1 the european patent granting procedure domenico golzio european patent office [email protected]...
TRANSCRIPT
1
The European Patent Granting Procedure
Domenico GolzioEuropean Patent Office
Cyberlaw TorinoTecnologie digitali e diritto nell’era della Rete
12 - 13 Luglio 2004Fondazione Giovanni Agnelli - Torino
2
Domenico GolzioItalian
Degree in Physics
11 years Telecom, Car, Aerospace Industry 25 Technical Papers 3 Patents
1990 European Patent Office – Munich1997 European Patent Office – The Hague Patent Examiner: Search - Examination - Opposition
2002 Co-ordinator International Co-operation
3
The Inventing Process
I have an idea!!!
How can I protect it?
4
Intellectual property Rights (IPRs)
Patent
Registered Design
Trade Mark
Copyright
5
What is a Patent? A contract between an inventor and a state
Inventor
1. Protection for about 20 years2. Exclusive rights to produce, use,
sell and import the invention
• to recoup investment in R&D• to strengthen market position and
competitiveness
State
1. Publication of the invention
• to spread new technical knowledge• to avoid R&D duplication• to foster innovation
Patents are granted to inventions which are Novel, Inventive (non obvious), suitable for Industrial Application when considered against the Prior Art
6
Patent Rights
• Exclusive right: nobody can produce, use, sell or import your invention (patent infringement)
• Territorial right: a patent in one state does not affect patent in other states
• Timed right: protection from a certain date to another date
• Transferable right: you can assign or sell (license) your own patent/patent application to others
• One-Time right: when a patented product is put on the market the patent right is exhausted
• Passive right: prevents others to exploit your invention, does not guarantee that you will exploit it
7
Patent Protection
A) National Patent Application
B) International Patent Application PCT
C) European Patent Application
8
Patent Protection National Patent Application
one application for one state
one procedure for each state
one patent for one state
9
Patent Protection International Patent Application PCT
one application for up to 115 PCT member States
International Search Report and International Preliminary Examination Report
EPC states can be collectively designated as a region
10
Patent Protection European Patent Application
one application filed at one Office for “N” contracting states
one procedure for all “N” states
one EP patent for all “N” states
Cost –Effective (costs less than 3 national patents)
11
Austria
Belgium
Switzerland
CyprusGermany
Denmark
Spain
FinlandFrance
United Kingdom
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Monaco
Netherlands
Portugal
Sweden
TurkeyBulgariaBulgaria
Czech RepublicCzech Republic
EstoniaEstonia
SlovakiaSlovakia
European Patent Convention
28 Member States
European Patent Convention
28 Member States
RomaniaRomania
SloveniaSlovenia
HungaryHungary
PolandPoland
12
The Actors of the PatentGranting Procedure
Inventor/Applicant Representative European Patent Office (EPO)
publishes
Unexamined Patent Applications (A)
Contract Proposal
Granted Patents (B)Final Contract
13
European Patent Convention ‘EPC’
Articles
Rules
CaseCase LawLaw
* Guidelines
* Internal Instructions
Search
Examination
*
14 *
... support innovation, competitiveness and economic growth for the benefit of the citizens of Europe.
... set patent protection standards which responds to the needs of the system’s users
15
The European Patent Granting Procedure
FilingFilingFilingFiling SearchSearchSearchSearch OppositionOppositionOppositionOppositionPublicationPublicationPublicationPublication ExaminationExaminationExaminationExamination GrantGrantGrantGrant
16
Representative
• Professional representative Art 134 EPC• National of a Contracting State • With his place of business in a Contracting State
Who has passed the European Qualifying examination
17
Where can the inventor file?Art 75(1) EPC
• EPO Munich• EPO The Hague• EPO Berlin Sub-Office• Patent Office of Contracting State
– If national law permits• All Contracting States except NL
18
What languages can he file in?
• Art 14(1)EPC: EPO official languages
•Art 14(2) EPC: non-EPO language•language of Contracting State•His own language•Language of his state of residence•With translation within 3 months of filing date
19
Contents of a European Patent Application
Art 78(1) EPC
• Request for grant
• Description of the invention– Disclosure of prior art– Detailed description
• Claims
• Drawings
• Abstract
20
Receiving Section
• Receives application and carries out first treatment of file
• Examination on filing Art 90 EPC
• Examination as to formal requirements Art 91 EPC
• Treatment of subsequently filed documents
21
The European Patent Granting Procedure
FilingFilingFilingFiling SearchSearchSearchSearch OppositionOppositionOppositionOppositionPublicationPublicationPublicationPublication ExaminationExaminationExaminationExamination GrantGrantGrantGrant
22
What is the aim of the Search?
• To find the most relevant State of the Art
• The State of the Art is all information, relevant to the patentability, made available to the public (in writing or orally) prior to the date of filing of the patent application Art 54(2) EPC
23
Where do we search?
• The EPO Database EPODOC which contains over 30 million prior art patent documents
• Other databases (WPI, PAJ, INSPEC etc.) and the Internet may also need to be consulted
24
SEARCH: is it Hopeless?
