© penn state food safety and sanitation for food manufacturers course equipment sanitary design

41
© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Course http://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html Equipment Sanitary Equipment Sanitary Design Design

Upload: lawrence-jackson

Post on 03-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Equipment Sanitary Equipment Sanitary DesignDesign

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overall Design

• Equipment should be designed so that it is easy to clean and sanitize

• The equipment at right looks like it would be difficult to disassemble and clean.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overall Design

• Closed-box construction should be avoided unless the seams can be hermetically sealed.

Do you think this seam is adequately sealed to prevent moisture entry?

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overall Design

• Areas where any type of particle can get inside should have a wide enough access point for cleaning fluids to enter and drain out.

This hole looks too small to allow for quick drainage

This hole is large enough for cleaning brushes to penetrate and water to quickly drain.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overall Design

• Crevices, overlapping parts, bolt threads, and other contamination collection points should be eliminated through simple uncluttered design.

Is this hole necessary? Could this edge be better sealed?

Bolt spacers are good sanitary design. They help to keep

moisture away from threads

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overall Design

• Parts should be connected by smooth welds, or spacers and bolts with unexposed threads.

These are collection points for soils and

bacteria

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overall Design

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overall Design

• Equipment floor supports should be constructed to they will not accumulate soils.

• These are examples of poor sanitary design and construction

Collection points for soils

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Porous Metal

• Porous materials such as this piece of aluminum are a potential breeding ground for bacteria.

• Stainless steel polished to a high level or the use of anodized or similar processed aluminum are acceptable.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Corroded metal

• Corrosion introduces sites where soils can accumulate and bacteria can grow.

• They are almost impossible to clean and sanitize

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Build-up areas for soils

• A scratch on a piece of stainless steel acts as a harborage point for Listeria.

• An incorrectly designed piece of equipment provides sites for soils and bacteria to accumulate.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Build-up areas for soils

• Collection points like this are unacceptable.

• Where buildup occurs harmful bacteria or allergens can accumulate.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Build-up areas for soils

• This modified piece of food equipment provides places for harmful contaminants to hide. The best design is the original design.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Connection joints

• Connections such as this one give many areas for contaminants to build up while keeping out cleaning solutions.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Connection joints

• This connection does not provide adequate space for pressurized water to enter, but does provide a place for bacteria to hide and multiply.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Connection joints

• The polished round spacers used with this connection joint keep food particles and bacteria from hiding and give plenty of places for water to wash out contaminants.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Connection joints

• Another picture of the spacers from below.

Acceptable connections need to be done using either smooth welds or use spacer connectors such as these.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overlapping Parts

• Tight fittings provide excellent places for containments to hide, while making disinfecting difficult and almost impossible for cleaning crews to perform.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overlapping Parts

• Wide-open mountings allow adequate room for pressurized water to force out any bacteria harboring food particles.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overlapping Parts

• This particular design provides a removable tray for cleaning. The removable tray does not provide sufficient overlap to prevent food particles from entering the body of the piece of equipment.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overlapping Parts

• This piece, in contrast, has a minimal-contact overlapping design which does not allow material to enter the equipment body during normal use.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overlapping Parts

• Metal / plastic junction provides a site for soils to accumulate and is difficult to clean

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Overlapping Parts

Overlapping surfaces of belt tensioner are not accessible

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Drainage – Equipment Edges

Good design

Poor design

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Drainage

• The drainage hole on the bottom of this piece of equipment gives a place for water and contaminants to drain

• The placement of a connecting piece with no spacers next to the drainage hole will ensure the buildup of bacteria.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Drainage

• This design, on the other hand, provides for easy unobstructed draining.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Drainage

• Another example of potential drainage problems.

• Although the drainage hole has been provided in the design, there are many obstructions where contaminants can be trapped.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Wash Access Points

• Corners are almost completely closed on this piece of equipment

• Particles can get stuck allowing bacteria to grow

• Not enough room for cleaning solutions to enter and drain

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Wash Access Points

• Better corner

• Wide openings allow cleaners and sanitizers to enter and drain

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Crevices

• The closed-box construction of the back of this piece of equipment, which is not hermetically sealed provides many small places for contaminants to enter but not enough area for cleaning fluids to enter and drainage to occur.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Crevices

• This particular design uses an open-back construction for a supporting piece.

• Since hermetically sealing a box is difficult and expensive, this type of design is preferred for its cleanability.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Crevices

• Interface between serial number plate and the equipment surface provides harborage sites

• Attachment screws make thorough cleaning impossible

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Crevices

• The control panel on this piece of equipment has a crevice around the controller.

• This type of design is especially dangerous since the bacteria-harboring design is also a main point of contact for the user who is likely to touch (and contaminate) food after using this panel.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Crevices

• The corner construction on this piece of equipment is particularly bad. A supporting piece of welded bar steel provides a point for food material to hide and bacteria to grow.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Crevices

• The shock absorber shown here is yet another point for contaminants to hide.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Crevices

• The shock absorber shown cannot be easily removed and replaced without tools. It also is not adequately sealed and is not made of non-porous neoprene, a bacteria resistance bushing material.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Crevices

• The spring and screw head used here are both difficult and likely impossible to clean. A major bacteria harborage point.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Crevices

• The spiral-type cord connector is yet another place for food particles to collect and bacteria to hide. All surfaces should be smooth when possible.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Exposed Threads

• These types of polished stainless steel nuts, cover bolt threads and provide few places for bacteria to cling.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Exposed Threads

• The nuts used here minimize thread exposure, while the nut's plastic top and bottom also ensure that bacteria will not collect on the unexposed parts of the threads.

© Penn State Food Safety and Sanitation for Food Manufacturers Coursehttp://www.foodscience.psu.edu/e-learning.html

Acknowledgments

• American Meat Institute for equipment photos www.SanitaryDesign.com

• Don Ewes, Girton Manufacturing for weld and equipment edge samples