0521856493.cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.2006...
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpra 1/436
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/http://www.cambridge.org/9780521856492 -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpra 2/436
This page intentionally left blank
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpra 3/436
F R E E D O M O F R E L I G I O N
The scale and variety of acts of religious intolerance evident in so many
countries today are of enormous contemporary concern. This timely
study attempts a thorough and systematic treatment of both Universaland European practice side by side. The standards applicable to freedom
of religion are subjected to a detailed critique, and their development
and implementation within the UN is distinguished from that within
Strasbourg, in order to discern trends and obstacles to their advance-
ment and to highlight the rationale for any apparent departures between
the two systems. This dual focus also demonstrates the acute need for the
European Court to heed the warnings from various patterns of violation
throughout the world illustrated by the Human Rights Committee and
the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief.
P A U L M . T A Y L O R is a Barrister (Lincolns Inn).
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpra 4/436
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpra 5/436
F R E E D O M O F R E L I G I O NUN and European Human Rights Law and Practice
P A U L M . T A Y L O R
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpra 6/436
camde uvest pess
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, So Paulo
Cambridge University PressThe Edinburgh Building, Cambridge c22u, UK
First published in print format
s-13 978-0-521-85649-2
s-13 978-0-521-67246-7
s-13 978-0-511-13549-1
Paul M. Taylor 2005
2005
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521856492
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision ofrelevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place
without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
s-10 0-511-13549-1
s-10 0-521-85649-3
s-10 0-521-67246-5
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy ofusfor external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does notguarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York
www.cambridge.org
hardback
paperback
paperback
eBook (EBL)eBook (EBL)
hardback
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridge.org/9780521856492http://www.cambridge.org/http://www.cambridgeebook.com/http://www.cambridge.org/9780521856492http://www.cambridge.org/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpra 7/436
CONTENTS
Forewordby David Harris page ix
Preface xi
Table of cases, applications, and communications xiii
Table of treaties, declarations, and other international
instruments xxiv
List of abbreviations xxvii
1 Introduction 1Overview 1
Interrelation between the UN and European systems 7
The institutions and their contribution to standard-setting 9
The Human Rights Committee 10
The Role of the Special Rapporteur 15
The European Convention treaty organs 16
Chapter structure 19
2 Freedom of religious choice 24
Introduction 24
Freedom to change or maintain religion 27
Pressure to maintain a religion or belief 43
Origin of the freedom from coercion 43
Interpretation of the freedom from coercion 45
Apostasy 50
Summary 53
Pressure to change religion 54
Introduction 54
Missionary activity, imperialist ambitions, colonialism and war 55
v
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpra 8/436
Social concern and inducements 57
Proselytism 64
Grounds of opposition to proselytism 64
Rights and freedoms of others 70
Coercion 73
Hate speech 77
Blasphemy, disparagement and gratuitous offence 84
Conclusion 111
3 The scope of the forum internum beyond religious
choice 115Introduction 115
Direct protection for the forum internum 120
Decisions based on justified limitation on manifestation 121
Decisions based on available alternatives 136
Exemption ruling out coercion 136
Employment 138
Decisions based on provision for interference in therelevant Convention 147
Military service 148
Taxation and social security 153
Recognition that coercion does not constitute
manifestation 156
Summary 159
Indirect protection for the forum internum 160The rights and freedoms of others as a ground of limitation 161
Education 165
Respect for parental convictions based on indoctrination 166
Alternative approaches: manifestation and
coercion to act contrary to ones beliefs 175
Summary 182
The use of anti-discrimination measures to protectthe forum internum 182
Differential treatment 187
Reasonable and objective criteria 192
Summary 198
Conclusion 198
vi C O N T E N T S
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpra 9/436
4 The right to manifest religious belief and applicable
limitations 203
Introduction 203
Beliefs and their manifestation 203
Protected beliefs 204
Nexus between religion or belief and its manifestation 210
Determination of whether there has been an interference 222
The scope of recognised manifestations of religion or belief 235
To worship or assemble in connection with a religion
or belief, and to establish and maintain places for
these purposes 237
Worship or assemble 237
Establish and maintain places of worship and assembly 242
To establish and maintain appropriate charitable
or humanitarian institutions 246
To make, acquire and use to an adequate extent the
necessary articles and materials related to the rites or customs
of a religion or belief 250To write, issue and disseminate relevant publications
in these areas 259
To teach a religion or belief in places suitable for these
purposes 263
To solicit and receive voluntary financial and other
contributions from individuals and institutions 271
To train, appoint, elect or designate by succession
appropriate leaders called for by the requirements and
standards of any religion or belief 272
To observe days of rest and to celebrate holidays
and ceremonies in accordance with the precepts of ones
religion or belief 278
To establish and maintain communications with
individuals and communities in matters of religion or belief
at the national and international levels 287Summary 290
Permissible limitations on the right to manifestation 292
Introduction 292
Prescribed by law 293
Legitimate aim 301
C O N T E N T S vii
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 10/436
Necessary (in a democratic society) 305
Grounds of limitation 321
Public interest grounds of limitation 321
Public health and safety 321
Order 323
National security 325
Protection of morals 327
Fundamental rights and freedoms of others 328
Conclusion 333
5 Conclusion 339The myth surrounding the nature of coercion to change
religion or belief 339
Developing recognition of issues of conscience 342
The widening of State discretion in European jurisprudence 343
The range of manifestations of religion or belief 347
Meeting future challenges 348
Overview 350
Annexes 352
Annex 1: Universal Declaration of Human Rights 352
Annex 2: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 358
Annex 3: Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms
of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief 368
Annex 4: Convention for the Protection of Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms 372
Annex 5: Text of General Comment No. 22 378
Bibliography 383
Index 398
viii C O N T E N T S
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 11/436
FOREWORD
This study of the United Nations and European international humanrights law guaranteeing freedom of religion addresses issues of greatcontemporary concern. There are many places in the world where thefollowers of a particular religion may not lawfully worship or practisetheir religion in their daily lives. Apostacy and proselytism may becriminal acts, as may artistic speech that causes offence to religiousfeelings. Religious intolerance continues to fuel a high proportion ofthe situations of armed conflict around the world, thus being the see-mingly intractable cause of so much human suffering. Since 9/11,
incitement to religious hatred has increased in significance, withMuslims being the targets of general blame. Religion is as the heart ofthe debate about multiculturalism, exemplified by the heated contro-versy in France about the wearing of headscarves by Muslim women.The relationship between Church and State remains a contentious issuein some other societies. In a watershed and contentious judgment inRefah Partisi v. Turkey, the European Court of Human Right has ruledthat a state legal order that is founded on Shariah Law is not consistentwith democracy in Europe, so that the banning of a political party thatseeks to introduce such an order is not in breach of the guarantee of theright to freedom of association in the European Convention on HumanRights. And the return to strict Christian religious values in the UnitedStates has raised moral questions and issues of separation of Church andState for the courts.
This book is likely to become the place of first recourse on the
international human rights law on freedom of religion that governthese and other situations and issues. It offers a comprehensive analysisand evaluation of the relevant international law standards that haveevolved within the United Nations and the Council of Europe. Thebook is distinctive in its reliance upon both the sometimes differing jurisprudence and practice of the United Nations and European humanrights systems. At the United Nations level, what is of great value is the
ix
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 12/436
authors use not only of the practice of the Human Rights Committee,but also of the reports of the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom ofReligion or Belief. These reports are a depressingly revealing mine of
information about the large extent and different forms of the ongoingviolations of freedom of religion perpetrated or tolerated by Statesaround the world.
D A V I D H A R R I S
Professor Emeritus and Co-Director of theHuman Rights Law Centre,
School of Law,University of Nottingham
April 2005
x F O R E W O R D
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 13/436
PREFACE
The escalating religious intolerance of recent years, both through Stateviolation and by non-State entities, is most conspicuous in events followingthe collapse of the former Soviet Union, in religious conflict in many partsof the world and, of course, in the attacks of 11 September 2001. This hascaused speculation whether the international instruments which weredeveloped more than half a century ago, and those which followed butwere shaped by those instruments, are sufficient to meet present andforeseeable demands. The array of religious violations visible in so manycountries today could not have been anticipated by the drafters of the core
freedom of religion Articles in the foundational instruments, namely theUniversal Declaration on Human Rights and the European Convention.The development of comparable provisions in later instruments, such asthe International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the UnitedNations Declaration on the Elimination of all Forms of Intolerance and ofDiscrimination based on Religion or Belief (the 1981 Declaration), sug-gests that the issues which fashioned the text of those later provisions didnot depart significantly from those faced by the original drafters, exceptperhaps in the intensity with which they were debated.
Among recent patterns of violation, particularly in countries of the formerSoviet Union, are measures such as prohibitive registration formalities andbans on proselytism aimed at the protection of a traditional State religion orthe preservation of national identity in reaction to the influx of new religiousmovements. Many other countries have recently adopted preventive policiesagainst so-called sects as a result of exaggerated fears of their activities. The
xenophobia and discrimination directed at Muslims following September 11has been far more widespread and anxieties about extremism have, forexample, led various countries to react more unfavourably than ever towardsMuslim dress. Hostility towards Muslims has added impetus to moves whichhad already begun in certain countries for legislation designed to prohibitreligious vilification or religious hatred. It remains to be seen whether thiswill be at the expense of religious practice such as teaching and proselytism.
xi
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 14/436
One other development of recent years has been the emergence of politicalparties with an overtly religious agenda, the most radical advocating theintroduction of a system of government based on religious law.
It is therefore timely to reflect on whether existing instruments arecapable of meeting immediate expectations and, as we approach the25th anniversary of the 1981 Declaration, to consider in particular thecontribution to the development of current standards made by thatDeclaration and by the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion orbelief appointed to examine incidents and governmental action incon-sistent with the Declaration. The 1981 Declaration is of unique signifi-cance in the development of the freedom of religion since it was the first,and remains the only, United Nations instrument dedicated solely tothat freedom. This work pays tribute to the specialist role of the SpecialRapporteur in providing a wealth of material on recurring patterns ofviolation worldwide and in serving to uncover contemporary sources ofintolerance and obstacles to the promotion of international obligations.
