1 results of 2010/2015 post-cair ozone source apportionment modeling august 2005 oar/oaqps/emad/aqmg
TRANSCRIPT
1
Results of 2010/2015 Post-CAIR Ozone Source Apportionment Modeling
August 2005
OAR/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG
2
Ozone Source Apportionment Modeling Results
• The following slides show the relative contribution of different groups of emissions sources to ozone levels at times and places where exceedances of the 8-hour standard are projected to occur in 2010 and 2015. This information can be useful in considering potential control strategies. However, a key consideration in weighing alternative strategies is which types of emissions are cost effective and practical to control, a consideration not addressed by the source apportionment modeling.
3
What is source apportionment in the context of AQ modeling?
• The Comprehensive Air Quality Model w/ Extensions (CAMx) contains a source apportionment tool which can be used to estimate how emissions from individual source areas and regions affect modeled ozone concentrations over space and time.
• This is achieved by using multiple tracer species to track the fate of ozone precursor emissions (VOC and NOx) and the ozone formation caused by these emissions within a CAMx simulation.
4
How was source apportionment used in this particular application?
• Two base cases were considered, both based on the Clean Air Interstate Rule CAMx ozone modeling. For more information on CAIR-specific ozone source apportionment, please see the CAIR modeling Technical Support Document– 2010 projection, after application of CAIR controls
– 2015 projection, after application of CAIR controls
• This analysis used the Anthropogenic Precursor Culpability Assessment (APCA) option for the CAIR source apportionment modeling.
– Allocates all ozone production to manmade precursor emissions, when interaction between manmade emissions and biogenic emissions.
5
• Contributions were calculated from 39 source areas:– 37 eastern US States within the modeling domain
– Canada
– Gulf of Mexico
• Contributions were calculated from 6 major source sectors:– EGU Point,
– Non-EGU Point,
– Stationary Area,
– On-Road Mobile,
– Non-Road Mobile
– Wildfire emissions (generally shown to be negligible)
How was source apportionment used in this particular application?
6
• Source area/sector contibutions were calculated over those nonattainment areas that are projected to be residual nonattainment areas in the 2010 and 2015 future year modeling:– 16 projected post-CAIR ozone nonattainment areas in 2010
– 6 projected post-CAIR ozone nonattainment areas in 2015
– See next slide for a map of the specified receptor regions
• Modeling source apportionment results can be summarized via multiple metrics. This analysis focuses on a single metric: episodic-average contribution over only those time periods in which the model projects future 8-hour ozone exceedances.
• NOx and VOC emissions were tracked separately but combined in the final analysis.
How was source apportionment used in this particular application?
7
8
2010 Results• Each of the next 16 plots provides information about the source sectors and
source regions that are estimated to be contributing to residual nonattainment in 2010 over various eastern U.S. areas.
• Pie chart:– Shows average contribution to model ozone “exceedances”
• (i.e., 8-hour ozone concentrations >= 85 ppb)
– 18 different “contributors”: 6 source sectors x 3 region types. • For simplification purposes, the 39 source areas were subjectively aggregated into three
types of regions for each receptor: “local”, “nearby”, and “other”. The specific definitions of the regions associated with each receptor are listed on the last slide.
