1 marine corps task list mctl / met / metl life cycle life cycle aug 2015 marine corps task list...
TRANSCRIPT
UNCLASSIFIED 1
Marine Corps Task List MCTL / MET / METL
Life Cycle
AUG 2015
Marine Corps Task List MCTL / MET / METL
Life Cycle
AUG 2015
Maryroi Goldman, CIV
MCTL Branch Head
HQMC, CD&I, CDD, MAGTF Integration Division
Office of Strategic Management
AUG 2015
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED 2
Overview
MCTL/MET/METL Life Cycle and Development Process
MCT-to-MET Alignments to Mission Statement and Structure (T/O&E)
MCT-to-MET Alignments to Training
MCTIMS, The Authoritative Data Source System: Policy and Web Tools
The DRRS-MC Connection
MET/METL Review Workshops and Approval Process
Supporting Future Capability Mission Thread Development and Acquisition Strategies
CD&I MCTL Website and MCTL Branch Contact Info
UNCLASSIFIED
MCT / MET / METL Life Cycle
(CURRENT Capabilities)Core, OPLAN,
Assigned Missionor
(FUTURE Capabilities)Expeditionary Force 21
MC Service Campaign Plan
3
Manpower, Equipment,
Trained Performance
Standards and Metrics
RFFs / FORCE SOURCING THE ESTABLISHED USMC CURRENT
CAPABILITIES
REQUIREMENTSCAPABILITIESSTRUCTURE/RESOURCES
MISSION PERFORMANCE MISSION ASSESSMENTS
“Force in Readiness”Provides MCSHA Analytics
MCT / MET / METL Life Cycle is the organizational relationship between Mission Planning, Requirements, Capabilities, Resources, Capabilities Sourcing and Readiness performance
indicators reported in DRRS-MC
Authoritative Data Source
(ADS) System Interfacing
METs/METLs
USMC MISSION (Current-to-Future Future-to-Current
Cycle)
USMC READINESSDRRS-MC
“CAPABILITY”MCTL “Tasks” =
METs/METLsTFSMS (T/O&E)
MCTIMS (Training)
AUG 2015
4
MCTL is a “Dictionary” of current USMC activities or actions defined as “Tasks” that an organization must perform to accomplish a mission.
MCT’s are used by COI/SE as “Building Blocks” for METs/METLs
MCTL Supports Current CapabilityMET/METL Development
USMC TASKS:MCT 1.12.1 Conduct Amphibious OPS
MCT 1.6.1 Conduct Offensive OPS
MCT 1.6.4 Conduct Defensive OPS
MCT 1.13 Conduct Irregular Warfare (IW)
MCT 1.13.2 Conduct NEO
MCT 1.14 Conduct Stability OPS
MCT 1.18.1 Support COIN OPS
MCT 1.15.1.2 Facilitate Foreign HA
UNCLASSIFIED
TASK (MET)
TASK (MET)
TASK (MET)
TASK (MET)
TASK (MET)
EX: INFANTRY CORE METs:1. MCT 1.12.1 Conduct Amphibious OPS
2. MCT 1.6.1 Conduct Offensive OPS
3. MCT 1.6.4 Conduct Defensive OPS
4. MCT 1.14 Conduct Stability OPS
5. MCT 1.18.1 Support COIN OPS**
**Not deemed CORE by Community but could be used in an Assigned Mission/OPLAN METL
EX: INFANTRY CORE METL
1 2
3 4
AUG 2015
5
Official Tri-Service Directive
OPNAVINST 3500.38MCO 3500.26
USCG COMDTINST 3500.1
5
Standardized “Dictionary/Library” of common language “Tasks” an
organization must perform to accomplish mission capabilities
1. Maneuver2. Intelligence3. Fires4. Logistics5. Command and Control6. Force Protection
Contains Task Title, Task Definition, Doctrinal References and Suggested Measures
EXAMPLE Marine Corps TaskTask Title: MCT 1.12.1 Conduct Amphibious Operations Definition: To conduct a military operation launched from the sea by an amphibious force, embarked in ships or craft with the
primary purpose of introducing a landing force ashore to accomplish the assigned mission. Types of amphibious operations include assaults, withdrawals, demonstrations, raids, and other amphibious operations in a permissive, uncertain, or hostile environment.
