1 snap and span barry smith and pierre grenon university at buffalo and institute for formal...

84
1 SNAP and SPAN Barry Smith and Pierre Grenon University at Buffalo and Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science (ifomis.de ) University of Leipzig

Post on 22-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

SNAP and SPANBarry Smith and Pierre Grenon

University at Buffaloand

Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science (ifomis.de)

University of Leipzig

2

Formal Ontology

= domain-neutral

Examples of categories:

Substance, Process, Agent, Property, Relation, Location, Spatial Region

Part-of, Boundary-of

3

Material Ontology

= regional or domain-specific ontology, e.g. GeO

Examples of categories:

River, Mountain, Country, Desert …

Resides-In, Is-to-the-West-of

4

Realist Perspectivalism

There is a multiplicity of ontological perspectives on reality, all equally veridical and transparent to reality

vs. Reductionism: “Only my preferred perspective on reality is veridical”

5

Realist Perspectivalism

Perspectivalism: all views are ontologically admissible.

Realist Perspectivalism: only those perspectives are admissible that are transparent to reality

6

Need for different perspectives

Double counting:

3 apples on the table7 x 1016 molecules at spatial locations L1, L2 and L3

Not one ontology, but a multiplicity of complementary ontologies

Cf. Quantum mechanics: particle vs. wave ontologies

7

Cardinal Perspectives

Formal vs. Material

Micro- vs. Meso- vs. Macro

SNAP vs. SPAN

8

A Network of Domain Ontologies

BFO

BFO = Basic Formal Ontology

9

A Network of Domain Ontologies

MedO

BFO

10

A Network of Domain Ontologies

GeO

MedO

BFO

11

A Network of Domain Ontologies

LexO

GeO

MedO

BFO

12

A Network of Domain Ontologies

MilO LexO

GeO

MedO

BFO

13

A Network of Domain Ontologies

EcO

MilO LexO

GeO

MedO

BFO

14

Cardinal Perspectives

Formal vs. Material Ontologies

Granularity (Micro vs. Meso vs. Macro)

SNAP vs. SPAN

15

Granular Partitions

16

 

Ontological Zooming

17

Ontological Zooming

folk geography

land survey

18

Ontological Zooming

both are transparent partitions of one and the same reality

19

Cardinal Perspectives

Formal vs. Material Ontologies

Granularity (Micro vs. Meso vs. Macro)

Time: SNAP vs. SPAN

20

Substances and processes exist in time in different

ways

substance

t i m

e

process

21

Snapshot vs. video

substance

t i m

e

process

22

Endurants and perdurants

Substances and processesContinuants and occurrents

In preparing an inventory of realitywe keep track of these two different categories of entities in two different ways (stocks vs. flows)

23

Endurants vs. perdurants

Endurants- have continuous existence in time- preserve their identity through change- exist in toto if they exist at all

Perdurants- have temporal parts- unfold themselves through time- exist only in their phases/stages

24

Endurants vs. perdurants

Substances vs. their lives

25

You are a substance

Your life is a process

You are 3-dimensionalYour life is 4-dimensional

26

Substances do not have temporal parts

The first 5-minute phase of my existence is not a temporal part of me It is a temporal part of that complex process which is my life

28

SNAP vs. SPAN

1. SNAP: a SNAPshot ontology of endurants existing at a time

2. SPAN: a four-dimensionalist ontology of processes

29

Three kinds of SNAP entities

1. Substances2. SPQR… entities3. Spatial regions,

Contexts, Niches

30

SPQR… entities

States, powers, qualities, roles …

31

Other SPQR… entities:

functions, dispositions, plans, shapes

SPQR… entities are all dependent on substances

relations

32

Examples of simple SNAP ontologies 1

space

33

Examples of simple SNAP ontologies 2

35

each SNAP section through reality

includes everything which existsat the corresponding now

36

Many SNAP Ontologies

t1

t3

t2

here time exists outside the ontology, as an index or time-stamp

37

The SPAN Ontology

t i m e

38

here time exists as part of the domain of the ontology

The SPAN ontology

39t i m e

campaign

The SPAN ontology

40

They are windows on just that portion of reality which is visible through the given ontology (… Pat Hayes …)

