1 commercial experience of metal passivator additive and performance benefits
TRANSCRIPT
1
COMMERCIAL EXPERIENCE OF METAL PASSIVATOR ADDITIVE
AND PERFORMANCE BENEFITS
2
Introduction
FCC/RFCC CATALYST 1913, Thermal cracking of oils-free radical mechanism 1915, AlCl3 based cracking catalyst (Mc Afee) 1928, Houdry: solid/acid treated clay/ alumina based catalyst 1940, First synthetic silica-alumina catalyst 1948, Commercial production of microspheroidal FCC catalyst
(Davison) 1962, Zeolite cracking catalyst 1974, CO-promoter 1975, Ni passivation, 1978, Vanadium passivation 1986, ZSM-5 based octane additive
FCC HARDDWARE 1936, First fixed bed commercial cracking unit 1942, First commercial FCC unit (Standarad Oil) 1943, First commercial Thermofor catalytic cracking (TCC) 1956, First riser cracking unit (Shell Oil) 1971, Short contact riser (Kellog)
3
Introduction cont….
FCC/RFCC is flexible process Loading/unloading and switch over of catalyst/
additive Addition of catalyst / additive can be varied optimally
as per the unit requirement.
Performance of catalyst depends upon Process condition Feed properties Unit constraint change Product value change Product quality requirements
4
Challenges in processing of resid feeds
Resid feeds High metal content, 3-15 ppm Ni and 10-30 ppm V, in
the form naphthenates, porphyrins Higher sulphur content, 1.5-3 wt% Higher basic nitrogen, 500-1500 ppm CCR, 1-6 wt%
Other issues Statutory requirement on products and effluent Limited catalyst suppliers, short supply of key
component and rising cost
5
Challenges in processing resid feeds in RFCCU
Rx
Rg490-550 OC
5 Sec
650-720OC
Hardware limitation•Regenerator metallurgy•Combustion Air•Cyclone efficiency•Wet gas compressor
Catalyst•High V tolerance•Low coke make•Higher thermal and hydrothermal•Higher attrition resistance with high zeolite content
6
Vanadium deactivation mechanism
V-Porphyrins FCC catalyst
in feed (V+3, V+5) +
Reactor - reducing environment
V on catalyst surface with coke
Regenerator + O2
V2O5 (V+4, V+5)on surface Mobile (VO(OH)3, V+5) Fresh catalystOld catalyst
Particle to particle migration
RE Vanadates, zeolite destruction
+ Rare Earth in Zeolite
Steam
7
FCC catalyst particles with contaminate metals
Alumina/silica alumina
RE-Y zeolite
3 micron
Binder : silica
Clay
V
Ni
8
4 complete sodalite cages/UC6 half sodalite cages/UC8 one eighth sodalite cages/UC
Structure of faujasite (Y) type zeolite
9
Effect of metals on SA, feed rate, CCR and coke*CCR/feed rate based on model
Coke
Only option, replace with fresh catalyst
10
Options to combat Ni & V poisoning Addition of fresh catalyst
Most common method, costly for higher catalyst consumption
Feed hydrotreatment Attractive - many advantages, higher capital & operating costs Use of metal tolerant catalysts Difficult to balance between metal tolerance, activity &
selectivity and cost Chemical demetallization-DEMET
Sulfidation followed by chlorination-High cost technology
Magnetic separation-Magnacat Requires large capital, difficult to remove vanadium
Use of liquid passivators & solid additives
11
Type of metal passivator / trap additive
Ni passivator (liquid emulsions)AntimonyBismuthCerium
V-Trap additive (solid/liquid)Rare earthMgO/AluminaTin
FCC AdditivesFCC Additives