Doctrinal References: (JP 1-02, 3-02, MCDP 1-0, 3, MCWP 3-33.7, 4-11.8, MCRP 3-33.7A, MCO 3104.1)Suggested/EXAMPLE Measures:
M1 Percent Of qualified and deployable MOS Marines available to conduct Amphibious Operations. M2 Percent Of Mission Essential Equipment (MEE) supply on hand and Mission Ready. M3 Y/N Able to conduct amphibious operations at MEB level, transitioning MAGTF capabilities ashore from amphibious shipping.M4 Y/N Regimental HQ capable of executing C2 throughout all phases of the amphibious operation.
MCTL Task Organization
UNCLASSIFIED
Designed Capabilities of a USMC Unit
or
Functional Support Capabilities of an Installation / Base / Station
Organized by the Six Warfighting Functions
AUG 2015
6
CD&I’s MCO on the METL Development Process
USMC units/installations report mission readiness in DRRS-MC using the MET/METL construct drawing from tasks in MCTL.
(PP&O MCO 3000.13 Readiness Reporting SOP - Revision 2015-16)
MCO 3500.110 Codifies and Validates:– Process owners, roles and responsibilities– Synchronization and integration of METL development with Advocates– Provides a common, cohesive process and methodology for METL development – Establishes a “central repository” for MET/METL data (MCTIMS/Task Master Module)
HQMC CD&IMCO 3500.110 METL Development, Review,
Approval, Publication and Maintenance(15 Jul 2011)
UNCLASSIFIEDAUG 2015
7
SUPPLIERS INPUTS PROCESS OUTPUTS CUSTOMERS
• Units
• Installations
• Unit w/Designed Capability• Mission Statement• SE and Installation Support
to the Warfighter• MCTL Task/s• USMC or Joint Doctrine• Conditions • T/O (MOS) & T/E (MEE/PEI)• Training Events (E-Coded
Individual/Collective) Exercises and Certifications aligned to COI T&R Manuals
• DoDI – Installation Benchmark and/or Title X Requirements
Process Flowchart Below
Policy Controls:• DoD DRRS Enterprise
Policies• MCO 3500.26 (MCTL)• MCO 3000.13 DRRS-MC• MCO 3500.110 (METL)• MCO 1553.10 (MCTIMS) METL Development Workshops Adjudication/Advocates Incorporation into MCTL / MCTIMS / DRRS-MC
• List of “Mission Essential” MCTs
ConditionsStandards/Criteria Metrics: - P = Personnel - E = Equipment - T = Training - O = Output
• Commanders• MARFORs/MEFs/ MEUs/MEBs/Units• Install/Bases• Advocates• CD&I Integration
Divisions – Force Development and WIPEB Strategies
• HQMC / PP&O• MROC / JROC• CONGRESS• SECDEF / POTUS
Identify Conditions that
Affect Task Performance
Develop List of Unit or Installation
Capabilities/Tasks
Determine Task Output Criteria: Y/N, Time, etc. to conduct Task for Mission
Success
Determine Standards for Each
Task
Core Design Capability
Prioritize Tasks as Essential/Critical to
Mission Success
Start
Finish
MET / METL Development Process
Determine T/O & T/E Required that Affect Task Performance
Identify Training Events that Affect Task Performance
UNCLASSIFIEDAUG 2015
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED 8
CD&I TFSD Mission Statement Guidance(MCO 5311.1E - 2015)
Mission Statements define capabilities (core competencies or operational requirements) for the Marine Corps, and describe the mission, associated METs/METL, organization, concepts of organization and employment, administrative and logistics capabilities, and command and signal.
Title X mandates capabilities/requirements for ALL branches of the Armed Services within DoD IOT accomplish assigned tasks for the United States Government.
MAGTF Advocates are responsible for creation, review, modification, formal staffing and GO endorsement of proposed final copy, and will ensure every unit identified by a UIC has a current Mission Statement.
Units without valid Mission Statements run the risk of not having submitted Tables of Organization and Equipment Change Requests (TOECRs) considered.
Mission Statement for units/SE will be reviewed every three years.
MAGTF Advocates will associate assigned METs with their appropriate units’ Mission Statements and will review, modify or create new (if required) for each unit within its purview.
MAGTF Advocates will have three (3) months from date of a revised or developed Marine Corps Task (MCT) incorporation within the MCTL, and used as a MET within an operational reportable METL, to update their affected Mission Statements.
