* * * * * systems included in our fit * ( not shown in the figure) schumann-runge 49356 *
TRANSCRIPT
Global fit of the states of
the six isotopologues of oxygen
Shanshan Yu, Charles E Miller, Brian DrouinJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, USA
Holger MüllerI. Physikalisches Institut, Universität zu Köln, 50937 Köln, Germany
Copyright 2011. All rights reserved.
uggg
BbaX 3113 and,,
Carry out band-band fit for all data to check bad measurements and misassignments
Fit all 16O2 data with the Dunham model (including highly accurate MW transitions) for Extrapolate rotational energies for unobserved vibrational levels
Provide predictions for unobserved bands
Employ mass relationship to add minor isotopologue data to the fit Determine Born-Oppenheimer breakdown parameters
Provide predictions for unobserved isotopologue bands
Derive Dunham-type potentials from obtained parameters
Project procedures and goals
Low-lying electronic states of O2 below 6.1 eV
Figure and table taken from Slanger et al. Chem. Rev. 103, 4733 (2003)
**
***
Systems included in our fit
* ( not shown in the figure)
Schumann-Runge 49356
*
16O16O 5 electronic states; v=0-29 for each electronic state Total 150 vibrational quanta Total 4728 transitions collected for these states
Five minor isotopologues 3 electronic states; v=0-29 for each electronic state Total 450 vibrational quanta Total 4295 transitions collected for these states
SPFIT Vibrational quantum numbers
16O16O 16O17O 16O18O 17O17O 17O18O 18O18OX 3Sg
– V=0-29 0-29 300-329 400-429 500-529 600-629 700-729a 1Dg
V=0-29 30-59 330-359 430-459 530-559 630-659 730-759b 1Sg
+ V=0-29 60-89 360-389 460-489 560-589 660-689 760-789B 3Su
– V=0-29 100-129 A’ 3Du
V=0-29 130-159
13031 61
Lab data
Levels and transitions for 16O16O
X 3Sg–
3938373635343332
40
a 1Dg
118117116115114113112111110109108107106105104103102101100
B 3Su–
139138137136135134133132131130
7574737271706968676665646362
60
18171615141312111098765432
b 1Sg+ A’ 3Du
V=0
MW&IR data available
IR data unconnected to the rest levels
Limited rotational levels observed
UV data with fine structures unresolved
IR or UV data available
Nightglow data Bad data
Chamberlain26346 cm-1
Schumann-Runge
49356 cm-1Atmospheric13122 cm-1
Noxon5233 cm-1
Herzberg III34387 cm-1
IR atmospheric7889 cm-1
700701
600
500
400
300
a 1Dg b 1Sg+ X 3Sg
–
530531
533532
563562561560
503502501
16O17O
a 1Dg b 1Sg+ X 3Sg
–
330331
333332
363362361360
303302301
16O17O
430431
433432
463462461460
403402401
16O18O630631
633632
663662661660
603602601
17O18O
730731
733732
763762761760
703702
18O18O
Levels and transitions for minor isotopologues
MW&IR data available
Solar data
Lab data
Rotational parameters are expanded in (N(N+1) - l2)
1
1
1
1
1
Mass(u) 16O 15.994 914 619 56(16) AME200317O 16.999 131 756 6(9) Phys. Rev. A 81, 064501 (2010)18O 17.999 159 613 0(13) Phys. Rev. A 79, 012507 (2009)
Dunham-type expansions
Parameter Identifier