I have read 2 Million documents andI still haven‘t found anything relevant!
ENORMOUSTASK!!!
HELP!HELP!
25
Documentation to the rescue!
• Every prior art document in the EPODOC database is classified according to its content
• Based on its class a patent or non-patent document is physically stored in a corresponding classification unit
26
SEARCH: it is possible!
• Only documents in relevant classification units need to be searched
Thank Heavens I only need to search few classes!
I‘ve got it!
27
How are the classification units organized?
• In the past, paper documents were stored in special cabinets according to their classification
• But with 130000 defined classes.....
28
Organization of classified documents
• Electronic storage of documents is essential
• In the year 2003 EPO documentation consisted of:– 32,1 million published patent
documents– 4,6 million technical articles– Access to 50 million abstracts of
articles
Accessible for free via esp@cenet !!!
29
Who carries out the search?
• Examiners
– Carry out the search Art 92 EPC
– Classify the documents
30
Search ReportArt 92 EPC - Rule 44 EPC
A search report is drafted listing the state of the art documents:
1. Publication Data (applicant, publication date)
2. A letter code (X,Y,A) which identifies the degree of relevance
3. An indication of the most relevant parts of the documents
4. International Classification (IPC) of the application
31
Search Report
• No communication between Search Division and Applicant
• Applicant cannot amend content of description, claims or drawings before the Search Report R.86(1) EPC
• Search Report is sent to applicant with copies of cited documents Art. 92(2) EPC
32
The European Patent Granting Procedure
FilingFilingFilingFiling SearchSearchSearchSearch OppositionOppositionOppositionOppositionPublicationPublicationPublicationPublication ExaminationExaminationExaminationExamination GrantGrantGrantGrant
33
Publicationof a Patent Application
• All European Patent applications are published as soon as possible after the expiry of a period of 18 months after priority Art. 93(1) EPC
• Applicant can request early publication Art. 93(1) EPC
• Publication in language of Proceedings Art. 14(6) EPC
34
Publication Contents Art. 93(2) EPC
• Front page with:• Bibliographical data of Application• Publication Date• IPC Classification• Designated States• Title R.33(1) EPC• Abstract R.33, R.47 EPC• Main Drawing(s) R.33(4)EPC
• Description• Claims• Drawings• Search Report if available Art. 93(2) EPC
35
Publication Types
• A1 Publication – Front Page + Application + Search Report
• A2 Publication– Front Page + Application (No Search Report)
• A3 Publication (only after A2)– Front Page + Search Report
36
Publication of Patent Application-vs-
Granted Patent
• Publication of the Patent Application is not the final Patent
• The granted Patent is published after the Examination and Grant Procedure (publication type B1)
37
Publication of Application Legal implications
• Application contents become part of the state of the art Art 54(2) EPC
• Provisional Protection Art 67, Art 69 EPC• Third Party Observations Art 115 EPC• Application data entered in public EP
Register Art 127 EPC• Application file open for public inspection
Art 128(4) EPC free file inspection via epoline !!!
38
Publication of Search Report Legal implications
• Triggers 6-month time limit for payment of designation fees Art 79(2) EPC
• Triggers 6-month time limit for filing the Request for Examination Art 94(2) EPC
39
The European Patent Granting Procedure
FilingFilingFilingFiling SearchSearchSearchSearch OppositionOppositionOppositionOppositionPublicationPublicationPublicationPublication ExaminationExaminationExaminationExamination GrantGrantGrantGrant
40
Overview
• The examination division
• The claims
• Patentability
• Refusal or Grant
41
Examining DivisionArt 18 EPC
• Examining Division consists of three examiners:
- 1st Member, 2nd Member and Chairman
- 1st Member corresponds with the Applicant
- Examining Division decide together whether to grant or refuse the application
42
Substantive Examination Procedure
Art 96(2) EPC
Request for examination
Examining Division Appointed
1st Examiner Applicant
Examining Division
Intention to grant
B
Decision to refuse
B
43
The ClaimsArt 69 EPC
• They define the scope or extent of the protection of the patent– But the description and drawings are used to
interpret claims
• They are the most important part of the application for the Examining Division
44
Introduction to Patentability
• What are the main requirements for granting a patent application?