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED 9
EXAMPLE: COI Mission Statement Identifies Aligned MCTs/METs
COI Mission Statement should align with COI METs/METLs
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED 10
EXAMPLE: INTEL, Radio, LE Mission Statements, T/O Structure
(TFSMS)
IINTEL BN1999
RADIO BN2011
LE BN2012
UNCLASSIFIED 11
EXAMPLE: T/E Structure (TFSMS) MET Alignment to T/E-to-TAMCN
AUG 2015
CD&I Future Data Alignment Goal:
Equipment or System-of-Systems Exiting/ Modernization/ Life Cycle data can be linked to an Org or Unit’s T/E (MEE/PEI) for their DRRS-MC readiness reportable METs.
MCTs-to-METs-to-METLs illustrates a defined mission “Capability”
METs-to-TAMCNs-to-MCPCs-to-PORs/CACs (Program $$) can provide leadership the analytics for defensible decision-making on materiel ROI, or, where the organization will have potential capability degradation and mission risks.
MEF METs could align to T/E
UNCLASSIFIED 12
EXAMPLE: SE MET Measure Alignment to MCPCs
AUG 2015
MCT 6.0 Protect the Force (used in Installation / Base / Station DRRS-MC reportable METL)
M1 Y/N An effective and comprehensive CBRN Protection Program has been implemented.M2 Y/N An effective and comprehensive Antiterrorism Program has been implemented.M3 Y/N An effective and comprehensive Physical Security Program has been implemented.
M4 Y/N An effective and comprehensive Critical Infrastructure Protection Program has been implemented.
M5 Y/N An effective and comprehensive Emergency Management Program has been implemented.M6 Y/N An effective and comprehensive Continuity of Operations Plan has been implemented.M7 Y/N An effective and comprehensive Fire and Emergency Services Program has been implemented.M8 Y/N An effective and comprehensive Installation Law Enforcement Program has been implemented.M9 Y/N An effective and comprehensive expeditionary law and order operations program has been implemented.M10 Y/N An effective and comprehensive Consequence Management Plan has been implemented.
M11 Y/N An effective and comprehensive Pandemic Influenza/Contagious Disease Containment Program has been implemented.M12 Y/N An effective and comprehensive Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) program has been established.M13 Y/N Security capabilities supporting maneuver of forces available.M14 Number Of casualties due to non-combat operations (includes all hazards incidents [natural causes, dxwx], fratricide and accidents, insider threat).
M15 Y/N Plan, implement, and sustain force protection/security measures against enemy actions.
M16 Time After initial warning of attack/event and within 10 minutes, to warn supported organizations/friendly forces (e.g. CBRN, SSM, Enemy Aircraft, and indirect/direct fire).M17 Time After attack/event to recover operational capability.M18 Y/N Are Base Operating Support (BOS) Lines of Operations (LOO) rated at Common Output Levels of Service (COLS) 2 or better?
M19 Y/N Operations Centers/ EOCs are able to effectively and responsively plan, coordinate, communicate and execute capabilities in support of local, regional, or national crises.
M20 Y/N Facility Condition Index (FCI) rating of Q2 or better for associated security services facilities.
Funding Stream / Program $$ MCPC links back to provided SE capability
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED 13
MCTs/METs are Aligned to Training
MCTL serves as the common reference for USMC commanders, staffs, and trainers. Units serving in their Core and Assigned Missions derive their “tasks” from MCTL and are required to reporting their operational readiness to execute these tasks in DRRS-MC.
A MCT that is considered “essential” or “critical” to mission accomplishment becomes a Mission Essential Task (MET).
METs are externally focused and are tasks for which the unit was designed, organized, or sourced to the mission or OPLAN.
METs answer the question “Why does this unit exist?” METs are focused outside the command, support another command, or directly affect the enemy.
Standards: Personnel, Equipment, Training and Certification requirements, Output measures.
Core Tasks define the design capabilities for a type of unit, are published in the MCTIMS Task Master ADS database, and are used to develop the type community’s T&R Manual.
Assigned Mission Tasks/OPLAN Tasks are developed when a unit prepares to participate in a specific unit deployment, operation, or alert mission (e.g., MEU BN Landing Team, Global Response Force) and may/may not be “additive” tasks to the established Core METL.
