· web viewcampaign project plan table of contents (once the project plan is complete insert...

Campaign Project Plan Table of Contents(Once the project plan is complete insert page numbers for each section)

A. Executive Summary 1. Introduction - Framing the problem 2. Campaign Theory of Change: a strategy for change - Table and narrative3. Site summary4. Project team & key strategic partners

B. Social marketing profile 1. Formative Research - TWG & Stakeholder meetings consensus workshop outputs; Directed Conversations; FGD; Photo voice2. Concept Model 3. Results Chain 4. Establishing a baseline: quantitative survey 5. Understanding our audience

C. MPA Governance and Management plan (BROP)1. Abstract2. Introduction3. Objectives4. MPA profile5. Action plan6. Funding opportunities

D. Monitoring plan (In excel) SMART objectives for:KAPBR,BC,TRCR

E. Work Plan with Budget (In excel)

2

F. Endorsement of this plan

G. References and Acknowledgements

H. Appendices1. Fisheries profile2. Executive Order for TWG & Mancom3. Survey Questionnaire 4. Survey results5. EcoGov MPA Effectiveness Rating 6. Letters of Support 7. Threat ranking8. Factor chain

3

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction - Framing the problem

Philippines as the centre of the centre of global marine biodiversityScientists refer to the 7,107 islands that make up the Philippines as the “center of the center” of global marine biodiversity. Its waters are home to whales, dolphins, 50 species of sea horses and over 2,000 species fish, including the largest fish in the world, the whale shark. Marine resources are also critical to the food security and livelihoods of Filipinos, as fish provide over 50% of their protein and support the livelihoods of millions of fishers and fish-related industries throughout the country. The Philippines is located in the Coral Triangle, a vast region in Southeast Asia made up of 18,500 islands and 647 million hectares of ocean. It is often referred to as the “nursery of the seas” because of the more than 500 species of coral and hundreds of thousands of hectares of sea grass and coastal mangrove forests that shelter and sustain a level of marine diversity unmatched anywhere on the planet.

Species and Habitat under Complex ThreatsToday, however the global center of marine biodiversity is under extreme pressure. Over 40% of the reef and mangroves in the region have disappeared in the last 40 years. Near-shore overfishing is a serious threat to these natural resources, and reversing the effects will require a significant change in human behavior. Less than five percent of the Philippines’ coral reef ecosystems are still in pristine health, and in some fishing grounds, biomass is less than 10% of what it was 50 years ago. Most near-shore fishing is conducted by subsistence fishers in coastal communities although illegal intrusions by commercial fishers into municipal waters are cause for concern.

A Campaign to Transform the ContextDeveloping local approaches to addressing the threat of overfishing is increasingly recognized as vital to long-term economic and environmental sustainability in the region. The vision behind this plan, and the current cohort of 12 campaign developed under the Rare Pride Program in the Philippines, is to facilitate true community buy and ownership of the local Marine Protected Areas building on the tools developed in 20 years of experience in MPA management in the Philippines and combining it with the Rare

4

Pride Methodology for social marketing. Through this strategy the objective is to get the local fishers population as well as the wider community in the Barangays surrounding the MPA to take ownership in and understand the benefit of no-take-areas and support essential management activities such as enforcement and governance of the MPA.

Cohort Theory of change: a strategy for changeIn order to eliminate the principle threat of overfishing and destructive fishing the governance and enforcement infrastructures of the no-take-zone (NTZ) at 12 sites in the Philippines will be strengthened via a proven self-assessment and planning tool, the Participatory Coastal Resources Assessment tool (PCRA). Key target audiences (local fishers and gleaners; the local community, the MPA enforcement team and local LGU officials) will be informed of the benefits of the No Take Zone (NTZ), the rules of the sanctuary, and the processes for becoming more engaged in the MPA management committee. Fishers and gleaners will come to believe in MPA as a tool for food security, and will support new reporting structures for arrests and prosecution of intruders. The conservation results will include increased perceived fish catch, increases in fish numbers and species richness, increase in invertebrates, and increase in coral reef health.

5

2. Mabaw Reef Campaign Theory of Change

In order to reduce the illegal and destructive fishing activities that caused overfishing and deterioration of coral cover and other marine invertebrates in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary, the community stakeholders will be fully educated on the causes and effects of overfishing and coral deterioration, and the benefits of proper protection and management of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. The community stakeholders will recognize their critical roles and initiate group discussions with other resources users leading towards the creation of a functional community-based multi-sectoral management committee with a high sense of ownership that eventually translates into sustainable protection and management of the no-take zone resulting to increased 5% of coral cover, 10% fish biomass and other marine invertebrates by the end of August 2012.

6

Knowledge Attitude Inter-personal Communication

Barrier Removal

Behavior Change Threat Reduction

Conservation Results

The Taloto and Ubujan resident have increased their knowledge on the benefits of a community-based management of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

The Taloto and Ubujan residents strongly believe that they have important roles in managing the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary which are linked to local government unit and other stakeholders.

The Taloto and Ubujan residents initiate discussion

with the community stakeholders

including of those from nearby

barangays on the benefits of effective

governance and management of Mabaw Marine

Sanctuary.

Functional community-based

multi-sectoral Management

Committee with a strong

coordination of the local residents in

Taloto and Ubujan including those of

the nearby barangays.

The Taloto and Ubujan residents

actively involved in the enforcement

rules and regulations and the

management operations of

Marine Sanctuary.

Reduced illegal and destructive

fishing activities that caused

overfishing and significant

deterioration of coral cover in

Mabaw Mariine Sanctuary.

Increased 5% of coral cover and

increased 10% of fish biomass by

2012.

K + A + IC + BR BC TR CR

Theory of Change narrative:

7

Site summary

Project Name

Project Name The two-year project is called Mabaw Reef Pride Campaign Program.

Project Data Effective Date Project Scope and Vision

Scope/Site Name Mabaw Marine Sanctuary

Scope/Site Description The Mabaw Marine Protected Area is reef located in the City of Tagbilaran of the province of Bohol under the political jurisdiction of Region 7. It is bounded within the northern portion by the municipality of Maribojoc, eastern sections is the municipality of Cortes, southern part is the city of Tagbilaran and in the western part is Cebu City (BFAR, 2004). The Mabaw MPA was discovered and popularized by a group of scientist on a French-led expedition who surveyed the whole Panglao island in they 2004. The resolutions coming the from the Local Government Unit of Manga, Ubujan, and Taloto urged the city government of Tagbilaran to declare the Mabaw Reef as a marine protected area on June 20, 2007 with the support from the fisher communities.

It is a patch reef in the off-shore with declining coral trend from good to fair coral condition. In 2005, Mabaw MPA had a mean live coral cover of 69.47% ( BFAR, 2005). After five years, the live coral cover decreased into 49.93% or fair coral condition (MBEMO, 2009). In 2005, a total of 70 fish species belonging to 17 families were identified and recorded in the reef. Based on the MPA report, the reef targets are gone except for the few numbers of wrasses. Moreover, the scombrids or mackerels were not already seen during the latest monitoring. The needlefishes are also not seen during the survey compared to the previous survey where they have also been spotted on the surface of the reef (MBEMO, 2009).

8

Over-extraction of fish stocks by both resident fisherfolks and non-resident small to medium scale commercial fishers causes the vanishing of target species such as blue and gold fusiliers (Caesio caerulaurea), slender unicorn (Naso minor), mackerel (Ratrilleger kanagurta), multi-barred goatfish (Parupeneus multifasciatus) and white spotted rabbit fish ( Siganus canaliculatus.

Vision Statement Text “A well- management community-based marine sanctuary with a diverse coral cover inhabited by various fish species and marine invertebrates that serve as sources of food and livelihood of the local communities.”

Mission To create and provide policy, technical, logistical and networking support to the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary management committee to contribute towards the effective management of the sanctuary where a management plan is approved and implemented, and enforcement system is in place.

Biodiversity Features

Biodiversity Area 8,339

Biodiversity Background The coastline of Tagbilaran is irregular with a total length of about 13 kilometers. It embraces 8 barangays, stretching from Barangay Bool in the South to Barangay Manga in the North. The other coastal barangays are: ansasa, Poblacion I, Poblacion 3, Cogon, Booy, Taloto and Ubujan. Beaches are predominantly rocky or stony and characteristically narrow and rise abruptly into rocky cliffs. The city is blessed with mangrove with an total of 67 hectares, diverse coral reef, sea grasses and different fish species.

One of the diverse marine habitats in Tagbilaran is the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. It is shallow with a patch reef in the offshore with a total area of 8, 339 square meters, with a 50 meter buffer zone. This is located fronting the barangays of Taloto, Ubujan and Manga.

Protected Area Information

Protected Area Categories Category IV: Habitat/ Species Management Area

9

Category VI: Managed Resource Protected Area

Legal Status The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary is governed by City Ordinance C-204.

Legislative Context The Mabaw Reef was declared as protected area after the local government unit enacted City Ordinance No. C-191 series of 2006. The said ordinance was repealed after the city government enacted the Tagbilaran City Fishery Code of the City Ordinance C-204, series of 2007 incorporating rules and regulations of marine protected areas.The other laws that legally support the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary is the City Environment Code, the Provincial Environment Code of the Province of Bohol, the R.A 7160 also known as the Local Government Code of 1991 which mandates the roles of the local government unit in the management and protection of the environment including the marine environment.

And, the Republic Act 8550 also known as the New Fisheries Code of the Philippines which stated that the municipal/city government shall have jurisdiction over municipal/ city waters. The municipal/city government, in consultation with the FARMC shall be responsible for the management, conservation, development, protection, utilization, and disposition of all fish and fishery/aquatic resources within their respective municipal waters.

Physical Description The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary is located in the center of Maribojoc Bay within the province of Bohol under the political jurisdiction of region 7. It is a patch reef in the offshore with fair to good coral cover. Mabaw Reef MPA has more live hard coral cover on the side facing Cebu island than on the other side facing Cortes. This side of Mabaw Reef is also of a slope characteristic compared to the other side which is steep wall. Erosion is also far more exemplified on this side of the reef.

The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary is vulnerable to illegal fishing activities due to its location and distance from the local communities. Some of these illegal fishing activities include dynamite fishing, fishing with the use of fine mesh-net and poisonous substance and commercial fishing. MPA markers and buoys installed by the city government were intentionally cut by the illegal fishers. Other incident happened allegedly done by the divers was the writing using the hard materials (knife/ pointed) on top of the big table coral.

In 2004 survey, result showed that Mabaw Reef had a mean of 67.74% live hard coral cover, or the reef

10

is in good condition. However, in 2009, Mabaw Reef MPA has more live hard coral cover on the side facing Cebu island with 39% than on the other side facing Cortes which has only 24% cover. Macroalgae cover is also higher on Cortes side of the reef which could be the reason why it has lower percentage of live hard coral. This only means that coral reefs in Mabaw Reef continuously declining.

Overfishing is very evident in Mabaw Reef , the reef targets are gone except for the few numbers of wrasses. Reef associates like that of the fusiliers are still a lot in Mabaw Reef, however, the scombrids or mackerels have not been seen anymore. The needlefishes are also not seen during the survey compared to the previous survey where they have also been spotted on the surface of the reef (MBEMO 2009).

Docoy, M.L, 2009. Maribojoc Bay MPA Report, MBEMO, Tagbilaran City

Biological Description There are eight common species of Acropora found in Mabaw Reef and some them are unknown species of corals. Corals in Mabaw Reef will spawn from May to June. This is according to the survey of UPMSI in the year 2009.

A total of 70 fish species belonging to 17 families were identified and recorded in the Mabaw reef (BFAR, 2005). Reef fishes composed mostly of non-target fish species comprising 85.85% which target is only 13.74% and indicator of only .41%.

Alonzo, N.M, P. Milana, W. Niones & N. Ranay, Baseline Assessment of the Proposed Marine Park at Mabaw Reef. BFAR-7, 2005, Cebu City

Socio-Economic Information The city of Tagbilaran is the main business capital and center of governance of the province of Bohol aside from being the center of education and transportation.

Tagbilaran City has a total of 18,039 households (CHO, 2006). The most densely populated barangays in Tagbilaran City are mostly found in the coastal areas. Sixty-six percent of households earn below Php15,000 per month month, 30% earn not more than Php 10,000, 15% earn between Php20,000 and

11

Php35,000, and about 8% earn more than Php 35,000 (based on the 1995 NCSO population data of 12,428 households). The average monthly income of family households is pegged at Php12,900 while the median family household income is pegged at Php12, 700. According to LPRAP Summary of Survey Results, of the 15,114 households surveyed in 2004, 4,360 or 28.85% of the household live below the income threshold. As per the City’s Local Poverty Reduction Action Program (LPRAP) Summary of Survey Results of 2004, about 16.93% of the labor force is unemployed.

Most of the residents especially the fishers in the areas of Taloto, Ubujan and Manga are engaged in fishing related activities, business ( mini store, selling snacks and food, and buy-and-sell), farming, skilled labor and unskilled labor Maribojoc Bay Profile, 2000).

Hamoay, G.S.B. and M.C.G. Jabines, Maribojoc Bay Profile. PROCESS, Inc. Tagbilaran City

Historical Description The Mabaw reef is a favorite fishing ground of the marginal fishers of Tagbilaran and the fishers coming from the neighboring municipalities until at present. This was discovered and popularized by the group of foreign scientists who took invertebrates survey in 2004 as part of the Panglao 2004 Project. The marine scientist’s recommendation to declare the Mabaw Reef as a marine sanctuary urged the city government and the local communities along Taloto, Ubujan and Manga.

The Mabaw reef was declared as a Marine Sanctuary in ______2006 by the city government under City Ordinance C-191. The Mabaw Reef is coined from the term “ Mabaw” meaning shallow. It is a productive fishing ground for small fishermen in Tagbilaran and neighboring municipalities.

Cultural Description Tagbilaran was a small, advanced and civilized settlement established at Sitio Ubos, the lower portion at the back of the present Cathedral in Poblacion Uno, during the 15th Century. This settlement was then known as the “Bool Kingdom,” a part of the town of Baclayon. It is said that the place was first named Tinabilan, which means screened," as she is shielded on the southwest by Panglao Island. But tradition has it that the word Tagbilaran was derived from the word Tagubilaan, a contraction from two local dialects Tagu (to hide) and Bilaan (a Muslim marauder tribe or Moros) who were feared by the early settlers because they pillaged and looted the place. In brief, Tagbilaran means “to hide from the Moros.”

12

The early settlers of Tagbilaran had established trade relations with China and Malaysia. When Spanish Captain Miguel Lopez de Legaspi landed on the shores of Tagbilaran on 16 March 1565, he forged a Treaty of Friendship with local Chieftain Datu Sikatuna. This event became the basis for the annual celebration called “Sandugo” or literally “one blood.” A historical marker now stands on the very spot where Legaspi and Sikatuna had the famous blood compact. The late President Elpidio Quirino perpetuated the memory and spirit of this treaty by establishing the “Order of Sikatuna,” a presidential award and decoration conferred upon visiting dignitaries.

The Hispanic influences are most evident in literature, folk music, folk dance, language, food, art, and religion. The tradition exhibits festivities known as Barrio fiestas to commemorate their patron saints are very much observed in Tagbilaran particularly in the three concernd barangays.

http://www.fukuoka.unhabitat.org/programmes/scp/philippines/pdf/Tagbilaran_Environmnetal_Profile-SCP-LEPM.pdf

Access Information Mabaw Reef is located in the center of Maribojoc Bay. It is about 3 kilometers from the shoreline of Barangay Manga, Tagbilaran City and about 5 kilometer from port of K of C. It would take 20-30 minutes travel by pump boat.

Visitation Information Intended visits to Mabaw Marine Sanctuary must be coordinated with the City Government through the City Agriculture Office. The City Agriculture Office would arrange any of two barangays ( Taloto and Ubujan) for possible boat access that will take the visitors to and from the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. The best person to coordinate in any visit to Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in the barangay level is the barangay captain of the said barangays.

Current uses of the MPA and adjacent coastline

Of the 3,270 hectares total land area of Tagbilaran, about 2,669.95 hectares or 81.64 percent constitute settlements and built-up areas (2,048.67 hectares are residential; 427.96 hectares are commercial;80.13 hectares are for institutional uses; 86.22 hectares are industrial). Among the major uses include fish port, airport, hotels and tourist accommodations, schools and the proposed waste water facility.

Management Resources A Marine Protected Area Management Council (MPAMC) shall be created, empowered and funded and

13



whose initial function is the creation of the Marine Protected Area Management Plan (MPA/MP). The MPAMC shall be composed of a multi-sectoral management body which shall ensure proper and responsible planning, management and enforcement of the Mabaw Reef Marine Sanctuary and other future sanctuaries when needed. The MPAMC will meet regularly and organize the following committees within its body: Enforcement Committee, Information and Education Committees, Monitoring and Evaluation Committees, Livelihood Development Committee, Committee on Financial Sustainability, Maintenance Committee and other committees that may be deemed necessary by the Council.

The City government, in coordination with the Barangay Council of Ubujan, CFARMC, CAO and concerned people’s organization, shall supervise the management of the Mabaw Reef Marine Sanctuary. The enforcement of this Mabaw Reef MPA shall be under the Mayor’s Office in coordination with the following: City Agriculture Office; City Planning and Development Office;City Treasurer’s Office; Barangay Councils of Manga, Taloto and Ubujan; Barangay Tanods of Manga, Taloto and Ubujan; Deputized Fish Wardens; Philippine National Police; Maritime Police; Marine Protected Area Management Council (MPAMC).

IUCN Red-list Species

Red-List Species Sea turtle

Other Notable Species

Other Notable Species Acanthuridae NasoEpinephelenaeGramnistinaeLutjanidea Macolor

14

Mullidae ParupeneusScaridae ScarusScaridae ChlorurusScombridaeSiganidae Siganus

Location and Topography

MPA Latitude 93859.41

MPA Longitude 1235057.8

Country Philippines

States/Provinces Province of Bohol

Municipalities City of Tagbilaran

Legislative Districts First Congressional District

Location Details Tagbilaran is the capital and a component city of the Province of Bohol. It is situated 630 kilometer southeast of Manila and 72 kilometers south of Cebu City . It lies on the southwestern part of the province. Its local geology is dominated by Miocene to Pleistocene limestones. Locally, the geology is dominated by the Pliocene-Pleistocene Marijoboc Limestone, generally flat lying, highly porous, and very poorly bedded to massive, chalky, and in some places highly coralline. This formation has well developed solution features characterized by numerous sinkholes, caves and caverns (karstification). Surface soils are derived from residual weathering of the underlying limestone.

Site Map Reference http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=9.661118,123.781374&spn=0.134028,0.336113&t=f&z=12&ecpose=9.66111787,123.78137351,26704.9,-45.819,0,0

Comments

15

Human Stakeholders

Human Stakeholder Population Size

The total coastal population of Tagbilaran is 91,218. The total population of the three barangays constitutes 18.7% ( 17,132) of the entire coastal population.

Social Context The barangay of Taloto has a population of 6,176 and Ubujan has a total population of 4,875. The barangay Taloto has six puroks and barangay Ubujan (CPDO, 2010). Based on the KAP survey conducted, fishers in Mabaw reefs communities (Taloto and Ubujan) fall under ages 45 to 49, followed by 50 to 54 and 40 to 44. A few of the fishers were ages 15 to 19 and 20- 24. Most of the fishers along Mabaw Communities finished elementary. Others have finished the secondary level and college level. A few of them graduated college.

Most of the fishers have 5-6 family members. There were also fishers who reach 8 to 10 family members. Fishing is the main livelihood of most of the coastal residents in the Maribojoc Bay. People speak Visayan (Cebuano) dialect. Most of the fisher’s annual income is between PhP30,000 to PhP50,000. Most of them said that 21-40% of their income derived from fishing. And, some of them said 81-100% derived from the same livelihood.

Rare Pride Campaign

Threats addressed by campaign OverfishingOther threats at site Intrusion of illegal fishersNumber of communities in campaign area

Barangay Taloto and Ubujan: Focus communitiesBarangay Manga and Booy: Extension communities

Target audiences Primary Audiences: TA 1A (Taloto resident fishers), TA 1B (Ubujan resident fishers), TA 2A ( Taloto local community), TA 2B (Ubujan local community)

Secondary Audiences: TA 3 (Management committee), TA 4A (Manga resident fishers), TA 4B ( Booy resident fishers), TA 5 (City officials and employees)

16

Biodiversity area (ha) 8,339Habitat CoralBiodiversity hotspot(s) Coral triangleFlagship species common name ClownfishFlagship species scientific name Amphiprion perculaFlagship species details (<200 words) Brief description and why it was chosenCampaign ambassador Alejandro Ilagan Atienza aka Kuya Kim Cohort ambassador

17

3. Project team and stakeholders

Lead Agency and Pride Conservation Fellow

The Maribojoc Bay Resource Management Board (MBRMB) was created by virtue of an Executive Order No.23 series of 2005 issued by the Hon. Erico B. Aumentado, the provincial governor of Bohol. The EO was reinforced by a Memorandum of Agreement signed by the component local government units in 2006. The city government of Tagbilaran, thru the Hon. Dan Neri Lim chaired the management board. The Maribojoc Bay Executive Management Office (MBEMO), an inter-LGU operations unit, was created in 2007 to implement the program and projects of the management board stipulated in the 10-year Maribojoc Bay Integrated Resource Management Plan.

The Maribojoc Bay Resource Management Board through the MBEMO and the City Government of Tagbilaran forged partnership through a Memorandum of Understanding with RARE in 2010 to pursue a conservation partnership called the Mabaw Reef Pride Campaign Program. Under the Fisheries Management Component of the 10-year Master Plan, this is considered as the first project in the operations of the Maribojoc Bay LGU alliance. To ensure that project’s critical results will be achieved, key individuals are chosen to provide technical and administrative support in running the two-year Mabaw Reef Pride Campaign Program.

#Name Position Organization Contact details

Role in relation to campaign

1Jovenal G. Edquilag Executive Director

Maribojoc Bay Executive Management Office

(038) 411-2264 Conservation Fellow

2

Emilia M. Roslinda Executive Director

PROCESS-Bohol, Inc.Member of the Board- Maribojoc Bay Resource Management Board

(038) 416- 0067; 500-1992

Supervisor on MBEMO Affairs and Advocacy

3 Eduardo C. Macalandag OIC- City City Government of (038) 411-2264 Supervisor on MPA

18

Administrator Tagbilaran Governance and Management

4 Atty. Nerio D. Zamora City Councilor City Government of Tagbilaran

Supervisor on Social Marketing

Strategic partners/key stakeholders

No. Name Position Organization Contact detailsRole in relation to

campaign1. HON. DONI D. PIQUERO

SP Member, Committee Chair on Environment

City Government of Tagbilaran 09209100772 TWG Chairperson

2. HON. GENESYL L. BALBIN SP, Committee Chair on Fishery

City Government of Tagbilaran 09155745080 TWG Secretary

3. PERLITA V. PALEN, DPACity Agriculturist

City Government of Tagbilaran 411-2999 TWG Member

4.

MR. SERVANDO TOLEDOCFARMC Chairperson

City Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council

09264134186 TWG Member

5.FOR. NESTOR CANDA PENRO, DENR-

Bohol

Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Bohol

411-4278 TWG Member

6. MR. CRESENCIO PAHAMUTANG Provincial Fishery

Officer, BFAR- Bohol

Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources

501-7881 TWG Member

7. HON. TIMOTEO MAGLAHUS Ubujan Barangay Local Government 09064516611 TWG Member

19

Captain of Ubujan8. HON. FARO CABALIT Taloto Barangay

CaptainLocal Government of Taloto 09173040503 TWG Member

14. FR. FRANCISCO ESTEPAPresident

Holy Name University c/o


16. P/INPS JOSE B. LOS BANOS Station Chief Phil. Maritime Police TWG Member

17. PSUPT JULIUS CESAR V. GORNEZ Chief of Police

Tagbilaran City Police Office TWG Member

18. HON. EUTORGIO TELMO Punong Barangay Local Government Unit Bool TWG Member

19.JERSON MONTON President Basak Fishermen

Assciation09393454485

20

C. MPA Governance and Management plan (BROP)

1.Abstract

The province of Bohol is among the provinces in the Philippines that considered marine protected area as an important strategy in fisheries conservation. Presently, there are 159 MPAs that surround the province managed through various level and approaches. Being considered as the best practice in the field of coastal resource management, the concept of locally managed protected area is cascaded into the development podium of the local government unit. In fact, the establishment of an MPA has become the basis of cooperation in the aspect of conservation between and among barangay, municipal and provincial local government units. The single resources system management approach in Maribojoc Bay is hastened is a strategy to augment, if not, maintain the resource economic value of the coral reef that accounts for PhP43.1 million per year (US 898, 916.6). In fact, the bay hosts a total of nine (9) marine protected areas (MPAs) declared through a local ordinance and one of which is the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary, located at the heart of Maribojoc Bay.

The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary was established in 2006 through a City Ordinance No. 191. After its declaration, the need to strengthen the management and governance is a challenged faced by the City Government. Nevertheless, this remains a present challenge. Based on the KAP survey, only 15% of the resident fishers in Taloto and Ubujan who have heard of anyone taking part of the activities relation to Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. In addition, only 13.7% of the total fishers respondents from barangay Manga, Ubujan, Taloto and Booy who have heard of anyone reporting intrusion incidents in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. This is in consonance with the apprehension reports from the bantay dagat assigned in the area. This situation can be interpreted that communities along

21

Mabaw Marine Sactuary are not aware of critical roles in the management of the no-take zone. Secondly, the reports from bantay dagat showed intrusion incidences in Mabaw Reef. This can also be attributed to the bio-physical survey results which pointed out some manifestation of illegal activities inside the Mabaw Reef. Some of those are apprehended, some are not. Hence, it can also be said that a number of fishers have a low knowledge on the rules and regulations governing the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

Crucial to improving the state of the marine resources in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary is to strengthen the management and governance system. This manner can steer harmonization of local cooperation geared towards community-based management of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. The diagnostic process through PCRA and the organizational assessment are essential tools that dig up issues and problems for an immediate action. The MPA Management and Governance Plan is a blue-print that would serve as a covenant for the management committee on how Mabaw Marine Sanctuary can be best managed. This plan will not only stipulate necessary actions to take, but it also guides local resource managers to take advantage in pooling resources from different sources to sustain the management of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

2. Introduction

The Mabaw Marine Protected Area is an off-shore reef located in the City of Tagbilaran of the province of Bohol under the political jurisdiction of Region 7. It is bounded within the northern portion by the municipality of Maribojoc, eastern sections is the municipality of Cortes, southern part is the city of Tagbilaran and in the western part is Cebu City (BFAR, 2004). The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary was discovered and popularized by a group of scientist on a French-led expedition who surveyed the whole Panglao island. It was declared as protected area after the local government unit enacted the City Ordinance No. C-204, series of 2007 also known as Tagbilaran City Fishery Code.

The City Government envisions Tagbilaran as a highly livable city in the Philippines. This compels all local development plans including the Coastal Resource Management Plan align toward achieving such future state. In the current Public Governance Strategy Road Map of Tagbilaran, marine conservation is given a priority showcasing marine protected area as vehicle of change the condition of the marine resources,thus, the Mabaw Reef Sanctuary Pride Campaign Program.

22

The Mabaw Reef Pride Campaign Program is embellished to seek changes of the way local communities especially the fishers perceived marine conservation. Through Social Marketing that employ state-of-the-art communication tools, is aimed at changing the ways and practices of the key stakeholders on the utilization of the fisheries resources. Some malpractices include intrusion to the MPA core zone, fishing with the use of any prohibited gears, and the like. These formidable problems are attributed to human behavior that Social Marketing hopes to translate positive behavior change. The MPA management and governance plan is in parallel with the Social Marketing plan in running the two-year pride campaign program to reinforce positive behavior change and embrace the concept of MPA.

3. Objectives and ScopeIn order to respond the emerging needs of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary, the Management and Governance Plan is designed to:

To improve MPA enforcement processes by November 2011 through stabling a guardhouse, enforcement, protocols/plans, intelligence network and communication and logbook system.

To improve MPA governance system by November 2011 through regular meeting, increase membership, documentation, management planning, evaluation, monitoring team.

Improve MPA effectiveness rating from level 1 rated in May 2011 to level 3 [enforced] by June 2012.

23

4.Tools

Developing the a comprehensive Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management and Governance Plan, the tools employed included Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment (PCRA) tools; an MPA effectiveness rating workshop and a Technical Working Group (TWG) and Management Committee (ManCom) Organizational Development ( OD) and planning workshops. Three participatory assessment methods were used to assess current status of fisheries, management performance and community knowledge and practices namely Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment (PCRA), TWG and ManCom OD and planning workshops and KAP survey.

1. PCRA is a critical assessment tool that takes into account the community as the main source of information and data gatherers. It has been widely used in the Philippines since the birth of community-based resource management projects in over 3 decades now. This tool generated a whole suite of focused group discussions [FGDs] not limited to fishery enforcement, resource map, MPA history and etc. The objective of which is to improve community buy-in right at start of project and understand the fishery status in the locality.

2. MPA effectiveness rating system is a self-assessment tool initiated by CCEF and modified by EcoGov to determine management performance of MPA. It is a system that came about to address the need to improve the overall quality of management-since most MPA face difficulty in enforcement due to poverty and general lack of awareness about the coastal environment. This rating was administered on April 14-15, 2011 with the potential members of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Team. This tool generated conclusions on management status and management focus, collated documents supporting rating, and basis for planning.

3. Organizational development is a conceptual, organization-wide effort to increase an organizations effectiveness and viability through an external facilitator. In our case, we employed OD to assess the local organizations i.e. the TWG and ManCom vis a

24

vis MPA management on separate dates. This workshops generated action plan focusing on improving organizational performance and strengthening for improve MPA governance and enforcement.

25

5.MPA profile MPA history, resource use and enforcement

1. PCRA

a. FGD on Enforcement

The Mabaw Reef is the common fishing ground for any types of fishers before it was declared as a protected area. Aside from the fishers coming from the Maribojoc Bay, some fishers coming the other municipalities in the province and even from the province of Cebu came to fish in Mabaw Reef. Since _____, a total violations in Mabaw Reef reported by the Bantay Dagat had reached to _______ . ____ of these were merely sightings and testimonies by local fisherfolks after the incidents took place, _____ of these violations were penalized based on the existing ordinance, and there was no apprehension being filed in court. Most of these violations include compressor fishing, gill net fishing, installation of fish aggregating device such as fish pots and fish traps.

The dynamite fishing is another issue which enrages the resident fisherfolks. During the PCRA focus group discussion, most fishermen said that the culprit are difficult to apprehend because they established an “ unholy alliance” with some of the officials and coastal law enforcers who are bribed with generous amounts of highest-quality fish. The unregulated recreational diving by nearby diveshops is another concern on coastal law enforcement. Divers irresponsibly anchor their boats to any parts of the reef without considering the damage aggravated to the coral reefs.

