1 of 29 lcws’06, march 2006t. markiewicz for m. woods, slac lcws’06 bangalore march 12, 2006
TRANSCRIPT
1 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
http://www-project.slac.stanford.edu/ilc/testfac/ESA/esa.html
LCWS’06 BangaloreMarch 12, 2006
CCLRC LLNL QMUL U. of Bristol UMass Amherst
CERN Lancaster U. SLAC UC Berkeley U. of Oregon
DESY Manchester U. TEMF TU Darmstadt U. of Cambridge
KEK Notre Dame U. U. of Birmingham UCL
Collimator design, wakefields (T-480)BPM energy spectrometer (T-474)Synch Stripe energy spectrometer (T-475)IP BPMs/kickers—background studiesEMI (electro-magnetic interference)
PAC05 paper/poster: SLAC-PUB-11180, e-Print Archive: physics/0505171
ILC Beam Tests in End Station AILC Beam Tests in End Station A
2 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Beam Parameters at SLAC ESA and ILCBeam Parameters at SLAC ESA and ILC
Parameter SLAC ESA ILC-500
Repetition Rate 10 Hz 5 Hz
Energy 28.5 GeV 250 GeV
Bunch Charge 2.0 x 1010 2.0 x 1010
Bunch Length 300 m 300 m
Energy Spread 0.2% 0.1%
Bunches per train 1 (2*) 2820
Microbunch spacing - (20-400ns*) 337 ns
*possible, using undamped beam
3 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
SummarySummary
Funding from:i) SLAC ILC group, ii) UK, iii) DOE LCRD
3 test beam experiments have been approved: T-474, T-475, T-480
Commissioning Run January 4-9~20 people taking shifts (including 4 grad students) from SLAC, UC Berkeley, Notre Dame, U. of Oregon, UC London, Daresbury Lab
2006 Running schedule:ii) April 24 – May 8, 2006iii) July 3-17, 2006
T-474, T-475, T-480 and Bunch Length measurements in both periodsFONT-ESA & EMI testing in July
Plan for two 2-week runs in FY07
4 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
ESA Equipment Layout: ESA Equipment Layout: Now & FutureNow & Future
18 feet
BPMs used to commission BPM electronics Ceramic gap bunch length monitors w/ 3 rf readoutsOregon quartz fiber detector
Dipoles + Wiggler
Wakefield box Wire Scanners FONT-ESA BPM-Triplets
Collimator
Support Girders
black=nowblue=March’06green=July’06red=later
Upstream:
5 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Alcove rf BPMs(3 sets of bpm processors
to analyze data) 100GHz Bunch Length Detector
Hardware installed during January Hardware installed during January 2006 Commissioning Run2006 Commissioning Run
6 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Collimator wakefield box
Wire Scanner
Hardware installed during January Hardware installed during January 2006 Commissioning Run2006 Commissioning Run
7 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Precision energy measurements to 50-200 parts per million are needed for Higgs boson and top quark mass measurements. BPM (T-474) and synchrotron stripe (T-475) spectrometers will both be evaluated in a common 4-magnet chicane. These studies address achieving the ILC precision measurement goals: resolution, stabilty & systematics
T-474, 475: T-474, 475: Energy SpectrometersEnergy Spectrometers
8 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
T-474 and T-475T-474 and T-475
T-474 BPM Energy Spectrometer:PIs: Mike Hildreth (U. of Notre Dame) & Stewart Boogert (RHUL,UK)Collaborating Institutions: U. of Cambridge, Royal Holloway, SLAC, UC Berkeley, UC London, U. of Notre Dame
T-475 Synchrotron Stripe Energy Spectrometer:PI: Eric Torrence (U. of Oregon)Collaborating Institutions: SLAC, U. of Oregon
Prototype quartz fiber detector:8 100-micron fibers + 8 600-micron fibers w/ multi-anode PMT readout
9 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Collimators remove beam halo, but excite wakefields.Goal is to determine optimal collimator material and geometry. These studies address achieving theILC design luminosity.
T-480: Collimator WakefieldsT-480: Collimator WakefieldsApril, July 2006 runsApril, July 2006 runs
PIs: Steve Molloy (SLAC), (Steve replaces PT), Nigel Watson (U. of Birmingham, UK)Collaborating Institutions: U. of Birmingham, CCLRC-ASTeC + engineering, CERN, DESY, Manchester U., Lancaster U., SLAC, TEMF TU
=298mrad
=168mrad
r1 =3.8mm
r2 =1.4mm
4
1=/2 rad
2=168mrad
r1=3.8mm
r2=1.4mm
3
168mrad
r=1.4mm2
=/2rad
r=1.4mm1
Beam viewSide viewSlot
h=38 mm
38 m
m
7 mm
208mm
28mm
159mm
Collimator wakefield box installed in ESA.2 sandwiches, each holding 4 collimators, available.Collimators being provided by UK groups.Wakefield kick angle measurements provided by T-474 BPMs.