12
IndVi: Additive for simultaneous passivation of Ni & V
ABD: 0.78-0.91 gm/cc, AI < 4, SA: 60-70 m2/gm, APS: 85-100 micronDosage : 1-10 wt%
13
Laboratory testing
Metal deactivation protocol
Blending 5 wt% additive with base catalystMetal doping (Ni-2500 & V-6852)-Mitchell methodSingle step H2 reductionHydrothermal deactivation at 788 deg.C/3hrsMeasurement of physico- chemical propertiesPerformance evaluation – ACE R+ unit
14
Impact of IndVi on physical properties & Coke
Surface area, m2/gm
X-ray crysallinity
Fresh Metal doped -
Steamed
Fresh Metal doped -
Steamed
Base catalyst
263 96 23.4 5.4
Base catalyst + 5 % additive *
258 110 20.3 7.08
* Metal passivator surface area 66 m2/gm
5 wt% IndVi, reduced coke from 1 to 1.9 wt% for cat/oil ranging from 3.3 to 5.6
15
Typical feed properties
Refinery HR
Density, g/cc 0.94
Sulfur, wt% 3.6
CCR, wt% 4.1
Total nitrogen, ppm 1294
Na, ppm 0.38
Fe , ppm 0.72
V , ppm 22
Ni , ppm 7
Mean average BP, C 460
Aromatics, wt% 61
Saturates, wt% 39
16
Predicted plant performance yield
Reference Base case(RFCC Catalyst +
5 wt% ZSM-5 additive)
Base case + 5 wt% IndVi
Delta Yield
Yield , Wt% A B A-B
Drygas 4.77 4.53 -0.24
LPG 17.43 19.09 1.66
Gasoline 29.07 28.14 -0.93
Heavy Naphtha 9.73 10.78 1.05
Light Cycle Oil 22.61 23.35 0.74
Clarified Oil 9.28 7.11 -2.17
Coke 7.11 7.08 -0.03
-216 Conversion 68.11 69.52 1.41
Fresh feed rate M3/hr 99.16 99.16
Recycle, M3/hr 9.41 9.41
ROT, 0C 510 510
Dense bed temperature, 0CRG1/RG2
686/741 676/730 -10
CCR, MT/hr 453 474
Cat/Oil 4.94 5.17
17
Predicted plant performance yield – Increasing t’put
Reference Base case(RFCC Catalyst +
5 wt% ZSM-5 additive)
Base case+ 5 wt% IndVi
Delta Yield
Yield , Wt% C D C-D
Drygas 4.26 4.02 -0.24
LPG 14.32 15.93 1.61
Gasoline 28.75 27.88 -0.87
Heavy Naphtha 9.67 10.73 1.06
Light Cycle Oil 24.05 24.8 0.75
Clarified Oil 11.96 9.77 -2.19
Coke 7 6.87 -0.03
-216 Conversion 64 65.43 1.43
Fresh feed rate M3/hr 110.16 110.16
Recycle, M3/hr 9.41 9.41
ROT, 0C 505 505
Dense bed temperature, 0CRG1/RG2
689/752 679/740
CCR, MT/hr 459 482
Cat/Oil 4.3 4.5
18
Commercial production
Toll manufacturing at SCIL
Manufactured 12 MT IndVi additive for plant trial in M/s SCIL
facilities.
Physico-chemical characteristics of commercial lot match with
laboratory catalysts.
Properties Typical specifications
Surface area (m2/gm) 60-70
Na2O, wt% 0.2 max
ABD (gm/cc) 0.86-0.94
Attrition Index Less than 5
LOI Less than 5
APS, microns 85-100
19
Addition rates during IndVi plant trial
20
Commercial trialAttribute Unit Base Case IndVi Trial run Delta values
Total fresh feed rate m3/hr 105.6 109.3 3.7VR rate m3/hr 4.6 7.8 3.2
Feed CCR wt% 2.15 2.91 0.76
VB Naphtha + Wild Naphtha m3/hr 2.9 2.9 0
COT oC 220 217 -3ROT oC 510 510 0
Fresh Catalyst addition rate MT/day 4.0 3.8 -
ZSM-5 addition rate Kg/day 100 - -
IndVi addition rate Kg/day - 200 -
RG-1 dense bed Temperature oC 677 670 -7
RG-2 dense bed Temperature oC 726 727 +1
Yields (Cut point corrected)
Acid gas + Dry Gas wt% 4.06 4.10 +0.04
LPG wt% 12.61 12.22 -0.39
LCN (C5-150oC) wt% 34.83 31.91 -2.92
HCN(150-220oC) wt% 9.78 12.21 +2.43
LCO (220-370oC) wt% 22.31 22.85 +0.54
TCO (150-370oC) wt% 32.09 35.06 2.97
DCO (370oC+) wt% 11.35 11.82 +0.47
Coke wt% 5.06 4.89 -0.17
21
Commercial trial cont..