Unit METs/METLs
Unit METL Core
Mission
METMCT
METMCT
DRRS-MC
Assigned Mission
METMCT
METMCT
Readiness Standards
Personnel
Equipment Outputs
Subordinate Units
Certification
Supporting Units
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED 14
Marine Corps Training & Information Management System (MCTIMS)
HQMC CD&I / MCCDC TECOM’s Database with 14 Separate, Stand-alone User Modules:
Task Master provides the Authoritative Data Source (ADS) for MCTL MCTs and all USMC current unit, installation/base/station organizational METs/METLs with performance training standards aligned to other MCTIMS Modules
Maintained by CD&I/CDD/MID MCTL Branch and MARFORCOM G3
MARFORCOM Exports/Interfaces MET/METL data to DRRS-MC weekly
https://mctims.usmc.mil/TNRManual/Taskmaster/Pages/Home.aspx
To obtain a Task Master Account, contact MCTIMS Helpdesk: CAC Card, First/Last name, E-mail and Phone number E-mail: [email protected] MCTIMS Help Desk DSN: 278-4093 / Commercial: 703-784-4093
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED 15
HQMC CD&I / MCCDC TECOMMCO 1553.10
MCTIMS SOP 2014
MOS Roadmap MOS Manual Student Registrar Curriculum Management Scheduling Management Student Management Student Evaluation
Task Master Training & Readiness Manual Unit Training & Individual Marine Mgmt. Electronic Training Jacket Training Resources Pre-Deployment Report Server
UNCLASSIFIED 16
MY MODULES
TMTASK MASTER
MCTIMS Task Master – The Authoritative Data Source System for MCTL / METLs
AUG 2015
17UNCLASSIFIED
MCTIMS Task MasterTask Sets, METs, Standards, T&R
AUG 2015
Infantry T&R Manual (NAVMC 3500.44) E-Coded events for :
MCT 1.6.1 Conduct Offensive OPS
18
Marine Corps Task Linkages
MCT 1.6.4 Conduct Defensive Ops
MCT 5.7.4 Plan and Direct Defensive Ops
MCT 1.6.4 Conduct Defensive Ops
MCT 1.1.2 Provide Task Organized Forces
SN 5.3.5.3.1 Provide Forces – OPLANs/CONPLANs
Infantry BN (SPMAGTF)
Infantry Regt HQ
Marine Division
MCICOM--MCIEast (II MEF)--MCIWest (I MEF)--MCIPac (III MEF)
MARFOR
“Tasks”/METs are linked Top Down / Bottom Up ISO HHQ and Reported in DRRS-MC
Supported COCOM/CCDR JMETL
MEF/MEU/MEB
MCT 1.7 Support Maneuver Through the Provision of Training Ranges (Tactical Training Support, Ranges/Areas, Facilities, Devices)
MCT 4.6.6 Community Services
MCT 4.1 Conduct Supply Operations
MCT 4.3 Conduct Transportation Operations
MCT 4.6 Provide Services (Nonmaterial & Support Activities)
MCT 4.6.3 Provide Airfield Operation Services
MCT 4.9 Provide Base and Station Facilities and Related Infrastructure
MCT 6 Protect the Force
USMC
METL
Installations / Bases / Stations providing Support &
Programs to the Warfighters and their Families
AUG 2015
Reported in DRRS-SDoD / JS / OSD / Chairman’s
Readiness System
UNCLASSIFIED
DRRS-Enterprise & ADS Interfaces
AUG 2015 19
NIPR
DRRS-MC SIPR-CLASSIFIED
ADS DOMAIN TRANSFER
SERMIS(Aviation)
AMSRR(Aviation)
MCTFS(Personnel)
MDR / GCSS (Equipment)Facilities Condition
Index(MILCON)
MCTL and METs/METLs reside UNCLASS
in MCTIMS Task Master Module
JWICS / DCIIN / MARMS
MC-CAMS / MARMSUSMC Installation Preparedness
(Org Structure T/O & T/E)
UNCLASSIFIED
NALCOMIS(Aviation)
Joint Worldwide Intel Communications SystemJoint Defense Continuity & Integrated Intel NetworkJoint Mission Assurance Risk Management System
Possible FUTURE Interface
BIDE / GSORTS / ESORTS / GDSSService Unit Status Reports/Basic ID Data Elements
Global Status of Resources and Training SystemEnhanced Global Status of Resources and Training System
Global Decision Support System
JOPES / JCCA / GCSSJoint Operational Planning/Execution System
Joint Combat Capability Assessment Global Combat Support System
DoD / JS / OSD / Chairman’s Readiness System
MFC Force Provider METL Data / RFF
EXPORT
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED 20
MET/METL Review Workshops are conducted prior to COI T&R Manual Reviews per 3-Yr. cycle battle rhythm established by MCCDC/TECOM. CD&I, TECOM, MARFORCOM and Advocate release coordinated Naval Message with detailed COI requirements:
Review Community Mission Statement to ensure they can meet organizational capability and mission intent. Be prepared to submit recommendations for updating if needed.
