06w schuppener worked examples hyd&upl limit states

Upload: paco

Post on 04-Jun-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    1/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN wi th worked examples 13-14 June 2013, Dublin

    Worked examples an m

    Dr. Bernd Schuppener

    German Federal Waterways Engineering and

    Research Institute, KarlsruhePast Chairman of CEN TC250/SC 7

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    2/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Worked example:

    in an excavation

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved2

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    3/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Example: verification of failure by uplift UPL

    =

    LSPW =15 m

    ,

    Uk

    a = 10 m; b = 5 m

    conrete = 24,0 kN/m = 32,5

    = 10 kN/m Steel d = 2,34 kN/m

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved3

    k

    w

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    4/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    EN 1997-1: 2.4.7.4 Verification of uplift

    (1)P Verification for uplift (UPL) shall be carried out by checking

    that the design value of the combination of destabilisingpermanen an var a e ver ca ac ons dst;d s ess an orequal to the sum of the design value of the stabilisingpermanent vertical actions (Gstb d) and of the design value of any

    additional resistance to uplift (Rd):

    V G + R (2.8),where

    dst,d dst;d dst;d

    (2) Additional resistance to uplift may also be treated as a

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved4

    stb;d .

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    5/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    UPL partial factors and model factor

    Factor type Factor EN 1997-1 German NA

    and DIN

    1054

    Irish NA

    Permanent unfavourable

    action

    G;dst 1.0 1.0 1.0

    G;stb . . .

    Variable unfavourable action Q;dst 1.5 1.5 1.5

    Angle of shearing resistance 1.25 1.25 1.25

    Pile tensile resistance s;t 1.4 1.4 2.0

    Model factor on wall - 0.8 -

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved5

    resistance

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    6/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    UPL- verification with the weight of the structure only

    For the verifications the following quantities are needed:

    Self-wei ht base-slab:

    Base-slab: d = 1,0 m, concrete = 24,0 kN/m:Base-area A = a b = 10,0 5,0 = 50,00 m

    concrete = concreteGconcrete = 50 1,0 24,0 = 1200 kN.

    e we g s ee -p e-wa : SPW = , m, Steel = , m

    Weight per unit area: g = 78,0 0,03 = 2,34 kN/m,

    SPW = SPW = , =

    Total characteristic weight of the structure:

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved6

    Gk

    = Gconcrete

    + GSPW

    = 1200 + 1053 = 2253 kN

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    7/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    UPL-verification with the weight of the structure only

    G

    U

    V

    dst,d

    = Ud

    Gd

    dst,d stb;d d . .

    k G,dst k G,stbBut: 5000 1,00 = 5000 kN > 2253 0,90 = 2028 kN

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved7

    ence requ remen no sa s e

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    8/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    UPL-verification including wall fr ictional resistance R

    GR

    Vdst,dGstb;d + Rd +

    UdGd + Rd2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved8

    , s ,s

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    9/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Verification of failure by upli ft UPL frictional resistance R

    The characteristic value of the wall frictional resistance Rk will be

    treated as a stabilising action determined as the vertical

    a model factor of = 0,80:

    Rk = Eah,k tan a

    e wa r c on ang e s assume o e k = k. orhorizontal surface area and vertical wall the earth pressurecoefficient is Kah k = 0,25 (from Fig. C 1.1 of EN 1997-1 for k=32.5) and tan a = 0,397. The earth pressure is assumed to actonly on the outer surface of the sheet pile wall:

    E = 2 a + b 0 5 L K, ,

    Eah,k = 30 0,5 15 10 0,25 = 8437 kN

    Rk = Eah k tan k

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved9 Rk = 8437 0,397 0,8 = 2680 kN

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    10/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    UPL - including wall frictional resistance

    G

    R

    U

    U G + R Require: UdGd + Rd

    , ,But: 5000 1,00 = 5000 > (2253+2680) 0,90 = 4400 kN

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved10

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    11/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Example: Irish verif ication of uplift failure for UPL

    Calculation of Rd

    s ng k,inf= , , .e. e n er or c arac er s c va ue, an app y ng

    UPL = 1,25 to the tan(k,inf) to obtain to d and d, gives a design

    wall frictional resistance Rd value that is slightly greater than the

    characteristic value Rk, which is not acceptable.Hence a superior characteristic valuek,sup is needs to be used. This is

    o a ne , a er on an arr s , y assum ng a norma

    distribution for and a standard deviation of 3o so that k,sup = 32,5o + 2

    1.624 3 0 = 42.4o. Then a l in the artial factor of 1.25 as amultiplier to tan(k,sup) gives d,sup = 48.8

    o and hence an Rd value of

    2580 kN with a margin of safety of 1.33 on the characteristic value.

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved11

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    12/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Example: Irish verification of failure by uplift UPL

    R

    U

    Uk G,dstGk G,stb + RkG,stbRequire: UdGd + Rd

    i.e. 5000 1,00 = 5000 > 2253 0,90 + 2580 = 4608 kN

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved12

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    13/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    GEO partial factors and model factor

    DA1.C1

    DA1.C2 DA2 + DIN

    1054ermanen un avoura e

    action, transient situation

    G;dst . . .

    Permanent favourable G;stb 1.0 1.0 1.0

    actionVariable unfavourable

    action

    Q;dst 1.5 1.3 1.5

    Angle of shearing

    resistance

    1.0 1.25 1.0

    Pile tensile resistance s;t 1.25 1.6 1.4

    Model factor on wall - - 0.8

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved13

    resistance

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    14/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Irish design for GEO verification

    As explained previously,

    RG Rd is obtained using thesuperior value so that

    for:

    UEd Rd = 1,0, Rd = 3440 kN = 1,25, Rd = 2580 kNE

    d= U

    k

    G- G

    k

    G,inf= 5000

    G 2253

    G;inf. : d = , , = d =

    DA1.C2: Ed = 5000 1,02253 1,0=2747kN < Rd = 2580kN

    Hence GEO ULS is not satisfied

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved14

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    15/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    U lift - verification with tension iles

    EN 1997-1

    7.6.3 Piles - ground tensile resistance

    (3)P For tension piles, two failure mechanismsshall be considered:

    pull-out of the piles from the ground mass;

    uplift of the structure and the block of ground

    containing the piles.

