1

The Final Document

The continuation of the first attempt

BackgroundThe years around 1990, an attempt was made to reach some form of new insight or knowledge of the phenomena space and time, and it led inter alia to the book The World without Time and Space (only in Swedish).

The book's starting point appears in the fantasy image that four figures of historical interest from different eras may meet and talk to each other - somewhere here on earth. This premise also includes that the four participants have taken note of what had been achieved in, for example, philosophy and science - from the time of the ancient Greeks - up to basically our days.

One of them is Plato - usually one say about him that his theory of forms is the basis of the entire Western thought construction, with the addition that all qualified thinking or philosophizing after Plato are merely marginal notes to his theory of forms.

Another participant in the book is Immanuel Kant. He is behind what is sometimes called the Copernican idea revolution of philosophy, within whose frameworks he, among other things, manifested that the thing-in-itself doesn´t exist and that all traditional knowledge is based on the inner mental forms of space and time.

The book's third historical figure is Albert Einstein, as in his luggage, among other things, has the special and general relativity theory, which today is considered to be a couple of the pillars of modern physics.

Diotima has also an important role in the book, even though it´s doubtful whether she even has existed in the material world. Plato has her on his conscience, she is in fact rewritten in a couple of his dialogues in which Socrates was the spokesman, and there Socrates tells that he has been taught about love - by a woman - Diotima - who purported to be Eros´ messenger here on earth.

The book was of course intended to deal primarily with the phenomena space and time, but it would also imply a small fragile love story between Immanuel Kant and Diotima. Initially, it was also planned that the participants in the working group would hang out and talk to each other - during a working week. It didn´t happen - their stay in the beautiful villa became, for various reasons, very short - two days.

2

The book The World without Time and Space (1997) also came to be called First attempt within the collective name: Attempts 1-7. It wasn´t until the Third attempt ended that the book also was named, First attempt. Attempt Two is written in Swedish - no English version is available. Almost the same is true of the Fourth attempt - which was carried out - but the original report document in Swedish was refused by the author. The other attempts are attached to the site; phenomenology.se: Attempt Three (2012), Five (2016), Six (2017), Seven (2018) and Clarifications (2018).

Continuation of the first attempt

With the completion of attempt Seven and Clarifications, the entire series of attempts returned to the First attempt again - and to the above-mentioned working group, which may once again be spoken.

Wednesday - third day of the working group; Plato, Immanuel Kant, Albert Einstein and Diotima. They have once again gathered around the table downstairs in the villa's library.Their host, who is also their client, lives in one of the adjacent annex buildings. He is also the person who from the beginning arranged the entire work conference, and Diotima has so far had personal separated meetings with him every day, - breakfast, lunch and evening time - within whose frames they communicated mutual information. Diotima has then told him what they have said or discussed in the working group and he has, for example, informed her of what have already been determined for the working group for the very near future. Diotima thus acts as a kind of communicator-moderator-curator for the working group and their common task.

Plato:We can say without any hesitation there´s been some changes in our ways of looking at the phenomena of space and time - therefore I allow myself - and I hope you also will do it - that today we start our conversations somewhere in that interface.In some paragraphs I have been influenced by Charles Sanders Peirce and the ideas he presented in, for example, his pragmatism and semiotics, as well as the ideas he expressed in the writings that appeared in connection with his death in 1914 - but as several of them could not be published in an acceptable way until the early 1990s.

Both space and time can therefore be seen as two forms of life that have developed in a process-like manner - and which in that case - under especially your oversight, Immanuel underwent what you call the Copernican idea revolution. There you succeeded in showing that especially the phenomena time and space can´t exist as independent elements in the material or empirical world.

