－109－

４．キャパシティ･アセスメント調査結果

1 CA 1

1.1

1.1.1

2 2009 9 1 2010 5 2

8 C/P

a. 3R

a.1 On-site (community) project :I.1.1 I.1.12

1 1 Expert A 4 6 C/P

2 1 Expert B 2

9 I.1.10

I.1.11

I.1.10 C/P

C/P

I.1.11 1 C/P

No. of C/Prated

Ave.Rate

No. ofC/P

Ave.Rate

No. of C/Prated

Ave.Rate

No. ofC/P

Ave.Rate

I.1.1 5 per. 3.40 0 per. - 3.40 5 per. 4.00 7 per. 3.71 3.85 13.2%I.1.2 6 per. 4.00 0 per. - 4.00 5 per. 4.00 7 per. 4.43 4.21 5.3%I.1.3 6 per. 3.83 0 per. - 3.83 5 per. 4.00 7 per. 4.43 4.21 9.9%I.1.4 5 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 0 per. - 7 per. 3.71 3.71 23.7%I.1.5 5 per. 3.80 0 per. - 3.80 5 per. 4.00 7 per. 4.14 4.07 7.1%I.1.6 5 per. 3.80 0 per. - 3.80 5 per. 4.00 7 per. 3.86 3.92 3.2%I.1.7 5 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 0 per. - 7 per. 4.00 4.00 33.3%I.1.8 5 per. 3.20 0 per. - 3.20 0 per. - 7 per. 3.86 3.86 20.5%I.1.9 5 per. 2.00 0 per. - 2.00 0 per. - 7 per. 2.43 2.43 21.4%I.1.10 6 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 7 per. 2.71 0 per. - 2.71 -9.5%I.1.11 6 per. 3.33 0 per. - 3.33 2 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -10.0%I.1.12 4 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 2 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 0.0%

Rate ofIncrease (%)

1st 2nd

Second Rating (May 2010)Rate by Expert A Rate by Expert B Combind

RateCode

First Rating (September 2009)

CombindRate

Rate by Expert A Rate by Expert B

Notes 1) “No. of C/P rated” C/P LCC NTC2)“Ave. rate” “No. of C/P rated” I.1.1 A 5 3.40 5

3)“Combined Rate” A B2009 9 A A

1

－110－

a.2 On-site (pilot project site) project :I.2.1 I.2.5

1 1 4 6 C/P

2 1

1

I.2.1 I2.4 C/P 6 2 1 7

I.2.5 JCC 2 LCC

NTC 1

No. of C/Prated

Ave.Rate

No. ofC/P

Ave.Rate

No. of C/Prated

Ave.Rate

No. ofC/P

Ave.Rate

I.2.1 6 per. 3.33 0 per. - 3.33 7 per. 3.43 0 per. - 3.43 2.9%I.2.2 6 per. 3.33 0 per. - 3.33 7 per. 3.43 0 per. - 3.43 2.9%I.2.3 6 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 7 per. 3.57 0 per. - 3.57 19.0%I.2.4 6 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 7 per. 3.86 0 per. - 3.86 28.6%I.2.5 4 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 2 per. 4.00 0 per. - 4.00 33.3%

Rate by Expert A Rate by Expert B CombindRate

Rate by Expert A Rate by Expert B CombindRate

Code

First Rating (September 2009) Second Rating (May 2010) Rate ofIncrease (%)

1st 2nd

Notes 1) “No. of C/P rated” C/P LCC NTC2)“Ave. rate” “No. of C/P rated” I.2.1 A 6 3.33 6

3)“Combined Rate” A B1 2 A A

a.3 Off-site (green waste) project :I.3.1 I.3.6

Off-site (green waste) project

2 1 C/P(LCC)

3

3R 3 Off-site (green waste) project :I.3.1 I.3.6

No. of C/Prated

Ave.Rate

No. ofC/P

Ave.Rate

No. of C/Prated

Ave.Rate

No. ofC/P

Ave.Rate

I.3.1 0 per. - 0 per. - - 1 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -I.3.2 0 per. - 0 per. - - 1 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -I.3.3 0 per. - 0 per. - - 1 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -I.3.4 0 per. - 0 per. - - 1 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -I.3.5 0 per. - 0 per. - - 1 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -I.3.6 0 per. - 0 per. - - 1 per. 3.00 0 per. - 3.00 -

Rate by Expert A Rate by Expert B CombindRate

Rate by Expert A Rate by Expert B CombindRate

Code

First Rating (September 2009) Second Rating (May 2010) Rate ofIncrease (%)

1st 2nd

Notes 1) “No. of C/P rated” C/P LCC NTC2)“Ave. rate” “No. of C/P rated”3)“Combined Rate” A B

A 2010 5 A

b. :I.4.1 I.4.4

1 2 1

1 C/P

－111－

2 1 C/P C/P

1

I.4.1 33.3%I.4.2 33.3%I.4.3 25.0%I.4.4 12.5%

First Rating (September 2009) Second Rating (May 2010) Rate ofIncrease(%) 1st

2nd

2 per. 5.002 per. 4.50

2 per. 4.002 per. 4.00

1 per. 4.001 per. 4.00

1 per. 3.001 per. 3.00

Rate by Expert C

No. of C/P rated Ave. Rate

Rate by Expert C

No. of C/P rated Ave. RateCode

1.1.2

LCC NTC 2009 1 2010 1

CA-2 CA-2

a. LCC

O.2

O.4

O.9 3R O.10 3R

3R

3R O.9 C/P

b. NTC

NTC Tunalia O.4

DOE

O.2

C/P O.7

CEO

3 2

LCC 3R O.9 3R

－112－

O.10 O.9 15

3R 3R

O.10

NTC JICA

C/P1 2009 1 2 2010 1

O.2 NTC 4 5 Tunalia

LCC

Vunato 2009 8

O.4

NTCTunalia

4.0haTunalia

DOE

LCC1 1 1 1

1 10 11

O.5

NTC 1 1 10

O.7 NTC Department of Health6

3 2

LCCDistrictO.9 3R

NTC 15 3R

LCCNTC

3R 23R

3R /O.10

3R

NTC 3R

1.1.3

a.