PLANT TRIAL – RFCCU
Plant trial run of IndVi additive was conducted in RFCCU for 20 days
with 4.5% additive concentration. During the PGTR, ZSM-5 was
added to the system @ 100 kg/day along with fresh catalyst addition
rate of 4 MT/hr.
Around ~3 wt% TCO yield increased with more or less corresponding
decrease in gasoline yield. Reduction in gasoline yield and increase in
TCO yield in line with the current Refinery objective.
VR addition rate was increased by 3.2 m3/hr during the trial run due
to increased available cushion in regenerator dense bed temperature.
Even with higher VR rate, RG1 dense bed temperature was lower by 7 oC compared to base case.
22
Conclusion
Ni & V are the prominent metals accumulating on catalyst which reduce
crystallinity, SA and activity and increases coke & dry gas yield.
IndVi additive developed & Commercialized by IOCL is capable of
simultaneous passivation of both vanadium and nickel.
Presence of additive in RFCC unit, helps in retaining higher surface area and
crystallinity.
Predicted plant performance yield based on laboratory data showed
reduction in bottom and increase in distillate yields.
Commercial plant trial of IndVi at HR RFCC unit showed:
Enhanced t’put containing higher VR
Enhanced TCO yield
Lower regenerator-1 dense bed temperature (by 7oC) at higher t’put,
Comparable CLO yield similar to base case
23
The Authors acknowledge the contribution of followings towards successful commercial plant trial
mr g. saidulu
dr v.chidambaram
mr balaiah swam
Mr.S.p.Choudhury
dr.m.b.patel
dr.j.christopher
mr.somnath kukkade
mr. manoj kumar yadav
ms. Soma chattopadhyay
Ms sangeeta Purkaystha
Mr sujit dasgupta
24
Thank You
25
Backup Slides
26
Effect of CCR on plant
27
Effect of Metals (Ni + V), on MAT Activity
28
Effect of Metals (Ni + V), on SA
2929
Deactivation of surface area with different metals
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0 5000 10000 15000
Su
rfac
e ar
ea,m
2 /g
Metals, ppm
Deactivation of surface area with different metal
V
Na
Fe
Ni
30
COMMERCIAL TRIAL Cont..
3131
Feed propertiesRefinery HR(actual) Jan, 09 feed, HR PR, 08
Density, g/cc
0.9391 0.921 0.866
Sulfur, wt% 3.59 2.8 0.713
CCR, wt% 4.06 2.64 1.5
Total nitrogen, ppm 1294 - 337
Na, ppm 0.38 -
Fe , ppm 0.72 -
V , ppm 21.53 34 16
Ni , ppm 6.9 3.2 6
Mean average BP, C 458 469
Aromatics, wt% 61.3 82.9
Saturates, wt% 38.7 17.1
Viscosity 104
3232
Catalyst deactivation- chemistry
1. V deposits on catalyst surface along with coke 2. V2O5 generates in oxidative environment
4 V + 5 O2 2 V2O5
3. Vanadium oxide converted in vanadic acid in presence of reducing environment (steam)
V2O5 + 3 H2O 2 VO (OH)3
La2O3 + 2H3VO4 2LaVO4 + 3H2O
Al2O3 + 2H3VO4 2AlVO4+ 3H2O
3333
Properties of Ni on RFCC catalyst
Ni exists under FCC condition as +2 or 0
valance state
Ni is 4 times more active than vanadium and it’s
activity is more predominant with higher
alumina content in catalyst
+2 state of nickel reacts to form NiAl2O4and
NiSiO3 with surface alumina and silica.
NiSiO3 is more stable, SiO2 based binders are
preferred as natural passivators for Ni
3434
V & Ni passivating agents
Ni Passivation Antimony, Bismuth and Cerium based emulsions are in use as additive along
with hydrocarbon feed Natural SiO2 based binder partially mitigates undesired effects Additive catalysts based on Sb, Bi have been in use as blend with base
catalyst Order of passivation-Sb > Bi > Sn > P >Al
V Passivation Tin, Antimony, Titanium, Zirconium and Rare earth based passivators are in
already use for vanadium passivation Alumina based metal trap partially passivates destructive behavior of
vanadium
3535
FCC Unit schematic