The resident fishers from Manga, Ubujan, Taloto and Booy expressed anger by the invasion of subsistence fishing, small scale to medium scale commercial fishers in Mabaw Reef especially during special holidays. On the other hand, the OIC City Administrator Eduardo C. Macalandag during the TWG Organizational Diagnosis and Planning Workshop said that the benefits from having the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary is not evident yet, since the management and governance is not fully operational. Although the city government of Tagbilaran poured out resources to pursue coastal law enforcement, some fishermen still complained that intrusion incidences took place in the NTZ especially during the absence of the Bantay Dagat. Thus, a strong enforcement of Mabaw MS rules and regulations must be topmost consideration.

Year Number of Types/forms Intruders (from Course/s of Forms of Remarks

26

infringement

of infringement/gears used

where, who, age group)

action taken (apprehension, affidavit writing, litigation, imprisonment)

incentives/disincentives

Year 1 – 2006 (After MPA establishment)

2x/mo.every night

Dynamite fishingCompressor

Tangke, Cebu; Sta. RosaBadjao, Cebu, Ubay,Bien Unido

Reported to Brgy. Capt., PNP- do -

300.00/mo./fish warden

Case filed in court; violator on bail

Year 2 - 2007 once a monthevery night

dynamite fishingcompressor

Cebu, Badjao Reported to PNP

Disincentive Change administration

Year 3 - 2008

every night compressor Badjao, Ubay, Cebu, Talibon, Getafe

Reported to PNP


5 members/team inc. PNP

Year 4 - 2009

every night compressor Badjao, Ubay, Cebu, Talibon, Getafe

Reported to Brgy. Capt., PNP


Administrative penalty

Year 5 - 2010

every night compressor; koskos

Badjao, Ubay, Cebu, Talibon, Getafe




Year 6 - 2011

every night compressor; koskos; pana, fish aggregating device, diving without permit

Badjao, Ubay, CebuTalibon, Getafe




27

b. FGD on MPA Management History

The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary is vulnerable to illegal activities due to its location and the distance from the local communities. Cruelties to the coral reef were observed when somebody wrote his name using the pointed tool on top of the big table coral; the same coral reef was turned into pieces after it was blasted by a dynamite fisher; a sack of stones was dropped on the slope of the reef and got caught in the coral colonies; fish traps were also seen on the side of the reef slope and; markers and buoys installed by the city government were intentionally cut by the illegal fishers. These are some of the management problems that call utmost attention to prevent these problems from repetition.

Since the declaration of Mabaw Reef as the third marine sanctuary in Tagbilaran City in 2006, installation of boundary markers and the deployment of enforcement team were set up by the City Government to address illegal fishing in the area. Moreover, the Mabaw Reef rules and regulations were integrated to the Tagbilaran City Fishery Code also known as the City Ordinance C-204 to reinforce full protection. Furthermore, a 1-unit speedboat was procured to beef-up enforcement operations and to ensure captivity of those who fish in the no-take zone. In terms of management efforts, it can also be said that the local government unit have poured out resources, however, it seems management tweak must be done to improve the management practices and eventually eliminate the violations in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

Table: Management TimelineYears Project or Event Goals Responsible Implementing

PartyOutcome

2004 Provision of livelihood Projects, training for the POs

Strengthening the participation of the fishers in integrated baywide management

PROCESS- Bohol Organization of fisherfolks in the Maribojoc Bay including Pos in Tagbilaran.

28

Panglao 2004 Project To discover mollusk and other invertibrates in the Panglao Island

Provincial Government & French researcher Dr. Philippe Bouchet, a senior professor at The National Museum of Natural History in cooperation with Dr. Danilo Largo of the University of San Carlos, Cebu

Discover new organism along the survey area; discovered Mabaw reef and recommend for protection.

2005 Conduct initial underwater monitoring in Mabaw reef

To determine the coral status of Mabaw reef

PROCESS-Bohol and the City Agriculture Office

Hydro-biophysical survey( Note: Underwater monitoring was done annually)

2006 Conduct underwater monitoring with the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources and the Department of Environment and Natural Resource

Come-up with a baseline data on the state of marine resources

City Government, BFAR, DENR and PROCESS

Baseline data on the state of the coral reef in Mabaw Reef was submitted to the CLGU for legislative reference.

Signing of MOA for the creation of the Maribojoc Bay Resource Management Board and the adoption of the 10-year Maribojoc Bay Integrated Resource Management Plan

Formalize baywide management

MACOTAPADA IFARMC, PROCESS- BOHOL

Creation of the Maribojoc Bay Executive Management Office as the operations unit of the component LGUs.

Declaration of Mabaw Reef as a marine protected area

Study tour to Gilutungan Island

Full protection of the resources in Mabaw Reef

City LGU & PROCESS City Ordinance C-191

Installed buoys and markers

2007 Enactment of the City Fishery Code of 2007 Integration of all policies, rules and regulation in the city of Tagbilaran

CLGU Integration of Mabaw rules and regulations to the City Fishery Code

29

2008 Procurement of the Speedboat Sea-borne patrol operations

CLGU Warned illegal fishers; apprehension of illegal fishers

2009 Facilitated the conduct of the comparative survey on coral reef in the Bohol (Mabaw Reef) and Bolinao in Panggasinan on March 6, 2009.

Comparative study on coral reproduction

UPMSI The study showed that of the eight (8) target coral species, there were 3 of them found in Mabaw Reef.

Removal of 100 meters gill net trapped in Mabaw Reef with the City Councilors

Site visit and retrieval of the trapped gill net

MBEMO & CLGU Retrieved trapped gill net

Deployment of 2 bantay Dagat to protect Mabaw Reef

To apprehend illegal fishers intruding the Mabaw Reef

CLGU Number of apprehensions

2010 Allocation of annual budget for Mabaw Reef Support the priority needs of Mabaw Reef

CLGU PhP200,000 allocated by the CLGU

c. Threats and Challenges

The use of destructive fishing practices perturbs the fisherfolks communities and the local government units in the pursuit of marine protected area. The negative impacts of this problem are attributed to state of the hard enforcement and soft law enforcement of the local government unit. The table below shows division of problems and its underlying institutional and management concerns that aggravated the problems in MPA management.

30

Table _._Threats and Challenges

Hard enforcement Soft enforcement Institutional/Management

1. Commercial fishing operation inside city water e.g. bagnet, shiners and etc.

2. Intrusion of resident and non-resident fishers in Mabaw Reef

3. Use of cyanide and compressor fishing

4. Dynamite fishing operations

1. No marker buoys and guardhouse

2. Absence of Billboard and signages

3. Lack of communication facilities– handheld radio / cell phone

4. No 24/7 sea-borne patrolling

5. Lack of well-trained enforcement team / bantay dagat

1. Absence of Management Committee

2. Absence of Management Plan

3. lack of coordination between law enforcement

4. lack of appropriate equipment and paraphernalia

5. Absence of local monitoring team

6. Lack of alternative livelihood to fishers

31

2. MABAW MARINE SANCTUARY EFFECTIVENESS RATING

The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary is currently in Level 1 described as “Initiated” based on the effectiveness rating held last April 14-15, 2001. The table __ below shows all relevant indicators in each of the rating components that were met in the Management of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. On the other hand, some contributing factors that lower the rating result include the absence management plan, absence of functional management body, lack of community participation, absence of local monitoring team, and lack of maintenance of infrastructure and site development.

To achieve Level 3 in June 2012, the

Table: ___ Management Effective Rating Result for Mabaw Marine Sanctuary

32

Management Focus Relevant indicatorsTotal Available points

Actual Score per Management Focus

Actual Score divided by Total Available Points

Management Plan 4, [10], 27, 38, [39] 9 0 0.0%Management Body 5, [11], 20, 29,[32], 40 10 0 0.0%Legal Instrument and support 6, [9], 37, 41 6 4 66.7%Community Participation [1], [3], 8 7 7 100.0%Financing [12], 19, 28, 35, 49 9 3 33.3%IEC 7, 14,[ 23], [44], 45,[46] 12 5 41.7%Enforcement [13], 15, [21], [25], [26], [30], [36] 19 6 31.6%Monitoring and evaluation 2, 18, 24, 33, 34, 42, [43] 9 1 11.1%Maintenance of infrastructure and site development

16, 17, 22, 31, 47, 48 6 0 0.0%

87

3. Technical Working Group (TWG) and Management Committee (ManCom)

1. Mabaw Marine Sanctuary TWG

The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Technical Working Group was created Executive Order No.5 series of 2010 issued by the City Mayor Dan Neri Lim. The EO is issued in order to ensure that the Mabaw Reef Pride Campaign Program shall adopt the principle of participatory governance. Thus, the membership of the TWG is composed of the local government units, mandated resource management council, government line agencies, LGU alliance, non-government organization, academe, business sector and fishers organization. The TWG is responsible for the planning, implementation and monitoring of the project, assist in leveraging and sharing potential human and financial resources for the campaign, propose and recommend policy initiatives to the City Legislative Council, and assist in the establishment of the Mabaw Reef Marine Sanctuary Management Committee

Vision: A highly livable City

Mission: To create and provide policy, technical, logistical and networking support to the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary management committee to contribute towards the effective management of the sanctuary where a management plan is approved and implemented, an enforcement system is in place and Mabaw Marine Sanctuary ordinance is regularly reviewed and amended.

No. Name Position Organization Contact detailsRole in relation to

campaign9. HON. NUEVAS TIROL-MONTES

City Vice MayorLGU- Tagbilaran

411-5160 TWG Member

10. HON. DONI D. PIQUERO

SP Member, Committee Chair on Environment

LGU- Tagbilaran09209100772 TWG Chairperson

11. HON. GENESYL L. BALBIN SP, Committee Chair LGU- Tagbilaran 09155745080 TWG Secretary

33

on Fishery12. MR. EDUARDO C.

MACALANDAG OIC, City Administrator

LGU- Tagbilaran411-5160 TWG Member

13. PERLITA V. PALEN, DPACity Agriculturist

LGU-Tagbilaran411-2999 TWG Member

14.ENGR. PIANICITA CASTOLO City Engineer

LGU- Tagbilaran TWG Member

15.MR. SERVANDO TOLEDO

CFARMC Chairperson

CFARMC09264134186 TWG Member

16. MS. FIEL ANGELIE ARAO-ARAO-GABIN City Information

Officer

LGU-Tagbilaran09186479308 TWG Member

17. FOR. NESTOR CANDA PENRO, DENR- Bohol

DENR- Bohol 411-4278 TWG Member

18. MR. CRESENCIO PAHAMUTANG Provincial Fishery

Officer, BFAR- Bohol

BFAR- Bohol501-7881 TWG Member

19. HON. TIMOTEO MAGLAHUS Ubujan Barangay Captain

LGU- Ubujan 09064516611 TWG Member

20. HON. FARO CABALIT Taloto Barangay Captain

Local- Taloto 09173040503 TWG Member

13. MS. EMILIA M. ROSLINDAExecutive Director

PROCESS- Bohol 500-1992; 416-0067 TWG Member

14. FR. FRANCISCO ESTEPAPresident

Holy Name University c/o


34

15. MS. MARIETA S. GASATAN President BCCI- Bohol Chapter 412-5910 TWG Member

16. P/INPS JOSE B. LOS BANOS Station Chief Phil. Maritime Police TWG Member

17. PSUPT JULIUS CESAR V. GORNEZ Chief of Police

Tagbilaran City Police Office TWG Member

18. HON. EUTORGIO TELMO ChairpersonTagbilaran City Deputized Fishwarden Ass

411-2999 TWG Member

2. Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee

The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee was legitimized by E.O. No.6 series of 2011 issued on Ma____, 2011. The said Executive Order is a result of a round-table discussion between and among concerned stakeholders facilitated by RARE. The EO is was presented during the Management Committee Organizational Diagnosis and Effectiveness Rating Workshop held on April, 2011. The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee shall implement rules and regulations, for the protection, maintenance, and preservation of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary and supervise the day-to-day operations with the following specific functions and responsibilities;

a) Formulate, adopt and implement the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Annual Investment Plan and Budget based on the long-term Management Plan prepared by the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary TWG;

b) Propose and recommend policy initiatives to the Barangay, City Legislative Council and the MMS TWGc) Supervise the conduct of regular patrolling and guarding of the no-fishing-zone done by barangay and city enforcement

teams;d) Supervise the conduct regular hydro-biophysical survey; e) Conduct Information, Education and Communication Campaign;f) Prepare proposal for submission to the TWG for their resource generation activities;g) Prepare activity and financial reports to be submitted to the City-wide MPA Council;

35

h) Perform such functions as deemed necessary

Table: _ Management Committee Composition 1. Barangay Council of Ubujan ( Shall be determined by the council through a resolution) 2. Barangay Council of Taloto3. Chairperson of the Barangay Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council4. Representative of the MBEMO5. Representative of the City Agriculture Office6. Representative of the Tagbilaran City Deputized Fishwarden Association7. Boat operator/ maintenance8. Chairperson of the Barangay/Purok Tanod in each concerned barangay9. Representative from the fisher’s organizations [in each concerned barangay]10. Representative from the youth sector [in each concerned barangay]11. Representative from the women sector [in each concerned barangay] 12. One representative from the business sector of each barangay with enterprises or activities utilizing coastal and marine

resources

Note: Composed by various community stakeholders, the formation of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee is in progress.

36

1. Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Action Plan

This action plan is developed during the MPA Effectiveness Rating held on May 15, 2011. The MPA Management Effectiveness Rating divulged some areas of concerns that delayed the management growth of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. This is called the management focus, which means the basis for the action to address each relevant indicators with strategies to achieve Level 3 ‘enforced’ by May 2012. Necessary activities are stipulated in the action plan shown below.

Critical Areas Relevant Indicators

Smart objectives

Specific activity Person responsible

Timeframe Budget Sources of Budget

Support Needed

Management Plan [0.0%]

L1/4 Preliminary Management Plan

By end of June 2011, the 11th Sanggunian of Tagbilaran shall have adopted the 5-Year Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Plan.

TWG Meeting to review Mabaw Component in the CRM Plan

TWG, Mabaw Mgt. Committee

Last week of July

2,000 Mabaw BR Fund

Technical Assistance

L210 MP adopted and legitimized

MPA Planning Management Planning Workshop

TWG and Mabaw Mgt. Committee

1st Qtr. 2012 20,000 CLGU (CAO/CPDO/OSM), PBSP

Technical Assistance (facilitation and documentation)

Refinement and Finalization Workshop

TWG, Mgt. Committee

1st. qtr. 2012 20,000 CLGU Technical Assistance

SP deliberation and approval of the 5-Year Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Plan

TWG, SP- Chair on Environment/ Agriculture

2nd qtr. 2012- - Technical Input

Manualization/ packaging of the Mabaw MS Mgt. Plan

MBEMO/ Technical Writer

May 2012 20,000 Mabaw BR Fund

Technical Input

Management L1/5 By end of Issuance of MBEMO/ City Last week sa - - Technical Input

37

body [0.0%]

tentatively determine

June 2012, the the Mabaw MS Management Committee shall have been organized and functional with at least 40% membership is coming from fishers, women, youth and other important stakeholders.

Executive Order for Mabaw Management Committee

Mayor April

L2/11 MB formed and functional

Formation of the Mabaw Marine Sancturay Management Committee

TWG/ MBEMO

July 2011 5,000 Mabaw BR

FundFinancial/ Technical Assistance

L3/ MB active and supported by legal instrument

Internal Policy Building

TWG/ MBEMO

October, 2011

5,000 Mabaw BR Fund

Financial/ Technical Assistance

Conduct of Regular ManCom Meeting

TWG Last week of July

PHP20,000 BLGU Ubujan & Taloto

Technical Assistance

Conduct MPA Leadership Development Training/ Seminar

ManCom December, 2011

July 2012

40,000 CLGU and other possible sources

Technical Input on Training Needs Assessment

Financing [33.3%]

L3/19 Budget form LGU and from other sources allocated and accessible for MPA Management

By end of June 2012, the city government thru its 20% development fund shall have increased its budget allocation for Mabaw MS by 50%.

Prepare 2012 Annual Investment Plan for Mabaw Marine Sanctuary based on the MPA Action Plan

ManCom, CAO, Atty. Piquero

September, 2011

PhP 15,000 - Recommendation from concerned management body/council

By end of June 2012, the barangay LGU of Taloto

Prepare proposal for submission to the TWG for their resource

ManCom and TWG

July- June, 2012

5,000 BLGU Taloto/ Ubujan

Relevant data and regular coaching

38

and Ubujan, and other possible fund sources shall have allocated budget for the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

generation activities;

Review DILG barangay circular on Barangay appropriation to CRM program

Mancom and TWG

August, 2011 - - Technical input

By end of June, 2012, user fee system for Mabaw Reef shall have been in place and enforced by the CLGU in coordinatrion with the management committee.

Formulate/ design collection/ user fee scheme during the MPA Executive Meeting

ManCom, SP Committee chair on Environment

October-December, 2011

10,000 CLGU Technical Input

Barangay LGU Discussion on the collection fees

ManCom ( Executive Committee)


5,000 C/BLGU Logistical needs, legislative support

Discuss with diveshops and other stakeholders on the existing user fees laws.

ManCom ( Executive Committee), City Treasurer


10,000 CLGU Logistical need

Discuss user fee system with the City Treasurer, Barangay Treasurer and Punong Barangays



5,000 CLGU Legislative support

Deputation of Barangay Treasurer to collect user fees


January-March, 2011 - - Executive/

Legislative Support

Information, Education Campaign

L1/7 Education program raising awareness

By end of June 2011, the local communities along Mabaw

Quarterly Information dissemination during barangay assemblies of

ManCom ( Information & Education Team)

July 2011- June 2012 - - Information

materials

39

about MPA functions

Marine Sanctuary shall have increased their awareness on the MPA rules and regulations.

Manga, Ubujan, Taloto and Booy.

Run for Mabaw Reef

CLGU, ManCom ( Information & Education Team)

July 1, 2011 100,000 CLGU, RARE, PBSP

Logistics & Financial

L2/14 Education programs sustained

Radio discussion on Mabaw MS over Purok Patrol Program when held in barangay Manga, Ubujan, Taloto and Booy

ManCom ( Information & Education Team), BLGU

July 2011 to June 2012 - - Information

materials (poster, flyers)

L2/23 Education program sustained

On campus IEC to 4 Elementary schools ( Manga, Ubujan, Taloto & Booy)

ManCom ( Information & Education Team)

October, 2011

- -Letter of approval from DepEd, information materials

Note: To ensure that the concept on Mabaw Reef conservation and protection to the broadest constituents of the city, the social marketing plan will support this plan specifically for IEC components.Enforcement L2/15

Boundaries delineated

By end of June 2012, illegal fishing inside Mabaw MS shall have been stopped and the illegal fishing within the 5 kilometer radius from the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary shall have been stopped

Formation of the Mabaw Enforcement Team

ManCom, Tagbilaran City Deputized Fishwarden Association

August, 2011 15,000 Mabaw BR Fund

Technical Assistance, logistics, Executive support e.g. honorarium, deputation and etc.

L2/21 Collaborative Patrolling (PNP, Surveillance, fishwarden

Orientation of deputize fishwarden on MPA rules and other related information.

Fishing inside MPA stopped

Illegal fishing outside on MPA reduced

Establish Enforcement Communication System and

Gil Cabalit, CAO, City PNP

January-March, 2012

30,000 Mabaw BR Funds

Technical assistance, logistics

40

reduced. reporting/ logbook systemConduct regular sea-born patrol operations in coordination with the City PNP

Mabaw Enforcement Team, City PNP, TCDFWA,

July-June, 2012

150,000 ( gasoline, snacks)

CLGU (GSO) Re-reinforcement during critical apprehension incidences

Maintenance of Infrastructure

L2/16 Signboards/ billboard posted

By end of June 2012, necessary support infrastructures of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary shall have been installed/ purchased.

Installation of 3 Billboards and signage in conspicuous places

Jovenal, Gil and Ronie

ASAP

20,000 CLGU and other potential donors

Financial

L2/17 MPA Outpost and other structures

Installation of buoys and markers, and flaglets

Gil Cabalit, BLGU Taloto

June-July, 2011

130,000

CLGU Campaign Counterpart

Logistics: boat, gasoline, GPS and meals

Construction of guardhouse and information board

Gil Cabalit, CPDO, BLGU Taloto

June July, 2011

L3/22 MPA structures maintained

Monitoring and Evaluation

L2/18 Biophysical monitoring including local participation

By end of June, 2012, the Mabaw MS monitoring team shall have been organized and trained on participatory MPA monitoring tools.

Creation of the Mabaw MS Monitoring Team

ManCom ( Executive Committee)

July-Aug. 2012

10,000

Mabaw BR Funds

Training materials, technical assistance

L3/24 Regular Participatory biophysical monitoring

Conduct Training on MPA Monitoring

ManCom, BFAR and DENR

July-Aug. 2012

Manualization of Mabaw MPA Monitoring Report

MBEMO, CAO December, 2011, June 2012

10,000 CLGU Data and other reference materials

41

Monitoring

Progress of the BR implementation strategy will be measured against the specific SMART objectives outlined in the action table above.

The overall success of the Governance and Management Plan will be measured through the EcoGov/CCEF MPA effectiveness rating tool. The goal of the Plan, in combination with the Rare pride campaign is to level up the current MPA Effectiveness Rating from Level 1- Initiated to Level 3- Enforced by June 2012.

The monitoring plan of the Pride campaign foresees the monitoring of a number of additional metrics to assess the progress on barrier removal, behavior change and threat reduction:

% of members of Mgt Committee belonging to listed categories (local village leaders, influential family members, local women’s associations, private sector representatives, local religious groups, civil service and the youth sector)

% of days per month that there is a record of 24/7 guarding coverage in log book Increase in arrest for year 1 Number of attendees of Barangay Assemblies Monthly activities conducted by enforcement team (outreach, market denial, foot patrols, meetings with community

intelligence partners, etc.) average n of reports of intrusions received per month by the enforcement team N of intrusions from local versus outside fishers Decrease in intrusions from community and adjacent village Decrease in illegal and destructive fishing

For more details on the frequency and methods for data collection please refer to the campaign monitoring plan.

42

Feasibility and Impact

This action plan underwent expert validation and approval process. The planning workshop was facilitated by an external auditor, Rodolfo Santos, PhD. He has a long history of organizational development facilitation in organizations of various level and scale in the Philippines following a diverse business model. The tool used in planning i.e. MPA Effectiveness Rating is a standard tool in the Philippines to assess management performance of MPAs which has been published by White et al. 2001 and was further enhance by EcoGov Philippine and UP-MSI [MEAT]. The action plans was an output of the 2 day workshop participated by the TWG, ManCom local fishers, enforcers, LGU department heads who are considered experts in their localities thereby producing a ground truth strategies. Since this will be integrated in the Project Plan where LAP/LCE endorsement is affixed, the same signature will suffice for approval. This action plan will be validated back to the community after a series of iterations during module 3 to serve as the road map to achieve Level 3 status by June 2012.

43

B. SOCIAL MARKETING PROFILE

The planning work conducted was ground-truthed with a range of key stakeholders and experts through stakeholder meetings, focus group discussions and one-on-one interviews. These helped to build a composite portrait of the campaign target audiences, and design the quantitative survey (Section B4 and Appendix H) which was subsequently carried out across the campaign target area. The quantitative survey will both help us understand our primary audiences and allow us to establish a baseline for measuring change after the Pride campaign.

The formative research section below aims to provide a record of all qualitative research conducted, people spoken to and key outputs. The sequences in which the results of the formative research are presented here do not necessarily correspond to the chronology in which the data was collected, and in some cases, multiple iterations of the research, such as directed conversations with target audiences, were required.

1. Formative researchName of Interviewee: Faro CabalitOccupation: Punong Barangay, Taloto, Tagbilaran City

The main goal of protecting the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary is to provide a breeding ground to various kind so fishes. In my younger years, I used to fish in Mabaw Reef using hook-and-line and spear fishing that is the reason why I should strive hard to protect the area from illegal fishing activities. For the adjacent barangays, it is admirable when the also participate in the management and governance of the

44

Target Threat for Pride campaign

Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. Currently, the City Government of Tagbilaran is allocating budget for the construction of a guardhouse or watch tower to ensure a 24-hour safeguarding within the vicinity of the protected area. And, as the Barangay Captain of Taloto, we support the management of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. We will deploy fishwarden and barangay tanod to assist in the day-to-day seaborne patrol operations around the Mabaw Reef.

Name of Interview: Gil CabalitOccupation: Boat Operator/ Fishwarden, Tagbilaran City

The Mabaw Reef is a home of many marine resources that needs to be protected. Secodly, it is also a breeding ground and a dive sites for nearby dive shops and resorts. In fact, several divers keep coming back to dive in Mabaw Reef because of its beautiful underwater views. Soon, this will provide resource generating activities of the city of Tagbilaran and the communities along Mabaw Reef. As a boat operator and at the same time fishwarden, I will perform my job to make Mabaw Reef secured from illegal fishing and other

harmful activities.

Name of Interviewee: Perlita V. Palen, DPAOccupation: City Agriculturist

The Mabaw Reef is a precious jewel of the Tagbilaran City. This is also a pride of each of Tagbilaranon. The City Agriculture Office is mandated to help manage the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in coordination with the barangay government unit and the small fisher in Ubujan and Taloto. We assist in the formulation of plan and enforcement of ordinance to protect the Mabaw Reef from illegal fishing.

45

Name of Interview: Prof. Hyacinth SuarezOccupation: Instructor, Holy Name University

The social dimension is an important consideration in MPA Governance and Management. Using KAP survey in conservation would determine the level of awareness, behavior and fishing practices of the fishing communities along Mabaw Reef. Determining these factors is crucial in looking at effective management strategies to change behavior of the fishing communities and eventually realize the need for a better management of a no-take-zone like the Mabaw Reef. There are several problems on the coastal resources, but to discover the causes and its potential solutions is a challenge which is linked with the academe sector.

Name of Interviewer: Jesus MissionOccupation: Fisher, Manga, Tagbilaran City

Many small fishers in Tagbilaran City especially in Manga are fishing in Mabaw Reef because they catch commercially valuable fishes. Aside from it is rich in marine resources, the Mabaw Reef is also attached with several folklores that still exist at present time. The declaration of the Mabaw Reef as a protected area through a City Ordinance is a means to fully protect and to provide a home for the marine resources. This will also give a chance for the city to develop an ecotourism site.

46

2. Concept ModelsPrior to the First University Training in August 2010, a focus group discussion (FGD) was held with the ten (10) fishers identified by the fishers from Manga, Ubujan and Taloto. These fishers were those who fished in Mabaw Reef. In support to the data gathered, secondary reports were gleaned such as the underwater results and apprehension reports. The conceptual model was presented to the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Technical Working in January 2011. The Mabaw Marine Concept Model shows that weak implementation of CRM program is a root cause that results to problems leading towards the emergence of the direct threats which include irresponsible diving, sedimentation and overfishing.

47

Contributing Factor Direct Threats

Targets

Results Chain

48

The Mabaw MS Result Chain shows the causal effects on each of the behavior change stages of the target audiences. The Mabaw Reef Pride Campaign Program will focus five (5) target groups. These include the primary target audience- fishers in Ubujan and Taloto, and the local residents of the said barangays; and the secondary audiences composed of management committee, fishers from Manga and Booy and the City Hall officials and employees. These target audiences are expected to adopt new behaviors ( pls. see diagram) essential to reducing the threats and thereby achieving the conservation results in August 2012.

Based on the Result Chain Diagram, the fishers from Taloto and Ubujan will be involved on the strictly enforcement of Mabaw MS rules and regulation and the local resident of the same barangay will be involved in the activities related to Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

It is also expected that at the end of the project life, the members of the Management Committee will attend meetings related to the no-take zone. The fishers from Manga and Booy will cooperate in the reporting intrusions in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary, and the City Officials and employees will attend on Mabaw Reef related activities.

3. Establishing a Baseline: Quantitative survey

The onset of the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) survey started through identifying the local community enumerators who would compose KAP Survey Monitoring. In order to ensure desirable results of the KAP survey, the local enumerators were trained on the research methodology and being exposed to the survey questionnaire. To indulge themselves to the survey questionnaires, the local enumerators were involved in the translating the survey questionnaire into visayan version. Before they started the survey, a familiarization tour was held in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. The pre-campaign survey ran in March 2011 with twenty (20) local community enumerators on-board. This pre-campaign survey was conducted to gain a better understanding of the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of the target audiences in relation to the MPA and desired behavior changes as well as to establish a baseline for measuring the impact of the campaign on these audiences through the campaign. The results from the KAP survey are the basis for the creation of SMART objectives relating to the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) components of the campaign’s Theory-of-Change (ToC).

The survey collected basic socio-economic and demographic data of the target audiences and the survey questions that measured KAP comprise the so-called dependent variables. This pre-campaign survey also provides information about the target audiences’ trusted sources of environmental information, their preferred types of media programs, perceived barriers to behavior change, ground trothing and two-questions regarding the climate change.

A second post campaign survey will be conducted at the end of one year of the campaign activities being implemented in August 2011 to measure any change in these KAP variables in order to assess the level of attainment of the SMART objectives. A full description of the results can be found in the Project Plan Appendix F4.

The following table summarizes the number of people interviewed and the geographical distribution of the survey.

49

Manga

Ubujan

Taloto

Booy

CLGU

Mabaw MS

Geographic scope of survey

The KAP Survey was conducted to 169 fishers from Taloto and Ubujan; 370 local residents in Talot and Ubujan; 80 management committee potential membership; 240 fishers form Manga and Booy and 80 city hall officials and employees. A total of 933 respondents out of the five target audiences having a confidence interval of 5% and a confidence level of 3% depending on the target audience. The survey was conducted in the barangay Manga, Ubujan, Taloto and Booy, and in the New City Hall Building.

50

Survey target audiences and sample size

A. Sample size calculation

N of people Sample size at95%CL and 3%CI

Sample size at95%CL and 5%CI

Final sample size choice

Behavior Change

TA 1- Resident Fishers TA 1A- Taloto resident fishersTA 1B- Ubujan resident fishers

159- Ubujan and 84-Taloto (243)

169 132 169 Stop intruding into the MPA

TA 2- Combined Local Community TA 2A- Taloto local community TA 2B- Ubujan local community) (11,051)

964 370 370Participation in Mabaw MS related activities

TA 3 Enforcement Team (108)TA 3A- Management Committee (20)TA 3B- BLGU in Manga, Ubujan, Taloto and Booy- 36TA 3C- Barangay Tanod- Booy (24)TA 3D- Deputy fishwarden- 20

92 80 80 Strict enforcement of Mabaw ordinances

TA 4- Resident fishers in Booy and MangaTA 4A- Fishers from Booy (104) and TA 4B- Manga (225)= 329 234 169 234 ( CI- 5%)

Cooperation in reporting intrusion incidence in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary

TA 5- City Government of Tagbilaran (MO- 5, VMO-30, CAO-3, CPDO- 10, CTO-35, CBO- 6, CPNP- 62 (145)

CEO (76) and CBO (6) - excluded in the implementing office based on the ordinance

92 80 80 Active participation in Mabaw MS management related activities

51

Total 1,551 831 933B. Sampling methodology

TA1Resident Fishers

Stratified samplingGeographic scope of survey

N of people in listed locality

N of TA in locality % of total TA in locality sample size for TA in locality

TA- 1. Resident FishersTaloto 6,176 84 34.56 59

Ubujan 4,875 159 65.43 110 Total 11,051 289 99.99 169TA- 2. Local Community Taloto 6,176 6,036 56.14 207 Ubujan 4, 875 4,716 43.86 163 Total 10,752 370TA- 3. Mabaw MS Enforcement team 100 100 100 80

TA-4. Fishers from Neighboring BarangaysBooy 6,500 104 31.61 75Manga 6,081 225 68.38 160Total 12,581 329 99.36 234TA- 5. City Government of Tagbilaran

145 80 55.17 80 (79.99)TOTAL 933

Respondent selection method(This should be written in such a way that someone trying to replicate the survey has enough information to be able to use the same method)

TA 1. Considering the number of the resident fishers in Taloto and Ubujan, two enumerators of each barangay will conduct interview with the resident fishers to avoid the risk of interviewing the same fishermen twice. Pre-selection methods will be followed using the list of the fishers at the City Agriculture Office.

