- racheting - experimental tests and pr'tical method of

20
DEPARTMENT DES ETUDES MECAMQUE5 ET THERMIQUES - Racheting - Experimental tests and pr'tical method of analysis - P. COUSSERAN - J. LEBEY - D. MOULIN - R. 30CHE - G. CLEMENT International conference on engineering aspects . of creep. Sheffield, GB, September 15 - 19, 1980. CEA - CONF 5480 L

Upload: others

Post on 09-Feb-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

DEPARTMENT DES ETUDES MECAMQUE5 ET THERMIQUES

- Racheting - Experimental tests and pr'tical method of analysis

- P. COUSSERAN - J. LEBEY - D. MOULIN - R. 30CHE - G. CLEMENT

International conference on engineering aspects . of creep. Sheffield, GB, September 15 - 19, 1980. CEA - CONF 5480

L

I - INTRODUCTION

In absence of creep, and when the behaviour of material is solely elastic-plastic, it is easy to define the ratcheting, or progressive distortion. There is ratcheting when, under the effect of cyclic solicitations, an increment of deformation appears at each cycle. This state is the opposite of shake-down where, after application of a few cycles, the structure keeps the same geometry.

When creep can not be neglected, that is to say when phenomena are time-depending, such a simple definition is no longer suitable. In this paper, one will call ratcheting the acceleration of deformation, under controlled load, due to imposed cyclic defor­mations. In other words, we give our attention to the increase of creep elongation in presence of cyclic deformations, such as ther­mal straining.

With the development of modern techniques, and in par­ticular Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactors, the survey of conse­quences of this phenomenon has become very important, in order to get a safe design. Thus, there is a strong need for convenient, effective, and safe design rules.

Concerning the design of nuclear reactors, construction Codes give some indications C 1 } ' C 23- When creep is not to be con­sidered, rules are rather of nature to get a pure elastic behaviour, required for the validity of fatigue analysis. At high temperature, various very conservative rules are proposed of which the field of application is very limited. The aim of this paper is to bring a contribution for the establishment of a conservative design rule, with a wide field of application and an easy mode of utilization.

II - PREVIOUS WORKS AND PRACTICAL USE

The rules proposed in the construction Codes result only from theoretical works. The first ones were carried out by Miller ^3] and Hill £4] ; important developments were made by Edmunds and Beer C5], and by Bree t 63' C 73 w n o n a s established well known dia­grams. Additional studies are due to Burgreen £8, 9, IO] as well as Townley £lll and Zarka C 1 2J« More suited to creep problems are the

- 2 -

O'Donnel-Porowski contributions £l3]. The state of the matter v/as reviewed by Leckie ̂ 14] r Roche £l5], Finley and Spence £l6], and Krempl £l7].

Nevertheless, noticeable efforts were made in the field experimental investigations by various authors. Experiments on structures were performed by Kano £l8], Corum £l9], Moreton and Moffat £20].

More basic tests on structural elements and various spe­cimens were carried out by Ainsworth £21], Conway [[22], Ronay £23], Inoue £24], Anderson £25, 26], Udoguchi £27], Nozue £28], Boulais £29, 30], Uga £31, 32], Lebey £33, 34], Cousseran £35],

Under examination, it seems to be surprising to the au­thors of this paper that these various experimental data were not put; under consideration for the establishment of design rules. This situation seems very strange for all the theoretical works are ba­sed on very simplified behaviour models of materials, such as no hardening or kinematic hardening, whereas it appears from experi­ment that no one of these models fits correctly the actual beha­viour of materials £.36].

It must be pointed out that cyclic hardening effects are never taken into account in these computations, and that strain har­dening models are very far from the real behaviour of material^ 2,4 3]

Results of tests performed in Saclay have led the authors to develop an evaluation of the experimental data usable to set up a design rule. Thus, it is useful to give some indications about the way used for this purpose.

Ill - DESCRIPTION OF TESTS PERFORMED IN SACLAY

These tests are extensively reported in references £29, 30,33, 34, 35], Only the main features are given here. The ratchet tests were performed on thin tubular specimens (O.D. 11 mm, thiefc2"* ness 0.5 mm, length 300 mm) subjected to a constant tensile load and, simultaneously to a cyclic twist motion (fig. 1).

The materials of interest are 304 L and 316 L stainless steel ; the tests have been performed at room temperature and at 300°C.

- 3 -

The fir. t stage of the tests was the measurement of me­chanical characteristics of these steels at the test temperatures ; relating to 316 L steel, a moticeable cold creep v/as observed.

