1 in 364.v2003.ppt, 13.10.2015 ant, complexity and systems development eric monteiro ntnu and univ....
TRANSCRIPT
1IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
ANT, complexity and systems development
Eric Monteiro
NTNU and Univ. of Oslo
IN364 March 2003
2IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Contents
• ”Organizational issues” – where are they?
• ANT – notions, illustrations – and critique
• Key lessons and issues
3IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
”Implementation”
• Specified
• Coded
• Tested
• Prototyped
• A few users
• Pockets of use, ad hoc
• Everyone using it
• Everyone, for important things
4IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
”Using an IS”
• Seen it
• Touched it
• Occasionally
• For selected tasks, not for everything
• Often
• routinely
5IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Examples
”Two and a half million Norwegians use the Internet every month”(Gallup, November 2002)
ATM - - Cinema - - Flight check in - - c2b - - …
6IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Organizational politics
• groups
• Agendas
• Interests
• Conflict, not harmony, is the rule
7IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Interpretative flexibility
M Tue W Th F
8 - 9
9 - 10
10 - 11
11 - 12
12 - 13
10IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
ANT: Basic moves
• Our world is full of technology
• The end, not the means
• Same role => same explanation
• Reductionist? Vulgar? Anti-humanistic?
11IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Appropriating ANT
• Social science => ICT– A GENUINE interest in the technology
• Backward gazing => design– Only after the dust has settled...
• Details => basic notions– Unstable, keeps changing
12IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Inscriptions
• WHO inscribes
• WHAT is inscribed (which scenario)
• HOW is it inscribed (the material)
• STRENGTH of an inscription - does it succeed?
13IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
”Benefits” – for whom??
• Calenders…..
• Benefits = those CALLING meetings
• Additional work = those BEING called
• Ex.: Internet banking ?
14IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Individual cooperative work
• Lotus Notes in Alfa Corporation
• ”sharing experience” – projects, customers
• (implicit) structures of incentives
15IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Ex.: Lotus Notes in Statoil (1992- )
1994 1996 1998
20.000
10.000
5.000
17IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Irreversibility
• Irreversibilitet - measuring how well-aligned
the actor-network is– How difficult it is to undo an earlier inscription
– To what extent future action is determined
19IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Standardization (I)
• Imposed - emergent ?– Ex.: ISO vs. Internet
• Irreversibility?– Ex.: QWERTY
• Key dilemma:
Keep stable Change
20IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Problem areas
• ”Actant”
• Only micro studies
• ”Flat” actors
• Centered, drifting
• A grand theory of everything
• Design = intervention, not from scratch
21IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Purity and danger
• strong, rhetorical device!
• socially constructed (M Douglas)
• danger = impurity = fragmentation
• ”Infrastructures are clean - tidy, uniform”
22IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Fragmentation = dirt
“[W]e risk that the company’s information and access get fragmented (...) The Intranet market is highly fragmented today, with a number of strong competitors fighting each other with technological as well as political means. (...) For the non-specialist, this creates the impression that Intranet technology is cheap, but it is of key importance to recognise that the Intranet technology of today has it price — they require an effort to be integrated with the existing infrastructure of the company”((SData K/RD21, IT challenges and trends 1996 - 1999)
23IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Actant
• Just a fake? A play with words?
• Who interpretes the actants?
• Reasonable interpretations
• Unsolvable problem!
24IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Only micro?
• what about larger structures
• Institutions?
• ”move up and down!” (Callon, Latour 1986)
26IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Centered
• Goal oriented
• Managerialism
• No drifting
• A mastermind, an origo
27IN 364.v2003.ppt, 19.04.23
Grand theory of everything
• what is NOT an actor-network?– None talks about boudaries - do they exist?
• The neverending networks– The world in your lap
– How to delimit them
– Methodological issues
• ”There is never only one network” (Leigh Star)