© j.e. hughes clarke, omg/unb swath sonar training 2008swath sonar training 2009 femme 2009 -...

35
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/U Swath Sonar Training 2008 Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lis Assessing target detection capability using single and dual swath sonars with high definition beam forming John E. Hughes Clarke (1) David Fabre (1) , Rebecca Martinolich (1) and Melvin Broadus (2) Peter Milner and Ernest Sargent (3) (1) Ocean Mapping Group, University of New Brunswick (2) US Naval Oceanographic Office , MS, USA (3) Canadian Hydrographic Service – Pacific, Sidney, BC

Upload: andrew-atkinson

Post on 17-Jan-2016

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Assessing target detection capability using single and dual

swath sonars with high definition beam forming

John E. Hughes Clarke(1)

David Fabre(1) , Rebecca Martinolich(1) and Melvin Broadus(2) Peter Milner and Ernest Sargent(3)

(1) Ocean Mapping Group, University of New Brunswick (2) US Naval Oceanographic Office , MS, USA

(3) Canadian Hydrographic Service – Pacific, Sidney, BC

Page 2: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

USNS Bowditch and SumnerEM710 - 0.5°x1.0° - dual swath - 37m depth 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0m cubesEM122 - 1.0°x1.0° - dual swath - 4980m 40m high, 300wide knolls

CCGS VectorEM710 - 0.5°x1.0° - dual swath - 40m depth 1 and 2m boulders.

40m

60°

Most demandinginterpretation of

IHO target detection:

Special and 12.5% and 5%

Cube equivalents

across +/-60+° sectorat survey speed

8-10 knots

The requirement: 2.5%Z cube equivalents

Page 3: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Principal Controls on Topographic Resolution:

1 - Sampling Density

2 – Bottom Detection Method

Page 4: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Comparison of sounding density as a function of angular sector

12 knots, 20m of water, 1° beam spacing

+/-45° sector +/-60° sector +/-75° sector

Page 5: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

100 knots (for clarity)

1 Transmit sector

3 Transmit sectors

8 Transmit sectors

How to Implement Dual Swath

Page 6: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

(+/-70°) at 10 knotsdual swathe at 5 Hz (10Hz effective)

1 Transmit

sector

3 Transmit sectors

8 Transmit sectors

Page 7: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

EM7100.5°x1.0°dual swath

WaterColumnImaging

USNS Bowditchtarget detection

trials2.0m,1.0 mand 0.5m

Steel mesh cubes32-37m of water

Page 8: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

2mcube

1mcube

0.5mcube

EM710 0.5°x1.0° dual swath Water Column ImagingUSNS Bowditch, June 2008 - Target detection trials

Released with the permission of U.S. Naval Oceanographic Office

Page 9: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

T01

1

2

T02

3

T03

4

T04

5

T05

6

T06

“Duel” Swath – 6 Ping Cycle

81kHz

97kHz 89kHz

73kHz

73kHz81kHz

EM710Very Shallow Mode

0.3ms pulse(~3.3kHz bandwidth)

+30°

+60°

-30°

-60°

Page 10: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

2.0mcube

EM710 0.5°tx x 1.0°rcDual-swath +/-60° - 6 knots

7m

30m

USNS Bowditch – July 2008 - Saipan trialsReleased with the permission of NavOceano

SUN ILLUMINATED DTM (0.25m resolution

25m x25m view)

BACKSCATTERMOSAIC

(-10 to -35 dB)ALONG TRACKACROSS TRACKWATERCOLUMN

ANIMATION (10m x 10m view)

50°

30°

Page 11: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

1.0mcube

EM710 0.5°tx x 1.0°rcDual-swath +/-60° - 6 knots

7m

30m

USNS Bowditch – July 2008 - Saipan trialsReleased with the permission of NavOceano

SUN ILLUMINATED DTM (0.25m resolution

25m x25m view)

BACKSCATTERMOSAIC

(-10 to -35 dB)ALONG TRACKACROSS TRACKWATERCOLUMN

ANIMATION (10m x 10m view)

50°

30°

Page 12: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Savary Island – Glacial Erratic Boulder FieldsIntertidal to at least 90m.

UsingNaturally-Occuring

Boulders asTest Targets

60m

60m

50m

Page 13: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Naturally-occurring boulders rarely have an aspect ratio approaching 1

to 1

Page 14: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

1m boulder – 40m – 10 knotsEM710 0.5°x1.0° - dual swath CCGS VECTOR April 2009

10° 0° 40° 45°60°

WATERCOLUMNANIMATION

(10m x 10m view)

SUN ILLUM.DTM (0.25m res.25m x25m view)

ACROSS TRACKvert. lines = 1mhoriz.bar = 1m

ALONG TRACKvert. lines = 1mhoriz.bar = 1m

Page 15: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon20° 35° 45° 50°60°

2m boulder – 40m – 10 knotsEM710 0.5°x1.0° - dual swath CCGS VECTOR April 2009

WATERCOLUMNANIMATION

(10m x 10m view)

SUN ILLUM.DTM (0.25m res.25m x25m view)

ACROSS TRACKvert. lines = 1mhoriz.bar = 1m

ALONG TRACKvert. lines = 1mhoriz.bar = 1m

Page 16: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

The “footprint” depends on beam width and depth

ACROSS

ALO

NG

Does HDBF have any real benefit?