Parameter ValueParameter
UncertaintyComments
0 23683467.0956274 1.00E+37 /16O16O Y1,0/2
-1001 71050401.2868814 1.00E-37 /*3-2002 118417335.4781370 1.00E-37 /*5-3003 165784269.6693910 1.00E-37 /*7-4004 213151203.8606470 1.00E-37 /*9-5005 260518138.0519010 1.00E-37 /*11-6006 307885072.2431550 1.00E-37 /*13-7007 355252006.4344090 1.00E-37 /*15-8008 402618940.6256630 1.00E-37 /*17-9009 449985874.8169180 1.00E-37 /*19
-10010 497352809.0081710 1.00E-37 /*21-11011 544719743.1994260 1.00E-37 /*23-12012 592086677.3906790 1.00E-37 /*25-13013 639453611.5819330 1.00E-37 /*27-14014 686820545.7731870 1.00E-37 /*29-15015 734187479.9644420 1.00E-37 /*31-16016 781554414.1556970 1.00E-37 /*33
…
Parameter Identifier
Parameter ValueParameter
UncertaintyComments
0 23683467.0956274 1.00E+37 /16O16O Y1,0/2
-1001 71050401.2868814 1.00E-37 /*3-2002 118417335.4781370 1.00E-37 /*5
…
-300300 23331072.4780496 1.00E-37 /16O17O Y1,0/2
-301301 69993217.4341492 1.00E-37 /*3…
-400400 23014724.3513394 1.00E-37 /16O18O Y1,0/2
-401401 69044173.0540186 1.00E-37 /*3…
-500500 22973272.9989080 1.00E-37 /17O17O Y1,0/2
-501501 68919818.9967241 1.00E-37 /*3…
-600600 22651928.5332284 1.00E-37 /17O18O Y1,0/2
-601601 67955785.5996850 1.00E-37 /*3…
-700700 22325959.3358630 1.00E-37 /18O18O Y1,0/2
-701701 66977878.0075893 1.00E-37 /*3…
O2 ground state Y1,0(V+1/2) expansion
17O hyperfine structure (hfs) parameters
5 hfs parameters can be determined a, bF, c, eQq1: mass independent
CI : m-1
hfs parameters excluded when fitting hfs unresolved lines
Itot basis used for 17O17O
989100 989150 989200989100 989150 989200Frequency (M H z)
x5
989100 989150 989200
Results before and after our global fit
16O17O a 1Dg V=0, J = 12 ← 11, DF = DJ = +1 (left) DF = 0 (inset). The I = 5/2 nuclear spin of 17O splits the DF = 1 transitions into a sextuplet and the DF = 0 into a pentuplet.
(Vmax=18) (Vmax=10) (Vmax=12)
Te 0 237576991( 33) 395594758(150)
Te(BOB) 0 8919( 50) 25636(151)
Y1,0/2 23683467(169) 22625647(178) 21474459( 75)
Y1,0(BOB)/2 1561(169) 1543(172) 1040( 74)
Y2,0/4 -89235.0( 38) -98161.6(262) -104788.2( 93)
Y3,0/8 126.30( 44) 74.45(239) 23.68( 89)
Y4,0/16 -0.8113(184) -3.700( 64) -4.4950(236)
Y5,0/32 -0.015451(245)
Obtained values (MHz) for 16O2 Yl,0
Y0,1 43343.5189(131) 42766.691( 65) 41988.255( 68)
Y0,1(BOB) -5.1403( 99) -4.734( 33) -6.084( 34)
Y1,1/2 -238.2570(202) -256.968(130) -273.410(104)
Y2,1/4 0.3301( 49) 0.163( 39) -0.1161(172)
Y3,1/8 -6.192(100)E-03 -0.01760(200) -0.01867( 71)
Y0,2 -0.1452056(100) -0.1526708(154) -0.160518( 70)
Y1,2/2 0.0779(127)E-03 -0.3032(149)E-03 -0.506( 71)E-03
Y2,2/4 -0.01710(312)E-03
Y0,3 0.0819( 34)E-06
Obtained values (MHz) for 16O2 Yl,1, Yl,2, Yl,3
l0,0237713.386( 88) g0,0 -252.28957( 68)
l0,0(BOB) 27.425( 53) g0,0(BOB) 0.01019( 72)
l1,0/2 256.274(114) g1,0/2 -0.306501( 56)
l2,0/4 8.2969(295) g0,1 -0.245505(116)E-03
l0,1 0.218066(163)
l0,1(BOB) 5.570(175)E-03
l1,1/2 9.7568(188)E-03
l0,2 1.2600(219)E-06
Obtained values (MHz) for 16O2 ll,m and gl,m
9023 transitions collected and fitted for O2 (8840 fitted to 3 , swith a reduced RMS=1.04 )
111 independent parameters (12021 parameters defined) determined for fives electronic states of six O2 isotopologues
600 vibrational states calculated
modeled well with Dunham model
not modeled well with Dunham model; now modeled with band-by-band parameters
High vibration excitation lab data needed to replace nightglow data for b-X
b(1)-X(1) or a(0)-X(1) isotopologue transitions needed to clarify the existing problem fitting 17O18O X(1)-X(0) data
Conclusions
Fit statistics on Edwards et al., 1976, 1978,1981
Band#
bad lines
# good lines
N' srmsrms(cm-1)
AVG (cm-1)
P (Torr)
Shift (cm-1)
16O17O 0-0 4 50 3-20 1.767 0.009 0.002 300
16O18O 0-0 4 43 3-20 2.381 0.012 -0.009 750
17O17O 0-0 4 53 3-21 1.788 0.009 -0.002 300
18O18O 0-0 2 42 3-31 1.630 0.008 0.000 750
16O16O 1-0 1 69 1-19 0.911 0.014 -0.010 550
17O17O 1-0 3 61 1-13 2.230 0.033 -0.031 550
17O18O 1-0 75 0 1-17 12.290 0.184 0.182 55018O18O 1-0 6 70 1-19 1.027 0.015 0.006 550
Fit statistics on 16O16O b-X lab data
Reference#
bad lines
# good lines
N' srmsrms(cm-1)
AVG (cm-1)
P (Torr)
Shift (cm-1)
0-0, Robichaud et al. , 2008 2 30 2-30 1.364 0.000 0.000 0
0-0, Brown et al., 2000 0 44 0-22 0.830 0.001 0.000 4 -
0.0006
0-0, Cheah et al., 2000 4 57 0-30 0.594 0.006 -0.002 0 0.0014
0-0, O'Brien et al., 2001 2 34 22-40 1.149 0.006 0.002 0.8
0-0, van Leeuwen et al., 2004 0 12 34-44 0.683 0.014 -0.011 300
1-1, van Leeuwen et al., 2004 1 58 0-32 0.532 0.011 -0.003 300
1-0, Cheah et al., 2000 1 57 0-30 0.420 0.005 0.000 0
2-0 Naus et al., 1999 0 49 0-26 0.906 0.009 0.001 60
2-0, Cheah et al., 2000 1 43 0-24 1.108 0.012 0.008 0
3-0, Biennier et al., 1998 1 42 0-24 1.225 0.013 0.006 600
3-0, Naus et al., 1999 1 42 0-22 1.444 0.010 -0.008 183
Fit statistics on 16O16O ground state MW lab data
Reference#
bad lines
# good lines
N' srmsrms(MH
z)AVG
(MHz) P
(Torr)
V=0, Endo et al., 1982 0 8 31-39 1.140 0.031 -0.031
V=1 Endo et al., 1982 0 19 1-19 0.889 0.016 0.002
V=0, Zink & Mizushima, 1987 1 4 5-15 2.063 0.185 0.116
V=0 Brown et al., 1992 (CARS) 0 30 3-21 0.173 25.905 12.677 70
V=0, Park et al., 1996 1 1 9,15 0.395 0.015 0.015
V=0, Golubiatnikov et al., 2003 0 8 3-7 1.221 0.024 -0.010
V=0, Tretyakov et al., 2005 0 27 1-27 0.694 0.005 0.000
V=0, Drouin et al., 2010 0 5 5-11 0.835 0.033 -0.017
Fit statistics on 16O16O b-X nightglow (Cosby2006)
Band# bad lines
# good lines
N' srmsrms
(cm-1)AVG (cm-1)
0-0 0 8 28-40 0.884 0.088 0.0370-1 0 42 0-24 0.903 0.090 0.0891-1 0 52 2-34 1.195 0.120 0.0802-1 0 27 2-18 1.215 0.122 0.1043-1 0 1 10 0.815 0.082 0.0820-2 0 3 2-8 0.345 0.034 0.0252-2 0 37 0-20 1.040 0.104 0.0873-2 0 39 0-20 1.070 0.107 0.0944-2 0 1 6 1.777 0.178 0.1782-3 0 5 4-10 0.875 0.087 0.0783-3 0 31 0-20 0.870 0.087 0.0774-3 0 39 0-24 0.764 0.076 0.0505-3 0 4 4-14 0.965 0.096 0.0393-4 0 29 0-18 0.682 0.068 0.056
…