3

On the other hand - if we consider the empirical world as our interpretation of it - then time, space, causality, etcetera can be described as the necessary internal pattern for this interpretation - and should our knowledge apparatus - as it normally is built - looked different - should also this inner pattern got a different look . It´s only in our inner mental conscious world that the spatial, temporal and causal relationships exist. In the other world - in the material world - where everything is considered to exist by itself, whether it´s experienced or not - these spatial, temporal and causal relationships can´t exist. It´s only our experiences from and in our inner world that are available for scientific research and which we can achieve genuine real knowledge of. Einstein interrupts: But, but, but, do you mean that we basically don´t have any knowledge of the outer world and its phenomena?  Plato: Yes! - I do mean that - and I do it because we are crippled by this intimated pattern - we can´t ignore or go beyond the inner forms that we have created for us in our attempts to reach basic knowledge of, for example, our external nature and its phenomena.  The traditional natural science is in general locked in these inner forms of space and time. Can´t we free ourselves from this locking to these internal forms of space, time, causality, etc. then we can´t say that we have any basic knowledge of the external physical phenomena at all.  Immanuel Kant interrupts (facing Plato):  We must - more in detail - define what we mean in these space and time respects, for otherwise Albert and Diotima are not with us on the train, right? All three, Plato, Albert and Diotima nodding affirmatively. Kant has also stared for a while at Albert Einstein and then he says with a certain stress in his voice:Your ideas about the relativity theoretical issues are fundamentally misleading! Albert Einstein's face gives off a clear protesting expression.But misunderstand me in the right way Albert, your thoughts about the relativity followed the linguistic tradition that was a notoriously driving force in the current epoch, i.e. as both space and time was used in the way you did it - which include that you defined both phenomena as primarily existing and measurable in the outer material world. In addition you consider time as curved in space, because then you could also utilize a math or geometry that you saw as possible to use in the context. But the basic problem with your procedure is: It was only anchored in a single way to consider and interpret in particular space and time - or more precisely - that they were external phenomena existing exclusively in the outer material world.    

4

 But in reality it´s completely different, because both space and time are all through inner mental phenomena. They can basically never, ever, leave their pure inner original states, and we will never perceive or understand the so-called outer space or neither - outer time – with help from our senses! Kant - breathing heavily a couple of times - and then say: I hold there until further notice! Plato and I have already discussed this issue with one another.  Kant looks at Einstein and Diotima - and he adds:

We have agreed that Plato will be the one who bring forward the summary of the final words in the context.Of course, I will contribute - when I consider it justified - and I hope even Albert and you dear Diotima want to deal with - the whole thing - in that way!  Kant (facing Plato): You are welcome! Plato: Thanks for that! Immediately I fall into the talk about your relativity-thoughts Albert, how it now relates with it, I can´t anything else than agree with Immanuel. It´s also in my perspective misleading, but not for the same reasons as Immanuel´s. What I then think about is why you were drawn into this at all. Was it not your ex. wife Mileva who gave you the first impulse to the idea as such? Albert Einstein looks doubtfully at Plato without saying anything. Can´t it even have behaved in this way that it was she who somehow brought the historical track to R J Boscovic and what we can call space-time continuum? Wasn´t there some links between Mileva´s family and Boscovic´s family both historical/mathematical and geographical/scientific/literary?  Albert Einstein: No! Mileva and I didn´t talked in that way with each other, but, but she was sometimes quite dismissive, you never got to know anything about her own old family - at least I can´t remember anything of what you indicate. Plato: R J Boscovic was inter alia philosopher, mathematician, astronomer and physicist and he was, for example, known for having been the first to introduce the field-idea, the field that later on both Michael Faraday and especially James Clerk Maxwell used for their purposes. You said Albert that you stood on Maxwell´s shoulders regarding for example, the electromagnetic phenomena - if Maxwell hadn´t existed wouldn´t your ideas of light have seen the light of the day, as you expressed it?     

5

 Albert nods to Plato, who continues:  Without any doubt it was RJ Boscovic who first introduced the very idea of the field and then also its math. Only that he created the idea of the field, and then also how he could use it mathematically, is at least outstanding, considering the historical period in which he was active in. You think so too, Albert?  Albert Einstein nods.  If you then point to the fact that Boscovic also presented a way of viewing and mathematically treating the so-called space-time continuum which almost were identical with your and Mileva's way of treating the same object, one can´t be anything else but very surprised.Albert!How was it possible that you and Mileva, in the context didn´t mention a single word about this heritage from Boscovic?  Albert Einstein:  It is incomprehensible - I can only agree with you - normally it should have been noticed - therefore it becomes a repetition from me: I didn´t know anything about these historical ties to Boscovic, but I also want to emphasize - when it concerning the mathematical applications Mileva was totally superior - her mathematical analysis was outstanding.  Diotima who has so far been rather retracted this day interrupts Albert Einstein with the words: You mean Albert, that Mileva devoted herself to play a dark game in front of you - she wanted to give the appearance of some kind of extreme originality for the relativity-idea as such - thus it wasn´t already described and presented by Boscovic? Einstein gives her no answer.  Plato continues:  I go back to Boscovic again and to his field-idea, we stop there for a while.By this field, Boscovic meant, I understand, a field that could occur like a thin layer of waves on a water surface that is exposed to a small wind. The field could inside itself harbor a variety of objects or phenomena , and as such, it also had the property to permeate all nearby exterior space infinitely diverse and thus it was also possible to convert or approximate it into a single field in all current spaces - even the entire universe 's cosmic space.    

