1 migration and the global healthcare workforce: balancing competing demands peter scherer:...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Migration and the Global Healthcare Workforce: Balancing Competing
Demands
Peter Scherer: Counsellor,
Directorate for Employment, and Social Affairs
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
2
The Sources of Demand
The reasons some countries are net recruiters of health professionals lies in their domestic markets.
One of the main drivers seems to be the extent to which countries have restricted the number of places in tertiary institutions
Those which have held down training places are turning to foreign suppliers to compensate for their under-investment
3
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Prac
tisin
g ph
ysic
ians
per
1 m
illion
pop
ulat
ion
Austria Belgium Greece Switzerland
Canada Japan New Zealand United Kingdom
Countries that don’t or recently started to regulate medical school intake
Countries that regulate medical school intake
Impact of planning and market regimes on physician density
4
Graduation Rates
It is clear that many OECD countries are not training enough nurses or physicians to compensate for the outflow into other occupations and into retirement.
5
Graduated nurses as a percentage of practising nurses, 2000
7.2
7.2
6.2
5.8
4.8
4.6
4.3
3.9
3.9
3.5
3.2
3.1
2.7
2.5
2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Korea
Slovak Republic
Japan
Austria
Germany
Portugal
United States
Denmark
Norway
France
Mexico
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Australia
Canada
Proportion of nurses who graduated in 2000
6
Graduated physicians as a percentage of practising physicians, 2000
9.6
6.2
4.5
4
3.8
3.6
3.4
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.5
2.4
1.9
1.9
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Korea
Ireland
Austria
Australia
United States
Spain
Switzerland
Slovak Republic
Germany
Netherlands
Belgium
Canada
Mexico
Denmark
France
Portugal
Proportion of practising physicians who graduated in 2000
7
The variation in domestic supply
Although he data are only indicative (given definitional problems) the difference between the densities of doctors and nurses (as a percentage of the population) across member countries are striking.
Spain constitutes a notable paradox: there is high unemployment amongst Spanish nurses, and official policy is that there is a “surplus” and foreign recruitment is welcome.
Yet the density of nurses in that country is one of the lowest in the OECD
8
Nurse density, 2000
13,963
11,726
10,735
9,928
9,620
9,582
9,533
9,130
8,835
8,782
7,476
6,750
5,885
3,694
3,663
3,007
1,897
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
Ireland
Australia
Switzerland
Canada
Germany
New Zealand
Denmark
United States
Sweden
United Kingdom
Slovak Republic
France
Austria
Spain
Portugal
Korea
Mexico
Practising nurses per 1 million population
9
Physician density, 2000
4,482
4,051
3,855
3,829
3,683
3,510
3,419
3,294
3,263
3,259
3,176
3,041
2,642
2,443
2,232
2,220
2,095
2,005
1,933
1,295
1,102
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000
Greece
Italy
Belgium
Austria
Slovak Republic
Switzerland
Denmark
France
Spain
Germany
Portugal
Sweden
United States
Australia
New Zealand
Ireland
Canada
United Kingdom
Japan
Korea
Mexico
Practising physicians per 1 million population
10
Changes in Density
There is no apparent evidence that countries with higher density are reducing their nursing workforce (Canada is the exception)
Hence the sources of demand for foreign nurses need to be sought in areas other than “overall” shortages,
11
Change in nurse density from 1990 to 2000
11268
11103
11054
9294
9172
8986
8581
7775
5481
4131
2857
2793
1547
13963
9928 1
1726
9582
8835
9130
9533
8782
6750
5885
3694
3663
1897
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
Pra
ctis
ing
nu
rse
s p
er
1 m
illio
n p
op
ula
tion
1990
2000
12
Outflows from the profession
It is the tendency of nurses to leave the nursing workforce which is the perhaps the main driver of the perceived “shortages” to which employers respond,
In the slide which follows, the net inflow/outflow rate relates the absolute number of nurses in a particular age band in a specific year to that of the previous age group five years earlier.
13
Net inflow/outflow rates of nurses, 1996-2001
Age band
30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64
Austria 122 106 88 102 80 34 39
Belgium 92 89 87 89 86 67
Denmark 266 131 101 91 62 55 55
France 104 91 99 107 92 62 28
Germany 84 94 101 106 72 94 26
Italy 145 114 109 92 90 53 50
Netherlands 81 80 85 106 120 113 26
New Zealand 139 102 99 90 81 72 80
Spain 776 90 100 79 72 121 52
14
South African Case Study
Practitoners (Doctors, dentists,
pharmacists)Nurses and midwives
Registered in South Africa 1996 38,119 177,5202001 46,130 172,338
New graduates 2001 1,420 8,167
Proportion intending to practice abroad 2001 42%
Unfilled Vacancies 2001 4,222 32,734
South African Born Practising in Australia, Canada, US, NZ, UK 2001 8,921 6,884
UK recruitment, South African nurses 1998-1999 599
1999-2000 1,4602000-2001 1,0862001-2002 2,114
15
Flow chart of the production of health care
New graduatesImmigrantsRe-entrants
LeaversEmigrants
Retirees
Stock andproductivity
of physicians
Volume andVolume andquality of health carequality of health care
DerivedDemand
Supply
PatientsPatients
OutflowOutflow
InflowInflow
Stock andStock andproductivity productivity
of other health of other health care resourcescare resources
Supply
DerivedDemand
Policies on:• Education• Pay• Work conditions• Migration• Retirement
Stock andproductivity
of nurses
SKILL MIX
16
Principal axes of international mobility of health professionals (by country of birth)
17
Main message
Cross-border migration is just one aspect of normal movements in labour markets
The same issues of policies to improve retention which apply domestically apply to national policies
Excessive rates of movement indicate a malaise in employment conditions
In South African case, re-orienting training to address South African needs may help to reduce the role of the profession as a conduit for immediate migration
But the aim should be to encourage retention for a reasonable number of years, not prevent movement.