1 klaus keller department of geosciences, penn state [email protected] with contributions from...

22
1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State [email protected] with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear NOAA Climate Observation Program 4th. Annual Systems Review 10-12 May 2006, Silver Spring, MD What are the implications of a potential MOC collapse for the design of ocean observation systems?

Upload: gwen-bryan

Post on 04-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

1

KLAUS KELLERDepartment of Geosciences, Penn State

[email protected]

with contributions fromCatherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

NOAA Climate Observation Program4th. Annual Systems Review

10-12 May 2006, Silver Spring, MD

What are the implications of a potential MOC collapse for the design

of ocean observation systems?

Page 2: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

2

Climate Change can be abrupt when thresholds are crossed.

Data from Meese et al. (1994) and Stuiver et al. (1995).20 year running mean, O18-temp conversion based on Cuffey et al, 1995

-What is a climate threshold?

-Would we have enough warning time?

-How could we improve the warning time?

-What are open challenges?

Page 3: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

3

What is a climate threshold?

- A negative feedback switches to a positive feedback loop.

- The response can occur faster than the forcing and show hysteresis.

- An actionable early warning sign (before the forcing threshold is crossed) may be of considerable economic value.

- Prediction (not just detection) is the relevant task for many decision-making frameworks.

- How does this relate to ocean circulation changes?

Page 4: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

4Pictures: Rahmstorf (1997, left) and Stocker et al (2001, right, modified)

The North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (MOC) may collapse in a threshold response to anthropogenic forcing.

MOC Intensity

Sea SurfaceSalinity

Low-latidudeAdvection

+ +

+

+

What would be possible impacts of a MOC collapse?

Page 5: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

5

What are the implications of a potential MOC collapse for the design of ocean observation systems?

A MOC collapse has been interpreted as “dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system” [O’Neil and Oppenheimer, 2002].

Page 6: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

6

Designing observation systems requires:

(i) Fundamental advances in the disciplines; and

(ii) A solid integration across disciplines.

Page 7: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

7

Page 8: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

8

Current MOC predictions are deeply uncertain.

Schmittner et al, 2005

Page 9: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

9

Page 10: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

10

Would we have enough warning time?Vellinga and Wood [2004]

– Detection of MOC changes is possible within decades (neglecting structural and observational uncertainties).

Baehr et al (2006); Keller et al (2006); Brennan et al (2006)– Decadal-scale hydrographic transects may well fail at reliably detecting

MOC changes within this century.– A continuation of the 26oN MOC observation array could succeed in

detecting MOC changes within this century.– These conclusions are somewhat robust across models, forcing scenarios,

and initial conditions.– The economic value of information associated with a skillful MOC

prediction can be on the order of billions of US$.

Early detection may well be possible with currently know systems.

What about early prediction?

Page 11: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

11

Modified simple box-model from Zickfeld et al (2004) with superimposed AR(1) process error to mimic time-series properties of more complex models.

A simple model that mimics the underlying dynamics and internal variability and may provide some robust insights.

How can we quantify detection and prediction times?

Page 12: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

12

Deriving Detection and Prediction Times

Detection:– Extension of the Santer et al (1995) bootstrap method to account for uncertainty in

observations and the initial conditions.

– Simple Frequentist hypothesis testing.

– Use the high sensitivity case to generate potential future observations.

– Detection time: When can one reject Ho of the unforced state with p < 0.05?

Prediction:– Bayesian data assimilation using Markov Chain Monte Carlo and the Metropolis

Hastings algorithm.

– Likelihood function accounting for autocorrelated errors [Zellner, 1964].

– Uncertainty about a single parameter, the NA hydrological sensitivity, with prior uniform range taken from Zickfeld et al (2004).

– Prediction time: When are the predictions to 95 % correct about the threshold crossing?

This approach neglects several important uncertainties. Considering these uncertainties would likely strengthen our forthcoming conclusions.

Would observing the MOC intensity alone enable early prediction?

Page 13: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

13

Observation systems designed for early detection may fail at the task of early prediction.

- Detection and prediction times are random variables.

- Early detection may well be possible based on MOC observations alone.

- Ocean observation systems designed for early detection of MOC changes may be insufficient for early prediction of a future MOC collapse.

- Early prediction could be achieved using a fingerprint with a higher signal-to-noise ratio.