Map personnel from current established TFSMS T/O to the METs within the current METL. (This aids COI in identifying and developing improved personnel standards.)
Map equipment from current established TFSMS T/E to the METs within the current METL. (This enables COI to identify inaccuracies/deficiencies/excesses of equipment.)
Use current T&R Manual to determine qualitative training standards aligned to the METs, and be prepared to submit recommendations for incorporation of NEW training events, if needed.
Recommended changes to the T&R Manual resulting from the Workshop is detailed within a Record of Proceedings (ROP) and given to the TECOM OccField/SME to support follow-on COI T&R Manual review.
Developed products are staffed in MCATS for COI and Advocate review/approval.
MET / METL Review Workshops Process(MCO 3500.110)
21
MET / METL Typesand Workshop Goals
UNCLASSIFIED
• Core Mission Essential Tasks – Critical, discrete, externally-focused activities that enable execution of the organizational mission;
tasks for which standing organizations were designed; standardized for each unit type• Core Plus Mission Essential Tasks
– Have lower probability of execution; theater specific; NOT included in unit readiness assessments; Units may elect to include Core Plus tasks in their METLs and associated training plans
• Assigned Mission Essential Tasks– Assessed when 25 percent or more of a unit deploys or prepares to deploy in support of a Named
Operation; Based on Core METs, Core Plus METs, Mission templates, and deployment guidance
Select MCTs as METs and Develop COI METL = 20% of the WG’s time
Select Conditions = <10% of the WG’s time
Establish Standards = >70% of the WG’s time
An accurate accounting of mission “critical” tasks your organization does for the fight
Broad brush canvas of the environment you expect to do the task in
Relevant, measurable metrics shaping the evaluation of COI readiness to execute a critical task or unit mission
AUG 2015
22
MET Standard Types
Resource Standards: Manpower (T/O) and Equipment (T/E) required to produce the outputs
Training/Certification Standards: Training required to produce the outputs Links DRRS-MC assessment to COI T&R Manual standards Links “E” coded events to the MET; identifies Exercises/Certs required
Output (Performance) Standards: Quantify the outputs provided to the gaining Force Commander Focus on results rather than process, inputs, or resources applied
Subordinate/Supporting Unit Standards: Tasks performed by other units that are required to produce the outputs Required for intermediate level commands
UNCLASSIFIEDAUG 2015
MET Personnel (T/O) & Equipment (T/E) Standards
• Measure the Personnel required to produce the required task outputs under the selected task conditions; Link Personnel on the unit (T/O) to the tasks they support; Personnel metrics are used in DRRS-MC to assess the resources required to accomplish the task
Personnel Examples:>= 16 crews formed>= 80% Of T/O billets filled with MOS-qualified, deployable personnel>= 80% of MOS 0621 T/O filled with MOS-qualified, deployable personnel>= 2 MOS 0602 billets filled with MOS-qualified, deployable personnel
• Measure the Equipment required to produce the required task outputs under the selected task conditions; Link Equipment on the unit Table of Equipment (T/E) to the tasks they support; Equipment metrics are used in DRRS-MC to assess the resources required to accomplish the task
Equipment Examples: >= 80% of BN T/E Stinger sub-systems mission ready and available >= 2 DTC (or equivalent stand-alone equipment) ready and available >= 80% of single channel radios T/E ready and available
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED 23
MET Training & Output Standards
• Measure the Training required to produce the required task outputs under the selected task conditions; Training metrics are used in DRRS-MC to:
Assess the training required for the taskSupport the calculation of the percentage of METs trainedNormally refer to E-coded events in an approved COI T&R Manual, or Collective events identified by the community as critical indicators of a unit’s ability to perform a MET
Training Example:>=4 teams trained to standard in 0321-AMPH-4002 Conduct a clandestine amphibious landing/withdrawal
• Measure the capability to produce the required Output or endstate. Quantify and scope the activity described by the task; Output metrics are used in DRRS-MC to assess the observation of the task performance.
