1 © the mcgraw-hill companies, inc., 2004 technical note 7 process capability and statistical...

39
1 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Technical Note 7 Process Capability and Statistical Quality Control

Post on 19-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Technical Note 7

Process Capability and

Statistical Quality Control

2

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

• What is quality?

• Process Variation

• Process Capability

• Process Control Procedures— Variable data— Attribute data

• Acceptance Sampling— Operating Characteristic Curve— Standard table of sampling plans

OBJECTIVES

3

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

• Quality defined— Durability, reliability, long warrantee— Fitness for use, degree of conformance— Maintainability

• Measures of quality— Grade—measurable characteristics, finish— Consistency—good or bad, predictability— Conformance—degree product meets

specifications Consistency versus conformance

What Is Quality?

4

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Basic Forms of Variation

Assignable variation (special) is caused by factors that can be clearly identified and possibly managed

Common variation (chance or random) is inherent in the production process

Example: A poorly trained employee that creates variation in finished product output.

Example: A poorly trained employee that creates variation in finished product output.

Example: A molding process that always leaves “burrs” or flaws on a molded item.

Example: A molding process that always leaves “burrs” or flaws on a molded item.

5

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Taguchi’s View of Variation

IncrementalCost of Variability

High

Zero

LowerSpec

TargetSpec

UpperSpec

Traditional View

IncrementalCost of Variability

High

Zero

LowerSpec

TargetSpec

UpperSpec

Taguchi’s View

Exhibits TN7.1 & TN7.2

Exhibits TN7.1 & TN7.2

Traditional view is that quality within the LS and US is good and that the cost of quality outside this range is constant, where Taguchi views costs as increasing as variability increases, so seek to achieve zero defects and that will truly minimize quality costs.

Traditional view is that quality within the LS and US is good and that the cost of quality outside this range is constant, where Taguchi views costs as increasing as variability increases, so seek to achieve zero defects and that will truly minimize quality costs.

6

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Process Capability

• Process (control) limits— Calculated from data gathered from the process— It is natural tolerance limits— Defined by +/- 3 standard deviation— Used to determine if process is in statistical control

• Tolerance limits— Often determined externally, e.g., by customer— Process may be in control but not within

specification

• How do the limits relate to one another?

7

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Process Capability

• Case 1: Cp > 1— USL-LSL > 6 sigma— Situation desired— Defacto standard is 1.33+

6

LSLUSLCp

6

LNTL UNTL

LSL USL

8

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Process Capability

• Case 1: Cp = 1— USL-LSL = 6 sigma— Approximately 0.27% defectives will be made— Process is unstable

6

LSLUSLC p

6

LNTL UNTL

LSL USL

9

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Process Capability

• Case 1: Cp < 1— USL-LSL < 6 sigma— Situation undesirable— Process is yield sensitive— Could produce large number of defectives

6

LSLUSLCp

6

LNTL UNTL

LSL USL

10

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Process Capability Index,

• Most widely used capability measure

• Measures design versus specification relative to the nominal value

• Based on worst case situation

• Defacto value is 1 and processes with this score is capable

• Scores > 1 indicates 6-sigma subsumed by the inspection limits

• Scores less than 1 will result in an incapable process

pkC

11

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Process Capability Index, Cpk

3

X-UTLor

3

LTLXmin=C pk

Shifts in Process Mean

Capability Index shows how well parts being produced fit into design limit specifications.

Capability Index shows how well parts being produced fit into design limit specifications.

As a production process produces items small shifts in equipment or systems can cause differences in production performance from differing samples.

As a production process produces items small shifts in equipment or systems can cause differences in production performance from differing samples.

12

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Types of Statistical Sampling

• Attribute (Go or no-go information)— Defectives refers to the acceptability of product

across a range of characteristics.— Defects refers to the number of defects per unit

which may be higher than the number of defectives.

— p-chart application

• Variable (Continuous)— Usually measured by the mean and the

standard deviation.— X-bar and R chart applications

13

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

UCL

LCL

Samples over time

1 2 3 4 5 6

UCL

LCL

Samples over time

1 2 3 4 5 6

UCL

LCL

Samples over time

1 2 3 4 5 6

Normal BehaviorNormal Behavior

Possible problem, investigatePossible problem, investigate

Possible problem, investigatePossible problem, investigate

Statistical Process Control (SPC) Charts

14

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Control Limits are based on the Normal Curve

x

0 1 2 3-3 -2 -1z

mean

Standard deviation units or “z” units.

