*1)

.

. :

.

.

. :

.

, .

, . ,

.

.

. , .

,

. ,

.

*

290 49

. .

, .

.

,

.

, , , , , ,

.

.

. .

.

(1501~1570) (1762~1836)

200 .

, , , ,

.

,

.

.

291

.

.

.

. 12

16 ,

.

,

.

,

, .

.

. ,

.

.

,1)

1) , , 26, 1998, 93-120., , 1, 1997, 591-606., , 85, 1995, 34-66.

292 49

.2)

, .

.

,3) .4)

, .

, , 1078, 2000, 215-227.2) , , 3, 1974, 79-144., , 23, 1995,63-81.

, , , 1997., , 11, 2001, 195-224.

3) , , , 1976, 70-76., , 1993., , , 1991, 1-210.

, , , 1994., - 16, 1995, 122-144., , , 2002, 1-262.

4) , , , 1982, 1-112.

, , , 1989, 1-177.

, , , 1990, 1-132.

, , , 1998, 1-185.

293

.5) 6) .

7)

8) .

.

, ,

,

.

. :

.

9) ,

5) , , , 2000, 1-174.

, , , 2004, 1-266.

, : , , 2009, 1-301.

6) , , , , 2007.7) , , 2, 1988, 105-128.8) , , 90,1996, 29-70.

9) : , . , .

294 49

.10) .

.

. , . .

.

.

, .11)

.12)

.

(?~1015) (?~989) ,

(979~1032) (?~1045)

.13) .

10) , , , 2001, 199.11) ,

. .

12) , , , 1991, 212-218 .13) 2 : ,

. , . , ,

.

295

.

,

.14) , . .

, . ,

.

,

.

,

.15) , .16)

14) : , , .15) 76 : , , , ,

, , . , . ,

, , . , . ,

. , , .

16) , .( 6.)

296 49

,

.17)

.

,

.

, , , ,

,18) ,

,

.

. .

.19)

.20)

,

.21) .

17) , , , 2001, 195 .18) , , , 1995. 187-200 .19) : , .20) : , .21) : , , , .

297

,

.

.

. .

,

.

.

,

22)

.

.

.23)

, ,

.24)

22) 67 : , .

23) , .(, 2, 468 .)

24) 38 : , ,

298 49

.

.

.

, ,

, .

,25)

.

.26)

.

,

.

. , ,

. , .

25)

, , 9 . , .( 6 .)

26)

. .

.( , , , , 1995, 200 .)

299

.

.

. .

. .27)

.

.

.

,

.

.28)

.

.29)

27) 24 : , , , ,, .

28) : , . , . , .29) 41 : , , ,

, , , , , . , , , . ,

, , , ,

, , .

300 49

, ,

.

.

.

.

.

.

[ ]

,

,

.30)

. ,

. ,

,

.31)

[, ] ,

30) 29 : , , , , , .

31) 25 : , . , . , , ,

, .

301

.

. ,

, , . , ,

.32)

.

. ,

,

. ,

. 33) . ,

.

,

. ,

.

.

.

32) , , 1, 1997, 601.33) : , , , . ! ,

. , . , (), 26 .

302 49

.

.

.

,

, . ,

. .

,

,

?

,

.

?34)

.

.

.

34) 11 : , , ? , ,

, . ?

303

.

.35)

.

.

, ,

.

.36)

,

. , , , .

, , , 64

.

.

35)

. ,

.

.

36) 2 , .

304 49

.

.

. , , ,

, , , ,

.37)

, ,

, ,

216, 144,

.

.

.

.

,

. ,

.

,

.

37) 2 , , , .

305

. :

.

.

,

.38)

. 1

,

.

.

.

,

.

38) 36 : , , , , , . , , , . .

, ? , . , , , . . ,

, , , ,

, , , . ,

. ( ,

.

, .)

306 49

.39)

.40)

.

, , .

,

.

[]41)

.

.42)

. .

.

.