• Top bar chart – Percentage Contribution by State– Only top eight contributing States are plotted
• Bottom bar chart – Percentage Contribution by Source Sector
9
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Atlanta Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
GA-MV39%
GA-NR14%
GA-EGU9%
GA-NEGU7%
GA-ST6%
Nearby-MV5%
Other-MV3%
Other-NR3%
Nearby-NR3%
Other-EGU2%
Other-NEGU2%
Nearby-EGU2%
Other-ST1%
Nearby-ST1%
GA-AV1%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Nearby-NEGU3%
Percentage Contribution by State: Atlanta nonattainment area
01020304050607080
GA AL TN KY SC NC TX IL
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Atlanta nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
EGU Point(EGU)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
10
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Baltimore Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
MD-MV29%
MD-NR16%
Other-MV6%
Other-NR6%
Nearby-MV6%
MD-NEGU5%
MD-ST4%
MD-EGU4%
Nearby-NR4%
Other-EGU3%
Nearby-EGU3%
Other-NEGU3%
Other-ST2%
Nearby-ST2%
MD-AV1%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Nearby-NEGU5%
Percentage Contribution by State: Baltimore nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
MD PA VA OH IL WV NC IN
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Baltimore nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
11
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Beaumont/Pt Arthur Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
TX-NEGU21%
TX-NR16%
Nearby-NEGU11%Nearby-NR
10%
TX-MV8%
Other-MV6%
Other-NEGU5%
Nearby-ST4%
Nearby-MV3%
TX-ST3%
Other-EGU3%
Nearby-EGU2%
TX-EGU2%
Other-ST1%
TX-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Other-NR5%
Percentage Contribution by State: Beaumont-Port Arthur nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
TX LA AR MS TN AL IL MO
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Beaumont-Port Arthur nonattainment area
05
10152025303540
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
On-RoadMobile(MV)
StationaryArea (ST)
EGU Point(EGU)
AverageFires (AV)
12
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Buffalo Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
Canada-NR28%
Canada-NEGU14%
Canada-MV11%
Other-NR10%
Other-MV9%
Other-EGU7%
Other-NEGU5%
NY-NR3%
Other-ST3%
NY-MV3%
NY-ST1%
NY-EGU1%
NY-NEGU0%
Nearby-MV0%
Canada-EGU0%
Nearby-NR0%
Nearby-NEGU0%
Canada-ST6%
Percentage Contribution by State: Buffalo nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
CN NY WI MI KS IL IA MO
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Buffalo nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
EGU Point(EGU)
AverageFires (AV)
13
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Chicago Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
IL-MV15%
IL-NR14%
IL-NEGU8%
Other-MV8%
Other-NR8%
Nearby-NEGU8%
IL-EGU6%
Nearby-MV5%
Other-EGU5%
Other-NEGU5%
Nearby-EGU4%
Other-ST3%
IL-ST3%
Nearby-ST2%
IL-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Nearby-NR7%
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Chicago nonattainment area
05
101520253035
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
Percentage Contribution by State: Chicago nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
IL IN OH MI MO PA WI TX
14
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Cleveland Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
OH-NR19%
OH-MV16%
Other-MV8%
Other-NR7%
Nearby-MV7%
OH-ST5%
OH-EGU5%
Nearby-EGU5%
Nearby-NEGU5%
Other-NEGU5%
Other-EGU4%
OH-NEGU4%
Other-ST2%
Nearby-ST2%
OH-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Nearby-NR5%
Percentage Contribution by State: Cleveland nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
OH PA MI IL IN CN MO VA
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Cleveland nonattainment area
05
101520253035
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
On-RoadMobile(MV)
EGU Point(EGU)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
15
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Dallas Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
TX-MV34%
TX-NR18%
TX-NEGU12%
TX-EGU9%
TX-ST5%
Other-MV4%
Other-NEGU3%
Nearby-NEGU2%
Other-EGU2%
Nearby-NR2%
Nearby-ST2%
Nearby-MV2%
Other-ST1%
Nearby-EGU1%
TX-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Other-NR4%
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Dallas-Fort Worth nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
Percentage Contribution by State: Dallas nonattainment area
0
20
40
60
80
100
TX LA AR OH TN IL KY MO
16
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Detroit Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
MI-MV23%
MI-NR14%
Other-NR10%
Other-MV10%
Other-NEGU7%
MI-NEGU7%
MI-ST6%
MI-EGU4%
Nearby-NR3%
Other-ST3%
Nearby-MV2%
Nearby-NEGU2%
Nearby-EGU1%
Nearby-ST1%
MI-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Other-EGU6%
Percentage Contribution by State: Detroit nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
MI IL OH CN IN PA MO OK
