1 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review Part 2 of 2 2 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review JRB Approach Missed Approach/Departure begins at waypoint #1 and continues north in compliance with the Hudson River Exclusion at 1,000. JRB Approach Missed Approach/Departure begins at waypoint #1 and continues north in compliance with the Hudson River Exclusion at 1,000. #1#1 JRB Approach & Missed Approach 3 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review JRA Approach Design Specifics: Begins in same position as JRB. This allows for course reversal to final 5 Degree GPA used to avoid Obstacle penetrations Actual minima will be based on MAS obstacles MAP is 0.69nm from JRA with 2 degree offset MAS that aligns with Exclusion Route JRA Approach Design Specifics: Begins in same position as JRB. This allows for course reversal to final 5 Degree GPA used to avoid Obstacle penetrations Actual minima will be based on MAS obstacles MAP is 0.69nm from JRA with 2 degree offset MAS that aligns with Exclusion Route JRA Approach Path & Specifics 4 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review JRA Approach Path from Hudson 5 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review JRA Approach Path & TERPS surface 6 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review JRA Approach The MAS aligns with the Exclusion Route northbound. The MAS will have many obstacles that may affect DA. The final approach course will determine this figure. JRA Approach The MAS aligns with the Exclusion Route northbound. The MAS will have many obstacles that may affect DA. The final approach course will determine this figure. JRA Approach Path & Missed w/ Hudson 7 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review Going Forward 8 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review Going Forward: 1.Communication and coordination are critical. HAC maintains the position that AAG, HAC, FAA, and N90 should meet to discuss the initial designs 2.These designs should be provided to N90 for consideration in their resectorization activities 3.Issues on the following slides need to be asked and addressed: 9 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review JRB Approach Will airspace allow for the final approach path to be angled to the right? This will allow a MAS to incorporate less obstacles and help reduce the minima. JRB Approach Will airspace allow for the final approach path to be angled to the right? This will allow a MAS to incorporate less obstacles and help reduce the minima. Approach Path Going Forward Issues: JRB Approach Path Directions 10 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review Enroute Can IFR altitudes be established for IMC operations that would be deconflicted from adjacent airport traffic to allow IFR operations? Current minimum obstacle separations are 500 at best case. Therefore, 1000 would be a minimum with 2,000 or 1,500 in IMC ops.Enroute Going Forward Issues: Enroute 11 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review JRA Approach Can N90 accommodate an alternative approach path to JRA that does not require helicopters to fly south of Governors Island either on approach or missed approach for course reversal? JRA Approach Can N90 accommodate an alternative approach path to JRA that does not require helicopters to fly south of Governors Island either on approach or missed approach for course reversal? Going Forward Issues: JRA Approach Path Directions 12 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review Current Helicopter Routes Can N90 accommodate current helicopter routes that can be utilized in design? Current Helicopter Routes Can N90 accommodate current helicopter routes that can be utilized in design? Going Forward Issues: Current Helicopter Routes 13 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review Connection of Exclusion Routes Is there a mechanism to connect the two exclusion routes that could be used in design? Connection of Exclusion Routes Is there a mechanism to connect the two exclusion routes that could be used in design? Going Forward Issues: Connection of Hudson and East Rivers 14 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review Helicopter WAAS LPV BENEFITS Increased Safety due to position accuracy and containment Three Dimensional Predictable Path Significant Increase in Dispatch Reliability Reduction in Fuel & Environmental Impact Customer Comfort and Satisfaction 15 November 30, 2009 Q Project Review Questions? HUGHES PROPRIETARY