– Novelty Art 54 EPC– Inventive Step Art 56 EPC– Industrial Applicability Art 57 EPC
• Problem Solution Aproach used to assess Inventive step
45
The Grant Art 97(2) EPC
At least two members of the Examining Division agree that the application meets the requirements of the European Patent Convention
46
Refusal Art. 97(1) EPC
• If the Examining Division is considering refusing the application
• The Applicant has the right to be heard• He can ask to present his arguments face to
face in Oral Proceedings Art 116 EPC before the division
• If at least two members of the Examining Division are still not convinced the application is refused
47
The European Patent Granting Procedure
FilingFilingFilingFiling SearchSearchSearchSearch OppositionOppositionOppositionOppositionPublicationPublicationPublicationPublication ExaminationExaminationExaminationExamination GrantGrantGrantGrant
48
Grant Rule 51(4) EPC
• Approval of the final text
• Fees for grant and printing
• File translation of claims in the other two official languages
49
Entry into the “National” Phase
Filing of translation of the patent specification Appointment of a representative
Payment of “special” fee
Payment of “national” renewal fees
Registering a transfer, licenses and other rights
50
The European Patent Granting Procedure
FiFillingingFiFillinging SearchSearchSearchSearch OppositionOppositionOppositionOppositionPublicationPublicationPublicationPublication ExaminationExaminationExaminationExamination GrantGrantGrantGrant
51
A Brief Introduction to Opposition
• Overview
– What is it?– Opposition Division– Revocation or Maintenance– Advantages
52
Definitions
• Opposition is a centralized EPO procedure for challenging the validity of a granted European Patent
• Art. 99 EPC– It must be filed within 9 months of the
mention of grant being published– It can be filed by any person
53
Why do we need opposition?
• It allows the introduction of disclosures which may not have been available to the Examining Division– Oral disclosures– Prior use– Proprietary disclosures e.g. manuals
• It also allows the public to challenge the Examining Division’s assessment of patentability
(e.g. Greenpeace opposition to the ‘Edinburgh Patent’ in 2000)
54
How does it work?
Oppositions proceedings are adversarial:
- the patent proprietor and the opponent battle it out amongst themselves
- the Opposition Division arbitrates and takes the final decision
55
Opposition
OpponentOpponentOpponentOpponent ProprietorProprietorProprietorProprietor
56
Opposition Division
• 3 members
• At least 2 of whom did not take part in the Examination Proceedings
– Usually first examiner from Examining Division plus two others
57
The Opposition Procedure Art 101(2) EPC
OppositionOpposition
DivisionDivisionOppositionOpposition
DivisionDivision
OpponentOpponentOpponentOpponent ProprietorProprietorProprietorProprietorCounter- Counter-
arguments arguments
and/or and/or
amendmentsamendments
Counter- Counter-
arguments arguments
and/or and/or
amendmentsamendments
OppositionOppositionOppositionOpposition
DecisionDecisionDecisionDecision
Counter-Counter-
arguments arguments
and/or and/or
amendmentsamendments
Counter-Counter-
arguments arguments
and/or and/or
amendmentsamendments
OppositionOppositionOppositionOpposition
58
Possible Decisions
1. Revoke the patent in its entirety: Patent no longer exists
2. Maintain the patent in amended form: Claims are restricted
3. Maintain the patent in unamended form: Claims maintained as granted
59
Advantages of Opposition
• Patent is revoked for all designated states
• Cheap compared to proceedings before national courts (613 Euros)
• Possibility of appeal• Use of a ‘straw man’ is allowed• 2000 oppositions filed in year 2000
– only 5.7% of granted patents opposed
60
Opposition Summary
• Centralized procedure for challenging a granted EP patent
• Allows introduction of disclosures not available to examining division
• Much cheaper than national revocation proceedings
• Revocation for all designated states
61
Appeal
FilingFilingFilingFiling SearchSearchSearchSearch OppositionOppositionOppositionOppositionPublicationPublicationPublicationPublication ExaminationExaminationExaminationExamination GrantGrantGrantGrant
Boards of AppealBoards of AppealBoards of AppealBoards of Appeal
62
Boards of Appeal
• Legal Board– Appeals relating to legal matters e.g. refund of fees
• Technical Board– Technical matters in examination e.g. refusal for lack
of novelty
63
Appeal Procedure Art. 106-111EPC
• From decisions of – Receiving section– Examining division– Opposition division
• Any party adversely affected• Examination of Appeal
– Suspensive effect
• Decision
64
Decisions in Respect of Appeal
• First instance decision upheld
• First instance decision rectified– Possible remittal to first instance with
instructions
65
Enlarged Board of AppealArt 112 EPC
• Important legal questions from Boards of Appeal– During appeal proceedings
• Points of law referred by President– Conflicting decisions given by different Boards of
Appeal
• Not a further instance
66
Costs for an EP (average) (01.06.2001)( 8 states; duration of 10 years)
Costs for an EP (average) (01.06.2001)( 8 states; duration of 10 years)
EPO EUR 4.300
Filing EUR 800S&E EUR 2.400Grant EUR 1.100
% of total 13 %
EPO EUR 4.300
Filing EUR 800S&E EUR 2.400Grant EUR 1.100
% of total 13 %
Professional Representation EUR 6.100
% of total 20 %
Professional Representation EUR 6.100
% of total 20 %
Translations in contracting states
EUR 11.800% of total 38 %
Translations in contracting states
EUR 11.800% of total 38 %
Yearly Taxes EUR 8.500
% of total 29 %
Yearly Taxes EUR 8.500
% of total 29 %
Total Costs
EUR 31.100
Total Costs
EUR 31.100
67
Thank you!!
If you have further question, please consult www.epo.org
or write to [email protected]