2009 9 1 2010 4 2 Field40 123 Matavolivoli

163

3

4

4 1 2

CA-3

－113－

a.1

i) Current waste management Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators

S.1.1 -In general, do you think that improper waste management causes problems?

No

S.1.2 -What kinds of problems are there?

S.1.3-Do you think that waste that your household produces contributes to these problems?

F40 1 2Yes No

S.1.4 -What do you think is the cause of these problems?

S.1.5-Does anyone in your household pick up rubbish from the sidewalk or public areas?

Yes, almost dailyNo

S.1.6-If you found a place that may need grass cutting in the sidewalk or public areas, what would you do?

Note. F40 Field 40, Mata: Matavolivoli

5 S.1.3

Field 40 1 2 Yes No

2

2

a.2

ii) Green waste collection service Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators

S.2.1 -Do you generate green waste (garden waste, off-cuts from plants and trees)?

Yes F40 Mata

S.2.2-The JICA Project has been collecting green waste at FJD 3 or 5 per 1.0 cubic meter in cooperation with Council. Did you know about this service?

Yes

S.2.3 -Have you ever paid for the green waste collection service? No

S.2.4 -How do you discharge green waste? Mata

Note. F40 Field 40, Mata: Matavolivoli

S.2.2

S.2.3 No

S.2.4 Matavolivoli

NTC 2009 1

Matavolivoli

－114－

a.3

iii) Recyclables collection service Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators

S.3.1

-Do you know the collection service of the recyclables including PET bottles, plastics, tin cans, aluminum & steel cans and spray cans, metal, paper, cardboard, grass bottles and jars, and old clothes, that are collected once a week by Council as a part of the JICA Project?

Yes

S.3.2-Have you ever used the collection service of the recyclables that are collected once a week by Council as a part of the JICA Project?

1F40

S.3.3 -Would you like to continue to support in the recyclables collection service?

Yes, very much

S.3.4 -Why would you like to continue to support in the recyclables collection service?

F40 Mata

S.3.5 -Why would you not like to continue to support in the recyclables collection service?

S.3.6 -Why do you not participate in the collection service? Mata

7Note. F40 Field 40, Mata: Matavolivoli

S.1.1

1 1

S.3.2

S.3.6 Matavolivoli

1 2

7

a.4

iv) Current status of home composting Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators

S.4.1-The JICA Project handed over a composter to the households that wanted it in five dollars. Did you get the composter from the JICA Project?

No

S.4.2 -Would you like to continue to use the composter? YesS.4.3 -Why would you like to continue to use the composter?

S.4.4 -Why would you not like to continue to use the composter?

S.4.5 -Would you like to own a composter? NoF40

Note. F40 Field 40, Mata: Matavolivoli

S.4.5 No Field 40

－115－

1.1.4

1.1.4 2009 1 2010 1

CA-4 3R

1.2

1.2.1

a. 2

2009 9 C/P

3R

CA

C/P

C/P

b.

C/P3R 2

3R LCC NTC 7LCC 3

c.

C/P 3R

CA

d.

2009 10 1 3 2011 2

4

－116－

1) On-site (community) project i) Communication and presentation in the community meetingCode Inquiry Items/ Indicators

I.1.1 -The C/P can regularly hold (plan) a community meeting or make home visits in a community for promoting the 3R activities of the Project.

I.1.2 -The C/P can speak in a clear and firm tone of voice in a community meeting or when he or she explains to community residents during a home visit.

I.1.3 -The C/P can make the meeting participants understood the purpose of a community meeting or make residents understood the purpose of home visit.

I.1.4 -The C/P can hear opinions from more participants in a community meeting or from residents through home visit.

I.1.5 -The C/P can create a relaxed atmosphere in which more participants can voice their opinions in a community meeting or in which residents can voice their opinions during the home visit by the Project team.

I.1.6 -The C/P can properly make a presentation using the materials (instructions of composting, environmental education material, etc.) in a community meeting or during a home visit.

I.1.7 -The C/P can appropriately solve the problems raised in a community meeting or during a home visit. I.1.8 -The C/P can wrap up discussions on the meeting agendas or meeting results.

I.1.9 -The C/P can take minutes of a community meeting (M/M), including attendance list or summarize the results of home visits.

ii) Preparation of the material for the community meeting Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators

I.1.10-The C/P can prepare the materials (instructions of composting, environmental education material, etc.) for the community meeting or home visit.

iii) Reporting Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators I.1.11 -The C/P can report his or her activity in the community project at weekly meetings. I.1.12 -The C/P can report their progress of the community project at JCC meetings.

2) On-site (pilot project site) project

i) Instruction Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators I.2.1 -The C/P can properly instruct the trainees to be able to work for the on-site project (pilot site project).

ii) Training arrangement Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators I.2.2 -The C/P can prepare the instruction materials for the trainees of the on-site project (pilot site project).