6

It's basically the same idea of the field and how it then is used in various mathematical contexts - that´s coming back - all the way to about our modern time. We have your own field equations Albert, we have Maxwell´s, Paul Dirac´s, Peter Higgs´, Konstantin Meyl´s etcetera - in all these cases it´s basically just the same field that once Boscovic introduced. Plato breathes a few times and then exclaims:  But what did Boscovic mean with the field in his most original and primary intention - theoretically and in praxis?   In order to reach the tip of this issue I must have some help from the field-history.In 1831, Michael Faraday observed that magnetism, when it varied in different time intervals, could create electric currents, and some years earlier it was discovered the opposite, that electrical currents could exert force on magnets. Until about then had thus electricity and magnetism been regarded as two separate phenomena without relationships to each other. In 1864 when James Clerk Maxwell published his electromagnetic field theory, it was the first example of a theory - which includes two previous separate field theories - about electricity and magnetism - and instead provided the unified theory of electromagnetism. The story then spins on - with you Albert and Mileva when you used the speed of light in Maxwell's theory to reconcile the idea of space and time to a single entity that then, via Herman Minkowski - 1908 - came to be called space-time1915 the special theory of relativity was enlarged to a description of gravity, the general relativity, using a field that could describe the curved geometry of the four-dimensional space-time.  Einstein has during Plato's short speech just nodded affirming. Plato has obviously noticed this and then says:  However, you will not agree when I now claim: When you together with your ex-wife Mileva gave the external space and external time certain selected properties, primarily that the external space - at all - could accommodate external time, which in turn could be bent or folded into the external space - also made that you entered a bit within the holy ground. Or as the electro-genius Nikola Tesla expressed it: "To claim that space has properties - it´s like claiming that God has properties - he has not - only characteristics - and those we´ve created ourselves." To geometricize space and time, if I express myself as Tesla, is the same as playing in God's private garden, but that's your modern God as it´s all about, and he or she must of course cope with everything.    

7

 

But here is something hidden and it may probably have to do with the actual field idea, because if one look closer at it, one notice that even Boscovic juggled with the idea of some geometric solutions within the problem area he called the space-time continuum. Boscovic self-studies in that case told him that he probably could be accused of trying to act God if he should publish his former prospective fields-ideas. He was at that time in a life and work situation that made it impossible for him to deal with such accusations or attacks. His career plans simply put an end to him in this regard. Later in life when he again could be true to his own thoughts, ideas and scientific beliefs he also developed what can be said to be the highlight of his idea of the field.  Regarding Boscovic as a space/time-interpreter within the problem area of the field theory, I would first of all argue as follows: He looked at life as a stream/a process that was in an eternal movement in his space-time continuum.The primordial force behind this was, according to Boscovic, God.Boscovic was religious in the modern sense, he believed in a single supreme God , and that God with his primordial force was everywhere in what we call the outer space - which we in ourselves can´t experience - we can only think it or have an idea about it. In that case, Boscovic had similar thoughts as you, Immanuel, maybe he had, somehow, been influenced by your Copernican ideas, or was the situation the other way around, that you, somehow, had been affected by Boscovic's ideas.   However, one thing is certain - whether you Albert or your ex-wife Mileva was in any single way affected by R J Boscovic's or Immanuel Kant's ideas. Both of you were interested in playing God, if I express it in Nikola Tesla terms. Albert! The sarcasm ends there! I declare instead about the thoughts that R J Boscovic cherished mostly during the latest part of his life and concerning his original field idea: He perceived and saw as a kind of clear basic principle that the universe's total external space consists of a single common field that contains only the eternal life-stream of the primordial force of the space-time continuum.  Ok I see in your eyes Albert that you want to say something - but you must patiently wait - I intend to complete what Immanuel and I agreed to talk about this day. Therefore, I refer to the texts above - especially the attempts Six, Seven and Clarifications. The content of these texts moves roughly in an equivalent phenomenological spectrum as Boscovic's theoretical starting points for his field-idea and his ideas about the space-time-continuum did.      