52

TA 2. The respondent will be chosen in random selection. The enumerator will be scattered in each purok of the barangay. Each enumerator will interview every third house from the previous house where an interview was made.

In case where the number of respondents will not be met by the enumerators, the enumerators will conduct an interview to an area of the barangay where the target audience are densely located.

TA 3. One enumerator in each barangay will be designated to interview the barangay LGUs, the barangay Tanud and the deputy fish warden and MPA management team members. However, the interview for the management committee will be done later, when the Mabaw MS Management committee will be formed.

TA 4. The same selection method used for TA 1.

TA 5. The enumerators for the City Government will be divided equally to the numbers of respondents from the city government.

53

Survey planning

Taloto

Resident fishers- 59 SS

Local Communities- 207 SS

Barangay Officials- 9

Barangay Tanod- 6

Total = 281 SS

281/6 interviewers= 42 respondents/ enumerator

Propose: 281/10 interviewers= 28 respondents/ enumerator

Ubujan

Resident fishers- 110 SS

Local Communities- 162 SS

Barangay Officials- 9

Barangay Tanod- 6

Total = 272 SS


Propose: 287/ 10 interviewers= 28 respondents/ enumerator

TA3- Enforcement Team

Enforcement Team- 80 SS

80/5 interviewers= 16 respondents/ enumerator ( taken by the LE per barangay except for Mgt. Committee and fishwarden)

(Note: List down fishwarden each barangay)

Booy

Booy

75 SS/ 3 Interviewers= 25 respondents

Manga

160 SS/ 5 interviewer= 32 respondents/ enumerator

54

Propose: 160 SS/ 6 interviewer= 26 respondents/ enumerator

TA5- City Government Employees

CLGU- 80 SS


Total survey sample size 933Time for enumerator to do one survey 30-40 minutesN of hrs enumerator works a day 4 hoursN of surveys one enumerator can do a day Present: 6 surveys

Propose: 4 surveys

N of enumerators available Present: 24Propose: 33

N of surveys done a day by total n of enumerators Present: 144Propose: 132

N of days needed to do survey Present: 933/144 = 7Propose: 7-10

Additional days needed for travel if any -Dates for training of enumerators

Final survey testing

Feb. 24, 2011

February 24, 2011

Beginning and end date of survey March 7, 2011 - March 21, 2011N of people available to do data entry Coordinate with staff of the City Planning and

Development Office to do the data entry.

55

To be coordinated with the CA.Beginning date of data entry March 11, 2011Date of completion of data entry March 30, 2011

Survey Results

Stages of Behavior Change ( Graphical form)

56

Understanding our audience

Insert a brief introduction listing your target audiences and their relevance to the campaign. (Reference p 68 of Serena & p84 of Lola)

TA1 - PRIMARY AUDIENCE – RESIDENT FISHERS OF TALAOTO AND UBUJAN

What do we know about this group?

Most resident fishers in Mabaw reefs communities fall under ages 45 to 49, and only a few of them were ages 15 to 19 (1%). Most of the resident and non-resident fishers in Mabaw Communities finished elementary (28.8%), and a few of them graduated college (3.5%). Most of the resident fishers have 5 member in the family. However, there were also fishers who reach up to more than ten members in the family (4.5%).

KnowledgeThe fishers in Taloto and Ubujan have different level of knowledge regarding the Marine Marine Sanctuary rules and regulations. In fact, many of them believe on the benefits that MPA could give to the local communities. However, most of the fishers perceived on the ecological/economic benefits rather than other benefits of MPA.

AttitudeMajority of the fishers Taloto and Ubujan have high level of support in terms of increasing the enforcement of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

PracticeInitiate discussion with the other fishers and other residents in the community about Mabaw Marine Sanctuary is a challenge faced with the by the resident fishers of Taloto and Ubujan.

Trusted sourcesAmong the options personalities, majority of the respondents chose Alijandro Ilaga Atienza aka Kuya Kim as the National Ambassador for Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Pride Campaign with the total percentage of 60%. This is followed by Cesar Montano (16.4%). Kuya Kim is a TV host of the ABS-CBN’s Matanglawin, a documentary program that features environment, science, history and the like.

Media sourcesResident fishers fishers in Mabaw Communities considered person on radio as a very trustworthy source of information. In fact, majority of them listen to radio 7 days per week (31.6%) with DYTR AM as the most listened radio. Majority of them said they have not heard of anyone taking part of any Mabaw MS related activities, and some said they heard.

57

Any other relevant information

Majority of the fishers in Taloto and Ubujan are aware If our local NTZ is well managed it will help buffer some of the effects of climate change in the future.

Comments None

TA2 - PRIMARY AUDIENCE – Local Community of Taloto and Ubujan


Roman Catholic is the common religion of the local community residents of Taloto and Ubujan. Many of them are High school to college graduate.

KnowledgeCommunity residents of Taloto and Ubujan have different levels of knowledge about the benefits of having a no-take zone and the rules and regulations that govern the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

AttitudeThe community residents of Taloto and Ubujan believe that non-enforcement of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary rules and regulations will result negative impacts to its resources and the communities as well. They trust the Barangay Captain to head and govern the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee.

PracticeOnly a few of the community residents have talked about their roles and involvement in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. Hence, it is a challenge for the community residents to start discussing with someone about the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary to enhance participation from various groups in the society.

Trusted sourcesThe person on TV is considered as the most trusted source of information of the community residents in Taloto and Ubujan. Religious leader is also considered as among the trusted sources of information if they told information about the environment.

Media sources DYTR AM is the preferred ration stations for most of the community residents in Talolot and Ubujan. New is the radio program they preferred to listen.


The community residents believe that lack of interest and lack of budget are the major barriers in establishing the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee.

Comments

58

TA3 –SECONDARY AUDIENCE – MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE


Most enforcement team members are College graduate and they are composed of barangay officials, barangay tanod and other sectors in the community.

Knowledge Most ManCom members are aware of the basic prohibition of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

AttitudeBased on KAP survey, barely half of the management committee member find it easy to attend Mabaw Marine Sanctuary related activities which include attendance to meetings, signing a petition and operationalization of the Mabaw Management Committee.

PracticeSome (38%) of the ManCom members have talked to anyone on the consequences of breaking the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary laws, rules & regulations.

Trusted sourcesFriends and family members are the most trusted source of information.

Media sourcesDYTR Am is the preferred local radio station.


The management committee preferred to listen radio program during 6:00 to 10:00 in the morning

Comments

TA4 - SECONDARY AUDIENCE – Fishers of Manga and Booy


Majority of the fishers in Manga and Booy is within 40 years old above. Most of them are elementary graduate and in secondary level.

59

KnowledgeThe Fishers in Manga and Booy are aware on the basic prohibitions in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

AttitudeMajority of the fishers in Manga and Booy are supportive to the increase in the enforcement of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. In fact, they find it easy to act as community intelligence to the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

PracticeA few number of fishers in Manga and Booy have talked about the consequence of breaking the rules and regulations of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. A few of them have also talked to the fishers in Taloto and Ubujan about reporting intrusion in Mabaw Reef to the local authorities.

Trusted sourcesManga fishers trust the most on the person on radio, while Booy fishers considered the person on TV as the most trusted source of information about environment.

Media sources DYTR AM is the preferred local radio station of Manga and Booy fishers.Any other relevant information

Kuya Kim Atienza is the chosen as the National Ambassor and Atty. Jess Tirol as the local ambassador for Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

Comments Some of them are not fishers in Mabaw Reef. The fish even outside the Maribojoc Bay.

TA4 - SECONDARY AUDIENCE – City Hall Employees


All of them coming from different City Department which have functions regarding the Mabaw Reef based in the City Ordinance. Majority (77%) of them are college graduate and others are college level (11.8%).

KnowledgeMany of the city hall employees have known about the basic regulations in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. Some also believe that the local government unit was regularly involved in determining the size of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

Attitude They strongly support in increasing the enforcement of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary rules and regulations.

60

PracticeThere were only few of them who talked to someone about their role in the managing the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

Trusted sourcesTrusted source of information is a teacher.

Media sourcesNewspaper is mostly the source of information. The Bohol Chronicle is the preferred newspaper of the city hall employees.


Local News is the preferred media type program.

Comments Selected offices only.

61

D. Monitoring Plan

The monitoring plan is to be completed in a dedicated excel spreadsheet. Once it is complete you can paste extracts of the campaign SMART objectives and TR and CR goals here.

Below the KAP section of the monitoring plan

Target Audiences

Results chain Survey question

Baseline & Target Stages of Behavior

Smart Goals

Pre campaign (baseline)

Target Desired pp change

TA1 - Fishers The resident fishers of Taloto and Ubujan have increased their level of awareness of the laws and regulations in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

(Q21) Please tell me what you know about the statement:(G) No-one can fish or collect shells inside Mabaw Marine Sanctuary[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

56% of resident fishers from Taloto and Ubujan who are aware of the Mabaw MS laws and regulation.

78.00% 22pp increase

(A) Attitude By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of the level of awareness of the resident fishers in Taloto and Ubujan on the laws and regulation of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary from 55.7% measured in May 2011 to 77.7%. ( 22pp)

The Taloto and Ubujan resident fishers strongly believe that the

(Q26) What is your level of support in increasing the enforcement of the

20.4% of resident fishers from Taloto and


(A) Attitude By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of resident fishers from Taloto

62

laws and regulations of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary must be strictly enforced to increase its benefits.

regulations of Mabaw MS

Ubujan who strongly support in the increase in enforcement of Mabaw MS regulations.

and Ubujan who strongly support in the increase in enforcement of Mabaw MS regulations from 20.4% measured in May 2011 to 33.4%. (13pp)

The Taloto and Ubujan resident fishers initiate discussions with other fishers in the community on the importance of strict enforcement of laws and regulations in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

(34) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "the consequences of breaking the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary laws, rules & regulations"? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this.

1.4% of resident fishers from Taloto and Ubujan who talk with other fishers in the community about the consequences of breaking the Mabaw MS law, rules and regulations


(IC) Interpersonal Communications

By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of resident fishers from Taloto and Ubujan who talk with other fishers in the community about the consequences of breaking the Mabaw MS law, rules and regulations from 1.4% measured in May 2011 to 29.4%. ( 28pp)

The Taloto and Ubujan residents fishers actively participate in the enforcement activities of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

(19) In the last 6 months, have you heard of anyone reporting someone breaking the rules and regulations of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary to the enforcement? Yes, No, Unsure, N/A

12% of the reident fishers have heard of anyone reporting someone breaking the rules & regulations of Mabaw MS to the

25% 13pp increase

(BR) Barrier Removal

By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of resident fishers from Taloto and Ubujan who have heard of anyone reporting someone breaking the rules & regulations of Mabaw MS to the enforcement team

63

enforcement team.

from of 12% measured in May 2011 to 25%. (13pp)

Active involvement of the resident fishers in Taloto and Ubujan on the strict enforcement of Mabaw MS laws and regulations.

(30) I am going to read to you a number of activities, and I would like you to tell me whether you would find it easy or difficult for you to do that activity.E.) Act as community intelligence to the Mabaw MS

44% of resident fishers from Taloto and Ubujan who find it easy to act as community intelligence in Mabaw MS


(BC) Behavior Change

By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of resident fishers from Taloto and Ubujan who find it easy to act as community intelligence in Mabaw MS from 44% measured in May 2011 to 58%. ( 14pp)

Reduced illegal and destructive fishing practices causing significant deterioration to coral cover and the fish biomass in Mabaw Mariine Sanctuary

(40) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 6 months (show the NTZ on a map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not)

38.7% of resident fishers from Taloto and Ubujan who say they have seen intrusion of resident fishers in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary

24% 14pp decrease

(TR) Threat Recution

By August 2011, a statistically significant decrease of resident fishers from Taloto and Ubujan who say they have seen intrusion of resident fishers in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary from 38.7% measured in May 2011 to 24.7%. ( _____pp)

Increase live coral (30) CUSTOMIZE Increase live insert insert pp (CR) Insert smart objective

64

cover by 5%Increase fish biomass by 10%

Has your catch increased, decreased or stayed the same as a result of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary? (If the person does not fish or glean mark as NA)[ ] Decreased [ ] Increased [ ] Stayed the Same [ ] N/A+ MERF survey+ community reef survey

coral cover by 5%Increase fish biomass by 10% (MERF)

target change Conservation Result

TA2 - Local Community (Taloto)

The resident of Taloto and Ubujan have increased their level of awareness about the benefits of having a well-enforced Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

(22) Some of the questions I am going to ask you are about the no-take fishing area that has been created in your local area. A no-take fishing area is a clearly identified area where no fish are allowed to be caught at any time by anyone.(COHORT QUESTION)

56% of the local community from Taloto and Ubujan who say there are benefit of having a no-take zone.


(K) Knowledge By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of community resident from Taloto and Ubujan who say that there are benefit of having a no-take zone from 56.4% measured in May 2011 to 78.4%. (22pp)

65

(A) Are there any benefits to the local community from having a no-take area nearby? (If respondent answers YES then please also ask next question)COHORT QUESTION)[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

The local residents of Taloto and Ubujan strongly believe on the benefits of having awell-enforced Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements on the possible impacts on the local community if the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Rules/Policies are not strictly observed by fishers: a) Fish will continue to decline in number and disappear

27% of the local community in Taloto and Ubujan strongly agree on the impacts on the local community if the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Rules/ Policies are not strictly observed by fishers.

40% 13pp increase

(A) Attitude By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of community residents from Taloto and Ubujan who find easy to attend community assemblies regarding the Mabaw MS 31% measured in May 2011 to 44%. (13pp)

The local residents of Taloto and Ubujan initiate discussions with

(32) CUSTOMIZE to IC objectives in TOC - In the past 6 months, have you

16.9% of the local community residents



By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of community residents from Taloto

66

other residents in the community on the benefits of having a well-enforced Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

talked to anyone about benefits to the community of a well enforced sanctuary? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. [ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner [ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws [ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older [ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger [ ] Talked to friend or neighbor [ ] Talked to village elder or local authority [ ] Talked to National government environmental officials [ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials [ ] Talked to Local government environmental

from Taloto and Ubujan who talked to anyone about the benefits to the community of a well-enforced sanctuary

and Ubujan who will talk to anyone about the benefits to the community of a well-enforced sanctuary from 16.9% measured in May 2011 to 44.9%. (28pp)

67

officials [ ] Talked to a Local Mabaw Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Other ________________

The Taloto and Ubujan local residents will attend community assemblies regarding the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary related activities.

29) CUSTOMIZE according to BC and BR, ADD AS APPROPRIATEI am going to read to you a number of activities, and I would like you to tell me whether you would find it easy or difficult for you to do that activity.

(D ) Attend community assemblies regarding Mabaw Marine Sanctuary[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult [ ] Not sure [ ] Not applicable

51.6% of the community residents from Taloto and Ubujan who find it easy to attend community assemblies regarding the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.



By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of community residents from Taloto and Ubujan who find it easy to attend community assemblies regarding the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary from 51.6% measured in May 2011 to 64.6%. (13pp)

Active involvement of the residents in Taloto and Ubujan on community activities related to Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

(20) In the last 6 months have you heard of anyone taking part in any activities related to the Mabaw MPA?()Yes ()No ()don’t

15.% of the community residents from Taloto and Ubujan who have heard of



By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of community residents from Taloto and Ubujan who have heard of anyone taking part in any activities

68

know ()NA anyone taking part in any activities related to Mabaw MS

related to Mabaw MS from 15.3% measured in May 2011 to 29.3%. (14pp)



28.4% of the local community residents from Taloto and Ubujan who say they have not seen someone fishing in this area in the past 6 months 41.4%. (13pp)



By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of community residents from Taloto and Ubujan who say they have not seen someone fishing in this area in the past 6 months ( Mabaw MS) from 28.4% measured in May 2011 to 41.4%. (13pp)

Increase live coral cover by 5%

By August 2011, Increase live coral cover by 5%

insert pre campaign result

insert target

insert pp change

(CR) Conservation Result

By August 2011, Increase live coral cover by 5%Increase fish biomass by 10% (MERF)

Increase fish biomass by 10%

Increase fish biomass by 10% (MERF)

TA3 - Management Committee

The members of the Enforcement Team have increased their level of awareness

(21) Please tell me what you know about the following statements:

50% of ManCom members who are aware to catch fish or

72% 22pp increaae

(K) Knowledge By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of ManCom members who are aware to catch fish or

69

Mabaw on the fishing rules and regulations in Marine Sanctuary.

collect shells in Mabaw MS is prohibited.

collect shells in Mabaw MS is prohibited from 50% measured in May 2011 to 72%. ( 22pp)

The members of the Enforcement Team strongly believe that the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary rules and regulations must be strictly enforced.

(31) I am going to read you a number of statements about the management of the local no-take area. For each statement, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it.(COHORT QUESTION)

(F) The rules of the no-take area are regularly enforced so that violators are caught and punished[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

11% of community residents from Taloto and Ubujan who strongly agree that rules of Mabaw MS are enforced

24% 13pp increase

(A) Attitude By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of community residents from Taloto and Ubujan who strongly agree that rules of Mabaw MS are enforced from 11.1% measured in May 2011 to24.1%. (13pp)

The members of the Enforcement Team have increased discussions on the

(34) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "the consequences of

38% of ManCom members who talk anyone on the

67% 22pp increase


By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of ManCom members who talk anyone on the

70

ways to strictly enforce the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary rules and regulations.

breaking the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary laws, rules & regulations"? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. [ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner [ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws [ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older [ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger [ ] Talked to friend or neighbor [ ] Talked to village elder [ ] Talked to National government environmental officials [ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials [ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials [ ] Talked

consequences of breaking the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary laws, rules & regulations

consequences of breaking the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary laws, rules & regulations from 38.7% measured in May 2011 to 66.7%. (28pp)

71

to a Local Mabaw Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Other ________________

Improved governance and management of Mabaw Marine.

(32) I am going to read you a number of statements about the management of the local no-take area. For each statement, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it.


Insert smart objective

The members of the Enforcement Team involved in the management and enforcement of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary rules and regulations.

38) During the past 6 months, would you say that you have been regularly involved, occasionally involved, or not involved with the creation and/or the management of a no-take fishing area in your local area

5.6 of the ManCom members are regularly involved in the management of Mabaw MS from 5.6% measured in May 2011 to 19.6%. (14pp)


By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of ManCom members who are regularly involved in the management of Mabaw MS from 5.6% measured in May 2011 to 19.6%. (14pp)

Reduced illegal and destructive fishing practices causing significant deterioration to

(40) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would



72

coral cover and the fish biomass in Mabaw Mariine Sanctuary

like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 6 months (show the NTZ on a map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not)

Increase live coral cover by 5% and increase fish biomass by 10%

(30) CUSTOMIZEHas your catch increased, decreased or stayed the same as a result of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary? (If the person does not fish or glean mark as NA)[ ] Decreased [ ] Increased [ ] Stayed the Same [ ] N/A

(+ MERF + community reef monitoring results)



TA4 - Fishers from Manga and Booy

The fishers from the barangay of Booy and Manga have increased

(A) Are there any benefits to the local community from having a no-take

43% of fishers from Manga and Booy are aware on the

65% 22pp increase

(K) Knowledge By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of fishers from Manga and Booy

73

their level of awareness on the benefits of having a nearby no-take zone.

area nearby? (If respondent answers YES then please also ask next question)COHORT QUESTION)[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

benefits of having a nearby no-take zone from 42.7% measured in May 2011 to 64.7%. ( 22pp)

who are aware on the benefits of having a nearby no-take zone from 42.7% measured in May 2011 to 64.7%. ( 22pp)

The fishers from Booy and Manga strongly believe on the benefits of having a nearby no-take zone.

(26) What is your level of support for increasing the enforcement of the regulations of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary? [ ] Strongly do not support the increase in enforcement [ ] Do not support the increase in enforcement [ ] Support the increase in enforcement [ ] Strongly support the increase in enforcement [ ] Unsure

33% of fishers from Manga and Booy strongly support for increasing the enforcement of Mabaw MS rules and regulations 33.5% to 46.5%. (13pp)

46% 13pp (A) Attitude By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of fishers from Manga and Booy who strongly support for increasing the enforcement of Mabaw MS rules and regulations 33.5% measured in May 2011 to 46.5%. (13pp)

The fishers from Booy and Manga have increased discussions with

(30) CUSTOMIZE to IC objectives in TOC - In the past 6 months, have you

36% of fishers from Manga and Booy who talk with

64% 28pp increase


By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of fishers from Manga and Booy

74

the other fishers on the benefits of having a nearby no-take zone.

talked to anyone about benefits to the community of a well enforced sanctuary? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. [ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner [ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws [ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older [ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger [ ] Talked to friend or neighbor [ ] Talked to village elder or local authority [ ] Talked to National government environmental officials [ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials [ ] Talked to Local government environmental

anyone about the benefits to the community of a well enforced sanctuary from 36.5% o 64.7%. (28pp)

who talk with anyone about the benefits to the community of a well enforced sanctuary from 36.5% measured in May 2011 to 64.7%. (28pp)

75

officials [ ] Talked to a Local Mabaw Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Other ________________

Involvement of the fishers from barangay Booy and Manga in Mabaw Law Enforcement Communication Network.

(Q26) What is your level of support in increasing the enforcement of the regulations of Mabaw MS[ ] Strongly do not support the increase in enforcment [ ] Do not support the increase in enforcement [ ] Support the increase in enforcement [ ] Strongly support the increase in enforcement [ ] Unsure

33.5% of fishers from Manga and Booy who strongly support for increasing the enforcement of Mabaw MS rules and regulations May 2011 to 36.5%. (13pp)

36% 13pp increase


By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of fishers from Manga and Booy who strongly support for increasing the enforcement of Mabaw MS rules and regulations from 33.5% measured in May 2011 to 46.5%. (13pp)

Cooperation in reporting intrusion incidence in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary

(38) During the past 6 months, would you say that you have been regularly involved, occasionally involved, or not involved with the creation and/or the

2% of the fishers in Manga and Booy who regularly involved in the management of the no-take area in the

15% 13pp increase


By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of fishers from Manga and Booy who regularly involved in the management of the no-take area in the locality from 2.2% measured in May 2011

76

management of a no-take fishing area in your local area(COHORT QUESTION)(A) [ ] Regularly involved [ ] Occasionally involved [ ] Never involved [ ] Don't know / not applicable

locality to 15.2%. (13pp)



38.7% of resident fishers from Taloto and Ubujan who say they have seen intrusion of resident fishers in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary

24% 14pp decrease


By August 2011, a statistically significant decrease of resident fishers from Taloto and Ubujan who say they have seen intrusion of resident fishers in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary from 38.7% measured in May 2011 to 24.7%. ( _____pp)

Increase live coral cover by 5%Increase fish biomass by 10%

(30) CUSTOMIZEHas your catch increased, decreased or stayed the same as

Increase live coral cover by 5%Increase fish biomass by

insert target

insert pp change



77

a result of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary? (If the person does not fish or glean mark as NA)[ ] Decreased [ ] Increased [ ] Stayed the Same [ ] N/A+ MERF survey+ community reef survey

10% (MERF)

TA4 - City Hall Employees/ officials

The officials and the employees of the City Government will increase their level of awareness on their roles in the proper management of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

(23) I am going to read you a list of people, and I would like you to tell me for each one how much you believe that during the past 6 months they have been able to determine the regulations for your local no-take fishing area. Were these individuals the most important decision makers, involved but not the decision makers, or not involved in decision-making?(COHORT

35.4% of CLGU officials and employees believe that CLGU had been able to determine the regulations for the local no-take zone

57% 22pp increase

(K) Knowledge By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of CLGU officials and employees who believe that CLGU had been able to determine the regulations for the local no-take zone from 35.4 measured in May 2011 to 57.4%. ( 22pp)

78

QUESTION)

(B) Local Government officials[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know

The officials and the employees of the City Government strongly believe that they have important roles in the proper management and governance of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.


(A) There is a clear plan for how the no-take area will be managed[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

41% of CLGU officials and employees agreed that there is a clear plan for how the Mabaw MS will be managed

54% 13pp increase

(A) Attitude By August 2011, a statistically significant increase of CLGU officials and employees who agreed that there is a clear plan for how the Mabaw MS will be managed from 41.5% measured in May 2011 to 54.5%. (13pp)

The officials and employees of the

32) In the past 6 months, have you

11% of CLGU officials and

39% 28pp increase

(IC) Interpersonal

By August 2011, a statistically significant

79

City Government initiates discussions among others on their roles in the proper management of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary

talked to anyone about your role in the proper management of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in order to benefit their community? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. [ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner [ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws [ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older [ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger [ ] Talked to friend or neighbor [ ] Talked to village elder or local authority [ ] Talked to National government environmental officials [ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials [ ] Talked

employees talked with anyone about their role in the proper management of the no-take zone.

Communications increase of CLGU officials and employees who talk with anyone about their role in the proper management of the no-take zone from 11.1% measured in May 2011 to 39.1%. (28pp)

80

to Local government environmental officials [ ] Talked to a Local Mabaw Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Other ________________

Adoption and Implementation of the long-term Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Plan


(A) There is a clear plan for how the no-take area will be managed[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DKYes to above for KAP. When you set your SMART objectives you can

insert pre campaign result

insert target

insert pp change



81

also set one about the plan being adopted

Active participation in Mabaw MS related activities

(20) In the last 6 months have you heard of anyone taking part in any activities related to the Mabaw MPA?

26% of the city hall officials and employees who have heard of anyone taking part in any activities related to Mabaw MS from 30%. (14pp)

30% 14pp increase


By August 2012, a statistically significant increase of city hall officials and employees who have heard of anyone taking part in any activities related to Mabaw MS from 26% measured in May 2011 to 30%. (14pp)





Increase live coral cover by 5% and

(30) CUSTOMIZEHas your catch

(CR) Conservation


82

increase fish biomass by 10%

increased, decreased or stayed the same as a result of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary? (If the person does not fish or glean mark as NA)[ ] Decreased [ ] Increased [ ] Stayed the Same [ ] N/A

(+ MERF + community reef monitoring results)

Result

E. WORK PLAN WITH BUDGET

The specific activities and budget for the campaign are outlines in a separate excel spreadsheet. Once it is complete you can insert a brief reference to it here listing some of the key activities and the total budget.

83

F.ENDORSEMENT OF THIS PLAN

This plan has been shared with and endorsed by the Technical Working Committee and Management Committee of the XXX MPA It was also shared with key stakeholders XXX as well as with those interviewed during the directed conversations. Throughout the planning process new ideas and recommendations have been incorporated and revisions made, to the extent that this plan has now been approved by all critical partners including the Mayor of XXX, the LAP supervisor XXX and Rare. The plan will be posted on RarePlanet, which will continue to be used for information sharing and periodic updates: www.rareplanet.org (insert link to your campaign milestones page).

This plan has been read and approved by

Please insert Name- title & signature & date



84

http://www.rareplanet.org/

G. References and Acknowledgements

ReferencesInsert a list of all literature consulted & referenced in the planExample: Margoluis, R. A. & Salafsky N. (1998) Measures of Success, Island Press, Washington DC.

Jenks B. (2001) An island under threat;; 96pp Searon Press

AcknowledgementsInsert a brief note acknowledging and thanking all those who helped you produce this plan.

85

H. APPENDICES

1.Fisheries profileRefer to fisheries profile template for this, insert only those sections that you have done through your PCRA

( Not finished yet with the community monitoring)

86

2.Executive Order for TWG & Mancom

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of Bohol

City of Tagbilaran

OFFICE OF THE CITY MAYOR

EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 5Series of 2010

CREATING THE MABAW MARINE SANCTUARY TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP, MANDATING ITS FUNCTIONS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

WHEREAS, Article II, Section 16 of the 1987 Constitution provides that the State shall protect and advance the right of the people to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony of nature;

WHEREAS, the Local Government Code of 1991 or Republic Act No. 7160, devolves the management of the municipal waters and its fisheries and aquatic resources to the municipal government;

87

WHEREAS, the Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998 or Republic Act 8550, mandates that the city government may enact appropriate ordinances which shall ensure the sustainable development, management and conservation of its territorial waters including its fisheries and aquatic resources;

WHEREAS, the City Government of Tagbilaran enacted City Ordinance No. C-204 providing for the sustainable development, management and conservation of the territorial waters of the city of Tagbilaran including its fisheries and aquatic resources;

WHEREAS, Section 39 of the City Ordinance C-204 declared the establishment of Mabaw Reef Marine Sanctuary to properly protect and manage the city’s marine resources;

WHEREAS, the City Government of Tagbilaran in partnership with the Barangay Local Governments of Ubujan and Taloto, Maribojoc Bay Resource Management Board and RARE Incorporated implements a two-year Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Pride Program;

WHEREAS, there is a need to formally organize the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Technical Working Group to ensure continuous guidance and technical assistance in terms of marine sanctuary governance for the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Council;

WHEREAS, effective and sustained governance and enforcement of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary rules and regulations is an essential component for the successful and meaningful implementation of the two-year Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Pride Campaign Program;

WHEREAS, Mabaw Reef provides the opportunity for Tagbilaran City to showcase its very productive coral reef resources for food security and establish Tagbilaran as a marine ecotourism showcase site and a source of Pride for the City of Tagbilaran;

NOW, THEREFORE, premises considered, and by virtue of the powers vested in me by law, I, DAN NERI LIM, Mayor of the City of Tagbilaran, do hereby order the following:

Section 1. CREATION. There is hereby created a Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Technical Working Group (TWG) to be composed of the following:

13. City Mayor or his representative

14. City Vice Mayor or her representative

88

15. Chairperson, Sangguniang Panlungsod, Committee on Environment

16. Chairperson, Sangguniang Panlungsod, Committee on Fishery

17. Representative of the City Planning and Development Office

18. Representative of the City Agriculturist Office

19. Representative of the City Engineering Office

20. Representative of the City Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council

21. City Information Officer

22. Representative of Department of Environment and Natural Resources

23. Representative of the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources

24. Punong Barangay of Ubujan

25. Punong Barangay of Taloto

26. Representative of the Maribojoc Bay Executive Management Office;

27. One representative of the Non-government Organizations (NGOs) implementing coastal resource management (CRM) project in either barangay Ubujan or Taloto working in the field site in the concerned barangays

28. One representative from the academe with research or extension activities in either of the two barangays

29. One representative from the business sector with enterprises or activities utilizing coastal and marine resources

30. Representative of the City Police Office

31. Representative of the Tagbilaran City Deputized Fishwarden Association

89

32. Representative of the Philippine Maritime Police

Section 2. FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Technical Working Group shall have the following functions and responsibilities as a technical arm of the Mabaw Reef Marine Sanctuary Management Council:

a. Spearhead the planning, implementation and monitoring of the project.

b. Assist in leveraging and sharing potential human and financial resources for the campaign

c. Propose and recommend policy initiatives to the City Legislative Council

d. Assist in the establishment of the Mabaw Reef Marine Sanctuary Management Committee

e. Perform such other functions deemed necessary for the development of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary

Section 3. OFFICERS AND TENURE. During such organizational meeting, the members shall elect from among themselves the chairperson as may be agreed upon by the members. They shall serve co-terminus with the city council. The members of the TWG shall hold an regular meeting upon proper notice from the chairperson duly noted by the undersigned. ( Secretary as may be chosen by the Chairperson)

Section 4. FUNCTIONS OF THE TWG CHAIRPERSON

a. Presides all meetings agreed upon by the TWG;

b. Oversees the entire implementation of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Pride Program;

c. Coordinates with the project partners and the local government of Tagbilaran in all concerns relative to the Mabaw Reef Marine Sanctuary development;

90

d. Provides venues for consensus building among members of the TWG;

e. Perform such other functions deemed necessary for the development of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary

Section 5. MEETINGS. The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Technical Working Group shall meet regularly at least twice in every quarter at a venue agreed upon by the majority of its members. Regular meeting dates will be agreed upon at the beginning of each calendar year and only changed with at least one month’s notice. A majority of the members of the board shall constitute a quorum to transact business.

