1 international telecommunication union overview of deliverable 3 methodology overview of results...
TRANSCRIPT
1International Telecommunication Union
Overview of Deliverable 3Overview of Deliverable 3
MethodologyMethodology
Overview of Results sessionTuesday 24 March 2009
Editor Group of Deliverable 3:
Yoh Somemura (NTT), ChairmanTakeshi Origuchi (NTT), Editor
Yong-Woon KIM (ETRI), Co-editor Gilbert Buty (Alcatel-Lucent), Co-editor
Didier Marquet (France Telecom), Co-editorWillem Vereecken, (Ghent University), Co-editor
Hans-Otto Scheck (Nokia Siemens Networks), Co-editor
2International Telecommunication Union
Scope and Goal of Deliverable 3
The FG should develop a methodology to describe and estimate present and future user energy consumption of ICTs over their entire life-cycle.This should include:• a calculation methodology of energy consumption saved through ICT utilization;• the definition of basic units relevant to the cases considered; • the identification, gathering and processing of relevant parameters (e.g. user behavior);• the principles and tools to measure and evaluate the results;• a list of examples of the uses of how ICTs can replace or displace other energy-consuming technologies/uses;• analysis of existing standards and a proposal for development of new standards, if needed.
Terms of Reference concerning to Deliverable 3
3International Telecommunication Union
Scope and Goal of Deliverable 3
Objective and Goal of D1 (C66 from WG-A Chairman)
Deliverable 3, Methodologies:The scope of this deliverable is to provide a methodology to evaluate the environmental impact of ICTs. By analyzing current methods of environmental assessment, minimum common characteristics among methods are clarified. Items outside the minimum characteristics are also taken into account to establish a common method for evaluating environmental impact of ICTs.
Direction of discussion: Clarification of methodology by analysing current methods of calculation and evaluation, with regard to standardisation of evaluation methodologies for environment impact of ICTs.
4International Telecommunication Union
Table of Contents7.1 Scope7.2 Relevant metrics and Units7.3 Methodologies for ICT impact assessment
7.3.1 Impact of own GHG emissions7.3.1.1 Measurement7.3.1.2 Quantification7.3.1.3 Reporting7.3.1.4 Validation7.3.1.5 Verification
7.3.2 Impact on other sectors7.3.2.1 Measurement7.3.2.2 Quantification7.3.2.3 Reporting7.3.2.4 Validation7.3.2.5 Verification
7.4 Impacts of ICTs on Climate Change7.4.1 ICT-sector GHG emission mitigation
7.4.1.1 Data servers and data centers7.4.1.2 Network equipment
7.4.2 Impact of ICT on other sectors7.4.2.1 Home appliances7.4.2.2 Post7.4.2.3 Transportation
7.5 Parameters potentially influencing adoption of ICT solutions
4International Telecommunication Union
5International Telecommunication Union
7.1 Scope
In this section, we describe the proposed methodology of the Focus Group. The methodologies cover the assessment of the green house gas (GHG) emission of the ICT sector over the entire life cycle of ICT devices. Additionally, we propose methods for increasing the efficiency of the ICT sector and reducing global GHG emission through the adoption of ICTs in other relevant sectors.
6International Telecommunication Union
7.2 Relevant metrics and Units Power unit: 1 W = 1 kg m2 s-3
Energy unit: 1 J = 1 W.s 1 kWh= 3,600,000 J Mass unit: 1 kg or 1 t = 1,000 kg Volume unit: 1 m3 = 1,000 L
(1) Calculate energy consumption reduction through the use of ICTs
(2) Convert into CO2 emissions reduction
Use CO2 emission intensity reflecting the situation in each country.
7International Telecommunication Union
7.3 Methodologies for ICT impact assessment
ICT Society(international/
national/regional level)
ICT Society(international/
national/regional level)
ICT equipmentsICT equipments
ICT services/solutionsICT services/solutions
SMART2020 DTR/EE-00008 (liaised by ETSI-TB-EE)
LCA of ServicesE.g. Direct & indirect impact of Video-conference
LCA of Products Available to perform LCA
Relatively available to perform LCA
Hard to perform LCAMacroscopic Analysis(Input/Output Table analysis) is useful.