Page 14: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

14

Page 15: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

15CSIRO model results, cf. Brennan, Matear, and Keller (2006)

Hydrographic tracers may show a larger signal-to-noise ratio than reconstructed flows.

Maximum overturning in North Atlantic

Average oxygen concentration 45-60N, 2000-2500 m.

Page 16: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

16

Page 17: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

17

Extension of the DICE model (McInerney and Keller, 2006)

What are economically efficient risk-management strategies?

MOC model

Page 18: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

18

- Economically “optimal” risk management under uncertainty and learning about the MOC sensitivity (cf. Keller et al, 2004)

– The economic value of information associated with a skillful early prediction might be nontrivial.

– What would be the order of magnitude benefit-cost ratio for an early warning signal?

Reducing the uncertainty about future climate thresholds can improve risk-management strategies.

Keller et al (in prep)

Page 19: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

19

Early prediction capabilities of the MOC response can have significant economic value.

Keller et al (in prep)

Value: One the order of billions of U.S. $ in this very simple example.Price: So far unknown (as we have not done the science yet). Note: typically implemented observation systems cost on the on the order of millions.

Page 20: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

20

Main Conclusions

The currently well tested praxis of relatively infrequent and uncertain MOC observations would likely fail in detecting MOC changes within this century.

Continuing observations similar to the 26oN MOC observation array could succeed in detecting anthropogenic MOC changes within this century.

Prediction of threshold crossing is the relevant task for many decision-making frameworks.

Observation systems designed for early detection may fail at the task of early prediction.

Adding frequent and dense tracer observations (e.g., oxygen or CFC) is a promising strategy to improve the MOC prediction capabilities and may well be part of an economically efficient risk management strategy.

Page 21: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

21

Some Background Information

http://www.geosc.psu.edu/~kkeller/publications.htmlhttp://www.geosc.psu.edu/~kkeller/publications.html

K. Keller, C. Deutsch, M. G. Hall and D. F. Bradford: Early detection of changes in the North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation: Implications for the design of ocean observation systems. Journal of Climate, in the press, (2006).

K. Keller, M. Schlesinger, and G. Yohe, Managing the risks of climate thresholds: Uncertainties and information needs (An editorial essay), Climatic Change, in the press, (2006).

D. McInerney and K. Keller: Economically optimal risk reduction strategies in the face of uncertain climate thresholds Climatic Change, in the press (2006).

K. Keller, D. McInerney, and B. Haupt, Early detection versus prediction of ocean circulation changes: Implications for the design of observation systems. EOS, 87(36) Ocean Sci. Meet. Supp. (2006).

C. Brennan, R. Matear, and K. Keller, Detecting changes in the North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation using oxygen trends, EOS, 87(36) Ocean Sci. Meet. Supp., (2006).

K. Keller, M. Hall, S.-R. Kim, D. F. Bradford, and M. Oppenheimer: Avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system, Climatic Change, 73, 227-238, (2005).

D.-H. Min and K. Keller: Errors in estimated temporal tracer trends due to changes in the historical observation network: A case study of oxygen trends in the Southern Ocean. Ocean and Polar Research, 27(2), 189-195 (2005).

K. Keller, B. M. Bolker, and D. F. Bradford: Uncertain climate thresholds and economic optimal growth, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 48, 723-741 (2004).

K. Keller, R. D. Slater, M. Bender and R. M. Key: Possible biological or physical explanations for decadal scale trends in North Pacific nutrient concentrations and oxygen utilization, Deep-Sea-Research, II, 49, 345-362 (2002).

K. Keller, K. Tan, F. M. M. Morel, and D. F. Bradford: Preserving the ocean circulation: Implications for climate policy, Climatic Change, 47 (1-2) 17-43 (2000).

N. Gruber, K. Keller, and R. M. Key: What story is told by oceanic tracer concentrations? Science, 290, 455, 2000.

Page 22: 1 KLAUS KELLER Department of Geosciences, Penn State kkeller@geosc.psu.edu with contributions from Catherine Brennan, David McInerney, and Richard Matear

22

Open Challenges What kind of observation and analysis system could

deliver a skilled early prediction of a potential threshold response across the relevant parametric and structural uncertainties?

How can we use historic and paleo-observations to better constrain MOC predictions?

Which future observations would improve the MOC forecast skill the most?

What would be an “actionable early warning signal”?

How do stakeholders and decision-makers rank different strategies under deep uncertainty?

What are robust risk management strategies in the face of deeply uncertain climate thresholds?