Section 6. THE PRIDE PROGRAM SUPERVISOR. To help facilitate the implementation of its different programs and projects, the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Technical Working Group may choose Campaign Program Supervisor/s duly designated by the City Mayor. The Pride Program Supervisor shall have the following roles and functions:

a. To be the primary point of contact throughout the Campaign, and will review important project documents, provide timely feedback and approvals on reports, participate and arrange for participation in relevant meetings, etc as laid out in Section 3.5 and Appendix B of the MOU.

b. To serve as a source of general strategic and organizational support to the Campaign Manager during the Campaign, and ensure that the Campaign is well integrated into LAP’s related strategic initiatives.

c. To provide comments and feedback regarding the application for the Campaign, the Theory of Change, and the integration into Partner’s long term conservation strategy at the site.

d. Agreement to provide the time, support and mentorship to accomplish the deliverables and provide approvals in a timely

e. To use its best efforts to maintain an updated presence, and otherwise support the Campaign as needed on RarePlanet.

91

Section 7. THE MABAW MARINE MANAGEMENT PLAN. The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Technical Working Group in coordination with the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee shall facilitate the preparation of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Plan and shall endorse it to the local government unit for review and approval.

Section 8. APPRORIATION. Funds shall be allocated to support the necessary activities of the Technical Working Group upon receipt of an agreed annual work plan for 2011 and 2012;

Section 9. This Executive Order shall take effect immediately upon signing hereof.”

Done this ___________________ at Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines.

ATTY. DAN NERI LIM City Mayor

92

Republic of the PhilippinesProvince of Bohol

City of Tagbilaran

OFFICE OF THE CITY MAYORNew City Hall, Tagbilaran City, 6300 Bohol

EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. ___Series of 2011

CREATING THE MABAW MARINE SANCTUARY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE, MANDATING ITS FUNCTIONS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

WHEREAS, the Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998 or Republic Act 8550, mandates that the city government may enact appropriate ordinances which shall ensure the sustainable development, management and conservation of its territorial waters including its fisheries and aquatic resources;

WHEREAS, the City Government of Tagbilaran enacted City Ordinance No. C-204 providing for the sustainable development, management and conservation of the territorial waters of the city of Tagbilaran including its fisheries and aquatic resources;

WHEREAS, Section 38 of the City Ordinance C-204 states that the city government, through the existing institutions and organizations, including the CFARMC shall develop appropriate guidelines in the management and operation of Marine Sanctuaries;

WHEREAS, Section 39 of the City Ordinance C-204 states that the City government, in coordination with the Barangay Council of Ubujan, CFARMC, CAO and concerned people’s organization, shall supervise the management of the Mabaw Reef Marine Sanctuary with the following location and geographic coordinates;

WHEREAS, the City Mayor Dan Neri Lim issued Executive Order No. 5 Series of 2010 mandated the creation of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Technical Working Group composed by various sectors in community;

93

WHEREAS, the legitimization of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee ( MMSMC ) which shall be composed by various sectors of the concerned barangays ensures transparent, accountable and participatory processes in the governance and management of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary;

NOW, THEREFORE, premises considered, and by virtue of the powers vested in me by law, I, DAN NERI LIM, Mayor of the City of Tagbilaran, do hereby order the following:

Section 1. CREATION. There is hereby created a Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee to be composed of the following:

33. Barangay Council of Ubujan ( Shall be determined by the council through a resolution)

34. Barangay Council of Taloto

35. Chairperson of the Barangay Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council

36. Representative of the MBEMO

37. Representative of the City Agriculture Office

38. Representative of the Tagbilaran City Deputized Fishwarden Association

39. Boat operator/ maintenance

40. Chairperson of the Barangay/Purok Tanod in each concerned barangay

41. Representative from the fisher’s organizations [in each concerned barangay]

42. Representative from the youth sector [in each concerned barangay]

43. Representative from the women sector [in each concerned barangay]

94

44. One representative from the business sector of each barangay with enterprises or activities utilizing coastal and marine resources

Section 2. FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES. The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee shall implement rules and regulations, for the protection, maintenance, and preservation of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary and supervise the day-to-day operations with the following specific functions and responsibilities;

i) Formulate, adopt and implement the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Annual Investment Plan and Budget based on the long-term Management Plan prepared by the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary TWG;

j) Propose and recommend policy initiatives to the Barangay, City Legislative Council and the MMS TWG

k) Supervise the conduct of regular patrolling and guarding of the no-fishing-zone done by barangay and city enforcement teams;

l) Supervise the conduct regular hydro-biophysical survey;

m) Conduct Information, Education and Communication Campaign;

n) Prepare proposal for submission to the TWG for their resource generation activities;

o) Prepare activity and financial reports to be submitted to the City-wide MPA Council;

p) Perform such functions as deemed necessary

Section 3. OFFICERS AND TERMS OF OFFICE . In a meeting duly assembled for the purpose, the members shall elect from among themselves the chairperson and other officers of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee. They shall serve co-terminus with the local chief executive. ( Secretary as may be chosen by the Chairperson)

95

Section 4. MEETINGS. The Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee shall meet regularly at least once a month. The MMSMC members shall hold a regular meeting upon proper notice from the chairperson.

Section 6. MANAGEMENT TEAMS. The following different management teams shall be organized: Executive Team, (Barangay Captains, CAO, MBEMO, Fishwarden, BFARMC) Enforcement and Maintenance Team, Information and Education Team, Resource Monitoring Team, Committee on Financial Sustainability Team, and other teams that may be deemed necessary by the Committee.

Section 7. SOURCES OF FUNDS AND ACCOUNTING SYSTEM. The City Government shall allocate funds to implement the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Plan and other necessary activities of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee. The application of funds shall follow the regular government accounting procedures.

Section 8. BARANGAY CONTRIBUTION. Whenever necessary and upon recommendation of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee, the barangay Taloto and Ubujan may appropriate funding subsidy for the purpose.

Section 9. COORDINATION OF THE BARANGAY COUNCILS OF MANGA AND BOOY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MABAW MARINE SANCTUARY. The Barangay Councils of Manga and Booy shall work closely with the Management Committee especially on coastal law enforcement undertaking to prevent illegal activities in Mabaw Marine Sanctuary and for other activities as deemed necessary.

Section 10. This Executive Order shall take effect immediately upon signing hereof.”

SO ORDERED.

Done this ___________________ at Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines.

ATTY. DAN NERI LIM City Mayor

96

3.Survey Questionnaire

Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Conservation ProjectKnowledge, Atittude, Practices ( KAP ) Survey

Hello, good morning/afternoon! My name is ______________________ and I am one of the community survey enumerators as part of the preparatory phase on the Conservation Program for Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. This campaign program is implemented by the City Government of Tagbilaran in partnership with the Maribojoc Bay Executive Management Office MBEMO and the RARE, a US based-organization that support campaign for sustainable fishing in our country. Our Mabaw Marine Sanctuary is among the twelve (12) campaign sites in the Philippines. I am very pleased to have you as one of the respondents randomly selected for this purpose. We would very much appreciate your participation in this survey by answering a few questions about the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary .

Whatever information you provide will be kept strictly confidential and your name and answers will not be shown to or shared with any other person except for those people who are working on the survey. Your answers will help us to plan and implement the Pride

Campaign Program for Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

Respondent agrees to be interviewed (If no, keep tally on separate sheet of paper)[ ] Yes [ ] No

Section 1Background information filled in prior to the interview without asking the respondent

Interviewer:

[ ] ME-1 [ ] ME- 2 [ ] ME- 3 [ ] ME- 4 [ ] ME- 5 [ ] UE- 1 [ ] UE- 2 [ ] UE- 3 [ ] UE- 4 [ ] UE- 5 [ ] TE- 1 [ ] TE- 2 [ ] TE- 3 [ ] TE- 4 [ ] TE- 5 [ ] BE- 1 [ ] BE- 2 [ ] BE- 3 [ ] BE- 4 [ ] BE- 5 [ ] CE- 1 [ ] CE- 2 [ ] CE- 3 [ ] CE- 4 [ ] CE- 5 [ ] UE-6

Barangay:[ ] Taloto [ ] Ubujan [ ] Booy [ ] Manga [ ] N/A

98

Enumeration area (EA):[ ] Purok 1 [ ] Purok 2 [ ] Purok 3 [ ] Purok 4 [ ] Purok 5 [ ] Purok 6 [ ] N/A

Date (month/day/year):________________

Survey period:[ ] Pre campaign - Baseline (Feb 2011) [ ] Post-campaign (June 2012)

Target Audience:[ ] TA 1A (Taloto resident fishers) pre-selected [ ] TA 1B (Ubujan resident fishers) pre-selected [ ] TA 2A ( Taloto local community) random [ ] TA 2B (Ubujan local community) random [ ] TA 3 (Management committee) pre-selected [ ] TA 4A (Manga resident fishers) pre-selected [ ] TA 4B ( Booy resident fishers) pre-selected [ ] TA 5 (City officials and employees) pre-selected

Gender of respondent:[ ] Male [ ] Female

Section 2 Socioeconomic and Demographic Questions

"To begin, I would like to ask you some questions about yourself"

(1) How old were you at your last birthday?[ ] 14 or younger [ ] 15 to 19 [ ] 20 to 24 [ ] 25 to 29 [ ] 30 to 34 [ ] 35 to 39 [ ] 40 to 44 [ ] 45 to 49 [ ] 50 to 54 [ ] 55 or older

(2) What is your highest educational attainment?". [ ] Primary level [ ] Elementary Level [ ] Elementary Graduate [ ] Seconday Level [ ] Secondary Graduate [ ] College Level [ ] Gollege Graduate [ ] Post Graduate School [ ] Vocational School [ ] Refuse to answer

(3) If you belong to a religion, please tell me which religion. Please choose one only.

[ ] Roman catholic [ ] Iglesia Filipina Indipendente (IFI) [ ] Iglesia Ni Kristo [ ] Church of Latter Day Saints [ ] Protestant[ ] Local/traditional [ ] Refuses to answer [ ] None [ ] Other ________________

99

(4) What is your primary occupation? [choose one only][ ] Fishing [ ] Farming [ ] Gleaning [ ] Small business (shop keeper or sales person) [ ] Office work [ ] Factory or manufacturing [ ] Food preparation or restaurant [ ] Professional (Lawyer, Health care provider) [ ] Handicrafts [ ] Transportation (shipping, trucking, rail) [ ] Education [ ] housework [ ] student [ ] Not currently employed [ ] non-governmental organisation [ ] self employed [ ] government (local) [ ] government (state or national) [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(5) What is your secondary occupation? [choose one only][ ] Fishing [ ] Farming [ ] Gleaning [ ] Small business (shop keeper or sales person) [ ] Office work [ ] Factory or manufacturing [ ] Food preparation or restaurant [ ] Professional (Lawyer, Health care provider) [ ] Handicrafts [ ] Transportation (shipping, trucking, rail) [ ] Education [ ] housework [ ] student [ ] Not currently employed [ ] non-governmental organisation [ ] self employed [ ] government (local) [ ] government (state or national) [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(6) How many people live in your household?[ ] 1 (me) [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5 [ ] 6 [ ] 7 [ ] 8 [ ] 9 [ ] 10 [ ] More than 10

(7) In the past calendar year, from January to December, what is your best estimate of the total income earned by all family members that currently live in the same home with your. Again, this information will not be shared with anyone. [ ] Below 30,000 Pesos W [ ] Between 30,000 and 50,000 [ ] Between 50,001 and 75,000 [ ] Between 75,001 and 100,000 [ ] Greater than 100,000 Pesos W [ ] Not sure [ ] Refused

(8) What percentage of this annual income comes from fishing?[ ] 0% [ ] 1 - 20% [ ] 21 - 40% [ ] 41 - 60% [ ] 61 - 80% [ ] 81 - 100% [ ] N/A

(9) What percentage of this annual income comes from gleaning?[ ] 0% [ ] 1 - 20% [ ] 21 - 40% [ ] 41 - 60% [ ] 61 - 80% [ ] 81 - 100% [ ] N/A

Section 3Trusted Sources of Information & Media Access/Exposure

(10) People hear information about the environment from many different sources. I am going to read you a list of sources from which you might hear information about the environment, and I would like you to tell me whether you would find that source "Most trustworthy, Very trustworthy, Somewhat trustworthy, or Not trustworthy.

100

(A) Person on the radio[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(B) Person on Television[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(C) Report in newspaper or magazine[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(D) Law enforcement officer[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(E) National government officials[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(F) Local government officials[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(G) Local community leaders[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(H) Religious leaders[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(I) Friends or family members[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(J) Teachers[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(K) Scientist[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(L) Information on poster or billboard[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

101

(M) Information in printed booklet[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(N) Information from puppet show[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(O) Information from public meeting[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(P) Conservation group volunteer[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(Q) Celebrity/Soap Star/Entertainer[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(R) NGO workers[ ] Most trustworthy [ ] Very trustworthy [ ] Somewhat trustworthy [ ] Not Trustworthy [ ] Not sure/Don't know

(11) What person would you trust the most (from list above or other) if they told you something about the environment?[ ] person on radio [ ] person on television [ ] Newswriter (newspaper or magazine) [ ] law enforcement officer [ ] national government official [ ] local government official [ ] local community leaders [ ] religious leaders [ ] friends or family members [ ] teachers [ ] Scientist [ ] Person on poster or billboard [ ] Information from printed booklets [ ] Information from puppet shows [ ] Information from public meetings [ ] Conservation group volunteer [ ] Celebrity/ soap star/ entertainer [ ] NGO workers [ ] Others [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(12) Among the person I will mention here, who would you trust most if they told you something the environment?[ ] Kuya Kim [ ] Cesar Montano [ ] Richard Guttierez [ ] KC Concepcion [ ] Venuz Raj [ ] Dingdong Dantes [ ] None of the above [ ] Others

(13) Among the person I will mention here, who would you trust most if they told you something about the environment?[ ] Rich Asuncion [ ] Atty. Jess Tirol [ ] Bishop Medroso [ ] Mary Leine Shane Karaan [ ] Loreto Palapos [ ] None of the above [ ] Other ________________

(14) In the past month, how frequent you listened radio?[ ] Never [ ] Up to 3 days per week [ ] 4 to 6 days per week [ ] 7 days per week [ ] N/A

102

(A) When you listen to the radio, which radio stations are your preferred stations? Please choose only two stations.[ ] DYTR FM [ ] DYTR AM [ ] DYRD FM [ ] DYRD AM [ ] No favorite station [ ] Don't know [ ] I don't listen to radio

[ ] Others_ _________

(B) When you listen to the radio, what is your favorite type of program that you like to listen to? Please indicate up to two program types that you like to listen to.

[ ] Local music [ ] Foreign music [ ] News [ ] Sports [ ] Talk shows [ ] Dramas [ ] Religious [ ] No favorite[ ] Don't listen to radio [ ] Other ________________

(C) When you listen to the radio during the week, Monday to Friday, what are the most likely times for you to listen to the radio? Please indicate up to 2 times during the day when you are most likely to listen.

[ ] Before 6:00 a.m. [ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. [ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. [ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. [ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. [ ] After 10:00 p.m. [ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day [ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch/listen

(D) When you listen to the radio during the weekend, Saturday and Sunday, what are the most likely times for you to listen to the radio? Please indicate up to 2 times during the day when you are likely to listen.

[ ] Before 6:00 a.m. [ ] 6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. [ ] 10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. [ ] 2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. [ ] 6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. [ ] After 10:00 p.m. [ ] No particular time [ ] Off and on all day [ ] Don't know [ ] Don't watch/listen

(15) In the past month, how frequent you read a newspaper or magazine?[ ] Never [ ] Up to 3 days per week [ ] 4 to 6 days per week [ ] 7 days per week [ ] N/A

(A) Which newspaper or magazine do you usually read. Please tell me up to three publications that you read most often.

[ ] Daily Enquirer [ ] Bohol Chronicle [ ] Manila Bulletin [ ] Bohol Sunday Post [ ] The Bohol Times [ ] The Bohol Standard [ ] No favorite [ ] Don't know [ ] Don't read [ ] Other ________________

(16) I am going to list some different types of media programs, and I would like you to tell me how much you like each program type. Do you like it the most, like it a lot, like it a little, or not like it?

(A) Original Pilipino Music (OPM)[ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

103

(B) Traditional Music[ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(C) Local news[ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(D) National news[ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(E) Sports[ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(F) Religious programs[ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(G) Talk show programs[ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(H) Dramas[ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(I) Comedy[ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(J) You-tube[ ] Like the most [ ] Like a lot [ ] Like a little [ ] Not liked

(K) What other types of media programs do you like to watch, listen to, or read about?________________

Section 4Assign Respondent to Stage-of-Behavior-Change

(17) Do you glean or fish or both? (choose on only)

104

[ ] yes I glean [ ] yes I fish [ ] yes I glean and fish[ ] no I don't glean and don't fish [ ] N/A

(18) (If respondent said no I don't fish and I don't glean in previous question then don't ask question and select "behavior is not relevant to this respondent")

I am going to read you a list of 6 statement about whether or not you have gone fishing or gleaning in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months. I want you to listen to all 6 statements, then tell me which one statement best represents you:[ ] I have never considered stopping fishing/gleaning in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. [ ] I have considered stopping fishing/gleaning in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary but do not want to stop doing so [ ] I intend to stop fishing/gleaning in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in the next 6 months but have not done so yet [ ] I have talked to someone about stopping fishing/gleaning in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months, but have not stopped yet. [ ] I have only gone fishing/gleaning in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary a few times in the past 6 months [ ] I have not fished/gleaned in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months[ ] Behavior is not relevant for this respondent

(19) In the last 6 months, have you heard of anyone reporting someone breaking the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary rules and regulations to the enforcement team?[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Unsure [ ] N/A

(20) In the last 6 months, have you heard of anyone taking part of any Mabaw Marine Sanctuary related activities?[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know [ ] Not Applicable

Section 5Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Knowledge SMART Objectives

Now, I would like to ask you some questions about the local environment and wildlife that live in this area.

(21) Please tell me what you know about the following statements:

(A) To catch, gather, collect, disturb or kill fish and other marine aquatic inside Mabaw MS is prohibited.[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(B) Only Hook and Line fishing is allowed inside the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(C) Is it allowed to conduct research permitted by the city government inside Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

105

(D) Passage of boats in emergency situation and for law enforcement activities inside the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(E) After five years of no fishing being allowed, the MMS can be harvested again[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(F) No person shall be allowed to establish fish traps and fish aggregating devices within the core zone.[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(G) No one can catch fish or collect shells in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary[ ] True [ ] False [ ] Unsure

(22) Some of the questions I am going to ask you are about the no-take fishing area that has been created in your local area. A no-take fishing area is a clearly identified area where no fish are allowed to be caught at any time by anyone.(COHORT QUESTION)

(A) Are there any benefits to the local community from having a no-take area nearby? (If respondent answers YES then please also ask next question)COHORT QUESTION)[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(B) (Ask only of those who said yes to previous question) What local community benefits are there from having the no-take area nearby? You can tell me up to 3 that you know. (Do NOT read out answers but tick as appropriate or add to other)(COHORT QUESTION)[ ] more fish [ ] area for fish to reproduce [ ] bigger fish [ ] bigger or better coral / habitat for fish [ ] more fertile fish

[ ] bank of the sea / food security [ ] better regulation/management of fishing activities[ ] no more destructive fishing in that area [ ] community ownership [ ] new skills [ ] better/new access to tourism [ ] better community cohesion [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(23) I am going to read you a list of people, and I would like you to tell me for each one how much you believe they have been involved during the past 6 months in important management decisions, such as in determining the size and location of your local no-take fishing area. Were these individuals regularly involved, occasionally involved, or never involved? (COHORT QUESTION)

106

(A) National Government officials[ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] Not sure/ Don't know

(B) Local Government officials[ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] Not sure/ Don't know

(C) Local leaders[ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] Not sure/ Don't know

(D) Local fishers[ ] Regularly [ ] Occasionally [ ] Never [ ] Not sure/ Don't know

(24) I am going to read you a list of people, and I would like you to tell me for each one how much you believe that during the past 6 months they have been able to determine the regulations for your local no-take fishing area. Were these individuals the most important decision makers, involved but not the decision makers, or not involved in decision-making?(COHORT QUESTION)

(A) National Government officials[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know

(B) Local Government officials[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know

(C) Scientists and/or fisheries experts[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know

(D) Local leaders[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know

(E) Local fishers[ ] Most involved [ ] Involved [ ] Not involved [ ] Not sure / Don't know

Section 6Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Attitude SMART Objectives

107

(25) Please state below whether you agree or disagree with the following statements on the possible impacts on the local community if the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Rules/Policies are not strictly observed by fishers:

(A) Fish species will continue to decline in number or disappear[ ] Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Strongly Disagree

(B) The corals begin to die when the fish are taken away[ ] Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Strongly Disagree

(C) The local community will be poorer and less united[ ] Strongly Agree [ ] Agree [ ] Disagree [ ] Strongly Disagree

(26) What is your level of support for increasing the enforcement of the regulations of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary? [ ] Strongly do not support the increase in enforcment [ ] Do not support the increase in enforcement [ ] Support the increase in enforcement [ ] Strongly support the increase in enforcement [ ] Unsure

(27) What do you think of the size of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary?[ ] Too Big [ ] Too Small [ ] Just the right size [ ] Unsure [ ] N/A

(28) Who would you trust most to head and govern the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee? (Choose one only)[ ] Community member [ ] Fishers/Gleaners [ ] National Police [ ] Non-government officials [ ] Barangay officials [ ] City government officials [ ] National government officials [ ] Private sector [ ] Academic Sector [ ] Other ________________

(29) Has your catch increased, decreased or stayed the same as a result of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary? (If the person does not fish or glean mark as NA)[ ] Decreased [ ] Increased [ ] Stayed the Same [ ] N/A

(30) I am going to read to you a number of activities, and I would like you to tell me whether you would find it easy or difficult for you to do that activity.

(A) Attend at least 6 meetings of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee in 12 months[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult [ ] Not sure [ ] N/A

(B) Sign a petition to request better enforcement of the regulations in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult [ ] Not sure [ ] N/A

108

(C) Run a Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Committee every month[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult [ ] Not sure [ ] N/A

(D) Attend community assemblies regarding Mabaw Marine Sanctuary[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult [ ] Not sure [ ] N/A

(E) Act as community intelligence to the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary[ ] Easy [ ] Difficult [ ] Not sure [ ] N/A


(A) There is a clear plan for how the no-take area will be managed[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(B) Local village fishers regularly participate in management decisions of the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(C) Local people know boundaries of the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(D) There was not enough planning done before the no-take area was established[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(E) There is enough money and other resources to fully manage and enforce the rules of the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(F) The rules of the no-take area are regularly enforced so that violators are caught and punished[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(G) The rules of the no-take area are unclear and local fishers don't understand them[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(H) The rules of the no-take area are designed more to protect the fish than to help the fishers

109

[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(I) The infrastructure, equipment and facilities to enforce the rules of the no-take area are adequate[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(J) There is an adequate communications program about the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(K) Staff of the no-take area are adequately trained[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(L) There is a regular management effectiveness assessment conducted for the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(M) Research and monitoring activities of the no take area are adequate[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(N) There are no current problems with the no-take area management[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

Section 7Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Interpersonal Communication SMART Objectives

(32) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about benefits to the community of a well enforced sanctuary? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. [ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner [ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws [ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older [ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger [ ] Talked to friend or neighbor [ ] Talked to village elder [ ] Talked to National government environmental officials [ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials

[ ] Talked to Local government environmental officials [ ] Talked to a Local Mabaw Fisher or Gleaner[ ] Other ________________

(A) If you did talk, what was the main thing you discussed?[ ] Increase fish and corals [ ] Increase income [ ] Livelihood [ ] ecotourism project [ ] Knowledge to protect marine resources

[ ] Others_________ [ ] N/A

110

(33) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about your roles in the proper management of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in order to benefit their community? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. [ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner [ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws [ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older [ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger [ ] Talked to friend or neighbor [ ] Talked to village elder [ ] Talked to National government environmental officials [ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials


(A) If you did talk about this, what was the main thing you discussed? [ ] Composition and function of the Mabam Marine Sanctuary Management Committee [ ] Coordination of the City LGU to the Management Committee [ ] Sharing of revenues from user fees, fines and penalty [ ] Sanction for members of the management team violating Mabaw MS ordinance [ ] None of the above [ ] Others________________________ [ ] N/A

(34) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about "the consequences of breaking the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary laws, rules & regulations"? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about this. [ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/partner [ ] Talked to parents, or in-laws [ ] Talked to your children aged 16 or older [ ] Talked to your children aged 15 or younger [ ] Talked to friend or neighbor [ ] Talked to village elder [ ] Talked to National government environmental officials [ ] Talked to Non-government environment officials


(A) If you did talk about this, what was the main thing you discussed? [ ] Fines and penalty [ ] Expulsion from the membership of the management committee [ ] Revocation and non-renewal of fishing permit [ ] Expulsion from Fisher's organization membership [ ] Expulsion from coastal law enforcement team

[ ] None of the above [ ] Others [ ] N/A

(35) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anybody about your role in reporting intrusions into the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Mabaw Marine Sanctuary? If you have, please tell me of the people whom you talked to about this.

[ ] Have not talked to anyone [ ] Talked to spouse/ partner [ ] Talk to parents, or in-laws [ ] Talked to my children aged 16 or older[ ] Talked to my children aged 15 or younger[ ] Talked to National Government Environmental Official [ ] Talk

to Non-government Environmental Officials [ ] Talked to Local Government Environmental Officials [ ] Talked to local Mabaw Fisher or Gleaner [ ] Other:_________

Section 8Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Behavior SMART Objectives

111

(36) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 6 months (show the NTZ on a map of the area but don't mention whether it is NTZ or not)COHORT QUESTION - SHOW MAP LABELLED A (EACH CF WILL HAVE TO CREATE THEIR OWN MAP)

(A) Subsistence fishers from your village[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(B) Subsistence fishers from nearby villages[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(C) Subsistence fishers from outside areas[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(D) Small scale commercial fishers from your village[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(E) Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(F) Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(G) Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc [ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(H) Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls, purse seiner[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(I) Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish, marlins etc[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(J) Other resource users specializing in target fish such as aquarium fish, mollusks (trochus) and live fish etc[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

112

(37) I am going to read you a list of different types of fishers, and for each one, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing someone like that fishing in this area in the past 1 year (show an area that is NOT a NTZ on a map of the area but don’t mention whether it is NTZ or not)COHORT QUESTION - SHOW MAP LABELLED B (EACH CF WILL HAVE TO CREATE THEIR OWN MAP)

(A) Subsistence fishers from your village[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(B) Subsistence fishers from nearby villages[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(C) Subsistence fishers from outside areas[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(D) Small scale commercial fishers from your village[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(E) Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(F) Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(G) Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc [ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(H) Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls, purse seiner[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(I) Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish, marlins etc[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

(J) Other resource users specializing in target fish such as aquarium fish, mollusks (trochus) and live fish etc[ ] Seen [ ] Not seen [ ] Not sure / Don't remember

113

(38) During the past 6 months, would you say that you have been regularly involved, occasionally involved, or not involved with the creation and/or the management of a no-take fishing area in your local area(COHORT QUESTION)

(A) [ ] Regularly involved [ ] Occasionally involved [ ] Never involved [ ] Don't know / not applicable

(39) If you were to report someone who has broken the rules and regulations of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary, who would you report them to? You can choose more than one answer.[ ] Local police [ ] Bantay Dagat [ ] Barangay captain [ ] City mayor [ ] Next door neighbor [ ] Husband/ wife [ ] fisher [ ] would not report [ ] other:

Section 9Understand Barriers & Benefits of Behavior Change

(40) What barriers might there be establishing the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management committee?( Do not read out options to the respondents) [ ] Lack of interest [ ] Political intervention [ ] Lack of legal support to establish the committee [ ] Lack of budget [ ] Unclear management structure [ ] Lack of knowledge on the importance of Management council [ ] Conflicting interest of involve individuals [ ] Not a priority [ ] None of the above [ ] Others: __________

(41) If you were to encourage a friend to stop intruding in the MPA to fish, what would you suggest would be a good incentive?[ ] receive public recognition by the Mayor [ ] receive public recognition in the media [ ] be celebrated at a fiesta [ ] receive an award [ ] knowing that you are protecting the food security of the children in the community [ ] more and bigger fish in the future [ ] Other ________________

(42) If you were to encourage a friend to take part in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management meetings, what would you suggest would be a good incentive?[ ] receive public recognition by the Mayor [ ] receive public recognition in the media [ ] be celebrated at a fiesta [ ] receive an award [ ] knowing that you are protecting the food security of the children in the community [ ] more and bigger fish in the future [ ] Other ________________

Section 10Exposure to Campaign Activities & Messages

114

(43) I am going to ask you about a number of ways in which you may or may not have seen or heard about the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. For each method, I would like you to tell me whether you remember seeing or hearing that source in the past 6 months.

(A) Local newspapers[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(B) Local radio stations[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(C) Religious program/ activities[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(D) Local Television[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(E) Poster or billboard[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(F) Printed Booklet[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(G) Public Meeting (Festival)[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Don't know

(44) Of all of the different ways in which you remember seeing or hearing about Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months, which one, if any, did you think had the most impact on you?________________

(45) Of all the different ways in which you learned about Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months, what do you think was the most important message that you learned from them?________________

Section 11Ground truthing - no objective

115

(46) Please name 3 creatures that are found in Tagbilaran seawaters that you are particularly fond or proud of? Do not read out options, but tick box as appropriate and/or fill the blank for any additional answers.