LCA is useful to analyze
Layers
Network (NW) InfrastructuresNetwork (NW) InfrastructuresAvailable to perform LCA(Necessity to make model)(Difficulty from Allocation)LCA of Products composed
C43 (Fixed line), C44 (Mobile NW)
8International Telecommunication Union
7.3 Methodologies for ICT impact assessment7.3.1 Impact of own GHG emissions
7.3.1.2 Quantification LCA require to set
Functional Unit System boundary Allocation procedure
LAN switch
Router
LAN switch
Router
DSU
Subscriber module DSLAM OLT
ONUADSL modem
PC PC PC
Access network equipment
Subscriber station
Transfer facility
Internet Service Provider
ISDN ADSL FTTH
Boundary for evaluation
Metallic cable Metallic cable Optical cable
LAN switch
Router
LAN switch
Router
DSU
Subscriber module DSLAM OLT
ONUADSL modem
PCPC PCPC PCPC
Access network equipment
Subscriber station
Transfer facility
Internet Service Provider
ISDN ADSL FTTH
Boundary for evaluation
Metallic cable Metallic cable Optical cable
Case study: LCA of Wired NetworkCase study: LCA of Wired Network
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
ISDN ADSL FTTHCO
2 em
issi
ons
[kg-
CO
2/ye
ar/s
ubsc
ribe
r]
Disposal/recycling
Use
Production
Recovery by recycling
9International Telecommunication Union
7.3 Methodologies for ICT impact assessment7.3.1 Impact of own GHG emissions
7.3.1.2 Quantification LCA require to set
Functional Unit System boundary Allocation procedure
Case study: LCA of Wireless NetworkCase study: LCA of Wireless Network
LS GS TS GS LS
BSMS
CiRCUS
Voice call / videophone
Core network
Tokyo NiigataWPCGWPCG
BS MS
LS GS TS GS LS
BSMS
CiRCUS
Voice call / videophone
Core network
Tokyo NiigataWPCGWPCG
BS MS
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
CO
2 em
issi
ons
[kg-
CO
2/ye
ar/s
ubsc
ribe
r] Use
Production
Disposal/ recycling
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Ene
rgy
cons
umpt
ion[
GJ/
year
/sub
scri
ber]
Use
Production
Disposal/ recycling
10International Telecommunication Union
7.3 Methodologies for ICT impact assessment7.3.2 Impact on other sectors
7.3.2.2 Quantification(1) Consumption of goods (paper, CDs, DVDs, etc.)(Energy reduction) = (Energy consumption to produce one unit of the product) (Amount reduced)(E.g., Reduction of paper: (Energy to produce paper (A4 size, 1 sheet) (J)) (Quantity reduced (Sheets))(2) Power consumption/energy consumption (electricity, gasoline, kerosene, light oil, heavy oil, town gas, etc.) (Energy reduction) = (Unit energy consumption for each type of fuel) (Fuel consumption reduced)(E.g., Reduction of heavy oil: (Energy per litre of heavy oil (J)) (Fuel reduced (L))(3) Movement of people (cars, buses, rail, aircraft, etc.) (Energy reduction) = (Unit energy consumption per traffic volume (passenger-km) for each transportation means) × (Transportation distance reduced (km)) (Number of passengers transported (passenger))(E.g., Reduction of railroad transportation: (Energy consumption per passenger-km (J)) (Transportation distance reduced (km)) (Number of transported passengers reduced (passenger))(4) Movement of goods (mail, trucks, rail cargo, cargo ships, etc.)(Energy reduction) = (Unit energy consumption for each transportation means (J)) (Transportation distance reduced (km)) (E.g., Reduction of the number of mails: (Energy consumption per mail (J)) (Number of mails reduced (mail)) Reduction of truck transportation: (Energy consumption per ton-km (J)) (Transportation distance reduced (km)) (Cargo weight reduced (t))
11International Telecommunication Union
7.3 Methodologies for ICT impact assessment7.3.2 Impact on other sectors