The purpose of this book is to provide a detailed survey of the elementsof the freedom of thought, conscience and religion as developed within
both the United Nations and European systems and to offer an analysis oftrends at a time when the freedom faces a number of important challenges.It provides a critique of United Nations and European practice in order toidentify and explain apparent departures between the two systems, to helpto discern obstacles to the advancement of standards and to guage the levelof recognition given to different aspects of the freedom. The aim is toenable an immediate appreciation of the United Nations or Europeansystem for those familiar with only one, and to provide coverage of thelaw and practice of both United Nations and European institutions forthose familiar with neither system.
I would like to acknowledge and thank Professor David Harris, whohas been extremely generous in his support for this work and whoseassistance I value enormously. I would also like to thank, among manyothers who have helped in its preparation, the librarians at CambridgeUniversitys Squire Law Library for their patient assistance with many
queries and the kind provision of facilities beyond all expectation. I amalso greatly indebted to Wolfson College Cambridge for a VisitingFellowship that offered a stimulating environment for the completionof this work, to Finola OSullivan of Cambridge University Press whothroughout has never been anything but extremely helpful, and to theanonymous referees appointed by Cambridge University Press for theirvery useful recommendations for improvement of the text.
xii P R E F A C E
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 15/436
TABLE OF CASES, APPLICATIONS, ANDCOMMUNICATIONS
The European Court of Human RightsAbdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. United Kingdom (Ser. A) No. 94
(1985) ECtHR 186Agga v. Greece (App. Nos 50776/99 and 52912/99), Judgment of
7 October 2002 276Ahmet Sadikv. Greece (1997) 24 EHRR323 270Barthold v. Germany (Ser. A) No. 90 (1985) ECtHR 270
Baskaya and Okcuoglu v. Turkey (2001) 31 EHRR292 207Beard v. United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 442 243Buckleyv. United Kingdom (1997) 23 EHRR101 242Buscarini and others v. San Marino (2000) 30(2) EHRR208 129, 130,
159, 199, 302, 345Case relating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in
education in Belgium (the Belgian linguistics case) (Ser. A) No. 6(1968) ECtHR 167, 183, 185
Campbell and Cosans v. United Kingdom (Ser. A) No. 48 (1982)ECtHR 128, 166, 173
Canea Catholic Church v. Greece (1999) 27 EHRR521 226Casimiro Martins v. Luxembourg (App. No. 44888/98, unreported,
decision of27 April 1999) 173Chaare Shalom Ve Tsedekv. France (App. No. 27417/95), Judgment of
11 July2000 21819, 224, 226, 258, 322
Chapman v. United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR399 242Chassagnou and others v. France (2000) 29 EHRR615 186Dahlab v. Switzerland (App. No. 42393/98), Judgment of15 February
2001 172, 254, 304, 331, 334, 337Dudgeon v. United Kingdom (Ser. A) No. 45 (1982) ECtHR 310Efstratiou v. Greece (1997) 24 EHRR298 117, 173Engel v. The Netherlands (Ser. A) No. 22 (1976) ECtHR 142
xiii
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 16/436
Eriksson v. Sweden (Ser. A) No. 156 (1989) ECtHR 167Freedom and Democracy Party (OZDEP) v. Turkey (2001)
31 EHRR674 227
Groppera Radio AG and others v. Switzerland (Ser. A) No. 173A(1990) ECtHR 162
Handyside v. United Kingdom (Ser. A) No. 24 (1976) ECtHR 94,185, 308
Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria (2002) 34(6) EHRR1339 228,2735, 277, 294, 296, 299, 311, 335, 348, 350
Hoffmann v. Austria (Ser. A) No. 255C (1993) ECtHR 269Holy Monasteries v. Greece (Ser. A) No. 301 (1995) ECtHR 230, 252Incal v. Turkey (2000) 29 EHRR449 207Informationsverein Lentia and others v. Austria (Ser. A) No. 276,
Judgment of24 November 1993 92Inze v. Austria (Ser. A) No. 126 (1988) ECtHR 186Jersild v. Denmark (Ser. A) No. 289 (1995) ECtHR 80Johnston v. Ireland (Ser. A) No. 112 (1987) ECtHR 283Kalac v. Turkey (1999) 27 EHRR552 1434, 217, 318, 345
Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark (the Danish sexeducation case) (Ser. A) No. 23 (1976) ECtHR 116, 166, 167,168, 170, 171, 172, 201
Kokkinakis v. Greece (Ser. A) No. 260A (1993) ECtHR 39, 50,6770, 73, 86, 90, 96, 101, 112, 129, 163, 164, 168, 208, 217,225, 264, 267, 273, 294, 298, 302, 308, 330, 335, 340, 349
Larissis and others v. Greece (Ser. A) No. 65 (1998V) ECtHR363 66, 70, 98, 112, 171, 294, 309, 334, 341
Lotter and Lotter v. Bulgaria (App. No. 39015/97), Judgment of19 May 2004 289
McGuinness v. United Kingdom (App. No. 39511/98 unreported,decision of8 June, 1999) 130
Maestri v. Italy (App. No. 42393/98), Judgment of17 February2004 296, 335
Malone v. United Kingdom (Ser. A) No. 82 (1984) ECtHR 294
Manoussakis and others v. Greece (1997) 23 EHRR387 50, 503,126, 233, 242, 299, 302, 303, 310, 324, 328, 335, 349
Marckxv. Belgium (Ser. A) No. 31 (1979) ECtHR 186Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and others v. Moldova (2002)
35 EHRR306 2224, 225, 230, 234, 240, 245, 246, 247, 271,2727, 291, 299, 303, 308, 312, 313, 324, 335, 337, 338, 350
xiv T A B L E O F C A S E S
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 17/436
Muller v. Switzerland (Ser. A) No. 133 (1988) ECtHR 978Murphyv. Ireland (App. No. 44179/98) (2004) 38 EHRR
212 89, 98, 11314, 163, 304, 309, 325
Olsson v. Sweden (Ser. A) No. 130 (1988) ECtHR 294Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria (Ser. A) No. 295A (1994) ECtHR
857, 99, 11314, 162, 164, 343Palau-Martinez v. France (App. No. 64927/01), Judgment of16
December 2003 269Plattform Arzte fur das Leben v. Austria (Ser. A) No. 139 (1988) ECtHRPrettyv. United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR1 207, 208, 216Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and others v. Turkey (2003) 37
EHRR1 229, 314, 335Riera Blume and others v. Spain (2000) 30 EHRR632 332Serifv. Greece (1999) 31 EHRR561 164, 218, 2756, 277, 312,
325, 335, 336, 349Sidiropoulos v. Greece (1999) 27 EHRR633 229, 302, 304Socialist Party and others v. Turkey (1999) 27 EHRR51 317Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria
(1998) 26 EHRR, CD 103 302The Sunday Times Case (Ser. A) No. 30 (1979) ECtHR 294The Sunday Times v. United Kingdom (No. 2) (1992) 14 EHRR229 308Supreme Holy Council of the Muslim Communityv. Bulgaria (App. No.
39023/97), Judgment of16 December 2004Thlimmenos v. Greece (2001) 31 EHRR411 18990, 201, 295,
336, 348Tsirlis and Kouloumpas v. Greece (1998) 25 EHRR198 150, 193United Christian Broadcasters Ltd v. United Kingdom (App. No.
44802), Judgment of7 November 2000 92United Communist Party of Turkey and others v. Turkey (1998) 26 EHRR
121 304, 313, 314Vatan v. Russia (App. No. 47978/99), Judgment of7 October 2004 81VgT Verein Gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland (App. No. 24699/94),
Judgment of28 June 2001 92, 923
Valsamis v. Greece (1997) 24 EHRR294 117, 172, 1756, 282Vogt v. Germany (Ser. A) No. 323A (1995) ECtHR 99Wingrove v. United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR1 8792, 967,
113, 328Young, James and Webster v. United Kingdom (Ser. A) No. 44 (1981)
ECtHR 174
T A B L E O F C A S E S xv
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 18/436
The European Commission of Human Rights
Angeleni v. Sweden, App. No. 10491/83 (1986) 51 D&R 41 128,
166, 192, 208Arrowsmith v. United Kingdom, App. No. 7050/75 (1980) 19
D&R 5 123, 128, 12930, 174, 207, 210Autio v. Finland, App. No. 17086/90 (1991) 72 D&R 245 193B. and D. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 9303/81 (1986) 49 D&R
44 167
Bernard and others v. Luxembourg, App. No. 17187/90 (1993)75 D&R 57 174, 192
C. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 10358/83 (1983) 37 D&R142 124,126, 154, 157, 214, 215, 247, 252
Chappell, A.R.M. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 12587/86 (1987)53 D&R 241 240, 331, 337
Childs v. United Kingdom, App. No. 9813/82, decision of1 March1983 unpublished, Council of Europe Digest of StrasbourgCase-Law relating to the European Convention on Human Rights,
Section 9.2.1.1, p. 1 239, 324Choudhuryv. United Kingdom, App. No. 17439/90 (1991)
12 HRLJ 172 85Christians against Racism and Fascism v. United Kingdom, App. No.
8440/78 (1980) 21 D&R138 323, 336Church of Scientology and 128 of its members v. Sweden, App. No.
