1 of 42 part iii the core of macroeconomic theory © 2012 pearson education, inc. publishing as...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
1 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Prepared by: Fernando Quijano & Shelly Tefft
CASE FAIR OSTER
P R I N C I P L E S O F
MACROECONOMICST E N T H E D I T I O N
2 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
3 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
CHAPTER OUTLINE
9The Government and Fiscal Policy
Government in the EconomyGovernment Purchases (G), Net Taxes (T), and Disposable Income (Yd)
The Determination of Equilibrium Output (Income)
Fiscal Policy at Work: Multiplier EffectsThe Government Spending MultiplierThe Tax MultiplierThe Balanced-Budget Multiplier
The Federal BudgetThe Budget in 2009Fiscal Policy Since 1993: The Clinton, Bush, and Obama AdministrationsThe Federal Government Debt
The Economy’s Influence on the Government Budget
Automatic Stabilizers and DestabilizersFull-Employment Budget
Looking Ahead
Appendix A: Deriving the Fiscal Policy Multipliers
Appendix B: The Case in Which Tax Revenues Depend on Income
4 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
fiscal policy The government’s spending and taxing policies.
monetary policy The behavior of the Federal Reserve concerning the nation’s money supply.
5 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
discretionary fiscal policy Changes in taxes or spending that are the result of deliberate changes in government policy.
net taxes (T) Taxes paid by firms and households to the government minus transfer payments made to households by the government.
disposable, or after-tax, income (Yd) Total income minus net taxes: Y − T.
disposable income ≡ total income − net taxes
Yd ≡ Y − T
Government in the Economy
Government Purchases (G), Net Taxes (T), and Disposable Income (Yd)
6 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
FIGURE 9.1 Adding Net Taxes (T) and Government Purchases (G) to the Circular Flow of Income
Government in the Economy
Government Purchases (G), Net Taxes (T), and Disposable Income (Yd)
7 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
The disposable income (Yd) of households must end up as either consumption (C) or saving (S). Thus,
Y C Sd
Y T C S
Y C S T
Government in the Economy
Government Purchases (G), Net Taxes (T), and Disposable Income (Yd)
Because disposable income is aggregate income (Y) minus net taxes (T), we can write another identity:
By adding T to both sides:
Planned aggregate expenditure (AE) is the sum of consumption spending by households (C), planned investment by business firms (I), and government purchases of goods and services (G).
GICAE
8 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
budget deficit The difference between what a government spends and what it collects in taxes in a given period: G − T.
budget deficit ≡ G − T
Government in the Economy
Government Purchases (G), Net Taxes (T), and Disposable Income (Yd)
9 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
To modify our aggregate consumption function to incorporate disposable income instead of before-tax income, instead of C = a + bY, we write
C = a + bYd
or
C = a + b(Y − T)
Our consumption function now has consumption depending on disposable income instead of before-tax income.
Government in the Economy
Government Purchases (G), Net Taxes (T), and Disposable Income (Yd)
Adding Taxes to the Consumption Function
10 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
The government can affect investment behavior through its tax treatment of depreciation and other tax policies.
Government in the Economy
Government Purchases (G), Net Taxes (T), and Disposable Income (Yd)
Planned Investment
11 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Y = C + I + G
TABLE 9.1 Finding Equilibrium for I = 100, G = 100, and T = 100
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Output(Income)
Y
NetTaxes
T
DisposableIncomeYd ≡Y T
ConsumptionSpending
C = 100 + .75 Yd
SavingS
Yd – C
PlannedInvestmentSpending
I
GovernmentPurchases
G
PlannedAggregate
Expenditure C + I + G
UnplannedInventoryChange
Y (C + I + G)
Adjustmentto Disequi-
librium
300 100 200 250 50 100 100 450 150 Output ↑
500 100 400 400 0 100 100 600 100 Output ↑
700 100 600 550 50 100 100 750 50 Output ↑
900 100 800 700 100 100 100 900 0 Equilibrium
1,100 100 1,000 850 150 100 100 1,050 + 50 Output ↓
1,300 100 1,200 1,000 200 100 100 1,200 + 100 Output ↓
1,500 100 1,400 1,150 250 100 100 1,350 + 150 Output ↓
Government in the Economy
The Determination of Equilibrium Output (Income)
12 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
FIGURE 9.2 Finding Equilibrium Output/Income Graphically
Because G and I are both fixed at 100, the aggregate expenditure function is the new consumption function displaced upward by I + G = 200.Equilibrium occurs at Y = C + I + G = 900.