FLAGSHIP SPECIES[ ] Parrotfish [ ] Snapper fish [ ] Butterflyfish [ ] Clownlfish (nemo) [ ] giant clam [ ] sea turtle [ ] Starfish [ ] Rabbit fish [ ] N/A [ ] Others__________ [ ] Other ________________ [ ] N/A

(47) Please have a look at the 4 photographs labeled A,B,C,D. Which of the sea creatures shown on the photographs do you like the best. (FLAGSHIP SPECIES)[ ] Clownfish [ ] Parrotfish [ ] Goatfish [ ] Rabbitfish

(48) I am going to read you a number of strategies that might help solve any possible current problems in the management of your local no-take area. For each strategy, I would like you to tell me if you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree that it would help solve any current problems with managing the no-take area.COHORT QUESTION

(A) Increased local community involvement in management of the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(B) Limiting involvement in management of the no-take area to fishers only[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(C) Increased and strict law enforcement of the no-take area rules by Police / Navy and Enforcers[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(D) Increased and strict law enforcement of rules by local community fishers with enforcement rights[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(E) Develop new rules for the no-take area in a process that includes the whole community[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(F) Change the size and/or the location of the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(G) Make sure that local fishers have the exclusive right to fish in the areas around the no-take area[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

116

(49) Do you strongly agree (SA), agree (A), disagree (D), strongly disagree (SD), Not sure/Don't know (NS/DK) with the following statement:

(A) Climate change is not going to cause any problems in my community[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(B) Climate change is already a problem in my community[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(C) Climate change is likely to become a real problem for my community in the coming 5-10 years[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(D) If our local NTZ is well managed it will help buffer some of the effects of climate change in the future[ ] SA [ ] A [ ] D [ ] SD [ ] NS/DK

(50) Name up to 3 ways in which you believe climate change could affect your community in the next 5-10 years (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS - SELECT UP TO 3)[ ] sea level rise [ ] increased water temperature leading death of corals and less fish [ ] ncrease of typhoon frequency

[ ] increase of typhoon strength, less reliable work and crops [ ] more people from the upland will move to the coastal areas in case of crop failure [ ] change in weather patterns [ ] less rain [ ] N/A [ ] others [ ] Other ________________

Thank you for all of your help in responding to this anonymous questionnaire survey

117

1.Survey results

Section 1: Background Information

118

Section 2: Socio-economic and Demographic Questions

Target Audience

Age

TA 2A ( Taloto local community) random 22.4%, 208

TA 2B (Ubujan local community) random 17.5%, 163

TA 4A (Manga resident fishers) pre-selected 16.8%, 156

TA 1B (Ubujan resident fishers) pre-selected 11.5%, 107

TA 5 (City officials and employees) pre-selected 9.1%, 85

TA 4B ( Booy resident fishers) pre-selected 8.4%, 78

TA 3 (Management committee) pre-selected 8.0%, 74

TA 1A (Taloto resident fishers) pre-selected

6.3%, 59

(1) How old were you at your last birthday? 14 or younger

0.5% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

15 to 19 1.4% 15.3% 0.0% 0.9% 1.2% 2.6% 5.4% 1.7%

20 to 24 5.8% 7.4% 0.6% 6.5% 2.4% 1.3% 4.1% 1.7%

25 to 29 6.3% 10.4% 1.3% 7.5% 12.9% 3.8% 8.1% 8.5%

30 to 34 13.5% 11.0% 10.3% 11.2% 9.4% 6.4% 9.5% 15.3%

35 to 39 13.0% 19.0% 6.4% 15.0% 14.1% 7.7% 21.6% 18.6%

40 to 44 13.0% 11.7% 19.9% 10.3% 12.9% 12.8% 18.9% 10.2%

45 to 49 17.3% 6.7% 23.1% 20.6% 17.6% 17.9% 12.2% 8.5%

50 to 54 9.6% 3.7% 16.7% 20.6% 14.1% 21.8% 5.4% 6.8%

55 or older 19.7% 14.1% 21.8% 7.5% 15.3% 25.6% 14.9% 28.8%

121

Target Audience:

School








TA 1A (Taloto resident fishers) pre-selected 6.3%, 59

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(2) School Primary level 1.9% 8.0% 1.3% 5.6% 0.0% 6.4% 0.0% 0.0%

Elementary Level 2.4% 4.9% 25.0% 21.5% 1.2% 23.1% 0.0% 20.3%

Elementary Graduate 9.6% 11.7% 23.1% 27.1% 0.0% 39.7% 5.4% 32.2%

Seconday Level 22.6% 9.2% 32.1% 32.7% 1.2% 12.8% 6.8% 27.1%

Secondary Graduate 18.8% 14.7% 7.7% 8.4% 2.4% 1.3% 10.8% 15.3%

College Level 21.2% 22.1% 7.7% 3.7% 11.8% 5.1% 23.0% 3.4%

Gollege Graduate 19.2% 17.2% 3.2% 0.9% 77.6% 10.3% 51.4% 0.0%

Post Graduate School 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.5% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0%

Vocational School 2.9% 10.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0%

Refuse to answer 1.0% 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 1.4% 1.7%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

122

The highest number of respondents were aged 55 or older ( 18%). This followed by respondents aged 45 to 49 (15%), 35 to 39 (13.9%), 40 to 44 (13.7%), 50 to 54 (11.9%), 30 to 34 (11.0) and 15 to 19 years old has the lowest number of respondents. Both resident and non-resident fishers in Mabaw reefs communities fall under ages 45 to 49 (19.3%), followed by 50 to 54 (17.3%) and 40 to 44 (14.5%). A few of the respondents fishers were ages 15 to 19 (1%) and 20- 24 (2.5%).

Majority of the respondent graduated from college (19.5%). This figure is close to those respondent who were in the secondary level (19.4%). Followed by elementary graduate (17.1%), college level ( 13.9%), elementary level (11.5%), secondary level (11.4%) and a few of them reached primary (3.2%) and vocational school (2.7%). Most of the resident and non-resident fishers in Mabaw Communities finished elementary (28.8%), others on secondary level (27.8), elementary level (23%) and college level (22%). A few of them graduated college (3.5%)

(3) Religion

Target Audience:

Overall (934)

Local community (TA2) (39.9%, 371)

Non-resident fishers (TA4) (25.2%, 234)

Resident fishers (TA1) (17.8%, 166)

TA 5 (City officials and employees) pre-selected (9.1%, 85)

TA 3 (Management committee) pre-selected (8.0%, 74)

Percent0 100

Roman catholic 848 91.4%

345 93.0%

217 93.5%

135 82.3%

79 95.2%

69 93.2%

Iglesia Filipina Indipendente (IFI)

10 1.1%

1 0.3%

0 0.0%

9 5.5%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

Iglesia Ni Kristo 25 2.7%

6 1.6%

2 0.9%

17 10.4%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

Protestant 3 0.3%

2 0.5%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

123

Refuses to answer 3 0.3%

2 0.5%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

None 3 0.3%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

1 0.6%

2 2.4%

0 0.0%

Baptist 2 0.2%

1 0.3%

1 0.4%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

born again 3 0.3%

0 0.0%

2 0.9%

1 0.6%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

islam 8 0.9%

7 1.9%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

muslim 6 0.6%

6 1.6%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

One Way 3 0.3%

0 0.0%

3 1.3%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

saksi ni jehova 3 0.3%

0 0.0%

3 1.3%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

welder 2 0.2%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

1 0.6%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

Other 9 1.0%

1 0.3%

4 1.7%

0 0.0%

2 2.4%

2 2.7%

Totals 928 100.0%

371 100.0%

232 100.0%

164 100.0%

83 100.0%

74 100.0%

Majority of the respondents are Roman Catholic (91.45), and other belong to (Iglesia ni Kristo (2.7%), Iglesia Filipina Indipendente (1.1%) and other religion.

124

Target Audience:

Primary Occupation









(4) What is your primary occupation? [choose one only] Fishing

72.9%; 43

85.0%; 91 1.0%; 2 0.6%; 1 4.1%; 3 89.1%;

13970.5%; 55 0.0%; 0

Farming 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 4 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Gleaning 1.7%; 1 9.3%; 10 0.5%; 1 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 2 5.1%; 4 0.0%; 0

Small business (shop keeper or sales person) 0.0%; 0 0.9%; 1 13.9%; 29 6.7%; 11 5.5%; 4 1.3%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Office work 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 4.8%; 10 5.5%; 9 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.2%; 1

Food preparation or restaurant 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 3.8%; 8 0.6%; 1 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Professional (Lawyer, Health care provider) 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 4 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Handicrafts 1.7%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.5%; 1 1.8%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Transportation (shipping, trucking, rail) 0.0%; 0 0.9%; 1 4.3%; 9 1.2%; 2 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Education 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 3 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

125

housework 1.7%; 1 0.9%; 1 9.1%; 19 13.5%; 22 1.4%; 1 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Student 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.4%; 5 14.7%; 24 4.1%; 3 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 0.0%; 0

Not currently employed 1.7%; 1 0.0%; 0 2.9%; 6 1.2%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Target Audience:









non-governmental organisation 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 3.7%; 6 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 1.2%; 1

self employed 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 18.3%; 38 24.5%; 40 6.8%; 5 3.2%; 5 1.3%; 1 4.7%; 4

government (local) 1.7%; 1 2.8%; 3 6.7%; 14 13.5%; 22 63.0%; 46 1.3%; 2 6.4%; 5 78.8%; 67

government (state or national) 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 3 0.0%; 0 4.1%; 3 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 8.2%; 7

care taker 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Carpenter 3.4%; 2 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 3 2.6%; 2 0.0%; 0

construction worker 5.1%; 3 0.0%; 0 3.8%; 8 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Driver 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 5.1%; 4 0.0%; 0

fish vendor 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.5%; 1 1.2%; 2 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Housewife 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.4%; 5 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 0.0%; 0

Labandera 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Laborer 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.6%; 2 0.0%; 0

126

Mazon 1.7%; 1 0.9%; 1 1.9%; 4 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Mechanic 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.2%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Welder 1.7%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Other 3.4%; 2 0.0%; 0 8.2%; 17 4.3%; 7 1.4%; 1 0.6%; 1 2.6%; 2 2.4%; 2

Not Applicable 3.4%; 2 0.0%; 0 3.4%; 7 2.5%; 4 4.1%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 3.5%; 3

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Target Audience:

Secondary Occupation









(5) What is your secondary occupation? [choose one only] Fishing

25.4%; 15

17.8%; 19 4.8%; 10 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 32.1%;

5015.4%; 12 0.0%; 0

Farming 6.8%; 4 8.4%; 9 1.9%; 4 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.6%; 1 3.8%; 3 3.6%; 3

Gleaning 18.6%; 11

16.8%; 18 2.9%; 6 0.6%; 1 1.4%; 1 3.8%; 6 2.6%; 2 0.0%; 0

Small business (shop keeper or sales 5.1%; 3 4.7%; 5 3.8%; 8 7.4%; 12 8.1%; 6 1.3%; 2 0.0%; 0 3.6%; 3

127

person)

Office work 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.5%; 1 2.5%; 4 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.2%; 1

Food preparation or restaurant 0.0%; 0 0.9%; 1 2.4%; 5 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.4%; 2

Transportation (shipping, trucking, rail) 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.5%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.2%; 1

Housework 1.7%; 1 4.7%; 5 3.8%; 8 14.7%; 24 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 3 5.1%; 4 15.5%; 13

Student 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 3 11.7%; 19 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 0.0%; 0

Not currently employed 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

self employed 3.4%; 2 3.7%; 4 4.8%; 10 9.8%; 16 5.4%; 4 5.8%; 9 2.6%; 2 2.4%; 2

government (local) 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 2 0.5%; 1 1.2%; 2 2.7%; 2 0.6%; 1 1.3%; 1 3.6%; 3

government (state or national) 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.6%; 1 1.4%; 1 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.2%; 1

Target Audience:









barangay tanod 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Carpentry 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 3.8%; 3 0.0%; 0

construction worker 3.4%; 2 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 3 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Driver 0.0%; 0 0.9%; 1 1.0%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

fish vendor 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

128

Labada 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 3 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 0.0%; 0

Labor 10.2%; 6 3.7%; 4 0.5%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 15.4%; 12 0.0%; 0

Manglitsonay 0.0%; 0 0.9%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Masonry 3.4%; 2 0.9%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Other 1.7%; 1 0.9%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Panday 1.7%; 1 0.9%; 1 0.5%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Pintor 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.5%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Tanod 0.0%; 0 0.9%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 0.0%; 0

Other 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 2 4.3%; 9 1.2%; 2 4.1%; 3 1.9%; 3 2.6%; 2 3.6%; 3

Not Applicable 18.6%; 11

27.1%; 29 61.5%; 128 49.7%; 81 68.9%; 51 44.9%;

7043.6%; 34 61.9%; 52

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

(6) How many people live in your household?

Target Audience:

Overall (934)

TA2: local community (39.9%, 371)

TA4: Non-resident fishers (25.2%,

TA1: resident fishers (17.8%,

TA 5 (City officials and employees) pre-selected (9.1%,


Percents0 100

129

234) 166) 85)

1 (me) 9 1.0%

2 0.5%

4 1.7%

3 1.8%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

2 53 5.8%

17 4.6%

13 5.6%

11 6.6%

7 8.8%

5 6.9%

3 93 10.1%

43 11.7%

13 5.6%

17 10.2%

7 8.8%

13 18.1%

4 181 19.7%

84 23.0%

36 15.5%

26 15.7%

16 20.0%

18 25.0%

5 201 21.8%

83 22.7%

42 18.0%

39 23.5%

23 28.8%

14 19.4%

6 161 17.5%

58 15.8%

49 21.0%

30 18.1%

13 16.3%

10 13.9%

7 98 10.7%

37 10.1%

30 12.9%

14 8.4%

9 11.3%

7 9.7%

8 56 6.1%

16 4.4%

23 9.9%

13 7.8%

3 3.8%

1 1.4%

9 19 2.1%

8 2.2%

4 1.7%

6 3.6%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

10 16 1.7%

7 1.9%

6 2.6%

2 1.2%

1 1.3%

0 0.0%

More than 10 33 3.6%

11 3.0%

13 5.6%

5 3.0%

1 1.3%

3 4.2%

Totals 920 100.0%

366 100.0%

233 100.0%

166 100.0%

80 100.0%

72 100.0%

130

Most of the respondents have five members in the family (21.9%), others have 4 members in the family (19.8%), 6 members (17.6%), and only a few have reach 10 members of the family ( 3.6%).

For the resident and non-resident fishers respondents, there were 20.3% who have 5 member in the family, 19.8% of them have six members, 15.5% who have 4 members. There were also fishers who reach 8 ( 9%), 9 (2.5%) and 10 (2.%) and more than ten (4.5%).

Income: Per TA

(7) In the past calendar year, from January to December, what is your best estimate of the total income earned by all family members that currently live in the same home with your. Again, this information

Target Audience:

Overall (934)

TA2: Local community (39.9%, 371)

TA1 Fisher of Taloto and Ubujan (17.8%, 166)

6: TA 4A (Manga resident fishers) pre-selected (16.8%, 156)


7: TA 4B ( Booy resident fishers) pre-selected (8.4%, 78)


Percents0 100

Below 30,000 Pesos W 139 14.9%

34 9.2%

27 16.4%

42 26.9%

5 6.0%

26 33.3%

4 5.5%

Between 30,000 and 50,000 256 27.5%

88 23.7%

65 39.4%

71 45.5%

5 6.0%

14 17.9%

12 16.4%

Between 50,001 and 75,000 115 12.4%

58 15.6%

27 16.4%

6 3.8%

0 0.0%

11 14.1%

13 17.8%

Between 75,001 and 100,000 77 8.3%

24 6.5%

2 1.2%

3 1.9%

19 22.6%

15 19.2%

14 19.2%

Greater than 100,000 Pesos W 100 10.8%

34 9.2%

8 4.8%

1 0.6%

30 35.7%

10 12.8%

17 23.3%

131

Not sure 150 16.1%

83 22.4%

29 17.6%

18 11.5%

12 14.3%

2 2.6%

6 8.2%

Refused 93 10.0%

50 13.5%

7 4.2%

15 9.6%

13 15.5%

0 0.0%

7 9.6%

Totals 930 100.0%

371 100.0%

165 100.0%

156 100.0%

84 100.0%

78 100.0%

73 100.0%

Percentage of fisher's annual income derive from fishing

(8) Copy of What percentage of this annual income comes from fishing?

Target Audience:

Overall (934)

Resident and non-resident fishers (43.0%, 400)

TA 2A ( Taloto local community) random (22.4%, 208)

TA 2B (Ubujan local community) random (17.5%, 163)



Percents0 100

0% 300 33.0%

24 6.0%

149 72.0%

88 54.0%

8 12.3%

29 39.2%

1 - 20% 41 4.5%

27 6.8%

7 3.4%

3 1.8%

0 0.0%

3 4.1%

21 - 40% 120 13.2%

104 26.2%

9 4.3%

6 3.7%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

41 - 60% 69 7.6%

57 14.4%

1 0.5%

7 4.3%

3 4.6%

1 1.4%

61 - 80% 83 9.1%

76 19.1%

1 0.5%

4 2.5%

0 0.0%

2 2.7%

132

81 - 100% 105 11.6%

103 25.9%

0 0.0%

1 0.6%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

N/A 191 21.0%

6 1.5%

40 19.3%

54 33.1%

54 83.1%

37 50.0%

Totals 909 100.0%

397 100.0%

207 100.0%

163 100.0%

65 100.0%

74 100.0%

Majority of the respondent’s annual income is between PhP30,000 and PhP50,000. This followed by below PhP30,000 (15%), between 50,001 (12.4%) and greater than 100,000 (10.8%). Several respondents are not sure (16.2%) of their annual income and other refused (9.7%) to reveal.Most of the resident and non-resident fisher’s annual income is between PhP30,000 to PhP50,000 (37.6%). This is followed by those whose income belonged to below PhP30,000 (23.8%), between PhP50-75,000 (11%) and greater than PhP100,000 (4.8%). Some fishers answered not sure (12.3%) as to their annual income and others refused (5.5%) to divulge.

Percentage of Income of the resident and non-resident fishers derived from gleaning

(9) What percentage of this annual income comes from gleaning?

Target Audience:

Overall (934)






Percents0 100

0% 476 52.9%

183 47.3%

152 73.4%

98 60.1%

9 13.8%

31 41.9%

1 - 20% 69 47 9 7 0 6

133

7.7% 12.1% 4.3% 4.3% 0.0% 8.1%

21 - 40% 41 4.6%

34 8.8%

5 2.4%

1 0.6%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

41 - 60% 25 2.8%

21 5.4%

0 0.0%

2 1.2%

2 3.1%

0 0.0%

61 - 80% 4 0.4%

4 1.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

81 - 100% 30 3.3%

30 7.8%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

N/A 254 28.3%

68 17.6%

41 19.8%

55 33.7%

54 83.1%

36 48.6%

Totals 899 100.0%

387 100.0%

207 100.0%

163 100.0%

65 100.0%

74 100.0%

There were 26.2% fisher respondents said that 21-40% of their annual income derived from fishing, other said 81-100% (25.9%), 61-80% (19.1%) and 41-60% (14.4%).

Section 3: Trusted Sources of Information

Of the different sources of information, the target audiences find the following sources of information as very trustworthy: person on radio, person on TV, newspaper, local law enforcement officer, national government official, local government official, local community leaders, religious leaders, friends and family, teachers, scientist, information from public meeting, conservation group volunteer and NGO workers. The information from billboard, information from printed booklet, information from puppet shows and celebrity/ entertainer are considered as the somewhat trusted sources of information.

134

In the city of Tagbilaran, the popular sources of information include local radio stations and the newspapers. Based on the opinion of the resident and non-resident fishers in Mabaw Communities to person on radio as a source of information, KAP survey results showed the following results: very trustworthy (61.5%), somewhat trustworthy (17.6%) , most trustworthy (14.6%), not sure/ don’t know (4.8%) and not trustworthy ( 1.5%).

Opinion of target audiences on person on radio as a source of information

(A) Person on the radio

Target Audience:

Overall (934)

TA2: combine local community (39.9%, 371)

TA4: non-resident fishers (25.2%, 234)

TA1: Resident fishers (17.8%, 166)



Percents0 100

Most trustworthy 141 15.2%

62 16.8%

20 8.7%

38 22.9%

11 13.1%

10 13.7%

Very trustworthy 553 59.7%

224 60.5%

159 68.8%

85 51.2%

33 39.3%

49 67.1%

Somewhat trustworthy 176 19.0%

63 17.0%

42 18.2%

28 16.9%

30 35.7%

13 17.8%

Not Trustworthy 11 1.2%

3 0.8%

3 1.3%

3 1.8%

2 2.4%

0 0.0%

Not sure/Don't know 46 5.0%

18 4.9%

7 3.0%

12 7.2%

8 9.5%

1 1.4%

Totals 927 100.0%

370 100.0%

231 100.0%

166 100.0%

84 100.0%

73 100.0%

135

Opinion of the target audiences on newspaper as a source of information

(C) Report in newspaper or magazine

Target Audience:

Overall (934)

TA2: local community (39.9%, 371)

TA4: non-resident fishers (25.2%, 234)

TA1: resident fishers (17.8%, 166)



Percents0 100

Most trustworthy 101 10.9%

56 15.1%

7 3.0%

21 12.7%

12 14.3%

5 6.8%

Very trustworthy 531 57.3%

226 61.1%

125 54.1%

92 55.4%

36 42.9%

49 67.1%

Somewhat trustworthy 223 24.1%

64 17.3%

85 36.8%

31 18.7%

28 33.3%

15 20.5%

Not Trustworthy 19 2.0%

3 0.8%

7 3.0%

6 3.6%

1 1.2%

2 2.7%

Not sure/Don't know 53 5.7%

21 5.7%

7 3.0%

16 9.6%

7 8.3%

2 2.7%

Totals 927 100.0%

370 100.0%

231 100.0%

166 100.0%

84 100.0%

73 100.0%

Trusted sources of information

Target Audience:

TA 1A (Taloto

TA 1B (Ubujan

TA 2A ( Taloto

TA 2B (Ubujan local

TA 3 (Managem

TA 4A (Manga

TA 4B ( Booy resident

TA 5 (City officials and

136

resident fishers) pre-selected


local community) random

community) random

ent committee) pre-selected


fishers) pre-selected

employees) pre-selected

Person on the radio Not sure/Don't know

6.8%; 4 7.5%; 8 2.9%; 6 7.4%; 12 1.4%; 1 1.3%; 2 6.4%; 5 9.5%; 8

Most/very trustworthy 64.4%; 38 79.4%; 85 75.8%; 157 79.1%; 129 80.8%; 59 80.4%; 123 71.8%; 56 52.4%; 44

Somewhat/ not trustworthy

28.8%; 17 13.1%; 14 21.3%; 44 13.5%; 22 17.8%; 13 18.3%; 28 21.8%; 17 38.1%; 32

Totals 100.0%; 59 100.0%; 107 100.0%; 207 100.0%; 163 100.0%; 73 100.0%; 153 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 84

Person on Television Not sure/Don't know

6.8% 6.5% 1.0% 8.6% 1.4% 0.7% 5.1% 6.0%

Most/very trustworthy 76.3% 82.2% 81.2% 82.8% 80.8% 82.4% 82.1% 65.5%


16.9% 11.2% 17.9% 8.6% 17.8% 17.0% 12.8% 28.6%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Report in newspaper or

15.3% 6.5% 3.9% 8.0% 2.7% 1.3% 6.4% 8.3%

137

magazine Not sure/Don't know



28.8% 18.7% 23.2% 11.7% 23.3% 41.2% 37.2% 34.5%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Target Audience:


TA 1B (Ubujan resident fishers) pre-selected

TA 2A ( Taloto local community) random

TA 2B (Ubujan local community) random

TA 3 (Management committee) pre-selected

TA 4A (Manga resident fishers) pre-selected

TA 4B ( Booy resident fishers) pre-selected

TA 5 (City officials and employees) pre-selected

Mean - - - - - - - -

Law enforcement officer Not sure/Don't know

3.4% 9.3% 3.4% 13.5% 5.5% 2.0% 5.1% 13.1%



37.3% 44.9% 22.2% 19.6% 28.8% 19.0% 38.5% 31.0%

138

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

National government officials Not sure/Don't know

10.2% 16.8% 4.3% 14.1% 4.1% 5.9% 3.8% 11.9%



37.3% 43.0% 26.6% 21.5% 37.0% 35.3% 28.2% 22.6%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Local government officials Not sure/Don't know

10.2% 13.1% 6.8% 12.9% 4.2% 7.2% 2.6% 8.3%



27.1% 50.5% 25.6% 19.0% 38.9% 17.0% 28.2% 23.8%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Target Audience:

139









Mean - - - - - - - -

Local community leaders Not sure/Don't know

3.4% 15.9% 2.9% 11.0% 4.1% 6.5% 3.8% 8.3%



23.7% 44.9% 34.3% 16.0% 34.2% 27.5% 34.6% 33.3%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Religious leaders Not sure/Don't know

10.2% 8.4% 2.4% 4.9% 4.1% 10.5% 2.6% 6.0%


Somewhat/ not

28.8% 34.6% 25.6% 15.4% 19.2% 52.3% 25.6% 27.4%

140

trustworthy

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Friends or family members Not sure/Don't know

10.2% 8.4% 2.4% 6.7% 1.4% 7.2% 5.1% 6.0%



37.3% 25.2% 33.8% 12.9% 16.4% 49.7% 33.3% 26.2%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Target Audience:









Mean - - - - - - - -

Teachers Not sure/Don't know

8.5% 15.0% 1.9% 9.8% 5.6% 7.8% 3.8% 7.1%

Most/very 71.2% 54.2% 78.3% 74.8% 79.2% 52.3% 69.2% 65.5%

141

trustworthy


20.3% 30.8% 19.8% 15.3% 15.3% 39.9% 26.9% 27.4%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Scientist Not sure/Don't know

25.4% 33.6% 8.2% 36.8% 9.6% 20.3% 7.7% 9.5%



40.7% 38.3% 39.1% 19.0% 26.0% 37.3% 42.3% 46.4%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Information on poster or billboard Not sure/Don't know

30.5% 30.8% 14.5% 33.7% 12.7% 7.8% 9.0% 8.3%



57.6% 40.2% 63.3% 21.5% 45.1% 81.7% 56.4% 51.2%

142

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Target Audience:









Mean - - - - - - - -

Information in printed booklet Not sure/Don't know

39.0% 37.4% 15.9% 32.5% 12.5% 15.7% 9.0% 8.3%



55.9% 41.1% 64.7% 26.4% 47.2% 72.5% 57.7% 51.2%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Information from puppet show Not sure/Don't know

42.4% 43.9% 25.6% 36.2% 12.7% 17.6% 7.7% 16.7%

Most/very 6.8% 24.3% 11.6% 43.6% 31.0% 7.8% 14.1% 32.1%

143

trustworthy


50.8% 31.8% 62.8% 20.2% 56.3% 74.5% 78.2% 51.2%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Information from public meeting Not sure/Don't know

6.8% 25.2% 5.3% 9.2% 4.1% 5.3% 1.3% 4.8%



22.0% 30.8% 23.7% 21.5% 34.2% 40.1% 14.1% 40.5%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Target Audience:









Mean - - - - - - - -

Conservation 13.6% 30.8% 7.3% 12.9% 12.3% 9.2% 9.0% 8.3%

144

group volunteer Not sure/Don't know



35.6% 41.1% 30.1% 39.3% 28.8% 53.6% 44.9% 35.7%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Celebrity/Soap Star/Entertainer Not sure/Don't know

28.8% 38.3% 13.6% 18.4% 12.3% 19.6% 10.3% 10.7%



55.9% 43.0% 65.5% 36.2% 56.2% 70.6% 60.3% 51.2%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

NGO workers Not sure/Don't know

11.9% 27.1% 9.2% 10.4% 11.1% 9.8% 6.4% 6.0%

145



32.2% 49.5% 37.9% 38.0% 34.7% 53.6% 30.8% 33.7%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Target audience's most trusted person if they told something about the environment

(11) Is there any other person you would trust if they told you something about the environment? Who would that be?

Target Audience:

Overall









Percents

0 100

person on radio 286 30.9%

43 20.8%

66 40.5%

65 42.5%

51 47.7%

17 20.2%

6 7.7%

19 26.0%

17 28.8%

person on television 262 28.3%

74 35.7%

47 28.8%

39 25.5%

27 25.2%

21 25.0%

28 35.9%

11 15.1%

13 22.0%

Newswriter (newspaper or magazine)

103 11.1%

6 2.9%

42 25.8%

11 7.2%

26 24.3%

9 10.7%

2 2.6%

3 4.1%

3 5.1%

law enforcement officer 103 24 21 16 11 16 1 9 5

146

11.1% 11.6% 12.9% 10.5% 10.3% 19.0% 1.3% 12.3% 8.5%

national government official 96 10.4%

7 3.4%

27 16.6%

7 4.6%

9 8.4%

24 28.6%

17 21.8%

1 1.4%

4 6.8%

local government official 134 14.5%

18 8.7%

18 11.0%

52 34.0%

10 9.3%

19 22.6%

5 6.4%

4 5.5%

8 13.6%

local community leaders 118 12.7%

18 8.7%

26 16.0%

23 15.0%

7 6.5%

25 29.8%

11 14.1%

2 2.7%

6 10.2%

religious leaders 85 9.2%

29 14.0%

17 10.4%

0 0.0%

16 15.0%

13 15.5%

3 3.8%

6 8.2%

1 1.7%

friends or family members 96 10.4%

10 4.8%

34 20.9%

1 0.7%

28 26.2%

12 14.3%

0 0.0%

9 12.3%

2 3.4%

teachers 67 7.2%

19 9.2%

23 14.1%

0 0.0%

12 11.2%

6 7.1%

1 1.3%

3 4.1%

3 5.1%

Scientist 36 3.9%

9 4.3%

5 3.1%

3 2.0%

7 6.5%

7 8.3%

1 1.3%

4 5.5%

0 0.0%

Person on poster or billboard 14 1.5%

2 1.0%

5 3.1%

0 0.0%

5 4.7%

1 1.2%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

0 0.0%

Information from printed booklets

11 1.2%

1 0.5%

3 1.8%

0 0.0%

4 3.7%

3 3.6%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

(11) Is there any other person you would trust if they told you something about the environment? Who would that be?

