1 roger d. launius national air and space museum smithsonian institution washington, d.c. june 26,...

10
Human Spaceflight and American History 1 Roger D. Launius National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. June 26, 2012

Upload: timothy-payne

Post on 11-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Roger D. Launius National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. June 26, 2012

1

Human Spaceflight and American History

Roger D. LauniusNational Air and Space MuseumSmithsonian InstitutionWashington, D.C.

June 26, 2012

Page 2: 1 Roger D. Launius National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. June 26, 2012

2

Human Spaceflight’s Dominant Frames

Cold War Competition U.S./USSR national security Dominant in period between 1950s

and 1980s Combat by non-lethal means Pride and prestige powerful drivers

Cultural Conceptions Historical perceptions of exploration National narratives (frontier,

progress, exceptionalism, etc.) Economics and Commerce

Dominated by movement of electrons (comsats, remote sensing, etc.)

Ground-based components central to commercial viability (GPS and ground-based uses worth billions)

Page 3: 1 Roger D. Launius National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. June 26, 2012

Public Support for Apollo

Click icon to add pictureAmericans did not send astronauts to the Moon with Project Apollo between 1969 and 1972 because everyone supported it.

3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Jun-61

Feb-65

Oct-65

Jul-67 Apr-70

Jul-79 Jul-94 Jul-95 Jun-99

Jul-03 Dec-03

Jan-04

Jul-04

Perc

enta

ge o

f the

Am

eric

an P

ublic

(%)

SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT FUND HUMAN TRIPS TO THE MOON?

Favor Oppose

Page 4: 1 Roger D. Launius National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. June 26, 2012

4

The Culmination of Apollo

$25.4 billion cost. Apollo 11 landing, July

20, 1969. Six successful

landings altogether. Three circumlunar

flights (Apollos 8, 10, 13).

Technological advance was pathbreaking.

Scientific return was astounding.

Page 5: 1 Roger D. Launius National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. June 26, 2012

5

Apollo 17 PanoramaThis image of Harrison Schmitt makes clear one reason Apollo was never followed with additional Moon landing programs. Humanity found nothing there of value that they wished to exploit, as had happen repeatedly in previous terrestrial explorations.

5

Page 6: 1 Roger D. Launius National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. June 26, 2012

6

NASA Budget over Time

Page 7: 1 Roger D. Launius National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. June 26, 2012

7

Some Good News

While Americans may not know that much about NASA’s efforts in space, they generally have a positive opinion of it. Over 70 percent say they have a favorable impression, compared to less than 20% who hold an unfavorable impression. Polls conducted by Yankelovich.

0102030405060708090

I APPROVE OF AMERICA'S CURRENT CIVILIAN SPACE PROGRAM

Page 8: 1 Roger D. Launius National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. June 26, 2012

8

Making the Moon a Second Home

Space Task Group Report, 1969. Post-Apollo program that included:

▪ Space Shuttle.▪ Space Station.▪ Moon base. ▪ Human expedition to Mars.

Nixon approved only Space Shuttle, January 1972. Space Exploration Initiative, July 1989.

Moon base. Human expedition to Mars. Ended by 1991 because of $400B price tag.

Vision for Space Exploration, January 2004.

Page 9: 1 Roger D. Launius National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. June 26, 2012

9

A Mission to Mars?

The challenge of human missions beyond the Moon.

Do you want t o see humans on Mars

SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT FUND HUMAN TRIPS TO MARS?

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Jul-69 Jul-89 May-91 Jun-94 Aug-94 Jul-97 Jul-99 Aug-99 Jan-04

Favor Oppose

Page 10: 1 Roger D. Launius National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. June 26, 2012

Reconsidering Spaceflight Rationales

Currently, no firm strategic imperative for human space exploration and development

As primary rationales, human destiny, national prestige, technology spin-offs, science, and inspiration of youth appear insufficient

Expansive views of economic development and survival might become primary rationales of future

10