1 lake mathews airport study created by: beshay, john chow, denise difilippo, sean hoss, sean...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Lake Mathews Airport Study
Created By:• Beshay, John • Chow, Denise • Difilippo, Sean • Hoss, Sean • Medina, Marlon • Olson, Christina • Panek, Greg • Ramos, Ryan • Taylor, Kristin
2
Design Video
• Satellite background image of site
• All images are from design
• Video flight path is design flight path
3
Insert Video
4
Objectives & Master Plan
Greg Panek
5
What is General Aviation?
• Definition–All Non-Military & Non-Airline Flights
• Benefits–1% US GDP–1.3 Million Jobs
6
Project Objectives
• Initial Planning– Demand for Facility– Location of Facility
• Master Plan– Airport Layout Plan– Environmental
Assessment– Cost Analysis
7
Demand Estimation
Greg Panek
8
Area of Focus
9
Area of Focus
10
Inland Empire Airports System
• 16 Existing Airports
• Most Airports Constructed Prior to 1950
• Most Recent Construction in 1989
INLAND EMPIRE
11
Lake Mathews Service Area
12
Population →Airport
PersonnelAirport
Operations→
13
Population Increase
• 60 million Californians by mid-century
• Riverside will become the second most populous county behind Los Angeles
• Los Angeles Times: July 10, 2007
14
• Riverside County– 4.7 million by 2050– 203% increase
• CA Dept. of Finance
Population Increase
15
Population Forecast
• 30 cities in proposed service area
• Census data: 1990, 2000 & 2005
• Each city had a population trend line
• Population forecasts to 2028
16
Population Forecast
17
Population →Airport
PersonnelAirport
Operations→
18
Types of Airport Personnel
• Pilot• Certified Flying Instructor• Control Tower Operator• Flight Engineer• Ground Instructor• Mechanic• Rigger• Repairman
19
Current Airport Personnel
20
Airport Personnel Forecast
• Current records from FAA• Population increase=Airport personnel increase
21
Population →Airport
PersonnelAirport
Operations→
22
Present Day Operations in Region
Airport Operations
Corona Municipal 186
Riverside Municipal 285
Flabob 110
Perris Valley 94
Chino 436
Hemet-Ryan 207
French Valley 269
Total: 1582
23
General Aviation Demand
Airport Operations
Lake Mathews 32
Corona Municipal 184
Riverside Municipal 278
Flabob 108
Perris Valley 92
Chino 421
Hemet-Ryan 202
French Valley 266
Total: 1582
24
General Aviation Demand
1700 Total Operations 1969 Total Operations
25
20 Year Demand Projection
2028
% Ops/Day/Airport 13.0%
Operations per Day 271
Aircraft Based 435
Single Engine 336
Multi Engine 46
Lake Mathews Airport
26
Site Selection
Christina Olson
27
10 Selection Factors
• Convenience to Users• Availability of Land• Design and Layout of the Airport• Airspace Obstructions• Engineering Factors• Social and Environmental Factors• Availability of Utilities• Atmospheric Conditions• Hazards Due to Birds• Coordination with other Airports
28
Three Proposed Sites
Site 2 Site 3
Site 1
29
Proposed Site 1
30
Proposed Site 1
31
Proposed Site 2
32
Proposed Site 2
33
Proposed Site 3
34
Proposed Site 3
35
SITE 1 SITE 2 SITE3
Convenience to Users
Nearest Major City: Perris @ 9.0 miles, Pop. 45600 ; 4.5 miles to 79; 7.0 miles
to 60;
Nearest Major City: Corona @ 6.0 miles, Pop. 149,000; 4.0 miles to 15; 6.0 miles to
91
Nearest Major City: Corona @ 11.5 miles,
Pop. 149,000; 7 miles to 15, 215, 74; 9 miles to 91
Availability of Land
Farmland, developedCounty Land, environmental
preservePrivate Land, not
developed
Design and Layout of the
Airport
Orientation from 270 to 330 degrees, North-West