Standard deviation units or “z” units.

15

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Control Limits

We establish the Upper Control Limits (UCL) and the Lower Control Limits (LCL) with plus or minus 3 standard deviations from some x-bar or mean value. Based on this we can expect 99.7% of our sample observations to fall within these limits.

xLCL UCL

99.7%

16

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Example of Constructing a p-Chart: Required Data

1 100 42 100 23 100 54 100 35 100 66 100 47 100 38 100 79 100 1

10 100 211 100 312 100 213 100 214 100 815 100 3

Sample No. m

No. in eachSample, n

No. of defects found in each sample, D

17

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Statistical Process Control Formulas:Attribute Measurements (p-Chart)

p =Total Number of Defectives

Total Number of Observationsp =

Total Number of Defectives

Total Number of Observations

ns

)p-(1 p = p n

s)p-(1 p

= p

p

p

z - p = LCL

z + p = UCL

s

s

p

p

z - p = LCL

z + p = UCL

s

s

Given:

Compute control limits:

18

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

1. Calculate the sample proportions, p (these are what can be plotted on the p-chart) for each sample

1. Calculate the sample proportions, p (these are what can be plotted on the p-chart) for each sample

Sample n Defectives p1 100 4 0.042 100 2 0.023 100 5 0.054 100 3 0.035 100 6 0.066 100 4 0.047 100 3 0.038 100 7 0.079 100 1 0.01

10 100 2 0.0211 100 3 0.0312 100 2 0.0213 100 2 0.0214 100 8 0.0815 100 3 0.03

Example of Constructing a p-chart: Step 1

i

ii nDp

19

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

2. Calculate the average of the sample proportions2. Calculate the average of the sample proportions

0.036=1500

55 = p 0.036=1500

55 = p

3. Calculate the standard deviation of the sample proportion

3. Calculate the standard deviation of the sample proportion

.0188= 100

.036)-.036(1=

)p-(1 p = p n

s .0188= 100

.036)-.036(1=

)p-(1 p = p n

s

Example of Constructing a p-chart: Steps 2&3

mp

nD

p i

i

i

20

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

4. Calculate the control limits4. Calculate the control limits

3(.0188) .036 3(.0188) .036

UCL = 0.0924LCL = -0.0204 (or 0)

UCL = 0.0924LCL = -0.0204 (or 0)

p

p

z - p = LCL

z + p = UCL

s

s

p

p

z - p = LCL

z + p = UCL

s

s

Example of Constructing a p-chart: Step 4

21

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Example of Constructing a p-Chart: Step 5

5. Plot the individual sample proportions, the average of the proportions, and the control limits

5. Plot the individual sample proportions, the average of the proportions, and the control limits

Example of Constructing a p -Chart

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Observation

p

p

UCL

LCL

22

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Example of x-bar and R Charts: Required Data

Sample Obs 1 Obs 2 Obs 3 Obs 4 Obs 51 10.682 10.689 10.776 10.798 10.7142 10.787 10.86 10.601 10.746 10.7793 10.78 10.667 10.838 10.785 10.7234 10.591 10.727 10.812 10.775 10.735 10.693 10.708 10.79 10.758 10.6716 10.749 10.714 10.738 10.719 10.6067 10.791 10.713 10.689 10.877 10.6038 10.744 10.779 10.11 10.737 10.759 10.769 10.773 10.641 10.644 10.72510 10.718 10.671 10.708 10.85 10.71211 10.787 10.821 10.764 10.658 10.70812 10.622 10.802 10.818 10.872 10.72713 10.657 10.822 10.893 10.544 10.7514 10.806 10.749 10.859 10.801 10.70115 10.66 10.681 10.644 10.747 10.728

23

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Example of x-bar and R charts: Step 1. Calculate sample means, sample ranges, mean of means, and mean of ranges.