8282/78 (1980) 21 D&R109 100Church of X. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 3798/68 (1968) 29
CD 70 289C. J., J. J. & E. J. v. Poland, App. No. 23380/94 84A (1996) D&R46
176, 346Conscientious objectors v. Denmark, App. No. 7565/76 (1978)
9 D&R 117 148D. v. France, App. No. 10180/82 (1983) 35 D&R 199 283Darbyv. Sweden (Ser. A) No. 187 (1990) ECtHR, annex to the decision
of the Court 39, 41, 116, 127, 156, 160, 199, 342E. & G. R. v. Austria, App. No. 9781/82 (1984) 37 D&R42 40, 137East African Asians cases, App. No. 4403/70 etc (1981) EHRR76, 36
CD, 92 165, 186Gay News Ltd and Lemon v. United Kingdom, App. No. 8710/79
(1982) 5 EHRR123 84, 96, 99
xvi T A B L E O F C A S E S
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 19/436
Glimmerveen and Hagenbeekv. The Netherlands, App. No. 8348/78and 8406/78 (1979) 18 D&R 187 80
Gottesmann v. Switzerland, App. No. 101616/83 (1984) 40 D&R
284 3941, 341Grandrath v. Germany, App. No. 2299/64, 10 YBECHR (1967)
626 149, 193Gudmundsson v. Iceland, App. No. 511/59, 3 Yearbook (1960) 394 154Hazar and Acikv. Turkey, App. Nos. 16311/90, 16312/90 and 16313/
90 (1992) 73 D&R 111 (settlement); (1991) 72 D&R 200(admissibility) 128, 207, 208
Iglesia Bautista El Salvador and Ortega Moratilla v. Spain, App. No.17522/90 (1992) 72 D&R 256
ISCON and others v. United Kingdom, App. No. 20490/92 (1994) 90D&R 90 242, 243
Johansen v. Norway, App. No. 10600/83 (1985) 44 D&R 155 148Karaduman v. Turkey, App. No. 16278/90 (1993) 74 D&R 93 144,
215, 2534, 318, 337, 349Karlsson v. Sweden, App. No. 12356/86 (1988) 57 D&R172 1401
Khan v. United Kingdom, App. No. 11579/85 (1986) 48 D&R253 213, 283
Knudsen v. Norway, App. No. 11045/84 (1985) 42 D&R247 129,13941, 212, 220
Kommunistische Partei Deutschland v. Germany, App. No. 250/57,1 Yearbook (19557) 222 165
Konttinen v. Finland, App. No. 24949/94 (1996) 87 D&R 68 158,1889
Kuhnen v. Germany, App. No. 12194/86 (1988) 56 D&R 205Kustannus Oy Vapaa Ajattelija AB and others v. Finland, App. No.
20471/92, 85A (1996) D&R29 226Logan v. United Kingdom, App. No. 24875/94 (1996) 22 EHRR, CD
178 241
Marais v. France, App. No. 31159/96 (1996) 86 D&R 184 81N. v. Sweden, App. No. 10410/83 (1985) 40 D&R 203 148, 193
Omkarananda and the Divine Light Zentrum v. United Kingdom, App.No. 8188/77 (1981) 25 D&R 105 58, 273
Ortega Moratilla v. Spain, App. No. 17522/90 (1992) 72 D&R256 157Plattform Arzte fur das Leben v. Austria, App. No. 10126/82 (1985)
44 D&R 65 1001, 128, 208Raninen v. Finland, App. No. 20972/92, 84A (1996) D&R17 193
T A B L E O F C A S E S xvii
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 20/436
Reformed Church of X. v. The Netherlands, App. No. 1497/62, 5Yearbook (1962) 286 1367, 1545
Scientology Kirche Deutschland v. Germany, App. No. 34614/96, 89A
(1997) D&R163Seven Individuals v. Sweden, App. No. 8811/79 (1982) 29 D&R
104 167, 268Stedman v. United Kingdom, App. No. 29107/95, 89A (1997) D&R
104 144, 158, 189, 241, 282Suter v. Switzerland, App. No. 11595/85 (1986) 51 D&R 160 193T. v. Belgium, App. No. 9777/82 (1983) 34 D&R 158 81V. v. The Netherlands, App. No. 10678/83 (1984) 39 D&R
267 126, 215Van den Dungen v. The Netherlands, App. No. 22838/93 (1995) 80
D&R 147 99100, 160, 188Van de Heijden v. The Netherlands, App. No. 11002/84 (1985) 41
D&R 264Verein Kontakt-Information-Therapie and Hagen v. Austria, App. No.
11921/86 (1988) 57 D&R 81
W. & D.M. and M. and H.I. v. United Kingdom, App. Nos. 10228/82and 10229/82 (joined) (1984) 37 D&R 96 171
X. v. Austria, App. No. 1747/62 (1963) 13 CD 42 326X. v. Austria, App. No. 1753/63 8 Yearbook (1965) 174 256, 324X. v. Austria, App. No. 5591/72 (1973) CD 43 161X. v. Austria, App. No. 8652/79 (1981) 26 D&R 89 228X. v. Denmark, App. No. 7374/76 (1976) 5 D&R157 48, 1389, 145X. v. Denmark, App. No. 7465/76 (1977) 7 D&R153 289X. v. Germany, App. No. 2413/65 (1966) 23 CD 1 224X. v. Germany, App. No. 7705/76 (1977) 9 D&R 196 148X. v. Germany, App. No. 8410/78 (1980) 18 D&R 216 184X. v. Germany, App. No. 8682/79 (1981) 26 D &R 97 239X. v. Germany, App. No. 8741/79 (1981) 24 D&R 137 208, 285X. v. Germany, App. No. 9235/817 (1982) 29 D&R 194 81X. and Y. v. Germany, App No. 7641/76 (1976) 10 D&R 224 142
X. v. Iceland, App. No. 2525/65 (1967) 18 CD 33X. v. Italy, App. No. 6741/74 (1976) 5 D&R 83 79X. v. The Netherlands, App. No. 1068/61, 5 Yearbook (1962)
278 122
X. v. The Netherlands, App. No. 2065/63, 8 Yearbook (1965)266 137, 155
xviii T A B L E O F C A S E S
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 21/436
X. v. The Netherlands, App. No. 2988/66, 10 Yearbook (1967)472 332
X. v. Sweden, App. No. 9820/82 (1984) 5 EHRR297 100, 270, 331
X. and the Church of Scientologyv. Sweden, App. No. 7805/77 (1979)16 D&R 68 226, 252
X. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 5442/72 (1975) 1 D&R 41 260,324, 334, 337
X. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 6084/73 (1975) 3 D&R 62X. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 6886/75 (1976) 5 D&R 100 251X. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 7291/75 (1977) 11 D&R 55X. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 7992/77 (1978) 14 D&R 234 256X. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 8010/77 (1979) 16 D&R 101 267,
330
X. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 8160/78 (1981) 22 D&R27 1445,147, 177, 188, 211, 225, 241, 247, 267, 337
X. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 8231/78 (1982) 28 D&R 5 256X., Y. and Z. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 8566/79 (1982) 31
D&R 50 167
Yanasikv. Turkey, App. No. 14524/89 (1993) 74 D&R14 141, 217,318, 345
Views and Decisions of the Human Rights Committee
A group of associations for the defence of the rights of disabled andhandicapped persons in Italy, and persons signing thecommunication, on 9th January1984 v. Italy, CommunicationNo. 163/1984 (decision 10 April 1984), UN Doc. A/39/40(1984), p. 197 226
A. and S. N. v. Norway, Communication No. 224/1987 (decision of11July1988), UN Doc. A/43/40 (1988), p. 246 1789
Ahani v. Canada, Communication No. 1051/2002 (views of29 March2004), UN Doc. A/59/40 vol. 2 (2004), p. 260 52
Arenz v. Germany, Communication No. 1138/2002 (decision of24
March 2004), UN Doc. A/59/40 vol. 2 (2004), p. 548B.d.B. et al. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 273/1988 (decision
of30 March 1989), UN Doc. A/44/40 (1989), p. 286 191Bhinder K. Singh v. Canada, Communication No. 208/1986 (views of
9 November 1989), UN Doc. A/45/40 vol. 2 (1990), p. 501323, 146, 191, 240, 257, 332
T A B L E O F C A S E S xix
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 22/436
Boodoo v. Trinidad and Tobago, Communication No. 721/1997 (viewsof2 August 2002), UN Doc. A/57/40 vol. 2 (2002), p. 76 135,239, 257
Brinkhofv. The Netherlands, Communication No. 402/1990 (decisionof 27 July1993), UN Doc. A/48/40 vol. 2 (1993), (1994) 14HRLJ 410 193, 345
Broeks, S. W. M. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 172/1984(views of9 April 1987), UN Doc. A/42/40 (1987), p. 139 187
Buckle v. New Zealand, Communication No. 858/1999 (views of25 October 2000), A/56/40, p. 175 269
C. v. Australia, Communication No. 900/1999 (views of28 October2002) UN Doc. A/58/40 vol. 2 (2003), p. 188 52
Coeriel, A. R. and M. A. R. Aurikv. The Netherlands, CommunicationNo. 453/1991 (views of31 October 1994), UN Doc A/50/40 vol.2 (1999), p. 21 1334, 279
Danning, L. G. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 180/1984(views of9 April 1987), UN Doc. A/42/40 (1987), p. 151 183
De Groot, Leonardus J. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 578/
1994 (decision of14 July1995), UN Doc. A/50/40 vol. 2 (1999),p. 179 1312
E.P. et al. v. Colombia, Communication No. 318/1988 (decision of15 July1990), UN Doc. A/45/40 (1990), p. 184 278
E.W. et al. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 429/1990(decision of8 April 1993), UN Doc. A48/40 vol. 2 (1993),p. 198
Faurisson, Robert v. France, Communication No. 550/1993 (views of8 November 1996), UN Doc. A/52/40 vol. 2 (1999), p. 84 82,83, 108, 298, 300
Foin, Frederic v. France, Communication No. 666/1995 (views of3 November 1999), (2000) 7(2) IHRR354 194, 346
G.T. v. Canada, Communication No. 420/1990 (decision of22 March1990), (1994) 1(1) IHRR46 146
H.A.E.d.J. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 297/1988
(decision of30 October 1989), UN Doc. A/45/40 vol. 2 (1990),p. 176 191
Hartikainen v. Finland, Communication No. 40/1978 (views of9 April1981), UN Doc. A/36/40 (1981), p. 147 17881
Hertzberg and others v. Finland, Communication No. R.14/61 (views of2 April 1982), UN Doc. A/37/40 (1982), p. 161 186, 327
xx T A B L E O F C A S E S
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 23/436
Hopu, Francis and Tepoaitu Bessert v. France, Communication No.549/1993 (views of29 July1997), UN Doc. A/52/40 vol. 2(1999), p. 70 238, 240
J.v.K. and C.M.G.v.K.-S. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 483/1991(decision of23 July1992), UN Doc. A/47/40 (1994), p. 435 155