8

 

But first of all a few words about the phenomena outer and inner space. To get some order in this relationship, with outer space I mean your external space Albert, because you believe that it exists out there in the material world even if we can´t experience it directly through our senses - shorty I call it Einstein-space. Inner mental space I call Kant-space, and then I mean space referring to the external respect, but its only resident is in the inner consciousness and from where it never can disappear, wherever that consciousness is, if it´s basically out there in the visible material world or in the inner invisible world.  All right! I will in a minute tell you what I mean in this particular space respect!  Just like you, Immanuel, I mean that it´s basically only one single space and it´s your inner space, or, as I said right now your Kant-space. When I've said that, I can´t say anything else, since that Kant-space exists in our consciousness it also presupposes all Einstein-space in the whole universe. Kant-space is in any case or in all cases always there in the first place.The Kant-space is in the name of the abductive logic the whole premise for the Einstein-space.  This Kant-space fills the outer Einstein-space in its entirety! Very concretely and directly!   According to you Diotima our host and friend looked at the outer space/the Einstein-space or the universe as it only was filled with Kant-space - and that was valid in the absolute slightest detail.  In the absolute slightest detail intend all the parts that the total Kant-space consists of - or which he described it metaphorically: The infinite number of small virtual bubbles that are connected to each other in clusters, where each bubble is made of its own bubble's surface and the surfaces of the surrounding bubbles. In each such bubble, there is an incessantly exchange of information between what is happening inside and with its own bubble and all the other bubbles. Since Kant-space, the universe´s only space is described in this detailed way, I want to introduce a substitute for this metaphor:I get it from our pioneer guys for electricity and magnetism, and what I have in mind is Faraday´s-cage/shield. The distinctive feature with Faraday´s-cage/shield was that it could resist against various forces/energies/streams/currents from outside, they bounced toward the cage protective cover.    

9

    I prefer to use the metaphor Faraday´s-cage/shield than the current bubble to give a picture of the inner Kant-space or for the universe´s absolute smallest. For the sake of clarity, all detailed content in Kant-space or in the entire universe is of course completely invisible to us humans. Not even if we use the most advanced microscopy technology, we would be able to discern any single Faraday-cage/shield - and by the way, not even the smallest part of an elementary particle e.g. a Higgs particle - but the future developments in this area, we know nothing about it, maybe something is on the lye there?

A view of the overall picture, which should thus appear, says that all of this is in a stillness. If we interpret all of this as existing in the inner Kant-space or in the outer Einstein-space - it doesn't move in any single way. It´s not until we observe the minimalistic Faraday-cage/shield as such that we discover what it carries in its innermost, namely the incoming and outgoing streams of movement, inside itself. In the Swedish language there is this word - inuti - which in a single very brief context describe what is happening in this case. The word is composed of the three prepositions in, ut and i - in-ut-i -; in English about; in, out and within. They can therefore generally be said to describe a movement in one and the same place in two opposite directions - with a sort of intermediate position of the two movements, where the two movements, fetch their breath again , or how you now want to perceive theirs intermediate position, because it can then be both a kind of retrieval and a kind of leaving - of something. What it now can be?  I soon return to just this specific phenomenon!  As you notice, I can now say that I, in my world of thoughts can find myself in the core function of Faraday´s-cage/shield or in the inner Kant-space and then even in the outer Einstein-space. Then of course, I must pay attention to the phenomenon - time - as it is the other side of OUR COIN.

Our friend and host has very meritoriously already evoked time to something absolute universal, thus made it accessible to our time and not as you Albert just unilaterally to the clock-time in the material world or which I also want to express it, to the external time that is only meaningful if we with holes and hair already swallowed the so-called curved time in your very one-sided Einstein-space. Albert Einstein tries to protest - but Plato ignores him and continues:

He resumed it all with what he named the most primordial memory.