7.3.2.2 Quantification(5) Improved efficiency of office space (electricity, office area, etc.)(Energy reduction) = (Unit energy consumption) (Amount reduced)(E.g., Reduction of office floor area: (Energy consumption per m2 (J)) (Area reduced (m2))(6) Storage of goods (electricity, warehouse area, etc.)(Energy reduction) = (Unit energy consumption) (Amount reduced)(E.g., Reduction of warehouse area: (Energy consumption per m2 (J)) (Area reduced (m2))(7) Improved work efficiency (workload etc.)(Energy reduction) = (Energy consumption per m2 of office (J)) (Area used per person (m2)) (Workload improved (person-year))(8) Waste (Wastepaper, garbage, plastic, industrial wastes, etc.)(Energy reduction) = (Unit energy consumption for each type of waste) (Amount reduced)(E.g., Reduction of wastepaper: (Energy consumption to dispose of 1 kg of wastepaper (J)) (Amount reduced (kg))
12International Telecommunication Union
7.3 Methodologies for ICT impact assessment7.3.2 Impact on other sectors
7.3.2.2 Quantification
Typical CO2 emissions per unit area of office space
Japan USA
13International Telecommunication Union
Operation A1Operational consumption
Investmentconsumption
Sub-system 1
...
Operation B1
DataElectricity
Voice
One end user
Computer
Phone+
AccessElectricity
Transfer
Network
Electricity
ONT…
Fiber…
ProcessingElectricity
Protection
Data center
Electricity
Servers
Firewall…
Example: teleserviceGeneric service
End service or product
ElectricityInvestment
+
Operation AnOperational Investment
Sub-system n
Operation Bn
+Investment
One hour of teleservice per user
Operational
Operational
Sub service
7.3 Methodologies for ICT impact assessment7.3.2 Impact on other sectors
7.3.2.3 Reporting
14International Telecommunication Union
7.3 Methodologies for ICT impact assessment7.3.2 Impact on other sectors
7.3.2.3 Reporting
Comparison of consumptions in primary energy between CN teleservice and travel depending on distance.
Case study: Cooperative teleservice (CN)Case study: Cooperative teleservice (CN)
15International Telecommunication Union
Video conference held between Tokyo and Yokohama, once a week (48 times / year), one hour each time, participated in by two people from each office
Video conference held between Tokyo and Yokohama, every working day (240 times / year), eight hours each time, participated in by two people from each office
Evaluation Result
0
5
10
15
20
25
Conference on a trip Video conferenceEner
gy C
onsu
mpt
ion(
GJ/
year
)
DisposalUseProduction
Evaluation Result
0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.5
Conference on a trip Video conferenceEner
gy C
onsu
mpt
ion(
GJ/
year
)
DisposalUseProduction
Reduction of 53% (91%) Reduction of 52% (59%)
7.3 Methodologies for ICT impact assessment7.3.2 Impact on other sectors
7.3.2.3 Reporting
Case study: Video conference (Teleconference)Case study: Video conference (Teleconference)
16International Telecommunication Union
7.4 Impacts of ICTs on Climate Change7.4.1 ICT-sector GHG emission mitigation
7.4.1.1 Data servers and data centers
Fans, 4%
Air-conditioning, 44% Reduction of Power Usage by IT Devices Themselves
Reduction of Power Usage by Auxiliary Facilities
Power Supplies, 13%
CPU, Memory, and HDD, 32%
UPS Power Distributions,
7%
PUE(Power usage effectiveness)
=Total facility power consumption
ICT equipment power consumption
DCD(Data center density)
=
Power consumption of all equipment on free-access floor of a data centre
Area of free-access floor
Environmental Impact Basic Unit for ASP/SaaS Services= GHG Emissions (or Power Consumption) per Unit of ASP/SaaS Service (Annual GHG Emissions (or Power Consumption) from the Target Service)
(Annual Service Supply)=