1. propositions a proposition is a declarative sentence that is either true or false. examples of...
TRANSCRIPT
2
PropositionsA proposition is a declarative sentence that is either
true or false.Examples of propositions:
The Moon is made of green cheese. Trenton is the capital of New Jersey. Toronto is the capital of Canada. 1 + 0 = 1 0 + 0 = 2
Examples that are not propositions. Sit down! What time is it? x + 1 = 2 x + y = z
3
Propositional Logic (or Calculus)Constructing Propositions
Propositional Variables: p, q, r, s, …The proposition that is always true is denoted
by T and the proposition that is always false is denoted by F.
Compound Propositions: constructed from other propositions using logical connectives Negation ¬ Conjunction ∧ Disjunction ∨ Implication → Biconditional ↔
4
Compound Propositions: NegationThe negation of a proposition p is denoted by ¬p and has this truth table:
Example: If p denotes “The earth is round” then ¬p denotes “It is not the case that the earth is round,” or more simply “The earth is not round.”
p ¬p
T F
F T
5
ConjunctionThe conjunction of propositions p and q is
denoted by p ∧ q and has this truth table:
Example: If p denotes “I am at home” and q denotes “It is raining” then p ∧q denotes “I am at home and it is raining.”
p q p ∧ q T T T
T F F
F T F
F F F
6
DisjunctionThe disjunction of propositions p and q is
denoted by p ∨q and has this truth table:
Example: If p denotes “I am at home” and q denotes “It is raining” then p ∨q denotes “I am at home or it is raining.”
p q p ∨qT T T
T F T
F T T
F F F
7
The Connective Or in EnglishIn English “or” has two distinct meanings.
Inclusive Or: For p ∨q to be T, either p or q or both must be T
Example: “CS202 or Math120 may be taken as a prerequisite.” Meaning: take either one or both
Exclusive Or (Xor). In p⊕q , either p or q but not both must be TExample: “Soup or salad comes with this entrée.” Meaning: do not expect to get both soup and salad
p q p ⊕qT T F
T F T
F T T
F F F
8
ImplicationIf p and q are propositions, then p →q is a conditional
statement or implication, which is read as “if p, then q ”p is the hypothesis (antecedent or premise) and q is the
conclusion (or consequence).
Example: If p denotes “It is raining” and q denotes “The streets are wet” then p →q denotes “If it is raining then streets are wet.”
p q p →qT T T
T F F
F T T
F F T
9
Understanding ImplicationIn p →q there does not need to be any
connection between p and q. The meaning of p →q depends only on the truth
values of p and q. Examples of valid but counterintuitive
implications:“If the moon is made of green cheese, then you
have more money than Bill Gates” -- True“If Juan has a smartphone, then 2 + 3 = 6” --
False if Juan does have a smartphone, True if he does NOT
10
Understanding ImplicationView logical conditional as an obligation or
contract:“If I am elected, then I will lower taxes”“If you get 100% on the final, then you will earn an
A”If the politician is elected and does not lower
taxes, then he or she has broken the campaign pledge. Similarly for the professor. This corresponds to the case where p is T and q
is F.
11
Different Ways of Expressing p →q if p, then qif p, qp implies q q if p q when pq whenever pNote: (p only if q) ≡ (q if p) ≢ (q only if p)
It is raining → streets are wet: TIt is raining only if streets are wet: TStreets are wet if it is raining: TStreets are wet only if it’s raining: F
q follows from pq unless ¬p p only if q p is sufficient for q q is necessary for p
12
Sufficient versus NecessaryExample 1:
p →q : get 100% on final → earn A in classp is sufficient for q:
getting 100% on final is sufficient for earning A
q is necessary for p: earning A is necessary for getting 100% on final
Counterintuitive in English: “Necessary” suggests a precondition Example is sequential
Example 2:Nobel laureate → is intelligentBeing intelligent is necessary for being Nobel
laureateBeing a Nobel laureate is sufficient for being
intelligent (better if expressed as: implies)
13
Converse, Inverse, and ContrapositiveFrom p →q we can form new conditional
statements .q →p is the converse of p →q ¬ p → ¬ q is the inverse of p →q¬q → ¬ p is the contrapositive of p →q
How are these statements related to the original?
How are they related to each other?Are any of them equivalent?
14
Converse, Inverse, and ContrapositiveExample:
it’s raining → streets are wet1. converse: streets are wet → it’s raining2. inverse: it’s not raining → streets are not wet3. contrapositive: streets are not wet → it’s not
raining
only 3 is equivalent to original statement1 and 2 are not equivalent to original statement:
streets could be wet for other reasons1 and 2 are equivalent to each other
15
BiconditionalIf p and q are propositions, then we can form the
biconditional proposition p ↔q, read as “p if and only if q ”
Example: If p denotes “You can take a flight” and q denotes “You buy a ticket” then p ↔q denotes “You can take a flight if and only if you buy a ticket”True only if you do both or neitherDoing only one or the other makes the proposition
false
p q p ↔q
T T T
T F F
F T F
F F T
16
Expressing the BiconditionalAlternative ways to say “p if and only if q”:
p is necessary and sufficient for qif p then q, and converselyp iff q
17
Compound Propositionsconjunction, disjunction, negation, conditionals,
and biconditionals can be combined into arbitrarily complex compound proposition
Any proposition can become a term inside another propositionPropositions can be nested arbitrarily
Example: p, q, r, t are simple propositionsp ∨q , r ∧t , r →t are compound propositions
using logical connectives(p ∨q) ∧ t and (p ∨q) →t are compound
propositions formed by nesting
18
Precedence of Logical Operators
Operator Precedence
1
23
45
With multiple operators we need to know the orderTo reduce number of parentheses use precedence rules
Example: • p ∨q → ¬ r is equivalent to (p ∨q) → ¬ r• If the intended meaning is p ∨(q → ¬ r ) then
parentheses must be used
19
Truth Tables of Compound PropositionsConstruction of a truth table:Rows
One for every possible combination of values of all propositional variables
ColumnsOne for the compound proposition (usually at
far right)One for each expression in the compound
proposition as it is built up by nesting