The results obtained are the values of incremental and cumu­lative elongations, function of number of twist cycles, see exam­ple on Fig. 2.

IV - METHOD FOR EVALUATION OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA

In such tests, it is easy to distinguish the tensile primary stress (load controlled stress in this case), and the torsional secondary stress (deformation controlled stress).

The primary stress intensity is equal to :

p _ Tensile load Cross section area

and, according to the TRESCA criterion, the range AQ of the secon­dary stress intensity is given by :

AQ = 2 G-lAy

These two quantities define the loading conditions. The main result obtained from each test is the non elastic elongation e , depending on the test duration, and on the number of cycles (for a given material and test temperature).

A first presentation of results consists in the cons­truction of sets of isodeformation (e ) curves in the field of the two loadings (Bree diagrams type). Such a diagram is shown, for illustration,on fig. 3, on which the values of P and AQ are rela­ted to the yield strength a 0.2 of the material.

It was found judicious to translate this elongation in*-to terms of stress by introduction of an effective rrimary stress P ~~. This effective primary stress is defined as follow :

(i) It is a primary stress (ii) It is applied without secondary stress (iii) It gives the same deformation as the one due to both the

L

- 4 -

actual primary stress P and the secondary stress ÛQ applied toge­ther during a ratchet test, the time of application of P e f£ being equal to the duration of the ratchet test.

As an example the values concerning one of our tests (n° 39) are the following :

P = 246 MPa AC = 3i0 MPa Duration of test : 335 h. E

p = i- 3 0 *

From the isochronous curve of the material (for t=335 h) this elongation could be obtained by the application of a stress

( equal to 291 MPa ; this i\» the value of the effective primary stress P e f f

Using P _f is justified when the number of cycles rea­ches a few tens ; nevertheless, it appears from experiment that there is only a little influence of lower numbers of cycles on the validity of this method. The deformation obtained for various frequencies going from 3 to 68 cycles per hour (tests n° 41-42-43) is given, as a function of time, on fig. 4.

One can see that the effect of the frequency vanishes ( after a relatively short while. For the tests plotted on this dia­

gram, the elongation at t = 100 hours is equal to 3 % ; from cold creep curves these values are met for a stress equal to 330 MPa ; consequently the va?ue of P e ff is 330 MPa. Th« cold creep curve for a 330 MPa tensile stress, drawn on fig. 4, fits well the rat­chet test curves, the higher the frequency, the faster the concor­dance.

The complete evaluation of a test is as follow :

(i) Determination of P e fr as said previously (ii) Calculation of the secondary stress ratio SR

S R = AQ S R P + LQ

« • M M M B

(iii) Calculation of the efficiency index V

V = P

Peff

(iiii) Plotting of experimental points on an efficiency diagram in the field SR - V (fig. 5)

V - PROPOSITION FOR A ROLE

When examining the points of Fig. 5, it appears that they are groupei into a rather narrow band ; so it seems possible to propose a curve giving an upper bound of the progressive dis­tortion. The choice of such a curve requires a large amount cf ex­perimental data.

A first attempt can be made by using the well known Bree diagram. In this diagram, the material is assumed elastic per­fectly plastic. When a primary stress is applied to the material, only two events can happen. If the stress is below the yield strength, there is no plastic deformation ; on the contrary, if the stress is equal to yield strength, the plastic deformation can reach any value. There is the same distinction in the Bree diagram : in one part of this diagram, there is no ratcheting ; in the other part, the plastic deformation can reach any value de­pending on the number of applied cycles. Hence, the curve sharing these two parts must be considered as equivalent to an effective stress equal to the yield strength of the material. The equation is

for V < 0.5 SR =

for V > 0.5 SR =

1 + V 2

1 - V 1 - 0.75 V

This curve,which is drawn on fig. 6, can be used for the design in order to avoid large distortions when ratcheting can occur in the creep temperature range (it can be used too when creep ef­fects are not significant), When a primary stress P is applied in combination with a cyclic straining corresponding to a secondary stress of intensity AQ, the following process must be applied :

- 6 -

(i) Computation of SR = p ^ (ii) Determination of V with the help of the design curve (see

fig. 6) p (iii) Computation of P e f f - «

All design limits concerning the primary stress must be applied to P f f in lieu of P itself. For instance, if the gene­ral primary membrane stress P is concerned, it is necessary to determine P e* f _ according to the precedent process. P e « _ should not exceed S_. (level A and B s r -vice limits) mt

{ i i i i > Peff m « Smt

f where S . is determined for the duration of application of the loa­ding.