EQUI-ANGULAR

Independent Beam Footprints

EQUI-DISTANT

Just picking beam centre

Partially Independent Beam Footprints

+ High Definition Beam Forming

Non Independent Beam Footprints

tm tn

Across track resolutionBased on time-sampling

Page 17: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

? Centre ?Amplitude Detection:A: Peak based on running averageB: Centre of Mass based on window about A

Estimated Noise Level

AB

Phase Detection:C: intersection based on linear or quadratic regression through window from B D: IF low residual for C, reduce window by 10% and repeatE: IF low residual for D ….F: If low residual for E. ….…until < 5 samples or high residual

FE D

C

? Centre ?

B2A2

Page 18: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

What is “High Definition Beamforming” ?

If the S/N is sufficient to use a small subset of the phase slope, can choose multiple points on the curve (0, -/4, /4, /2, 3/4 etc..)

ONLY possible if no layover within beam

footprint

Page 19: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Comparing Field Trial ResultsWith a Numerical Model

•Specify targets to resolve•amplitude•wavelength•backscatter angular response

•of region•of target

1 - Field Trials:•Solutions + Water Column

2 - Modelling:•Know sonar configuration:

•Beam widths/spacing•Source Level w,r,t. Noise•Pulse Length•Pulse Repetition rate•Bottom Detection Methodology

Page 20: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

10 knots - 40m+/-65°

Shot cycle – 5Hz1m per cycle

(10 Hz – dual swath0.5 m per cycle)

5 shots

RESON 71251.0°tx. – 0.5°Rc.

single swath

EM7100.5°tx. – 1.0 Rc.

dual swath

EM7101.0°tx. – 1.0 Rc.

dual swath

EM7101.0°tx. – 2.0 Rc.

dual swath

EM7102.0°tx. – 2.0 Rc.

single swath

1.0m fore-aft

2.8m across track

~1.0° spacing1.0m fore-aft

1.4m across track

~0.5° spacing 2.0m fore-aft

2.8m across track

~1.0° spacing

0.5m fore-aft

1.4m across track

~0.5° spacing1.0m fore-aft

0.7m across track

~0.5° spacing

SONAR MODEL GEOMETRIES

Page 21: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Propagating Annulus Time Slices

Tx. Rc. Product+ seabed BS AR Differential Phase

Zero PhasePhase Wrap

Phase Wrap

Page 22: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Page 23: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

TARGET GEOMETRY

1m and 2m Pseudo-Boulders

at 40m depth

5 swaths50cm spacing along track

0.5° beam spacing

2m radius

1m height

1m radius

1m height

10°45°

60°

Page 24: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Peak Detection WMT Detection

Full Beam Phase Detection Within Beam Phase Sweep

1x1x1 m “boulder”40m – 10° incidence0.5°x1.0° - dual swath

+/-65° - 10 knots.

Page 25: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Peak Detection WMT Detection

Full Beam Phase Detection Within Beam Phase Sweep

1x1x1 m “boulder”40m – 45° incidence0.5°x1.0° - dual swath

+/-65° - 10 knots.

Page 26: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Peak Detection WMT Detection

Full Beam Phase Detection Within Beam Phase Sweep

1x1x1 m “boulder”40m – 60° incidence0.5°x1.0° - dual swath

+/-65° - 10 knots.

Page 27: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Peak Detection WMT Detection

Full Beam Phase Detection Within Beam Phase Sweep

2x2x1 m “boulder”40m – 10° incidence0.5°x1.0° - dual swath

+/-65° - 10 knots.

Page 28: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Peak Detection WMT Detection

Full Beam Phase Detection Within Beam Phase Sweep

2x2x2 m “boulder”40m – 45° incidence0.5°x1.0° - dual swath

+/-65° - 10 knots.

Page 29: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Peak Detection WMT Detection

Full Beam Phase Detection Within Beam Phase Sweep

2x2x2 m “boulder”40m – 60° incidence0.5°x1.0° - dual swath

+/-65° - 10 knots.

Page 30: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

The equivalent of a 1m cube at 40m (2.5% of depth) at 5000m is a 125m "cubic" object.

In ~4870m of water lie two knolls:

knoll A -  "gaussian" shape, ~400m wide at base -  ~50m high knoll B -  "gaussian" shape, ~300m wide at base -  ~35m high

Deep Water (~5000m) Target Detection

EM122 1° x1°8km6km

4km2km

125m

5m contours

Page 31: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

0000m0°

2000m22°

4000m39°

6000m50°

8000m58°

EM122 - 5000m – 8 knots.

Page 32: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

0000m0°

2000m22°

4000m39°

0000m0°

EM122 - 5000m – 8 knots.

+/- 45° +/- 25°

Page 33: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Summary A

2.5% cubes are achievable

– BUT requires:

A - High and Even Sounding Density:

•at 10 knots, requires – dual-swath •No point in dual swath if no multiple sectors.

•No point if not multi-sector pitch and yaw stabilized.

Barely 3 strikeson a 1m3

Page 34: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Summary BB - Bottom Detection:

•As across-track dimension larger than required resolution, rely heavily on HDBF.

– only useful at lower grazing angles (no layover)

•Where target aspect ratio is too high, will track common slant range (peak or WMT detect) over sector significantly wider than physical beam width.

- O.5° Rc (7125 – superior).

Within Beam Phase Sweep

Peak Detection

Page 35: © J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon Assessing target detection capability using single

© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB

Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon

Now that we actually “detect” 2.5% cubes...

The next challenge is to resolve their shape

Q’s ?