t t e n q i n s c i e n t i f i c n o t n t i o n . 1 I

I

S u m a r y S t a t i s t i c s from the D i s t r i b u t i o n s of xp and x$ - - ' i - Average Standard Yedian >lode Frequenc:~

Output - 3 o n e n t - Deviat ion Exponen t Espcnent , a t >!ode

. - The a v e r s j e expected o u t ? u t le.;el f a l l s between 100 and 1 ,000 z e t r r c t o n s , -2;-2 t h e

2 4 zveragc y ~ a l u e of za exceeds 10 z e t r i c t c n s .

- ~ t ? e c l a s ~ i c i t : ; of c c s t w i t h r e s p e c t :c s c a l e bet:ieen t1:o dlscre:e ?:lr;:s, t t : ~ I

" i r . ' e r 7 ~ a i t?lastici:;:", ::ill i n g e n e r a l e:<ceeci the p o i n t e;asticj.t;: -r.t$~s?lrec 3: ::;c I I

Page 18: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

, . 3 1 e l a s r i c i t ; e s 2'- d i f f s r z n : o x t p u ~ ieve's. Cxrru: st:-- .- f reqdt .-- c:-tri5:t;or.s - r r

shown f o r p o i n t s c a l e e l a s t < c i t i s s a t --e\-eL3 of C G L ~ L Z ?sxa ; t o ize h s l : ( 2 ' .5 '

t v i cc ( c , ) t h e e x ? s c t e d o u t p u t l e v e : s , a s v l l a s 'or r r e e x c e s t s d o u t p u t L e v s l s L

(E:) , and f o r i a t e r v a l e l a s t i c i t i e s f o r a d z u b l i n g o f ~ u t p u t f rom o c e 3215 t h e

I

e r y e c t e d o u t p u t l e v e l s (E ) and f r o n t h e e x p e c t 2 d o u t p u t l a v e i s ( E l ) . !%ere t h 2 . 5

c u m u l a t i v e f r e q u e n c y d i s t r i b u t i o n s o f c o r r e s p o n c ~ i n g ~ c i n t and i n r e n r a l e l a s t i c i t i e s

d i v e r g e , t h e l a t t e r i s shown by a d a s h e d c u r v e .

D i s t r i ' o u t i o n s o f c o r r e s p o n d i n g p o i n t and i n t e r v a l e l a s t i c i t i e s 20 d i v e r g e , h u t

w i t h monor e x c e p t i o n s o n l y a t e l a s t i c i t 1 1 v a l u e s g r e a t e r t h a n 0 .7 . S w m a r y statistics

f r o n t h e s e d i s t r i b u t i o n s a r e g i v e n be low:

Va lue Added P o i n t S c a i e Elasticities -

Simple Ave rage 0 .655 0 .751 0 .82A

S t a n d a r d D e v i a t i o n 0 .250

~ "-

Value AZdcd I n t e r v a l S c a l e E l a s t i c i t i e s

S i n p l e Ave rage

I S t a n d a r d D e v i a t i c n 0 .268 : 0 .228

- The t - t e s c f o r t h e s i g n i f i c a n c e of n e a n d i f f e r e n c e s nay b e x sed Xu e v a i u a t s t h e 2 " ' - y - - -LA.zh L

I I . . e

II betwee-. t h e 2is t r : l ;u: 'L~~ns rf - 2nd Z arlci t h o s e of c , and E 1: f,>:--,~. - . 5 i ' .,- . d

conparison :i:e t - s t a t i s t i : ls 3 . 6 1 ; i n t !~c l a t t e r i r 55 i.2C. : : e i c i ~ e r L:; cl:rse : - ~ : : ~ : l > : - r

-- - -. -------

-- - - - 7 ,. L = (,'Tc(>:,,,) - .. I ;?: ) , : , - i ; ~ ~ e :c: : 5 < $ ::>:z: ,:c: : - - i d x ) -- c . ) j + I/;? -- - .., i -' 7 Vr 'C !- . - .>-, : : ; 5 - i - ( L . - . . a , - . . . . . -. - . -

" 1 .... .. .+ I L , . cs t ; ,~ t_ s c ~ i e , and :i,, is :;:tj ::lg:-.c:r I , : I : . - . . ~ ~ t U ..:a;,?. .....,. -:,: fixed :hz.:,~ C C ~ : -

,.. - L f ~ n c c i ( . , : : i s ,::.cJ, t;je j . 3 y ~ r - ; ; l - c. : .: :-; :,:~~,:;s =.:,rs,: :,. 1 -.. 1 ' . : , - , . - , . c . 7 i i :, .. . . . . . , '

<,- ,, . . . , , .-7 , > . - - . . . - 7 ., .., l..'3;,.' .. ... . . . ' C

Page 19: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

i s s i g n i f i c a n t a t t h e ten p e r c e n t l e v e l i n a o n e- t a i l e d t e s t .

n , e g r a p h of t h e p o i n t s c a l e e l a s t i c i t y f o r an i n d i v i d u a l a c t i v i t y a g a i h s t t h e

l e v e l of o u t ~ u t h a s a n ascend i -g "saw- tooth" appea rance , s o t h a t p o i ? t s c a l e

e l a s t i c i t i e s measured a t two p s i n t s nay show a d e c l i n e w i t h t h e l e v e l o f o u t p u t i f I

t h e s e t v c p o i n t s l i e on e i t h e r s i d e of a d i s c o n t i n u i t y i n t h e g r a p h . S o n e t h e l e s s , I

t h e a v e r a g e v a l u e s g i v e n above i n d i c a t e a n i n c r e a s e i n b o t h a v e r a g e b c i n t and i n t e r v a l I

s c a l e e l a s t i c i t i e s w i t h a r i s e i n o u t p u t . I I I I

I t 5 s i n t e r e s t i n g t o c o n s i d e r whe the r s c a l e e l a s t i c i t i e s a c r o s s d i f f e r e n t a c t i v i t i e s I I

b a a r any un i fo rm r e l a t i c n s l l i p t o t h e c o r r e s p c n d i n g l e v e l s o f o u t p u t df t h o s e a c t i v i t : e s . I

I T h i s may be accompl i shed by r e g r e s s i n g v a l u e added e l a s t i c i t y v a l u e s a g a i n s t o u t p u t

I

l e v e l s . o u t p u t i n t h i s c a s e i s measured by t o t a l ( d i r e c t ) v a l u e add id i n t h e a c t i v i t y . I

- Df t h e s e v e r a l f u n c t i o n a l f o m s t r i l d , t h a t which gave t h e most z l ean ingfu i relations hi?^ ~ was t h e f o r n : E l a s t i c i t y = I n n, + 3 I n (Value Added), where a and 2 lare p a r a m e t e r s

I . ._ .. li

jihose v a l u e s a r e t o be e s t i m a t e d . The r e s u l t s of f i t t i n g t h i s f u n c t d o n a l f o m a r e

g i v e n below: I

I I

R e g r e s s i o n s of E l a s t i c i t i e s a g a i n s t Value Added 1 I 13 / l

a, 6 I "n - 2

i E s t . - t - s t a t . - st. t - p t a t .

P o i n t E l a s t i c i t i e s I I I

I n t e r v a l E l a s t i c i t i e s

n; t o 2 X? 0.83 1 .53 .078 84 14 .36 ? I . I

I

!.#%ile e a c h of t h e s e r e g r e s s i o n s i s s i g n i f i c a n : a t t h e .01 l e v e l , and i n d i c a t e s hL,g':;t.r

'7

e l a s t i c i E i e s a t h i g h e r o u t p u t ;e;els, t h e X- a r c r a the r low. The u : i e x ? l a i ~ e d v a r l ~ ? . c e

.is due t o d i f f e r e n c e s i n the c c ~ ; o s i t i o n of tile procc.;si;lg t a s k s r e ~ u i r e t i i n 22:h

p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i ty, axd, t o d i f f e r c n c e s i n d e g r e e s o f i n c r e a s i n g re turns $3,1.:;g ti:c:se : , ! s ; : s .

I

131 The : - s t a t i s t i c i n :h is . 2 a . s ~ z e r t a i n s t o t h e ~ < ~ < i f i c n : ~ c : e ci :!:c I c s r l - : a t z 1 s - 3 . - - 1,

Page 20: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

t h r o u g h c:le u s e cf e n d o g e n o u s ir.terr;.t?dia<e ir.:,;~:s. ilr,n-:.zntl.cr.al +sns : s ass?ss

? o t e n t l a l I C ( i n p u t- o u t p u t ) i n t e r d s ~ s x C e n c e I s r o e x a x l 3 ~ ~ $ 2 s : rxc tp re cf t h e I I

n b n a t r i x o f endc genous i n t e r r , e d l a t e i n ~ u t r e q u i r e z e c t c o e f f i c i e n t s . :1!1e h -a:rl;; 12 c:-.c

I . . Korean i - -p l emef i t z t i an e x h i b i t s 2 c i r c u l a r i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e a3or.g endbgexous ix:erec:n:z

I

i n p u t f l o v s , s o i t is 2 o s s i b l e t o o r d e r p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s (and ibnce ?rodu;;s iis I I

w e l l ) i n s u c h a way t h a t X = 0 f o r i > j , which y i e l d s a n upFer t r i / i n g u l a r .A ~ ~ e t r L s . :;/ i j I - I

A more h i g h l y d ;saggregated i ~ p l e n e n t a t i o n rnl.ght e s h i b i t c i r c u l a r i n t e r d e ? e n d e s c e ; l

and , i n a dyna-iic c o d e l t h e r e v o u l d be c i r c u l a r i n t e r d e p r n d a n c e o v e r ( t i z e s i c c e :%

i denand f o r a number of s a p i t a i goods a p p e a r i n g i n t h e n o d e l ? ~ o u l d th4n b e ecdogen izsd .

I I

The A n s t r i x i s a l s o q u i t e sparse; i t s d e n s i t y i s o n i y .O422. The a 4 e r a g e nunber of I I

endogenous i n t e m e d i a t e i n p u t s a o n g t h e 106 ? r o d x c t i o n a c t t v i t i e s r d q u i r i c g t h e n is I

I 5 .8 , w i t h a s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n of 4 . 4 . F i g u r e 1 g i v e s t h e c m , u l a t i v ~ f r e q u e n c y

d i s t r i b u t i o n .

The d e n s i t y o i t h e A - . a t r ix and t h o number of endogencus in:emeldiate i n p u t s per I

p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t y g i v e on ly a vague L a p r e s s i o n of t h e d e g r e e s f I0 l in re rde j a n i e n c e . I I

To o b t a i n a ore d i r e c t ineasure k-e n u s t ask ":her, does i n t e r d s p e n d e n c k ' r r .a tc~r '?" . I I I

One answer i s t h a t i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e n a t t e r s , o r is s i g n i f l c s n t , hen t e o p t i ~ a ; 4- d e c i s i o n ( i . e . t!lat f r o m t h e o p t l r a l s o l u t i o n t o t h e ? I T 1 7 ,odcl) w i t h /esps:: ic a ~ r r d u c t ' . - - LcveL 0.5 produilicn i s n o t t h e sdnc ;IS t h e d c c i s l o n o b t c ? i > c l c-n ;he b k s i s 3 f r,n

- c v a l u a t g n xe ti.ci! c h a t r.ag?cc ts < s t s r d e p e n d e n c e . :4i t h i r ~ t hi is-dledze of the ~ $ i : > c i :

,. -.. * I . - . d e c i s i c n , n'wever, ;.e obviousl:: c a n n o t c c r p a r e i t ;o t h e .!ec<s?.~n rr_4;:7eL: L;.-<:z 2 - t l - - . ,

Page 21: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

.rt,epends cpon d e c i s i o n , t a k e n w i t h r e s p e c t r o . t h e i r p r o d u c t i o n . g/ 11-a a b e n e f i t - c o s t

a n a l y s i s of a s i n g l e a c t i v i t y , e l c b endogenous i n t e r r ' e d i a t e i n p u t shou ld be v a l u e d

at i t s s a r g i n a i s u p ~ l y c o s t , which i s e i t L e r i t s wor ld marke t i g p o r t p r i c e l o r i t s I

z a r g i n a l c o s t of p r o d u c t i o n , depending upon v h e t h e r i t i s o p t i m a l l y inpor:dd o r I

produced. :.;e ;-ill d i s t i r ' g u i s h - between two d i f f e r e n t ways of computing t h e l p r o d u c t i o n

c o s t of a p a r t i c u l a r p r o d u c t : " c o s t a t doroes t ic p r i c e s " , i n which e a c h endo\genous I

I .

i n t e r c e d i a t e i n p u t is v a l n e d ac t h e l e s s e r of i t s i n p o r t p r i c e and i t s margbnal c o s t ,

of p r o d u c t i o n ; a d , " c o s t a t wor ld p r i c e s " , i n which each endogenous i n t e d e d i a t e I I

i n p u t i s v a l u e d a t i t s i a p o r t p r i c e . C l e a r l y , i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e m a t t e r s i f t $e p r o d u c t ' s I

c o s t a t d o m e s t i c p r i c e s i s les_s_ chan i t s impor t p r i c e w h i l e i t s c o s t a t wor id p r i c e s I

e x c e e d s i t s i n p o r t p r i c e , f o r t h e n t h e make-buy c h o i c e w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e 4 rcdEc t I

depends c r i t i c a l l y upon whe the r i t s endogenous i n t e r n e d i a t e i n p u t s a r e o p t h l a l l y ,

produced o r i n p o z t e d . I f c o s t a t wor ld p r i c e s is l e s s t h a n t h e p r o d u c t ' s i n b o r t p r i c e , !

o r i f c o s t a: d o n e s t i c p::i.ces exceeds t h e p r o d u c t ' s i m p c r t c o s t , t h e n t h e nake-buy - i h o i c e i s u n a f f e c t e d by nake-buy c h o i c e s f o r o t h ~ r p r o d u c t s , e x c e p t i n s o f a r 4s t h e

! I

l a t t e r a f f e c t t h e demand f o r t h e p r o d u c t . , I I

The c o n c e p t of " c o s t a t d o m e s t i c p r i c e s " needs t o be c l a r i f i e d , f o r t h e \ m a r g i n a l

c o s t of y rodoc lng a n endogenous i n t e r n e d i a t e i n p u t dooends i n t u r n upon iihethler i t s I

endogenous i n t e m e d i a t e i n p u t s a r e produced o r impor ted , which is a f u n c t i o n bf t h e I . r

3 v e r a l l p a t t e r n o f p r o d u c t i o n . khat ik r e a l l y wanted i s a l o v e r bound on cosk a t I

i o m e s t i c p r i c e s , which c a n be o b t a i n e d i f each e ~ ~ d o g e n o u s i n t e m e d i a t e i n p u t 4s v a l u e d - I - I

~t i t s minimum n a r g i n a l supp ly c o s t . 'The l a t t e r i s g i v e n by p i detcrmided :rdn :he 6

I I - f a r g i n a l Cos t .\lode1 d i s c u s s e d above. I - !

t 1

A measure o f I0 i ! te rdepende; lce i s t h u s p r o v i d c u by t h e d i f f e r e n c e %et:jeen c o s t

t v o r i d p r i c e s 2nd c o s t a t d o n e s t i c p ; ices . (The conc!usion c c n s i d c r s y.~hy t h e s e night

i i f e r . ) ,.'e wiiZ nor ina l i ze t t ? i s d i f f e r e ~ c c t h i s d i f f e r e n c e by e :<z res s ing 1: as n p c r i e : : ~

I ,,e d f IC: in:erc:c~c;-.l i~r;j; l , n L ::;: 5 / - T h i s Faper i s ia rge l : ; < c : ~ c e r z e d ; ; i t t i :!>e " ;>rLce" s'.ri

I

Page 22: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- 7

$1 r ~n ,? : l abe l . leL "Endogeao:~ ; n t cmed la ie Ir:nu; l:ostf' r e r t z i n s ;{ :he

. , perce:;caee d i f f s r ? n c % 5jet;jeen t h e *;a iue zf 2 n i o g e : : ~ u s i n t e r . . e i i l z ~ e ir.;~-:ds ct ;.:orir:

I

? r i c e 5 a n d t h a t a,; docestic ? r i c e % ; I

~ S?.dogcr:cus In ternedia tc- . I n p u t 2 2 5 t ::?asurn =

-,

f" ! !