I.2.3 -The C/P can collect trainees and prepare necessary materials such as fuel or equipment (excepting one provided by JICA) for the on-site project (pilot site project).

iii) Reporting Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators I.2.4 -The C/P can report his or her activity in on site project (pilot site project) at weekly meetings. I.2.5 -The C/P can report their progress of on site project (pilot site project) at JCC meetings.

3) Off-site (Green Waste) project

i) Communication Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators

I.3.1 -The C/P can properly explain about the objectives of the green waste project to the external organizations which may be concerned (e.g. FSC, SPF, market, private company, and hotel).

I.3.2 -The C/P can hear opinions from more external organizations which may be concerned.

I.3.3 -The C/P can appropriately solve the issues raised in the discussion with the external organizations which may be concerned.

I.3.4 -The C/P can suggest to JET about the better way for working with the external organizations which may be concerned.

ii) Reporting Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators I.3.5 -The C/P can report his or her activity in the green waste project at weekly meetings. I.3.6 -The C/P can report their progress of the green waste project at JCC meetings.

－117－

i) Management Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators

I.4.1 -The C/P can do management for the improvement including buffer zone and divider constructions, access road rehabilitation, periphery bank and drain works to be proceeded as planned.

I.4.2 - The C/P can properly do landfill management.

ii) Reporting Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators I.4.3 -The C/P can report his or her activity in the Landfill Management Project at weekly meetings. I.4.4 -The C/P can report his or her activity in the Landfill Management Project at JCC meetings.

e.

1 5 13 5

Scale Notes5 Yes, very much well, not have to give any advice to the C/P 4 Yes, very well, but need giving a little bit of advice to the C/P 3 Feel well, but need some advice to the C/P 2 Not very well, need giving much advice to the C/P 1 Not well at all, the C/P needs much time to learn this item

1.2.2

a. 2

CA

1 3R

2

2

SWM

SWM SWM 3R 3R

Code Indicator GeneralO.1 -Population and area Technical aspect O.2 -Collection and haulage O.3 -Public area cleansing O.4 -Final disposal O.5 -Equipment and maintenance Management system for Solid Waste Management O.6 -SWM system at the National Level O.7 -SWM system at the local level O.8 -Financial status of SWM C/P side’s awareness on 3R O.9 -Dissemination of 3R experience to other local governments

O.10 -Documentation of knowledge and experience in 3R promotion

－118－

b.

LCC NTC O.1 O.10O.6 O.9 O.10 DOE

c.

2009 10 11 1 3 2009 1

1

1.2.3

a.

Field 40 Matavolivoli2009 9

286 Field 40 123 Matavolivoli 163

b.

3R

1) Social aspect i) Current waste management Code Inquiry Items/ Indicators S.1.1 -In general, do you think that improper waste management causes problems? S.1.2 -What kinds of problems are there? S.1.3 -Do you think that waste that your household produces contributes to these problems? S.1.4 -What do you think is the cause of these problems? S.1.5 -Does anyone in your household pick up rubbish from the sidewalk or public areas? S.1.6 -If you found a place that may need grass cutting in the sidewalk or public areas, what would you do? ii) Green waste collection service S.2.1 -Do you generate green waste (garden waste, off-cuts from plants and trees)?

S.2.2 -The JICA Project has been collecting green waste at FJD 3 or 5 per 1.0 cubic meter in cooperation with Council. Did you know about this service?

S.2.3 -Have you ever paid for the green waste collection service? S.2.4 -How do you discharge green waste? iii) Recyclables collection service

S.3.1-Do you know the collection service of the recyclables including PET bottles, plastics, tin cans, aluminum & steel cans and spray cans, metal, paper, cardboard, grass bottles and jars, and old clothes, that are collected once a week by Council as a part of the JICA Project?

S.3.2 -Have you ever used the collection service of the recyclables that are collected once a week by Council as a part of the JICA Project?

S.3.3 -Would you like to continue to support in the recyclables collection service? S.3.4 -Why would you like to continue to support in the recyclables collection service? S.3.5 -Why would you not like to continue to support in the recyclables collection service? S.3.6 -Why do you not participate in the collection service? iv) Current status of home composting

S.4.1 -The JICA Project handed over a composter to the households that wanted it in five dollars. Did you get the composter from the JICA Project?

S.4.2 -Would you like to continue to use the composter? S.4.3 -Why would you like to continue to use the composter?

－119－

S.4.4 -Why would you not like to continue to use the composter? S.4.5 -Would you like to own a composter?

c.

2 9 2009 9 1

3 2011 2 4

1.2.4

2009 10 11 1 3

2009 10 11 1 3 2009 1

1

i) Policy at the National Level Code Inquiry Items IS.1.1 -Statement on 3R promotion in the National Waste Management Policy

ii) Legal System on Waste Management IS.2.1 -Legal System at the National Level IS.2.2 -Legal System at the Local Level

－120－

５．ラウトカ処分場一部改善 PPの状況

－121－

６．住民啓発、環境教材

－122－

－123－

－124－

－125－

７．外部リソースとの連携

JOCV

JOCV

NGO

－126－

８．評価グリッドに沿った調査結果概要

－127－

－128－

－129－

－130－

－131－

－132－

－133－

－134－

－135－

９．質問票フォーマット

　　９－１　専門家用質問票

－136－

－137－

－138－

－139－

－140－

－141－

－142－

　　９－２　C/P用質問票Q

uest

ionn

aire

for

Coun

terp

arts

of F

iji M

id-t

erm

Rev

iew

Nam

e:

Posi

tion

Job

Resp

onsi

bilit

ies

:

Perio

d of

you

ras

sign

men

t:

QUE

STIO

NS

SUB-

QUE

STIO

NS

12

34

0RE

ASO

N(S

)/CO

MM

ENTS

0.1.

