1 conformity assessment of standards - the case of methodological standards r. depoutot (insee)...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Conformity assessment of standards
-
The case of methodological standards
R. Depoutot (Insee)
Budapest,
2-3 May 2011
2
Conformity assessment of standards
• Standards define precise agreements consisting in rules, guidelines or characteristics for activities or their results.
• There is a general agreement that the standards:
– Help users of the products or services in providing them with the information that these products/ services are developed - produced according to a standard that guarantees a certain level of quality
– Require some control that there are properly implemented by producers who claim to do so
• CEN or ISO use similar procedures for conformity assessment
• All mandatory EU standards follow the same pattern for conformity assessment, with various degrees in the depth of the assessment (Council decision 93/465/EEC)
3
Assessment defined by decision 93/465
• Mainly for products
• Various types:– “Internal production control” (option: with tests)
– “conformity to type” (option: with several random tests)
– “production quality assurance” (conformity to type + Quality assurance)
– “product quality assurance” (production QA + standard test(s) for each product)
– “product verification” (conformity to type+ independant test of products)
– “unit verification” (each product is tested by independent body)
– “full quality assurance” (audited quality system for design, production, final inspection and testing) - option: “design examination”
4
decision 93/465: “design examination”
• Option of “full quality assurance”:– examination of the design with a single notified body.
– the application must enable the design, manufacture and operation of the product to be understood, and shall enable conformity with the requirements of the directive to be assessed.
– It must include:
• […] the necessary supporting evidence for their adequacy […]. This supporting evidence must include the results of tests carried out by the appropriate laboratory of the manufacturer or on his behalf.
5
Conformity assessment of methodological standards: problem statement
• Eurostat assesses the conformity of some national processes to “methodological standards”:– Code of practice– Gross National Income– Public deficit and debt (Excessive Deficit Procedure)
• Depth of the assessment varies (depends from importance)
• What could be produced in conformity to methodological standards?– Statistical specifications (i.e. an intermediate product + a single unit - no
“production chain”)
• If the ESS production process were integrated, the specifications could be used to:– be implemented independently by each (voluntary?) NSI,
– or be implemented in an IT package made available to each NSI…
6
Conformity assessment of methodological standards: draft proposals
• Two issues:– How to assess the produced specifications?
– By whom?
• How to?– Transpose the methods of decision 93/465
– «internal design control » is possible (self declaration), but …
– «design conformity to type»: random selection of extracts from the whole specification + check for conformity of this sample (in cooperation with authors)
– is quality assurance in design possible? If so, «design quality assurance» could be considered: QA + design conformity to type
7
Conformity assessment of methodological standards: draft proposals
• By whom?– Transpose the methods of decision 93/465:
• «Independent » national bodies • Surveillance, sometimes unexpected visits
– Issues in statistical design:
• Eurostat not bound to any NSI, much interest in good results
• But… not a natural candidate (specifying not its usual activity)
• Cost for community might be higher
• Assessment could be conducted by one NSI with financial incentives