© j.e. hughes clarke, omg/unb swath sonar training 2008swath sonar training 2009 femme 2009 -...
TRANSCRIPT
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Assessing target detection capability using single and dual
swath sonars with high definition beam forming
John E. Hughes Clarke(1)
David Fabre(1) , Rebecca Martinolich(1) and Melvin Broadus(2) Peter Milner and Ernest Sargent(3)
(1) Ocean Mapping Group, University of New Brunswick (2) US Naval Oceanographic Office , MS, USA
(3) Canadian Hydrographic Service – Pacific, Sidney, BC
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
USNS Bowditch and SumnerEM710 - 0.5°x1.0° - dual swath - 37m depth 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0m cubesEM122 - 1.0°x1.0° - dual swath - 4980m 40m high, 300wide knolls
CCGS VectorEM710 - 0.5°x1.0° - dual swath - 40m depth 1 and 2m boulders.
40m
60°
Most demandinginterpretation of
IHO target detection:
Special and 12.5% and 5%
Cube equivalents
across +/-60+° sectorat survey speed
8-10 knots
The requirement: 2.5%Z cube equivalents
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Principal Controls on Topographic Resolution:
1 - Sampling Density
2 – Bottom Detection Method
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Comparison of sounding density as a function of angular sector
12 knots, 20m of water, 1° beam spacing
+/-45° sector +/-60° sector +/-75° sector
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
100 knots (for clarity)
1 Transmit sector
3 Transmit sectors
8 Transmit sectors
How to Implement Dual Swath
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
(+/-70°) at 10 knotsdual swathe at 5 Hz (10Hz effective)
1 Transmit
sector
3 Transmit sectors
8 Transmit sectors
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
EM7100.5°x1.0°dual swath
WaterColumnImaging
USNS Bowditchtarget detection
trials2.0m,1.0 mand 0.5m
Steel mesh cubes32-37m of water
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
2mcube
1mcube
0.5mcube
EM710 0.5°x1.0° dual swath Water Column ImagingUSNS Bowditch, June 2008 - Target detection trials
Released with the permission of U.S. Naval Oceanographic Office
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
T01
1
2
T02
3
T03
4
T04
5
T05
6
T06
“Duel” Swath – 6 Ping Cycle
81kHz
97kHz 89kHz
73kHz
73kHz81kHz
EM710Very Shallow Mode
0.3ms pulse(~3.3kHz bandwidth)
0°
+30°
+60°
-30°
-60°
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
2.0mcube
EM710 0.5°tx x 1.0°rcDual-swath +/-60° - 6 knots
7m
30m
USNS Bowditch – July 2008 - Saipan trialsReleased with the permission of NavOceano
SUN ILLUMINATED DTM (0.25m resolution
25m x25m view)
BACKSCATTERMOSAIC
(-10 to -35 dB)ALONG TRACKACROSS TRACKWATERCOLUMN
ANIMATION (10m x 10m view)
50°
30°
0°
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
1.0mcube
EM710 0.5°tx x 1.0°rcDual-swath +/-60° - 6 knots
7m
30m
USNS Bowditch – July 2008 - Saipan trialsReleased with the permission of NavOceano
SUN ILLUMINATED DTM (0.25m resolution
25m x25m view)
BACKSCATTERMOSAIC
(-10 to -35 dB)ALONG TRACKACROSS TRACKWATERCOLUMN
ANIMATION (10m x 10m view)
50°
30°
0°
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Savary Island – Glacial Erratic Boulder FieldsIntertidal to at least 90m.
UsingNaturally-Occuring
Boulders asTest Targets
60m
60m
50m
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Naturally-occurring boulders rarely have an aspect ratio approaching 1
to 1
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
1m boulder – 40m – 10 knotsEM710 0.5°x1.0° - dual swath CCGS VECTOR April 2009
10° 0° 40° 45°60°
WATERCOLUMNANIMATION
(10m x 10m view)
SUN ILLUM.DTM (0.25m res.25m x25m view)
ACROSS TRACKvert. lines = 1mhoriz.bar = 1m
ALONG TRACKvert. lines = 1mhoriz.bar = 1m
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon20° 35° 45° 50°60°
2m boulder – 40m – 10 knotsEM710 0.5°x1.0° - dual swath CCGS VECTOR April 2009
WATERCOLUMNANIMATION
(10m x 10m view)
SUN ILLUM.DTM (0.25m res.25m x25m view)
ACROSS TRACKvert. lines = 1mhoriz.bar = 1m
ALONG TRACKvert. lines = 1mhoriz.bar = 1m
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
The “footprint” depends on beam width and depth
ACROSS
ALO
NG
Does HDBF have any real benefit?
EQUI-ANGULAR
Independent Beam Footprints
EQUI-DISTANT
Just picking beam centre
Partially Independent Beam Footprints
+ High Definition Beam Forming
Non Independent Beam Footprints
tm tn
Across track resolutionBased on time-sampling
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
? Centre ?Amplitude Detection:A: Peak based on running averageB: Centre of Mass based on window about A
Estimated Noise Level
AB
Phase Detection:C: intersection based on linear or quadratic regression through window from B D: IF low residual for C, reduce window by 10% and repeatE: IF low residual for D ….F: If low residual for E. ….…until < 5 samples or high residual
FE D
C
? Centre ?