Orientation from 270 to 330 degrees, North-West
Orientation from 270 to 330 degrees, North-West
Airspace Obstructions
No trees, towers, poles, or buildings; Mountains less than a mile to the south
Sparce trees, no towers, poles or buildings
Few if any trees, no towers, poles, or buildings
Engineering Factors
Topography:Relatively flat; Soil: Loamy Fine Sand;
Drainage: No Issue
Topography: Relatively flat; Soil: Mostly Clay; Drainage:
No Issue
Topography: Relatively Flat w/ small hill to North-
West; Soil: Silty Sand; Drainage: No Issue
Social and Environmental
Factors
3 schools and housing within 2.5 miles, no
churches
No houses, schools or churches within 5 miles; Endangered Stephen's
Kangaroo Rat
Close to Housing; No schools or churches within
5 miles
Availability of Utilities
Water: Less than a mile Electric: Less than a mile
Fire: 5 miles
Water: No pipes within 2 miles Electric: No Power
Line within 2 miles Fire: 4.5 miles
Water: Less than a mile Electric: Less than a mile
Fire: 3 miles
Atmospheric Conditions
Possible Glare from Lake during sunset
Possible fog due to surrounding hills, possible
glare due to lake during sunset
None forseen
Hazard Due to Birds
Possible birds from Lake Perris
Possible birds due to tree's as well as Lake Mathews
No forseeable bird problems
Coordination with Other Airports
Hemet-Ryan & Perris Valley @ 9 miles
Riverside Municipal @ 9 miles
Corona Municipal @ 12 miles
Other Factors
7 documented earthquakes within 5 miles since 1977, with the closest being less
than 1 mile from the proposed site
None None
36
Methodology SITE 1 SITE 2 SITE3
Convenience to Users
1 2 3
Availability of Land
2 1 3
Design and Layout of the
Airport3 3 3
Airspace Obstructions
1 2 3
Engineering Factors
2 1 3
Social and Environmental
Factors2 1 1
Availability of Utilities
3 1 3
Atmospheric Conditions
2 1 3
Hazard Due to Birds
2 2 3
Coordination with Other Airports
1 2 3
Other Factors -2 0 0
TOTAL 17 16 28
37
Airport Layout Plan
Sean Di Filippo
38
Airport Layout Plan
• Runway Placement, Orientation, and Length
• Taxiway Layout
• Airport Marking, Lighting, and Signage
39
Runway Dimensions
• Design Aircraft
• Airport Elevation
• Temperature
• Adjacent Land
40
Wind Analysis
•Historical Wind Data Collected From Weather Stations Surrounding Site
•Data Compiled Into Single Wind Rose
41
Wind Rose Analysis
Wind Coverage Greater Than 95%
42
Terrain Analysis
Best Terrain Alignment and Runway Placement
43
Runway Profile
44
Final Wind RoseWind Coverage
10.5 Knot Crosswind
Runway 9 84.06%
Runway 27 95.14%
Combined 96.16%
Preferred Runway
________________
Runway 9 12.90%
Runway 27 87.10%
9
27
45
Runway Overview
Apron
4000 Feet Long Runway
Runway 27Runway 9
46
Runway Summary
Layout Distance (ft)
Runway Length 4000
Runway Width 75
Runway Shoulder Width 10
Runway Blast Pad Width 95
Runway Blast Pad Length 150
Runway Safety Area Width 150
Runway Safety Area Length 300
Runway Object Free Area Width 500
Runway Object Free Area Length 300
47
Taxiway Layout
Acute Angled Exits
Single Holding BayParallel Taxiway South of Runway
90° Exits
48
Taxiway Summary
Layout Distance (ft)
Taxiway Width 35
Taxiway Shoulder Width 10
Taxiway Safety Area Width 79
Taxiway Edge Safety Margin 7.5
49
Airport Markings
Centerline
Runway Designator
Blast Pad
Runway Edge
50
Airport MarkingsAim Point Taxiway Centerline
Movement Area Boundary
Hold Marking
51
Airport Lighting
Runway Edge Lights
Taxiway Edge Lights
Threshold Lights Visual Approach Slope
52
Airport Signage
9-27
D
Runway