10 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
January 2006 Commissioning RunJanuary 2006 Commissioning Run
1. Infrastructure: • DAQ (both SCP and experimental—evolution from E-166)• Wire scanner for spotsize, emittance measurements• simple bunch length diagnostics w/ 3 rf detectors (10, 20 and 100 GHz)• Energy spread measurements with A-line synch lite monitor (SLM)• A-line commissioning for single bunch, low emittance beams→ full characterization of beam’s 6-dim phase space
2. T-474: BPM Energy spectrometer commissioning - new BPM electronics developed at UC Berkeley using existing rf bpms;
SIS waveform digitizers provided by UK
3. T-475: Synch. Stripe energy spectrometer- testing Oregon quartz fiber detector at A-Line SLM location
4. T-480: Collimator Wakefield Measurements, • commissioning ASSET collimator wakefield box; get beam cleanly
thru 4mm gap and take beam-based alignment data
11 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Oregon quartz fiber detector at A-line SLM locationfor T-475
DAQ Control at Counting House
January 2006 Commissioning RunJanuary 2006 Commissioning Run
e- beam
SR photons
12 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
DAQ Screens
13 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
LiTrack simulation for LiTrack simulation for achieving ILC parameters in ESAachieving ILC parameters in ESA
Bunch charge (1E10) 2.0DR bunch length (mm) 6.0DR energy spread (%) 0.074RTL Voltage (MV) 38RF phase 2-6 (deg) -10RF phase 10-20 (deg) -17.5Aline R56 (m) 00.465Aline T566 (m) 2.744
E/E=0.2%
z=300um
14 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Bunch Length Measurements in Bunch Length Measurements in January 2006 Commissioning RunJanuary 2006 Commissioning Run
2-d scan versus Linac injection phase and compressor voltage
Peak in 100 GHz signal
as Linac Injector Phase &
Compressor voltage
scanned, at lower
frequencies signal
correlates with intensity
only
100GHz 20GHz
10GHz Intensity
15 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Energy profile with SLM digitized(saturates at peak)
1.2% E/E
117-micron vertical spot
Beat Size and Energy Spread in Beat Size and Energy Spread in January 2006 Commissioning RunJanuary 2006 Commissioning Run
Energy profile with SLM digitized(saturates at peak)
1.2% E/E
Nominal setup had low energy tail. Optimizing Linac injection phase and compressor voltage for short buncheseliminates low energy tail and gives high energy tail.
Wire scanner measurement of vertical spotsize.
16 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Beam Emittance in A Line in Beam Emittance in A Line in January Commissioning RunJanuary Commissioning Run
Linac emittance with S28 wires
Q28 and wire scans for measuringhorizontal, vertical emittance in ESA
y ~ 4.0 e-05 ??x ~ 31. e-05 OK
• expect ~4x emittance growth in A-line due to synch. radiationand chromatic aberrations
• data was taken with wrong magnet config for A-line orbitand dispersion matching (→increased y-emittance?)
• vacuum problem at start of A-line may also increase y-emittance
17 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
BPM Electronics Commissioning BPM Electronics Commissioning during January 2006 Runduring January 2006 Run
T-474 commissioning results using new bpm processors to downmix signals to 70MHz and digitize with SIS waveform digitizers at 100MHz.
~5-micron bpm resolution achieved so far. Expect <1-micron resolution, so studying contributions from phase noise, angle jitter, fitting procedure …
18 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
T-474 plans for T-474 plans for April, July runsApril, July runs
For April install two spear girders with 2nd wire scanner and 2 new BPM triplets:– ILC Linac prototype BPMs being developed by C. Adolphsen, G.