Government in the Economy
The Determination of Equilibrium Output (Income)
13 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
saving/investment approach to equilibrium:
S + T = I + G
To derive this, we know that in equilibrium, aggregate output (income) (Y) equals planned aggregate expenditure (AE). By definition, AE equals C + I + G, and by definition, Y equals C + S + T.Therefore, at equilibrium:
C + S + T = C + I + G
Subtracting C from both sides leaves:
S + T = I + G
Government in the Economy
The Determination of Equilibrium Output (Income)
The Saving/Investment Approach to Equilibrium
14 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
At this point, we are assuming that the government controls G and T. In this section, we will review three multipliers:
Government spending multiplier
Tax multiplier
Balanced-budget multiplier
Fiscal Policy at Work: Multiplier Effects
15 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
1government spending multiplier
MPS
government spending multiplier The ratio of the change in the equilibrium level of output to a change in government spending.
Fiscal Policy at Work: Multiplier Effects
The Government Spending Multiplier
16 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
TABLE 9.2 Finding Equilibrium after a Government Spending Increase of 50 (G Has Increased from 100 in Table 9.1 to 150 Here)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Output(Income)
Y
NetTaxes
T
DisposableIncomeYd ≡Y T
ConsumptionSpending
C = 100 + .75 Yd
SavingS
Yd – C
PlannedInvestmentSpending
I
GovernmentPurchases
G
PlannedAggregate
Expenditure C + I + G
UnplannedInventoryChange
Y (C + I + G)
Adjustmentto
Disequilibrium
300 100 200 250 50 100 150 500 200 Output ↑
500 100 400 400 0 100 150 650 150 Output ↑
700 100 600 550 50 100 150 800 100 Output ↑
900 100 800 700 100 100 150 950 50 Output ↑
1,100 100 1,000 850 150 100 150 1,100 0 Equilibrium
1,300 100 1,200 1,000 200 100 150 1,250 + 50 Output ↓
Fiscal Policy at Work: Multiplier Effects
The Government Spending Multiplier
17 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
FIGURE 9.3 The GovernmentSpending MultiplierIncreasing government spending by 50 shifts the AE function up by 50. As Y rises in response, additional consumption is generated.Overall, the equilibrium level of Y increases by 200, from 900 to 1,100.
Fiscal Policy at Work: Multiplier Effects
The Government Spending Multiplier
18 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
tax multiplier The ratio of change in the equilibrium level of output to a change in taxes.
tax multiplier MPC
MPS
YM P S
( in itia l in c rease in ag g reg a te ex p en d itu re )
1
1( )
MPCY T MPC T
MPS MPS
Fiscal Policy at Work: Multiplier Effects
The Tax Multiplier
Because the initial change in aggregate expenditure caused by a tax change of ∆T is (−∆T × MPC), we can solve for the tax multiplier by substitution:
Because a tax cut will cause an increase in consumption expenditures and output and a tax increase will cause a reduction in consumption expenditures and output, the tax multiplier is a negative multiplier:
19 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
balanced-budget multiplier The ratio of change in the equilibrium level of output to a change in government spending where the change in government spending is balanced by a change in taxes so as not to create any deficit. The balanced-budget multiplier is equal to 1: The change in Y resulting from the change in G and the equal change in T are exactly the same size as the initial change in G or T.
1balanced-budget multiplier
Fiscal Policy at Work: Multiplier Effects
The Balanced-Budget Multiplier
20 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
TABLE 9.3 Finding Equilibrium after a Balanced-Budget Increase in G and T of 200 Each (Both G and T Have Increased from 100 in Table 9.1 to 300 Here)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
Output(Income)
Y
NetTaxes
T
DisposableIncomeYd ≡Y T
ConsumptionSpending
C = 100 + .75 Yd
PlannedInvestmentSpending
I
GovernmentPurchases
G
PlannedAggregate
Expenditure C + I + G
UnplannedInventoryChange
Y (C + I + G)
Adjustmentto
Disequilibrium
500 300 200 250 100 300 650 150 Output ↑
700 300 400 400 100 300 800 100 Output ↑
900 300 600 550 100 300 950 50 Output ↑
1,100 300 800 700 100 300 1,100 0 Equilibrium
1,300 300 1,000 850 100 300 1,250 + 50 Output ↓
1,500 300 1,200 1,000 100 300 1,400 + 100 Output ↓
Fiscal Policy at Work: Multiplier Effects
The Balanced-Budget Multiplier
21 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
TABLE 9.4 Summary of Fiscal Policy Multipliers
Policy Stimulus MultiplierFinal Impact onEquilibrium Y
Government spendingmultiplier
Increase or decrease in thelevel of governmentpurchases: ∆G
Tax multiplier Increase or decrease in thelevel of net taxes: ∆T
Balanced-budgetmultiplier
Simultaneous balanced-budgetincrease or decrease in thelevel of government purchasesand net taxes: ∆G = ∆T
1
1
M P S
M P C
M P S
1 G
MPS
MPC
TMPS
G
Fiscal Policy at Work: Multiplier Effects
The Balanced-Budget Multiplier
22 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Fiscal Policy at Work: Multiplier Effects
The Balanced-Budget Multiplier
A Warning
Although we have added government, the story told about the multiplier is still incomplete and oversimplified.