 

10

  

One can then say, the infinite number of Faraday´s cages/shields that the universe and the Kant-space includes - in its entirety - consist of the most primordial memory.  We see this image of what we call the universe, as in detail consists of an infinite number of Faraday´s-cages/shields which are connected to each other via the surface of themselves and the surface of the adjacent Faraday cages/shields. Each cage/shield can communicate with all the other cages/shields, it´s what happens in each unit - in detail and overall.   Because this in infinity voluminous cage/shield-conglomerate in practice is our universe, but in a general sense, hasn´t been transmitted to the intrinsic universe, we must make ourselves to the obvious defenders of this image.    And why must we act in such advocate rolls? We shall do it first of all because we have to defend it as the scientifically most valid one!!  I once again want to return to R J Boscovic - the intellectual source - for example, for you Albert and your ex-wife Mileva and first of all for what previously was called the space-time-continuum and today is called space-time - and for the idea and theory of the field.  You simply fooled me when you claimed that you and Mileva didn`t pick the cherries from Boscovic´s cake. Without any doubt it was Boscovic´s idea/theory from the very beginning, then you pretended that it was your own - very - original - special - and general.   It was also true that Boscovic rejected his relativity thoughts and ideas. One may think that it only was for the reasons I already mentioned, but the truth is: He meant that they fought against nature and the pure and common reason.  When he later in life returned to them again he also linked them to his constantly current field-idea.What he at last concluded was the idea/thought of a universe consisting of one single common field, which covered the entire universe or all space, and what he then called the space-time-continuum spread its primordial force though all of this.         

11

If I translate this combined idea-theory from the later Boscovic to modern terminology, one can say that's Boscovic simply wanted to get rid of the habitual thinking that the outer space is existing. In clear text: The outer space lacks existence, according to Boscovic, but what´s there instead is the universal and common field, traditional space doesn´t exist.  What can you tell Diotima, you've talked to our host - did he mention if he had been affected by Boscovic on this issue?  Diotima: No, from the beginning he didn´t know anything about this Boscovic-idea - but now when he's been familiar with it - he means that it course should be considered as a part of the heritage from Boscovic.  Plato: Good! Albert! The summary can then only be: The outer space or your Einstein-space doesn´t exist! Obviously this will not immediately change the current scientific positions. The concepts space-time, space, the void or vacuum and time as they are used, for example, in modern physics, will many stubbornly cling onto. But as the ad hoc hypotheses accumulate and the various paradoxes only become more and more, they will eventually be forced to abandon their positions. Mark my words!  You look skeptical Albert! But let me remind you, that there are probably a few things that still are hidden in different ways. It may be so simple that you should look even further into Boscovic's hiding places.  Boscovic rejected the geometry for the pair of phenomena space and time, but perhaps he had something much easier in mind, that would revolutionize everything as modern physics so far reached when it comes to explain and describe certain phenomena, for example, those on the so-called elementary particle level.        Plato now makes a kind of dramatic pause in the old Athenian academic spirit.   

12

  Plato:  Well! I return to the specific phenomenon that I hinted some moments ago, and what´s going on in Faraday's-cages/shields.  Faraday's cages/shields consist of an infinite number of units connected in clusters, and the whole collection of units are as a singular object in a completely stillness. This object - or the universe - doesn´t move in any direction at all.  As being this object it remembers all that happens - right now - and within the object as such. It remembers everything that has happened and taken place and it also remembers everything that will happen.  In this futuristic perspective of what will happen, isn´t really true, as it simply can´t be determined in any such exact way. But since this object's content - is this infinite number of Faraday´s cages/shields which, in turn - if one include that each one of them carry an exact and original copy of the living entirety of the most primordial memory it means that the premise and the basis of what will happen is almost complete . This object; this infinite number of Faraday´s cages/shields permeates all phenomena in the universe - all purely physical as well as all purely mental phenomena and thus also all natural forces. Permeating something or someone completely means to be first in the life cycle. This permeation has no other precondition and foundation than the most primordial memory or Faraday´s cages/shields concerned in the context.  A distinctive feature of the Faraday-cage/shield and the most primordial memory as a single object, is their total absence of shape or structure. Their shape's or structures can purely phenomenological only be described in terms, words, concepts, metaphors etcetera where the content is of a genuine inner mental nature. The minimalistic movement; “in-ut-i”, that applies to each individual Faraday cage/shield, can, for example, be illustrated by a person who just is about to acquire a new life experience. Then one can say that a person comes loaded with the collected personal memories or experiences.  The person is then given the opportunity to stream - in - all the Faraday cages/shields included in this case, or all this person´s capacity of memories as these becomes possible to create. All these personal memories are processed immediately - in - all of the relevant cages/shields - then the result - streaming - out. Then again: in-out-within etcetera, etcetera.  