Jansen-Gielen v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 846/1999(views of3 April 2001), UN Doc. A/56/40 vol. 2, p. 158 267
J.H.W. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 501/1992 (decision of16 July1993) (1994) 1(2) IHRR39 187
J.P. v. Canada, Communication No. 466/1991 (decision of7 November1991), UN Doc. A/47/40 (1994), p. 426 155, 220
J.P.K. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 401/1990 (decision of7 November 1991), UN Doc. A/47/40 (1994), p. 405 151
J.R.T. and the W.G. Partyv. Canada, Communication No. 104/1981(decision of6 April 1983), UN Doc. A38/40 (1983), p. 231 79
Jarvinen, Aapo v. Finland, Communication No. 295/1988 (views of25 July1990), UN Doc. A/45/40 vol. 2 (1990), p. 101 194
Kang v. Korea, Communication No. 878/1999 (views of15 July2003),
UN Doc. A/58/40 vol. 2 (2003), p. 152 32Kitokv. Sweden, Communication No.197/1985 (views of27 July1988),
UN Doc. A/43/40 (1988), p. 221 279Kivenmaa, Auli v. Finland, Communication No. 412/1990 (views of
31 March 1994) (1994) 1(3) IHRR88 300K.V. and C.V. v. Germany, Communication No. 568/1993 (decision of
8 April 1994), UN Doc. A/49/40, vol. 2 (1994), p. 365 155Lansman, Jouni E. et al. v. Finland, Communication No. 671/1995
(views of30 October 1996), UN Doc. A/52/40 vol. 2 (1999),p. 191 279
L.T.K. v. Finland, Communication No. 185/1984 (decision of9 July1985), UN Doc. A/40/40 (1985), p. 240 148, 150, 151
M.A. v. Italy, Communication No. 117/81 (decision of10 April 1984),UN Doc. A/39/40 (1984), p. 190 7980
M.A.B., W.A.T. and J.-A.Y.T. v. Canada, Communication No. 570/
1993 (decision of8 April 1994), UN Doc. A/49/40, vol. 2 (1994),p. 368 128, 209, 238, 251
M.B.B. v. Sweden, Communication No. 104/1998, UN Doc. CAT/C/22/D/104/1998 (views of5 May1999) (2000) 7(2) IHRR400
M.J.G. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 267/1987 (decision of24 March 1988), UN Doc. A/43/40 (1988), p. 271 1901
T A B L E O F C A S E S xxi
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 24/436
Maille, Richard v. France, Communication No. 689/1996 (views of10July2000) (2000) 7(4) IHRR947 148
Mathews, Patterson v. Trinidad and Tobago, Communication No. 569/
1993 (views of31 March 1998), UN Doc. A/53/40 (1998),p. 30 1345, 257
Nam v. Korea, Communication No. 693/1996 (decision of28 July2003), UN Doc. A/58/40 vol. 2 (2003), p. 390 180
Paez, W. Delgado v. Colombia, Communication No. 195/1985 (viewsof12 July1990), UN Doc. A/45/40 vol. 2 (1990), p. 43 1456,267
Palandjian v. Hungary, Communication No. 1106/2002 (decision of30 March 2004), UN Doc. A/59/40 vol. 2 (2004), p. 534
Park, Tae-Hoon v. Korea, Communication No. 628/1995 (views of20 October 1998) (1999) 6(3) IHRR623 165, 210, 293, 325
P.S. v. Denmark, Communication No. 397/1990 (decision of22 July1992), UN Doc. A/47/40 (1992), p. 395 268
Riley et al. v. Canada, Communication No. 1048/2002 (decision of21 March 2002), UN Doc. A/57/40 vol. 2 (2002), p. 356 257
Ross, Malcolm v. Canada, Communication No. 736/1997 (views of18 October, 2000), UN Doc. A/56/40 vol. 2 (2001), p. 69 82,207, 221, 222, 260, 263, 3001, 304, 307, 329
Sanles Sanles v. Spain, Communication No. 1024/2001 (decision of30March 2004), UN Doc. A/59/40 vol. 2 (2004), p. 505
Somers, Ivan v. Hungary, Communication No. 566/1993, (views of23 July1996), UN Doc. A/51/40 vol. 2, (1997), p. 144 183
T.W.M.B. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 403/1990(decision of7 November 1991), UN Doc. A/47/40 (1994),p. 411 151
Vakoume, Mathieu and others v. France, Communication No. 822/1998 (decision of31 October 2000), UN Doc. A/56/40 vol. 2,p. 249 238
Van der Ent, Gerrit v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 657/1995(decision of3 November 1995), UN Doc. A/51/40 vol. 2 (1997),
p. 276 132Waldman, Arieh Hollis v. Canada, Communication No. 694/1996
(views of3 November 1999) (2000) 7(2) IHRR368 178, 179,181, 192, 2667
Westerman, Paul v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 682/1996(views of3 November 1999) (2000) 7(2) IHRR363
xxii T A B L E O F C A S E S
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 25/436
X. v. Australia, Communication No. 557/1993 (decision of16 July1996),UN Doc. A/51/40 vol. 2 (1997), p. 235
Zundel v. Canada, Communication No. 953/2000 (decision of27 July
2003), UN Doc. A/58/40 vol. 2 (2003), p. 483 82Zwaan-de Vries, F.W. v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 182/
1984 (views of9 April 1987), UN Doc. A/42/40 (1987),p. 160 183
The Human Rights Chamber for Bosnia and Herzegovina
The Islamic Community in Bosnia and Herzegovina v. The RepublikaSrpska, Case No. CH/96/29 (decision of11 June 1999) (2000)7(3) IHRR833 244, 246
Mahmutovic, Dzevad v. The Republika Srpska, Case No. CH/98/892(decision of8 October 1999) (2000) 7(3) IHRR869 284
T A B L E O F C A S E S xxiii
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 26/436
TABLE OF TREATIES, DECLARATIONS, AND OTHERINTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS
Universal Declaration on Human Rights (1948), GA Res. 217A(III),UN Doc. A/3/810 (1949) 203, 3528
Article 18 1, 4, 7, 235, 355
drafting history 24Article 29 206, 293, 357
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights andFundamental Freedoms (1950), 213 UNTS 221 372
Article 1 317Article 2 165, 1669Article 4 149
Article6 227
Article 8 1767Article 9 2, 4, 7, 17, 22, 26, 72, 757, 100, 116, 201, 204, 244, 284,
306, 313, 317, 330, 3434, 347, 349, 3501gratuitously profane expressions 956legal obligation 121proselytism 112
Article 10 80, 106, 108, 113, 170, 2045, 328, 330, 3434
Article 11 1001, 227, 311, 314Article 12 283Article 14 183, 18990Article 17 80, 101, 165, 313Article 25 17Article 26 17Article 27 17
Article 52 18discretion to states under 185limitation 161Protocol 11 16, 384publications 263
Convention on Equal Remuneration for Men and Women Workers forWork of Equal Value (1951), 165 UNTS 257 183
xxiv
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 27/436
Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention (1958),362 UNTS 31 183
UNESCO Convention against Discrimination in Education (1960),
429 UNTS 93 183International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination (1965), 660 UNTS 195 9, 80International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), 999 UNTS
171 1015, 36, 156, 203, 35868Article 2 12, 18, 47, 183, 359Article 5 46, 79, 101, 360Article 6 51, 361Article 17 165, 365Article 18 1, 4, 8, 9, 1113, 14, 15, 19, 22, 28, 435, 51,
63, 78, 151, 165, 177, 194, 206, 220, 269, 306, 323,325, 365
Article 19 221, 305, 366Article 20 77, 101, 305, 366Article 25 46, 368
Article 26 183, 190, 368Article 31 11Article 40 10, 11, 13Articles 110 12limitation 161Optional Protocol 79, 82
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights(1966), 993 UNTS 3 36
International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of theCrime of Apartheid (1973), 1015 UNTS 243 184
Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and PoliticalRights (1976), 999 UNTS 171 10, 14, 15, 79, 1312
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination againstWomen (1979), 1249 UNTS 13 184
Declaration on the Elimination of all Forms of Intolerance and of
Discrimination based on Religion or Belief (1981), GA Res. 36/55,UN Doc. A/36/51 (1982) 2, 4, 8, 15, 26, 35, 56, 36872
Article 1 4, 5, 369Article 6 22, 66, 204, 221, 226, 235, 236, 262, 329, 334, 336,
347, 371Article 8 28, 372
T A B L E O F T R E A T I E S xxv
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 28/436
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or DegradingTreatment or Punishment (1984), 1465 UNTS 3
article 3 51
Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989), 1577 UNTS 3 34Protocol 11 to the European Convention on Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms (1994), 155 ETSEuropean Framework Convention for the Protection of National
Minorities (1995), 157 ETS 5, 18, 250, 259, 276, 279
xxvi T A B L E O F T R E A T I E S
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 29/436
ABBREVIATIONS
AC Appeal CasesAIR All India ReporterAm J Intl L American Journal of International LawBrigham Young UL Rev Brigham Young University Law ReviewBYBIL British Yearbook of International LawCambridge LJ Cambridge Law JournalCase W Res J Intl L Case Western Reserve Journal of
International LawCD Collected Decisions of the European
Commission of Human RightsCHR Commission on Human RightsCIL Contemporary Issues in LawCon & Lib Conscience & LibertyCornell Intl LJ Cornell International Law JournalEcc LJ Ecclesiastical Law JournalEc Rev Ecumenical ReviewECtHR European Court of Human Rights
Judgments and DecisionsEd & Law Education and the LawEHRLR European Human Rights Law Review EHRR European Human Rights ReportsEmory Intl L Rev Emory International Law ReviewEmp Lawyer Employment LawyerESCOR United Nations Economic and Social
Council Official RecordsETS European Treaty SeriesEur L Rev European Law ReviewGA Res. General Assembly ResolutionGAOR General Assembly Official RecordsHarv Intl LJ Harvard International Law JournalHarv L Rev Harvard Law Review
xxvii