We have been treating net taxes (T) as a lump-sum, fixed amount, whereas in practice, taxes depend on income.
Appendix B to this chapter shows that the size of the multiplier is reduced when we make the more realistic assumption that taxes depend on income.
We continue to add more realism and difficulty to our analysis in the chapters that follow.
23 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
federal budget The budget of the federal government.
The “budget” is really three different budgets:
It is a political document that dispenses favors to certain groups or regions and places burdens on others.
It is a reflection of goals the government wants to achieve.
The budget may be an embodiment of some beliefs about how (if at all) the government should manage the macroeconomy.
The Federal Budget
24 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
TABLE 9.5 Federal Government Receipts and Expenditures, 2009 (Billions of Dollars)
Amount Percentage of TotalCurrent receipts
Personal income taxes 828.7 37.2Excise taxes and customs duties 92.3 4.1Corporate income taxes 231.0 10.4Taxes from the rest of the world 12.3 0.6Contributions for social insurance 949.1 42.7Interest receipts and rents and royalties 48.2 2.2Current transfer receipts from business and persons 68.1 3.1Current surplus of government enterprises − 4.9 − 0.2
Total 2,224.9 100.0Current Expenditures
Consumption expenditures 986.4 28.6Transfer payments to persons 1596.1 46.2Transfer payments to the rest of the world 61.7 1.8Grants-in-aid to state and local governments 476.6 13.8Interest payments 272.3 7.9Subsidies 58.2 1.7
Total 3,451.3 100.0Net federal government saving—surplus (+) or deficit (−)
(Total current receipts − Total current expenditures) − 1,226.4
The Federal Budget
The Budget in 2009
25 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
federal surplus (+) or deficit (−) Federal government receipts minus expenditures.
The Federal Budget
The Budget in 2009
26 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
FIGURE 9.4 Federal Personal Income Taxes as a Percentage of Taxable Income, 1993 I–2010 I
The Federal Budget
Fiscal Policy Since 1993: The Clinton, Bush, and Obama Administrations
27 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
FIGURE 9.5 Federal Government Consumption Expenditures as a Percentage of GDP and Federal Transfer Payments and Grants-in-Aid as a Percentage of GDP, 1993 I–2010 I
The Federal Budget
Fiscal Policy Since 1993: The Clinton, Bush, and Obama Administrations
28 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
FIGURE 9.6 The Federal Government Surplus (+) or Deficit (–) as a Percentage of GDP, 1993 I–2010 I
The Federal Budget
Fiscal Policy Since 1993: The Clinton, Bush, and Obama Administrations
29 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
federal debt The total amount owed by the federal government.
privately held federal debt The privately held (non-government-owned) debt of the U.S. government.
The Federal Budget
The Federal Government Debt
30 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
FIGURE 9.7 The Federal Government Debt as a Percentage of GDP, 1993 I–2010 1
The Federal Budget
The Federal Government Debt
31 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
automatic stabilizers Revenue and expenditure items in the federal budget that automatically change with the state of the economy in such a way as to stabilize GDP.
fiscal drag The negative effect on the economy that occurs when average tax rates increase because taxpayers have moved into higher income brackets during an expansion.
The Economy’s Influence on the Government Budget
Automatic Stabilizers and Destabilizers
automatic destabilizer Revenue and expenditure items in the federal budget that automatically change with the state of the economy in such a way as to destabilize GDP.
32 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
E C O N O M I C S I N P R A C T I C E
Governments Disagree on How Much More Spending Is Needed
The U.S. economy is intertwined with the rest of the world.
For that reason, U.S. government leaders are concerned not only with their own fiscal policies but also with those of other governments (and vice versa).
President Obama was among the strongest advocates of additional stimulus by governments in a June 2010 summit of the G-20.