Sample Obs 1 Obs 2 Obs 3 Obs 4 Obs 5 Avg Range1 10.682 10.689 10.776 10.798 10.714 10.732 0.1162 10.787 10.86 10.601 10.746 10.779 10.755 0.2593 10.78 10.667 10.838 10.785 10.723 10.759 0.1714 10.591 10.727 10.812 10.775 10.73 10.727 0.2215 10.693 10.708 10.79 10.758 10.671 10.724 0.1196 10.749 10.714 10.738 10.719 10.606 10.705 0.1437 10.791 10.713 10.689 10.877 10.603 10.735 0.2748 10.744 10.779 10.11 10.737 10.75 10.624 0.6699 10.769 10.773 10.641 10.644 10.725 10.710 0.132

10 10.718 10.671 10.708 10.85 10.712 10.732 0.17911 10.787 10.821 10.764 10.658 10.708 10.748 0.16312 10.622 10.802 10.818 10.872 10.727 10.768 0.25013 10.657 10.822 10.893 10.544 10.75 10.733 0.34914 10.806 10.749 10.859 10.801 10.701 10.783 0.15815 10.66 10.681 10.644 10.747 10.728 10.692 0.103

Averages 10.728 0.220400

mx

x mR

R = 160.926 = 3.306

24

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Example of x-bar and R charts: Step 2. Determine Control Limit Formulas and

Necessary Tabled Values

x Chart Control Limits

UCL = x + A R

LCL = x - A R

2

2

x Chart Control Limits

UCL = x + A R

LCL = x - A R

2

2

R Chart Control Limits

UCL = D R

LCL = D R

4

3

R Chart Control Limits

UCL = D R

LCL = D R

4

3

From Exhibit TN7.7From Exhibit TN7.7

n A2 D3 D42 1.88 0 3.273 1.02 0 2.574 0.73 0 2.285 0.58 0 2.116 0.48 0 2.007 0.42 0.08 1.928 0.37 0.14 1.869 0.34 0.18 1.82

10 0.31 0.22 1.7811 0.29 0.26 1.74

25

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Example of x-bar and R charts: Steps 3&4. Calculate x-bar Chart and Plot Values

10.601

10.856

=).58(0.2204-10.728RA - x = LCL

=).58(0.2204-10.728RA + x = UCL

2

2

10.601

10.856

=).58(0.2204-10.728RA - x = LCL

=).58(0.2204-10.728RA + x = UCL

2

2

10.550

10.600

10.650

10.700

10.750

10.800

10.850

10.900

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Sample

Mea

ns

UCL

LCL

26

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Example of x-bar and R charts: Steps 5&6. Calculate R-chart and Plot Values

0

0.46504

)2204.0)(0(R D= LCL

)2204.0)(11.2(R D= UCL

3

4

0

0.46504

)2204.0)(0(R D= LCL

)2204.0)(11.2(R D= UCL

3

4

0.000

0.100

0.200

0.300

0.400

0.500

0.600

0.700

0.800

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Sample

RUCL

LCL

R

27

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Basic Forms of Statistical Sampling for Quality Control

• Acceptance Sampling is sampling to accept or reject the immediate lot of product at hand— Does not necessarily determine quality level— Results subject to sampling error

• Statistical Process Control is sampling to determine if the process is within acceptable limits— Takes steps to increase quality

28

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Acceptance Sampling

• Purposes— Make decision about (sentence) a product— Ensure quality is within predetermined level?

• Advantages– Economy– Less handling damage– Fewer inspectors– Upgrading of the inspection job– Applicability to destructive testing– Entire lot rejection (motivation for improvement)

29

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Acceptance Sampling (Continued)

• Disadvantages— Risks of accepting “bad” lots and

rejecting “good” lots— Added planning and documentation— Sample provides less information than

100-percent inspection

30

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Acceptance Sampling: Single Sampling Plan

A simple goal

Determine:

(1) how many units, n, to sample from a lot, and

(2) the maximum number of defective items, c, that can be found in the sample before the lot is rejected

