1 albrecht kaupp, manager indo-german energy programme, igen, dsm, energy modesty, energy efficiency...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Albrecht Kaupp, ManagerIndo-German Energy Programme, IGEN,
DSM, energy modesty, energy efficiency and energy intensity
Demystified ?
2
Demand Side Management, DSM
Original definition coined 1972 by Gelling, EPRI, USA.
“The planning and implementation of those utility activities designed to influence customer use of electricity in ways that will produce desired changes in the utility’s load shape”.
3
History of DSM
DSM was promoted by over 2000 DSM programmes of about 1000 utilities in the USA between 1973 and 1998. After deregulation of the power sector in the USA, most DSM programmes collapsed and about 40 programmes were left in 1999.
Utilities in Germany and Japan never bothered about national DSM programmes.
4
Power utility intention behind DSM
Cut the “kW-load peaks” and fill up the “kW-load valleys” without reducing kWh electricity consumption of well paying customers, since they are a source of profit for a power utility.
Electricity savings (kWh) was a side effect of DSM but never the objective.
5
DSM makes only sense for a power utility, if
• DSM is applied to all non paying or below delivery cost paying customers, or
• DSM activities strictly reduce peak load without cutting into revenues from well paying customers.
6
No win-win situationA professional consulting firm offering services to an industrial customers to reduce electricity costs is not in the interest of a power utility.
Why?
The consulting firm gets only business from industry/ commerce that pay high power tariffs and do not steal power.
In other words a professional energy auditor will always cut into the profit of a power utility.
7
Sharing of global responsibilities !
Energy efficiency and energy modesty is not any longer a national issue.
It is a global responsibility of every country to practice energy modesty in particular industrialised and highly urbanised consumer societies.
8
Energy Conservation Day 14th December 2004
“We cannot blindly ape the west and pursue a highly resource intensive development or for that matter, resource intensive consumption patterns.
We must be under no illusion that we can in fact approximate consumption levels as we see them in the affluent western society. Indeed, in the interest of humanity and the sustainability of our life support system on this planet, it is the West that must bring its energy consumption level closer to ours rather than the other way round”.
Honourable Prime Minister of India
9
Per capita electricity consumption is the best indicator of “quality of life”
Check for excessive consumption despite high energy efficiency
Electricity consumption per capita (kWh)
10
Energy intensity (TOE/ GDP)Energy intensity is a good indicator of the development stage of a country in terms of
(i) Industrialisation
(ii) Urbanisation
(iii) Electrification
(iv) Consumerism
(v) Saturation of market for electrical appliances and cars
However it is a poor and perhaps irrelevant indicator to judge the “energy efficiency and energy modesty” of a nation. High energy intensities had been the past trademark of development of today’s highly industrialised countries and are therefore not so unusual for emerging economics.
11
How important is energy efficiency for the power sector
1. Non-paying customer # 1 the “T+D system” at speculatively estimated 10% - 25% technical loss.
2. Non-paying customer # 2 “station use” at speculative 8% loss. In other words two large consumers, Mr. Station loss and Mrs. T+D loss may consume > 25% and don’t pay for it.
3. Add to this the fuel energy loss of power generation at a average national power plant efficiency of 30.5%. The later figure however may be debatable.
12
Which plant efficiency do you fancy?
Lignite coal 3500 kCal/kg
GCV NCV
Net MWh 34.5 36.7
Gross MWh 38.3 40.8
Difference between GCV and NCV is 6.2%
13
Mapping software
How efficient are Indian power plants?
This may be the wrong question. It is better to ask how can we better establish and verify the present performance at the present configuration with the least effort.
14
Do you want energy efficiency for charity or aim for financial and
economic attractiveness?
There is always a most economic power plant efficiency based on fuel costs, expected IRR, technical life and plant load factor. The calculation principle is simple and based on the question.
“What premium could be paid for a plant if system efficiency is say better by 4% points” under the assumption that premium is recovered through fuel cost savings.
15
How much premium could be paid ?
Imax =(qn – 1) 8760 PLF CMWh (new - as is)
qn (q - 1) new as is
Imax =(1.1625 -1) 8760 500 (0.40 – 0.36)
1.1625 (0.16) 0.4 0.36= 0.74 Crore Rs/MW
16
Which are the important industries for energy efficiency and conservation
Order of magnitude rating# Sectors Criteria Ranking Sum
A B C
1. Thermal Power Station 1 2 1 4
2. Fertilizer 2 1 3 6
3. Cement 5 6 4 15
4. Iron & Steel 4 5 7 16
5. Chlor-Alkali 10 4 2 16
6. Aluminium 9 3 8 20
A = Total energy consumption in TOEB = Energy cost as percentage of total costC = Energy intensity “TOE/ Annual turnover”
17
Important impact check
Whatever policies, projects and programmes will be formulated and implemented in the power sector under the headings of energy efficiency, energy modesty or DSM asking the questions
“Does the measure help to decouple economic growth from growth in power consumption”
is a good way to start a discussion about the merit of the measure.
18
My equation for a global sustainable energy policy, GSEP
GSEP = energy modesty + energy efficiency + renewable energy
Exactly in this order of priority
19
Forcing more energy efficient electrical appliances into the market ! Which way to go?
Two major policy choices are
Choice 1: Believe in market forces and goodwill of a consumer. In other words believe in the existence of a well informed and cosmopolitan consumer who understands global energy supply and consumption issues and even acts rational by buying equipment with the lowest life cycle cost .
Choice 2: Remove the inefficient appliances from the market.
20
Electricity saving potentialEquipment Annual electricity
savings GWhOrganised sector
%
Industrial motors 1,231 98
Fluorescent tube lights 1,110 90
Agricultural pump sets 900 55
Refrigerators 695 100
Air conditioners 441 85
Ceiling & table fans 276 6
Industrial pumps 265 90
Ballasts 223 30
Industrial fans 218 85
Distribution transformers 202 50
Geysers (hot water) 147 ?
Compressors 79 95
CFLs (60W incandescent lamp) replacements 41 ?
Total 5,845
21
Relation between active material cost and efficiency in electric motors - 3 HP
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Motor 3hp
Ru
pe
es
60
65
70
75
80
85
Eff
icie
nc
y (
%)
Active material cost Efficiency
22
Thanking you