Page 23: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- . T h i s Zeascr-l has r a r t i c x l a r sign;:- rcna:e b e c ? x s ? , i n t!ie a b s e n c e of caca<i t : \ ' .-:.ar;,l, - - i t c s n be s l c : . ~ zo g i - e a n y ? ? e r 5z-nC t o t h e 3 3 s t ~f n s g i e c ~ l n g i n t e r d e p e r - d e n z e

>fI? objec:iy:e f u ~ c c i z n val-e 5ue :c h a v i n g xada t h e . ~ ~ r o n g d e c i s i o n on rbe~3'asf~.'of a

p a r t i a l , b e c e f i t - c o s t c r i t e r t o c . - i 6 / Tke z a r g i n a l c o s t z e a s u r e i s p ~ s i t i - ~ ~ e in E?,?

s a j o r i t y o f c a s e s . However, i n nz case d o e s i t exceed 20 p e r c e n t . The l a r g e d i f f e r e - c e

S e t u e e n v a l u e s of t h i s z e a s u r e and t > o s e cf t h e ecdogenous i n ~ e n e d i a t e ifipuK c o s t

z e a s u r e i s due t o t h e r e l a r i v e u n i s p o r t a n c e of endogenous i n t e m . e d i a t e i n ? u t s i n t o t a l

p r o d u c t i o n cost , which I s f i l r t h e r d i s c u s s e d be low.

The l a s t o e a s a r e of I0 i n t e r l e p e n d e n c e i s t h a t w i t h r e s p e c t t o ave raSe c o s t a t

t h e e x p e c t e d i e v e l of o u t p u r . I t l z c k s t h e s i g n i f i c a n c e o f t h e m a r g i n a l c o s t x e a s u r e ,

f o r a v e r a g e c o s t h a s no p r e s c r i ; l t i - ~ e s i g n i f i c a n c e . Y o i ~ e t h e l e s s , i t i s of scme i n t e r e s t .

The a v e r a g e c o s t n e a s u r e cco;pz.res x J e r a g e p r o d u c t i o n c o s t when endogenous i n t e m e d i a t e

i n p u t s a r e v a l u e d a t i n ? o r t p r i c e s v i t h a v e r a g e p r o d u c t i o n c o s t when endogenous

i n t e r m e d i a t e i n p u t s a r e v a l u e d a t ;he l e s s e r of a v e r a g e p r o d u c t i o n c o s t and impor t

p r i c e , i . e . a t p i t a k e n f rom t i e Average C o s t Hade l d i s c u s s e d above . A s i n t h e o t 3 e r

z e a s u r e s , t h e d i f f e r e n c e i s e x p r e s s c 5 a s a p e r c e n t of t h e f o m e r a v e r a g e p r o d u c t i o n

c o s t . !Je vili @;;\it a s t n t e c e ~ . ~ o f tF.e a a t h e n ~ a t i c a l f o r m u l a , f o r i t nay be e a s i l y i n i t t e n

dosm by t h e reader . As t h e n a r g i n a ; c o s t E e a s u r e v i t h r e s p e c t t o a p a r t i c u l a r ? T G ~ U C E

may be s h o ~ n t o 5e l e ss t h a n h x cql-al t o t h e e n d o g e n o u s ' i n t e r a e d i a t e i n p u t c o s t -.easure,

S O nay t h e aa:eragc c o s t n e a s u r e I:e s!;cr;r: t o b e less t h a n o r t :qual t o ::!)e : - ; rg i~ ln l c o s t

- measure . F i g i ~ m 3 c l e a r l y 2 e : n o ~ s c r s c c s t h i s r e l ~ t i o n s : ~ Lp.

.a 6

The tab le- below g i v e s a v e r a g e ;-al-es f c r e a c h o f c!;e r e a s u r e s o v e r :he 106 r r c d E c t i o r . - B a c t i v i t i e s r c q 3 r crldogcnons I;::er-ebiate i n p c c s : t

iralues of the :.!eas.:r.-s cf I0 1 n : c r d e ~ c n d e n c e (percent:-

$'-p:e t \ v e r 3 ~ , ~ St;?r.~!arii. Dp~:Lr; t iLn .. A ... - Endogcr.ous I n t e ~ e d i a t e I~. ;LEs 39.9 2 ; . 3

: I a r g i n a l C a s t 5 . 7 3 . -t t?*~.?ragr Cos: A.6 -. . I

Page 24: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

c f A.vs . - L G g e ,-- :n 71 J I - t n e . L - u . q n c;L- .--.-i..; ,.ies. I I

I

1 ., . . . . . C . L ? . . : . : ~ ~ G X , ' " ; r o c ~ s ~ . e:~i::er,: ;p~.c-i;,?&tes a she.;., 2:~s; -: i-,.c: its. :! T: i. ' - ' '-,---

. , . .- ..... c

. .

; , I s ;, - en . , ' I 1: , - L C is u s e d i ? - ; h e rsduction cf ? o r e . r3a:i a single proclac. . 1 . .

+3: :. - .;-. -. -., ., - A . L ..;e ;!a-je 30: ):et c , - n s i d c ~ ? c ! s :??ut ians C P ?.!IF i ) ~ c k ~ ; e : ~ l , ;ie il41i cnl:: -s?e::::

~

Page 25: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

;.notk?r I 3 d i s a t i o n o f t h e ;cte.-.Ciai s i g c i f i c e n c e of c a ~ a c i t y i n t e r d e p e n e e n c e

i s g i v e n ir. T z S l e 1, :i:?ish gi':.--s a ~ r c s s - t a b u l a t l a n of tTzo characteristics of eacI:

? r c d u c t < = r , z:ti7qLc::: a c r o s s :he cc:x.r.s a r e s:?c~.T. t k e ?.cr'cer cf p r o c ? s s ( e l ecen r , s I

r e q u i r e 2 i3 t h e p r o d ~ c t r o n cf 3 2 ~ r r i c ~ ~ l a r p r o d x c r ; d o n t h e r c v s a r e sh~c.,.~ t h e ' & ~

I

nunber of c-ene p r o c e s s e l e z e c t s xhlch xay p c ~ e z ~ i a l l : ~ be s3arsd w i t h other p r o d u c t i c n -

I

a c t i v i r i e s . To g i v e an er rzzple of >.OW t5.e t a b l e i s i o 3e r e a d , cons ider1 tts e n t r i e s

i n zhe c o l u z n headed by t h e-unber 3: a t o t a i cf t e n ; r o d u c t l o n a s t i v i t i k s r e q u i r e s I i

~ r o : e s s i n g i n p u t s from t h r e e p r e c e s s e l e x e n i s ; Ln :zc 05 t h e s e a c t i v i t i e i , ~ n i y one I I

of t h e t ! ~ r e e ? r s c e s s e l e x e n t s i s p c t e n t i a l l y s h a r e d , T;hereas i n s i x of t$,en, s i i t h r e e

I p r c c e s s s l s z e n t s a r e p o t e n t i a l l y sb.ared. I

I Onl:; f i v e ou; of t h e 129 p r c d ~ c t i o n a c t : - ~ i ~ i e s e x h i j i t 20 potentialli~terde?endence

i - ihroug!l c i z z c i t y s h a r i a g . O r t h e c t h e r hand, 46 o u t of t h e 120 a c t i v i t i a s e i i i b i t ;he

I

naxixur? ~ o t e n c i a l i i : te raeper ,dence , r eq1~ i r i r . g ?recessing c 2 l y i n potential l l : : s h a r e d I

proccs-5 e l e z e n r s . The r e n a l n i n g a c t i v i t i e s f a l l betxeen t h e s e t v o extre- 'es , S u t ."I

h genera.11:; :;he nu,cber of p o t e : l t i a l l y s!lared p r c c e s s e l e z e n t s i s g r e a t e r t h n :.3e ~ u z b e r

G £ un-shar.?d T r o c e s s e.lerr.ents. I

I T h e c r c s s - t a b u l a t i o n ir. I a b l e 1, v h i l e Kcre s a c i s f a c c o r y th,n t h e d e b s i t y Z e a s u r e ,

I I

f a i l s t o t a k e a c c o u n t of s o c t d i f f e r e n c e s amocg p r c c e s s e l e n e a r s . ~ i ~ u r e i i g i v e ; -!ie

c u m u l a t i v e f r e q u e n c y d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e p r o p o r t i o n of shop c o s t i n p o t e n i i a l l y s h a r e d I J , r p r o c e s s e l e z e n t s a t t h e e x p e c t e d o u t p i t l e v e l s f o r t h e 120 p r o d u c t i o n a c t y v i t i e s . i

"Shop c o s t " r e f e r s t o t h e t o t a l c o s t of t h o s e ~ r c c e s s i n g ' n p u t s which e :chib i t i n c r e a r i r g I

: I r e t u r n s -- c a p i t a l a n d i r i d i r e c t l a b o r ' and n a i e r i a l s . Cn a v e r a g e , 7l4.7.4e;cent o f t h e

I

t o t a l shop c o s t i n c u r ~ e d i n p r o d u c t l c n i s i n .;ocent',ali:: s h a r e d p r o c e s z e1,e:nents. i. o r I

e ; n o r e t h a n ;;air' of the-activities, p o t e n t i a l l y s h a r e d ?recess e i e n e n t s ;ecolunr: i a r r.cre

:ban 40 p e r c e n t of she? cos:. I t i s t o 5e ~ o t e ? t 5 a : t h c s e f i g x r e s a r c c?-,er ?.-l:r.Cs

/ . - on t h e p r e p c r t i o n c i sho? c c s t IT. ;.:::a112 s h a r e ? ~rzzcrs e l c x e n ~ s , S F T C E t h e :. . - i - : . . : ~ : l ~

- - . n r . . . . . . c f p o t e n t i a l s h a r i r ~ g r.jould be rca!i zed zn: ;; ;.ere z,- > r ~ ~ . ; ~ t i ~ ~ zc :ivl';<e:: -.: 8 .

o p e r a t e d .

Page 26: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

. . i . . . . . . . y'.-,c - .,. ,,- . . . , LI.-- :CP. - 2 ~ 3 : s : 2 2 9 n o t '22 h s c r ~ : , " d=r ~ x a l . r ~ c : ; s ~ ~ Z ' J Z ~ : T ~ : S ( . :T: n r h e r -.LL?. . 3 .;:.<--~:

. I I . -

2 ~ 5 5 - r . z ry fas:?.,5;., 1 : ~~~:~~~~ :J a:; ~ a , ~ ~ - ; ~ ~ x ~ i $ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ 1 ST!:; ~2 .:!,? ~5 Le; -;:--: -- --- I

<,,t - - v - f l .,-,. i;,,c~s ?otentiz?l:; produced wi th i : , it. i I

-. . - . 1 . 1:;ers ~ r i t .z nu ...; ,er sf spi.~:::: mensuro,s 3f ? c t e n t - l a 1 ~z~z : iT ' ) ; : . x r e r d ~ ; : ~ ~ e . n c c , ~

Page 27: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

I t i s 2 z s i l v d e ~ o n s t r a t e d t>at t h e sncp c o s t 7 .easure is lsss t h a n t h e 5iue.d cos:

s e a s u r e , f c r t h e v a r i a b l e ccn;3nen: of sho? c c s t is rhe same w i t h azd wic>.out s k a r i r . ~ . I

A :. g o e n t t s r e f l e c c i o n c i l l s u f f i c e t o e s t a b l i s h t h a t t h e p c t e b t i a l f i x e d cc s ; I

t L s a v j c g s d u e t o c a p a c i t y s h a r i r s denends upon th2 ncmber c f shops r q u i r e d ~ ~ ~ i t h i n t h e I I

?recess e l m e n t w i t h o u t s h a c l z g and the n u ~ n b e r of production a c t i v t i e s r e q u i r i - g i f ipu t ; t f r o 2 t h e p r e c e s s e l e m e n t . T h i s f o l l o w s b e c a u s e t h e n a x i n u n p o s s i b l e r e d u c t i o n i n t i e

n l laber of s h o p s r e q u i r e d u n d e r s h a r i n g i s e q u a l t o t h e number of p o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s r z!ros c z e . x/ Given t h e n u s b e r of p r o d u c t i o n s c t i v i t i e s , t h e n a x b u n p o t e a t i a i s ~ v i i l g s

I

j s g r e a t e r t h e f e w e r t h e nuxbe r of s h o p s r e q u i r e d w i t h o u t s h a r i n g ; g i v e n t h e nmber of

I s n o ~ s r e q u l r e d w i t h o u t s h a r i n g , t h s na :<in~m 7 o t e n t i a : s a v i n g s i s g + e a t e r t h e i a r g e r t h e 1 n u n b e r of p r o d u c t i o n ~ d c t i v i t i e s .