13

  This occurrences’ are instantaneously accomplished without any delay and in an equal manner in all the other cages/shields concerned. Describing this new life experience of an individual, one can say that there were a considerable number of minimalist movements in all the relevant Faraday cages/shields that needed to be done before this new life experience could be incorporated. Even if this person is walking on a road or path, she or he can incorporate this experience. One can say that the current cages/shields permeates her or him throughout, both physically and mentally - and do it throughout the whole walkabout.              We are continuously directly related to the most primordial memory. The human life would not be able to continue without this constant direct relationship with the most primordial memory. We humans, can´t be what we are if we miss, this incessant and total guidance to/with the most primordial memory.Therefore, there is no other possibility that the most primordial memory in its innermost/minimalistic form can be anything else than what have been exemplified by these Faraday-cages/shields. In other words, all the phenomena and the events of these phenomena, regardless of their traditional domicile, belong to the same world.  There is only one world and it includes everything.  But isn't it up to Zeus or your God to decide that? No! No! And again: No! And that´s because we first of all have to clean in front of our own door - to start with! We are the ones who speak and we talk to each other. Back and forth it becomes completely wrong, because we are also careless with our ideas, thoughts and theories or sometimes we simply walk away in them In this case, one might say, from the beginning we should have listened more carefully to R J Boscovic, when he suggested to replace God or the outer-space with something else "linguistically" more conceptive.  He contemplated almost all his life to suggest something else, where he also included yours and Mileva´s track, Albert, geometricizing space and time, and make them to one single unit. He saw it during a brief period as a possible solution, but unlike you and Mileva he rejected in the end the whole idea, in the end he saw it as irrational and in a total lack of reason and soul.  His actions were about the unwillingness to distance himself from the God he believed in. He searched in human language arsenal for the tools that in any way could make it possible to replace and at the same time unite the two concepts of space and time, as he saw were our two most basic, against something that instead could contribute to a more humane and resentment world, where common sense and the pure soul could have a larger scope.   

14

Immanuel Kant:  Thanks Plato! Your review was very interesting, even if it almost took the glory and honor of Albert. We can probably diminish some of your words a little, Plato. From own experience, I know that you easily lose yourself in the mathematical discourse when you try to solve problems you haven´t had contact with earlier. In such a process, it´s very easy to completely forget where you once started or how the premise exactly looked like in the very beginning. Albert! You might have thought that Maxwell and maybe even Faraday were the most important sources for you or your former wife's mathematics or for the relevant field-equations?  Einstein: Okay Immanuel, I have a pretty hard skin, and I consider that Plato's way of telling how he looks at this relativity story is both reasonable and fair. In a few hours when I have melted this I will try to deliver where I stand in this context of relativity. You will surely be surprised!

Immanuel Kant: It sounds both exciting and encouraging Albert, and then I can now allow myself a few words about what is also called Kant-space - or the universe - or as Plato vividly also called, an in infinity voluminous cage/shield-conglomerate.Last night when Plato and was talking, I had just studied some of our modern scholars within the area as these days are called cell biology or it´s also in a broader context is named physiology.   What I mainly devoted my interest in was DNA-biology. I gave my particular attention to the scientific area: Cell nucleus transmission of information via so-called magnetic waves in a conceived field theoretical context.  The researcher I then primarily want to refer to is Konstantin Meyl, and his hypothesis derives from something he calls the vortex-model and the magnetic mono-poles. Through these phenomena he believes he are able to observe the structures in the cell nucleus and also how to best explain and describe why two cells communicate with each other.  The magnetic scalar wave is then, according to Meyl, considered to be the genetic memory code which can be stored in the base pair of the gene, which in turn generates a chemical structure modeling by electromagnetic waves, so that it thereby can transmit information from one cell to another.       