1 A

s fo

r ac

tiviti

es y

ou w

ere

enga

ged

in, d

o yo

u th

ink

that

pla

nned

act

iviti

esw

ere

carr

ied

out s

moo

thly

for

the

1st f

isca

l yea

r (O

ct. 2

008

Mar

. 200

9) ?

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Not

App

licab

le

0.1.

2 I

f the

y w

ere

not,

wha

t wer

e th

e pr

oble

ms?

0.1.

3 H

ow d

id y

ou c

ope

with

them

?

0.1.

4 A

s fo

r ac

tiviti

es y

ou w

ere

enga

ged

in, d

o yo

u th

ink

that

pla

nned

act

iviti

esw

ere

carr

ied

out s

moo

thly

for

the

2nd

fisca

l yea

r (Ap

r. 2

009

Up to

now

)?N

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soN

a

0.1.

5 I

f the

y w

ere

not,

wha

t wer

e th

e pr

oble

ms?

0.1.

6 H

ow d

id y

ou c

ope

with

them

?

0.2.

1. A

re y

ou s

atis

fied

with

the

tech

nica

l tra

nsfe

r/ad

vise

from

JICA

exp

erts

you

are

wor

king

toge

ther

, in

term

s of

its

cont

ent,

trai

ning

leng

th o

f tim

e, h

is/h

er te

achi

ngm

etho

dolo

gy, e

tc. ?

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Na

0.2.

2 To

mak

e th

e te

chni

cal t

rans

fer

mor

e ef

fect

ive,

if y

ou h

ave

any

sugg

estio

nsan

d re

ques

ts to

the

JICA

expe

rt, p

leas

e ex

plai

n.

0.3.

1 H

ave

you

cond

ucte

d th

e m

onito

ring

of p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ities

?If

you

have

con

duct

ed th

e m

onito

ring,

how

oft

en h

ave

you

done

?N

ever

Rare

ly1~

2 tim

esRe

gula

rlyN

aFr

eque

ncy:

0.3.

2 W

hen

you

cond

uct t

he m

onito

ring,

hav

e yo

u al

way

s re

ferr

ed to

the

Proj

ect

Des

ign

Mat

rix (P

DM

) of t

his

Proj

ect?

Nev

erRa

rely

1-2

times

Regu

larly

Na

0.3.

3 D

o yo

u th

ink

that

the

curr

ent m

onito

ring

syst

em is

app

ropr

iate

?N

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soN

a

0.3.

4. If

you

hav

e an

y co

mm

ents

/ s

ugge

stio

ns o

n cu

rren

t mon

itorin

g sy

stem

,pl

ease

exp

lain

.

0.4.

1.W

ho c

ould

be

the

first

per

son

to c

onta

ct w

hen

you

com

e ac

ross

the

prob

lem

in c

arry

ing

out p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ities

?

04.2

.Wha

t are

the

diff

icul

ties

you

have

exp

erie

nced

in th

e de

cisi

on m

akin

g to

car

ryou

t pro

ject

act

iviti

es?

0.4.

3 If

you

have

any

com

men

ts/s

ugge

stio

ns o

n th

e cu

rren

t dec

isio

n m

akin

gpr

oces

s, p

leas

e ex

plai

n.

0. Im

plem

enta

tion

Proc

ess

0.1

Impl

emen

tatio

nPr

oces

s.

0.4

Dec

isio

nM

akin

g Pr

oces

s

0.2.

Tec

hnic

alTr

ansf

er

0.3

Mon

itorin

g of

proj

ect

impl

emen

tatio

n

－143－

QUE

STIO

NS

SUB-

QUE

STIO

NS

12

34

0RE

ASO

N(S

)/CO

MM

ENTS

0. Im

plem

enta

tion

Proc

ess

0.5.

1. D

o yo

u th

ink

that

you

hav

e ha

d a

good

rel

atio

nshi

p (o

r m

aint

aine

d a

good

com

mun

icat

ion)

with

JICA

exp

erts

who

m y

ou a

re w

orki

ng to

geth

er?

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

good

Very

goo

dD

iffic

ult t

oju

dge

0.5.

2. If

you

wan

t to

furt

her

impr

ove

the

rela

tions

hip

with

them

, wha

t do

you

thin

kne

eds

to b

e do

ne?

0.5.

3. D

o yo

u th

ink

that

you

hav

e ha

d a

good

rel

atio

nshi

p am

ong

mem

bers

of C

Psof

Fiji

(in

DO

E, L

LC, N

TC) ?

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

good

Very

goo

dD

iffic

ult t

oju

dge

0.5.

4. If

you

wan

t to

furt

her

impr

ove

the

rela

tions

hip

amon

g th

em, w

hat d

o yo

uth

ink

need

s to

be

done

?

0.5.

5. R

elat

ed A

genc

ies

(suc

h as

Min

istr

y of

Edu

catio

n, M

inis

try

of H

ealth

etc

. )D

o yo

u th

ink

that

you

nee

d to

impr

ove

the

rela

tions

hip

with

thos

e of

rela

ted

agen

cies

(suc

h as

MO

E, M

OH

etc

.) ?

If so

, wha

t do

you

thin

k ne

eds

to b

e do

ne?

Nee

ds a

gre

atde

al o

fim

prov

emen

t

Nee

ds a

litt

leim

prov

emen

t

Curr

ent

rela

tions

hip

isO

K

Alre

ady

mai

ntai

ned

ave

ry g

ood

rela

tions

hip

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

Sugg

estio

n fo

r im

prov

emen

t:

0.5.

