0632 "the system of rice intensification (sri) for
DESCRIPTION
Presenter: Zheng Jiaguo, Jiang Xinlu, Lu Xianjun, Tang Yonglu Institution: Crop Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China Subject Country: ChinaTRANSCRIPT
The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) forSuper High Yield of Rice in Sichuan Basin
Zheng Jiaguo, Jiang Xinlu, Lu Xianjun, Tang Yonglu(Crop Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China )
Leaf Area Index and dry-matter accumulation are much higher with SRI plants than for controls (CK)
Stems are strong and root system is well developed
Item Rice Stage Stem SheathGreen leaves
Withered leaves
Panicles Biomass
SRI
Full heading
6,396 6,555 7168.6 315.5 2,362 24,902
Mature 4,109 3,266 3390 2,667.3 13,592 25,407
CK
Full heading
3,775 5,595 3880.9 254.2 1,205 14,710
Mature 2,475 3,065 1661.2 1,639.6 7,936 15,833
SRI over CK(%)
Full heading
69.4 17.2 84.7 24.1 96.0 59.1
Mature 66.0 6.6 104.1 62. 7 71.3 60.5
Comparison of Dry Matter Accumulation
Fig. 1 Dynamic change of Leaf Area Index (LAI)
2345678
06-J ul 16-J ul 26-J ul 05-Aug 15-Aug 25-Aug
Date
L A
I
SRI
CK
Differences in Leaf Blade (cm)
Item
3rd leaf 2nd leaf Flag leaf Average
Length Width Length Width Length Width Length Width
SRI 64.25 1.57 71.32 1.87 57.67 2.17 64.41 1.87
CK 56.07 1.43 62.03 1.57 48.67 2.01 55.56 1.67
SRI Incr. 8.18 0.14 9.29 0.30 9.00 0.16 8.86 0.20
% 14.59 9.79 14.97 19.11 18.49 7.96 15.95 11.98
Internode, Panicle and Culm Length (cm)
6th 5th 4th 3rd 2nd 1st
Panicle
Length
Culm length
SRI 2.63 7.5711.7
314.4
722.4
745.4 25.64 137.79
CK 1.5 4.87 8.0712.0
321.0
741.7
725.17 118.98
%75.3
355.4
445.3
520.2
86.64 8.69 1.86 15.81
The improvement of SRI in Sichuan
40cm
40cm
Square planting with single seedling
Original
SRI
Improved
SRI
45cm
40cm
7cm
Oblong planting with triangle pattern
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
CK SRI S+3 S+T O+T
Transplanting pattern
Yie
ld(T
/ha)
Comparison of Transplanting Patterns
S+3= Square with 3 seedlings; S+T=Square with triangle; O+T=Oblong with triangle
Transplanting PatternYield(T/ha)
Comparing to CK
+ T/ha + %
Traditional (CK) 8.65 -- --
Standard SRI 10.42 1.77 20.4
Oblong + triangle SRI 13.39 4.74 54.8
Comparison between Triangle SRI and Standard SRI (SAAS, 2002)
Variety CXY 157
CXY 179
ⅡY 7
Spacing(㎝ )
40 40 40
Seedlings/hill
1 1 1
Hills/㎡ 6.25 6.25 6.25
Max. Tillers/hill
321.3 336.7 324
Panicles/㎡
177.9 172.8 172
Yield (t/ha) 10.03 10.47 9.62
Plant type is important. If the function leaves are too long, at the late growth stage their photosynthesis will decrease
Varieties Give Different Responses to SRI
Conclusions on SRI To Date:
• More grain is produced by these methods• Fewer insect and disease problems• Reduction in the amount of seeds needed • Water saving is achieved• But increase in time needed for irrigation • Land leveling has to be done more carefully• More weeding is needed• Organic fertilizer supply can be a constraint• Harder to transplant and manage small plants
Less input higher output , but more manual work
General speaking, the yield for farmers’ practice is about 8.5 t/ha in Sichuan.
• When SRI is introduced, the yield is increased about 20%.
• With improved SRI, the increase in yield is about 50%.
Preliminary Evaluation: SRI Is a Promising Way to Increase Yield
Factors Limiting Adoption
• It is harder to transplant the young seedlings at 2-leaf age in multiple cropping systems.
• Organic fertilizer is in short supply.
• Management practices such as hand weeding and keeping the soil moist are thought to be complex and laborious.
Mushroom Productionwith SRI
Tray nursery to raise young seedlings
Seedlings planted on mushroom beds