Spending Fight at G-20
The Wall Street Journal
33 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
full-employment budget What the federal budget would be if the economy were producing at the full-employment level of output.
structural deficit The deficit that remains at full employment.
cyclical deficit The deficit that occurs because of a downturn in the business cycle.
The Economy’s Influence on the Government Budget
Full-Employment Budget
34 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Looking Ahead
We have now seen how households, firms, and the government interact in the goods market, how equilibrium output (income) is determined, and how the government uses fiscal policy to influence the economy.
In the following two chapters, we analyze the money market and monetary policy—the government’s other major tool for influencing the economy.
35 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
automatic destabilizers
automatic stabilizers
balanced-budget multiplier
budget deficit
cyclical deficit
discretionary fiscal policy
disposable, or after-tax, income (Yd)
federal budget
federal debt
federal surplus (+) or deficit (−)
fiscal drag
fiscal policy
full-employment budget
government spending multiplier
monetary policy
net taxes (T)
privately held federal debt
structural deficit
tax multiplier
1. Disposable income Yd ≡ Y − T
2. AE ≡ C + I + G
3. Government budget deficit ≡ G − T
4. Equilibrium in an economy with a government: Y = C + I + G
5. Saving/investment approach to equilibrium in an economy with a government: S + T = I + G
6. Government spending multiplier ≡
7. Tax multiplier ≡
8. Balanced-budget multiplier ≡ 1
MPC
MPS
MPS
1
R E V I E W T E R M S A N D C O N C E P T S
36 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Y C I G
C a b Y T ( )
Y a b Y T I G ( )Y a bY bT I G
Y bY a I G bT Y b a I G bT( )1
)(1
1bTGIa
b Y
CHAPTER 9 APPENDIX A
Deriving the Fiscal Policy Multipliers
The Government Spending and Tax Multipliers
We can derive the multiplier algebraically using our hypothetical consumption function:
The equilibrium condition is
By substituting for C, we get
This equation can be rearranged to yield
Now solve for Y by dividing through by (1 − b):
37 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
It is easy to show formally that the balanced-budget multiplier = 1.
Gincrease in spending:( )C T MPC − decrease in spending:( )G T MPC = net increase in spending
In a balanced-budget increase, G = T; so we can substitute:
net initial increase in spending:
G − G (MPC) = G (1 − MPC)
CHAPTER 9 APPENDIX A
Deriving the Fiscal Policy Multipliers
The Balanced-Budget Multiplier
38 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
1( )Y G MPS G
MPS
Because MPS = (1 − MPC), the net initial increase in spending is:
G (MPS)
We can now apply the expenditure multiplier to this net initial increase in spending:
MPS
1
CHAPTER 9 APPENDIX A
Deriving the Fiscal Policy Multipliers
The Balanced-Budget Multiplier
Thus, the final total increase in the equilibrium level of Y is just equal to the initial balanced increase in G and T.
39 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
TYYd
)3/1200( YYYd
YYYd 3/1200
dYC 75.100
)3/1200(75.100 YYC
FIGURE 9B.1 The Tax Function
CHAPTER 9 APPENDIX B
The Case in Which Tax Revenues Depend on Income
This graph shows net taxes (taxes minus transfer payments) as a function of aggregate income.
40 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
When taxes are strictly lump-sum (T = 100) and do not depend on income, the aggregate expenditure function is steeper than when taxes depend on income.
FIGURE 9B.2 Different Tax Systems
GICY
100 .75( 200 1/3 ) 100 100Y Y YI GC
4505.
5.450
1001002515075.100
Y
YY
YYY
CHAPTER 9 APPENDIX B
The Case in Which Tax Revenues Depend on Income
41 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
C a b Y T ( )
0C a bY bT btY
0( )C a b Y T tY
0Y a bY bT btY I G
C
Yb b t
a I G bT
1
1 0( )
CHAPTER 9 APPENDIX B
The Government Spending and Tax Multipliers Algebraically
The Case in Which Tax Revenues Depend on Incomes
Through substitution we get
Solving for Y:
42 of 42
PAR
T I
II T
he C
ore
of M
acro
econ
omic
The
ory
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
1
1 b bt
CHAPTER 9 APPENDIX B
The Government Spending and Tax Multipliers Algebraically
The Case in Which Tax Revenues Depend on Incomes
This means that a $1 increase in G or I (holding a and T0 constant) will increase the equilibrium level of Y by
Holding a, I, and G constant, a fixed or lump-sum tax cut (a cut in T0) will increase the equilibrium level of income by
btb
b
1