7- : r 3 u r e . 5 g i v e s s e v e r a l . c u z u l a t i v e f r e q u e n c y , d i s t r i b u t i o n s of h e n u n b e r o f s h o p s t r e q u i r e d i n i n d i v i d u a l F r o c e s s E. .Ren t s . These a r e b a s e d on t h e e p e c t e d l e v e l s cf li o u t p u t . ' P l a t l a b e l e d "Vnshared P r o c e s s " c e ~ i e n t s " p e r t a i n s t o t h e 1 5 4 p r o c e s s e i en l en t s ~ r e q u i r e d i- b u t a s l n g i e p r c d u c t i o n a c t i v i t y . Cr.e s n c p i s needed I n t h e n a j o r i r ; , , 1 2 5

t o b e e x z c t , of t h e u n s h a r e d F r o c e s s e l e m e n t s . The g r e a t e s t n u b e of s h o p s r e q u i r e c

i n a n u n s h a r e d p r o c e s s e l e m e n t i s 100. Tvo c a i n u l a t i v e f r e q u e n c y d A s t r i b c t i o n s a r e t g i v e n f o r a l l p r o c e s s e l e n e n t s , u n s h a r e d and p o t e n t i a l l y s h a r e d a l ' k e . That l a b e l e d

"With S h a r i n g" p e r t a i n s t o t h e n m b e r of s h o p s ceeded when f u l l ad a n t a g e i s t aken of I . sha r ing among t h e i 2 0 p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s . . TRa t l a b e l e d " U l t h o u t S h a r i n g" i s based cn

I

t i . . a s s u m p t i o n t h z t 1'0 a d v a n t a g e w h a ~ s c e v e r i s t a k e n of p o t e n t i a l { h a r i n g : i n o t h e r i o r d s ,

a p r o c e i s e l e m e n t i s assumed t o . i n v o l v e d i n t h e product i .on of o d l Y a s i n g l e j r ~ d u c t . & I

The nurnber of p r o c e s s e l e n e n t s 05 t h i s a s s u n p t i c n i s o i c o u r s e ir.ucd l a r g e r than i n t h e

* I I

c a s e s j i t h s h a r i n g : t i le nydribers am r e s p e c t i v e l y 802 znd 305. The r /unber 502 c o r e s f r c r I

t h e facr !!-at t h e 3 m a t r i x c a n t a i x s 802 ncn -ze rc e l e y e n c s . I

Page 28: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

ca-,zzit;: s h a r i n g ~ e ~ i t s a ? o t e n c l a i raduc t i . on b1.7 greater :hz:. 5 b 2ercer.t i n +!it3 ::L!::?+L. I

. - . . of s n c ? s r e q u i r e - . Tke s a v i n g s is substantia?lp l e s s .<hen s - - - - - c ~ c c z n t e z x sf -;;:cr, 20s : . I

. - :ic~zt?,,a? e s s , shop c s s t i r p c t e r i t t a l l y rsd7,ced by -nois t h n 50 ?erceri: : 12 13 ;.c----- - e L . L ~ 2 .-:-

I

I - . sk2:zZ ? r a c e s s e lenencs , a d Sy :gre than 25 percsn: i n 2 9 o r z : + s c . 7-2 z-:ersge I

? o c s n t i a l f i x e d cosr savings is 33.0 p e r c e n r , xhile :he average b c ~ e z ~ i a i s h o ~ -0s: 1 I

savicgs is 1 G . 9 percen:. - 20/ 1

Page 29: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

III. The Consequences of I n t e r d e p e n d e n c e

The f o r e g o i n g a n z l y s i s d e n o n s t r z t e s t h a t t h e model a s implenqnted i n t h e Korelil I

c a s e e x h i b i t s s u b s r z n t i a l i n c r e a s i n g r s t x r n s a s 1.211 as s i g n i f i c a n t d e g r e e s of p o t e n t i a l

a r e b e l i e v e d t o be q u i t e c l o s e t o t h e g l o b a l opt ima; i n any e v e n t , it is k n o w t h a t :>r;i

g i v e upper bounds t o t h e g l c b a l l y o p t i z a l v a l ~ e s of t h e x i a t h e f $ l l YIP n o d e l i \

augnen ted by t h e p r c d u c t i o n upper b o u n d s . z / I I I

I

i n p n t - o u t p u t and c a p a c i t y i n ~ e r d e p e n d e n c e . !i'e now tu r r ; t o examine i the consequences by I

- I

referenc:e t o s o l u t i o n s t o t h e :;IP nociei. Because of cke l a r g e n u d e r of i n t e g e r 1

v a r i a b l e s c o n t a i n e d i n r h e ~ o d e l , and hence t h e h i g h c c s t a n t i c i p a d e d t o o b t a i n p rovea

I

A s i n d i c a t e d i n T a b l e 2 , s o l u t i o n s v e r e o b t a i n e d under n i n e a l ( e r a n t i w i e s ? e c i f i c a t i o n s

g l o b z l l y o p t i m a l s o l u t i o n s , w e d i d n o t a t t e n p t t o u s e a f o r a a l x i x e d

I of t h e key p a r a m e t e r s . To t e s t f o r t h e e f f e c t s of e c o n o n i e s of scal le, t:~c s e t s o f upper 1 bounds v e r e used i n a d d i t i o n t o t h e expec ted o u t p u t l e v e l s . I n s p e c l i f i c a t i o n s 51 and 53

I

i n t e g e r ? rograming

I

t h e u p p e r bounds a r e r e s p e c t i v e l - i one h a l f and t w i c e t h e expec ted oultput l e v e l s . I n I

a l g o r i r h o . I n s t e a d , us o b t a i n e Z a s o l u t i o n under each pa ramete r s p L c i f i e a t i o n u s i n g a I

methcd t h a t is s k e t c h e d i n :he Appendix. T h i s ne thcd r e q u i r e s that1 upper bcunds on t5.e I

p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s b e added t o t h e n o d e l . Given t h e s e upper b o u n l s , t h e s o l u t i o n s I

I

compar ison t o t h e b z s i c r p e c i f i c a t i o n , F1 and F3 i s o l a t e t h e i n p a c t b f a 33-113 p e r c e n t I I

r e d u c t i o n and i n c r e a s e r e s p e c t i v e l y , i n t h e f o , r e i g n exchange r a t e , { ~ h i l e t h e a v e r a g e L I

I

w d g e r a t e i s r e s p e c t i v e l y i n c r e a s e d by 50 and 100 p e r c e n t i n s p e c i f i l a t i o n s L? and L 3 . I

F i n a l l y , t h e e f f e c t s of a 50 p e r c e n t r e d u c t i o n and i n c r e a s e , r e s p e c t i v e l y , i n t h z ' d

i n t e r e s t r a t e nay be e v a l u a t e d t!lrough s p e c i f i c a t i o n s Kl and K3. 22/) I - i ic i i iz eacR p n i r , I - -

s o l u t i o n s a r e o r d e r e d i n ' l a b i e d s o t h a t t h e pnraineter ~ ~ e c i f i c a r i o n f o r w h i c h l p e s t i c I

I I

p r o d u c t i o n c o s t s a r e l e z s t r e i a t i ~ e t o i z - ,o rc c c s t s appears on t!:e l d i t .

Page 30: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

. . IrcS,?cs i -r ;:hich t:?e L i C Z X X = ~ s r g l r . a l c o s t or' prcui~c:Lcr, :.:.r: ;,:- :c +:

i~3~.=3 (1;; > a r e i:: a c l a s s 5:; t 'r..enselves f i.r the:; a r e c n r i r ---- ?gli:; i2.sr>rr.^.l2 I;T~S;=- ;l.,;~ A I - - -

I - .

c f c z ~ z c i t y sh,arlr?g. >n.or.g tI.2 remaining a c t i v i t i e s , -;:.e 3.2. a l ? d l c a t s < zhc -...----- .. -..,L t. -

2 r o l - c e i at

-'. e;, p r c 2 u z e d oelow t h e naxinurn e i ~ p c t level -z i :ho~c s l ~ a r i n g . ,VIL., but1 O C . ~ escep:lc-2 c.v-.:

2;: r:-.e specifications, i k e r ? t i s e l ouipu: lev?: i s r s i o if i: is Less t!?a- i k e z~:-:.~,Lx

I ;!ut l e v e l .

Li .32 3 .3 i n d i c a t e s t h e z u i ~ b e r u f p r a l u c r i produces unde r sbari::g. O ~ c e -:-aclr:;

s h a r i n g Is p e r m i t ~ e d , production is r i a r r a n r e d f o r s e v e r a l

;reduced i n i t s a b s e n c e . F o r e x a n p l e , t i 4 0 ( 6 1 n i n u s 59)

a c t i v i t i e s become p r o f i t a S l e when c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g is

specification. I n a l l c a s e s , if i t is p r c f i t a b l e t o aryor.d p r o d u c ~ i o n u n d e r iipaci:?

s h a r i c g , t h e n i t i s p r o f i t a b l e t o do s o t o t h s rnasii;.u~-, f f e z s i b i e ex e n t . ?:c:.t slz;;:fi.:c=:-

. . t o :he cot&: number of ?rodu:tic?n a c t i v i t i e s i n tile n o i ? ~ i . :i~r.c?:!: ~ C S T , a s n e .:;;!IK

eTJ.pect, c n p a c t r y s h a r i n g i.5 ~f g r e a t a s t irnyortan.:e a t :r,e !L>h;es: a of

- 1 . :. - - . , L - ,.<-,: t:m ~n::izun o u t p u i l e v l s , S 1 , ;.liere e i g h t make-buy :-.i:c;'ces a r e revers,.? 3 : ~ i'.: i--.-..

i n t o [he anal.:ir;:s. . ; 'art sz c;l the r n i . i e gi:.: .3 :oc-. l ~ 3 1 2 ~ adctt'.:! <:.I :1:.:~.1 ~r;:,~i?~:y lL>::, . . . . . . : , 3 . +. f i t i c - . . ! . . . .. -.

, . ~ - . --

Page 31: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

f 0 r . e ~ i s e q u a l t o t h e la::er l e s s :he c c t a l f i x e d c c s t s . Tp,ese e s t i n a t e s pertain ~2

a11 e q u i - p r o p o r t i o n a l expar . s icn cf t h e o u t p u t of a l l t h e p roCuc t s produced ~ 5 t h s ? , a r l ~ . - 5 - 3 i x c 2 f i x e d c o s t s a r e g r e a r s r i n t h e a b s e n c e of c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g , ~ c o n o c i ~ s of s c a l e ;re

u n i f o z 1 y g r e a t e r x i r h o u t ~kiring. On a v e r ~ g e , Lhe d i f f e r e r i c e i s b.5 1 J r i 27 i of t k e

e l a s t i c i t y v i t h s h a r i n g .

E f f e c t s c f Caps : i t y I n t e r d e ~ e c d e n c e

. . . -..av~ng l a i d t h e n e c e s s z r y f o u n d a t f o x s , we nag now examins t h e ( consequences of I

i n t e r l e p e n d e n c e i n the p r e s e n c e of increasing r e t u r n s . Ice w i l l r e v r s e t h e o r d e r of t h e i ? r s c e i i n g s e c t i o n azd i n i t l a l i y t a k e LQ t h e e f f e c t s of c a p a c i t y

r i r s ~ l i c e of f i g u r e s i n Par t E of T a b i e 2 g i v e s t h e r e a l i z e d

z o s t s as a F e r c e n c of t o t a l fiscd c o s t s w i t h o u t s h a r i n g o v e r

p roduced u i t 5 s h a r i n g . TEe r e a l i z e d s a v i n g s i n t o t a l f i x e d c o s t s ib 2 4 . 6 p e r c e n t L?

t h e S a s i c spec i f ica : i .cn . -2-s a p e r c e n t of t c t a l v a l u e added , t h e c s t savLngs i s of i c o u r s e zuch l e s s ; i t is on::: 3.3 p e r c e n t ( s e e t h e f i g u r e s on l i n e E 1 . b ) . Lcokizg I a c r o s s t h e c a b l e , c z e s e e s :?at t h e c o s t s a v i n g s due t o capacity s a r i n g i s a f f e c t e d d by c h a n g e s i n t h e ke:: p a r a z e z e r s , p a r t i c u l a r l y t h e l e v e l of denand. As s i g h t be es- ,ecrei i ,

t h e c c s t s a - l i n g s i s a?precFa- . ly i i i ghe r i n r e l a t i v e t e r n s a t lower s c a l e s cf c u t ~ c t .

:lore i n t e r e s t ' n g i s t h e c i i e c t of c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g c n make-buy c k i c c s f c r i i i d i - i i d u i ?

p r o d u c t s . C a p a c i t y i n t e r d e ~ c z d ~ n c e may a f f e c t t h e nake- buy c h o i c e £ r a p r o d u c t i f i:s P m a r g i n a l 2 r o d u c t i o n c o s t i s less tl-ia~. i t s iz-qort p r i c e w h i l e i t s i ; n p L r t r W i c e i s l e s s

. I

t h a n i t s n a r g i x a l p r c d u c t i c c c 3 s t p l u s a v e r a g e d i r e c t f i x e d c o s t s x i hou t s h n r i z g ; I I I - 1 :ci i s ail q p e r bo~!:d cn the .c. .kl of o u t p u c . S ~ c b a p r c d u c t would b opil:l:ndll;r i l 7~c . r t t ? i i

L

i - . . wi thouc s t i s r i n g , -:ut x i g h t 5e s r c i u c e d unde r s ! l z r ing . Scnewhat l e s s e:<tre-e ;s .b!:e c::se

r w

~f a = -,dxcT :;hic1; 5s Q c:? - --.... - . : d i e d ... ar,.d : L x ; 7 ~ t ~ e l :n ' the a5se::cc of s ? \ ; i r i n < ; ; . c y . ~ : i t::

Page 32: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- .- - I -!- - 1 J 3 + Ci - A sj-! xe I

L h*O 0 j d A , ~ 1 0 '

I

wSere 1 is :he s e t o f ? r o d u c c s opt:-ally p roduced w i t 5 o u t s h a r i n g , a n d p i s :?.e Ic;:e; :: I j

k u n d on t h e a l r g i n a l i o i c of t h e j ' i h p r c d x c t c o n p u t r e f r o n t h e :!arkinz; C C S C > l o i e i . I I - :Ye f i r s t :ompleta t e n above i s t h e t o t a l d i r e c t f i x e d c c s t t o p r c d y c e i t e n i c ~ . t e r

~ 0

capacit. . ; s h a r i n g ; i t L s t h e s u n of t h e f i x e d c o s t s u f t h e a d d i t r o n a l s h c p s requi ;eJ I

6' , r e c t l : ~ t o p r o d u c e i t e x i v i v e n ;he +:i.xed c o s t s t!lat a r e i n c u r r e ? m d e r t!le p a t t e r : C' " I

of p r a d u c t f o n w i t h o u t s h a r i c g . For $1 l u s i r a t i o n , w e have a s s u n e d t h j t 2iodi:c;s

o p t i m a l l : ~ ?reduced vichour : s h a r i n g a r e o p t i n a l l : ; p roduced a t t h e i r e - ~ e c t e d l e v e l s and 1 - I t h a t t h e p r o d u c t i n q u e s t i o n s h c u l d b e p roduced a t t h e e s p e c t e u l eve l , w i t h sharing.21, '

I -

I - - . - The secor.d t e n , i ~ . 1 -/ 13 t h e f 017llia above g i v e s t h e l i x e r bqxild il: tile :12rpAr,2_

c o s c of p r o d u s i n g t h e i ' t h duct. F u r t h e m o r e , :I?e e n t i r e f c m u ? a o - i t s i d i r e c t I L'lxed c f 3 s t s . For twc I n t e r - r e l a t e d r e a s c n s , tht.1, t h e forz!u la gLvc-s a 1or;er bouxd 0,:

I

p r c d u e t i i s o b t a i n e d . I n Xee?ing w i t % oar a p p r o a c h i n che ? r e v F o c s l s r c t - ' c n , ~ t . w i l l . C '* I - -:

:i~e t q a l c o s t of p r c d u c i n g i t e z i0 ~ ~ ~ d e r c a p a c i t : ~ s h a r i n g . I f t'ls

- 5 I

r e z s u r e t h e e f f e c t s of c a p a c i t y i n t c r 5 e z e n d e n c e b;: Lhe i i f f a r e n c e i - e t l e e r ur.it ~ ~ 7 7 1 ~ * r

bound i s d i - ~ l c e d

by t l ic velum of p r o d u c t i o n , , a Icxer >ound on t h e c n i t c c s t \ < i t 9 s h a r l n g c: I

Page 33: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

f o r ir is t h e cc s t r;LnlnFzi?.g u n i t s u p p l y c o s t w i t h o u t s h a r i n y . Furt'nel-i-.ere, eT.-er.

- ,;,ough .- ;:se or' i5.e l -ccr : ; r i ~ t ? . u n l e r s t a t e s t h e p r o d ~ ~ c t i c n c o s t s a v i n g s d u e t o ca?a:ic:.