Output Examples:>= 22,400 gallons per day of bulk fuel received/stored/dispensed>= 2 site(s) established to provide immediate humanitarian assistance, including food, water, and health servicesY/N Capable of boarding high freeboard shipY/N Capable of applying combat power to delay, impede, halt, or dislodge the enemyY/N Capable of seizing multiple battalion objectives through surface and/or heliborne assault
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED 24
MCTs/METs/METLs Approval Process
• COI’s identifying desired future capability requirements could be submitted to CD&I/CDD, but are NOT acceptable to reflect current capabilities required for DRRS-MC.
• Mission criteria based on future T/O&E requirements prevents development of an adequate Training plan resulting in artificially skewing COI’s combat capability assessment and creating degraded readiness within DRRS-MC
.• MCT/MET changes require collaborative coordination with
CD&I, TECOM and MARFORCOM.
• COI requires change/modification to existing MCTs used as a MET in their METL, due to structure changes, resource or training deficiencies.
• COI may conduct a “Capabilities Based Assessment” (CBA) or T&R Manual review, but the MET/METL Review and Development Workshop should be precursor.
• COI independent CBA and T&R Manual reviews outside of the established MET/METL process necessitates corrective understanding, and often, repeatable work.
• CD&I, along with TECOM and MARFORCOM, conduct COI MET/METL reviews PRIOR to T&R Manual reviews.
• MET/METL review process is “lock-step” with Mission Statement and COI T&R Manual reviews conducted every three (3) years.
• Workshop deliverables require COI/Advocate/OAG validation of Mission Statement and structure accuracy, current capabilities with trained proficiencies aligned to the T&R Manual, and output standards that provide adequate ability to assess a METL’s readiness.
• CD&I facilitates new or modified changes to MCTs within MCTIMS Task Master for immediate use by COI as a reportable MET within their METL
• COI identified METs are reflected in the COI Mission Statement within TFSMS to support TOECR change modifications.
MET/METL Review/Staffing TIMELINE/Suspense: 45-day WG staffing of deliverables conducted by MARFORCOM for COI/Advocate review/concurrenceReview LEAD: COI HHQ, Advocate
MET/METL Review and Development Workshops is a collaborative meeting with COI reps, conducted with guidance by CD&I/CDD MCTL Branch and TFSD, TECOM Ground and Aviation Sections, and MARFORCOM G3/5/7.
CONSIDERATIONSDISCONNECTS
25
PROCESS CONTROL ENDSTATE
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED 26
Supporting Future Capability, Mission Thread Development, and
Acquisition Strategies
UNCLASSIFIED
CD&I is the “Capability Portfolio Integrator”
1
SecurityCooperation
Crisis Response
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
JCA JCA JCA JCA JCA JCA JCA JCA JCA
Cross-portfolio integration, in the context of Expeditionary Force 21 & MCSCP
MCO
MEU
MEB / MEF
MARFOR
UnitSPMAGTF
METs/METLs provide cross-cutting constructs (mission threads) that connect the “stovepipes” of the JCAs
Future METs/METLs
Mission ThreadMission Support
Current MCTs/METs
SE
AUG 2015 27
Internal Divisions reorganized by Joint Capability Area (JCA) for more efficient Capability Portfolio Management (CPM)
Across the DOTMLPF and JCAs
MCTs/METs Used in Future Capability Mission Thread Development
𝐂apability=𝑻 𝑎𝑠𝑘𝑠+𝑪 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠+𝑺 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑠+𝑾 𝑎𝑦𝑠+𝑴 𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠MCTMET
Measures from UJTL/MCTL/etc.,
criteria from multiple sources
DoctrineTactics
ProceduresProcesses
ResourcesPerformers
Fully Described
(Instantiated)
Derived from scenario and UJTL
conditions list.Capability Achieves Desired Effect(s)
Mission Thread: An operational and technical description of the end-to-end set of tasks [MCTs/METs], comprised of performers (T/O) and systems (T/E) that accomplish the execution of a mission. (DoDAF)
UNCLASSIFIED 29
TRAP Mission Thread Example
Acquisition Mission Thread Example
Human Resources Development Process Mission Thread Example
Legend
Cross Portfolio Integration& Mission Threads
TRAP Mission
TRAP
T/O
TRAP
T/E
USMC TRAP Mission Thread
Pilot Project “TRAP” Mission ThreadCutting across, while impacting, JCA capability portfolios
HRDP Mission
Acquisition Mission
Future TRAP Mission
METs/METLs
AUG 2015
A Mission Thread is enabled by the MET
T/O&E, T&R data; aligns to other threads, and can be
“templated” and reused for different scenarios.