Taxiway S
Apron
Taxiway D S
FBO3
53
Airport Layout Plan
Marlon Medina
54
Facility Layout Plan
• Facility includes– Hangers– Tiedowns– Transient aprons
• Proposed Facilities– 50 transient aprons– 176 based
airplanes• 2028 future facilities
– 243 based airplanes
55
Airport Layout Plan
Landside• Terminal area plan
– Structures– Parking– Signing and striping
• Access roads– Signing and striping
• Perimeter road
56
Terminal Area Plan • Structures
– 12,000 sq. ft. terminal building
– 4,200 sq. ft. F.B.O building
• Parking
– 173 total parking
– 6 disabled parking
• Geometric design
– AASHTO Geometric Design of Highways and Streets
• Signing and striping
– California MUTCD
– Caltrans 2006 Standard Plans
57
Access Road
• Signing and Striping– California MUTCD 2006– Caltrans 2006 Standard Plans
• Geometric Design– AASHTO Policy on Geometric
Design of Highways and Streets
58
Perimeter Road
• Fire and maintenance access• Based on Caltrans Highway Design Manual
– Design speed– Width
59
Pavement
Kristin Taylor
60
Pavement Design Overview
• Soil classification within the Lake Mathews project area
• Flexible pavement design
• Rigid pavement design
• Final selection for pavement design
61
Soil Classification
• USDA classification of soils was found using Web Soil Survey v2.0.
• CBR value was found using FAA standards.
• A CBR value of four was selected.
Soil Types within project area
Engineering properties
MapUnit
Depth(inch)
USDA TextureUnifiedClass.
CBR ValueAssigned
CaD2 0-13 Fine sandy loam SM 20 - 40
13-22 Loam, clay loam CL 5 -15
22-62Weathered
bedrock --- ---
LaC 0-12 Loam CL, CL-ML 5-15
12-32 Clay loam, clay CH, CL 3-5
32-54Weathered
bedrock --- ---
ChD2 0-13 Fine sandy loam SM 20-40
13-22 Loam, clay loam CL 5-15
22-62Weathered
bedrock --- ---
Bfc 0-23 Clay 20-45
32-36Weathered
bedrock 20-47
62
Flexible Pavement Design
• Due to the gross weight of our service aircraft (Less than12,500 pounds) our design was based on light weight aircraft criteria.
• FAA specifies that no reduction in thickness should be made for “noncritical” areas of pavement (i.e. Apron).
63
Results of Flexible Pavement Design
Hot Mix Asphalt Surface: Four inches
Structural Base: Three inches
Subbase: Nine inches
Subgrade Compaction: 90% for Four to Eight inches
References: Federal Aviation Administration: AC 150-5320-6D, Chapter 5 Pavements for light aircraft.
64
Flexible Pavement Detail
65
Rigid Pavement Design
• Subbase: Is required due to the soil type CH located within our runway.
• Subgrade: 90% compaction required for soil types found within our project site.
• Jointing: Not to exceed maximum spacing.
66
Results for Rigid Pavement Design
Portland Cement Concrete: 5 inches
Subbase: 5 inches
Subgrade: 90 % compaction
Joint spacing: See
Detail
67
Rigid Pavement Detail
68
Selection of Pavement
Flexible pavement was selected for the Lake Mathews Municipal Airport due to construction costs and timeline.
69
Grading
Kristin Taylor
70
Grading Plan Overview
• Grading of runway and taxiway
• Grading of non-critical areas
• Final grading plan
• Earthwork
71
Runway & Taxiway Specifications
72
Runway Cross Section
73
Grading of Non-Critical Areas
• Access Road – 2% from the center line to the gutters on either side.
• Perimeter Road – 2% away from runway and taxiway.
• Apron – Design to allow surface flow of 1% away from the taxiway to the south edge of the apron area, where the water is treated.
• Structures – For buildings and other structures a 2% grade for a minimum of 10 feet was used.