Line 5 . Z . a . i . i n 7 a 3 l e 2 g i - ~ e s r h e u e t g n t e d a v e r a g e s u p p l y :os;

r e d u c t i o n ( i . e . i t s xpaer S e c n d ) d u e t o c a p e c i t y s h a r i n g o v e r t h o s C C I ? r o d x c t s t xhi:h s n s u ? d be produced u z d e r s k a r i z g , t h e w e i g h t s b e i n g p r o p o r t i d n a l t o the t o t a l

I ccst of i z ? ~ r ; i z g t h e i a p r o a u c t s i n a a o u n t s e q u a l t ? t h e i r e x p e c t e d o u t ? u t l e ~ e l s . F o r

I

e x a q i e , t k e e s t i - a t 2 cf 13.7 ? e r c e n t a p p e a r i n g u n d e r t h e c o l u n n f o r t h e b a s i : !

s h a r i ? . j , i t d c e s g i v e a? cF-,er ocur.d t o t h e p e r c e n t a g e s u p p l y c o s t

i n d i r e c t f i x e d c o s t s a r e taken i n t c a c c o u n t .

s p e c i f i : a t i o n s c z t e s (a? u?32r Sound on ) che p e r c e n t a g e r e d u c t i o n due t o c a p a c l t y

s h a r i r - g iz t h e a g g r e g z t e s c ~ p l y c o s t o f t h e two CCI p r o d u c t s t h a t o g h t t o Se I

r e d u c t i o n ;-F,e.?

p r o d u c e d ~ n d e r t h a t s p e r i f i : z = i o n . 2 5 / - Lir,? Z .2 .a . i : s t a t e s t h e r e d c t i c n i n a g g r e 3 z t e I siip?1;1 c o s t a s a p e r c e n t cf tots1 v a l u e added w i t h o u t s h a r i n ~ c v e r 11 t h o s e a c t i v i t i e s

I

producerl u n d e r s h a r i n g . ;his is t o i n d i c a t e t h e n a g n i t c d e of t h e c d s t r e d n c t i c n o \ f r I

t h e CCI ? r c d u c t s t h a t c u g h t t o be p roduced r e l a t i v e t o a s e c t o r - v i a a g g r e g a t e . ' ; h i i z

t h e a g g r e g a t e c o s t s a 7 ~ i 2 g d s e t o c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g i s c e r t a i n l y n o t r i v i a l i n r e l a t i 0 2

t o t h e a g g r e g a t e s u p p l y z o s t of t h e p r o d u c t s a f f e c t e d , i t i s r a t h e r t r i v i a l i n r~:zticn

t o a g g r e g n t e val1.e adds.', as i~ i s i e s s t h a n one t e n t h of a p e r c e n t E tl-e l ~ : t ? r . I.

L iL produced u n d e r si!arir,g z F t h a r c m p a r a b l e f i g u r e f o r C C i p r o d u c t s t h a 0ugF.r ?ct, ~ o Se

produced u n d e r . ; h a r i n g . i n t h i s c a s c , t h e dif :cr t lncc !- .e txeen i z y o r t p r i .c .in2 ::nit c c s c

i t i s of i n t c r e s t r o c c n p a r e t h e c o s t s a v i n g s f o r C C I p r o d u c t s

f o r a n i n d i v i d u z l p roduc ; i s r ! c ~ a t i v e . Chon e x p r e s s e d n s n p e r ~ q n t *i ri:e i r p o r t pi-5::c

t h n t o u g h t co 5e

Page 34: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

j e in:r2zs2d Sp a t i e z s t 43 .6 F e r c e n t -,.ere i t p r o d ~ c e d , Sut t n e a b s lir? ~ ~ , : ~ z s z i in c J i r ~s g r e a t e r Chin 3r e ~ c a l i C o n i y 0.01i p e r c e n t c f t o t a l v a ~ J e added.

. . , S i = i i l s r s s t i z a t e s a r e g i ~ f s n i n :>it t a b l e f o r all t h e s p e c i f i : s t i c n s . Ti? ;..ae:tic-,

*. . I r l g u r e 7 g i v e s t h e l i f f e r e n c e 5ezveen t h e ~ : i i : c o s t m l e r s h a r i n g a . d t h e <.-?:I: ?rice - .

s t a t e d a s a perc~: r i t ~f t h e l i i t t e r f a r e a c h cf t h e CC; p r o d u c t s x d e r E . B C ~ ~pe~ill:~'_<311: I

f o r cc i .venicnce , :: a l s o sho4.s :ils - i e i g h t e d 2ver;des. S e v e r a l c b s e r / v a t i o n s .xay be ::ad-

I , - . oil t :~e b a s i s of t h e s e d a t a . Cirst , w i t h r 2 s F e s t t o i n d i v i d ~ l l C C I p r o d u c t s which sr.cu-:

-h-,. 7h be 2rodu:ed unde r ~ h a r i n g , t h e c o s t s a - ~ i n g s d u e t o shart3g c ~ n :>e qdi:e l a r q e , ...L~, b

i t 2xhibLt.s s u b s t a n t i a l - f a r l a 3 l l i : y a c r o s s p r o d u c t s ; the r a n g e i s f r m 60.50 p e r c e n t k t o O . l l p e r c e n t of the p r o d u c t ' s i z p o r t rest ( s e e F i g u r e 7 ) . i l e i g h t d a v e r a g e s c v e r ail

Ehe C C I p r o d u c t s t h a t cug'nt t o be produced under a g i v e n s p e c i f i c a t i n e s h l ' s i t 2 l s s s a r

r a n g e , f r o n 2 4 . 7 n r r c e n t c f t h e f r o g g r c j a t t : i iyporr c a s : o n d c r il ic :crT

u ~ d e r ! i ? e c i f i , a ~ i o n S 3 . I n t u r n , r e l a t i v e t c

a g p r e g a t e c o s t s a v i r . g s i s q u i t 2 s p a l l , c;Lt!l a naslxun

. - . q u a r t e r 3f one ~e r : . . cn : u n d e r s p e . r i f ' , c a c i s n 5 1 , w l ? i c i ; ~ : ~ i u i : : e , s tr;c - 5 : . :tb.:ci . : ;;~rr:.-::-.ri. -, - I >

b C n e :;cuLd c:cn,ec:i the coi?seq>j-lp-nccz c f cap;;cic:: s h a r i n ~ cc: b e Cre t c r t h e ;L):dcr i~ r l : e i

- . r i e c t S ... --...-, ........ T - . I

I . .- I . ; ~ , . A ~ - .,A,, ........ _I___._._&__._ LC:.:. :::'I ' :,';::.c: _ .___

I . .

Page 35: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- - . - . ?rcd.;c=s. 213 i n t e r L e ? e n d ? n c * :r.z;y a r r e c t t!,e nake-buy c h o i c e f o r a p r o d u c t 2: zts

1 2rcdcc : ion c o s t a t d c r . e s t i 2 ~ r l c e s ( i . e . , v h r n exdogencus i n t e r z e d i a t e i x p u z s r r e

I , - ~ a i ~ e d a: z a r g i n a l ; o s t s ) i s Less c i ao i;s i l p o r t ? r i c e v h i i e i t s h r p o r c p r i c e i s

, I

I l e s s t h a n i t s p r o d n c t i o n ~ c s t 2: xcr ld p r i c e s ( i . e . , -ken j n t e r r . ed a t e i n p u t s zre v a l x e c I a t i;r.?cr: p r i c e s ) . ( S e e t h e d i s c . - l s s i on i n t h e ? r e c e d i n g s e c t i c n . ) h;?ether o r r .cr s u c h 2 I -

produc: s h c u l d b e ? r o t u c e d d e p 5 r . d ~ upcn w h e t h e r i t s i n t e ~ ~ e d i a t e i . p u t s a r e p roduced c r i n o t , a i d t o i n d i c a t e c h i s w e will c a l l i t a " c r i t i c a l l y TO i n t e r d e p e n d e n t " ( C I i ) prodcc:. I

I - I n ? u t - o u ~ ? u t i n t e r d e p e n 2 e n c e i s q u i t e d i s t i n c t f r o n c a p a c i t y i t e r d e p e n 2 e c c e . S o u e v e r P I

I t h e < :oad l t i ons d e f i n i n g a C I I p r o d u c t depend upon x h e t h e r t h e r e i s apac i :? s h a r i c g .

I I

Witt o u t ca?ac i t ; r s h a r i z g , p r o d u c t i o n c v s t n u s t i n c l u d e a v e r a g e d i r e d t f i x e d c c s t s , s i n c e I

I t h e c e c e s s a r y c o n d i t i o n f o r ?rocuc: ion i s t h a t u n i t p r o d u c t i o n c o s t d e f i n e d t o i n c l u c e I

1 . - a v e r a g e u i r e c t f i x e d c o s t s and LO - ~ a l u e i ~ t e m e d i a t e i n p u t s a t t h e i r n i n i r u n zarg;:a~

c o s t s 5, lsss tilar? t h e ? r o d u : t l s I x p o r t ? r i c e . V i t h c a p a c i t y s h a r i n , on t h e o t t e r hrr.?.

u n i t ? r c d t c c i o n c o s t x o u i d e x c l u d e a v e r a g e d i r e c t f i x e d c o s t s , s i n c e t h e c e c e s s a r y I I

\ c o n d i t i o n i a r ~ r o d u c t i o n i s s i z p i : ~ t h a t :he p ~ c d u ~ t ' ~ z a r g i n a l prcdu i !

i n t e r e l i o t a ip.pucs a r s v a l u e d ac t h e i r n i n i x u x n a r g i n n l c o s t s , Se

p;;ce T ~ Y S i t i s p o s s < b l e chnt a p r o d u c t ~ o u l d b e b o t h c r i t i c a l l y i x t e r 6 e ; c r c e r :

1 and c r l t i - s l i - I() i r . terdependei . : a t t h e s a n e ti;le u n d e r c a ~ a c i t y

c o n f u s i o r ; t i l Z t c : ; is n i g i l t c a u s e , i;e s i ~ n l l lefine CII n r c d u c t s

s h a r i n g c a s e . T h ~ s , u s i n g t n e s > ~ b , o l s de£ i r . ed p r c r i . o u s l y , a C I I p r c u c t i s o7.e k c r - ~ i ; i c h 0 t -.

:.:ci + f *. \ J i and 2 :(c: a- f . i i

- Tte e f f e c t s of iO i n t e r a e ; c n d e n c c a r e t e s t ~ c n s u r c c by d i e s a s i g s l a t ! ! ~ z i i t i

E . . maie-buy . r i t e r i p : ] r a t h e r t ' 1;: ; !:o;i a~ -.:arlc! p r i ; c o , 3.i . Ifr,?;.-, ;>:c<:,.::I:'..: '. A & i I

Page 36: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

i ' . b e c ~ ~ s e I n t e r a e d i a t e 5 - p u t s ar? -:alced a t t h e l r n i x i a u n z a r g i n a l c a t 5 a s i ~ ? , ~ ~ r ? ; ;= z : i

. . ::arginal Cc.cr: : I cde l , r a t h e r :?a2 t5eir n a r g i n a l c o s t s d e t e r x i r e 3 b) t h e :,at:e->uy ::.c;:zs

p r ~ ~ d ~ ~ t s i g h t o p t i z a l l : ~ be i z s c r t c d . Sowever , 211 C I I p r o d c c t s s h u l i be ~ r o c u c 2 d ~ 5 t h

s h b r i n g uxde r t h e p a r a z e t e r s p e c i f i c a t i o n s cons id t ! r rd ? e r e . T!le c s t sax7ir,gs d u e t o t k e

. . , rez-;zcc. i;l t h e s o l u z i o n w i t h s h i i r i n g . ;.s b e f o r e , :Je u i i l n o r ~ a l i 1 e t h e c o s t sa\">fs

r e c o g n i t i o n of I@ i n t e r d e p e n b e z c e a s a p e r c e r . t of imporc c o s t is s cb~m f o r I rc ; lv idua1

p r a d u i t s i n F i g u r e 8; t h e s t r i p e d S a r s g i v e t h e s a v i n s s w i t h ~ a t s h r i n g , wh;le t h e solil I b a r s g i v e t h e a d d i t i o n a l s a v i z g s Cue t o c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g . F o r s p e c i f i c a t i o n ,

e s t ; - a c e by d i v i d i n g i t by L=porc z o s t .

j e p e n d i n g upcn -;:.lich o f i:s I n t e r x e d i a t s i n p u t s a r e o p t i n a l l y

2 G / '.-+'e a r e he.re o f c o u r s e a s s c x n g t h a t t h e g r o d u c t o u g h t t o be p odnced - a t '1 l e l ~ e l e q u a l t o x?, -~hl:h i s i n f a c t c o r r e c t f o r a l l C T I ~ r o d u c ~ s o v e r a l l ~ ~ e c i f i c a t i o i i s .

.L r

i z p o r t e a , a !:TI

The f o r n u l a g i v e n I n t h e 2 r eced i r . g s u b- s e c t i o n i s u s e d t o c c c p u t e t h e t o t n ; c o s t cf p r r ? d ~ c . : i . c f i ' u ~ d e r s i ~ a r i n g f o r i r . ? i . j l d ~ i : CTI sum~a t ! . on o v e r i h e s e t I,, i n rc:;lpucing t h e a d d 2 . t i o n a l fi:$ec! ~ ! i c s e ; o f non-CTI p r c c ~ z t s c p t i m n l l y prcducet l t ; i t ? ~ o ~ ~ t s h a r i r . ? . p r e v i o u s f o o t c o r e t h a t t h i s z c t h o d o f comput ing t I ~ c t o t a l c o s : s l l a r i n ~ f o r i . 9 i v f d ~ a . l j r - u u c i s c o u l d l e n d : o p r o b l a - s i n i s e v e r a l p r o d u 5 t s of c!ieir i n d i v i d u a l t o t a l c o s t s sf p r ~ d u c t i z : : I n c o r r c ; :I.: , s51tri t h e aggri. l ;ztt? 2 2 c t a f producir . ; r t1:er.: t o g e t S e r . ; ? r i s e i n ::eve*; c a s e s :;her; r:?s CCT rind C I I p r o d u c t s : "e re e a c h case t ! : ~ %L:.; 0 5 t5'; ;';:?I.:ld::al c s t i z a t c s c;r.;i~:-~:::i-e? :!lu ' L , c ! " i ~ s ( ? , Z C n'"j:-p '-'.: - . - - - ' 8 - * . - . . . . .

" ,z - b . L . i S L ~ l ' . .

- , 3 , . ,- .- ,. ., + -, . < . .