Code requirements [2] related to primary stress must be applied to the effective primary stress instead of the primary stress itself. S. limits the deformation to 1 % during the time of application of the load ; accordingly, this method limits also the membrane deformation to 1 %.

VI - VALIDATION

. Various published experimental data have been used for the validation of the proposed design curve.

Analyses of these data, according to the proposed method are made in ref £37, 38, 39, 403 • All the results are gathered on fig. 7, where one can see that the curve is conservative.

A particular mention can be made concerning the test TT-1 from réf £37^. After the third cycle of this test, the Qum»r lative strain is equal to 0.207 %, for a 504 hours accumulated hold time. By application of the proposed method, the P f i f f value for this case is equal to 12,764 psi. When considering the thir­teenth cycle, the cumulative strain is 0.338 %, for a time equal to 2184 hours, arid P , f is now equal to 12,667 psi. The two values of P f f are almost identical, but very different from the primary

- 7 -

stress which is equal to 7/527 psi-

It is also interesting to compare the design rule propo­sed here with the 0*Donnel-Porowski approach. In using the same way that the one used for the Bree diagram, it can be seen that a lot of curves are obtained at the vicinity of the design curve, this latter one being the most conservative.

VII - CONCLUSIONS

From available experimental results known up to now, one can propose a simplified method to prevent ratcheting ; it is based on the notion of an effective primary stress P-f*.--

Nowadays, a very conservative design curve has been chonen, of which the efficiency can be improved by further works, involving new tests data and more careful analysis.

This process is included in a RAMSES rule £4l]. From use, it appears that the main difficulty consists in the good choice of the primary stress, if one considers the risk of elastic follow-up, but this is a problem different form the ratchet one.

This method could also bean improved by taking in ac­count some characteristics of the material, such as the yield strength (see fig. 5). The authors think that cyclic characteris­tics could be used.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS :

The authors wish to acknowledge the members of RAMSES Committee for stimulating discussions about this subject, and the C.E.A. for its support and interest in this study.

REFERENCES

£l3 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III The American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME New-York 1977

£23 ASME Code Case N.47-15 (1592-15) "Class 1 Components in Elevated Temperature Service" ASME New-York 1979

£33 MILLER D.R. "Thermal Stress Ratchet Mechanism in Pressure Vessels" - Trans. ASME Vol.81 - Séries DN°2 - 1959 Pages 190-196

P O HILL. R. "The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity" - Bending under Tension. Chap. XI-2 - Oxford University Press Oxford 1960 - Pages 292-293

£5]] EDMUNDS H.G. and BEER F.J. "Notes on Incremental Collapse in Pressure Vessels" Journal of Mech. Ens. Sciences. Vol. 3 - 1961, pages 187-199

£&3 BREE J. "Elastic Plastic Behaviour of Thin Tubes Subjected tc Internal Iressure and Intermittent High Heat F?.vxes with Application to Fast Nuclear Reactor Fuel Elements" Journal of Strain Analysis - Vol. 2 - 1967 - pages 226-233

£73 BREE J. "Incremental Growth due to Creep and Plastic Yielding of Thin Tubes Subjected to Internal Pressure and Cyclic Thermal Stresses" Journal of Strain Analysis -Vol. 3 - 1968 - pages 122-127

Q8l BURGREEN D. "The Thermal Ratchet Mechanism" Journal of Basic Engineering 90 - Sep. 1968 - Pages 319-324

£93 BURGREEN D. "Structural Growth Induced by Thermal Cycling" Journal of Basic Engineering 90 - Dec. 1968 Pages 469-475

- 9 -

£l0] BURSREEN D. "Design Methods for Power Plants Structures" C-P. Press - New-York 1975

[[ll] TOWNLEY C. "The Application of Elastic-Plastic Analysis to the Design of Pressure Vessels" CEGB Report RD/B/N 1107 - 1968

£l2] ZARKA J. and all "A Practical method to determine Elastic or Plastic Shakedown of Structures". "In simplified Methods in Pressure Vessel Analysis" (Ed. Barsoum R.S) ASHE 1978

Ql3] O'DONNEL. H and POROWSKI J. "Upper Bound for Accumulated Strains due to Creep Ratcheting" WRC Bulletin 195 June 1974 Pages 57-6/:

£l4] LECKIE F. "A Review of Bounding Techniques in Shakedown and Ratcheting at Elevated Temperatures" (Part 2 - Ratcheting Effects in Absence of Creep) in WRC Bulletin 195 June 1974 pages 4-11.