15

At the receiving end of the receiving cell, the reverse process occurs, and the transported information is converted back into a chemical structure. The necessary energy required to drive this chemically dual process is provided by the magnetic scalar wave itself. According to Meyl, a wave always consists of an electromagnetic part and a pure magnetic scalar part. Sometimes the electromagnetic part preponderate, sometimes the other way around. Magnetic scalar waves can be manufactured by rolling two cables of e.g. copper around a magnetic coil. When one then apply electricity through one cable in one direction and also puts electricity in the other cable in the opposite direction, they create electromagnetic waves which then emerge each other and the pure magnetic scalar wave arises.  Our DNA is an antenna that can transmit magnetic scalar waves as a transmitter and which also functions as a receiver and thus also can receive magnetic scalar waves. Our DNA which is the cell´s power plant - the mitochondrial - has the shape of such a super-coil.The super-coil´s DNA looks much like the coil above, and it can therefore generate magnetic scalar waves. Most cells in our body have thousands of such coils that produce magnetic scalar waves in the cell and body.  Our body has no antennas for electromagnetic waves, it´s the magnetic scalar waves which biologically is the very most relevant. Another such device of a coil is in our blood system. The constant blood flow through the arterial system is matched by such a coil. The blood flow from the venous system , which conveniently circuits in the opposite direction, is also based in another comparable coil. The blood circulation through the body forms then a process in and around the concerned coils. The whole body can thus - wirelessly - send information and energy to every cell and vice versa. That´s done absolutely instantaneous because the body uses magnetic scalar waves as its main tool. Therefore, images in our brain can be built up extremely fast and this is done via a parallel technology - nor analogical or digital.  The left and right brain halves send out different scalar waves and thus create a so-called scalar interferometer . Thoughts and ideas are conveyed through magnetic scalar waves . Therefore they can immediately without any delay, according to the clock-time, and with almost no energy at all unhindered reach out to any remote location at all.      Diotima, Plato, Immanuel Kant and Albert Einstein are now taking a short break for some necessary duties.    

16

    After the break      Immanuel Kant:  Charles Sanders Peirce with his abductive logic and semiotic precision urges us, for example this - if we strictly follow the logic of the immediate proximity principle and that there are a number of very relevant signs pointing in the same direction within one and the same field:  Make the space of the universe through an allegorical transfer from Constantine Meyls field theoretical considerations in the magnetic scalar waves signs, to something exact equivalent and comparable with the human body and our mental phenomena! In other words: Basically, there exists only one natural force and it can be exemplified and symbolized by the magnetic scalar wave motion occurring – “inuti” - each Faraday cage/shield and in the infinitely extensive conglomerate of these Faraday cages/shields, which permeates all phenomena, both the physical and the mental, in the outer space of the universe!  The situation isn´t that the space of the universe´s undergoes some form of transformation to the human figure, either physically or mentally.  What everything is about in the universe basically comprises and expresses these simple goals:  One, Life - 2, Human beings - 3, Language - and all that in an extended meaning belongs to these three areas of phenomena.  Thus, it´s also quite obvious that the most distinctive feature of the outer space of the universe is its only quality to generate the eternal life stream of the most primordial memory - and that we in every moment also should embrace it as something absolutely crucial for the future of humanity.          Albert Einstein:

17

 Facing the three of you, I would also like to tell you that the disappearance of space is something I already discussed with Kurt Gödel at the end of my years at Princeton University.  Kurt Gödel quite firmly meant that space didn´t exist - neither in itself - or as such, and that I therefore should work on my theories of relativity so that they better responded to the reality - finally I realized that he meant this very seriously and through his logical motives.

But from the beginning I didn't really take him seriously, I actually thought he was joking and my standard argument on those occasions I repeated almost as a kind of mantra:

Approximately like this: Will space have its place and existence in life, we must get it from some place, and we can only do it from the place where the things, the bodies, the materials etcetera are. Thus both the space within, for example, a tree's mass, and the void immediately outside the tree.

In other words if space exist, there must be space for it - humans simply can´t imagine life without space.  You must surely be able to imagine that space doesn´t exist at least as a mere thought experiment, he said extremely stubborn and almost aggressively at one occasion - you know what it is? Thus a thought experiment?At that point I must had said something completely incomprehensible, for his words to me at that time sounded roughly the way you presented space, that is, as a genuine replacement phenomenon - yes, yes , I want to remember that his argument ended up somewhere in that sphere.               But! I still want to claim: My old main argument is still viable. But it has no bearing whatsoever in the purely phenomenological context, that I´m now very aware of. When I nowadays realize that my space-idea, in whatever form I presented it in the context of the theory of relativity, is entirely misleading, I can only agree with both you Plato and you Immanuel what you´ve said and mentioned about my and also Mileva's ideas of relativity. About time as a phenomenon, I can only add, it´s excellent that it completely is linked to the phenomenon of memory in a kind of total and fundamental universal meaning, and disconnected from our perceived clock-time. It will be interesting to follow how the scientists and theorists in modern physic will act or behave in the future.  They may not do anything at all, for what it's about affects every single one of the phenomena that we want to conform into our two worlds, the outer physical and the inner mental, and any ambitions of that kind hasn´t any single working physicist today. And corresponding views can one have about the representatives of scientific areas such as psychology, biology and physiology.