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 30/436
Harv WLJ Harvard Womens Law JournalHR & UKP Human Rights and UK PracticeHRLJ Human Rights Law Journal
HRQ Human Rights QuarterlyHRJ Human Rights JournalICCPR International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (1966)IHRR International Human Rights ReportsILM International Legal MaterialsInt JLP & F International Journal of Law, Policy and
the FamilyIntl & Comp Law Q International and Comparative Law
QuarterlyIntl Bull Miss Res International Bulletin of Missionary
ResearchIntl Commn Jurists Rev Review, International Commission of
JuristsIsr YB Hum Rts Israel Yearbook on Human Rights
J Church & St Journal of Church and StateJ Civ Lib Journal of Civil LibertiesJ Soc Wel Law Journal of Social Welfare LawKCLJ Kings College Law JournalMed Sc & L Medicine, Science and the LawNeth Intl L Rev Netherlands International Law ReviewNLJ New Law JournalNorthern Ireland LQ Northern Ireland Legal QuarterlyNorthw UL Rev Northwestern University Law ReviewNYUJ Intl L & Pol New York University Journal of
International Law and PoliticsODIHR Office for Democratic Institutions and
Human RightsOSCE Organization for Security and Co-operation
in Europe, formerly the Conference for
Security and Co-operation in EuropeOxford J Leg Stud Oxford Journal of Legal StudiesPac Rim L & Poly J Pacific Rim Law and Policy JournalPat of Prej Patterns of PrejudicePL Public LawPlen. Mtg Plenary Meeting
xxviii L I S T O F A B B R E V I A T I O N S
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 31/436
Pol Quart Political QuarterlyRADIC African Journal of International and
Comparative Law
Rat Jur Ratio JurisRCADI Receuil des Cours de lAcademie de Droit
International de la HayeSanta Clara L Rev Santa Clara Law ReviewSCR Supreme Court ReportsU Chicago L Rev University of Chicago Law ReviewUN United NationsUNTS UN Treaty SeriesVand J Transnatl L Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational LawVirginia J Intl L Virginia Journal of International LawWCRP World Conference on Religion and PeaceWilliam Mary L Rev William and Mary Law ReviewWLR Weekly Law ReportsYBECHR Yearbook of the European Commission
of Human Rights
Yearbook Yearbook of the European Conventionon Human Rights
L I S T O F A B B R E V I A T I O N S xxix
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 32/436
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 33/436
1
In t rodu c t i on
Overview
A n a p p r a i s a l o f t h e d e v e l o p m e n t a n d c o n t e n t o f t h e f r e e d o m o f t h o u g h t ,c on sc ie nc e a nd r el ig i on h as n ev er b ee n m or e c ha ll en gi n g. E ve nt s s in cet h e c o l l a p s e o f t h e f o r m e r S o v i e t U n i o n a n d t h e a f t e r m a t h o f t h e a t t a c k so f 1 1 S ep te mb er 2 00 1 h av e c on fr o nt ed t he t ra di ti on al c on ce pt o f f r ee -d o m o f r e l i g i o n w i t h a n e n t i r e l y n e w r a n g e o f d e m a n d s . T h e s e c o u l d n o th av e b ee n a nt ic ip at ed b y t he d ra ft er s o f t he c or e f re ed om o f r el ig io nA r t i c l e s i n t h e f o u n d a t i o n a l i n s t r u m e n t s . I n t h e U n i t e d N a t i o n s c o n t e x tt h e s e are Ar t ic l e 1 8 o f t h e Un i v er sa l D ec la ra ti on o n H um an R ig ht s( th e Un iv er sa l D ec la ra ti o n )1 a nd Ar ti c l e 1 8 o f th e I n t e rn a t io n a lC ov en an t o n C iv il a nd P oli ti ca l R ig ht s ( t he I CC PR ) .2 W it hi n t he
1 Th e f u l l t e x t o f t h e U n i v e rsa l D e c l a ra t i o n i s a t A n n e x 1 . A rt i c l e 1 8 o f t h e U n i v e rsa lD e c l a r a t i o n r e a d s a s f o l l o w s :
E ve ry o ne h as t h e r i gh t t o f r ee do m o f t h ou gh t , c o ns c ie nc e a nd r el ig i on ; t h isr i gh t i n cl ud e s f r ee do m t o c ha ng e h is r e li gi o n o r b e li ef , a n d f r ee do m , e it h er
a lo ne o r i n c om mu ni ty w it h o th er s a nd i n p ub li c o r p ri va te , t o m an if es t h isr e l i g i o n o r b e l i e f i n t e a c h i n g , p r a c t i c e , w o r s h i p a n d o b s e r v a n c e .
( U n i v e r s a l D e c l a r a t i o n o n H u m a n R i g h t s , a d o p t e d a n d p r o c l a i m e d b y G AR e s . 2 1 7 A ( I I I ) o f 1 0 D e c e m b e r 1 9 4 8 , U N D o c . A / 3 / 8 1 0 ( 1 9 4 9 ) ) .
2 Th e k e y A rt i c l e s o f t h e I C C P R a re se t o u t i n A n n e x 2. A rt i c l e 1 8 o f t h e I C C P R re a d s a sf o l l o w s:
1 . Ev er yo ne s ha ll h av e t he r ig ht t o f re ed om o f t ho ug ht , c on sc ie nc e a ndr e l i g i o n . T h i s r i g h t s h a l l i n c l u d e f r e e d o m t o h a v e o r t o a d o p t a r e l i g i o n o r
b e l i e f o f h i s c h o i c e , a n d f r e e d o m , e i t h e r i n d i v i d u a l l y o r i n c o m m u n i t y w i t ho t h e r s a n d i n p u b l i c o r p r i v a t e , t o m a n i f e s t h i s r e l i g i o n o r b e l i e f i n w o r s h i p ,o b s e r v a n c e , p r a c t i c e a n d t e a c h i n g .
2 . N o o n e s h al l b e s u bj ec t t o c oe r ci o n w h i ch w ou l d i m p ai r h i s f re e do m t o h a v eo r t o a d o p t a r e l i g i o n o r b e l i e f o f h i s c h o i c e .
3 . F re ed om t o m an if es t o ne s r el ig io n o r b el ie fs m ay b e s ub je ct o nl y t o s uc hl im it at io ns a s a re p re sc ri be d b y l aw a nd a re n ec es sa ry t o p ro te ct p ub li cs a f e t y , o r d e r , h e a l t h , o r m o r a l s o r t h e f u n d a m e n t a l r i g h t s a n d f r e e d o m s o f o t h e r s .
1
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 34/436
C o n ve n t io n f o r t h e Pro t e c t io n o f H u m a n R igh t s a n d F u n d a m e n t a lF re e d o m s ( t h e Eu ro p e a n C o n ve n t io n ) , a d o p t e d u n d e r t h e a u s p ic e s o f t h e C o u n c il o f Eu ro p e , t h e k e y p ro vis io n is A rt ic l e 9 .3 Eve n t h e
D e c l a ra t io n o n t h e El im in a t io n o f a l l F o rm s o f In t o l e ra n c e a n d o fD is c rim in a t io n B a s e d o n R e l igio n o r B e l ie f ( t h e 1 9 8 1 D e c l a ra t io n ) ,4
w hi ch w as c on cl ud ed m uc h l ate r an d w as th e fi rs t in te rn at io na l in st ru -m e n t d e d ic a t e d s o l e l y t o f re e d o m o f re l igio n , d id n o t c o n t e m p l a t e re c e n tp a t t e rn s o f vio l a t io n w h ic h a re e m e rgin g gl o b a l l y .
T h o s e t e x t s c o n s t it u t e t h e b a s ic b u il d in g b l o c k s o f t h e f re e d o m o f re l igio n a n d w e re in e vit a b l y s h a p e d b y t h e is s u e s w h ic h f a c e d t h e o ri-gin a l d ra f t e rs . Pro m in e n t a re a s o f c o n t e n t io n in t h e e a rl y d e b a t e s w e rere s is t a n c e t o a n e x p l ic it righ t t o c h a n ge re l igio n ( f ro m va rio u s Is l a m icc o u n t rie s ) , d o u b t s a b o u t p ro s e l y t is m a s a n a d j u n c t t o t h e righ t t op ra c t is e a re l igio n a n d , m o re ge n e ra l l y , t h e id e o l o gic a l o p p o s it io nf ro m n u m e ro u s C o m m u n is t c o u n t rie s t o t h e a s s e rt io n o f righ t s o f t h ein d ivid u a l o ve r t h e in t e re s t s o f t h e S t a t e . T h e e x t e n t t o w h ic h n e u t ra l it y s h o u l d b e p re s e rve d in S t a t e e d u c a t io n w a s a l s o a f u n d a m e n t a l , t h o u ghm o re re c e n t , c o n c e rn ( in t h e IC C PR a n d t h e 1 9 8 1 D e c l a ra t io n ) .
H o w e ve r, s in c e t h o s e in s t ru m e n t s w e re c o n c l u d e d a n u m b e r o f t re n d sh a ve t e s t e d w h e t h e r t h e t e x t o f t h e c o re p ro vis io n s is s u f fic ie n t t o a d d re s st h e im m e d ia t e a n d f o re s e e a b l e c h a l l e n ge s o f t h e f u t u re . A m o n g s u c h
4 . Th e S t a t e s P a rt i e s t o t h e p re se n t C o v e n a n t u n d e rt a k e t o h a v e re sp e c t f o r t h el i b e rt y o f p a re n t s a n d , w h e n a p p l i c a b l e , l e g a l g u a rd i a n s t o e n su re t h ere l i g i o u s a n d m o ra l e d u c a t i o n o f t h e i r c h i l d re n i n c o n f o rm i t y w i t h t h e i ro w n c o n v i c t i o n s.
( I n te r n at i o n al Co v e n an t on C i v il an d P o l i ti c a l R i g ht s ( 1 9 66 ) , N e w Y o r k ,1 6 D e c e m b e r 1 9 6 6 , i n f o r c e 2 3 M a r c h 1 9 7 6 , 9 9 9 U N T S 1 7 1 )
3 Th e k e y A rt i c l e s o f t h e E u ro p e a n C o n v e n t i o n a re se t o u t i n A n n e x 4 . A rt i c l e 9 o f t h eE u ro p e a n C o n v e n t i o n re a d s a s f o l l o w s.
1 . E v e ry o n e h a s t h e ri g h t t o f re e d o m o f t h o u g h t , c o n sc i e n c e a n d re l i g i o n ; t h i sri g h t i n c l u d e s f re e d o m t o c h a n g e h i s re l i g i o n o r b e l i e f a n d f re e d o m , e i t h e ra l o n e o r i n c o m m u n i t y w i t h o t h e r s a n d i n p u b l i c o r p r i v a t e , t o m a n i f e s t h i sre l i g i o n o r b e l i e f , i n w o rsh i p , t e a c h i n g , p ra c t i c e a n d o b se rv a n c e .