B2A2
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
What is “High Definition Beamforming” ?
If the S/N is sufficient to use a small subset of the phase slope, can choose multiple points on the curve (0, -/4, /4, /2, 3/4 etc..)
ONLY possible if no layover within beam
footprint
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Comparing Field Trial ResultsWith a Numerical Model
•Specify targets to resolve•amplitude•wavelength•backscatter angular response
•of region•of target
1 - Field Trials:•Solutions + Water Column
2 - Modelling:•Know sonar configuration:
•Beam widths/spacing•Source Level w,r,t. Noise•Pulse Length•Pulse Repetition rate•Bottom Detection Methodology
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
10 knots - 40m+/-65°
Shot cycle – 5Hz1m per cycle
(10 Hz – dual swath0.5 m per cycle)
5 shots
RESON 71251.0°tx. – 0.5°Rc.
single swath
EM7100.5°tx. – 1.0 Rc.
dual swath
EM7101.0°tx. – 1.0 Rc.
dual swath
EM7101.0°tx. – 2.0 Rc.
dual swath
EM7102.0°tx. – 2.0 Rc.
single swath
1.0m fore-aft
2.8m across track
~1.0° spacing1.0m fore-aft
1.4m across track
~0.5° spacing 2.0m fore-aft
2.8m across track
~1.0° spacing
0.5m fore-aft
1.4m across track
~0.5° spacing1.0m fore-aft
0.7m across track
~0.5° spacing
SONAR MODEL GEOMETRIES
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Propagating Annulus Time Slices
Tx. Rc. Product+ seabed BS AR Differential Phase
Zero PhasePhase Wrap
Phase Wrap
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
TARGET GEOMETRY
1m and 2m Pseudo-Boulders
at 40m depth
5 swaths50cm spacing along track
0.5° beam spacing
2m radius
1m height
1m radius
1m height
10°45°
60°
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Peak Detection WMT Detection
Full Beam Phase Detection Within Beam Phase Sweep
1x1x1 m “boulder”40m – 10° incidence0.5°x1.0° - dual swath
+/-65° - 10 knots.
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Peak Detection WMT Detection
Full Beam Phase Detection Within Beam Phase Sweep
1x1x1 m “boulder”40m – 45° incidence0.5°x1.0° - dual swath
+/-65° - 10 knots.
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Peak Detection WMT Detection
Full Beam Phase Detection Within Beam Phase Sweep
1x1x1 m “boulder”40m – 60° incidence0.5°x1.0° - dual swath
+/-65° - 10 knots.
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Peak Detection WMT Detection
Full Beam Phase Detection Within Beam Phase Sweep
2x2x1 m “boulder”40m – 10° incidence0.5°x1.0° - dual swath
+/-65° - 10 knots.
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Peak Detection WMT Detection
Full Beam Phase Detection Within Beam Phase Sweep
2x2x2 m “boulder”40m – 45° incidence0.5°x1.0° - dual swath
+/-65° - 10 knots.
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Peak Detection WMT Detection
Full Beam Phase Detection Within Beam Phase Sweep
2x2x2 m “boulder”40m – 60° incidence0.5°x1.0° - dual swath
+/-65° - 10 knots.
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
The equivalent of a 1m cube at 40m (2.5% of depth) at 5000m is a 125m "cubic" object.
In ~4870m of water lie two knolls:
knoll A - "gaussian" shape, ~400m wide at base - ~50m high knoll B - "gaussian" shape, ~300m wide at base - ~35m high
Deep Water (~5000m) Target Detection
EM122 1° x1°8km6km
4km2km
125m
5m contours
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
0000m0°
2000m22°
4000m39°
6000m50°
8000m58°
EM122 - 5000m – 8 knots.
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
0000m0°
2000m22°
4000m39°
0000m0°
EM122 - 5000m – 8 knots.
+/- 45° +/- 25°
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Summary A
2.5% cubes are achievable
– BUT requires:
A - High and Even Sounding Density:
•at 10 knots, requires – dual-swath •No point in dual swath if no multiple sectors.
•No point if not multi-sector pitch and yaw stabilized.
Barely 3 strikeson a 1m3
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Summary BB - Bottom Detection:
•As across-track dimension larger than required resolution, rely heavily on HDBF.
– only useful at lower grazing angles (no layover)
•Where target aspect ratio is too high, will track common slant range (peak or WMT detect) over sector significantly wider than physical beam width.
- O.5° Rc (7125 – superior).
Within Beam Phase Sweep
Peak Detection
© J.E. Hughes Clarke, OMG/UNB
Swath Sonar Training 2008Swath Sonar Training 2009 FEMME 2009 - Lisbon
Now that we actually “detect” 2.5% cubes...
The next challenge is to resolve their shape
Q’s ?