£15]] ROCHE R. "Progressive distortion (in French) "2nd Nat. Symp. on Pressure Vessel Technology. ASSN Françaises des Ingénieurs en Appareils à Pression - Paris-Oct. 1977 - pages 297-341 -Vo! 2.

£l63 FINLEY G. and SPENCE J. "Applying the Shakedown concept to Pressure Vessels Design" Engineering - Vol. 226 Juil. 1968 - Pages 63-65.

[[17] KREMPL E. "Cyclic Creep . An Interpretative Littérature SurveywW.R.C. Bulletin 195 June 1974 - Pages 63-123

£l8] KANO T. and INOUE T. "Design and Research Status for Ther^" mal Transients in Japanese LMFBR Plants" PNC N.241 74.06 - Power React, and Nue. Fuel. DEVE. Corp. Japan - June 1974

- 10 -

[l9~} CORUH J.M. - YOUNG H.C. and GRINOELL A.G. "Thermal Ratcheting in Pipes subjected to Intermittent Thermal Downshocks at Elevated Temperatures" Second Nat. Cong, on Press. Vessels and Piping. San Francisco - California (ASHE) June 1975, pages 47-58.

£203 MORETON D.N. and MOFFAT D.G. "Shakedown of three Stainless Steel Pressure Vessel Components" Third Int. Conf. on Pressure Vessel Technology - Tokyo Part 1. April 1977 - Pages 233-245

[2l[] AlrJSWORTH R.A. "An Experimental Study of a Three-Bars Struc­ture subjected to Variable Temperature" Int. J. Mech. Sci. Vol. 19 - pages 247-256

£223 CONWAY J.B. - BERLING J.T. - STENTZ R.H. - PUGH C E . -ANDERSON W.F.

"Thermal Ratcheting Studies of type 304 Stainless Steel. An Evaluation of a New Test Procedure" Sympo­sium on Struct. Hat. for Service at Elevated Temp, in Nuclear Power Generation. Houston ASHE MPC1 -Nov. 1975 - pages 247-281

[233 RONAY H. "Interaction of Cyclic Torsion with Axial Loads" ASTH. STP 404 1966 - pages 176-189

£24] INOUE K. - NAKAGAWA K. - FUJIYAMA H. "Accumulation of Axial Strain of a Cylindrical Bar under Combined Cyclic Torsion and Axial Load" Technology Reports Osaka University, Japan 26 -March 1976 - pages 223 - 231

[[25] ANDERSON W.F. - "Creep Ratcheting Deformation and Rupture""* Damage induced by a Thermal Transient Stress Cycle Design for Elev. Temp. Env. ASME 1971 - pages 1-11

[[263 ANDERSON W.F. "Ratcheting Deformation as Affected by Rela­tive Variation of the Loading Sequence" - Pressure Vessel Techn. Part 1 -- Design and Analysis, 2nd Int. Conf. San Antonio Texas USA - ASMB 1973 pages 277-239

- Il -

[[27]] UDOGUCIII T. - ASADA Y. - KITSUHASHI S. - AHOIZUSHI H. "Accumulation of Longitudinal Strain under Cyclic Torsion" Fracture 1977 - Vol. 2 ICF4 - Waterloo -Canada - June 1977 - pages 1195-1200

([283 HOZUE Y. UDOGUCttl T. ASADA Y. - NITSUHASHI S. "An Experimental Study on Cyclic Strain induced Creep, Relationship between Different Modes of Stress and Strain Superposition" Fracture 1977 - Vol. 2 - ICF4--tfaterloo - Canada - Tune 1977 - pages 767-775

£293 BOULAIS J. BKXIARD D. LKBEY J. AMD ROCHE R. "Progressive Distortion Tests on 304 L Stainless Steel at Room Temperature (in French) Note CEA n* 2058 S*pt. 1978

([303 BOULAIS J. - COUSSERAM P. - LEBEY J. and ROCHE R. "Progressive Distortion Test on 304 L Stainless Steel at Room Temperature (in french) Complement to note CEA 2058" - Mote CEA n* 2083 - March 1979.

£3l3 USA ?• "An experimental Study of Progressive Strain Growth due to Thermal-Stress Ratcheting" Transactions of the /SME Vol. lOf - April 1978 - pages 150-156

f323 UGA T. "An Experimental Study on Thermal Stress Ratcheting or Austenitic Stainless Steel by a three bars Specimen" Nuclear Engeneering and Design 26 - 1974 - pages 326-335.