74
Final Grading Plan
Existing and proposed surfaces showing the grading needed for site
75
Earthwork Quantities
Cut:
Cubic Yards
Fill:
Cubic Yards
Net Earthwork:
Cubic Yards
54,245 29,280 Cut 24,965
Summary: Based on the designed grading plan a net cut of 24,965 cubic yards will need to be removed from the project site.
76
Airport Drainage
Sean Hoss
77
Drainage
• Promotes safe and efficient operations
• Handles airport surface runoff
• Diverts runoff away from Lake Mathews
• Two drainage areas– Runway handled by Volume Based drainage– Ramp area handled by Flow Based drainage
• Based on Riverside County Flood Control District BMP Handbook
78
Runway Runoff
• Corrugated steel pipe– Slope = 0.005
– Di = 15”, Df = 24”
– Inlets at 400 feet or less– Water quality inlet
• Ponding – Rainfall > 0.85 in/hr– 10 acre-ft storage
• Outfall– Extended detention basin
79
Ramp Runoff
• Filter strip (turf grass)– 15’ depth– Wide as the ramp– Removes pollutants
and sediment
• Infiltration trench– Aggregate 1-3”– 48 hr drawdown– Overflow pipe to
detention basinSource: RCFCD BMP Handbook
80
Environmental Impact Assessment
Denise Chow
81
Environmental Noise Impact• Environmental Concerns
• With restrictions in time, we will concentrate on noise impact
• INM: Integrated Noise Model
– FAA approved Airport Noise Exposure Map
– Noise contours generated with real-time values and coordinates
• General allowable threshold
– FAA (Advisory Circular) 65 dB
– 7 different thresholds of noise level
82
Noise Assessment DataAirport Location Runway Position Aircraft Models
Lat: 33.79805 Length 4000 ft Group A-II
Long: -117.375828 Width 75 ft DHC6 Dash 6
Elevation 2080 Runway 9 Group B-II
Annual Operations 97000
33.799133
-117.382283FAL20 Falcon20
Daily Operations 271
Runway 27 Helicopter
33.796964
-117.369375B206L Bell 206L Long Ranger
83
Importing Supplemental Data
• CAD graphics– Airport runway layout– AutoCAD DXF file for graphic enhancement
• Terrain data– Topographic map overlay– Signify elevation affecting noise propagation
• Street census– Streets, highways, hydrographic features, civil boundaries– Overlays street map data
• Population census– Population points– Enables visual inspection of sound impact on neighboring residents
84
Integrated Noise Model
85
Integrated Noise Model
86
Integrated Noise Model
87
Integrated Noise Model
88
Integrated Noise Model
89
Outcome
• Viable source for current and future noise predictions generated by Lake Matthews Airport (LMA) and its components
• Ensure LMA from causing unwanted noise around neighboring communities– Homes, schools,
businesses– Easement required
dB Level Population Acres
55.0 894 4113.5
60.0 529 2158.3
65.0 194 913.9
70.0 15 155.4
75.0 0 40.1
80.0 0 10.5
85.0 0 3.1
90
Sound Decibel Threshold
• 65 dB Threshold– Not designated under
Federal, State, or local law
– Responsibility for permissible land use remains with local authorities
– Sound proofing packages
91
Cost Estimate
Ryan Ramos
92
Cost Estimate
• 2006 RSMeans Building Construction Cost Data
• Discrepancy in price values between 2006 and present
93
Airport CostPavement $10,155,726
Earthwork $2,349,183
Striping $207,224
Airport Structures $7,652,721
Landscape $68,079
Airport Signage $41,500
Airport Fencing $835,380
Drainage $952,992
Sound wall $582,977
Total $ 23,568,125
94
Airport Contingency Plan
• 20% Conceptual Stage• 5% Economic Factors• 4% Utilities• 1% Permits
Total Cost + 30% Contingency
∑= $ 23,568,125 + $7,070,437 = $30,638,562
95
Lake Mathews Airport
• Aviation demand levels deemed an additional airport necessary
• Selection of an appropriate site location
• Successful completion of the Master Plan– Design and layout– Environmental noise impact– Cost analysis
96
Questions?