.Af:t,...=bc..L :>.~::ber ,t. ;td'+' . :;:: z!l,;ps .,,:as c:.;;~:.:..~: :, ~ ,,: '~ .ZC>'X,: rL.3,

;> :-, ,- , u r n ; , - ,. A - , ---. . : ,.., -- -., . v : ~ : . : i ~ C Z . J S ~ . : ~ C L ;; L . .:::;at.?: f r - r . rJc5 ; , . : . .~. . .. ,~ - ,,.. . .L.er~c! si.i;zL': . . a ~ i a:: . , . :cr<n% i:: iYi,;ur.=s -, d ~ ~ i . . l r ~ s . . . . .. L:,t? ,. ;)cr..:er,:a~e .:s5t s;..-;l.r.. ::owc-;cr, t!iis 7;;-. ( - : .!.:;-.>>.i::.. ~ 1 . 2

. . < ? q i ; - , z 7 l s f t j r ~ : - a : : . J ~ ~ L ! s ; *:- . :: ' ..~+. - .,. . - d L L a i.~~sLsCei-,: : : ,P :C>YY.;L- : . - , . .

t h e lowet- 2cund cr. ~ r c c i u c - s b y ~ - e ; ~ l n < . l n g

c c s ' t s w i t i ; su;:-xit.i;.n r,-,:+; .. . . . ,\,e c.~,.;t;:--;cc -.. - .. -. .

of p r c C u c c i o n ~ ; . i e ; . . . . i ! a; r::e C J L L ~ ~ :LC> c7,:c

. . . S O ~ 3 1 ; ; 2 ~ : t c _ ' ~ :x:;;it . . .- ~ ? , . i s > . - : ) c ~ F F : -

. . ccns:ierc:l :c!:ct':~jjr: I:. . . . . - - E.

a:;:li .;,-:2: : :.: * . .. <: . . ,. ., . - . . 5 , . ' 7 i <,_ ' . . . . '-- . : ' - r J .1

*,.. ... .:;, . ~ . - , - . - . L t.:.:, ::

:-.:,. , , . . , . _ , ,.... - . ; . i . ,. % . \ . . - . . , . > . . . ---,>*.. . -. .- . . ,., . . , , u . <?.>; .- t:,.:. : . c ,..; - ,:, . ..., c . :. :::..I. . L . L L 4 - .. ,:il;:-. .. .

-{I::::.,<:::,-,<- r ? -., &. : *. . ,i:; - : ~ . : L " ~ ~ ~ y ~ : sL- :]?p,:r::s;i :;>c :*; --:: .:;,. ; j:c,.: ? z > < ; < \. 7- ;:-;~-:: ,; :;t:v :-; ~ : ! e tct:: : f 76 c::: 3r.e ('11 ;;r83du:: i-s e ~ ~ c : u l ~ ~ L 3 y ~ ~ . . I ; , . 7 .. ,. - i - % 1. ::-?e - .~ : , :., . si .i z .. .,,('. - cnl;; c:ir(:c ~ i - ~ . > p s x p y . 2 ~ y . ~ : ( ? ~ - : c : d .

Page 37: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

t h s e x r e c r e d o u t p u r l e v e l , is 2153 S ~ C L T i n F i g u r e 8 , a l o n g w i t h t h e cur:~er o f C I i

p r o d u c t s , a s x e l i a s i n p a r t F . l 3f T a b l e 2 . I n a d d i t i o n , p a r t ~ . j of t h e t a b l e g b e s

t h e a g g r e g a t e c o s t s a v i n g s d12e t o t 5 e r e c o g n i t i m of I0 i n t e r d e p e 2 o v e r a l l t;:e CI;

p r o d u c t s as a p e r c e n t of t o t a l v a l u e added . E s t i ~ a t e s a r e shown unds r no-

I S h a r l n g and n i t h s h a r i n g .

F a r i n d i v i d u a l p r c d u c t s , :he c o s t s a v i n g s due t o t h e r e c o g n i t i n o f I0 i n t e r d e > e n d e n c s

c a n b e q u i t e l a r g e i n r e l a t i c n :o :he c o s t of i n p o r t i n g , p a r t i c u l a r l y when t h e s a v i c s s due

t o c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g i s i n c l u d e ? . The h i g h e s t s a v i n g s a p p e a r s i n t h 1 c a s e of c o n c r e t e I

I (i - 6 9 ) u n d e r s p e c i f i c a t i o n F3. I n t u r n , even when c a p a c i t y s h a r i i n c o r p o r a t e d , t?.e

c o s t s v a i n g s c a n b e q u i t e s m a l l . The l o w e s t s a v i n g i s l e s s t h a n on ~ e r - e n t of i s p o r t

c o s t , f o r rocn a i r c o n d i t i o n e r s ( i = 95) unde r t h e bas!?

I-. n i x e r s (i = 7 4 ) u n d e r s p e c i f i c a t i o n S1 ( s e e F i g u r e 8 ) ; of t h e t o t a l

40 .3 p e r c e n t i s t h e a d d i t i o n a l s a v i n g s due t o c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g . I f

n e g l e c t e d , t h e n t n e h i g h e s t savLngs i s o n l y 13.5 p e r c e n t , i n t h e c a s e

s a v i n g of <O.S p e r c e n r ,

c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g is

of b a l l - i l l s

I w e i g h t e d a v e r a g e s o v e r a l l t h e C I I ? r o d u c t s f o r p a r t i c u l a r s p e c i f i c a t i o n s . I0 i n t e r -

The r a n g e of c o s t s a v i n g s e s t i n a t e s i s s u b s t a n t i a l l y reduced

I dependence r e s u l t s i n a c o s t s a v l c g of a t most r o u g h l y 9.0 p e r c e n t o t b e zggregace i z p c r t

when one l o o k s a t

I c o s t of t h e CII p r c d u c t s under t~:o s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , z e r o unde r one s? c i f i c a t i o n , and

be tween 2 .0 and 5 .0 p e r c e n t i n t h e o t h e r s . E q u a l l y i n t e r e s t i n g i s t c c n p a r e t h e we ighred . t P i

I a v e r a g e e s t i m a t e s w i t h and 1 ~ i : h c u t c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g : ia g e n e r a l , v e r j l i t t l e of t k e

a g g r e g a t e g a i n due t o r e c o g n i z i n g TO i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e can b e a t t r i b u t d to c a p a c i t y h a r t n g . i

- . .

.* I n r e l a t i o n t o t h e suppl;: ccs: of t h e pPoduc t s a f f e c t e d ; t h e sa i n g s due t o tile - -

. . r e c o g n i t i o n of c a p a c i t y i n t e r c e p e z d e z c e i s g w e r a l i ; ~ g r e a t e r than ti1 t s t e ~ ~ i n g frc: t::e v m

r e c o g n i c i c n of I 0 i n t e r d e p e n d e r . c r ((:s;nzsre li.r,e.s 5 . 2 . 2 ' . i z-.:;d F. 1 .!: .

, . , , A c e y s 3 ' ' :::<>rc -:- -.- . appea rs L O s u g g ' s ; tkl.at r a p ~ c i t : ::;:~rdc.;.c.r.dc:;~:~ r:incrz: l.: "-..- L . . . l.. L ; l < S '

I . . I . . . . . . . . ~ n t ~ r L i ' ; : ; ) ~ n c i e - i . 2z l;ya-::a; i:.. ...:-:.:. =ee7,.&3 tt7 > < z- .. .$..-. .-- .. ,- .-. .+ T. ? . - L ,.---!.; - c . . . ~ - . . ~ - . ~ ~ . . ~ -.3..Q I . : :... L . - - , ..<. .. '.. .,. , .-. - . . .

! . - ... - . ,

,.'"., <;:-< 3 b LL .- .. . -" "'.' . . . - :?cros? z i l ti;e s::eci"ic:ir.::s :' , . . k , . , i L . . -.? ... ~r is . . . . . -. . . - . . . .. . - .

Page 38: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

. < . -.-, - s": .. * " . - . >. -L*cc : .< - - .- - . . , . '.c:: 1.- dLL -A&... 3 : : . 2 7 . , ::r c:.:?..:; -c: , : 2 1 :!L:? L ? tr1:: c-.L:::- :.I - I..; ::.-.-- ' - ; d . t ' * L

..,-,..- - - v- . . - - . -,

;=:.: L . , c s,;;,pl.: -2s: J: I:.= ~ z L ' ? . * L L ~ ~ 3~ <:it :..i;:,:; L,;~: ; > ~ : ~ l ~ ~ : ~ ;:: L L L Z ~ ;,::-::' I

. . . . . . , - - . - , . h rer-g-.z:zz 1i.e ; . g a i n f - :::?i

A z 1 ;:: .,,, P C 0..L.-- - - -

I -.- *.-

. . - -., -;>-e ?:;CUT,~ sf za?ac?.:: L : ; :e rc i~ ;c~dscce v o u l d I r i c r ~ a a c t h e zu?:~l-: co.. .: I:;? .

7rcLcz:s t h a t cught To b e produced by (zt ~ G S L ? 0.OS9 ? e r c e n t of ~dcei. 1: i

t pro2u; i *.hose u n i t ; r r?d i lc t ian 53st z t d o ~ e s t i c p r i c e s i s o n l y s l i g h l ly 3e lo r . its L F ~ ~ G ~ T

g e z e r z l , t h e n , I0 i z t e r d e p e n d e x e is of g r a t e r c o n s e q u e c c e :hat is

d e p e n l e z c e .

p r i z e S x t f e z v h i c h t h e a b s o l c t e c s s t s a v i n g s r e a l i z e d t h r o u g h done t i c p r o c n c t i c g i s 1

c z ? ~ c l : y inter-

L :;er:~ l a r g e due t o t h e 'nigh v ~ L u r ? e of de3and. C a p a c i t y i n t e r d e p e n d s c e , c n c:~e c i i e r h a n i .

I - s ~ t - c u t p u t iccerde?er .den;e o f z e n c r i t i c a l i y a f f 2 c t s t h e make buy choize cf z 1

I g e x e r a i l g a f f e c t s ~ a X s - b u y c::oices f o r p r o d u c t s h a v i n q vclcr:> of ie-aria,

vhLch i n ; l i e s a s n a l l absolute c o s t s a v i n g s b e t x e e n u n i t I

p r o d u c t i o n c o s t and i a p o r t p r i c e .

A S e n s i t i v i t - r A n a l y s i s of - -. ,?E e s t i n a t e s d e v e l o 7 e d and b r i e f l y s u x ~ a r i z e d i c t h e tTh70 p r c c d i n g s u b - s e c t i s n s I can b e u s e d t o i n q u i r e f u r t 5 e r i x t o t h e d e t e r m i n a n t s of t h e c c n z e n u . n c e r ; of in t~~rd- . ; - . : :L~:- .~ . .

ZJ:, b e f o r e t , r n i n g t o a n e x ~ z i n a t j o r . of t h e e f f e c t s of p a r a z e c e r :l.arlges or! t?,e cob:

C I ' . e . - , 5':vings d::e t o t h e r e c z J g a i t : ~ n l ~ f e i t h e r o r b o t h iypes of i .~erle;?r : . .dsncc, ,;e . : :::

I

1 t u ccn,dllct . ,. a n a l y s i t h e cezsurc o i

. . . depcrrdence Ce7,,p! oped ; ~ r e v i c i : - :;. . ::ul:!i o f what cirri je 1c;lrncd deriv;fs f yc ; , ,:.-,a .,-.- -.- . . . . . . A . a , . i :; i 5

Page 39: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

2nd ic ~ ~ 1 1 d e c l i n e as t k z -,+-age r a z e c r tF.2 i n t e r e s : r a t e r i s e s . Indeed , excepc f o r :he

~ f f e c r s f del-,and, t h i s c a n be s e e n 3:: canpar ing the n a r g i n a l c c s t mqasur2 of I0 i n t d r -

dependence a c r o s s s p e c i f i c a t i m s . The t a b l e below ~ o k e s t h i s conpad i son i n t e n s of

s i z p l e a v e r a g e s over che 120 ~ r 3 l u c : i o n a c t i v i t i e s '

Y a r g i n a l C c s t Xeasure of I 0 I n t e r d s p e n d e n c e I ( u n i t s = p e r c e n t )

Exchange ?.ate V a r i a t i o n - F3 Average 7.53 S t a n d a r d D e v i a t i c n 8.15

Wage R a t e V h r i a t i c n Average L tandard D e v i a t i o n

B a s i c 5.16

I n t e r e s : R a t e V a r i a t i c n K 1 Average 5 3 4 S t a n d a r d D e v i a t i o n 5 .88

Lie 32); z g a i n u s e t h e t - s t a t i s t i c t o e v a l u a t e t h e s i g n i f i c a n c e of t h e ,ean d i f f e r e n c e s I

by n change i n t h e f o r e i g n exchange r a t e ; the r e sponse i s somewhat l e s s i g n i f i c s n t t s a

change ir. t he wage r a t e , and i c i s l e a s t t o a change i n t h e i n t e r e s t

between p a i r s . The t - s t a c i s : i c h e m e e n t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n s i n the exchange

is 7 . 5 9 ; i n the ~ 2 g e r a t e variation, 5 .79 ; and, i n t h e i n t e r e s t r a t e

f i r s t two of t h e s e a r e h i g h l y significant, u h i l e t h e l a t t e r i s s i g n i f i c a n t

I f o r a o n e- t a i l e d t e s t . Thus t h e d e g r e e o f i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e i s most

I t is no t s u r p r i s i n g t h a t a change i n t h e f

! impac t , f o r i t produces a d i r e r : a n d p r c p o r t i o n a I I

r a t e v a r i a t i o n

- ~ a r i z t i o n , 1.38. The

a t t h e .10 l e v e l

s i ~ n i f t c a n t l y a f f e c t e d

i of i n t e r i r e d i a t e i n p u t c c s t s v n l c e c a t wor ld p r i c e s . I n t u r n , an e x p l a n a t i o n of t h e

found i n t h e cornposi t ion of ::argir.ol c s s : dorestii p r t c e s . c>n ; Iver- igcy :abcr ) s ~ . I I I , difference i n t h e z a g n i t u d e o f E?!P respor.se t o c h n i i g e s i n t h e wage 2nd 1 - i n ~ e r c s t r z t c s I s

Page 40: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

? - x r - ~ e r - ~ -52 e z r i = c t s ,I ; s r r ; r d = c r c: : ;c2.>s - 2 ; th7 .22 Le.t...-- r -. .

- - - a -:-F::.< 5 : - ::.:;: t.i:12 c. -<?. , : .-

, . -.. .- ~ - ' ,;;..:!.?I- :!le _:?A,.- .~~;: c:;~:~:= f o r 2 ;a::;~.=,.:1:: - , . rcn , ;z i i.,;

1. . - i:?:erdz?er.L2n:es i n e rake-b:,::; c h o i c e f-?r a ?;TC::XLJ:-

. . fc;r c:sti:ct ?>.bses 2s 6 p a r t l : z ? z r ?e raxe te r is ;a i:--

a r o d c c E i c c ~ c ~ s t s ' r e l a t i v e t o i a 2 o r t p r i c e s : i n c:-.e

<"ice i s ~ c t z r i t i c a l l y a f f 2 c t e d by

- - . - secozd and t h i r d p h a s e s , t h e - , roCucc ' s rilke-bc:= c h o i c e i s e z z e c c ~ s 2:; i:..,

d e p e n d e x e a c d i t s h o u l d 5 e i s ~ o r t l e d I n :he s e z c ; ~ d and t:-.ird; i n t?,.~

f o u r t h p h a s e , ;he p r c d u c t ' s x k e - b u g c h o i c e i s agc?in n o t c r i i c a i l ; , a f f e c t ~ 6 'zv i - - - j - . . L C

l e p e n d e n c e , b u t i t s h c u l c b e p roduced . I -. ~ n e se-cnd q u e s t i o n h a s t o do w i t h t h e c o n s e ? u e c c e s of ? I n t e r d a p 2 r . d e r r i re;-

I

t o a s i n g l e p r o d u c t which i s c r i t i c a l l y a f f e c t e d by in t e rde5c r .dence a n 2 s r .gh t E D 52 I produced . S i n c e t h e consequences of i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e s r e nea u r e d by he d i f f e r , n c z

be tween p r c d u c t i o n c o s t and i m p o r t p r i c e , t h e y w i l l va,? w i t p a r a n e t e r changes i n t:

sarie d i r e c t i o n a s d c z s t h e a e a s u r e of I0 I n t e r d e p e n d e n c e . F r r h e n o r e , c h i s i s r r u ~ Ij whe::ter one i s s p e c i f i c a l l y conce rned v i t h t h e consequer .ces cf I0 i n t c r d e ~ e ~ . 2 e n c e OL-

o f c a ? > i c i t y i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e . Wi:h r e g a r d t o a s l n g l e p r c d w c t , a r i s e i- t':e ;:cc?sn$

r a t e zakes. i t n o r e c c s t l y t o n e g l e c t i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e ~ h l : ~ - z n i n c r e a s e ir. * ~ c : : e r r k e

r4 t t . , or =he i n t e r e s t r a t e nakeg i t l e s s c o s t l y . ';:len a! i o t h e r ; ~ r o d u ~ t s ' i ' ~ t ; ) x t L.zv

a re t:nchnnqed, t h e c c n s c q t ~ e n c c s of e i t ! l e r t y p e of i n t e r d c ? e n d o n c e genera;?:: : n c r c , . s e

a r i s e i r ? ie::nnd f o r the p r c d c c r s i n c e r?verage Air&?(.!: '%xed c o s t s n , enpra ' i : : , i l l A;;

P .