31

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Risk

• Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)— Max. acceptable percentage of defectives defined

by producer

• The alpha (Producer’s risk)— The probability of rejecting a good lot

• Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (LTPD)— Percentage of defectives that defines consumer’s

rejection point

• The (Consumer’s risk)— The probability of accepting a bad lot

32

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Operating Characteristic Curve

n = 99c = 4

AQL LTPD

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Percent defective

Pro

bab

ility

of

acce

pta

nce

=.10(consumer’s risk)

a = .05 (producer’s risk)

The OCC brings the concepts of producer’s risk, consumer’s risk, sample size, and maximum defects allowed together

The OCC brings the concepts of producer’s risk, consumer’s risk, sample size, and maximum defects allowed together

The shape or slope of the curve is dependent on a particular combination of the four parameters

The shape or slope of the curve is dependent on a particular combination of the four parameters

33

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Example: Acceptance Sampling Problem

Zypercom, a manufacturer of video interfaces, purchases printed wiring boards from an outside vender, Procard. Procard has set an acceptable quality level of 1% and accepts a 5% risk of rejecting lots at or below this level. Zypercom considers lots with 3% defectives to be unacceptable and will assume a 10% risk of accepting a defective lot.

Develop a sampling plan for Zypercom and determine a rule to be followed by the receiving inspection personnel.

Zypercom, a manufacturer of video interfaces, purchases printed wiring boards from an outside vender, Procard. Procard has set an acceptable quality level of 1% and accepts a 5% risk of rejecting lots at or below this level. Zypercom considers lots with 3% defectives to be unacceptable and will assume a 10% risk of accepting a defective lot.

Develop a sampling plan for Zypercom and determine a rule to be followed by the receiving inspection personnel.

34

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Example: Step 1. What is given and

what is not?

In this problem, AQL is given to be 0.01 and LTDP is given to be 0.03. We are also given an alpha of 0.05 and a beta of 0.10.

In this problem, AQL is given to be 0.01 and LTDP is given to be 0.03. We are also given an alpha of 0.05 and a beta of 0.10.

What you need to determine is your sampling plan is “c” and “n.”

What you need to determine is your sampling plan is “c” and “n.”

35

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Example: Step 2. Determine “c”

First divide LTPD by AQL.First divide LTPD by AQL.LTPD

AQL =

.03

.01 = 3

LTPD

AQL =

.03

.01 = 3

Then find the value for “c” by selecting the value in the TN7.10 “n(AQL)”column that is equal to or just greater than the ratio above.

Then find the value for “c” by selecting the value in the TN7.10 “n(AQL)”column that is equal to or just greater than the ratio above.

Exhibit TN 7.10Exhibit TN 7.10

c LTPD/AQL n AQL c LTPD/AQL n AQL0 44.890 0.052 5 3.549 2.6131 10.946 0.355 6 3.206 3.2862 6.509 0.818 7 2.957 3.9813 4.890 1.366 8 2.768 4.6954 4.057 1.970 9 2.618 5.426

So, c = 6.So, c = 6.

36

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Example: Step 3. Determine Sample Size

c = 6, from Tablen (AQL) = 3.286, from TableAQL = .01, given in problem

c = 6, from Tablen (AQL) = 3.286, from TableAQL = .01, given in problem

Sampling Plan:Take a random sample of 329 units from a lot. Reject the lot if more than 6 units are defective.

Sampling Plan:Take a random sample of 329 units from a lot. Reject the lot if more than 6 units are defective.

Now given the information below, compute the sample size in units to generate your sampling plan

Now given the information below, compute the sample size in units to generate your sampling plan

n(AQL/AQL) = 3.286/.01 = 328.6, or 329 (always round up)n(AQL/AQL) = 3.286/.01 = 328.6, or 329 (always round up)

37

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Standard Table of Sampling Plans

• MIL-STD-105D— For attribute sampling plans— Needs to know:

The lot size N The inspection level (I, II, III) The AQL Type of sampling (single, double,

multiple) Type of inspection (normal, tightened,

reduced)

• Find a code letter then read plan from Table

38

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Standard Table of Sampling Plans:Single Sampling Plan

• Example: If N=2000 and AQL=0.65% find the normal, tightened, and reduced single sampling plan using inspection level II.

39

©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004

Standard Table of Sampling Plans:Double Sampling Plan

• Example: If N=20,000 and AQL=1.5% find the normal, tightened, and reduced double sampling plan using inspection level I.