Target Audience:

Overall



TA 4A (Manga resident fishers

TA 1B (Ubujan resident fishers

TA 5 (City officials and employees) pre-

TA 4B ( Booy resident fishers) pre-


TA 1A (Taloto resident fishers) pre-

Percents

0 100

147

) pre-selected

) pre-selected

selected selected

selected

Information from puppet shows

10 1.1%

1 0.5%

3 1.8%

0 0.0%

5 4.7%

1 1.2%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

Information from public meetings

74 8.0%

32 15.5%

9 5.5%

11 7.2%

6 5.6%

3 3.6%

1 1.3%

7 9.6%

5 8.5%

Conservation group volunteer 30 3.2%

7 3.4%

6 3.7%

0 0.0%

6 5.6%

2 2.4%

1 1.3%

3 4.1%

5 8.5%

Celebrity/ soap star/ entertainer

11 1.2%

1 0.5%

2 1.2%

0 0.0%

6 5.6%

2 2.4%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

NGO workers 43 4.6%

11 5.3%

4 2.5%

2 1.3%

7 6.5%

5 6.0%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

13 22.0%

Others 3 0.3%

1 0.5%

0 0.0%

1 0.7%

1 0.9%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

Other 4 0.4%

0 0.0%

1 0.6%

3 2.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

Not Applicable 100 10.8%

8 3.9%

30 18.4%

26 17.0%

9 8.4%

9 10.7%

2 2.6%

16 21.9%

0 0.0%

Totals 927 n/a

207 n/a

163 n/a

153 n/a

107 n/a

84 n/a

78 n/a

73 n/a

59 n/a

Radio ranked as the highest (30.9%) among trusted sources of information listed herein. Person on TV ranked second (28.3%) and local government official ranked third (14.5%).

148

National Ambassador

(12) Among the person I will mention here, who would you trust most if they told you something the environment?

Target Audience:

Overall (934)


Taloto and Ubujan fishers (17.8%, 166)


TA 4A (Manga resident fishers) pre-selected (16.8%, 156)


TA 4B ( Booy resident fishers) pre-selected (8.4%, 78)


Percents0 100

Kuya Kim 556 60.0%

127 61.4%

66 39.8%

121 74.2%

85 55.6%

56 66.7%

56 71.8%

42 57.5%

Cesar Montano 153 16.5%

39 18.8%

41 24.7%

11 6.7%

17 11.1%

6 7.1%

19 24.4%

20 27.4%

Richard Guttierez 18 1.9%

5 2.4%

9 5.4%

2 1.2%

1 0.7%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

KC Concepcion 26 2.8%

4 1.9%

10 6.0%

5 3.1%

0 0.0%

5 6.0%

1 1.3%

1 1.4%

Venuz Raj 14 1.5%

4 1.9%

4 2.4%

3 1.8%

1 0.7%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

2 2.7%

149

None of the above 131 14.1%

25 12.1%

29 17.5%

21 12.9%

32 20.9%

16 19.0%

2 2.6%

6 8.2%

Others 29 3.1%

3 1.4%

7 4.2%

0 0.0%

17 11.1%

1 1.2%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

Other 1 0.1%

0 0.0%

1 0.6%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

Totals 927 n/a

207 n/a

166 n/a

163 n/a

153 n/a

84 n/a

78 n/a

73 n/a

Among the options personalities, majority of the respondents chose _________________ aka Kuya Kim as the National Ambassador for Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Pride Campaign with the total percentage of 60%. This is followed by Cesar Montano (16.4%). Kuya Kim is a TV host of the ABS-CBN’s Matanglawin, a documentary program that features environment, science, history and the like.

Local Ambassador by TA

(13) Among the person I will mention here, who would you trust most if they told you something about the environment?

Target Audience:

Overall (934)




TA 1B (Ubujan resident fishers) pre-selected (11.5%, 107)




TA 1A (Taloto resident fishers) pre-selected (6.3%, 59)

Percents

0 100

150

Rich Asuncion 84 9.1%

27 13.0%

28 17.2%

0 0.0%

5 4.7%

3 3.6%

1 1.3%

11 15.1%

8 13.8%

Atty. Jess Tirol 266 28.8%

45 21.7%

33 20.2%

76 49.7%

18 16.8%

16 19.3%

42 53.8%

17 23.3%

18 31.0%

Bishop Medroso 192 20.8%

64 30.9%

19 11.7%

4 2.6%

34 31.8%

14 16.9%

24 30.8%

17 23.3%

15 25.9%

Mary Leine Shane Karaan 57 6.2%

6 2.9%

20 12.3%

0 0.0%

8 7.5%

10 12.0%

4 5.1%

8 11.0%

1 1.7%

Loreto Palapos 27 2.9%

12 5.8%

1 0.6%

3 2.0%

0 0.0%

4 4.8%

1 1.3%

4 5.5%

2 3.4%

None of the above 235 25.4%

45 21.7%

57 35.0%

47 30.7%

30 28.0%

27 32.5%

5 6.4%

12 16.4%

12 20.7%

Atty. Barbarona 5 0.5%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

2 1.3%

0 0.0%

2 2.4%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

0 0.0%

Faro M. Cabalit 2 0.2%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

2 2.7%

0 0.0%

Others___________________

25 2.7%

0 0.0%

5 3.1%

3 2.0%

12 11.2%

2 2.4%

1 1.3%

0 0.0%

2 3.4%

Other 32 3.5%

8 3.9%

0 0.0%

18 11.8%

0 0.0%

5 6.0%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

0 0.0%

Totals925 100.0%

207 100.0%

163 100.0%

153 100.0%

107 100.0%

83 100.0%

78 100.0%

73 100.0%

58 100.0%

151

Majority of the respondents chose Atty. Jess Tirol (28.7%) as the Local Ambassador for the Mabaw Pride Campaign Program. Followed by Bishop Medroso (20.8%) and Rich Asuncion (9.1%). However, a significant number who preferred not to choose any of the options is also high which reach a total percentage of 25.4%.

Most of the respondents listen to radio up to 3 days per week (28.8%). Some of them listen 7 days a week (26.3%), 4 to 6 days per week (18.4%) and others never (18.3%) listen to radio. The majority of the resident and non-resident fishers listen to radio 7 days per week (31.6%). Some of them listen to radio up to 3 days per week, while other never listen to radio (20.2%). Majority of the respondents listen DYTR AM (58.1%), followed by DYRD AM with 35%, DYTR FM with 29.9% and DYRD FM with 23.3%.

Frequency of resident and non-resident fishers in listening radio

(14) In the past month, how frequent you listened radio?

Target Audience:

OverallResidents and non-residents





Percents0 100

Never 161 18.2%

74 20.2%

34 16.8%

20 12.8%

26 31.3%

6 8.3%

Up to 3 days per week 265 30.0%

93 25.3%

80 39.6%

32 20.5%

28 33.7%

30 41.7%

4 to 6 days per week 159 18.0%

73 19.9%

48 23.8%

16 10.3%

11 13.3%

11 15.3%

7 days per week 227 25.7%

116 31.6%

33 16.3%

54 34.6%

12 14.5%

12 16.7%

N/A 71 8.0%

11 3.0%

7 3.5%

34 21.8%

6 7.2%

13 18.1%

Totals 883 367 202 156 83 72

152

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Preferred radio station per target audience

Target Audience:









(A) When you listen to the radio, which radio stations are your preferred stations? Please choose only two stations. DYTR FM

29.6%; 61 40.5%; 66 26.0%; 40 21.5%; 23 30.1%; 25 38.5%; 30 30.1%; 22 13.8%; 8

DYTR AM 43.7%; 90 61.3%; 100 78.6%; 121 57.0%; 61 49.4%; 41 78.2%; 61 54.8%; 40 39.7%; 23

DYRD FM 23.8%; 49 16.6%; 27 13.6%; 21 21.5%; 23 39.8%; 33 34.6%; 27 37.0%; 27 15.5%; 9

DYRD AM 30.6%; 63 18.4%; 30 40.3%; 62 37.4%; 40 44.6%; 37 55.1%; 43 47.9%; 35 24.1%; 14

153

No favorite station 22.3%; 46 1.8%; 3 1.9%; 3 5.6%; 6 7.2%; 6 0.0%; 0 9.6%; 7 19.0%; 11

Don't know 4.9%; 10 6.1%; 10 13.0%; 20 3.7%; 4 18.1%; 15 5.1%; 4 2.7%; 2 8.6%; 5

I don't listen to radio 6.3%; 13 1.8%; 3 1.3%; 2 0.0%; 0 4.8%; 4 10.3%; 8 2.7%; 2 5.2%; 3

Others_ _________ 0.5%; 1 2.5%; 4 0.0%; 0 2.8%; 3 1.2%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.7%; 1

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Preferred hours during weekdays for the resident and non-resident fishers to listen to radio

(C) Weekday time

Target Audience:

Overall (934)






Percents0 100

Before 6:00 a.m. 165 17.8%

89 22.3%

24 11.5%

22 13.5%

14 17.1%

14 19.2%

6:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. 347 37.4%

164 41.0%

73 35.1%

65 39.9%

24 29.3%

20 27.4%

10:01 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. 140 15.1%

77 19.3%

16 7.7%

32 19.6%

9 11.0%

6 8.2%

2:01 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. 88 9.5%

52 13.0%

9 4.3%

18 11.0%

4 4.9%

5 6.8%

6:01 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. 60 36 7 11 3 2

154

6.5% 9.0% 3.4% 6.7% 3.7% 2.7%

After 10:00 p.m. 15 1.6%

6 1.5%

1 0.5%

1 0.6%

4 4.9%

3 4.1%

No particular time 268 28.8%

73 18.3%

102 49.0%

34 20.9%

27 32.9%

32 43.8%

Off and on all day 60 6.5%

20 5.0%

3 1.4%

26 16.0%

1 1.2%

9 12.3%

Don't know 51 5.5%

21 5.3%

3 1.4%

8 4.9%

14 17.1%

5 6.8%

Don't watch/listen 79 8.5%

35 8.8%

26 12.5%

9 5.5%

6 7.3%

3 4.1%

Totals 929 n/a

400 n/a

208 n/a

163 n/a

82 n/a

73 n/a

News (66.9%) is the favorite type of radio program that most respondents listened to. This is followed by local music (34.4%), foreign music (18.2%), drama (12.3%) and sports (10.6%). Specifically for the resident and non-resident fishers, majority of them like to listen news radio program (71.6%), local music (34.2%) and drama (15.3%). Resident and non-residents fishers preferred listening to radio during week days between 6:00-10:00 in the morning (41%), before 6:00 am (22.3%) and between 10:00-2:00 in the afternoon. Others fishers have no particular time when listening to radio. During weekend, most fishers preferred to listen to radio between 6:00-10:00 in the morning.

Frequency of fishers to read newspaper in a week

(15) newspaper Target Audience:

Overall (934)

Resident and non-

TA 2A ( Taloto local

TA 2B (Ubujan local


TA 3 (Management

Percents

155

resident fishers (43.0%, 400)

community) random (22.4%, 208)

community) random (17.5%, 163)

employees) pre-selected (9.1%, 85)

committee) pre-selected (8.0%, 74)

0 100

Never 531 58.3%

302 77.2%

123 60.0%

64 40.5%

19 23.2%

20 27.8%

Up to 3 days per week 258 28.3%

66 16.9%

64 31.2%

49 31.0%

43 52.4%

36 50.0%

4 to 6 days per week 45 4.9%

14 3.6%

4 2.0%

16 10.1%

5 6.1%

6 8.3%

7 days per week 32 3.5%

4 1.0%

9 4.4%

13 8.2%

3 3.7%

3 4.2%

N/A 45 4.9%

5 1.3%

5 2.4%

16 10.1%

12 14.6%

7 9.7%

Totals 911 100.0%

391 100.0%

205 100.0%

158 100.0%

82 100.0%

72 100.0%

Surprisingly, majority of the respondents never read newspaper in a week (58%). In fact, 77.2% of the resident and non-resident fishers never read newspaper, 60% of the Taloto local community, 40.5% of the Ubujan Local Community and 27.8% of the management committee. This result is also evident on the result of the preferred newspaper where Don’t Read ranked as the highest. Nevertheless, Bohol Chronicle (23.5%) has the highest readers compared to Bohol Sunday Post (12.9%), The Bohol Times (7%) and other newspapers.

Preferred newspaper by Target Audience

156

(A) Newpaper/magazine

Target Audience:

Overall (934)









Percents

0 100

Daily Enquirer 93 10.0%

26 12.6%

21 13.0%

10 6.4%

2 1.9%

22 26.5%

3 3.8%

8 11.3%

1 1.7%

Bohol Chronicle 218 23.5%

34 16.4%

44 27.2%

43 27.6%

9 8.4%

41 49.4%

8 10.3%

38 53.5%

1 1.7%

Bohol Sunday Post 120 13.0%

12 5.8%

49 30.2%

16 10.3%

8 7.5%

21 25.3%

3 3.8%

11 15.5%

0 0.0%

The Bohol Times 65 7.0%

14 6.8%

25 15.4%

5 3.2%

4 3.7%

13 15.7%

2 2.6%

1 1.4%

1 1.7%

The Bohol Standard 22 2.4%

3 1.4%

3 1.9%

1 0.6%

0 0.0%

11 13.3%

3 3.8%

1 1.4%

0 0.0%

No favorite 70 7.6%

31 15.0%

11 6.8%

11 7.1%

3 2.8%

4 4.8%

0 0.0%

9 12.7%

1 1.7%

Don't know 131 14.1%

8 3.9%

28 17.3%

27 17.3%

32 29.9%

16 19.3%

5 6.4%

10 14.1%

4 6.8%

Don't read 386 41.7%

112 54.1%

26 16.0%

62 39.7%

54 50.5%

9 10.8%

61 78.2%

9 12.7%

51 86.4%

157

BBDN 25 2.7%

2 1.0%

16 9.9%

0 0.0%

5 4.7%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

2 2.8%

0 0.0%

Other 15 1.6%

2 1.0%

4 2.5%

3 1.9%

1 0.9%

2 2.4%

1 1.3%

1 1.4%

1 1.7%

Totals 926 n/a

207 n/a

162 n/a

156 n/a

107 n/a

83 n/a

78 n/a

71 n/a

59 n/a

Most of the target audiences like a lot in terms of Original Pilipino Music, Traditional Music, local news, national news, sports, religious program, drama and comedy. Some of them said they like a little to talk show programs and some did not like you-tube. Among the program, local news (59.7%) and national news (58.5%) got the highest percentage from among the TAs.

Q16. Preferred types of media program per Target audience

Target Audience:









9.1%, 85

(A) Original Pilipino Music (OPM) Like a most/lot

74.1%; 43 72.9%; 78 80.3%; 163 84.7%; 138 81.2%; 56 87.7%; 136 73.1%; 57 69.2%; 54

Like a little/not like 25.9%; 15 27.1%; 29 19.7%; 40 15.3%; 25 18.8%; 13 12.3%; 19 26.9%; 21 30.8%; 24

Totals 100.0%; 58 100.0%; 107 100.0%; 203 100.0%; 163 100.0%; 69 100.0%; 155 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 78

(B) Traditional 60.3% 66.4% 45.3% 74.8% 65.2% 61.9% 69.2% 59.5%

158

Music Like a most/lot

Like a little/not like 39.7% 33.6% 54.7% 25.2% 34.8% 38.1% 30.8% 40.5%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(C) Local news Like a most/lot 60.3% 76.6% 81.6% 84.7% 80.3% 83.9% 84.6% 71.8%


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(D) National news Like a most/lot 43.1% 81.3% 77.7% 85.3% 83.3% 68.4% 82.1% 74.7%


Target Audience:









9.1%, 85

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(E) Sports Like a most/lot 71.2% 79.4% 64.1% 72.4% 74.3% 85.8% 70.5% 57.7%

159


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(F) Religious programs Like a most/lot

43.1% 65.4% 52.5% 77.3% 68.6% 54.8% 64.1% 63.3%


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(G) Talk show programs Like a most/lot

17.2% 35.5% 35.1% 67.5% 43.5% 39.4% 30.8% 46.8%


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(H) Dramas Like a most/lot 49.2% 32.7% 47.5% 68.7% 36.2% 45.2% 48.7% 43.6%

Target Audience:









9.1%, 85

160


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(I) Comedy Like a most/lot 70.7% 41.1% 66.8% 79.1% 47.1% 68.4% 70.5% 57.7%


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(J) You-tube Like a most/lot 1.7% 14.0% 18.2% 44.2% 40.6% 15.5% 16.7% 40.3%


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Section 4: Stages of Behavior Change

Fishing/ Gleaning

(17) Do you glean or fish or both? (choose on only)

yes I glean6.1%; 55

yes I fish 28.9%; 261

161

yes I glean and fish 8.5%; 77

no I don't glean and don't fish 47.0%; 424

Not Applicable 9.4%; 85

Totals 100.0%; 902The 28% of the respondents are fishers. Others do fishing and gleaning (8.5%) and some do only gleaning (6.1%). Relatively, there were 26.9% of the fishers said they have not fished/gleaned in Mabaw MS. While 7.3% said I have never considered stopping fishing in Mabaw MS and 3.8% of the respondents they have considered stopping fishing in Mabaw MS.

Combined Taloto and Ubujan Fishers on Q7:Target Audience:


Taloto and Ubujan fishers combined






(18) (If respondent said no I don't fish and I don't glean in previous question then don't ask question and select "behavior is not relevant to this respondent") I am going to read you a list of 6 statemen I have never considered stopping fishing/gleaning in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

0.5%; 1 18.4%; 27 13.2%; 20 3.3%; 5 6.1%; 2 0.0%; 0 8.7%; 4

I have considered stopping fishing/gleaning in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary but do not want to stop doing so

2.1%; 4 10.2%; 15 2.6%; 4 3.9%; 6 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

I intend to stop fishing/gleaning in the 0.5%; 1 7.5%; 11 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 2 3.0%; 1 0.0%; 0 2.2%; 1

162

Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in the next 6 months but have not done so yet

I have talked to someone about stopping fishing/gleaning in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months, but have not stopped yet.

1.0%; 2 3.4%; 5 2.6%; 4 2.0%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.2%; 1

I have only gone fishing/gleaning in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary a few times in the past 6 months

1.6%; 3 4.8%; 7 0.7%; 1 3.3%; 5 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 0.0%; 0

I have not fished/gleaned in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 months 5.7%; 11 53.7%; 79 4.6%; 7 54.6%; 83 6.1%; 2 28.2%; 22 26.1%; 12

Behavior is not relevant for this respondent 88.6%; 171 6.1%; 9 82.2%; 125 32.9%; 50 84.8%; 28 70.5%; 55 65.2%; 30

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Fishers combined on Q7:Target Audience:







fishers combine

(19) In the last 6 months, have you heard of anyone reporting someone breaking the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary rules and

6.8%; 14 20.1%; 28 22.2%; 16 12.2%; 19 19.2%; 15 25.9%; 21 12.4%; 19

163

regulations to the enforcement team? Yes

No 89.3%; 184 74.1%; 103 65.3%; 47 73.7%; 115 80.8%; 63 63.0%; 51 84.3%; 129

Unsure 0.0%; 0 2.9%; 4 2.8%; 2 1.3%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.6%; 4

N/A 3.9%; 8 2.9%; 4 9.7%; 7 12.8%; 20 0.0%; 0 11.1%; 9 0.7%; 1

Totals 100.0%; 206 100.0%; 139 100.0%; 72 100.0%; 156 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 81 100.0%; 153

Q20. Percentage of respondents who have heard anyone taking part of any Mabaw MS activities

Target Audience:









In the last 6 months, have you heard of anyone taking part of any Mabaw Marine Sanctuary related activities? Yes

15.3%; 9 37.2%; 35 13.9%; 29 17.3%; 24 56.9%; 41 21.2%; 33 30.8%; 24 38.3%; 31

No 44.1%; 26 38.3%; 36 47.1%; 98 32.4%; 45 20.8%; 15 33.3%; 52 65.4%; 51 21.0%; 17

164

Don't know 35.6%; 21 20.2%; 19 31.7%; 66 28.1%; 39 13.9%; 10 42.9%; 67 2.6%; 2 22.2%; 18

Not Applicable 5.1%; 3 4.3%; 4 7.2%; 15 22.3%; 31 8.3%; 6 2.6%; 4 1.3%; 1 18.5%; 15

Totals 100.0%; 59 100.0%; 94 100.0%; 208 100.0%; 139 100.0%; 72 100.0%; 156 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 81

There were 78.4% respondents who said they have not heard of anyone reporting MPA violations . Some of them they have heard (14.7%) and the others are unsure (1.4%). Specifically for fishers, 79.3% said they have not heard and on 13.7% said they have heard of anyone reporting MPA violations. Across all audiences, 38.5% said they have not heard of anyone taking part of any Mabaw MS related activities, 27.3% said don’t know and 25.3% said they have heard.

Section 5: Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Knowledge in SMART Objectives

Q21. Level of knowledge of each TA on Mabaw MS regulations

resident fishers combined on Q7:Target Audience:







Resident fishers combined 17.8%, 166

(A) To catch, gather, collect, disturb or kill fish and other marine

80.7%; 167 69.1%; 94 73.6%; 53 90.4%; 141 82.1%; 64 74.4%; 61 72.5%; 111

165

aquatic inside Mabaw MS is prohib True

False 3.9%; 8 4.4%; 6 5.6%; 4 4.5%; 7 7.7%; 6 4.9%; 4 16.3%; 25

Unsure 15.5%; 32 26.5%; 36 20.8%; 15 5.1%; 8 10.3%; 8 20.7%; 17 11.1%; 17

Totals 100.0%; 207 100.0%; 136 100.0%; 72 100.0%; 156 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 82 100.0%; 153

(B) Only Hook and Line fishing is allowed inside the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary True

12.1% 58.8% 37.5% 21.8% 37.2% 37.8% 47.1%

False 55.3% 11.8% 20.8% 63.5% 50.0% 32.9% 33.3%

Unsure 32.5% 29.4% 41.7% 14.7% 12.8% 29.3% 19.6%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - -

(C) Is it allowed to conduct research permitted by the city government inside Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. True

52.9% 64.7% 59.7% 64.7% 82.1% 67.1% 58.8%

False 3.9% 5.1% 4.2% 10.3% 5.1% 4.9% 14.4%

Unsure 43.2% 30.1% 36.1% 25.0% 12.8% 28.0% 26.8%

166

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

resident fishers combined on Q7:Target Audience:







Resident fishers combined 17.8%, 166

Mean - - - - - - -

(D) Passage of boats in emergency situation and for law enforcement activities inside the Mabaw Marine True

48.5% 59.6% 45.8% 51.9% 71.8% 54.9% 59.5%

False 7.3% 8.1% 5.6% 21.8% 14.1% 7.3% 20.3%

Unsure 44.2% 32.4% 48.6% 26.3% 14.1% 37.8% 20.3%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - -

(E) After five years of no fishing being allowed, the MMS can be harvested again True

24.3% 52.2% 27.8% 12.2% 29.5% 36.6% 32.0%

False 23.3% 14.0% 20.8% 59.0% 50.0% 24.4% 37.9%

167

Unsure 52.4% 33.8% 51.4% 28.8% 20.5% 39.0% 30.1%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - -

(F) No person shall be allowed to establish fish traps and fish aggregating devices within the core zo True

56.0% 64.0% 52.8% 76.9% 71.8% 67.1% 56.2%

False 4.8% 5.9% 5.6% 13.5% 15.4% 6.1% 27.5%

Unsure 39.1% 30.1% 41.7% 9.6% 12.8% 26.8% 16.3%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - -

(G) No one can catch fish or collect shells in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary True

61.4% 64.0% 50.0% 82.1% 78.2% 70.7% 55.6%

False 3.9% 6.6% 2.9% 9.0% 9.0% 4.9% 29.4%

Unsure 34.8% 29.4% 47.1% 9.0% 12.8% 24.4% 15.0%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - -

168

Q21. Percentage of fishers

Resident fishers combined on Q7:Target Audience:


Resident fishers 17.8%, 166






(G) No one can catch fish or collect shells in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary True

61.4%; 127 55.6%; 85 64.0%; 87 82.1%; 128 70.7%; 58 78.2%; 61 50.0%; 34

False 3.9%; 8 29.4%; 45 6.6%; 9 9.0%; 14 4.9%; 4 9.0%; 7 2.9%; 2

Unsure 34.8%; 72 15.0%; 23 29.4%; 40 9.0%; 14 24.4%; 20 12.8%; 10 47.1%; 32

Totals 100.0%; 207 100.0%; 153 100.0%; 136 100.0%; 156 100.0%; 82 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 68

Q22A. Percentage of target audiences who said that there are benefit of having a nearby MPA

Target Audience:

169









(A) Are there any benefits to the local community from having a no-take area nearby? (If respondent answers YES then please also ask next question) COHORT QUESTION) Yes

64.4%; 38 51.1%; 48 63.8%; 132 18.4%; 25 69.4%; 50 41.7%; 65 44.9%; 35 57.3%; 47

No 8.5%; 5 22.3%; 21 6.3%; 13 11.8%; 16 5.6%; 4 35.3%; 55 32.1%; 25 7.3%; 6

Don't know 27.1%; 16 26.6%; 25 30.0%; 62 69.9%; 95 25.0%; 18 23.1%; 36 23.1%; 18 35.4%; 29

Totals 100.0%; 59 100.0%; 94 100.0%; 207 100.0%; 136 100.0%; 72 100.0%; 156 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 82

Mean 2.37 2.24 2.34 1.49 2.44 2.19 2.22 2.22

Many of the respondents said that there are benefits to the local community from having a nearby no-take area (49.7%), other do not know of the benefits and 16.5% of the respondents said there are no benefits. For those who said yes, the following are the perceived benefits: area for fish to reproduce (34.6%), more fish (32,2%), bigger or better coral/ habitat for fish (19.1%), bigger fish (16%) and more fertile fish (12.5%).

170

Q22B. Percentage of target audiences who say the benefits MPAs to the local community

Target Audience:









(B) (Ask only of those who said yes to previous question) What local community benefits are there from having the no-take area nearby? You can tell me up to 3 that you know. (Do NOT read out answers but t more fish

51.7%; 30 18.3%; 17 39.3%; 81 10.4%; 14 43.1%; 31 37.8%; 59 33.3%; 26 31.7%; 26

area for fish to reproduce 29.3%; 17 22.6%; 21 31.6%; 65 28.9%; 39 25.0%; 18 71.2%; 111

19.2%; 15 22.0%; 18

bigger fish 17.2%; 10 9.7%; 9 22.8%; 47 3.7%; 5 16.7%; 12 9.6%; 15 28.2%; 22 23.2%; 19

bigger or better coral / habitat for fish 22.4%; 13 17.2%; 16 10.7%; 22 20.7%; 28 8.3%; 6 41.0%; 64 11.5%; 9 11.0%; 9

more fertile fish 5.2%; 3 0.0%; 0 12.1%; 25 0.0%; 0 5.6%; 4 38.5%; 60 12.8%; 10 9.8%; 8

bank of the sea / food security 20.7%; 12 2.2%; 2 14.1%; 29 3.7%; 5 16.7%; 12 4.5%; 7 1.3%; 1 2.4%; 2

better regulation/management of 1.7%; 1 7.5%; 7 1.0%; 2 4.4%; 6 1.4%; 1 3.8%; 6 3.8%; 3 3.7%; 3

171

fishing activities

no more destructive fishing in that area 5.2%; 3 5.4%; 5 4.4%; 9 3.7%; 5 5.6%; 4 10.9%; 17 2.6%; 2 1.2%; 1

community ownership 1.7%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.7%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 2.4%; 2

better/new access to tourism 3.4%; 2 4.3%; 4 7.8%; 16 14.8%; 20 4.2%; 3 0.6%; 1 6.4%; 5 11.0%; 9

better community cohesion 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.5%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 3.7%; 3

dont know 1.7%; 1 1.1%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

wala kahibaw 0.0%; 0 2.2%; 2 0.5%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Other 3.4%; 2 3.2%; 3 1.0%; 2 2.2%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.2%; 1

Not Applicable 24.1%; 14 53.8%; 50 28.2%; 58 54.1%; 73 25.0%; 18 20.5%; 32 53.8%; 42 41.5%; 34

Q23. Involvement of LGU in determining the size/location of the Mabaw MS

Target Audience:









9.1%, 85

(B) Local Government officials

15.3%; 9 43.0%; 40 7.2%; 15 28.4%; 38 16.7%; 12 32.9%; 51 20.5%; 16 37.8%; 31

172

Regularly

Occasionally 49.2%; 29 18.3%; 17 47.3%; 98 42.5%; 57 56.9%; 41 54.8%; 85 52.6%; 41 24.4%; 20

Never 15.3%; 9 4.3%; 4 1.0%; 2 6.0%; 8 2.8%; 2 3.9%; 6 9.0%; 7 4.9%; 4

Not sure/ Don't know 20.3%; 12 34.4%; 32 44.4%; 92 23.1%; 31 23.6%; 17 8.4%; 13 17.9%; 14 32.9%; 27

Totals 100.0%; 59 100.0%; 93 100.0%; 207 100.0%; 134 100.0%; 72 100.0%; 155 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 82

Forty-three percent (43%) of fishers in Ubujan believed that the local government unit were regularly involved in the determining the size of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. However, other respondents such as fishers in Taloto, local community and the management council believe the LGU was involved occasionally in such undertaking.

Section 6: Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Attitude in SMART Objectives

Q25. Percentage of target audiences who agree on the impacts of not enforcing the MPA regulations

Combined Ubujan and Taloto residents on Q7:Target Audience:

Combined Ubujan and Taloto residents 39.9%, 371







(A) Fish species will continue to decline in number or disappear Strongly Agree

27.0%; 91 33.9%; 20 47.8%; 44 30.9%; 21 48.4%; 75 50.0%; 39 59.0%; 46

173

Agree 64.4%; 217 50.8%; 30 37.0%; 34 52.9%; 36 46.5%; 72 39.7%; 31 34.6%; 27

Disagree 4.5%; 15 13.6%; 8 13.0%; 12 8.8%; 6 4.5%; 7 7.7%; 6 2.6%; 2

Strongly Disagree 4.2%; 14 1.7%; 1 2.2%; 2 7.4%; 5 0.6%; 1 2.6%; 2 3.8%; 3

Totals 100.0%; 337 100.0%; 59 100.0%; 92 100.0%; 68 100.0%; 155 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 78

Mean 3.14 3.17 3.30 3.07 3.43 3.37 3.49

(B) The corals begin to die when the fish are taken away Strongly Agree

21.7% 32.2% 45.7% 27.9% 31.6% 19.2% 48.7%

Agree 60.8% 45.8% 37.0% 51.5% 42.6% 56.4% 38.5%

Disagree 13.1% 20.3% 15.2% 13.2% 25.2% 23.1% 9.0%

Strongly Disagree 4.5% 1.7% 2.2% 7.4% 0.6% 1.3% 3.8%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean 3.00 3.08 3.26 3.00 3.05 2.94 3.32

(C) The local community will be poorer and less united

Strongly Agree

20.2% 16.9% 41.3% 22.1% 24.5% 17.9% 48.7%

Agree 65.3% 55.9% 33.7% 55.9% 54.2% 75.6% 41.0%

Disagree 9.8% 23.7% 19.6% 16.2% 21.3% 6.4% 7.7%

Strongly Disagree 4.7% 3.4% 5.4% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean 3.01 2.86 3.11 2.94 3.03 3.12 3.36

174

Level of support of fishers in increasing the enforcement of Mabaw MS

(26) What is your level of support for increasing the enforcement of the regulations of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary?