Bowden, Z. Li (Location=3BPM3-5)– E158 ASSET BPMs (Location=3BPM9-11)– Future: new BPMs will be designed at UC London in collab. with SLAC
For July install interferometer for ILC Linac bpms
19 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Continued Plans for Continued Plans for April, July RunsApril, July Runs
• T-475T-475– continue studies with prototype detector at A-
line SLM location• need access to snip 1 or 2 fibers to provide for
background measurements and to increase gain on differential line driver
• T-480T-480– Wakefield study using T-474 BPMs
20 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
New Studies for New Studies for April, July RunsApril, July Runs
• Bunch Length StudiesBunch Length Studies– add 2nd 100GHz diode w/ WR10 waveguide (noise,
resolution, stability…)– partner with LCLS for bunch length studies in 100-500
micron range w/higher frequency detectors• (M. Ross, P. Emma, D. McCormick, S. Walston, …)
• EMI StudiesEMI Studies– Characterize EMI along ESA beamline using antennas
& fast 2.5GHz scope– Measure dependence on bunch charge, bunch length
• US-Japan funds for FY06 available– KEK—Y. Sugimoto, SLAC--G. Bower
21 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
• Feedback BPM survivability tests (Oxford U.):• Approximate rule of thumb:
– 1 pm error in BPM processor per charge absorbed or knocked out of strip
• Irradiate BPM in realistic environment, study:– noise on direct beam signals– long-term BPM stability and performance
• Also, plan to do detailed EM modelling of BPM to simulate the effect of backgrounds on performance
FONT@ESA: FONT@ESA: July RunJuly Run
22 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Feedback BPM Hit Dependence on Machine Parameter Set
High LumiScheme14
Low PScheme13
Large YScheme12
Low QScheme11
NominalScheme10
USSCScheme9
1 TeV TESLA
Scheme 8
High LumiScheme7
Low PScheme6
Large YScheme5
Low QScheme4
NominalScheme3
USSCScheme2
500 GeV TESLA
Scheme 1# pairs hitting FB BPM
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S14n
scheme
hits
2mrad 20mrad93443
23 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Pairs Simulated at ESA w/ Spray Beam
• Reproduce the pair backgrounds predicted in the IR at ESA by firing 30 GeV beam into a fixed-target ‘radiator’ – 2 radiator options:
• Thick target in Beam Switch Yard (BSY)• Thin target in ESA
Output of simulation shows range of energies between 0 and 30GeV
24 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Mechanical mock-up of forward material in the ILC IR
BeamCal plus BPM and QD0 Mechanical Substitute
–Quartz Cerenkov on mover to monitor pair flux–removable Pb glass block for normalization–Beamcal/BPM Mockup
25 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
Other Tests Under DiscussionOther Tests Under Discussion
1. Other BPM test stations
2. More Bunch length and longitudinal profile measurements (for LCLS)• electro-optic, Smith-Purcell, coherent transition radiation, other?
• Initial measurements are using rf detectors at a ceramic gap in a few frequency bands from 10GHz-100GHz
• 300-micron ILC bunch length is same as LCLS after 1st bunch compressor• ESA is a good place to commission diagnostics for this
3. Spray beam or fixed target to mimic pairs, beamsstrahlung, disrupted beam for testing synchrotron stripe energy spectrometer or BEAMCAL
4. IR Mockup?• Mimick beamline geometry at IP within ±5 meters in z and ±20 cm radially
5. Single Particles (electrons, photons, pions) 1-25 GeV particles with 1 or less particles/bunch at 10Hz for ILC Detector tests
26 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
ESA has now been revalidated for using primary beams. A major consideration was reviewing radiation physics requirements and the ESA PPS (personnel protection system).
The ESA PPS does not meet modern standards for redundancy of sub-system components. Additionally, system components are old and some are past their rated service life.
The cost estimate for replacing the ESA PPSIs $500K
Will be requesting to run with the existing PPS thru the end of FY08 (end of PEP-II era). ESA
running beyond that would require a new PPS.
Safety Reviews & PPSSafety Reviews & PPSRelevant for post 2007 runsRelevant for post 2007 runs
27 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
ESA Beam Tests in LCLS Era?ESA Beam Tests in LCLS Era?
The ESA program is NOT compatible with LCLS without effort– Some initial discussions with SLAC management have begun
LCLS will use last 1/3 of SLAC Linac: 14 GeV beam, 1 nC, 120 Hz
•controls issues•low bunch charge w/ LCLS gun specs•pulsed magnets to share LCLS beam•Would need PPS upgrade
28 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
ILC at SABER?South Arc Beam Exp. Region
•Need to run front 2/3 of linac ($)•Separate bypass line•Separate pulse compressor
29 of 29T. Markiewicz for M. Woods, SLAC LCWS’06, March 2006
SummarySummary
We have a strong collaboration for important ILC beam tests, addressing ILC luminosity and ILC precision
Strong support from SLAC’s ILC group, UK collaborators and others
3 test beam experiments have been approved and are in progress; additional ones are in preparation or under study
Successful 5-day commissioning run earlier this month; 2 additional runs scheduled before end of July. Plans to continue into FY07 andFY08, parasitic with PEP-II operation.