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Detroit nonattainment area
05
10152025303540
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
17
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Houston Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
TX-NEGU23%
TX-NR21%
TX-MV15%
Other-MV6%
Nearby-NEGU5%
Other-NR5%
Nearby-NR4%
TX-ST3%
Other-EGU3%
TX-EGU3%
Nearby-ST3%
Nearby-MV2%
Other-ST2%
Nearby-EGU1%
TX-AV1%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Other-NEGU5%
Percentage Contribution by State: Houston nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
TX LA MS AR AL TN GA KY
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Houston nonattainment area
05
101520253035
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
On-RoadMobile(MV)
StationaryArea (ST)
EGU Point(EGU)
AverageFires (AV)
18
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Kent / Queen Anne MD Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
MD-MV25%
MD-NR16%
Other-MV9%
Other-NR9%
Other-EGU5%
MD-NEGU5%
Other-NEGU4%
MD-EGU4%
MD-ST4%
Nearby-MV4%
Nearby-EGU3%
Nearby-NR3%
Other-ST3%
Nearby-ST1%
MD-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Nearby-NEGU4%
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Kent & Queen Anne nonattainment area
05
10152025303540
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
Percentage Contribution by State: Kent-Queen Anne nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
MD OH VA PA WV IL IN NC
19
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Milwaukee Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
Nearby-NR21%
Nearby-MV19%
Nearby-NEGU14%
Nearby-EGU8%
Other-NR6%
Other-MV6%
Other-EGU4%
WI-MV4%
Other-NEGU4%
Nearby-ST4%
WI-EGU2%
Other-ST2%
WI-ST1%
WI-NEGU1%
WI-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
WI-NR5%
Percentage Contribution by State: Milwaukee nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
IL WI IN MO TX KS AR LA
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Milwaukee nonattainment area
05
101520253035
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
20
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: New York City Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
Local-MV23%
Local-NR15%
Nearby-MV10%
Other-MV8%
Nearby-NR8%
Other-NR8%
Nearby-NEGU4%
Other-NEGU4%
Other-EGU3%
Local-NEGU3%
Nearby-EGU3%
Nearby-ST2%
Other-ST2%
Local-EGU2% Nearby-AV
0%
Local-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Local-ST5%
Percentage Contribution by Sector:New York nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
EGU Point(EGU)
AverageFires (AV)
Percentage Contribution by State: New York City nonattainment area
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
NJ PA NY MD OH VA DE CT
21
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Philadelphia Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
Local-MV29%
Local-NR20%
Local-NEGU9%
Local-EGU7%
Other-NR7%
Other-MV7%
Other-EGU4%
Other-NEGU3%
Other-ST2%
Nearby-NEGU2%
Nearby-MV1%
Nearby-NR1%
Nearby-EGU1%
Nearby-ST1%
Local-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Local-ST5%
Percentage Contribution by State: Philadelphia nonattainment area
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PA MD NJ DE OH VA IL MI
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Philadelphia nonattainment area
05
10152025303540
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
22
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Providence Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
Other-MV22%
Other-NR17%
Nearby-MV15%
Nearby-NR15%
Other-NEGU8%
Other-EGU7%
Nearby-ST3%
Nearby-NEGU2%
Nearby-EGU2%
RI-MV1%
RI-NR1%
RI-EGU0%
RI-ST0%
RI-NEGU0%
Other-AV0%
RI-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-ST6%
Percentage Contribution by State: Providence nonattainment area
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
NY PA NJ CT MD OH VA RI
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Providence nonattainment area
05
10152025303540
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
EGU Point(EGU)
AverageFires (AV)
23
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Sheboygan Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
Nearby-NR17%
Nearby-MV16%
Nearby-NEGU13%
WI-MV9%
WI-NR8%
Nearby-EGU7%
Other-MV5%
Other-EGU5%
WI-EGU4%
Nearby-ST3%
Other-NEGU2%
WI-ST2%
WI-NEGU2%
Other-ST2% WI-AV
0%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Other-NR5%
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Sheboygan nonattainment area
05
101520253035
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
Percentage Contribution by State: Sheboygan nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
IL WI MO IN KS IA OK AR
24
2010 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Washington DC Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
Local-MV31%
Local-NR17%
Other-NR7%
Other-MV7%
Local-ST6%
Local-NEGU6%
Other-EGU4%
Other-NEGU4%
Nearby-MV3%
Nearby-EGU3%
Other-ST2%
Nearby-NEGU2%
Nearby-NR2%
Nearby-ST1%
Local-AV1%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Local-EGU5%
