1 1 slide © 2006 thomson south-western. all rights reserved. slides prepared by john loucks st....
TRANSCRIPT
1 1 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Slidesprepared by
JOHN LOUCKS
St. Edward’sUniversity
2 2 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Chapter 13, Part AInventory Models: Deterministic Demand
Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Model Economic Production Lot Size Model Inventory Model with Planned Shortages
3 3 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Inventory Models
The study of inventory models is concerned with two basic questions:• How much should be ordered each time• When should the reordering occur
The objective is to minimize total variable cost over a specified time period (assumed to be annual in the following review).
4 4 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Inventory Costs
Ordering cost -- salaries and expenses of processing an order, regardless of the order quantity
Holding cost -- usually a percentage of the value of the item assessed for keeping an item in inventory (including finance costs, insurance, security costs, taxes, warehouse overhead, and other related variable expenses)
Backorder cost -- costs associated with being out of stock when an item is demanded (including lost goodwill)
Purchase cost -- the actual price of the items Other costs
5 5 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Deterministic Models
The simplest inventory models assume demand and the other parameters of the problem to be deterministic and constant.
The deterministic models covered in this chapter are:• Economic order quantity (EOQ)• Economic production lot size• EOQ with planned shortages• EOQ with quantity discounts
6 6 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)
The most basic of the deterministic inventory models is the economic order quantity (EOQ).
The variable costs in this model are annual holding cost and annual ordering cost.
For the EOQ, annual holding and ordering costs are equal.
7 7 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Economic Order Quantity
Assumptions• Demand is constant throughout the year at
D items per year.• Ordering cost is $Co per order.
• Holding cost is $Ch per item in inventory per year.
• Purchase cost per unit is constant (no quantity discount).
• Delivery time (lead time) is constant.• Planned shortages are not permitted.
8 8 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Economic Order Quantity
Formulas
• Optimal order quantity: Q * = 2DCo/Ch
• Number of orders per year: D/Q *
• Time between orders (cycle time): Q */D years
• Total annual cost: [(1/2)Q *Ch] + [DCo/Q *]
(holding + ordering)
9 9 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Example: Bart’s Barometer Business
Economic Order Quantity ModelBart's Barometer Business is a retail
outlet thatdeals exclusively with weather equipment. Bart is trying to decide on an inventoryand reorder policy for home barometers.
Barometers cost Bart $50 each anddemand is about 500 per year distributedfairly evenly throughout the year.
10 10 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Example: Bart’s Barometer Business
Economic Order Quantity ModelReordering costs are $80 per order and
holdingcosts are figured at 20% of the cost of the item. BBB isopen 300 days a year (6 days a week and closed twoweeks in August). Lead time is 60 working days.
11 11 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Example: Bart’s Barometer Business
Total Variable Cost Model
Total Costs = (Holding Cost) + (Ordering Cost)
TC = [Ch(Q/2)] + [Co(D/Q)]
= [.2(50)(Q/2)] + [80(500/Q)] = 5Q + (40,000/Q)
12 12 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Example: Bart’s Barometer Business
Optimal Reorder Quantity
Q * = 2DCo /Ch = 2(500)(80)/10 = 89.44 90
Optimal Reorder Point Lead time is m = 60 days and daily
demand is d = 500/300 or 1.667. Thus the reorder point r = (1.667)(60) = 100. Bart should reorder 90 barometers when his inventory position reaches 100 (that is 10 on hand and one outstanding order).
13 13 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Example: Bart’s Barometer Business
Number of Orders Per Year
Number of reorder times per year = (500/90) = 5.56 or once every (300/5.56) = 54 working days (about every 9 weeks).
Total Annual Variable Cost
TC = 5(90) + (40,000/90) = 450 + 444 = $894.
14 14 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Example: Bart’s Barometer Business
We’ll now use a spreadsheet to implementthe Economic Order Quantity model. We’ll confirmour earlier calculations for Bart’s problem andperform some sensitivity analysis.
This spreadsheet can be modified to accommodateother inventory models presented in this chapter.