,

. .

39) 67 : , , , , , . ,

, .

40) 67 : , , , , .

41) 5 : . , .42) , , , 1993, 103

.

307

. ,

.43) 1

, ,

,

, 44).

,

.45)

.

.

?

,

, [] , .

[]

,

.46)

43) , , 22, 178 .

44) 16 : , , , , , , , , .

45) 13 : , .46) 13 : , . ,

. ? ,

, , , .

, . .

308 49

.

.

. ,

, .

.

. 5

,

,

.

,

.

. .

, , .

.

.

.47)

47) 19 : , , , , .

309

. [] ,

.

,

?

,

.

.

.

[], ,

[]

[] .48)

. . ,

. .49) 48) : , , , , ,

, , . , ,

, , . , , , ,

. , , , , . , , , . , , . , ,

. , . , . .

49) 20 : , . ,, . , , ,

.

310 49

.50)

,

.

.

,

.51)

. .

,

. ,

.

.

. .

. .

50) 11 : . . , , .

, , , , .

, , , .

, , , .

51) .( 26 ) .

311

.

.

.

,

.

.

.

, . ,

.

.

, .

,

.

.

.

, .

,

312 49

. ,

.

.

. ,

. ,

.

, .

, , , 1990., , , 1990.(, , , ), , 1982.(), , , 1973.(), , , 1996.(29-31 ), , 1996., , , 1992. , , , , 2007. , , , , 2000., , , 1993. 172-202., , , , 2001. 195-199., 2, , , 1991. 1-680. , , , , 1991. 26-218.

313

, , , , 1995. 187-200., , , 1994. 319-436.

, , 3, 1974. 79-144., , 1, 1997. 591-606., , , 1976. 70-76., , 2, 1988. 105-128., , , 2000. 1-174.

, , , 1989. 1-174.

, , , 1998. 1-177. , , , 1982. 1-117.

, , , 1993, 1-262.

, , 11, 2001. 195-224., , 1078, 2000. 215-227., , 26, 1998. 93-120., , , 2002. 1-262.

, , 85, 1995. 34-66., , , 1991. 1-210.

, , 90, 1996. 29-70.

, , 22,177-210.

, : , , 2009. 1-301.

, - 16, 1995. 122-144.

, , 23, 1995.63-81.

, , , 1990. 1-132.

, , , 1997. 1-98., , , 2004. 1-266.

314 49

Abstract

The Change And Homogeneity Of I-hseh() Between Lee

Whang() And Chng Yag-Yong()

Cho, Jang-Yun

The main purpose of this dissertation is to analyze Homogeneity of

I-hseh() between Lee Whang() and Chng Yag-yong().

There are Two origins in I-ching(), the prime Confucian Classic.

the one is the Theory of Yangguan-Fucha(), and the other is

the Theory of Hetu-Loushu().

Chu Hsi() apprehended I-ching in base of Tushu-Yi(), and

Tushu-Yi was based of the Theory of Hetu-Loushu. The establishment

of an ethical code was his matter of interest, and the principle was

deducted by T'ai-chi() or Li(). Lee Whang() embraceed Chu

Hsi's Tuchu-Yi. But He tightened up the concept of T'ai-chi or Li, and

suggested the proposition of Li-fa(). In his opinion, the Mind()

was a principal agent of awareness that reflected by T'ien-li(), and

the aim of studying I-ching was integrity of the Mind. On the other

hand, Chng Yag-yong() Should overcame Chu Hsi's viepoint of

Tushu-Yi, so he wanted to substitute the Sang-di() with Li in order

to regain the practical Moral principal substitute. Therefore, we can

find that There are homogeneity between Li-fa and Sang-di.

Key WordLee Whang(), Chng Yag-Yong(), the Theory of Yangguan-Fucha

(), the Theory of Hetu-Loushu(), I-hseh(), Tushu-Yi(), Li-fa(), Sang-di()

2011.6.23 2011.8.2 2011.8.5