6. R

ecyc

le C

ompa

nies

Do

you

thin

k th

at y

ou n

eed

to im

prov

e th

e re

latio

nshi

p w

ith re

cycl

e co

mpa

nies

?If

so, w

hat d

o yo

u th

ink

need

s to

be

done

?

Nee

ds a

gre

atde

al o

fim

prov

emen

t

Nee

ds a

litt

leim

prov

emen

t

Curr

ent

rela

tions

hip

isO

K

Alre

ady

mai

ntai

ned

ave

ry g

ood

rela

tions

hip

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

Sugg

estio

n fo

r im

prov

emen

t:

0.5.

7. L

ocal

Con

sulta

nts

Do

you

thin

k th

at y

ou n

eed

to im

prov

e th

e re

latio

nshi

p w

ith lo

cal c

onsu

ltant

s?

Ifso

, wha

t do

you

thin

k ne

eds

to b

e do

ne?

Nee

ds a

gre

atde

al o

fim

prov

emen

t

Nee

ds a

litt

leim

prov

emen

t

Curr

ent

rela

tions

hip

isO

K

Alre

ady

mai

ntai

ned

ave

ry g

ood

rela

tions

hip

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

Sugg

estio

n fo

r im

prov

emen

t:

0.5.

8.Co

mm

unity

lead

ers

Do

you

thin

k th

at y

ou n

eed

to im

prov

e th

e re

latio

nshi

p w

ith c

omm

unity

lead

ers

?If

so, w

hat d

o yo

u th

ink

need

s to

be

done

?

Nee

ds a

gre

atde

al o

fim

prov

emen

t

Nee

ds a

litt

leim

prov

emen

t

Curr

ent

rela

tions

hip

isO

K

Alre

ady

mai

ntai

ned

ave

ry g

ood

rela

tions

hip

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

Sugg

estio

n fo

r im

prov

emen

t:

0.5.

9.Co

mm

unity

peo

ple

Do

you

thin

k th

at y

ou n

eed

to im

prov

e th

e re

latio

nshi

p w

ith c

omm

unity

peo

ple

?If

so, w

hat d

o yo

u th

ink

need

s to

be

done

?

Nee

ds a

gre

atde

al o

fim

prov

emen

t

Nee

ds a

litt

leim

prov

emen

t

Curr

ent

rela

tions

hip

isO

K

Alre

ady

mai

ntai

ned

ave

ry g

ood

rela

tions

hip

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

Sugg

estio

n fo

r im

prov

emen

t:

0.5.

10. N

GO

s (O

ISCA

etc

. )D

o yo

u th

ink

that

you

nee

d to

impr

ove

the

rela

tions

hip

with

NG

Os

?If

so, w

hat d

o yo

u th

ink

need

s to

be

done

?

Nee

ds a

gre

atde

al o

fim

prov

emen

t

Nee

ds a

litt

leim

prov

emen

t

Curr

ent

rela

tions

hip

isO

K

Alre

ady

mai

ntai

ned

ave

ry g

ood

rela

tions

hip

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

Sugg

estio

n fo

r im

prov

emen

t:

0.5.

11.JO

CVs

Do

you

thin

k th

at y

ou n

eed

to im

prov

e th

e re

latio

nshi

p w

ith JO

CVs

(at L

CC a

ndN

TC)?

If so

, wha

t do

you

thin

k ne

eds

to b

e do

ne?

Nee

ds a

gre

atde

al o

fim

prov

emen

t

Nee

ds a

litt

leim

prov

emen

t

Curr

ent

rela

tions

hip

isO

K

Alre

ady

mai

ntai

ned

ave

ry g

ood

rela

tions

hip

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

Sugg

estio

n fo

r im

prov

emen

t:

0.5.

12. O

ther

rel

ated

sta

keho

lder

s (fa

rmer

s, s

choo

ls, e

tc.)

Do

you

thin

k th

at y

ou n

eed

to im

prov

e th

e re

latio

nshi

p w

ith o

ther

sta

keho

lder

s ?

Ifso

, wha

t do

you

thin

k ne

eds

to b

e do

ne?

Nee

ds a

gre

atde

al o

fim

prov

emen

t

Nee

ds a

litt

leim

prov

emen

t

Curr

ent

rela

tions

hip

isO

K

Alre

ady

mai

ntai

ned

ave

ry g

ood

rela

tions

hip

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

Sugg

estio

n fo

r im

prov

emen

t:

0.6.

1. D

o yo

u th

ink

that

DO

E ha

s ta

ken

an in

itiat

ive

to p

roce

ed th

e pr

ojec

t act

iviti

es?

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

hD

iffic

ult t

oju

dge

0.6.

1. D

o yo

u th

ink

that

LCC

/ N

TC h

as ta

ken

an in

itiat

ive

to p

roce

ed th

e pr

ojec

tac

tiviti

es?

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

hD

iffic

ult t

oju

dge

0.6.

3. H

ave

you

foun

d it

diff

icul

t to

carr

y ou

t the

spe

cific

pro

ject

act

ivity

? If

so,

plea

se e

xpla

in th

e ac

tivity

and

the

reas

on w

hy?

(ex.

tim

e co

nstr

aint

, hea

vy w

orkl

oad,

etc.

)Ve

ry d

iffic

ult

Som

ewha

tdi

ffic

ult

Man

agea

ble

Not

at a

lldi

ffic

ult

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

REAS

ON

(S)

0.7.

Oth

ers

0.7.