High Quality People
Unit Readiness – DRRS-MC
Capability and Capacity vs. Requirements
Service Level Outcomes
Unit Level Assigned MissionsUnit Level Core Missions
Manage/Sustain the Total Force
Installation Services ISO
Operational Mission
Modernize Toward Expeditionary
Force 21
Funding, Data, Marine Corps Enterprise Network (MCEN)
Service Tempo Force Capacity Man/Train/EquipOther ServiceDependencies
METs/METLs = Personnel (P); Equipment Condition (R); Supply (S); Training (T)
Operational Outcomes
that Require Funding
Relate Resources to Mission Readiness, Capabilities & Outcomes
Investment Impacts
Aggregate Operational
Goals
Funding Investments
that Support the
Force
Targeted Investment
Goals
Mission Assurance Assessments Sourcing Impacts
Infrastructure Sustainment
Equipment Modernization
• Recruit• Train & Educate• Manage & Retain• Sustain Quality of Life
• Facilities Support• Facilities Protection• CMD & Staff Support• I/T• Training & OPS Support• Logistics Support
• Fielding Plans• Acquisition: Cost / Schedule / Performance• Funding Profiles• Future Req’ts• Platform / Equip Age
METs/METLs Role inthe “Pillars”of a Balanced Force
UNCLASSIFIED 31
ECMP
Overview of PPBE Process
= Transition
= document
Inside circle = process output
Outside circle = process input
= CPRB
PP&O &
CD&I (Futures)
CD&I (CDD)
Guidance
POM
Plan
nin
g
Programming
Budgeting
Appropriations Act PB
Exe
cuti
on
OPFOR / SE
Asses
smen
tMCSHA
P&R (PA&E)
P&R ADC (P)P&R
ADC (R)
MCEIP
ME
Ts/M
ET
Ls
DR
RS
-MC
End of FY
Congressional Approval
Approved MCSCP
Approved MCEIP
Start of POM-2-Budget
Transition
MCSCP
Approved MCSHA
Approved Strategic
Plan (EF-21)
= MROC
Mid-Year Review
Front End Assessment /
Program Reviews
PEB outbriefsT/POM
Approval
POM Approval (EMROC)
MCCL
MCGL
MCSDD
Integrated Program
Assessment(IPA)
PMF
FY20+F
Y1
9
POM-18
FY17
PB-15
PB
-16
MROC Information
Update
DPGQDR
NSS
EF-21NDS
NMS
CMC CPG
AUG 2015
32
METs/METLs Role inP&R’s MC Strategic Health Assessment (MCSHA)
CD&I / CDD Force Develop. / CPM Implementation
-TFSD-MCT/MET/METL-UUNS/DUNS-CBA/MCEIP
CMC Strategic Guidance
POM & Budget Development
-Prog. Reviews-PEBs-PWGs-POM / T-POM
Building Blocks of a Balanced
Force Program Metrics / Analysis
POM and Budgetary re-alignments resulting from P&R’s execution cycle and MCSHA analytics impact
future force capability and resource development
Current and Future Capabilities Development
Acquisitions, Budget Strategies,
RDT&E, Fielding
Performance Results
Integrated relationships between capabilities development, future planned and current resources with performance indicators provide a Performance Management Framework (PMF)
MCTs/METs
AUG 2015 UNCLASSIFIED
MCSHA 2013
MCSHA 2014MCSHA 2015
How well did the USMC
execute the Budget?
Current “State” of the USMC
UNCLASSIFIED 33
MCTL Branch products:
1. USMC MCTIMS Task Master
2. HQMC CD&I SharePoint Platform
3. MCCDC / CD&I Website
https://mccdc.portal.usmc.mil/org/cdd/MID/MCTL/default.aspx
https://mctims.usmc.mil/TNRManual/TaskMaster/Pages/Home.aspx
http://www.mccdc.marines.mil/Units/MarineCorpsTaskList.aspxAUG 2015
34UNCLASSIFIED
QUESTIONS?
MARYROI GOLDMAN, CIVMCTL Branch Head(703) 432-8166 / DSN [email protected]
MARIO MARTINEZ, CIVMCTL Program Assistant(703) 432-8487 / DSN [email protected]
AUG 2015