Percentage Contribution by State: Washington DC nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
MD VA PA OH IL IN WV NC
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Washington DC nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
25
2015 Results
• Same format/metrics as 2010
• Six nonattainment areas are projected to remain in 2015:– Philadelphia,
– New York City,
– Houston,
– Milwaukee,
– Chicago
– Baltimore
26
Percentage Contribution by State: Baltimore nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
MD VA PA OH WV IL NC IN
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Baltimore nonattainment area
05
10152025303540
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
2015 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Baltimore Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
MD-MV28%
MD-NR17%
MD-NEGU7%
Other-NR6%
MD-ST5%
Nearby-NEGU5%
Nearby-MV5%
Other-NEGU4%
Nearby-EGU4%
Nearby-NR3%
Other-EGU3%
MD-EGU3%
Other-ST2%
Nearby-ST2%
MD-AV1%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Other-MV5%
27
2015 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Chicago Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
IL-NR15%
IL-MV12%
IL-NEGU12%
Nearby-NEGU9%Other-NR
7%
IL-EGU7%
Other-MV6%
Other-NEGU5%
Other-EGU5%
Nearby-EGU4%
Nearby-MV3%
IL-ST3%
Other-ST3%
Nearby-ST2%
Other-AV0%
IL-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Nearby-NR6%
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Chicago nonattainment area
05
101520253035
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
On-RoadMobile(MV)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
Percentage Contribution by State: Chicago nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
IL IN OH MO MI PA WI
28
2015 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Houston Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
TX-NEGU28%
TX-NR22%
TX-MV10%
Nearby-NEGU6%
Other-NEGU5%
Other-NR5%
Nearby-NR4%
TX-ST3%
Nearby-ST3%
TX-EGU3%
Other-EGU2%
Other-ST2%
Nearby-MV2%
Nearby-EGU1%
TX-AV1%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Other-MV4%
Percentage Contribution by State: Houston nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
TX LA MS AR AL TN KY GA
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Houston nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
On-RoadMobile(MV)
StationaryArea (ST)
EGU Point(EGU)
AverageFires (AV)
29
2015 CAIR: Source Apportionment: MilwaukeeAverage Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
Nearby-NR21%
Nearby-NEGU19%
Nearby-MV15%
Nearby-EGU10%
Other-NR6%
WI-NR5%
Nearby-ST4%
Other-NEGU4%
Other-MV4%
WI-MV3%
Other-ST2%
WI-EGU1%
WI-NEGU1%
WI-ST1%
WI-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Other-EGU4%
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Milwaukee nonattainment area
05
101520253035
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
On-RoadMobile(MV)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
Percentage Contribution by State: Milwaukee nonattainment area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
IL IN WI MO KS AR TX OK
30
Percentage Contribution by State: New York City nonattainment area
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
NJ PA NY MD VA OH CT DE
Percentage Contribution by Sector:New York City nonattainment area
05
10152025303540
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
EGU Point(EGU)
AverageFires (AV)
2015 CAIR: Source Apportionment: New York City Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
Local-MV22%
Local-NR16%
Nearby-MV8%
Nearby-NR8%
Other-NR7%
Other-MV6%
Nearby-NEGU5%
Other-NEGU5%
Local-NEGU4%
Other-EGU3%
Nearby-EGU3%
Nearby-ST3%
Other-ST2%
Local-EGU2%
Other-AV0%
Local-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Local-ST6%
31
2015 CAIR: Source Apportionment: Philadelphia Average Contribution by State/Sector to Exceedance-level Ozone
Local-MV26%
Local-NR21%
Local-NEGU12%
Other-NR7%
Local-ST7%
Local-EGU6%
Other-EGU4%
Other-NEGU4%
Other-ST2%
Nearby-NEGU2%
Nearby-EGU1%
Nearby-NR1%
Nearby-MV1%
Nearby-ST1%
Local-AV0%
Nearby-AV0%
Other-AV0%
Other-MV5%
Percentage Contribution by Sector:Philadelphia nonattainment area
05
101520253035
On-RoadMobile(MV)
Non-RoadMobile (NR)
Non-EGUPoint
(NEGU)
EGU Point(EGU)
StationaryArea (ST)
AverageFires (AV)
Percentage Contribution by State: Philadelphia nonattainment area
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
PA MD NJ DE OH VA MI WV
32
CAIR 2010/2015 Ozone Source Apportionment
• Definition of local areas (i.e., multi-state nonattainment areas)– New York City: NY, NJ, CT
– Philadelphia: PA, DE, MD, NJ
– Washington DC: MD, VA
• Definition of “nearby” areas– Atlanta: AL, FL, NC, SC, TN Houston: AR, LA– Baltimore: DE, PA, VA, WV Kent/Queen Anne: DE, PA, VA, WV– Beaumont: AR, LA, OK Milwaukee: IA, IL, IN, MI– Buffalo: PA New York City: DE, MA, PA– Chicago: IA, IN*, MI Philadelphia: VA, WV– Cleveland: IN, MI, PA, WV Providence: CT, MA, NY– Dallas: AR, LA, OK Sheboygan: IA, IN, IL, MI– Detroit: IN, OH Washington DC: DE, PA, WV
• Questions? Contact Pat Dolwick: [email protected]