I i n c r e a s e i:, : . ! I ii ti; t:e : ~ e t til:cugh i l c i i s z i : pr52e::.io;t 1

I

Page 41: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

c o n s e q u e 3 c e s of i n t e r d e ~ e n d e n c z v:r:: n o n o t ~ n i c a l l y w i t h changes i n a p a r t i c u l a r ?araF.e=er,

b e i n g i r , c r e a s e d vhex t h e pars l r .e te r change r e s u i t s i n a r e d u c t i o n of d o n e s t i c ?reduction

c o s t s r e l a t i v z t o i n p o r t p r i c e s and reduced i n t h e o ? ? o s i t e Ho;~ever , tilis r.eecj

n o t b e t h e c a s e b e c h u s e p a r a s c t e r changes a l s o i n f l u e n c e u c t s a r e c r i t i c a l i v

a f f e c t e d b y i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e . I n a d d i t i o n , by a f f e c t i n g t h e compos t i o n a n d / o r c a p a c i t y 't e c t i l i z a t i o r , of t h e s e t of p r o d u c t s ::hich s h o u l d be p roduced i r r e s p c t i v e of i n t e r -

d e p e n d e n c i a s , p a r a n e t e r changes a l s o a f f e c t t h e magn i tude o f t h e g i n s due t o c a p a c i t y

s h a r i n g . Thus t h e s e c t o r- w i d e consequences of i n t e r d e p e n d e n r ? n z e

a o n o t ~ r ~ i c a l l y t o p a r t i c u l a r p a r a m e t e r changes . And t h i s i s t r u e w e t h e r t h e s e 4 c o c s e q c e n c e s are a e a s u r e d i n a b s o l u t e terms o r r e l a t i v e t o t h e s u p l y c c ; t of t h e

c r i t i c a l l y a f f e c t e d p r o d u c t s t h a t s h o u l d b e produced o r t o t o t a l v

The r e s p o n s e o f t h e consequences of i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e t o c h a n g e s i n s e c t o r- w i d e

demand p r o v i d e s t h e c l e a r e s c examples t o i l l u s t r a t e t h e f o r e g o i n g a a l y c i s . D i e s e l b e n g i n e s of 200 t o 500 horsepower ( i - 51) a r e c r i t i c a l l y I0 i n t e r d e e n d e n t unde r t h e S l , b b a s i c , a n d 5 3 s p e c i f i c a t i o n s ; i n c l u d i n g t h e a d d i t i o n a l s a v i n g s due t c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g ,

t h e c o s t s a v i n g s due t o p r o d u c i n g t h e s e d i e s e l e n g i n e s i s 3 . 4 4 , 3 . 6 , and 3.S0 p e r c e n t

of t h e i r i m p o r t c o s t unde r each of t h e s p e c i f i c a t i o n s r e s p e c t i v e l y s e e F i g u r e 9 ) . These k e s t i m a t e s i l l u s t r a t e t h e monotonic i n c r e a s e i n t h e consequences of n terdepender lce a t

t h e l e v e l of a s i n g l e p r o d u c t a s domes t i c p r o d u c t i o n c o s t f a l l s r e 1 t i v e t o t h e c o s t of

i m p o r t s ; :?is i s :he p r c l c t i c a l l y un,exceptiona! r e s p o n s e w i t h , r e spec t o e i t h e r t y p e I o f i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e where c * ~ r d a t a p e n n i t compar i sons a c r o s s s p e c i f i a t i o n s , r e g a r d l e s s 4 of t h e ; a r t i c u l a r p 3 g a n c t e r ttlar: is v a r i e d . An e x c e p t i o n (one of o r l y two t h r o u g h o u t

-* t h e s p e c i f i c a t i o n s ) ? s p r o v i d e d by b a l l mi l ls (i = 69) which a r e c r ' t i c a l l y c a p a c i t g - - - i n t e r d e p e n d e n t u n d e r x h e S 1 and b a s i c s p e c i f i c n e i o n s and c r i t i c a l l y I0 i n t e r d e p r n b ~ n t I .

I

u n d e r t h e S 3 s p e c i f i c ; l t i o r i . The c o s t s a v i n g s ice t o ?reducing ball -:ills i s 3 . 5 0 , !G.i5,

. +

I S:c and i 5 . 1 3 p c r c e i ~ e zf i z p o r t c c c t L ~ I , C ~ C T t d i i i CI t ! ;cse s ? c c ~ f i i ~ L > c ~ ; ~ Iro~;xc~c:l..3c::7 '

. . . F i g u r p s 1 and S), s o ':h,.it ~ i ~ o ;;cns.cjue;:c:is 0 5 . < r : : . ~ y ~ p ? e ~ ; d ~ ~ : i i . in

r a t h e r :L>,:r r i s e v+-i;pr, +!.n -n.>-~.,--, , .

L.,,L , . .L . . . i J . , : ~ :x c ~ ~ ~ . y ~ ! : ;~ey : ! .~ : : : . c . c : :s <:,>G:!:L.~

I .-. 7

I l ! le cai!sfd i:; 2. f i , l L , ; 2 , ; ) :tie :.;>?.a? ' . .

.-?h-,.(7 rz:!, .:I-):- ,::..*>;;<:5.Ly :::;Lir::;z.

Page 42: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

I . . . I . - ,- CiL ;rzducts, t h e n v - ~ k e r o f v i c h :>sn-~s ~;C!ll-~inotC!.7.;.;cJi~-: '.;It? l::.re&sc:? '- .- . - ' - - - . - . . .- - . . . , . -. ~ . , . , r - - -> , .rLL a r ? 2 CIL ? r c c u c : ~ unde r ~ p e c i f l c a t i o r ~ S i , 4 ~ r 2 e r r'::e j a s f - ~ r , e c ; i : c ~ : i ~ ~ , . L - - . - - .

3 =ricer s ; : e c i f i c a z i ? n S 3 ( see F i g c r e 3 ) . X o n e t h e l e s s , o n l t t i n g ..2 a c l i t i c n a l 2iF.1 ;::Y lL - -Gpa:ity shar- ,ng, t:;e lcss t h a t would be i n ~ a r r e d L-re zhsse p r o k c c t l ~ . p . ; r ~ ; d Escs

i n c r e a s e 1 ~ i t ; l ds;r.arid: i n r c i 2 t i o ; i EC t h e i r aggrega te i!;pcrt c o s t 4 t k e Loss is 3 .1 , 3 . 5 .

3 . 9 percent r e s ? e c t i - ~ e l y under t h e S 1 , b a s i c , znd 5 3 s p e c i f i c a ~ i n s ; ;n r 2 i a t i c n :(: i a g g r e p i t e v a l u e a l l e c , t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g fLgures a r e . 6 7 i , .732 , arc2 ,821 p e r c c n t

r e s p a c t i v e l : ? . (These and t h e e s E i c a ~ e s g i v e n below a r e taken fr x T a b l e 2 , ) ? o . i ~ v e r , r i f tiye a d d i t i o n a l g a i n f r o n c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g i s i n c l y ~ c e d , :he? t t ; c - l o s s c h a n g s s nor.- 1 a u n o t c n i c n l l y ? ~ i t S i n c r e a s e s i n denand : i n r e l a t i o n t o t h e i r agg egdLe i ~ p o r ~ c c s t ,

t h e t o t a l 135s i s 3 . ? , 3 . 6 , and 4 . 1 p e r c e n t r e s p e c t i v e l y ; i~ r e 1 t i o n t o t o t a l v a l u e i a d d e d , t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g f i g u r e s a r e 0 . 7 7 5 , 0.756,and 0.860 p e r c d n t .

l Tur2 ing t o t h e C C I p r o d u c t s , we fLnd t h a t t h e i n p a c t of d e a nd c h a n g e s on t h e s e : t c i

wide consequences of c a p a c i t y interdependence i s just :he o p p o s i i e of t h a t on ti:c s r c :u r .

v i d e c o n s e q u e n c e s of I C i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e . Tliat i s , An i n c r e a s e i{ d r z a r d r a a - . - ~ - -ic3 th.2 :CS

i n c u r r e d by i ~ y s r t i z ; ; Chc CCI p r o d u c t s which o u g h t te be produced i s 1 7 . 7 , !3.7: a x - - z e r 3 p e r c c n : r e s 2 e c t i v e l y of ::?cse ; r o d u c t d zggrcE;a tc inpcrr c o s ~ c u:;Jor t?:e C : , '3;151c,

L I I

a:ld S 3 S F e c i f i c s t i o n s ; t h e c o r r e s p c z c i i n g f @ u r e s i x r e l a t i z n :C ~13:21 v . i lx t : aci-eci :i::i.

e I 13. 265, 0 , 0 8 9 , end z e r o ?er r i . : i t r e , ~ ~ e c t i - ~ e ? l ; . T1-e r?;?.;~:: f 3 r ii,e i:: T L C ~ . : . I C ~

as 5e t-zecr: ri:t s e t :,-.r-.~ii.e ~ , . ; S ? ~ U E T . C ~ : ~ ', r.ap.lc<try I:.- : - . : 1,- z C . . 7. 5 : ; . ..: :- . . I

is f.n:lj ::: : : , , . $ 2 &:.:i<l! ye=:: : , ' : i 1:. ;/:::. . - . . . ' . . " C -'... ' ' ~ . . . . . L ~ ? : 3 -

Page 43: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- -.2 -

t h a t t he sectsr-vi ide cocse:Lences of i r i t e rdspen lence need no t vary u n i i o r x i i y l.,~iti-~

changes i n the k e y ?arazc.:ers, :..l?ereas :he cor~sequences f o r s i n g l e ?ro<uc ts geze r z l l - r I

d o . We cou-J g s cn t o f u r c k e r i l l g s r r a t e t h i s p o i x t wi th r e s p & c t t o v a r i a t i o n s iz I

the o t h e r p a r a e t a r s . Esz2ver, .<e s h a l l l e a v e t h i s f o r t h e r e i d e r t o pursue if s o I

Page 44: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

. . ? . I -L-2,: ?,.*.:..< ? = .,.- she-*-: c i . ~ t ~ ig : :~ : : z~r . c ec,~r.c,zL,is , f :::;+ z r - ;j-esc:.~ :.-: z>e z r > : : l - r 2 _..L _ . _ _ __._ . - -

. . - - . . l o d e l e d z rd t h a t t h e r e i s 2 acre . , :s;: G: p;.ti .nrla: in:eric.?ez<?r.c:?

who le . On t h e o t > . e r hanr',, Scc t io r .

F i r s t , t h e n u z b e r 05 p r o d u c t s a i f s c t e l i iy i a r e r d e p e r d o n c e i s d a i e r p ' l l ? : l i re 5:rall ~3:;:: ;

- i. :o :he n u a b e r of p r ~ d x c : s :h2: s a t i s f y t 5 e z e c e s s a r y c o n d i c i o z 13r r c i u e t i o z . 5ac~:.c,

t i e 20s t 3f n e g l e c t i n g i n t e r d e p e n l e n c e , w h i l e s o e e t i z e s su5s t a x i l a l , --, :- Zei-s n f t h e

? r o d u c t ' s orm s u p p l y c o s t , i s g e r e r a l y v e r y s~.:.ali r e l a t i v e :o t ~ t z l adddd L ~ - : T ' - -..-.. zkr:

s e c c o r . I n no c a s e v o u l d t h e c o n ? l e t e n e g l e c t or' i n t e r i e p e n d e z c e c h c o s i n ~ b e t ~ e ~ r ,

p r ~ d u c t i o n and i n p o r z s i n c r e a s e s e c t o r - : ~ % d e t o t 2 1 s u p p i y c o s t b:; e :ban 3 .0 ;erz:rt s:

t o t a l v a l u e added . Tc! p l a c e t h i s e s t i r : a t e i n p e r s p e c t i v e , L t -. ; : e a l :,-;thix :'st. rar.c,e of :- t

e m p i r i c a l e s c l n a t e s f o r t h e e f i i c i e x c y l o s s Ooa t o t h e c!e~-i:ore frbn P z i 2 t e c p t i z n l l r .

:a!? be c r a c e d t o t z r i f f s , t a x e s , xonopo iy , and tk.e l i l i ? ix t h e sbs? ce of ec2r.-- 'es cf 2 2 2 t. . - ,,e a r e t h u s l e d t o c o n c l u d e t h a t rhe i n t e r d e p e x d e x e co v h i c h i e s of s c a l e g l v e r i s e

d c e s n ' t "nat:er: ' v e r y much.

O f c o u r s e , a c o n c l u s i o n drak-n f r cm the e s t i a a t e s p r e s e n t e d i n e c c i c n liI r . uc t Se

: e n t a t i - ~ e , and i s b e s t r e g a r d e d a s a n h y p o t h e s i s s u b j e c t t o f u r c h e r ies: i : i~ r,r.r', rcf::.ez.ent

w i t 5 c t h e r , n i a i l a r S o d i e s o f p r a d u c t i c n i n f o r x a t i o n zsr c z h e r coun r L e s 2nd scc tc rs .

. , . -.:e ?;;i;-c VC\,.<EL :.:- :' T h e r e a r e s e . ~ e r a l r e a s c c s f o r c h i s . F i r s t , t h e " ~ 2 ~ 3 l e s i ze"

o n l y one s e t of u s d e r l y i n g p r ~ d a c t i , c n d a t a and x i t n %?n',y r ~ i - c se t ; f ;;ra;r.cte

. I . . s p e c i f i c a t i c n s . Second, a l l o w a n c e n u s t be n a d c f o r ;cssiL:c errors o f 2 5 k n ~ ~ ~ n c ~ r ~ ~ p ; -,cn

- - . _ .I 29,' C : l r sc~j:;t:.or. ;.ro:edcre - . - . - . , . . , , . - , . , .. .. . - .

- I n e r r e :: lez,.is .JS !I(: 2.c : . L . _ ... . . . . . . . .. .: . < . L & . :..-., . . 1 .