Target Audience:

Overall (934)


Taloto and Ubujan resident fisher's (17.8%, 166)






Percent0 100

Strongly do not support the increase in enforcement

18 2.0%

1 0.5%

1 0.7%

1 0.8%

2 1.3%

7 8.5%

5 6.4%

1 1.4%

Do not support the increase in enforcement

8 0.9%

0 0.0%

3 2.0%

2 1.5%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

3 3.8%

0 0.0%

175

Support the increase in enforcement

493 56.0%

101 49.0%

78 51.7%

85 63.9%

103 66.5%

41 50.0%

40 51.3%

44 61.1%

Strongly support the increase in enforcement

244 27.7%

73 35.4%

29 19.2%

19 14.3%

48 31.0%

26 31.7%

30 38.5%

17 23.6%

Unsure 117 13.3%

31 15.0%

40 26.5%

26 19.5%

2 1.3%

8 9.8%

0 0.0%

10 13.9%

Totals880 100.0%

206 100.0%

151 100.0%

133 100.0%

155 100.0%

82 100.0%

78 100.0%

72 100.0%

Majority of the target audiences support the increase in enforcement of regulations of Mabaw Marine Sanctuary (56%). The Management Committee has the highest percentage (61%) compared to the other respondents. Based on the city ordinance, management committee is responsible on the day-to-day operations of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. However, only 23% of the management committee strongly support the increase in enforcement of Mabaw MS.

Preference of the TA to govern the MPA

Target Audience:

TA 1A (Taloto resident fishers)

TA 1B (Ubujan resident fishers) pre-




TA 4A (Manga resident fishers) pre-



176

pre-selected selected selected selected

(28) Who would you trust most to head and govern the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee? (Choose one only) Community member

20.3%; 12 16.3%; 15 24.8%; 51 24.1%; 32 15.3%; 11 0.6%; 1 1.3%; 1 17.3%; 14

Fishers/Gleaners 15.3%; 9 29.3%; 27 16.0%; 33 8.3%; 11 2.8%; 2 3.9%; 6 19.2%; 15 7.4%; 6

National Police 3.4%; 2 1.1%; 1 2.4%; 5 0.0%; 0 4.2%; 3 0.6%; 1 2.6%; 2 4.9%; 4

Non-government officials

13.6%; 8 2.2%; 2 2.9%; 6 1.5%; 2 2.8%; 2 4.5%; 7 5.1%; 4 8.6%; 7

Barangay officials

37.3%; 22 37.0%; 34 35.9%; 74 36.8%; 49 41.7%; 30 54.8%; 85 46.2%; 36 16.0%; 13

City government officials

6.8%; 4 4.3%; 4 7.8%; 16 18.0%; 24 25.0%; 18 27.7%; 43 7.7%; 6 40.7%; 33

National 3.4%; 2 3.3%; 3 1.0%; 2 2.3%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 15.4%; 12 4.9%; 4

177

government officials

Private sector 1.7%; 1 4.3%; 4 4.4%; 9 3.0%; 4 2.8%; 2 0.6%; 1 2.6%; 2 2.5%; 2

mayor Dan Lim 0.0%; 0 2.2%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Other 0.0%; 0 1.1%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.8%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.2%; 1

Other 3.4%; 2 3.3%; 3 9.2%; 19 9.0%; 12 8.3%; 6 7.7%; 12 1.3%; 1 7.4%; 6

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Percentage of fishers who say about their catch as a result of the MPA

Catch increase/decrease as a result of the MPA on Q7:Target Audience:






TAs not relevant to the question 49.0%, 456

(29) Has your catch increased, decreased or stayed the same as a result of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary? (If the person does not fish or glean mark as NA) Decreased

15.3%; 9 27.5%; 25 1.4%; 1 20.0%; 31 19.2%; 15 0.2%; 1

Increased 32.2%; 19 6.6%; 6 0.0%; 0 9.7%; 15 1.3%; 1 7.6%; 32

Stayed the Same 30.5%; 18 44.0%; 40 11.1%; 8 48.4%; 75 46.2%; 36 5.7%; 24

178

Not Applicable 22.0%; 13 22.0%; 20 87.5%; 63 21.9%; 34 33.3%; 26 86.4%; 362

Totals 100.0%; 59 100.0%; 91 100.0%; 72 100.0%; 155 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 419

Taloto fishers said that their catch had increased as a result to Mabaw Marine Sanctuary (32%), and the majority of the fishers coming from Ubujan (44%), Manga (48%) and Booys (46%) said their catch stayed the same (30%). Noticeably, other fishers coming from Ubujan (27%) and fishers from other barangay also said that their catch decreased as a result of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary.

Q30. Percentage of TAs who find it easy to do the activities related to Mabaw MS

Target Audience:









(A) Attend at least 6 meetings of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee in 12 months Easy

30.5%; 18 66.3%; 61 39.3%; 81 50.4%; 67 48.6%; 35 45.8%; 71 50.0%; 39 19.5%; 16

179

Difficult 18.6%; 11 3.3%; 3 25.2%; 52 1.5%; 2 12.5%; 9 18.1%; 28 21.8%; 17 14.6%; 12

Not sure 49.2%; 29 27.2%; 25 28.6%; 59 36.1%; 48 30.6%; 22 34.8%; 54 26.9%; 21 48.8%; 40

N/A 1.7%; 1 3.3%; 3 6.8%; 14 12.0%; 16 8.3%; 6 1.3%; 2 1.3%; 1 17.1%; 14

Totals 100.0%; 59 100.0%; 92 100.0%; 206 100.0%;

133100.0%; 72 100.0%; 155 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 82

(B) Sign a petition to request better enforcement of the regulations in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Easy

23.7% 32.6% 50.5% 53.4% 58.3% 55.5% 78.2% 29.3%

Difficult 32.2% 13.0% 19.9% 2.3% 13.9% 14.8% 7.7% 8.5%

Not sure 40.7% 51.1% 22.8% 32.3% 19.4% 29.7% 12.8% 43.9%

N/A 3.4% 3.3% 6.8% 12.0% 8.3% 0.0% 1.3% 18.3%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(C) Run a Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Committee every month Easy

27.1% 56.5% 36.4% 54.9% 52.8% 34.8% 57.7% 25.6%

Difficult 18.6% 12.0% 20.4% 0.8% 13.9% 13.5% 19.2% 11.0%

Target Audience:

TA 1A TA 1B TA 2A TA 2B TA 3 TA 4A TA 4B TA 5 (City

180

(Taloto resident fishers) pre-selected 6.3%, 59

(Ubujan resident fishers) pre-selected 11.5%, 107

( Taloto local community) random 22.4%, 208

(Ubujan local community) random 17.5%, 163

(Management committee) pre-selected 8.0%, 74

(Manga resident fishers) pre-selected 16.8%, 156

( Booy resident fishers) pre-selected 8.4%, 78

officials and employees) pre-selected 9.1%, 85

Not sure 45.8% 29.3% 35.9% 32.3% 23.6% 49.0% 20.5% 46.3%

N/A 8.5% 2.2% 7.3% 12.0% 9.7% 2.6% 2.6% 17.1%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(D) Attend community assemblies regarding Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Easy

37.3% 65.2% 54.1% 51.9% 65.3% 48.4% 79.5% 28.0%

Difficult 16.9% 7.6% 8.3% 1.5% 4.2% 13.5% 9.0% 6.1%

Not sure 44.1% 26.1% 31.2% 34.6% 22.2% 37.4% 9.0% 48.8%

N/A 1.7% 1.1% 6.3% 12.0% 8.3% 0.6% 2.6% 17.1%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(E) Act as community intelligence to the Mabaw Marine

22.4% 56.5% 23.8% 51.1% 49.3% 42.6% 70.5% 31.7%

181

Sanctuary Easy

Difficult 20.7% 20.7% 21.4% 1.5% 11.3% 15.5% 10.3% 8.5%

Not sure 51.7% 20.7% 47.1% 35.3% 25.4% 41.3% 16.7% 46.3%

N/A 5.2% 2.2% 7.8% 12.0% 14.1% 0.6% 2.6% 13.4%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Most of the respondents find it easy to attend meetings related to Mabaw reef , except for the City Hall employees. In terms of signing a petition for a better MPA enforcement, most of the fishers from Taloto (40%) and Ubujan (50%) are unsure . The fishers in Booy (70%) and Manga (42%) have high percentages in terms of acting as community intelligence.

Q31. Percentage of TA who believe that MPA rules are regularly enforced

(F) The rules of the no-take area are regularly enforced so that violators are caught and punished

Target Audience:

Overall (934)









SA 157 17.8%

2 3.4%

14 15.2%

15 7.3%

33 24.8%

8 11.1%

42 27.1%

16 20.5%

27 32.9%

182

A 502 57.0%

45 76.3%

46 50.0%

111 53.9%

79 59.4%

38 52.8%

89 57.4%

52 66.7%

39 47.6%

D 62 7.0%

6 10.2%

9 9.8%

18 8.7%

2 1.5%

3 4.2%

14 9.0%

7 9.0%

3 3.7%

SD 12 1.4%

0 0.0%

8 8.7%

0 0.0%

0 0.0%

1 1.4%

2 1.3%

0 0.0%

1 1.2%

NS/DK 147 16.7%

6 10.2%

15 16.3%

62 30.1%

19 14.3%

22 30.6%

8 5.2%

3 3.8%

12 14.6%

Totals 880 100.0%

59 100.0%

92 100.0%

206 100.0%

133 100.0%

72 100.0%

155 100.0%

78 100.0%

82 100.0%

Section 7: Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Knowledge in Interpersonal Communication Objectives

Percentage of TAs who have talked about the benefits of a well-enforced MPA

Target Audience:





TA 3 (Management committee) pre-



TA 5 (City officials and employee

183

selected 6.3%, 59

selected 11.5%, 107

22.4%, 208

17.5%, 163

selected 8.0%, 74

selected 16.8%, 156

selected 8.4%, 78

s) pre-selected 9.1%, 85

(32) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about benefits to the community of a well enforced sanctuary? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you have talked to about Have not talked to anyone

84.7%; 50

48.9%; 45

90.8%; 187 71.2%; 94 56.9%; 41 49.0%;

7693.6%; 73

84.0%; 68

Talked to spouse/partner 1.7%; 1 34.8%; 32 1.9%; 4 12.1%; 16 12.5%; 9 15.5%;

24 1.3%; 1 6.2%; 5

Talked to parents, or in-laws 0.0%; 0 4.3%; 4 0.0%; 0 2.3%; 3 4.2%; 3 14.8%; 23 1.3%; 1 1.2%; 1

Talked to your children aged 16 or older 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.8%; 2 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 1.2%; 1

Talked to your children aged 15 or younger 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 1.2%; 1

Talked to friend or neighbor 6.8%; 4 16.3%; 15 2.9%; 6 19.7%; 26 16.7%; 12 24.5%;

38 1.3%; 1 8.6%; 7

Talked to village elder 1.7%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.5%; 3 0.0%; 0 2.8%; 2 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.2%; 1

Talked to National government environmental officials 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.8%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 3.7%; 3

Talked to Non-government environment officials 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 3.7%; 3

Talked to Local government environmental officials 0.0%; 0 1.1%; 1 1.9%; 4 0.0%; 0 13.9%; 10 10.3%;

16 0.0%; 0 6.2%; 5

Talked to a Local Mabaw Fisher or Gleaner 5.1%; 3 1.1%; 1 1.0%; 2 0.8%; 1 5.6%; 4 11.6%; 18 3.8%; 3 3.7%; 3

184

Other 1.7%; 1 2.2%; 2 1.5%; 3 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 1.3%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Most respondents have you talked to anyone about benefits to the community of a well enforced sanctuary in the last 6 months. Thirty-four percent (34%) of the Ubujan fishers have talked to their spouse/ partner. And, only a few of the fishers from Taloto and Ubujan and the two other neighboring barangays who have talked to the other fishers in their respective communities.

TAs subject for discussion about a well-enforced MPA

Target Audience:









(A) If you did talk, what was the main thing you discussed? Increase fish and corals

7.0%; 4 14.1%; 12 4.4%; 9 21.2%; 28 20.0%; 13 16.1%;

25 3.8%; 3 8.6%; 7

Increase income 1.8%; 1 7.1%; 6 2.4%; 5 10.6%; 14 0.0%; 0 8.4%; 13 1.3%; 1 2.5%; 2

Livelihood 1.8%; 1 34.1%; 29 2.4%; 5 3.0%; 4 4.6%; 3 24.5%;

38 2.6%; 2 4.9%; 4

ecotourism project 0.0%; 0 1.2%; 1 1.0%; 2 3.8%; 5 9.2%; 6 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 4.9%; 4

Knowledge to protect marine 5.3%; 3 5.9%; 5 3.9%; 8 0.8%; 1 16.9%; 11 3.2%; 5 2.6%; 2 6.2%; 5

185

resources

N/A 84.2%; 48

38.8%; 33 89.8%; 184 60.6%; 80 55.4%; 36 47.1%;

7393.6%; 73 82.7%; 67

Other 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.5%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Percentage of fishers who have talked about their role in the management of Mabaw MS

TAs who have talked on Q7:Target Audience:

Non-resident fishers 25.2%, 234







(33) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anyone about your roles in the proper management of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in order to benefit their community? If you have, please tell me all of the people Have not talked to anyone

63.9%; 149

92.7%; 191

75.8%; 100

56.5%; 52 90.1%; 73 65.3%; 47 88.1%;

52

Talked to spouse/partner 12.4%; 29 2.4%; 5 7.6%; 10 25.0%; 23 6.2%; 5 11.1%; 8 6.8%; 4

Talked to parents, or in-laws 10.7%; 25 0.0%; 0 0.8%; 1 3.3%; 3 1.2%; 1 5.6%; 4 0.0%; 0

Talked to your children aged 16 or older 0.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.1%; 1 1.2%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

186

Talked to your children aged 15 or younger 0.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.5%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Talked to friend or neighbor 14.2%; 33 2.4%; 5 18.9%; 25 15.2%; 14 3.7%; 3 9.7%; 7 5.1%; 3

Talked to village elder 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 3.7%; 3 2.8%; 2 0.0%; 0

Talked to National government environmental officials 0.9%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.5%; 2 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0

Talked to Non-government environment officials 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 3.7%; 3 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0

Talked to Local government environmental officials 6.4%; 15 1.0%; 2 0.0%; 0 1.1%; 1 2.5%; 2 9.7%; 7 0.0%; 0

Talked to a Local Mabaw Fisher or Gleaner 10.3%; 24 1.0%; 2 0.8%; 1 0.0%; 0 4.9%; 4 4.2%; 3 1.7%; 1

Other 0.9%; 2 0.5%; 1 0.8%; 1 1.1%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Most of respondent were not able to talk about their role in the proper management of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. A few of them like the fishers in Ubujan were able to talk about their roles in the proper management with their spouse, other were able to talk to their friends and next door neighbor. Only very few of the fishers from among the respondents who were able to talk to other fishers in the community. The topics of those respondents who were able to talk with their talked spouse, friend and neighbors were about composition and functions of Mabaw Management Committee and coordination of the city government to the management committee.

TAs subject of discussion about their roles in the management of Mabaw MS

Target Audience:

TA 1A (Taloto resident

TA 1B (Ubujan residen

TA 2A ( Taloto local commun

TA 2B (Ubujan local commun

TA 3 (Management committe

TA 4A (Manga residen

TA 4B ( Booy resident


187

fishers) pre-selected 6.3%, 59

t fishers) pre-selected 11.5%, 107

ity) random 22.4%, 208

ity) random 17.5%, 163

e) pre-selected 8.0%, 74

t fishers) pre-selected 16.8%, 156

fishers) pre-selected 8.4%, 78

employees) pre-selected

9.1%, 85

(A) If you did talk about this, what was the main thing you discussed? Composition and function of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management Committee

10.7%; 6

21.2%; 18 2.9%; 6 9.8%; 13 16.7%; 11 14.2%;

220.0%; 0 4.9%; 4

Coordination of the City LGU to the Management Committee

1.8%; 1

4.7%; 4 2.4%; 5 1.5%; 2 12.1%; 8 11.0%;

170.0%; 0 9.9%; 8

Sharing of revenues from user fees, fines and penalty 0.0%; 0

7.1%; 6 0.5%; 1 3.0%; 4 0.0%; 0 1.9%;

31.3%; 1 3.7%; 3

Sanction for members of the management team violating Mabaw MS ordinance

0.0%; 0

11.8%; 10 1.0%; 2 21.2%;

28 9.1%; 6 20.6%; 32

0.0%; 0 4.9%; 4

None of the above 0.0%; 0

0.0%; 0 0.5%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%;

00.0%; 0 1.2%; 1

N/A 87.5%; 49

55.3%; 47

93.2%; 191

64.4%; 85 65.2%; 43 52.9%;

8298.7%; 77

88.9%; 72

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Resident fishers who talked with others on the consequences of breaking the Mabaw MS rules

(34) In the past 6 Target Audience:

188

months, have you talked to anyone about "the consequences of breaking the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary laws, rules & regulations"? If you have, please tell me all of the people with whom you h

Overall (934)


Taloto and Ubujan resident fishers (17.8%, 166)






Percents0 100

Have not talked to anyone

667 76.1%

188 91.3%

103 68.2%

99 75.0%

82 52.9%

75 92.6%

74 94.9%

44 62.0%

Combined answer have talked to anyone

212 24.2%

18 8.7%

48 31.8%

34 25.8%

73 47.1%

6 7.4%

5 6.4%

27 38.0%

Totals877 100.0%

206 100.0%

151 100.0%

132 100.0%

155 100.0%

81 100.0%

78 100.0%

71 100.0%

Percentage of TA who talked about their roles in reporting intrusions in the MPA

Target Audience:




22.4%, 208


17.5%, 163





189

(35) In the past 6 months, have you talked to anybody about your role in reporting intrusions into the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Mabaw Marine Sanctuary? If you have, please tell me of the people whom you talk Have not talked to anyone

94.9%; 56

63.0%; 58

95.6%; 197

87.9%; 116 76.1%; 54 60.0%;

9393.6%; 73

91.3%; 73

Talked to spouse/ partner 1.7%; 1 18.5%; 17 1.0%; 2 10.6%; 14 9.9%; 7 14.8%;

23 1.3%; 1 3.8%; 3

Talk to parents, or in-laws 0.0%; 0 2.2%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.8%; 1 1.4%; 1 3.2%; 5 1.3%; 1 1.3%; 1

Talked to my children aged 16 or older 0.0%; 0 1.1%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 0.0%; 0

Talked to my children aged 15 or younger 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 1.3%; 1

Talked to National Government Environmental Official 3.4%; 2 13.0%;

12 0.0%; 0 0.8%; 1 1.4%; 1 1.3%; 2 0.0%; 0 2.5%; 2

Talk to Non-government Environmental Officials 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.5%; 2

Talked to Local Government Environmental Officials 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 4 0.0%; 0 12.7%; 9 21.9%;

34 0.0%; 0 3.8%; 3

Talked to local Mabaw Fisher or Gleaner 0.0%; 0 2.2%; 2 0.5%; 1 0.0%; 0 5.6%; 4 11.0%; 17 5.1%; 4 3.8%; 3

Other:_________ 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Majority of the target audiences have not talked to anybody about their role in reporting intrusions into the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Mabaw Marine Sanctuary in the past 6 month. In the Taloto and Ubujan fishers, only two fishers were able to talk to other fishers in the community about their role in reporting MPA violations.

190

Section 8: Establish Baselines for and Measure Change in Behavior SMART Objectives

Q36. Percentage of TA who remembered someone fishing in the NTZ

Target Audience:









(A) Subsistence fishers from your village Seen

54.2%; 32 32.6%; 30 12.1%; 25 9.8%; 13 23.6%; 17 38.7%; 60 16.7%; 13 2.5%; 2

191

Not seen 25.4%; 15 41.3%; 38 69.4%; 143 24.2%; 32 36.1%; 26 43.2%; 67 82.1%; 64 38.8%; 31

Not sure / Don't remember 20.3%; 12 26.1%; 24 18.4%; 38 65.9%; 87 40.3%; 29 18.1%; 28 1.3%; 1 58.8%; 47

Totals 100.0%; 59 100.0%; 92 100.0%; 206 100.0%; 132 100.0%; 72 100.0%; 155 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 80

(B) Subsistence fishers from nearby villages Seen

54.2% 32.6% 12.1% 9.8% 22.2% 35.5% 14.1% 2.5%

Not seen 27.1% 41.3% 68.9% 24.2% 36.1% 34.8% 83.3% 40.0%

Not sure / Don't remember 18.6% 26.1% 18.9% 65.9% 41.7% 29.7% 2.6% 57.5%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(C) Subsistence fishers from outside areas Seen

10.2% 14.1% 3.4% 3.8% 13.9% 14.8% 11.5% 1.3%

Not seen 49.2% 48.9% 74.3% 26.5% 41.7% 52.9% 84.6% 41.3%


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Target Audience:








TA 5 (City officials and employees) pre-

192

selected 6.3%, 59

selected 11.5%, 107 22.4%, 208 17.5%, 163 16.8%, 156 selected

8.4%, 78selected 9.1%, 85

Mean - - - - - - - -

(D) Small scale commercial fishers from your village Seen

1.7% 21.7% 0.5% 6.1% 9.7% 17.4% 9.0% 0.0%

Not seen 64.4% 45.7% 79.1% 28.0% 41.7% 51.6% 87.2% 41.3%


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(E) Small scale commercial fishers from nearby village Seen

3.4% 15.2% 1.0% 4.5% 8.3% 18.1% 10.3% 0.0%

Not seen 67.8% 47.8% 78.2% 28.8% 40.3% 52.9% 84.6% 41.3%


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(F) Small scale commercial fishers from outside areas Seen

0.0% 4.3% 0.5% 1.5% 6.9% 11.0% 10.3% 0.0%

193

Not seen 74.6% 55.4% 77.2% 29.5% 38.9% 56.8% 85.9% 41.3%


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Target Audience:









Mean - - - - - - - -

(G) Commercial fishers using trawls, ring net, etc Seen

5.1% 19.6% 1.9% 4.5% 15.3% 32.3% 16.7% 0.0%

Not seen 72.9% 50.0% 76.2% 27.3% 38.9% 40.0% 82.1% 41.3%


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(H) Large-scale industrial fishers using large trawls, purse seiner Seen

0.0% 7.6% 0.0% 3.0% 5.6% 3.9% 10.3% 0.0%

Not seen 74.6% 57.6% 81.1% 29.5% 38.9% 60.0% 88.5% 40.0%

194


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(I) Sports / Game fishers targeting Tuna, Bill fish, marlins etc Seen

1.7% 2.2% 0.5% 3.0% 4.2% 1.9% 11.5% 0.0%

Not seen 78.0% 57.8% 82.0% 29.5% 39.4% 60.6% 87.2% 40.0%


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(J) Other resource users specializing in target fish such as aquarium fish, mollusks (trochus) and liv

Seen

6.8% 3.3% 4.4% 2.3% 7.1% 3.2% 15.4% 0.0%

Not seen 72.9% 57.1% 79.6% 31.3% 42.9% 55.5% 80.8% 40.0%


Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

195

Q38. Percentage of TA who say they have been involved in the creation/ management of the MPA

Target Audience:









(A) Regularly involved 0.0%; 0 17.4%; 16 1.5%; 3 1.5%; 2 5.6%; 4 0.0%; 0 6.4%; 5 2.5%; 2

Occasionally involved 28.8%; 17 13.0%; 12 8.7%; 18 31.8%; 42 41.7%; 30 43.5%; 67 9.0%; 7 4.9%; 4

Never involved 47.5%; 28 40.2%; 37 64.1%; 132 31.8%; 42 34.7%; 25 27.9%; 43 76.9%; 60 35.8%; 29

Don't know / not applicable 23.7%; 14 29.3%; 27 25.7%; 53 34.8%; 46 18.1%; 13 28.6%; 44 7.7%; 6 56.8%; 46

Totals 100.0%; 59 100.0%; 92 100.0%; 206 100.0%; 132 100.0%; 72 100.0%; 154 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 81

There were more fishers from Taloto (28.8%) compared to Ubujan (13%) who were occasionally involved in the management of the MPA. However, highest percentages from across all target audiences were not involved in the creation/ management of Mabaw MS. Only 17.% of the fishers from Ubujan were involved regularly and nobody in barangay Taloto.

Opinion of the target audiences of who to report someone who has broken the rules and regulations of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary

196

Target Audience:









(39) If you were to report someone who has broken the rules and regulations of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary, who would you report them to? You can choose more than one answer. Local police

5.1%; 3 5.4%; 5 14.1%; 29 3.8%; 5 21.1%; 15 2.6%; 4 30.8%; 24 19.8%; 16

Bantay Dagat 16.9%; 10 9.8%; 9 24.8%; 51 5.3%; 7 40.8%; 29 53.2%; 82 3.8%; 3 30.9%; 25

Barangay captain 57.6%; 34 66.3%; 61 56.8%; 117 76.5%; 101 59.2%; 42 51.9%; 80 93.6%; 73 53.1%; 43

City mayor 1.7%; 1 6.5%; 6 2.4%; 5 5.3%; 7 2.8%; 2 13.0%; 20 2.6%; 2 4.9%; 4

Next door neighbor 0.0%; 0 3.3%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.8%; 1 2.8%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Husband/ wife 5.1%; 3 1.1%; 1 1.9%; 4 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.6%; 1 1.3%; 1 0.0%; 0

fisher 13.6%; 8 13.0%; 12 3.9%; 8 0.8%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 2 6.4%; 5 0.0%; 0

would not report 11.9%; 7 3.3%; 3 5.8%; 12 1.5%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.2%; 1

other: 1.7%; 1 0.0%; 0 13.1%; 27 10.6%; 14 9.9%; 7 14.9%; 23 0.0%; 0 6.2%; 5

197

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Majority of the target audiences prefer to report to the Barangay Captain if someone has broken the rules and regulations of the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary. The figures shown above are higher than those target audiences who would report to the bantay dagat and the local police.

Section 9: Understand Barriers & Benefits of Behavior Change

Barrier in establishing the Mabaw MS Management Committee

Target Audience:









9.1%, 85

(40) What barriers might there be establishing the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management committee?( Do not read out options to the respondents) Lack of interest

39.0%; 23 32.6%; 30 27.9%; 57 42.4%; 56 40.8%; 29 25.3%; 39 2.6%; 2 30.9%; 25

Political intervention 8.5%; 5 5.4%; 5 27.5%; 56 2.3%; 3 26.8%; 19 5.8%; 9 27.3%; 21 19.8%; 16

198

Lack of legal support to establish the committee 11.9%; 7 5.4%; 5 11.3%; 23 4.5%; 6 11.3%; 8 13.0%; 20 11.7%; 9 23.5%; 19

Lack of budget 20.3%; 12 46.7%; 43 45.1%; 92 16.7%; 22 33.8%; 24 53.9%; 83 19.5%; 15 30.9%; 25

Unclear management structure 10.2%; 6 5.4%; 5 5.4%; 11 2.3%; 3 7.0%; 5 24.7%; 38 7.8%; 6 6.2%; 5

Lack of knowledge on the importance of Management council

22.0%; 13 4.3%; 4 11.8%; 24 12.9%; 17 5.6%; 4 0.6%; 1 1.3%; 1 7.4%; 6

Conflicting interest of involve individuals 1.7%; 1 7.6%; 7 2.9%; 6 2.3%; 3 23.9%; 17 0.6%; 1 1.3%; 1 7.4%; 6

Not a priority 18.6%; 11 1.1%; 1 10.8%; 22 2.3%; 3 2.8%; 2 5.8%; 9 6.5%; 5 9.9%; 8

None of the above 13.6%; 8 5.4%; 5 4.9%; 10 19.7%; 26 0.0%; 0 16.2%; 25 35.1%; 27 12.3%; 10

Others: __________ 6.8%; 4 0.0%; 0 6.4%; 13 6.8%; 9 8.5%; 6 13.6%; 21 0.0%; 0 8.6%; 7

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Opinion of the TAs on good incentive of those who will stop intruding in Mabaw MS

Target Audience:









199

(41) If you were to encourage a friend to stop intruding in the MPA to fish, what would you suggest would be a good incentive? receive public recognition by the Mayor

10.2%; 6 32.6%; 30 17.1%; 35 52.3%; 69 31.9%; 23 3.2%; 5 7.7%; 6 23.8%; 19

receive public recognition in the media 1.7%; 1 4.3%; 4 2.0%; 4 6.8%; 9 13.9%; 10 2.6%; 4 2.6%; 2 2.5%; 2

be celebrated at a fiesta 6.8%; 4 4.3%; 4 2.0%; 4 3.8%; 5 0.0%; 0 1.9%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

receive an award 16.9%; 10 17.4%; 16 20.0%; 41 11.4%; 15 11.1%; 8 33.8%; 52 42.3%; 33 31.3%; 25

knowing that you are protecting the food security of the children in the community

3.4%; 2 17.4%; 16 13.2%; 27 14.4%; 19 31.9%; 23 22.7%; 35 3.8%; 3 13.8%; 11

more and bigger fish in the future 37.3%; 22 19.6%; 18 26.3%; 54 6.8%; 9 4.2%; 3 11.7%; 18 46.2%; 36 10.0%; 8

Other 3.4%; 2 1.1%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

wala 1.7%; 1 1.1%; 1 1.5%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

wala kabalo 15.3%; 9 2.2%; 2 3.9%; 8 6.8%; 9 0.0%; 0 13.0%; 20 2.6%; 2 0.0%; 0

wala lang 1.7%; 1 0.0%; 0 14.1%; 29 0.8%; 1 9.7%; 7 13.0%; 20 0.0%; 0 20.0%; 16

Other 1.7%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.6%; 1 0.0%; 0 2.5%; 2

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

200

Suggestion on a good incentive to those who attend Mabaw MS activities

Target Audience:









(42) If you were to encourage a friend to take part in the Mabaw Marine Sanctuary Management meetings, what would you suggest would be a good incentive? receive public recognition by the Mayor

18.0%; 37 53.0%; 70 7.1%; 11 27.2%; 25 20.0%; 16 7.7%; 6 26.4%; 19 8.6%; 5

receive public recognition in the media 2.9%; 6 7.6%; 10 3.2%; 5 5.4%; 5 2.5%; 2 2.6%; 2 12.5%; 9 1.7%; 1

be celebrated at a fiesta 1.9%; 4 2.3%; 3 1.9%; 3 4.3%; 4 1.3%; 1 1.3%; 1 0.0%; 0 3.4%; 2

receive an award 20.4%; 42 14.4%; 19 34.4%; 53 23.9%; 22 35.0%; 28 42.3%; 33 12.5%; 9 20.7%; 12

knowing that you are protecting the food security of the children in the community

13.1%; 27 13.6%; 18 18.2%; 28 13.0%; 12 13.8%; 11 0.0%; 0 37.5%; 27 5.2%; 3

more and bigger fish in the future 23.3%; 48 3.8%; 5 11.0%; 17 22.8%; 21 11.3%; 9 50.0%; 39 5.6%; 4 36.2%; 21