[|333 LEBEY J. and ROCHE R. "Tests on Mechanical Behaviour of 304 L Stainless Steel under constant Stress associated with Cyclic Strain" - Fatigue of Eng. Mat. and Strue. Vol. 1 M* 3 - May 1979 - pages 307-318.

£343 LEBEY J. - ROCHE R. and COUSSERAM P. "Experimental Tests on Ratchet of Tubular Specimens (Torsion and Tension) Use for Material Characterization" 5th Int. Conf. SMIRT - Berlin - Vol. L 5/3 Aug. 1979 - Pages 1 - 8 .

- 12 -

[35] COUSSERAN P. and all "Progressive Distortion Test on 316 L Stainless Steel at room Temperature (in french) - Note CEA to be published.

^363 HANCELL P.J. and HARVEY S.J. "The use of Kinematic Hardening Models in Multi-Axial Cyclic Plasticity" Fatigue of Eng. Mat. and Struct. Vol. 1 - April 1979 - pages 271-279

£37] MOULIN D. "Verification of the CEA/DEMT Method for Appraisal of the Progressive Distortion - Application to T.T.I Test Performed in Oak-Ridge National Laboratory" Note CEA to be published

£38] MOULIN D. "Analysis of the Progressive Distortion Validi-tion of CEA-DEMT Method based on effective primary stress. Discussion of ANDERSON'S Experimental data"-Note CEA to be published.

[393 THOMAS P. "Progressive Distortion - Use of Experimental Results (tests performed by T. UGA)" - Note CEA to be published.

[403 CLEMENT G. "Survey of Experimental Tests about Progressive Distortion" - Note CEA to be published.

£4l3 JAKUBOWICZ H. - PETREQUIN P. - SCHALLER K. "Rules for the Analysis of Mechanical Structures at Elevated Temperatures" - 5th Int. Conf. SMIRT -Berlin - Vol. L 5/3 - Aug. 1979 - pages 1 - 7 .

£423 PHILLIPS A. "Experimental Plasticity - Some Thoughs on its present Status and possible future trends" in Problems of Plasticity - Ed. A. SAWCZYK - Nordhof Int. Publ. Leyden - 1974

[433 GREENSTREET W.L. "Structural Analysis Technology for High Temperature Design" L 3/2 in TR. of 3rd Int. Conf. on SMIRT Ed. J. Jaeger North Holland Pub. Cy -Amsterdam - 1975

I

A XIfit ELO*C*TIO»/

ME AS cszcrcK r(z. )

A/ore: ; £/)(Z)MJ>(}) ARd. £LICTRICAL r#A*ts&i/ce.as

rtEfliuRtneNT" ^3)

Mono*/

D£AD- VSCiGHT

f'Q A SKETCH OF resr APPARATUS

r M ""Si

I T ,

O •o *si

»o

I ± ' ©

L 0tJS*7d %3V

t.

~l

tsj

>

X

i

vs

I i .

L z'o^j>/6v

L

VI

VJ

k o k «J

ft! k

*

?W7<S %p

L

~1

0.3

0.8

0.7

o.fe

««• 0.5 v

\ fX »

DM

0.1

0.2

û.l

± •

l B

1 1 •

e *

o

• •

0,\ 0,1 O.Z O.lt A AQ/<Ty 0.2 s 4 m 4<?/îTy fl.2: 2

0.S 0.Ù ù.l O.b £7,9 1

P + AQ

F/ç S SU L XzsuLTS or C£fl resrs

u 0.9

0 3

0.7

; . f e

os

C,M

• ;>.

o.i

~i

• — — — —————————— ——— — — — — —— ^

0 OJ o,1 O.l OM O.S 0.6 0.7 0.9 Û.9 i.O

SR FrG 6 DErâ.x.r?,/>//) r/CAf OF £FFtc£vcy woe* V

L

1

ci

V' o>

o,s

Cl

0,4

0 A y» o

v Y • O » e A

O o u » œ I

A T • A

v ] i r

\ ' > •

V 0 A

\ A

• A

*Jb \f*0 \ ^/

o

V

o, 1

o A A V T O

°, s Ql 0,1 0,V

££V9 TCSTS 3>16 C ce* resrs ZOQL T. U G* resrs j U r y r . r s

^/.r^^iov z™râsrs T, l/ôOC<JC/f TEiTi

j , M cofiun i £* rs X. /A/OI/C resrs

o,6 °.} °/» °,3 - i

L F/$ 7 /?£.&VLTS oF D/FF£#C*JTS nrsn