!:.:fr.r,:i:r_r?decrc. .-,-r~..b,ez,zr~.. . c h p fz i ; :yyc :- :;.& ;ri ,I..;;..a.,- ,..-I t c I : - . . . . .-.. . - i;: '.:: r:. - ..--:-:.:: . . . - . > f - ; -. ,

1 ; L 5 . = . [ ! : - , - . - : - : Y . . .-..: <- .- ' . -- .. . . ' . ?, . . -. ,- 0 7- . . - ,. . ..L -,. ;.f SCT -;.r-,c!:~ct:s .-.::2 : , i q ; r :a tc:l :r.c .?; t L . %.. . . .

Page 45: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

a r e c o n s i s t e n t v i t h t h e n e z r l y u r . i ve r sa1 f i r -d i n g t 5 a t t h e s u r f a c e of t h e c b j e c t i v e fxcctls

i n a n i n c r e a s i n g r e t u r n s ~ o d e l i s c u i t ~ f l a r o v e r a r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e n e i g h j o r h c o 5 of E ~ S

g l o b a l o p t i x u r ~ . z/ F i n a l l y , t h e x c d e l o x i t s s e v e r a l f e a t u r e s whiqh have been ky;oc>.ssiz:.~ I

t o i n c r e a s e t h e consequences of i ~ c e r d e p e n d s n c e : =/ t h e model i s s t a t i c r a t h e r t h a n I d y n z i c ; i t n e g l e c t s s p a t i a l allocation and t r a n s p o r t c o s t s ; and , irt does n o t incor?ora:e

I -

There a p p e a r s t o be a q u i t e s ic rp le e x p l a n a t i o n f o r o u r which we F;elLZv= -

s u b s t i t u t i o n ariong p r o d u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s , e i t h e r i n t h e p r o d u c t i o n

o r chrough r e s o u r c e b u d g e t c o n s t r a i n t s .

n a k e s i t n o r e p l a u s i b l e . The consequences of i n t e r d e p e a d e n c e a r e a f u n c t i o n of t h e n c x t e r

of i n d i v i d u a l p r o d u c t s

of c r i t i c a l l y i n t e r d e ~ e n d e n t p r o d u c t s and , f o r e a c h cf t h e s e t h a t o g h t t o 11e ?reduced, t k ~ C c o s t s a v i n g s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h rhe r e c o g n i t i o n of i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e . ~ { e s e c t o r - v i d e

I

consequences of i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e i n t h e Korea4 model a r e i n i n i a a l l a r e l y because 0:: t h t 4 m a l l nunber of c r i t i c a l l y i n t e r d e p e n d e n t p r o d u c t s . R e c a l l t h a t a r o d u c t i s cr2t l :al l : : 4 i n t e r d e p e n d e n t i f i t s i m p o r t p r i c e l i e s be tween i t s a v e r i g d p roduc tdon c o s t a t wor ld p r i c e 3

Wi > c On 2 p r i o r ; and i t s z i n i n u n m a r g i n a l p r o d u c t i o n c o s t , i . e . i f >ICY + f i - - g r o u n d s , t h e r e i s no more r e a s o n t o e x p e c t a l a r g e nunber of s u c h p r d u c t s w i t h i n a s e c t o r b t h a n t h e r e i s t o e x p e c t a s m a i l number; i f a n y t h i n g , a m a l l nunber o u l d g e n e r a l l y be

expected. F i g u r e 9 g i v e s . t h e cumula t i \ re f r equency d i s t r i b u t i o n of t e r a t i o s of average?

p r o d u c r i o n c o s t a t t h e e x p e c t e d o u t p u ~ l e v e l s t o i n p o r t p r i c e ( i . e . , Ci/K.) i n t h e b a s i c ? s p e c i f i c a t i o n of t h e Korean model. The d i s t r i b u t i o n of a v e r a g e prod c t i o n c o s t t o i n p o r t ,

. I

p r i c e r a t i o s i s w i d e l y d i s p e r s e d ; 98 p r o d u c t s have r a t i o s between .1 and 1 .70, rci t ! l a r r o u g h l y u n i f o r m d i s t r i b u t i o n o v e r t h i s i c t e r v a l . Hore t o t h e p o i n t , o n l y a r e l a t i - ~ e i y f~7:; - 'I - - p r o d u c t s have r a t i o s c l o s e t o i . 0 , and t h e s e a r e t h e p r o d u c t s ~ o s t b e crl:;:s--:: -

i n t e r k p e n d e n t . G/ The e?c;rlanation is tb.us fcund i n t h e v i d e I

30/ S e e , f o r exampie , :!snne : 1 9 6 7 ) , p . i 5 f f . and :;ss:~i~al - ? l / See :!anne ( 1 9 7 3 ) and :.;es:?!?ai ( i 5 7 5 ) .

I I -- I

. . 32,' A t :his point; i t i s rele\;an'; to r ,cte : i 1 - ; ~ ::'Ji\_ : . : cZ? C ' G ~ C ~ G : ~ . ; - : c Y - - . . . t h e i 2 0 p rcduc ts . T h e !~;:..est c:>rrsizt lcr , is :cur,d .:;C; : :;.;c. :s::..: ::. 2

c o r r e i a t i o n i s i 9 3 6 , while t h e raak c o r r e l a t i c n i s . 9 7 2 .

Page 46: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

.- -< , - -..c7 - . .. ,- . , - ,. ;-,, . ,_ ,:ect - a p ? r a i s e l cri tert-7. f c r ~ r c d c c 1 5 3 1 states t h a t a ? r o c : ,:c c!:z::::. . - - \ - . - : -

-

. I - ., - c s 2: ; ;or lc ~ r i c c s der i - jes f r r , tr,e 7 c r f e c t l y c z ~ y e r i : ' c . ~ . - -2:e wl::n :;o:.-Lx:-e~z:n:

rs:;rns to s c a l p zr.2 f r e e inter ; ls :Far .al t r z d e . L'zi'er t h i s :;rd&, - ~ - ~ o i l i ~ t , - ~ L-.~,:;. ..- - tntc-.- - - -

- . . s 3: :*.s Le:.ci,-pz.t:n: 7 . : ; * r % 3 - . . a o r . T h e r e is a x p l c . . . . . ,. . . . ,

, . - - . zc: ::.ec::ar.~ca- ,~2gi :< :e r ing ? . r s d l ~ c t s a cour1cr;l ~ u s " ~ s ; r s t

J ,- ,. ' . . . . -A,, iL<,L:;.); :-52 : l : f i + , , i S t ~ : ~ y , : , i g : < : - ! - : l j . 2 P".?

- . 3 - ; 1 - . , , - 7 . ~ --<.A ....- ,-.- iin ~ c ~ c i u ; r . : ~ - ::;isc? .:5 ..- . . - - -. , . . I ,. - , -5 -,??or r s r i c y C 0 5 i o l i t i ~ p l l ~ 5 i ! 1 ~ 5 S?.CU?I 9 ~ t 5.2 ~ a l y j x 2.5 2 <.:-.:::- ?:,

C . r

I T o c r g i : ! u < z i : \:?.,i;e i::cy:l:;.ci;dcnce da($ t-2 r+.-<-r. . - -

. I

3 , -- ,- ..u,.:l.c.s (.I +,(.a,~? ~:t.::s L C ~ : ; : , ~ L : C Y 5:- I - . .-

Page 47: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 48: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 49: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 50: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 51: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 52: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

Coat Saving Resulting from Capacity Sharing

Cumulal~ve

Fpmuencv: Number ol Process Elements

0 20 4 0 60 80 (00 ' Percenregd at C o y Seved under C a ~ d f % t y S h s r ~ n q

I

I World bnk-9912

1

.-

Page 53: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 54: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

T o d Cmt S r r i n ~ k 1rnpa-t C a t for Gibdlv to I n a d . p r d . R t Roductr

Page 55: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 56: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 57: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

?. k n l u - & r r c Lrw.1 L* 7 ~ ' 0 . 3 d + >. r . ~ h . ~ ~ . 1 . c . (von per U.I. dal :*r ) ~------I50----$ $50 300 4 3, I rmrrb . b u r l , Gag. b e (wnn) t 15; > I , . ~.t.r..r r.cr c p . r = . o c ) L I e--- 20

K* + - >O ----------4 215 3 73 t i ?5 ------t

1 3 >D

I - I ' . I. g 4 . r o f r r o d u c t l o n A c r l r l t l ~ ' :

1. Ior w i ~ i c h rC 5 2 ' Y 58 >S 5 1 , 72 ( 6 1 2, l a cb* S o l u r i o n r i C l w t S l a r l r B :

2 1 6 9 I. rrodurrd r r ? r % L = u D ~ t p u t Ltrrl >9 6 0 & 9 66 62 6 9 6 1 5 2 b. Impor ted . o r l o p o r t e d r s d Produc.6 I I I

I, troduc-4 v l t h S h r i n g . . 61 61 57 6 7 & 6 5 3 5 3

:. * o c a ~ v. ~ u c ~ ~ 8 . 4 <-!l!ion ran$' - . I . ~ l c b v l Shoring 81516.7 1 6 S . 7 9?215.1 42517.6 9 0 . I . 71117.6 1 9;112.'1 1. w i t h Sharing W731.8 1b017t.: - 5 . e 3 ; c i . r 606oL.7 7 . 101-I:.$ 76175.1 i E;i;6.:

>. roinc Lrl lz - l r . a 1 C t c t o r - v { d e V a l r a Led14 S c a l e : I r a : l r l r *

1. F l t h o ~ r S h r l n g 0.661 0 . ~ 6 1 5 .115 0 . 7 0.802 1.872 3 . 6 7 1 I O.E:5 1 0.5% 2. Y l t h S h r l r g 0 . W 0.905 C . j i 3 ' 0.891 O.SL3 , 1.901 0 ' 0.WZ . ( 1 . 8 3 j

. Cosr Zavl: ,rr d u e . .I.pbtltv S ? a L n $

1. D l a r r r d u c t s ? r a d . ~ ~ t J ~ 1 t . L S : Y ~ ~ ~ : ' a . Saving. i n F ixed Cost /p . r r tnc l . lL.B ' 20.1 ' 12.L 16.6 22.9 :&.I lL.7 27.C 11.2 b, Savlnsa i n ' l * ! c . ~C2.d r:mrr.nc) .. 3.1 1.L 3.8 4.1 1.1 3.2 1 . 2

2 . W e r F r o d u c : ~ tk.nr a r e C r l t ~ r . 1 : ~ C a p a c i t y :?rr:!c:e:t.?t a. Shauld t. 7roddc.d r i r l l i t a r l c ~ : i o l a l CaaI i r v ~ = ( s

I . Ar r*rren: of t ~ 3 I : ? ~ r c ' < o s ~ L , 13.7 0.0 1 5 . 1 . 26.7 11.0 10. 2 11. A s P e r t e c c of Icc.1 :.lie ~ d 4 . d - .0.069 . I 1 9

b. Should ::or tr Pra3:c.a v::h Skar lng: I o t a ! C a a : !rcrersm i . A s I.r<.ar of h. I=-orc Co.: 61.6 0.7 6.7 . A.6 6.5 5 . 1 I..> l . 1 : c . ?

' 1 1 . A. ?.rc.nc o f I~: . I i . : ~ t A d d . d i l 0.011 0 . 0 ~ 5 I 0 . i c 9 0.0'6 0.0:s c.::: 0.01: I C . k 2

. Frat 5,v!ng&q I > 7ccos?1:L? o f ! O i,:rrtr~r-ts:rr

1. A r ? c r c c n t o f AT l c p ~ r c Core . .. L' t rhrur Sh. r l , ( 3.5 3.9 . 3 . : . ' 8 . 3 1.0 0.0 i . 7 2.1 C.i

b . u l t h S D s r t ~ c b I , .

1.6 c-1 ~ J.5 7 ' 1.1 0 . 0 2. ' ( . I , r . A,- P*.?:*.*t of : r t , t .:a Sde A&,td -

a . Y l t h o u c S h a r l n ~ 0.712 0.171 1.:?1 2.757 0.115 0 .3 b. P!ch PharL~.& 0.756 0 . 4 5 0 , . 1.$10 0.116 3 .0

Page 58: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

I

TO ~ o t i - ~ a t e t k e f o l l s v i n g d i s c u s s - L A C , ce s h a l l EL::? t C G C 5 r < r : r 1 a ? a r t i c n l a :

f o m of t k e !.iIT r o l c l . Suppose =b.zt t::sre vr:e TAG ca>;cily :~c'-ricig ( I e , f o r wc?,

k~ 3ki > '? Ear o d j r a s i c g l e i ) a d :hzt t h e r e vtre no er.6?&en.cs 5 t t e r r . r - ? f ? t e I

i c p t c o s r ( i e , Aij = 0.0 , all i ztd j ) . ?'be f u l i ~ o d e l slculd t k e b k c 4ec~--?o,ccblc I

F 2 t o a set o f models, a c e f o r ecch p r o d u c t , of :he Zoi lcwing f c r z : ~

. I where R d e n c t e s t h e s e t of p r o c e s s e l e n e r t s !n which ~ r c c e s s i n g ils r e q u i r e d r o

i

prcduce product i . This i s .I very si:pla earif1 t o s o l v e . iJse eccdt- icn 1 2 ) to I

s u b s ~ i t u t e i n t o t h e objrcr:ve f c n c r i o n F o r yi; (31, fcr c , ; and, !b), f o r 2,. . 7Yi.e A K

I ' .

o b j ec t i v c f u n q t i o n t h e n becones : i I r

. . I

I .I I - I

- l a s t t c r n on t h e r l g h c $3 a cons tanc tern e q u a l :o ;kc ccsr a f i m p 8 r t i r . g a:: * I

I t h a t i s exoeenor!sly derranded: it m2.y be ~ e g l e c t e d . 3 e r.Fra {I; pkr:inck:escs t h a t

I

c u l t - l p l i e s x; i s t h e ~ a r g i n a ; s a v i n g s of c i c ~ e s t i c prcl1:cticn cver I:r.yc.r: c o s t : *

i s the u n i t i r . ao r t c ~ s t anti Gi i s t b ~ - - r ~ i 2 a l 6:csc of t:.-,cc?.stlc i

. . 2 y p r o d u c t i o n . Let I!S d e n o t e u n i t marg1z;il s a v i n g s . :+I? t~pi.:;:.;,t eql ln t ion ( 5 ) '

i

n i n u s one n l t l droc;) iny, :i:e c o n s t a n t t e r n , w o b t a i n :

Page 59: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

In equa t i on ( 6 ) , (i(xi) i s t he "breakeven func t i on" f o r ~ r o q u c t i: it

s t a t e s thc! t o t a l s av ings (of domest ic p r cduc t i on over import c o s t ) when t h e

q u a n t i t y x i s produced. Cne may e a s i l y v e r i f y t h a t marginal s a d i n g s must be i

p o s i t i v e i f i t i s t o be op t imal t o produce any of t h e product . Vhen MS > 0, i

one need on ly e v a l u a t e ( f o r va lue s of xi equa l t o z e ro and tho& marg ina l l y i

I

l e s s than m u l t i p l e s of C k / q i , kaKi, t o f i n d t h e op t imal s o l u t i o n . Th is is

because t h e f u n c t i o n 3 i s upward s l o p i n g excep t a t those p o i n t s &here a f i x e d i

cha rge is i n c u r r e d , where t h e r e i s a d i s con t i noub downward "jump"d The op t ima l

s o l u t i o n might b e t o produce some of t h e product and import t h e re(mainder, even

thosgh t h e t o t a l c o s t of domes t i c a l l y producing a s u f f i c i e n t v o l d e t o meet t h e

exogenous demand is l e s s than t h e c o s t of impor t ing a l l t h a t i s d e p n d e d . This

I

Under c a p a c i t y s h s r i n g , t h e f u l l MTP model is no longer decomposable i n t o

i n d i v i d u a l "produr:t models". Nonetheless , s t i l l assuming t h e r e a r + no endogenous

i n t e r m e d i a t e i n p u t s , one can o b t a i n a "reasonably good" s o l u t i o n by f i r s t ne-

. g l e c t i n g c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g and s o l v i n g each' s i n g l e product model coddensed i n I

q u a t i o n ( 6 ) . Let x* denote t h e va lue of xi t h a t m i m i r e s t h e brsakeven func t i on . i

C a l c u l a t e e* Ck q ( B k i X$ k i - Bki x;, kaKI, wf th r e s p e c t t o 'each product

independent ly and - C

wi th r e s p e c t t o a l l t h e p roduc ts j o i n t l y . The e and e,i v a r i a b l e s a r e measures k

of unexplo i ted i n c r e a s i n g r e t u r n s ; they s t a t e t h e amount by which t h e c a p a c i t y

con s t ruc t ed i n shops of a p a r t i c u l a r p roce s s e lement f a l l s s h o r t of t h e nzaxizum

amount t h a t could be cons t ruc t ed ~ i v e n t h e f i xed c o s t s t h a t have been i ncu r r ed .