2 . F re e d o m t o m a n i f e st o n e s re l i g i o n o r b e l i e f s sh a l l b e su b j e c t o n l y t o su c h
l i m i t a t i o n s a s a re p re sc ri b e d b y l a w a n d a re n e c e ssa ry i n a d e m o c ra t i c so c i e t y i n t h e i n t e r e s t s o f p u b l i c s a f e t y , f o r t h e p r o t e c t i o n o f p u b l i c o r d e r , h e a l t h o rm o ra l s, o r f o r t h e p ro t e c t i o n o f t h e ri g h t s a n d f re e d o m s o f o t h e rs.
( E u r o p e a n C o n v e n t i o n o n H u m a n R i g h t s a n d F u n d a m e n t a l F r e e d o m s(1950), Rome, 4 November 1950 in force 3 September 1953, 213 UNTS 221)
4 Th e f u l l t e x t o f t h e 1 9 8 1 D e c l a ra t i o n i s a t A n n e x 3 ( D ec l ar a t io n o n t h e E l i mi n at i o n o f a ll F or ms o f I nt ol er an ce a nd o f D is cr im in at io n B as ed o n R el ig io n o r B el ie f ( 19 81 ),p r o c l a i m e d b y G A R e s . 3 6 / 5 5 o f 2 5 N o v e m b e r 1 9 8 1 , U N D o c . A / 3 6 / 5 1 ( 1 9 8 2 ) ) .
2 I N T R O D U C T I O N
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 35/436
t r en ds i s t he p o li t ic al m om en tu m i n m an y c ou nt ri e s o f t he f o rm er S o v ie tB l o c t o p r o t e c t t r a d i t i o n a l S t a t e r e l i g i o n i n r e s p o n s e t o t h e i n fl u x o f n e w r e li g io us m ov em en ts . N ew r el ig i ou s m ov em en ts fi ll ed t he v ac uu m l ef t
b y t he ab ru pt e xo du s o f Co mm un is m a nd ar e s ee n a s a th re at t o th ep r o c e s s o f r e b u i l d i n g t h e n a t i o n a l i d e n t i t y o f t h o s e c o u n t r i e s . O b s t a c l e si m p o s e d t o p r e v e n t t h e e m e r g e n c e o f n e w r e l i g i o u s m o v e m e n t s i n c l u d ep r oh i bi t i ve r e g is t ra t io n f o r ma l it i es r e qu i re d f o r t h ei r e s ta b li s hm e nt , a sw e ll a s w i de s pr e ad p r oh i bi t io n s o n r e li g i ou s p r ac t ic e , p a rt i cu l ar l y p r o-s el yt is m. T he pr ote ct io n o f tr adi ti ona l S ta te r el ig io n as a me an s o f r e i g n i t i n g n a t i o n a l i d e n t i t y i s a r e l a t i v e l y n e w i s s u e . U n t i l r e c e n t l y , t h ep r o t e c t i o n o f S t a t e r e l i g i o n h a s m o r e c o m m o n l y b e e n a f e a t u r e o f m a n y I s la mi c c ou nt ri es w he re n at io na l l aw i s i ns ep ar ab le f r om r el ig io us l aw a n d p r e s e r v a t i o n o f t h e o r t h o d o x y o f S t a t e r e l i g i o n i s p a r a m o u n t .
A n o t h e r r e c e n t t r e n d h a s b e e n t h e p r o n o u n c e d i n c i d e n c e o f r e l i g i o u sh a tr e d a g ai n st M us l i ms . T he x e no p ho b i a, i n to l er a nc e a n d d i sc r i mi n a-t i o n t o w a r d s M u s l i m s w h i c h f o l l o w e d t h e e v e n t s o f S e p t e m b e r 1 1 c a u s e dt he C om mi ss i on o n H um an R ig ht s t o r ea ct w it h c al ls f or a pp ro pr i at ec o n t r o l o f t h e m a s s m e d i a t o p r e v e n t i n c i t e m e n t t o v i o l e n c e a n d i n t o l -
e r a n c e t o w a r d s I s l a m .5
T h i s g a v e s t r e n g t h t o m o v e s w h i c h w e r e a l r e a d y a f o o t i n c e r t a i n c o u n t r i e s ( f o r e x a m p l e , A u s t r a l i a ) t o e n a c t l e g i s l a t i o n t op ro hi bi t v il i fic at io n o n g r ou nd s o f r e li g io n a nd h as s i nc e g iv e n r is e t oi n it ia ti v es i n o th er c ou nt ri es ( no ta bl y t he U ni te d K in gd om ) t o c re at er e l i g i o u s o f f e n c e s s u c h a s i n c i t e m e n t t o r e l i g i o u s h a t r e d . H o w e v e r , t h e r eh av e b ee n c onc er ns t ha t s uch a l ow t hr esh ol d c ould , in p rac ti ce, b ea p p l i e d t o t h i s t y p e o f l e g i s l a t i o n s o a s t o i n t e r f e r e d i r e c t l y w i t h f u n d a -m en ta l a sp ec ts o f f re ed om o f r e li g io n , p ar ti c ul ar ly r el ig i ou s p ra ct ic et h r o u g h t e a c h i n g a n d p r o s e l y t i s m . T h e r i s k s a r e i n h e r e n t i n t h e t e a c h i n go f a ny r el ig io n w hi ch a mo un ts t o t he d en ia l o f o th er r el ig io ns b ut a reg r e a t e r i n t h e c a s e o f c o m p a r a t i v e t e a c h i n g o r t e a c h i n g b y o n e r e l i g i o u sg r o u p o f t h e b e l i e f s o f a n o t h e r .
A t s a m e t i m e , t h e r e h a s b e e n m i s p l a c e d c o n c e r n t h a t t h e o v e r t p r a c -t ice o f I sl am is a p ro xy f or ext re mi sm. Th is h as i nfl ue nc ed c er tai nE ur op ea n S ta te s ( no ta bl y F ra nc e a nd S wi tz er la nd ) t o r ea ct a ga in st
t ra di ti on al M us li m o bs er v an ce , s uc h a s t he w ea ri ng o f r e li g io u s h ea d-d r e s s i n S t a t e s c h o o l s , r e l y i n g o n t h e o b l i g a t i o n o f n e u t r a l i t y o f S t a t e s i ne du ca ti on a nd ( in t he c as e o f S wi tz er la nd ) p ro hi bi ti n g r el ig i ou s h ea d-w e a r a s a f o r m o f p r o s e l y t i s m . T h e s a m e i s s u e h a s a d i f f e r e n t d i m e n s i o ni n T ur ke y w he re p ri nc ip le s o f s e cu la ri ty a re e nf or ce d m or e g en er al ly .
5 C H R R e s . 2 0 0 2 / 9 ( 2 0 0 2 ) o f 1 5 A p r i l 2 0 0 2 .
O V E R V I E W 3
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 36/436
F e a r s o f e x t r e m i s m , c o u p l e d w i t h a l a c k o f u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e r e q u i r e -m e n t s o f I s l a m h a s r e s u l t e d i n a w i d e s p r e a d f a i l u r e o n t h e p a r t o f m a n y E ur o pe an S ta te s t o a pp re ci at e t he i mp or ta nc e t o M us li ms o f s tr ai gh t-
f or wa rd r el i gi ou s p ra ct ic e a nd o bs er v an ce . T he 1 98 1 D ec la ra ti on h asd o n e m u c h t o c o rre c t t h is b y p ro vid in g a d e t a il e d e x p l a n a t io n o f d if f e re n tf o r m s o f m a n i f e s t a t i o n o f r e l i g i o n o r b e l i e f .
O n e o t h e r p h e n o m e n o n o f n o t e h a s b e e n t h e e m e r g e n c e o f p o l i t i c a lp ar ti es a do pti ng a n o ve rt ly r el ig io us a ge nd a, w it h th e m os t r ad ic alp ar ti es a dv o ca ti ng t he i nt ro du ct io n o f a s ys te m o f g ov er n me nt b as edo n r e l i g i o u s l a w . T h e a s p i r a t i o n s o f s o m e r e l i g i o u s p o l i t i c a l p a r t i e s h a v eg iv en r is e t o co nc er ns o ve r t he i mpo sit io n o f r el ig io us l aw o n no n-ad he re nts . O uts ide th e po li ti ca l sp he re p os iti ve e nd or se me nt h asu nd ou bt ed ly b ee n g iv e n r ec en tl y t o t he c ol le ct iv e , r at he r t ha n i nd iv i -d ua l, a sp ec ts o f r e li gi o us m an if es ta ti on t hr o ug h r e li gi o us a ss oc ia ti ona n d c h u r c h m e m b e r s h i p ( a n d t h i s g o e s s o m e w a y t o w a r d s d i s m a n t l i n gth e i mpe d im en t s t o re l ig io u s a s s o c ia t io n po s e d b y re gi str at i onre q u ire m e n t s ) .
R e c e n t y e a r s h a v e a l s o w i t n e s s e d a s t e a d y g r o w t h i n r e c o g n i t i o n o f t h e
c on sc ie nt io us i mp li c at io ns o f c om pu ls or y m il it ar y s er vi ce . T hi s h ass e r v e d t o d e m o n s t r a t e j u s t h o w u n d e v e l o p e d a r e t h e g e n e r a l p r i n c i p l e sc o n c e r n i n g v a r i o u s f o r m s o f c o e r c i o n , p a r t i c u l a r l y c o e r c i o n t o a c t c o n -t r a r y t o o n e s r e l i g i o n o r b e l i e f a n d c o m p u l s i o n t o d i s c l o s e o n e s b e l i e f s .O f t h e c o r e f r e e d o m o f r e l i g i o n A r t i c l e s , A r t i c l e 1 8 ( 2 ) o f t h e I C C P R a n dA rt ic le 1 (2 ) o f th e 1 98 1 D ec la ra ti on o ff er e xp li ci t p ro te ct io n a ga in stc o e r c i o n b u t o n l y a g a i n s t c o e r c i o n i n r e l i g i o u s c h o i c e . I t r e m a i n s t o b es e e n w h a t f u t u r e d i r e c t i o n t h e s e d e v e l o p m e n t s w i l l t a k e .