15 15 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
A B1 BART'S ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY23 Annual Demand 5004 Ordering Cost $80.005 Annual Holding Rate % 206 Cost Per Unit $50.007 Working Days Per Year 3008 Lead Time (Days) 60
Example: Bart’s Barometer Business
Partial Spreadsheet with Input Data
16 16 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Example: Bart’s Barometer Business
Partial Spreadsheet Showing Formulas for Output A B C10 Econ. Order Qnty. =SQRT(2*B3*B4/(B5*B6/100))11 Request. Order Qnty12 % Change from EOQ =(C11/B10-1)*1001314 Annual Holding Cost =B5/100*B6*B10/2 =B5/100*B6*C11/215 Annual Order. Cost =B4*B3/B10 =B4*B3/C1116 Tot. Ann. Cost (TAC) =B14+B15 =C14+C1517 % Over Minimum TAC =(C16/B16-1)*1001819 Max. Inventory Level =B10 =C1120 Avg. Inventory Level =B10/2 =C11/221 Reorder Point =B3/B7*B8 =B3/B7*B82223 No. of Orders/Year =B3/B10 =B3/C1124 Cycle Time (Days) =B10/B3*B7 =C11/B3*B7
17 17 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Example: Bart’s Barometer Business
Partial Spreadsheet Showing OutputA B C
10 Econ. Order Qnty. 89.4411 Request. Order Qnty. 75.0012 % Change from EOQ -16.151314 Annual Holding Cost $447.21 $375.0015 Annual Order. Cost $447.21 $533.3316 Tot. Ann. Cost (TAC) $894.43 $908.3317 % Over Minimum TAC 1.551819 Max. Inventory Level 89.44 7520 Avg. Inventory Level 44.72 37.521 Reorder Point 100 1002223 No. of Orders/Year 5.59 6.6724 Cycle Time (Days) 53.67 45.00
18 18 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Example: Bart’s Barometer Business
Summary of Spreadsheet Results• A 16.15% negative deviation from the EOQ
resulted in only a 1.55% increase in the Total Annual Cost.
• Annual Holding Cost and Annual Ordering Cost are no longer equal.
• The Reorder Point is not affected, in this model, by a change in the Order Quantity.
19 19 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Economic Production Lot Size
The economic production lot size model is a variation of the basic EOQ model.
A replenishment order is not received in one lump sum as it is in the basic EOQ model.
Inventory is replenished gradually as the order is produced (which requires the production rate to be greater than the demand rate).
This model's variable costs are annual holding cost and annual set-up cost (equivalent to ordering cost).
For the optimal lot size, annual holding and set-up costs are equal.
20 20 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Economic Production Lot Size
Assumptions• Demand occurs at a constant rate of D
items per year.• Production rate is P items per year (and P
> D ).• Set-up cost: $Co per run.
• Holding cost: $Ch per item in inventory per year.
• Purchase cost per unit is constant (no quantity discount).
• Set-up time (lead time) is constant.• Planned shortages are not permitted.
21 21 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Economic Production Lot Size
Formulas
• Optimal production lot-size:
Q * = 2DCo /[(1-D/P )Ch]
• Number of production runs per year: D/Q *
• Time between set-ups (cycle time): Q */D years
• Total annual cost: [(1/2)(1-D/P )Q *Ch] + [DCo/Q *]
(holding + ordering)
22 22 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Example: Non-Slip Tile Co.
Economic Production Lot Size Model
Non-Slip Tile Company (NST) has been usingproduction runs of 100,000 tiles, 10 times per yearto meet the demand of 1,000,000 tilesannually. The set-up cost is $5,000 perrun and holding cost is estimated at10% of the manufacturing cost of $1per tile. The production capacity of the machine is 500,000 tiles per month. The factoryis open 365 days per year.
23 23 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Example: Non-Slip Tile Co.
Total Annual Variable Cost Model
This is an economic production lot size problem with
D = 1,000,000, P = 6,000,000, Ch = .10, Co = 5,000
TC = (Holding Costs) + (Set-Up Costs) = [Ch(Q/2)(1 - D/P )] + [DCo/Q]
= .04167Q + 5,000,000,000/Q
24 24 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
Optimal Production Lot Size
Q * = 2DCo/[(1 -D/P )Ch]
= 2(1,000,000)(5,000) /[(.1)(1 - 1/6)]
= 346,410
Number of Production Runs Per Year
D/Q * = 2.89 times per year.
Example: Non-Slip Tile Co.
25 25 Slide
Slide
© 2006 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved.
End of Chapter 13, Part A