I f : (Condi t ion 1 ) x* = D, f o r a l l i such t h a t XSi > 0 ; and (Condj t i cn 2 ) - i 1

Page 60: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

- i -.

. ' ,-!.Lr + : 7 . ye 5!-cL-:a 0" < e* , K - 1 ,..., K , acd i s u c h :hat r k > 3 2 x 5 :, , z , - 1 j. .' - - . A

8. - k i . & I

-

z26el s o l ~ i t i c a s Iz715es g l o > a l o p t l r ~ 1 i ; y i f cer:aFz ~ e s t r ~ c t i z r - s 1 / - . -

ZTE 21.50 CEE. 3 r c o f s of t 5ese a s s e r t i c n s &re gF-:~n La : + e s t ~ l . a l

ar,d z l r e a d y ' ' i n existe: lceV by 7 . - t r tue of iEs use t o PrccGss

., ;-kith ,:f 0. 1-1 t h i s case, expans icn 3 prcrduct i t s

2 : ~ l r . g t3ose f i x e d c!iar&es ::':st have a l r e a d y been m e t

o:?,er products.

- 7 c n ? e z a n ~ .e i3eIs

7 - ,--- ~r .1 Y-:F-C .-; ;:-,

- * LX C c n d i z i c n I Is 'riolzted, t:?erl f: ;ray reduce systen c c s t s

s r o d u c t i o n of a ? r o l v c t f o r vh ich x: < 3 i such ;ha: XS > 0 , if * i'

to ~::pznd t h e c6paci:j. o f a s t o p ( o r s ~ v e r a l s h o p s ) r equ i red i n it..s

If Cond i t i r n 2 i s -riola:ed, then it m y reduce s j 7 s t e x roses :

:kc ~ r c d u c t i o n cf ~t l e a s ; cre of those p ~ c b u c t s r c a u i z i c g Flrciess

* k z e x 2, ;he=a ir Ls also s i :~ i -n :hat x > 12 i a s x f f i c i e n ; c c n t i l i c n 2 7 I:r.lf i

I 1.' - tka t c l e o p t k a i value of x, ~ n C e r c a 7 z c l t y starirg acsc be pcs i tkve.

I

!:o Z r . c r ~ a c e

. - i t is ?c.:s:b~e

prz2ccticn

c e a s e i e r e n t v h i c 5 e: > e-~cr some 1. i i t is l o t necraaviilp t ~ k : T L < s c + ( ~ : r~ P. i

* P f o r xhich e* > e that shsu lZ e s r e r i e n c e a rcducticr, i n 7rcdlJc:io .> :-cs5der, k k i . . I

* f z r example, a case :n uh'eh production at l e v e l r 4 r e q u L ~ e s !C, , ' [ 2 j A 5 u i t s A 1 " 1 + of capacit:; i n p r c c e s s elrrent 4, and ; ; r ~ d u c t i o n a t l e _ v e l :. . a l s r 1ret;uircs t h e

I .9

17 L

s a x nueber *>f u r . i t s c f caFzc::y L n p r o c e s s e lement k r , t ! - , ~ ~ r S e i n co ~ t k e z a - i * " T O ~ C t~ rc .q1; l r i r .g p r c c c ~ s i - ; : i? ..;is 1:rccess P . ~ F L ~ C ; ; " , ) ' ; I I F J ~ . E t h e . m

I

l/ Tne conciitior, i s s u f f i c i . x i t 5 a t n o t nc.cess?.iy. . T: .'- - .,., i t I:: ; : c : k:e,:c..:s;y :a:- :,p clc.-.,-..%L .-,., : - a tr.: I.? z ' n p i e e..:m-?l.es.. I

I

!

Page 61: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

and P l a r g e e>oocgh, t h i s can no t be o p t i n z l s i n c e t h e a s soc i a t ed i n c r e n e n t a l kl

t o t a l n a r g i n a l s av ings would n o t be s u f f i c i e n t t o o f f s e t t h e a d d i t i o n a l f i x e d

charge .

To su-riz~e, by t a k i n g t h e va lue s x* a s r e f e r e n c e p o i n t s and cons ide r i ng i

p c j s i b l e s av ings i n system c o s t s 1 ) through i n c r e a s i n g produc t ion by e x p l o i t i r g

c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g p o s s i b i l i t i e s where t h e r e a r e shops of l e s s t h a n maximum c a p a c i t y

and 2 ) through reduc ing produc t ion i n shops where economies of scale are n o t

s u f f i c i e n t l y e x p l o i t e d , one can o b t a i n a " reasonably good" solut ion. . The pro-

cedure is f u l l y s p e l l e d o u t i n Westphal and Rhee [1975]. However, t h e r e i s no

g c a r a n t e e t h a t t h e r e s u l t i n g s o l u t i o n i s t h e op t ima l s o l u t i o n ; no r i s i t p o s s i b l e

t o s t a t e how f a r i t i s from t h e g l o b a l optimum.

Breakeven a n a l y s i s c an a l s o be used when endogenous i n t e rn i ed i a t e i n p u t c o s t s

and demands must b e taken in:o account . A s no ted i n s e c t i o n 11, t h e Korean d a t a

e x h i b i t no c i r c u l a r in te rdependence among i n t e r m e d i a t e i npu t f lows. The o r d e r i n g

of p roduc t ion a c t i v i t i e s and produc ts i n such a way t h a t A = 0.0 f o r i > j i j

makes i t a s imple uatter t o c a l c u l a t e t h e lower bound, MCi, on t h e marg ina l c o s t

o f p roduc t i ng t h e i ' t h i tem: 2- 1

MCi = C V B + G + Z

A ~ i P~ , where p = min (MC , v . ) ,

k k i 1-1 1 j J ( 7 )

K, e A

and one c a l c u l a t e s n a r g i n a l c o s t s s t a r t i n g w i th t h e f i r s t product and proceeds

- i n o r d e r . Observe t h a t p i n equa t ion (7 ) is t h e same as t h a t i n t h e Marginal

1 '3 L

Cost Model. The f i r s t s t e p of ou r procedure t o o b t z i n a s o l u t i o n is t o s e t xi -,O - f o r i such t h a t ?iCi Wi. ObsZrve t h a t IIC 2 W i s a s u f f i c i e n t c o n d i t i c n t h a t x - 0 i n t h e op t ima l s o l u t i o n P i i i

- . J u s t a s lower bounds on n a r g i n a l c o s t may b e c a l c u l a t e d , upper bocnds on o u t -

put l e v e l s may be c a l c u l a t e d . And a g a i n , t h e t r i a n g u l a r i t y of t h e A mat r ix s i m -

p l i f i e s the p:ocess. Let X denote t h e upper bound on t h e p roduc t ion of t h e i ' t h i

p roduc t , then:

I

Xi Di + Z A X , f o r icI : j=i+l ij j x

Page 62: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,
Page 63: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

Furthermore, t h e r e i s no vap t o a d j u s t t h e s i n g l e p roduc t models, f o r ex&mple by

i n c l u d i n g i n d i r e c t f i x e d charges (which l e a d s t o double- counting c o s t s ) o r va lu ing

i n t e r n e d i a t e inpucs a t world p r i c e s (which l e a d s t o n e g l e c t i n g I0 in te rdependence) ,

t o g a i n a c l e a r advan tage fn r h e s o l u t i o n s ob t a ined u s ing them.

The d i s c u s s i o n has s o f a r preceeded a s i f one had e s t i m a t e s of t h e exogenous

derand l e v e l s , D However, -ae v e r e unab le t o o b t a i n such e s t i m a t e s , a s t h e i '

sample survey work which would have been r equ i r ed was beyond t he lirnits of our

r e sou rce s . I n s t e a d , t h e e n g i a e e r s provided t h e set of expected o u t p u t l e v e l s , xz.

The s o l u t i o n procedure rook t h e s e a s t h e upper bounds f o r t h e permiasab le p roduc t ion

l e v e l s i n t h e s i n g l e p rcduc t c o d e l s s t a t e d i n equa t i on (8). The s i n g l e product

model s o l u t i o n s , xo g i v e t h e s o l u t i o n wi thout c a p a c i t y sha r i ng . These va lue s i'

were then taken as r e f e r e n c e p o i n t s and a d j u s t e d accord ing t o t h e method ske tched

o u t above t o i n c r e a s e t h e p roduc t ion of product i, i.1 i f xy was l e s s than xe X' i

and i f i t was p r o f i t a b l e t o e x p l o i t c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g i n " ex i s t i ng" shops of l e s s - t h an maximum c a p a c i t y . In =king t h e adjustment t o e x p l o i t c a p a c i t y s h a r i n g pos-

s i b i l i t i e s , we were a t t emp t ing t o o b t a i n a reasonably good s o l u t i o n t o equa t i on

(9 ) , s u b j e c t t o t h e c o n s t r a i n t s t h a t x < xe i.1 i - i' x'

0 The v a l u e s of x were not a d j u s t e d t o dec r ea se t h e p rcduc t ion of sorce p roduc ts i

i if xi - x0 wi th c a p a c i t y . s h a r i n g vould r e s u l t i n such a small shop t h a t t h e a s - i

s o c i a t e d incrementa l s av ings vould n o t cover t h e f i x e d c o s t of i ts c n n s t r u c t i o n .

That is, we d i a n o t a d j u s t t he s i n g l e product model s o l u t i o n s f o r v i o l a t i o n s of 'I -

.%

Ccndi t ion 2 . Such ad jus tments v e r e i n gene ra l n o t r equ i r ed . Furthermore, by - - - B n o t making s u c p ad ju s tmen t s , b-e can s t a t e t h a t our s o l u t i o n s gove t h e upper bound * - t o t h e g l o b a l l y op t imal va lue of xi i n t h e f u l l MIF model. This is n o t a n a n a l y t -

i c a l r e s u l t , bu t r a t h e r depends upon t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e s o l i t u o n s ob-

t a i n e d .

The procedure we employed n e g l e c t s t h e m a t e r i a l ba l ance c o n s t r a i n t s . I n

t e rms of simply a s s u r i n g t h e c o n s i s t e n t c y of q u a n t i t i e s , t h i s does not c o n s t i t u t e

Page 64: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

J;

bO 1

3

do

lr

:

(3

X

U

'rl

U U

(3 u

d

0-r)rl

.rl T

I %

3

.d ffl

wa

ww

0

3

k

.-I $

a

a

>

74

.c

3

U.

00

m

.c

>

GI 4).

U

Page 65: DRDI 8 Development Research Center Discussicn Papers No. 18 The Allocative Consequences of Economics of Scale Larry E. Westphal and Yung W. Rhee January 19 7.6 L KOTE: Discussior,

. . Cherer;,, :o::is 3 . , 1952, f f0. .~rc2=zcl t ; r acd t>.e ?Lcce ler2 t lon ?rir.cis?.e, I'

E c c z c ~ . e ~ r i c z , SO, 1-22.

7 . 7 . - Cherer;r, :?g:::s 5., 1559, I I T k L-.terdeyerfence of I zves tncn t z e c l s i c n s , " Lq I!. - . - A3pLnc.,rizz, e s . 2:. , T;".? .:-llcc?:isn cl" =ccr.cr.:c: :? zcurces , Stri-2or.l: StarYcrd - Uci-,-ersity rre ss.

I n s t i h t e f o r &search i.. k c l a l Sc iecce , Vz2re r s l t y of !:orth C e r o l k e , 1953, -. "hcu t -&t - ,u t i'Lr.zlysis Sc-riet ::az-.;T Xrc:?i?rq; ( k - ~ i e t 131zrLyLyg Study :Io. 6 ) , I f .. . Chapel n~ll. (n ixeo . )

I n s t i t u t e f o r ?*search 3 Scclzl Sclezce, Cnl=-e=.si',y of !:crth Carol:,-..a, 1959, m nFroduct ion CocfYicle2ts zcd i e c h o l o g f c ~ l 'i'ren2s L? Sovie t I ~ < u s t ; - ~ : 1.n

In~ut-Cutnu' , -2-mlgsis of )iac:.lberj- C c ~ s t r c c t i o n ( Sc-r let P l a r x i z g Study 20. 7): "

]4zpxe, S, , 1973, u.3. 'IJ,.ced I x t e g e r Alge r i tF -7 Tor P r o j e c t 2 - . d - ~ r t i c n : ~ ' L? L. !-!. Goreux snd $. , 5. :!??~le, &. , :.!i11%F-i.evel ?! 3n22?z : C Z SP St7:dfe s 55 I ' ! ~ : ~ c c , A ~ s t e r d a x : ::cr"vh-!!ollar,d ?:blishLig Co .

- l!zr::o!jits, s a r y ~ :.!. , 2nd k l z n J . ncm, 1963, "J- !lachin.e - ? c c ~ - .- -- T. C a "opnans, e d . , S h d i 2 3 i n y o c e ss . : .zal~sis , .re:.~ lark : zokd? Yi ley a::& - Sons, Inc .

- V i e t o r i s z , Thcnas, 1973, 1 ' 2 2 ~ ~ 5 x 3 zt the :.!icro Lcvel : The Fez-s; ~ l e c t r i c a l - E ~ u i p ~ e n t ~ q d u s t r ; 5n :Iexico, I t iijashir.r,:on. ( 3 ~ i e o . ) - -

9 Westphrl, L o F r j 3., 1975, I1?la-ni lg ;. th ~ c o n o z l e s of ~ c z l e , "37 C . 3. 2lit=c:., m 7 - ,.. * 7. 3. Clark, 2nd L. l a y l o r , cd.;. , :-concr.-,--;;:cc : ' c d c l ~ zn.! ?~v~ !c r - ,?n% ?:-.r.ntr.c - -- - 9

London: @Lord Unlverp;+-r 3 - V J Press ( f o r t>.c Ylcrld x ~ : c ) .

n .. . . -. ;-Jest?l'lal, L.7.r~"r L., i-nd L~LYG ii. ?see, 1975, Iri. Frccezs .\;;zlysis l.!cdel c f t he - P!cchcnical ; r . g lEec rL i~ k c t c r , " h'ss'r.i?~-~n. (ni-.eo . )