A n o t h e r d i m e n s i o n o f r e c e n t c h a n g e h a s b e e n t h e e s c a l a t i o n o f r e l i -g i o u s i n t o l e r a n c e b y n o n - S t a t e e n t i t i e s a n d t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g r o l e o f t h eS t a t e i n c o m b a t i n g i n t o l e r a n c e . G r e a t e r e m p h a s i s h a s b e e n p l a c e d o n t h ep o s i t i v e o b l i g a t i o n s o n S t a t e s t o p r o t e c t r i g h t s a n d f r e e d o m s b y a p p r o -pria te me a n s a n d i t i s e x pe c t e d th a t t hi s p rin c ip le w il l s e e gre at erp r a c t i c a l r e c o g n i t i o n i n f u t u r e y e a r s .
A l l t h e s e i s s u e s w i l l b e d i s c u s s e d i n d e t a i l i n l a t e r c h a p t e r s , w h i c h w i l l
a dd re ss t he o ri gi ns o f th e t ex t o f e ac h o f t he c or e f re ed om o f r el ig io nA r ti c le s a n d t h e d e v el o pm e nt o f s t an d ar d s a pp l ic a bl e t o e a ch c o ns t it u en tf re e d o m .
O ne o th er o bs er va ti on w or th ma ki ng a t t he o uts et c on ce rn s t heo b vi o us d i ff e re n ce s b e tw e en t h e U n it e d N a ti o ns a n d E u ro p ea n f r am e -w or ks . T he t ex tu al si mi lar iti es b et we en A rt ic le 9 o f t he E ur ope anC on ve nt i on a nd A rt ic le 1 8 o f t he U ni ve rs al D ec la ra ti o n f ro m w hi ch i t
4 I N T R O D U C T I O N
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 37/436
s te mm ed a re s el f- ev i de nt . H ow ev er , t he r e la ti v e h om og en ei ty o f l eg ala nd d em oc ra ti c s ys te ms a cr o ss E ur op ea n c ou nt ri es c on tr a st s w i th t hev as t r an ge o f i de ol og ic al , r eli gio us a nd c ul tu ra l f ou nda ti on s o f th e
s y s t e m s o f g o v e r n m e n t o f t h e n a t i o n s r e p r e s e n t e d w i t h i n t h e U n i v e r s a ls ys te m. I n s om e c ou nt ri es t he se fo un da ti on s e ve n g o t he r oo t o f t he irb as ic c on ce pt io n o f t he f re ed om o f t ho ug ht , c on sc ie nc e a nd r e li gi o n.F o l l o w i n g m o r e t h a n h a l f a c e n t u r y o f e x p e r i e n c e o f b o t h t h e E u r o p e a na n d U n i t e d N a t i o n s s y s t e m s , a n d i n t h e f a c e o f n e w p a t t e r n s o f r e l i g i o u si n to le r an ce i n r ec en t y ea rs , i t i s t im el y t o e xa mi n e c ri t ic al ly t he p at hst a k e n b y e a c h s y s t e m i n d e v e l o p i n g t h e s t a n d a r d s a p p l i c a b l e t o r e l i g i o u sf r e e d o m s i n c e t h e U n i v e r s a l D e c l a r a t i o n w a s a d o p t e d i n 1 9 4 8 , a n d s i n c et h e E u r o p e a n C o n v e n t i o n e n t e r e d i n t o f o r c e i n 1 9 5 3 .
Th is w or k t he re fo re ai ms t o p ro vid e an a ppr ai sal o f t he de ve lo p-m e n t o f t h e r ig ht to f r ee do m o f th o u gh t, c o n s c ie n c e an d r el i gio na t bo th U ni ted N ati ons a nd E ur op ean le ve ls . S tan da rd s w it hi n th eU ni te d N at io ns s ys te m a re r efl ec te d pr in ci pa ll y i n th e w or k o f t heH um an R ig ht s Co mm it te e a nd th e S pe ci al Ra pp or te ur ( t he S pe ci alR a p p o rt e u r )6 ap po int ed b y t he C omm is si on o n Hu ma n Ri ght s t o
e xa mi ne i nc id en ts a nd g ov er nm en ta l a cti on i nc on si st en t w it h t he1 98 1 D ec la r at io n. I n a dd it i on , w id er s ou rc es s uc h a s t he t r av a ux p r e-
parato ires o f m o s t i n s t r u m e n t s t o u c h i n g u p o n f r e e d o m o f r e l i g i o n p l a y a n e ss en ti a l p ar t. W it hi n E ur op ea n j ur i sp ru de nc e, t he p ra ct ic e o f t heE ur ope an Co ur t o n Hu ma n Ri ghts ( th e E ur ope an Co ur t) an d th ef or me r Eu ro pe an Co mm is sio n o n H um an Ri gh ts ( t he E ur ope anC om mi ss i on ) p ro vi de t he b as i s f or e v al ua ti n g d ev el op in g E ur op ea ns t a n d a r d s u n d e r t h e E u r o p e a n C o n v e n t i o n . A l t h o u g h t h i s w o r k i s p r i -m ar il y ai me d at t he c on clu si ons to b e dr aw n f ro m a c ri ti qu e o f th ep ra ct ic e o f t he U ni te d N at io ns a nd E ur o pe an i ns ti tu ti on s, o cc as io na lr e f e r e n c e w i l l b e m a d e t o o t h e r r e g i o n a l i n i t i a t i v e s f o u n d i n t h e C o u n c i lo f E ur ope F ra me wo rk C on ve nti on f or th e P ro te cti on o f N at io nalM in or it ie s a nd t he O rg an iz at io n f or S ec ur it y a nd C o- op er at io n i nEu ro pe ( OS CE, f o rm e rl y t he C o nf e re n ce f o r S e cu rit y a nd C o-o pe ra t io nin E ur op e) , a s w el l a s c er ta in s ys te ms o f n ati on al l aw w he re t he y h av e
p a r t i c u l a r r e l e v a n c e .Th e U ni te d Na ti ons an d th e E ur ope an s ys te ms w er e s el ec te d f or
e xa mi na ti on b ec au se o f t he h is to ri ca l i nt er re la ti on b et we en t he t wo
6 T h e t i tl e o f t h e Sp ec ia l R ap p or t eu r o n r e li gi o us i nt o le r an ce w as c ha n ge d t o S pe ci alR ap p or t eu r o n f r ee do m o f r el ig i on o r b el ie f b y C HR R es . 2 0 00 / 33 o f 2 0 A pr i l 2 0 0 0.
O V E R V I E W 5
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 38/436
( gi ve n t ha t A rt ic le 9 o f t he E ur op ea n C on ve nt io n w as t ak en f ro m t het e x t o f A r t i c l e 1 8 o f t h e U n i v e r s a l D e c l a r a t i o n ) . H o w e v e r , i t i s i m p o r t a n tt o a p p r e c i a t e f u l l y t h e s i g n i fi c a n c e o f a n y a p p a r e n t d e p a r t u r e s b e t w e e n
U ni te d N at io ns a nd E ur op ea n s ta nd ar ds a nd t o d is ti ng ui sh g en ui nef r o m s u p p o s e d p a t h s o f d i v e r g e n c e . S o m e d i f f e r e n c e s m a y b e e x p l a i n e dm e r e l y b y t h e d i f f e r e n t r o l e a n d f u n c t i o n p l a y e d b y e a c h o f t h e v a r i o u so rg an s f ro m w hi c h a pp li c ab le s ta nd ar ds o f r el ig io us f r ee do m m ay b ed e r i v e d o r t h r o u g h w h i c h t h e y a r e e x p r e s s e d . L i m i t a t i o n s o f l e g a l c o m -p et en ce a nd t ec hn ic al e xp er ti se a re a ls o r e le va nt . S om e d if fe r en ce s a reex pli ca bl e o nl y i n t er ms o f p ol ic y (fo r w hi ch hi sto ric al tr end s a rep ar ti cu la rl y i mp or ta nt ) w hi le o th er s a r e a tt ri bu ta b le t o t he d if fe r en tc o n t e x t s i n w h i c h U n i v e r s a l a n d E u r o p e a n s t a n d a r d s a p p l y .
A t h e m a t i c a p p r o a c h w i l l b e f o l l o w e d a s c l o s e l y a s p o s s i b l e t h r o u g h -o ut t hi s w or k i n o rd er t o d is ce rn t he a dv an ce s a nd r ev er sa ls o n p ar ti cu la ri ss ue s o f r ec ur ri ng i mp or ta nc e. A n i n- de pt h e va lu at io n o f a pp ar en td is cr ep an ci es w it hi n p ar ti c ul ar t he me s w il l h el p t o e xp os e t he s ig ni fi-c a n c e o f p o i n t s o f d i v e r g e n c e . A t h e m a t i c a p p r o a c h a l s o l e n d s i t s e l f t o a na s s e s s m e n t o f t h e f u t u r e d e v e l o p m e n t o f s t a n d a r d s o f r e l i g i o u s f r e e d o m
i n s u c h a w a y t h a t m i g h t a c h i e v e b e t t e r c o n s i s t e n c y b e t w e e n t h e U n i t e dN a t i o n s a n d E u r o p e a n i n s t i t u t i o n s , a n d m a y p o i n t t o t h e m o s t e f f e c t i v em e a n s o f u t i l i s i n g t h e e x i s t i n g o r g a n s .