SNAP and SPAN ontologies are partial only

(Realist perspectivalism)

41

SNAP: Entities existing in toto at a time

42

Three kinds of SNAP entities

1. Substances2. SPQR… entities3. Spatial regions,

Contexts, Niches

43

44

45

SNAP

46

SPAN: Entities extended in time

SPANEntity extended in time

Portion of Spacetime

Fiat part of process *First phase of a clinical trial

Spacetime worm of 3 + Tdimensions

occupied by life of organism

Temporal interval *projection of organism’s life

onto temporal dimension

Aggregate of processes *Clinical trial

Process[±Relational]

Circulation of blood,secretion of hormones,course of disease, life

Processual Entity[Exists in space and time, unfolds

in time phase by phase]

Temporal boundary ofprocess *

onset of disease, death

47

SPAN: Entities extended in time

48

SPAN: Entities extended in time

49

Rule: Respect Granularity

spatial region qualitysubstance

parts of spatial regions are always spatial regions

50

Respect Granularity

spatial region qualitysubstance

parts of substances are always substances

51

Respect Granularity

spatial region qualitysubstance

parts of qualities are always qualities

52

Respect Granularity

process

parts of processes are always processes

53

Relations crossing the SNAP/SPAN border are not

part-relations

John’s lifesubstance John

physiological processes

sustaining in existence

54

Parts of processes (1)

c

c: boundary

a

a

a: scattered part

b

b: temporal slice

55

Parts of processes (2)

a

a: sub-process

b

b: phase

56

Relations between SNAP and SPAN

SNAP-entities participate in processes; they have lives, histories.

57

SPQR… entities and their SPAN realizations

the expression of a functionthe exercise of a rolethe execution of a planthe realization of a dispositionthe application of a therapy

58

SPQR… entities and their SPAN realizations

functionroleplandispositiontherapy

SNAP

59

SPQR… entities and their SPAN realizations

expression exercise execution realization application

SPAN

60

Temporal Co-Incidence

x

y

SNAP-t

At time t, colony of bacteria in the throat.

time

SPANMigration of a colony of bacteriafrom the mouth to the small intestine.

B

61

Participation

x

y

substances x, y participate in process B

time

Bx

y

SNAP-ti.

time

SPAN

B

62

Projections

proce

ss

material region spatial region

participants

spatio

-tempora

l region

SNAPti

SPAN

63

SNAP-SPAN relations (3)

Ontological dependence.

Some forms of participation:

-initiation, termination

-creation, destruction

-sustenance, degradation

64

Ontology for Geographical

Information Science

65

GeO

66

An adequate ontology of geography has to have those three components:

1. SNAP

2. FIELD

3. SPAN

67

SNAP GeO

68

An adequate ontology of geography has to have those three basic categories:

1. Geographical Objects

2. Geographical Attributes

3. Places, Niches, Environments

69

FIELD GeO

70

An adequate ontology of geography has to have those three categories:

1. Fields

2. Fields Attributes

3. Spatial Regions

71

SPAN GeO

72

An adequate ontology of geography has to have those two categories:

1. Processual Entities

2. Space-Time Worms

73

Relations in GeO

Of course, all the Basic Formal Relations obtain here.

There are GeO specific relations or GeO specifics forms of Basic Formal Relations.

74

Relations in GeO

Forms of geo-spatial location-orientation (east of, etc.)-field elements-geographical location (projection on Earth's surface, 2-D)-geo-spatial location (with

considerations of altitude, 3-D)

Relations defined based on participation in specific geographical processes.

75

Geo Location

ground, 2d-location

underground, 3d-location

above ground, 3-d location

76

Relations between SNAP and SPAN (and FIELD) in

GeO

77

Geographical Changes

Some types of processes:

-Movements (location change)

-Substantial Change

-Property Change

78

Movement

from location

x

ends

begins

mov

emen

t

to location

y

79

begins

mov

emen

t

from location

x

to location

y

ends

Moving Outside

80

Initiation

Destruction

81

Creation

a process P

t1

a region of space R where P is ongoing

R

Snap-t1

82

Creation

P

t1

R

Snap-t1

t2>t1

R

Snap-t2

P initiates a,a's birth at t2 a's life (overlaps P)

83

Property change

84

Scenario