Dont know 4.4%; 9 6.8%; 9 20.8%; 32 1.1%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.3%; 1 0.0%; 0 19.0%;

201

11

pasalamat 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.6%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

wala 0.5%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.1%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.7%; 1

wala lang 15.5%; 32 0.8%; 1 5.8%; 9 0.0%; 0 21.3%; 17 0.0%; 0 9.7%; 7 1.7%; 1

Other 1.9%; 4 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.1%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 1.7%; 1

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Section 10: Exposure to Campaign Activities and Messages

Q43. Ways on which TAs remembered seeing/hearing about Mabaw MS

Target Audience:









(A) Local newspapers-Exposure Yes

5.8%; 12 14.5%; 19 33.8%; 52 31.5%; 29 26.3%; 21 15.4%; 12 34.7%; 25 5.1%; 3

No 55.3%; 114 16.8%; 22 32.5%; 50 33.7%; 31 23.8%; 19 60.3%; 47 27.8%; 20 50.8%; 30

202

Don't know 38.8%; 80 68.7%; 90 33.8%; 52 34.8%; 32 50.0%; 40 24.4%; 19 37.5%; 27 44.1%; 26

Totals 100.0%; 206 100.0%; 131 100.0%; 154 100.0%; 92 100.0%; 80 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 72 100.0%; 59

Mean 1.67 1.46 2.00 1.97 1.76 1.91 1.97 1.61

(B) Local radio stations-Exposure Yes

14.6% 15.3% 63.6% 40.2% 33.8% 42.3% 45.8% 18.6%

No 49.5% 16.0% 13.6% 27.2% 18.8% 35.9% 20.8% 42.4%

Don't know 35.9% 68.7% 22.7% 32.6% 47.5% 21.8% 33.3% 39.0%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean 1.79 1.47 2.41 2.08 1.86 2.21 2.13 1.80

(C) Religious program/ activities-Exposure Yes

1.5% 6.9% 29.9% 21.7% 11.3% 15.4% 8.3% 6.8%

No 55.8% 23.7% 28.6% 42.4% 38.8% 60.3% 37.5% 50.8%

Don't know 42.7% 69.5% 41.6% 35.9% 50.0% 24.4% 54.2% 42.4%

Target Audience:









203

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean 1.59 1.37 1.88 1.86 1.61 1.91 1.54 1.64

(E) Poster or billboard-Exposure Yes

1.0% 8.4% 9.1% 20.7% 17.5% 9.0% 8.3% 3.4%

No 61.2% 17.6% 35.7% 39.1% 30.0% 64.1% 38.9% 55.9%

Don't know 37.9% 74.0% 55.2% 40.2% 52.5% 26.9% 52.8% 40.7%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean 1.63 1.34 1.54 1.80 1.65 1.82 1.56 1.63

(F) Printed Booklet-Exposure Yes

0.5% 3.8% 11.0% 4.3% 15.0% 5.1% 6.9% 1.7%

No 61.2% 20.6% 45.5% 54.3% 31.3% 67.9% 38.9% 59.3%

Don't know 38.3% 75.6% 43.5% 41.3% 53.8% 26.9% 54.2% 39.0%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean 1.62 1.28 1.68 1.63 1.61 1.78 1.53 1.63

(G) Public Meeting (Festival)-Exposure Yes

32.7% 11.5% 42.2% 22.2% 16.3% 24.4% 38.2% 23.7%

No 39.5% 14.5% 17.5% 31.1% 31.3% 52.6% 19.1% 40.7%

Don't know 27.8% 74.0% 40.3% 46.7% 52.5% 23.1% 42.6% 35.6%

204

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean 2.05 1.37 2.02 1.76 1.64 2.01 1.96 1.88

Section 11: Ground Truthing

3 creatures found in Tagbilaran the respondent are proud of

Target Audience:









9.1%, 85

(46) Please name 3 creatures that are found in Tagbilaran seawaters that you are particularly fond or proud of? Do not read out options, but tick box as appropriate and/or fill the blank for any additional Parrotfish

38.6%; 22 52.2%; 48 46.3%; 94 45.0%; 59 50.0%; 36 77.9%; 120 48.6%; 36 39.0%; 32

Snapper fish 45.6%; 26 23.9%; 22 31.0%; 63 20.6%; 27 25.0%; 18 79.2%; 122 1.4%; 1 28.0%; 23

Butterflyfish 33.3%; 19 13.0%; 12 22.2%; 45 7.6%; 10 12.5%; 9 22.7%; 35 13.5%; 10 12.2%; 10

205

Clownlfish (nemo) 47.4%; 27 20.7%; 19 36.5%; 74 22.9%; 30 31.9%; 23 24.7%; 38 31.1%; 23 23.2%; 19

giant clam 3.5%; 2 5.4%; 5 11.3%; 23 25.2%; 33 11.1%; 8 0.6%; 1 18.9%; 14 3.7%; 3

sea turtle 1.8%; 1 9.8%; 9 4.4%; 9 5.3%; 7 12.5%; 9 3.2%; 5 10.8%; 8 8.5%; 7

Starfish 7.0%; 4 18.5%; 17 5.4%; 11 55.7%; 73 2.8%; 2 5.2%; 8 5.4%; 4 7.3%; 6

Rabbit fish 26.3%; 15 45.7%; 42 29.6%; 60 48.9%; 64 33.3%; 24 69.5%; 107 60.8%; 45 28.0%; 23

N/A 1.8%; 1 0.0%; 0 9.4%; 19 2.3%; 3 11.1%; 8 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 12.2%; 10

anduhaw 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.8%; 1 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

anduhaw, solid, utdan 0.0%; 0 2.2%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

any fish 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.5%; 3 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

aquarium fish 1.8%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Target Audience:









9.1%, 85

bakasi 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.8%; 1 2.8%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

bangsi 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.8%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.2%; 1

bangus 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

bulinaw 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.8%; 1 2.8%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

corals 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.5%; 3 0.0%; 0 4.2%; 3 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 3.7%; 3

206

katambak 1.8%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 1.2%; 1

kinhason 0.0%; 0 1.1%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

kinhason, swake 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.8%; 1 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

kitong 3.5%; 2 3.3%; 3 3.0%; 6 0.8%; 1 1.4%; 1 2.6%; 4 0.0%; 0 1.2%; 1

kitong, solid, pugapo 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.0%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

mangrove 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.5%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

mga kinhason 0.0%; 0 2.2%; 2 0.0%; 0 1.5%; 2 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

shells 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 2.3%; 3 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0

solid 0.0%; 0 1.1%; 1 0.5%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

tulingan 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 1.5%; 3 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0

Other 14.0%; 8 6.5%; 6 7.9%; 16 8.4%; 11 5.6%; 4 1.9%; 3 13.5%; 10 12.2%; 10

Not Applicable 7.0%; 4 1.1%; 1 3.9%; 8 3.1%; 4 1.4%; 1 0.0%; 0 1.4%; 1 6.1%; 5

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

Flagship Species

(47) Please have a look at the 4 photographs labeled A,B,C,D. Which of the sea creatures

Target Audience:

Overall (934)


Taloto and Ubujan fishers (17.8%, 166)


TA 4A (Manga resident fishers) pre-selected (16.8%,


TA 4B ( Booy resident fishers) pre-selected (8.4%,


Percent0 100

207

shown on the photographs do you like

156) 78)

Clownfish 274 35.5%

79 39.9%

35 24.0%

22 23.4%

39 28.5%

45 59.2%

13 23.2%

39 62.9%

Parrotfish 150 19.5%

29 14.6%

36 24.7%

29 30.9%

31 22.6%

8 10.5%

9 16.1%

8 12.9%

Goatfish 226 29.3%

59 29.8%

53 36.3%

15 16.0%

60 43.8%

10 13.2%

22 39.3%

7 11.3%

Rabbitfish 150 19.5%

42 21.2%

26 17.8%

30 31.9%

15 10.9%

14 18.4%

15 26.8%

8 12.9%

Totals 771 n/a

198 n/a

146 n/a

94 n/a

137 n/a

76 n/a

56 n/a

62 n/a

Perception of the TA on Climate Change

Target Audience:









208

22.4%, 208 17.5%, 163 selected 16.8%, 156

selected 11.5%, 107 9.1%, 85 selected

8.4%, 78 8.0%, 74 selected 6.3%, 59

(A) Climate change is not going to cause any problems in my community SA

1.0%; 2 10.6%; 14 7.2%; 11 4.5%; 4 31.6%; 25 5.1%; 4 9.7%; 7 3.4%; 2

A 16.1%; 33 32.6%; 43 39.2%; 60 50.6%; 45 13.9%; 11 30.8%; 24 30.6%; 22 18.6%; 11

D 59.5%; 122 9.8%; 13 39.9%; 61 20.2%; 18 21.5%; 17 55.1%; 43 37.5%; 27 47.5%; 28

SD 13.2%; 27 6.1%; 8 2.6%; 4 5.6%; 5 10.1%; 8 5.1%; 4 12.5%; 9 10.2%; 6

NS/DK 10.2%; 21 40.9%; 54 11.1%; 17 19.1%; 17 22.8%; 18 3.8%; 3 9.7%; 7 20.3%; 12

Totals 100.0%; 205 100.0%; 132 100.0%; 153 100.0%; 89 100.0%; 79 100.0%; 78 100.0%; 72 100.0%; 59

(B) Climate change is already a problem in my community SA

21.0% 8.3% 26.8% 4.5% 36.7% 14.1% 26.4% 20.3%

A 64.9% 61.4% 63.4% 79.5% 40.5% 79.5% 52.8% 61.0%

D 3.4% 3.0% 2.0% 4.5% 0.0% 3.8% 8.3% 8.5%

SD 0.5% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 2.5% 1.3% 0.0% 1.7%

NS/DK 10.2% 27.3% 7.2% 11.4% 20.3% 1.3% 12.5% 8.5%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

209

Mean - - - - - - - -

Target Audience:









(C) Climate change is likely to become a real problem for my community in the coming 5-10 years SA

14.6% 7.6% 26.1% 4.5% 41.8% 15.4% 25.0% 22.0%

A 60.5% 60.6% 64.1% 73.9% 32.9% 75.6% 51.4% 54.2%

D 2.4% 5.3% 2.6% 2.3% 1.3% 5.1% 4.2% 5.1%

SD 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 1.3% 0.0% 2.8% 0.0%

NS/DK 20.5% 26.5% 7.2% 18.2% 22.8% 3.8% 16.7% 18.6%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

(D) If our local NTZ is well managed it will help

11.2% 12.1% 24.2% 4.5% 32.9% 12.8% 11.1% 13.6%

210

buffer some of the effects of climate change in the SA

A 42.4% 54.5% 63.4% 61.4% 31.6% 78.2% 52.8% 54.2%

D 2.4% 3.8% 2.6% 4.5% 2.5% 5.1% 0.0% 1.7%

SD 1.0% 0.0% 0.7% 1.1% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7%

NS/DK 42.9% 29.5% 9.2% 28.4% 31.6% 3.8% 36.1% 28.8%

Totals 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Mean - - - - - - - -

Perception of the TA on the effects of climate change

Target Audience:









9.1%, 85

211

(50) Name up to 3 ways in which you believe climate change could affect your community in the next 5-10 years (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS - SELECT UP TO 3) sea level rise

46.6%; 27

58.0%; 51

27.8%; 57

52.3%; 69

43.1%; 31

47.7%; 73

15.4%; 12

26.6%; 21

increased water temperature leading death of corals and less fish

24.1%; 14

23.9%; 21

19.0%; 39

35.6%; 47

29.2%; 21

55.6%; 85

28.2%; 22

34.2%; 27

ncrease of typhoon frequency 46.6%; 27

47.7%; 42

42.0%; 86

44.7%; 59

29.2%; 21

28.8%; 44

56.4%; 44

20.3%; 16

increase of typhoon strength, less reliable work and crops 34.5%; 20

48.9%; 43

35.1%; 72

25.0%; 33

33.3%; 24

22.9%; 35

26.9%; 21

25.3%; 20

more people from the upland will move to the coastal areas in case of crop failure

22.4%; 13

20.5%; 18

27.8%; 57

10.6%; 14

13.9%; 10

23.5%; 36

15.4%; 12

13.9%; 11

change in weather patterns 44.8%; 26

33.0%; 29

54.1%; 111

46.2%; 61

51.4%; 37

56.2%; 86

82.1%; 64

43.0%; 34

less rain 12.1%; 7

12.5%; 11 4.9%; 10 7.6%; 10 6.9%; 5 2.0%;

39.0%; 7

10.1%; 8

N/A 13.8%; 8

0.0%; 0

14.1%; 29

20.5%; 27 11.1%; 8 7.2%;

111.3%; 1

16.5%; 13

Other 0.0%; 0

1.1%; 1 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.0%; 0 0.7%;

10.0%; 0 6.3%; 5

Totals *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; * *; *

212

2.EcoGov MPA Effectiveness Rating

Met/Needs work

No. Criteria/Activity Satisfied Evidence (delete those that are not available in the site and add

additional evidence if available) LEVEL 1 – MPA IS INITIATED [Gisugdan ang paghunahuna sa MPA]

3 1 MPA concept explained and accepted [Ang concepto/hunahuna sa MPA gipasabot ug nasabtan]

Orientation/consultation proceedingsAttendance sheets [ang attendance sheets naa sa opis-giattach sa liquidation]

(Orientation on MPAs for affected stakeholders from various sectors conducted. Social acceptance sought through community consultations /public hearings composed of representatives from various sectors) [Pagpasabot unsa ang MPA ngadto sa lain-laing sector sa katilingban. Nakuha ang pag-uyon sa katawhan pinaagi sa community consultation/public hearings nga gilangkoban sa matag sector]

1 2 Site surveyed using standard methods with baseline assessment complete, conducted in a participatory process

Survey reports [Servando Toledo-CRAFMC]

(Reports completed on fish abundance, coral cover and profile on community and coastal management) [Kompleto ang baseline nga datos sa gidaghanon sa isda, kabag-on sa corals, kinatibuk-ang impormasyon sa katilingban, ug mga kalihokan sa pagdumala sa kabaybayonan]

3 3 Site selected with community acceptance [Napili na ang lugar tukuran sa MPA nga gikauyonan sa katilingban]

Minutes of community meetings [naay consultation-and consultation naa sa CAO](Based on PCRA with public consultations) [Gamit ang proseso sa PCRA ug Ecogov

inubanan sa public consultations]0 4 Preliminary management plan drafted [Pagpanday sa pasiunang

management plan]Copy of draft plan [incorporated sa CRM-with separate budget-wala

213

specific sa MPA plan](Management plan should include policies, structures & responsibilities, strategies & programs, financial plan and M&E) [Ang management plan naglangkob ug mga polisiya, istructura ug katungdanan, mga kalihokan ug programa, plano sa panalapi ug Monitoring and Evaluation]

0 5 Management body membership tentatively determined [Ang mga miembro sa Management Body nailhan na pero dili pa hingpit]

Minutes of meetingsList of members [TWG naana-pero walay implementing unit](Management core group starting to conduct regular meetings with proper

documentation) [Ang pasiunang grupo nga magdumala nagsugod na sa pagpahigayon ug meetings ug dunay haom nga dokomentasyon]

1 6 Resolution and/or ordinance drafted [Ang resolusyon o ordinansa gipanday na]

Copy of resolutio

1 7 Education program raising awareness about MPA functions and benefits started [Pagsugod sa programa sa edukasyon aron mapalambo ang kahibalo bahin sa kaayuhan sa MPA]

Minutes of education activitiesAttendance sheets [barangay assemblies-attendance sheets naa sa barangays-consultations-March 17 mnga consultations-sites visits of City and barangay]

(Conducted a series of public education activities) [Pagpahigayon ug sunod-sunod nga nga paghatag ug pagtulon-an sa kadaghanan]

LEVEL 2 – MPA IS ESTABLISHED [Natukod na ang MPA]

1 8 Community acceptance gained and documented [Ang pag-dawat sa katilingban naangkon ug nakasulat]

Proceedings of public consultation [naay resolusyon gikan sa Taloto ug Ubujan gipasa sa City ug gipublish sa newspaper]

(Documented through public consultation documents, e.g. barangay resolution) ) [Nakasulat kini ug miagi ug public consultation, pananglit barangay resolution]

3 9 Ordinance passed and approved by the Municipal Council [And ordinansa gipasa ug gitugotan sa Municipal Council]

Copy of ordinance

0 10 Management plan adopted and legitimized by the LGU or PAMB [Ang Management plan gisagop ug gipaluyuhan ug balaod sa LGU]

Copy of management plan

(Adoption of management plan supported by resolution/ ordinance; plan went through community consultations with multi-sectoral stakeholders prior to approval/ legitimization) [Ang management plan gisagop pinaagi sa resolution o ordinansa; ang plano niagi ug community consultations uban ang lain-laing sector ayha pa ang pagtugot o supporta sa ordinansa]

0 11 Management body formed and functional [Ang Management body naumol na ug naglihok]

Minutes of meetings

(Composition of management group and committees identified; roles & responsibilities clarified and accepted; initial meetings conducted ) [Ang naglangkob sa management group ug mga comitiba nailhan na; ang papel ug katungdana klaro ug gidawat; pasiunang panagtagbo gipahigayon]

214

3 12 Budget for Year 1 implementation allocated [Pagtagana ug budget para sa unang tuig nga kalihokan]

Approved work and financial planFund appropriation document [4ooT City-ang Barangay wala] naa documento sa Rare

(LGU has committed a budget for the establishment and implementation of the MPA) [Ang LGU mi-comit ug budget para sa pagtukod ug pagpatuman sa MPA]

3 13 Enforcement activities initiated [Gisugdan na ang kalihokan sa pagpatuman sa MPA]

Mission orderPatrol logs [daily and night patrol-ispection sa mooring buoys](Regular guarding of the marine sanctuary initiated.)

1 14 IEC activities conducted [Ang mga kalihokan sa IEC gipahigayon na] Copy of stakeholder knowledge assessment reportActivity reports

(e.g. Dissemination of MPA rules & regulations; initial stakeholder knowledge assessment conducted) [Pagpakatap sa mga balaod ug regulasyon; pagpahigayon ug pagduki-duki ]

0 15 Boundaries delineated [Ang utlanan sa MPA klaro] PhotographsOcular survey(Anchor buoys, marker buoys and/or boundary marks installed) [Mga pataw para

sa pagangkla, pataw nga timailhan sa utlanan]0 16 Signboards/billboards posted [Nibarog na ang signboards ug billboards] Photographs

Ocular survey(Should show either map/zones, rules & regulations and/or other relevant details) [Ang mga signboards/billboards nagpakita up mapa, mga balaod ug uban pang mahinungdanong detalye]

0 17 MPA outpost or other structures constructed [Ang mga katukuran alang sa pagpasikad sa balaod natokod na]

PhotographsOcular survey

(Guardhouse and/or other MPA-related structures constructed) [Ang guardhouse o uban pang klase sa katukuran nga nga dunay kahilambigitaman sa MPA]

0 18 Biophysical monitoring includes local participation [Ang pagduki-duki sa mga buhilaman sa dagat gipahigayon uban ang local nga pag apil-apil]

Activity reports [until 2004-2009 by MBEMO-visual lang sa mga tawo-coordiated DENR and |BFAR](Locals were trained to do biophysical surveys using standard methods)

[Nabansay na ang mga local nga lumolopyo aron pagbuhat sa pagduki-duki sa mga buhilaman sa dagat gamit ang standard nga pamaagi]

LEVEL 3 – MPA IS ENFORCED [Ang MPA gipasikad/gipatuman] 0 19 Budget from LGU or from other sources allocated and is accessible for MPA

management [Ang budget sa LGU ug uban pang kakuhaan gitagana ug pwede makuha alang sa pagdumala sa MPA]

Copy of agreement

(There is a legal document by the LGU or an agreement with the private sector allocating budget for MPA management; financial reports being prepared and reported) [Adunay legal nga dokomento o kasabotan tali sa LGU ug pribadong sector aron pagtagana ug budget alang sa pagdumala sa MPA; and mga report sa financial nga aspeto]

215

0 20 Management body active and supported by legal instrument [Ang Management body actibo na ug gipaluyuhan ug balaod-legal nga documento]

Minutes of meetingsActivity reports

(Implements the management plan including enforcement and monitoring activities based on prepared annual operational plan; regularly convenes for meetings; provides a venue to manage conflict or resolve issues) [Ang Management plan gipatuman-naglangkob ug enforcement-pagpasikad sa balaod ug pagbalik tan-aw nga nagsumikad sa gihan-ay nga operational plan; paghimo ug panagtigom; pagtagana ug panahon aron totkan ug solbaron ang mga issues]

0 21 Collaborative patrolling and surveillance conducted by mandated enforcement group and local community volunteers, records maintained and open to everyone [Hiniusang pagbantay ug pagmatngon gipahigayon na inubanan sa enforcement group (PNP) ug local nga voluntaryo; mga record padayon gibuhat ug abre alang sa tanan]

Copy of legal instrumentPatrolling records

(Enforcement group supported by legal instrument; enforcement plan regularly prepared and being implemented, e.g. day/night shifts, by mandated enforcement group with assistance from local community volunteers) [Ang grupo nga tigpasikad sa balaod gipaluyohan ug balaod; dunay gisubay nga enforcement plan-adlaw gabii nga pagbantay]

0 22 MPA billboards, boundary markers/anchor buoys maintained [Mga billboards, timailhan sa mga utlanan-mga pataw]

Financial reportPhotographs

(Funds allocated for maintenance of enforcement support structures. May be part of municipal CRM budget) [Pondo gitagana alang sa mga katukuran kalabot sa enforcement]

0 23 Education program sustained public awareness and compliance Copy of IEC plan

(A long term IEC program is currently being implemented in support of enforcement and the general MPA objectives)

0 24 Regular participatory biophysical monitoring being conducted [Kanunay nga pagpahigayon ug pagduki-duki sa mga buhilaman sa dagat]

Survey reports

(Documented surveys conducted at least once annually using standard methods) [Ang resulta sa survey nakasulat; gibuhat ang survey matag tuig]

0 25 Fishing effectively stopped inside the sanctuary zone [Ang panagat sulod sa MPA nahunong na]

Patrolling reports

(No fishing-related violations/apprehensions reported inside MPA for the past year or if violations occurred these have been prevented or duly dealt with such that no overall adverse effect on the ecosystem has resulted) [Wala nay nabalita nga nanagat; mga kalapasan o nadakpan sulod sa MPA sa milabay nga tuig; kung dunay nisulod kini napugngan aron dili makahatag ug kadaot sa dagat]

216

0 26 Illegal and destructive fishing reduced outside of MPA [Ang illegal ug makadaot nga panagat mikunhod gawas sa MPA]

Patrolling reports

(Violations/apprehensions reported at least or at minimum within 5 km from the MPA boundaries have been reduced by 80% for the past year. This Implies that baseline violation reports have been estimated or gauged or at least based on the previous year) [Mikunhod (80%) na ang nabalita nga kalapasan sulod sa 5 ka kilometro gikan sa utlanan sa MPA]

LEVEL 4 – MPA IS SUSTAINED [Ang MPA nagmalungtaron] 0 27 MPA management plan and/or ordinance reviewed/updated in a

participatory process [Ang management plan ug ordinansa gibalikan ug tan-aw inubanan ang processo sa katilingban]

Copy of amendments

(Management plan and/or ordinance amended with the participation of various stakeholders) [Ang management plan ug ordinansa giamendahan uban ang pagapil-apil sa kadaghanan]

0 28 Budget from LGU or from other sources is being allocated and accessed for 2 or more consecutive years [Ang budget gikan sa LGU ug uban pang kakuhaan gitagana ug pwede magamit sulod sa duha ug daghang pang katuigan nga pagpatuman sa pagdumala]

Financial reportsCopy of contracts

(Financial reports being regularly prepared, audited and reported; proper procurement & contracting procedures are strictly being followed and transparent, e.g. reports are accessible and reported) [Ang mga report pinansiyal giandam sa kanunay; haom/sakto ug klaro nga pagpamalit ug gamit-nagsubay sa balaod; and reports makita sa tanan]

0 29 Management body capable to run the MPA independently [Ang Management body adunay kahanas sa pagpadagan sa pagdumala sa MPA]

Performance assessments

(Management body supervises/facilitates management activities [enforcement, budgeting & financial management, M&E, IEC, etc.] and coordinates activities with partners) [Ang management body mao ang nangulo sa mga kalihokan sa pagdumala ug pakiglambigit sa mga partners-pagpasikad sa balaod, pagdumala sa pondo]

0 30 Enforcement system fully operational [Ang pagpasikad sa balaod hingpit nga naglihok]

Enforcement reports

(Mandated enforcement group implementing regularly prepared enforcement plan; enforcement support structures maintained & patrolling activities sustained for 2 consecutive years or more; effective reporting system in place) [Ang grupo nga gitahasan sa balaod kanunay nag andam ug enforceement plan; giatiman ang mga katukuran (guardhouse ug pumpboat ug uban pa) ug namalahutayon

217

ang sulod sa duha ka tuig o daghan pang katuigan; epektibong nga pagbalita sa mga panghitabo]

0 31 MPA billboards, boundary markers/anchor buoys maintained [Mga billboards, timailhan sa mga utlanan-mga pataw]


(Site development structures and equipment maintained for 3 consecutive years or more)[Giatiman ang mga billboard ug mga buya]

0 32 Performance of management body regularly monitored and evaluated with community/stakeholder participation [Ang dagan sa pagdumala sa management body kanunay gisubay ug balikan ug tan-aw inubanan sa katilingban]

Performance assessment reports

(Performance monitoring program in place and conducted regularly for 2 consecutive years or more; reporting system for ordinary citizens to complain w/o fear of consequences available and widely known) [Natukod na ang programa sa pag monitor ug gibuhat kada duha ka tuig o daghan pang katuigan; adunay reporting system sa mga mulo sa katawhan ]

0 33 Annual participatory biophysical monitoring and timely feedback of results being implemented for 2 consecutive years or more, monitoring team accountable for reliability of results [after 2 years from establishment or the baseline reference up to the evaluation period] [Tinuig nga pagbalik tan-aw sa estado sa buhilaman sa dagat-kini gibuhat sulod sa duha ka tuig o daghang pang katuigan; ang monitoring team mao ang mupahigayon aron insakto and datos nga mareport ug makuha]

Monitoring reports

(Documented surveys using standard methods; reports available; results posted in billboards) [Nakasulat ang mga resulta sa survey gamit ang standard methods; and mga reports mabasa ug kini nakapatik sa mga billboards]

0 34 Socio-economic monitoring regularly conducted, monitoring team accountable for timely feedback and reliability of results

Monitoring reports

(Fisheries and/or socio-economic variables being regularly monitored by local monitoring team; data summaries/reports are available and easily accessible)

0 35 Environment friendly enterprise and/or fees collected as a sustainable financing strategy


(Environment-friendly products/goods sold to tourists, impose collection of user-fees, etc.)

3 36 Illegal and destructive activities stopped inside and within the vicinity of MPA Patrolling reports [ang illegal fishers shifted toother fishing grounds due to low catch-changed ]

(No violations/apprehensions reported inside and within 5 km of the MPA boundary or violations prevented or duly prosecuted and sanctioned for 2 consecutive years or more)

218

LEVEL 5 – MPA IS INSTITUTIONALIZED

0 37 Formal commitment from the Provincial Council giving MPA stronger political support

Commitment document

(Gives MPA institutional support to strengthen enforcement and collaboration)0 38 Management plan refined with stakeholder participation for adaptive

management

(Incorporates further refinements after gaining much experience and lessons to improve strategies)

0 39 MPA management plan including budgetary requirements incorporated in the LGU development plan

Copy of LGU long-term development plan

(MPA incorporated within the long-term LGU area-wide development plan) 0 40 Management body capacitated for fund sourcing Proposals

Letters to funding agencies(Can prepare and submit proposals to seek financial assistance from external sources e.g. funds sourced by local management bodies)

0 41 Effective coordination with appropriate national & local agencies on CRM/MPA policies and with other LGUs achieved; accountabilities and working relationships among collaborating institutions clearly defined and formalized

Letters to relevant agencies

(Coordination on implementation and resolution particularly of issues that transcend local boundaries including MPA networking with other MPAs etc.)

0 42 Evaluation of ecological and socio-economic impacts conducted and feedback mechanisms are in place

Assessment reports

(Assessment of resource status and long-term trends conducted; Analysis of change in local economy and long-term trends of user groups conducted; Reports of these studies have been completed and reported back to stakeholders and/or conference or symposia)

0 43 Performance M&E linked to an incentive system regularly conducted Assessment reports

(Recognition/awards are regularly being given to outstanding members, law enforcers, etc.; incentives can also include priority for granting of available loans or alternative livelihood opportunities; feedback mechanisms for the communities such as suggestion box, complaint desk in the LGU, village assembly, are available)

0 44 IEC program on MPAs sustained over the years Activity reports

(Information dissemination activities sustained according to long-term IEC program; citizens can conveniently access MPA-related info and LGU-disseminated materials such as minutes of meetings, leaflets, etc.)

0 45 Advanced IEC materials developed and disseminated with assistance from Sample of IEC materials

219

partners and/or private sector grants (e.g. video production) 3 46 MPA emphasizes on public education and is being used as a study tour site,

residents advocate for MPAsActivity reportsPhotographs [Gil and Jovenal and barangay Captains-survey enumerators]

(After much experience, members are ready to share learnings and impart knowledge; presence of identified group that conducts tours and capable of giving talks on MPAs; paper/s written on their success stories published)

0 47 Expansion strategies or enhancement programs initiated MapsDocuments supporting expansion(MPA coverage is expanded, e.g. from a sanctuary to a park; or scope of

conservation activities is heightened, e.g. coral reef restoration, culturing of clams, etc)

0 48 Support facilities constructed/added PhotographsOcular survey(E.g. tourism facilities, guardhouse expanded into an education/training center,

etc.)0 49 Revenues from enterprise and/or fees sustained and accounted for Financial reports

(Existing sustainable financing mechanisms are well-managed and well-documented; financial reports easily accessible)

MPA Level Year requirement met

Total Score per level

Thresholds

MPA level satisfied?Total threshold

score per level

Actual threshold

score

All threshold indicators satisfied?

1 - InitiatedAt least 6 monthsAt least 8 total cumulative scoreAll Level 1 thresholds met

9 6 6 YES YES

2- EstablishedAt least 1 yearAt least 24 Total Cumulative ScoreAll level 1 & 2 thresholds met

11 21 15 NO NO

220

3 - EnforcedAt least 3 yearsAt least 38 Total Cumulative ScoreAll level 1,2 & 3 thresholds met

0 36 15

4- SustainedAt least 5 yearsAt least 50 Total Cumulative ScoreAll level 1, 2, 3 & 4 thresholds met

3 45 18

5 - InstitutionalizedAt least 7 yearsAt least 66 Total Cumulative ScoreAll level `1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 thresholds met

3 57 21

Total cumulative score (out of

26

221

3.Letters of Support (Insert any letters of support for the campaign by key partners, politicians etc) (reference Lola p 169)

222

4.Threat Ranking

5.Factor Chain

223