O f t he m aj or r ec en t w or ks o n f re ed om o f r el ig io n, t ha t b y Ta hz ib7
r ep re se nt s t he m os t c om pr eh en si ve s ur ve y o f U ni te d N at io ns i ns tr u-m e n t s , a n d t h o s e b y M a l c o l m E v a n s8 a n d C a r o l y n E v a n s9 b o t h p r o v i d ep e n e t r a t i n g i n s i g h t i n t o t h e d e c i s i o n - m a k i n g o f t h e E u r o p e a n C o u r t a n dE u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o n . H o w e v e r , n o n e a t t e m p t s a n y d e t a i l e d t h e m a t i ce v a l u a t i o n o f b o t h E u r o p e a n a n d U n i v e r s a l s t a n d a r d s b e y o n d c o v e r a g eo f t h e s e p a r a t e h i s t o r i c a l d e v e l o p m e n t s o f t h e m a j o r U n i t e d N a t i o n s a n dEu ro pe an i ns tr um en ts a nd t he o cc as io na l c om pa ri so n b et we en t het w o .10 G i v e n t h e i m p o r t a n c e o f s u c h a n e v a l u a t i o n t h i s w o r k a t t e m p t st o d e v e l o p a f r a m e w o r k f o r t h e d i s c u s s i o n o f b o t h U n i t e d N a t i o n s a n d
7
B . G . T ah zi b, F re ed om o f R el ig io n o r B el ie f: E ns ur in g E ff ec ti ve I nt er na ti on al L eg al P ro t e ct i o n , T h e H a g u e / L o n d o n : M a r t i n u s N i j h o f f P u b l i s h e r s ( 1 9 9 6 ).8 M . D . E v an s , R e l i g i o u s L i b e r t y a n d I n t e r n a t i o n a l L a w i n E u r o p e , C a m b r i d g e : C a m b r i d g e
U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s ( 1 9 9 7 ).9 C . E v a n s , F r e e d o m o f R e l i g i o n U n d e r t h e E u r o p e a n C o n v e n t i o n o n H u m a n R i g h t s , O x f o r d :
O x f o r d U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s (2 0 0 1 ).10 A u se fu l o ve rv ie w o f t he r ol e o f U N a nd r eg io na l s ys te ms i n p ro te ct in g f re ed om o f
r el ig io n i s f ou nd i n N . L er ne r, R el i gi on , B el i ef s a n d I n te rn a ti o na l H u ma n R i gh ts ,M a r y k n o l l , N e w Y o r k : O r b i s ( 2 0 0 0 ).
6 I N T R O D U C T I O N
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 39/436
E ur ope an j ur is pr ud enc e. E xte ns iv e u se w il l b e m ad e o f th e S pe cia lR ap po rte ur s r ep or ts i n o rd er t o d em on st ra te t he v al ue o f th e r ol e o f t he S pe ci al R ap po rt eu r i n o ff er in g m or e i n- de pt h u nd er st an di ng o f
r e li gi o us c o nfl ic t a nd v io la ti o n t ha n t he b ar es t o ut li ne a va il ab le i n t heH uma n Ri ght s Co mmi tte e s r ev ie w o f St at e r ep or ts o r t he s pec ifi ci ns tan ce s c on si de re d i n in di vi du al co mmu ni ca ti on s. Th e Sp ec ia lR a pp o rt e ur s r e po r ts o f f er , i n t h e U n iv e r sa l c o nt e xt , a b e tt e r a p pr e ci a -t i o n o f t h e d y n a m i c s o f t h e f r e e d o m o f r e l i g i o n w h i c h , i t w i l l b e a r g u e d ,a re a ll t oo o ft en o ve rl oo ke d i n t he d ec is io ns o f t he E ur op ea n i ns ti tu -t i o n s . I t i s i m p o r t a n t t o b e a w a r e o f e m e r g i n g t r e n d s i n r e l i g i o u s i n t o l -e ran ce a nd t o h ee d t he w ar ni ng s t ha t ca n o nl y b e d is cer ne d fr om a ne xa mi na ti on o f s it ua ti on s w or ld wi de i n w hi ch t he w id es t v ar ie ty o f c u l tu re s , re lig io ns a n d va lu e s in t e rac t. It i s s u gge s t ed th a t th eE ur o pe an C ou rt m ig ht t ak e i nt o a cc o un t, f ar m or e t ha n h it he rt o, t hed i f f e r e n t s o u r c e s a n d g u i s e s o f i n t o l e r a n c e e v i d e n c e d g l o b a l l y a n d a n t i c i -p a t e m o r e f u l l y t h e i m p l i c a t i o n s a n d p o t e n t i a l r e a c h o f i t s d e c i s i o n s .
Interrelation between the UN and European systems
T he h is to ri c c on ne ct io n b et we en t he U ni ve rs al D ec la ra ti on a nd th eE u ro pe an C on ve nt io n f ro m w hi c h i t s te mm ed d es er ve s s pe ci al c om -m ent at t hi s s tag e. I t i s a ls o i mp or tan t t o n ote s ome o f t he pr ac ti calo bs ta cl e s f ac e d b y th e d e ve l o pm en t o f f re e do m o f re l i gio n i n th eU ni ve rs al c on te xt , w hi ch a rg ua bl y h av e l es s r el ev an ce t o E ur op e i nis o l a t io n .
A rt ic le 9 o f t he E ur op ea n C on ve nt io n d re w i ts i ns pi r at io n a nd i ts t ex tf r om A rt ic le 1 8 o f t he U ni ve rs al D ec la ra ti o n i n p ur su anc e o f t he e xp re ssa im o f t he E ur op ean C on ve nt ion i n t ak in g th e fi rst s te ps f or collectiveenforcement of certain rights stated in the Universal Declaration.11 Article9 was to be based as far as possible on Article 18 of the UniversalD ec la ra ti on t o r edu ce t he r is k o f de vi sin g de fin it io ns t ha t w er e a t o ddsw it h t ho se i n U ni te d N at io ns i ns tr ument s. T he tr av a ux p r eparatoires ofA rt ic l e 1 8 o f t h e U n ive rs a l D e c l a ra t io n ,12 a n d t h o s e o f s u b s e q u e n t U n it e d
11 P r e a m b l e t o t h e E u r o p e a n C o n v e n t i o n . F o r t h e d r a f t i n g o f t h e E u r o p e a n C o n v e n t i o n ,s e e C o u n c i l o f E u r o p e , C o l l e c t e d E d i t i o n o f T h e T r a v a u x P r epara toire s of the Europ eanC on ve nt i on o n H u ma n R i gh ts , 8 v ol s. , T he H ag ue : M ar ti nu s N ij ho ff (1 9 7 5 8 5 ). F orc om me nt ar y, s ee A . H . R ob er ts on a nd J . G . M er ri ll s, H um an R ig ht s i n t he W or ld ,M a n c h e s t e r : M a n c h e s t e r U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s ( 1 9 9 6 ).
12 F or c om me nt ar y o n t he d ra ft in g o f A rt ic le 1 8 o f t he Un iv er sa l D ecl ar at io n, s ee:N . R o b in so n, U n i ve rs al D e cla ra ti o n o f H u m an Ri gh t s : I t s O ri gi n s , S i g ni fi can ce , A p p li ca ti o n
U N A N D E U R O P E A N S Y S T E M S : I N T E R R E L A T I O N 7
More Cambridge Books @ www.CambridgeEbook.com
http://www.cambridgeebook.com/ -
7/27/2019 0521856493.Cambridge.university.press.freedom.of.Religion.un.and.european.human.rights.law.and.practice.jan.
http:///reader/full/0521856493cambridgeuniversitypressfreedomofreligionunandeuropeanhumanrightslawandpr 40/436
N at io ns i ns tr um en ts i n t he fi el d o f f re ed om o f r el ig io n, d em on st ra te t ha ts o m e o f t h e i n fl u e n c e s t h a t f a s h i o n e d t h e t e x t o f A r t i c l e 1 8 m a y b e s a i d t oha ve li ttle r ele van ce to Ar ti cle 9 o f t he C onv en ti on . So me o f t he m os t
s ign ific a n t is s u e s d e b a t e d in t h e f o rm u l a t io n o f A rt ic l e 1 8 o f t h e U n ive rs a lD e c l a ra t io n , s u c h a s t h e righ t t o c h a n ge re l igio n , a c c e n t u a t e t h e d if f e re n c e sb e tw e en ins t ru me n ts in te n de d f o r U nivers al a nd Euro pe an a pp lic at ion ,w er e r ai sed w it h g re ate r f or ce ( an d w er e t o ha ve l as ti ng i mp ac t) i n thede bate s tha t l ed up t o A rti cle 1 8 o f the I CC PR 13 a nd t he 1 98 1 D ec lar at io n.14
D ive rge n c e in t h e b a s ic c o n c e p t io n o f t h e f re e d o m o f re l igio n a t U n ive rs a llevel w as par ti cula rly marked w he n impetu s w as g iv en to a Unite dN at ion s in it iat ive o n re ligio u s in to l era nc e f o ll ow ing va rio us a nt i-S em itici nci de nt s i n t he e ar ly 1 960 s. T he G en era l A sse mb ly p as sed a r es ol ut io nc al li ng f o r t he p re pa ra ti on o f a d ra ft d ec la ra ti on a nd a d ra ft c on ve nt io non the eliminatio n o f r elig ious into le ra nc e. S im ul ta ne ou sl y, a d raf tdeclaration15 a nd a d ra ft c on ve nt io n16 w ere a dvan c ed o n t h e e lim in a tio n
and Interpretation, N e w Y o r k : I n s t i t u t e o f J e w i s h A f f a i r s ( 1958) ; R . C a s s i n , L a D eclarationU ni ve rs el le e t l a M is e e n O eu vr e d es D ro it s d e l H om me, 79 RCADI (1951) 2 41 ; B . K au fm an n,
D as P r ob l em d er G la ub en s- u nd U be rz eu gu n gs fr e ih ei t i m V olkerrecht, Zuri c h: S c h ul t h essPolygraphischer Verlag ( 1989) , p p . 1 24 46 ; M . S ch e in in , Ar t ic le 1 8 , i n A . E id e ( ed .) , TheU n iv er s al D ec l ar at i on o f H um an R i gh t s: A C om me nt a ry , O sl o: S ca nd i na vi an U ni v er s it y P r es s(1992) ; A . V er d oo d t, N a is sa nc e e t S ig ni fic an c e d e l a D ec la r at io n U ni ve rs el l e d es D ro i ts d elHomme (1964) , L o ur ai n: P a ri s S o ci ete det u de s m o ra le s, s oc ia ls e t j u ri di q ue s , E d it io n sN a u we l ae rt s (1964).
13 M . J . B os s uy t , G u i d e t o t h e T r a v a u x P r eparat oires of the Inter natio nal Covenan t on Civila n d P o l i t i c a l R i g h t s , D o r d r e c h t / L a n c a s t e r : M a r t i n u s N i j h o f f ( 1 9 8 7 ) . F o r c o m m e n t a r y o nt he d r af t in g o f A r ti cl e 1 8 o f t he I CC PR , se e : T . v an B ov en , D e V o l k e nr e c h t e l ij k eB es c he r mi ng v an d e g od s di en s tv r ij h ei d , A ss en , N et her la nd s: V an G or cu m ( 1 9 6 7 );
K . J . P ar ts ch , Fr ee do m o f C on sc ie nc e a nd E xp re ss io n, a nd P ol it ic al F re ed om s , i nL . H en k in