1. If

you

hav

e ob

serv

ed a

ny o

ther

issu

es /

pro

blem

s in

the

proc

ess

of p

roje

ctim

plem

enta

tion,

ple

ase

desc

ribe.

0.6

Ow

ners

hip

ofFi

ji Si

de

0.5

Com

mun

icat

ions

amon

gst

akeh

olde

rs

－144－

QUE

STIO

NS

SUB-

QUE

STIO

NS

12

34

0RE

ASO

N(S

) / C

omm

ents

1.0.

1.H

ow d

o yo

u de

scrib

e th

e Ja

pane

se te

chni

cal a

dvan

tage

s in

the

area

of m

inim

izat

ion

/re

cycl

ing

of s

olid

was

te?

1. 0

. 2. D

o yo

u th

ink

that

tech

nica

l lev

el in

trod

uced

by

the

JICA

expe

rts

is a

ppro

pria

te fo

r th

ecu

rren

t Fiji

situ

atio

n?N

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

QUE

STIO

NS

SUB-

QUE

STIO

NS

12

34

0RE

ASO

N(S

)/ C

OM

MEN

TS

2.1.

1 D

o yo

u th

ink

that

the

Proj

ect P

urpo

se.

Capa

city

of 3

R (R

educ

e, R

euse

, Rec

ycle

/Ret

urn)

of

Dep

artm

ent o

f Env

ironm

ent (

DO

E), L

auto

ka C

ity a

nd N

adi T

own

is in

crea

sed

thro

ugh

deve

lopi

ng3R

mod

el fo

r Fi

ji.w

ill b

e ac

hiev

ed b

y th

e en

d of

the

Proj

ect (

Mar

ch, 2

012)

?

For y

our r

efer

ence

, ind

icat

ors

to m

easu

re th

e ac

hiev

emen

t lev

el a

re :

1. T

otal

recy

cle

rate

to

the

Mun

icip

al S

olid

Was

te (M

SW) g

ener

atio

n am

ount

in L

auto

ka C

ity a

nd N

adi

Tow

n w

ill b

e 19

.7%

and

20.4

% re

spec

tivel

y by

the

end

of th

e Pr

ojec

t.2.

Dis

posa

l rat

e to

the

MSW

gen

erat

ion

amou

nt in

Lau

toka

City

and

Nad

i Tow

n w

ill d

ecre

ase

by 4

.4%

and

17.1

% re

spec

tivel

y fr

om 2

008’

s b

y th

e en

d of

the

Proj

ect.

3. D

OE

hold

s se

min

ars

to e

xpla

in th

e gu

idel

ines

and

man

uals

targ

etin

g m

ore

than

hal

f of t

hem

unic

ipal

ities

in F

iji w

hich

pro

vide

was

te c

olle

ctio

n se

rvic

es.

Very

diff

icul

tto

ach

ieve

som

ewha

tdi

ffic

ult t

oac

hiev

e

Mor

e or

less

will

be

achi

eved

Will

be

achi

eved

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

2.1.

2 W

hat k

ind

of c

hang

e ha

ve y

ou o

bser

ved

in D

OE

/ LC

C/ N

TC a

s an

org

aniz

atio

n si

nce

this

Proj

ect s

tart

ed?

(ex.

Wor

king

pro

cess

, dec

isio

n m

akin

g pr

oces

s, te

am e

ffor

ts, e

tc.)

2.1.

3 W

hat k

ind

of c

hang

e ha

ve y

ou e

xper

ienc

ed in

you

rsel

f sin

ce th

is P

roje

ct s

tart

ed?

2.2.

1.1

Are

you

satis

fied

with

the

curr

ent l

evel

of a

chie

vem

ent o

f Out

put 1

?N

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

satis

fied

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

2.2.

1.2

If yo

u an

swer

ed, "

mor

e or

less

" or

"ver

y m

uch"

, wha

t do

you

thin

k ha

s br

ough

t suc

hgo

od r

esul

ts?

If y

ou a

nsw

ered

, "ra

rely

" or

"not

at a

ll", w

hat a

re th

e ch

alle

nges

for

furt

her

impr

ovem

ent?

Chal

leng

es a

head

:

2.2.

2.1

Are

you

satis

fied

with

the

curr

ent l

evel

of a

chie

vem

ent o

f Out

put 2

?N

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

satis

fied

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

2.2.

2.2

If yo

u an

swer

ed, "

mor

e or

less

" or

"ver

y m

uch"

, wha

t do

you

thin

k ha

s br

ough

t suc

hgo

od r

esul

ts?

If y

ou a

nsw

ered

, "ra

rely

" or

"not

at a

ll", w

hat a

re th

e ch

alle

nges

for

furt

her

impr

ovem

ent?

Chal

leng

es a

head

:

2.2.

3.1

Are

you

satis

fied

with

the

curr

ent l

evel

of a

chie

vem

ent o

f Out

put 3

?N

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

satis

fied

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

2.2.

3.2

If yo

u an

swer

ed, "

mor

e or

less

" or

"ver

y m

uch"

, wha

t do

you

thin

k ha

s br

ough

t suc

hgo

od r

esul

ts?

If yo

u an

swer

ed, "

rare

ly" o

r "n

ot a

t all"

, wha

t are

the

chal

leng

es fo

r fu

rthe

rim

prov

emen

t?

Chal

leng

es a

head

:

2.2.

4.1

Are

you

satis

fied

with

the

curr

ent l

evel

of a

chie

vem

ent o

f Out

put 4

?N

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

satis

fied

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

2.2.

4.2

If yo

u an

swer

ed, "

mor

e or

less

" or

"ver

y m

uch"

, wha

t do

you

thin

k ha

s br

ough

t suc

hgo

od r

esul

ts?

If y

ou a

nsw

ered

, "ra

rely

" or

"not

at a

ll", w

hat a

re th

e ch

alle

nges

for

furt

her

impr

ovem

ent?

Chal

leng

es a

head

:

2. E

FFEC

TIVE

NES

S

Plea

se s

peci

fy th

e ac

tiviti

es o

f Out

puts

you

are

eng

aged

in:

2.2.

1 F

or th

ose

who

are

in O

utpu

t 1 -

"1. S

olid

Was

te M

anag

emen

t Mas

ter

Plan

s fo

cusi

ng o

n 3R

are

dev

elop

ed r

espe

ctiv

ely

in L

auto

ka C

ity a

nd N

adi T

own

resp

ectiv

ely.

."

Out

put 1

Out

put 2

2.1

Deg

ree

ofac

hiev

emen

t of p

roje

ctpu

rpos

e

Reas

ons

of g

ood

resu

lts:

Out

put 4

Reas

ons

of g

ood

resu

lts:

Reas

ons

of g

ood

resu

lts:

Reas

ons

of g

ood

resu

lts:

1. R

ELEV

ANCE

1.0

Japa

nese

tech

nica

lad

vant

ages

2.2.

12.

2.5

To w

hat e

xten

t has

eac

hO

utpu

t con

trib

uted

toth

e ac

hiev

emen

t of t

hepr

ojec

t pur

pose

?

Out

put 3

2.2.

2 F

or th

ose

who

are

in O

utpu

t 2 -

"2. L

auto

ka C

ity a

nd N

adi T

own

obta

in th

e ca

paci

ty fo

r pr

oper

Sol

id W

aste

Man

agem

ent (

SWM

) thr

ough

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

Pilo

t pro

ject

s."

2.2.

3 F

or th

ose

who

are

in O

utpu

t 3 -

"3. L

auto

ka C

ity a

nd N

adi T

own

obta

in th

e ca

paci

ty fo

r 3R

pro

mot

ion

activ

ities

at w

hole

are

a of

Lau

toka

City

and

Nad

i Tow

n."

2.2.

4 F

or th

ose

who

are

in O

utpu

t 4 -

"4. A

war

enes

s of

res

iden

ts in

Lau

toka

City

and

Nad

i Tow

n is

rai

sed

thro

ugh

impl

emen

tatio

n of

env

ironm

enta

l edu

catio

n ac

tiviti

es o

n 3R

pro

mot

ion.

"

－145－

QUE

STIO

NS

SUB-

QUE

STIO

NS

12

34

0RE

ASO

N(S

) / C

OM

MEN

TSa.

The

num

ber

of e

xper

tsN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

b. T

imel

ines

s of

dis

patc

hing

exp

erts

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

c. L

engt

h of

ass

ignm

ent o

f exp

erts

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

d.Fi

elds

of e

xper

ts (t

echn

ical

exp

ertis

e,co

mm

unic

atio

n sk

ills)

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

a. T

he n

umbe

r of

sta

ffN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

b. L

engt

h of

ass

ignm

ent o

f exp

erts

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

c. te

chni

cal e

xper

tise,

com

mun

icat

ion

skill

sN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

a. T

he n

umbe

r of

trai

nees

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

b. T

imel

ines

sN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

c.Fi

elds

of t

rain

ing

(Cou

rse

cont

ent)

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

a. Q

uant

ityN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

b. Q

ualit

yN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

c. T

imel

ines

s of

pro

visi

onN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

d. T

ype

/ ki

nds

of e

quip

men

tN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

e. C

osts

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

a. T

imel

ines

sN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

b. A

mou

nt o

f sup

port

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

a. T

he n

umbe

r of

CPs

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

b. T

imel

ines

s of

allo

catio

nN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

c. P

rofe

ssio

nal F

ield

s of

CPs

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

a. F

acili

ties

(Exp

erts

Roo

m)

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

b. E

quip

men

t and

Sup

plie

sN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

a. A

mou

ntN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

b. T

imel

ines

s of

dis

burs

emen

tN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

a. F

requ

ency

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

b. T

imel

ines

sN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

c. N

umbe

r of

par

ticip

ants

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

d. E

ffec

tiven

ess

of m

anag

emen

tN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

a. F

requ

ency

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

b. T

imel

ines

sN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

c. N

umbe

r of

par

ticip

ants

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

d. E

ffec

tiven

ess

of m

anag

emen

tN

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

o ju

dge

3.3.

3 If

you

have

any

sugg

estio

ns /

req

uest

to fu

rthe

rim

prov

e th

e pr

ojec

tm

anag

emen

t, pl

ease

exp

lain

/

3 .3.

Has

the

proj

ect s

uppo

rtsy

stem

(pro

ject

man

agem

ent)

func

tione

d w

ell?

3. E

FFIC

IEN

CY:

3.1

Has

the

Japa

nese

inpu

tbe

en a

ppro

pria

tepr

ovid

ing.

.

3.2

Has

the

Fiji

inpu

t bee

nap

prop

riate

prov

idin

g ..

3.1.

1 JI

CA e

xper

ts in

term

s of

3.1.

3 C

P tr

aini

ngs

(Tra

inin

g in

Japa

n, in

Sam

oa e

tc.)

in te

rms

of

3.1.

2 O

ther

Pro

ject

Sta

ff s

uch

aspr

ojec

t coo

rdin

ator

, loc

al s

taff

in th

e pr

ojec

t in

term

s of

3.1.

4 Eq

uipm

ent i

n te

rms

of

3.3.

2 H

as th

e w

eekl

y m

eetin

gbe

en fu

nctio

ned

wel

l in

term

s of

3.3.

1 H

as th

e Jo

int C

oord

inat

ing

Com

mitt

ee fu

nctio

ned

wel

l in

term

s of

3.1.

5 L

ocal

cos

t sup

port

inte

rms

of

3.2.

1 A

lloca

tion

of C

Ps o

f Fiji

inte

rms

of

3.2.

2 Fa

cilit

ies

/ Eq

uipm

ent i

nte

rms

of

3.2.

3 O

pera

tiona

l Cos

ts in

term

sof

－146－

QUE

STIO

NS

SUB-

QUE

STIO

NS

12

34

0RE

ASO

N(S

) / C

omm

ents

Very

diff

icul

tto

ach

ieve

som

ewha

tdi

ffic

ult t

oac

hiev

e

Mor

e or

less

will

be

achi

eved

Will

be

achi

eved

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

4.2

Posi

tive

Impa

ct4.

3.1

Are

ther

e an

y go

od, p

refe

rabl

e si

tuat

ions

pro

duce

d by

the

proj

ect,

such

as

in te

rms

of p

olic

y an

d st

rate

gy, l

ivin

gco

nditi

on fo

r th

e co

mm

unity

peo

ple,

etc

.?

4.3.

1Ar

e th

ere

any

nega

tive

situ

atio

ns p

rodu

ced

by th

epr

ojec

t, su

ch a

s in

term

s of

pol

icy

and

stra

tegy

, liv

ing

cond

ition

for

the

com

mun

ity p

eopl

e, e

tc?

4.3.

2H

ow h

ave

you

cope

d w

ith s

uch

nega

tive

situ

atio

n

QUE

STIO

NS

SUB-

QUE

STIO

NS

12

34

0RE

ASO

N(S

) / C

OM

MEN

TS5.

1.1

Is th

e G

over

nmen

t of F

iji li

kely

to s

uppo

rt th

epr

omot

ion

of 3

R?N

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

oju

dge

5.1.

2 Is

the

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Fiji

like

ly to

sup

port

DO

E /

LCC

/N

TC to

pro

mot

e 3R

to o

ther

wes

tern

div

isio

n of

Fiji

Isla

nds?

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

5.1.

3 D

o yo

u th

ink

that

DO

E /

LCC/

NTC

can

inde

pend

ently

man

age

to p

rom

ote

3R a

fter

the

Japa

nese

ass

ista

nce

iste

rmin

ated

?N

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

oju

dge

5.2

Fina

ncia

lSu

stai

nabi

lity

5.2.

1 Is

the

Gov

ernm

ent o

f Fiji

like

ly to

con

tinue

sup

port

ing

DO

E /

LCC

/ N

TC to

allo

cate

the

suff

icie

nt o

pera

tiona

lbu

dget

for

3R p

rom

otio

n?N

ot a

t all

Rare

lyM

ore

or le

ssVe

ry m

uch

soD

iffic

ult t

oju

dge

5.3.

1 Is

the

tran

sfer

red

tech

nolo

gy b

y th

e Pr

ojec

t pro

perly

mai

ntai

ned

and

utili

zed?

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e5.

3.2

Are

the

faci

litie

s an

d eq

uipm

ent w

ell m

aint

aine

d by

DO

E /

LCC/

NTC

by

them

selv

es?

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e

5.4

Soci

al F

acto

rs5.

4.1.

Do

you

thin

k th

at th

e co

mm

uniti

es w

ill c

ontin

ue to

supp

ort t

he 3

R pr

omot

ion

activ

ities

by

LCC

/ N

TC?

Not

at a

llRa

rely

Mor

e or

less

Very

muc

h so

Diff

icul

t to

judg

e5.

5.1

Wha

t will

be

the

influ

entia

l fac

tors

to s

usta

in th

epr

ojec

t im

pact

aft

er th

e te

rmin

atio

n of

the

proj

ect?

5.5.

2 W

hat w

ill b

e th

e in

fluen

tial f

acto

rs to

dim

inis

h th

epr

ojec

t im

pact

aft

er th

e te

rmin

atio

n of

the

proj

ect?

4 . IM

PACT

:

5.5

Impo

rtan

t fac

tors

influ

enci

ngsu

stai

nabi

litie

s

Ove

rall

Com

men

ts

5.SU

STAI

NAB

ILIT

Y:

5.3

Tech

nica

lSu

stai

nabi

lity

5.1

Org

aniz

atio

nal

Sust

aina

bilit

y

4.1

Achi

evem

ent o

f Ove

rall

Goa

l4.

1.1.

Do

you

thin

k th

at th

e O

vera

ll G

oal [

3R (R

educ

e, R

euse

, Rec

ycle

/Ret

urn)

ispr

ogre

ssed

in F

iji, m

ainl

y in

Wes

tern

Div

isio

n.] i

s lik

ely

to b

e ac

hiev

ed in

3 -

5 ye

ars

afte

r th

e Pr

ojec

t is

term

inat

ed (2

015

201

8)?

4.3

Neg

ativ

e Im

pact

If yo

u ha

ve a

ny a

dditi

onal

com

men

ts o

n th

e Pr

ojec

t or

com

men

ts o

n M

id-t

erm

Rev

iew

, ple

ase

feel

free

to w

rite

here

.Th

ank

you

so m

uch

for

your

coo

pera

tion.

－147－

10．参考資料リスト