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved15

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    16/36

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    17/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Pile design (GEO) for verif ication of failure by uplift

    G

    U

    F

    Ft,d = Uk G - (Gk+ Rk) G,infFt,d: design value of the action on the pilesG = 1.20 for unfavourable actions (according to DIN 1054 for

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved17

    G,inf= 1.00 for favourable effects of actions

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    18/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Pile design (GEO) for verif ication of failure by uplift

    G

    U

    Ed = UkG - (Gk+ Rk) G inf E1

    Ft,d = 5000 1,20 - (2253 + 2680) 1,00

    Ft,d = 6000 4933

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved18

    Ft,d

    = 1067 kN

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    19/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Pile design (GEO) for verif ication of failure by uplift

    E

    L

    Rt,dDriven iles: L = n L D = 0 5 m = 35 kN/m

    Rt,d = Ltot qs,k D / P

    , P = 1,40 (DIN 1054)

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved19 Rt,d = 39,25 Ltot

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    20/36

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    21/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Pile design (GEO) for verif ication of failure by uplift

    l =3 33 m

    1,66 m

    x

    3,33 m

    10,0 ma= , m

    3,33 m

    la=3,33 m

    1,66 m

    x

    2,50 m2,50 m

    5,0 m

    Selected:

    3 Piles L = 10 m

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved21

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    22/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Irish pile design for GEO verification of uplift failure

    As explained previously,

    G Rd is obtained using thesuperior value so that

    for:

    U

    = 1,0, Rd = 3440 kN = 1,25, Rd = 2580 kN

    Ed = UkG - Gk G,inf = 5000G 2253 G;inftd d . .

    Rt,d = Rt,k / s; t + Rd = Ltot qs,k D / s;t + Rd

    = Ltot35 0.5 / s;t + Rd = Ltot 54.98 / s;t + Rd

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved22

    Hence require: Lto t s;t (5000G 2253 G;inf Rd) / 54.98

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    23/36

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    24/36

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    25/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Verification of uplift of structure + ground

    oc con a n ng e p es

    G RVdst,dGstb;d + Rd (2.8)

    UdGd + Gsoil,d + Rd

    G

    k G,dst k soil,k k G,stb

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved25

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    26/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Determination of Gsoil,k according to DIN 1054, 8.5.4

    += cotll/LllnG babak,soil2231

    : num er o p es, L = engt o p es

    la = 5,0 m greater grid distance piles,

    =b , ,

    = 10,0 kN/m submerged weight soil = 0,80 model factor for the wei ht.

    Gsoil,k= 3{5,03,33(10

    1/3 cot 32,5)}0,81022 33305 ,, +

    soil,k =

    Model factor: = 0,80

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved26

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    27/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Verification of uplift of structure + ground

    oc con a n ng e p es

    GR

    U G + R + G

    G

    ,

    Uk G,dst(Gk+ Rk+ Gsoil,k) G,stb5000 6906 kN

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved27

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    28/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Worked example:

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved28

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    29/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    . . .

    (1)P When considering a limit state of failure due to heave

    , . ,

    be verified, for every relevant soil column, that the design

    value of the destabilising total pore water pressure (udst d )

    at the bottom of the column, or the design value of theseepage force (Sdst;d) in the column is less than or equal to

    e s a s ng o a ver ca s ress stb;d a e o om o

    the column, or the submerged weight (Gstb;d) of the same

    udst;d stb;d (2.9a)

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved29

    dst;d stb;d .

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    30/36

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    31/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Verification of safety against hydraulic heave

    hh =

    us ng ormu a y

    3 1t

    h1 ++

    h = 4,4 m

    4,1

    4,4=rh = 2,13 mh= 1,4 m

    60,6

    t = 6,60 mi = hr / t = 0,32

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved31

    u = (t + hr) w

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    32/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Verification of safety against hydraulic heave

    NN - 1,0 m Seepage force Sk:

    Sk = i W V

    NN - 4,0 mEffective self weight ofthe soil column Gk:

    NN - 5,4 m Gk = V

    Sk dst Gk G,stbk

    NN - 12,0 mSk

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved32

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    33/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Verification of safety against hydraulic heave

    Table A.17 - Partial factors on actions

    FAction Symbol Valuepermanent

    un avoura e

    favourableb

    G;dstG;stb

    .

    0.90

    unfavourablea G;stb 1.50

    a

    b stabilising

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved33

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    34/36

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    35/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    w wor e examp es - une, u n

    Safety against hydraulic heave: eq. 2.9bNN - 1,0 m udst;d stb;d

    u = t + h

    NN - 4,0 m

    hr= 2,13m

    u = (6.60+2.13)10- , m

    uk = 87.3 kN/mstb;k = t(+w)

    h= 1,4 m

    stb;k = 6.60 20

    stb;k

    = 132 kN/mt = 6,60 m

    NN - 12,0 m ukG,dst stb;kG,stb87.31.35 1320.90

    stb;d

    2013 Bernd Schuppener. All rights reserved35

    . .s ;

  • 8/13/2019 06w Schuppener Worked Examples HYD&UPL Limit States

    36/36

    Eurocodes:

    Background & Applications

    GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN wi th worked examples 13-14 June 2013, Dublin

    Geotechnical designw wor ex m l

    eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu