1 chapter 7 dyadic relationships, followership, and delegation lussier, r. and achau, c. (2007):...

33
1 Chapter Chapter 7 7 Dyadic Dyadic Relationships, Relationships, Followership, Followership, and and Delegation Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Upload: kevin-nichols

Post on 11-Jan-2016

263 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

1

Chapter 7Chapter 7

Dyadic Relationships,Dyadic Relationships,Followership, and Followership, and

DelegationDelegation

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 2: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

2

Summary of Lecture 13 &14

Differences between behavioral and contingency leadershiptheories.

Contingency leadership variables and styles.

Leadership models:

Prescriptive and Descriptive leadership models

Leadership continuum model

House Path-goal leadership model

Substitutes for leadership variables

The Normative Decision Model

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 3: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

3

Learning Objectives

4 Stages of development / dyadic approach.

Vertical linkage model relationships.

Team building view / dyadic approach.

Systems and networks view / dyadic approach.

Cycle leading to Pygmalion effect.

3 Follower influencing characteristics.

5 Things a leader should delegate.

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 4: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

4

The personalized and individualized relationship between a leader and each

follower in a work unit

DyadicDyadic

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 5: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

5

Explains why leaders vary their behavior with different followers.

If ask follower about leader they will represent different opinion

Central theme: Support for self worth

Dyadic TheoryDyadic Theory

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 6: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

6

Dyadic Theory TrendsDyadic Theory Trends

Size expands from 1-on-1 to a network between leader and followers, over time

Quality of each dyad affects performance

Quality of expanded relationships enhances organizational performance

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 7: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

7

Individualized leader-subordinateinteractions creating in-groups and

out-groups.

Focus is on quality of each dyad (Quality of relationship)

and its effects on organizationaloutcomes over time.

Leaderships can aspire to build positive relationships with all

subordinates, not just chosen few.

Create positive dyadic relationships across traditional boundaries

to include a larger network.

Vertical Dyadic Linkage Theory

Leader-Member Exchange (LMX)

Team Building

Systems and Networks

Dyadic Approach: Dyadic Approach: Stages of DevelopmentStages of Development

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 8: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

8

Vertical Dyadic Linkage (VDL) Theory)

Leader treats all followers in same way (ALS)

Leader treats different follower differently (VDL)

VDL focus on identification of how leader develop one to one relationship with followers and how it creates in groups and out groups

Dyad relationship may develop at informal level or formal levelThe selective relationship may lead to in group and out groups

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 9: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

9

• In-groupIn-group ... ... those subordinates with strong social ties to their leader in a people-oriented style.

• Out-groupOut-group...those subordinates with little or no social ties to their leader, strictly task-oriented relationship and top down influence.

Vertical Dyad Linkage (VDL) TheoryVertical Dyad Linkage (VDL) TheoryAttempts to understand how leaders create in-Attempts to understand how leaders create in-

groups and out-groupsgroups and out-groups

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 10: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

10

In GroupsIn Groups

Close circle of leaderPeople-oriented relationshipHigh mutual trustHigh exchangeTwo-way loyaltyMutual influenceSpecial favors from leaderHigh attention, support, guidance and feedback from leader

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 11: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

11

In GroupsIn Groups

Followers in return perform their task with commitment

Give higher performance

Highly motivated

Leader use expert, referent and reward power to influence

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 12: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

12

Out GroupsOut Groups

Distant group

Task-oriented relationship

Low exchange

Lack of trust

Not much loyalty

Little or no mutual influence

Expect to follow command and comply with work standards (managed based on employment contract)

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 13: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

13

LMX TheoryLMX Theory

Assumption of LMX theory

Leaders or supervisors have limited time, resources, attention, discretion and energy so he use this selectively among followers

Leaders have different quality relationship with different followers

High quality LMX (more support, reward power, inovlement in decision making)

Low quality LMX (low consideration, formal supervision, less support, coercive influence, compliance, authoritative behavior, lesser involvement in decision

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 14: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

14

LMX TheoryLMX Theory

LXM is defines as the quality of the exchange relationship between an employee and his or her boss

Quality of leader-follower relationship is more predictive of individual and organizational productivity then trait and behavior of leader

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 15: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

15

Why should a leader bother to try to Why should a leader bother to try to establish effective dyadic relationship establish effective dyadic relationship

with Out Groups?with Out Groups?

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 16: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

16

Dyadic TheoryDyadic TheoryTeam BuildingTeam Building

Effective leaders should aspire to establish relationships with all members, not just a few special individuals.

Out Groups are significantly less productive.

In-group and out-group have strong social ties and share information with each other

Out group circle feel biasLussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 17: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

17

How do How do DyadicDyadic Leader-Follower Leader-Follower Relationships Develop over Time?Relationships Develop over Time?

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 18: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

18

LMX Life Cycle ModelLMX Life Cycle Model

Stage 1: Leader & follower conduct themselves as strangers

- Testing acceptable behavior- Negotiating the relationships- Involves: » Impression Management» Ingratiation

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 19: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

19

Impressions ManagementImpressions Management

A follower’s effort to project a favorable image in order to gain an immediate benefit or improve long-term relationships with the leaderA leader’s attempt to project a sense to the followers that he/she is confident and competent

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 20: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

20

IngratiationIngratiation

The follower’s effort to appear supportive, appreciative, and respectfulThe leader’s effort to appear as one of the “good guys” to work for

What is Stage 2 (LMX Life Cycle)

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 21: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

21

LMX Life Cycle ModelLMX Life Cycle Model

Stage 2: Leader & follower become acquaintedFurther refine their rolesMutual trust, loyalty, & respect developRelationships that do not move beyond Stage 1 tend to deteriorate

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 22: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

22

LMX Life Cycle ModelLMX Life Cycle Model

Stage 3: Roles reach maturityMutual commitment to organization

In-group / Out-group level

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 23: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

23

The influence of LMX on follower behaviorThe influence of LMX on follower behavior

If leader and follower possess similar attributes and perception it create positive impact of relationship and productivity

High quality LMX relationship results in more satisfied human resources, low turn over, high performance and promote healthy work environment

LMX relationship bridge gap between individual values and organizational value

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 24: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

24

Dyadic ApproachDyadic ApproachSystems & Network ViewSystems & Network View

Leader relationships are not limited to employees, but include peers, customers,

suppliers, and other relevant stakeholders in the broader community.

Organization is system of interrelated parts. Effective leader need to develop effective relationship with other groups and external members to gain support and resources

Leader need to bring group members together through creation of networks so they reflect together and represent each other with in department and before other departments

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 25: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

25

What are the characteristics of High What are the characteristics of High Quality LMX Relationships?Quality LMX Relationships?

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 26: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

26

High Quality LMX RelationshipsHigh Quality LMX Relationships

Characterized by greater levels of loyalty, commitment, respect, affection, mutual trust, and possibly mutual liking between leaders and members

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 27: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

27

LMX ScaleLMX Scale

Attempts to understand the quality of each dyadic relationship & its effects on organizational outcomes over timeIs the most commonly used instrument for defining and measuring the quality of relationships

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 28: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

28

What must exist for high quality LMX to What must exist for high quality LMX to develop?develop?

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 29: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

29

Followers’ attitudes

Situational factors

Leader and follower perceptions and behaviors

High-Quality LMX RelationshipsHigh-Quality LMX Relationships

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 30: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

30

When is a favorable LMX relationship When is a favorable LMX relationship likely to exist? likely to exist?

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 31: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

31

Favorable LMX relationshipFavorable LMX relationship

The subordinate is perceived to be competent & dependableIf the follower’s attitudes are similar to the leader’sA little self promotion never hurtsEffort to appear competent and dependablePositive perception about follower

Try out: Manager ask something to do extra work than job requirements? Response1: Oh No, Response 2: Yes I am glad to do so.

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 32: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

32

Discussion Question 1: What are the differences between

in-groups and out-groups?

Discussion Question 2: How do quality leader-member exchange relationships influence follower behavior?

Discussion Question 3: How does a leader’s first impression and perception of a follower influence the quality of their relationship?

Discussion Question 4: What are characteristics of quality LMX relationship?

Discussion Question 5: How can a follower’s perception or attribution of a leader influence their relationship?

Discussion Questions

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning

Page 33: 1 Chapter 7 Dyadic Relationships, Followership, and Delegation Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3 rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage

33

Summary

4 Stages of development / dyadic approach.

Vertical linkage model relationships.

Team building view / dyadic approach.

Systems and networks view / dyadic approach.

Cycle leading to Pygmalion effect.

3 Follower influencing characteristics.

5 Things a leader should delegate.

Lussier, R. and Achau, C. (2007): Effective Leadership, 3rd Edition, South-Western, Cangage Learning