1 the role of bioavailability in pharmaceutical product development alwyn pidgen pharmacokinetics...

32
1 The Role of Bioavailability The Role of Bioavailability in in Pharmaceutical Product Pharmaceutical Product Development Development Alwyn Pidgen Alwyn Pidgen Pharmacokinetics consultant Pharmacokinetics consultant

Upload: meaghan-babington

Post on 01-Apr-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

The Role of BioavailabilityThe Role of Bioavailability

in in

Pharmaceutical Product Pharmaceutical Product DevelopmentDevelopment

Alwyn PidgenAlwyn PidgenPharmacokinetics consultantPharmacokinetics consultant

2

FormulationsFormulations include:- include:-

Tablet, Suspension, Capsule, Solution, PowderTablet, Suspension, Capsule, Solution, Powder Aerosol, Nebulizer, Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI)Aerosol, Nebulizer, Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) Lotion, Ointment, CreamLotion, Ointment, Cream Suppository, Rectal solution, ImplantsSuppository, Rectal solution, Implants

Different routes Different routes && formulations formulations can impact thecan impact the speed speed andand completeness completeness of drug of drug absorptionabsorption

INTRAVASCULARINTRAVASCULAR IntravenousIntravenous

EXTRAVASCULAREXTRAVASCULAR Intra-muscular; Subcutaneous; Oral; Intra-muscular; Subcutaneous; Oral; Rectal; Topical; Rectal; Topical; Inhalation; Intranasal; Inhalation; Intranasal; Transdermal; Sublingual; BuccalTransdermal; Sublingual; Buccal

3

Absolute bioavailabilityAbsolute bioavailability - Is the proportion of intact - Is the proportion of intact drug, which reaches the systemic circulation drug, which reaches the systemic circulation following following extravascular extravascular administration when administration when compared to an compared to an intravenousintravenous dose. dose.

Absolute BioavailabilityAbsolute Bioavailability

F(abs) = F(abs) = AUC(oral)AUC(oral) * * Dose(iv)Dose(iv) AUC(iv) AUC(iv) Dose(oral)Dose(oral)

iviv

oraloral

CC

TimTimee

4

Relative BioavailabilityRelative Bioavailability

F(rel) = F(rel) = AUC(rectal)AUC(rectal) * * Dose(oral)Dose(oral) AUC(oral) Dose(rectal)AUC(oral) Dose(rectal)

rectalrectal

oraloral

Relative bioavailabilityRelative bioavailability - Is the bioavailability of one - Is the bioavailability of one dosage formdosage form (e.g. tablet) relative to another (e.g. (e.g. tablet) relative to another (e.g. capsule) - or one capsule) - or one route of administrationroute of administration (e.g. (e.g. rectal) relative to another (e.g. oral).rectal) relative to another (e.g. oral).

CC

TimeTime

5

BioequivalenceBioequivalence

Two medicinal products can be classed Two medicinal products can be classed as as bioequivalent bioequivalent when their when their raterate and and extentextent of of absorption absorption meet strict meet strict regulatory requirements after regulatory requirements after administration of the administration of the same molar dose.same molar dose.

6

Medicinal products are called Medicinal products are called Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical

equivalentsequivalents if they contain the if they contain the same amountsame amount

of the of the same active substancesame active substance in the in the same same

dosage formdosage form, which meet the same or , which meet the same or

comparable standards.comparable standards.

Pharmaceutical equivalencePharmaceutical equivalence

7

Particle sizeParticle size Physico-chemical factors of drugPhysico-chemical factors of drug SolubilitySolubility Use of different excipientsUse of different excipients Degree of agitationDegree of agitation Change in manufacturing processChange in manufacturing process FoodFood

HOWEVER -HOWEVER - Pharmaceutical equivalence Pharmaceutical equivalence does not does not

automatically assure automatically assure bioequivalencebioequivalence mainly due mainly due

to changes in to changes in dissolutiondissolution, which can be influenced , which can be influenced

by: -by: -

8

In general, the In general, the smaller the particle sizesmaller the particle size the the faster the faster the absorption.absorption. The analgesic phenacetin (shown below) The analgesic phenacetin (shown below) was tested in various suspension dosage forms. was tested in various suspension dosage forms.

Particle sizeParticle size

9

  HOWEVERHOWEVER  This is replaced by the This is replaced by the indirectindirect approach of a approach of a bioequivalence trialbioequivalence trial based on the principle that:- based on the principle that:-  ‘‘Two medicinal products that give rise to Two medicinal products that give rise to ‘essentially ‘essentially equivalent’equivalent’ concentrations of the concentrations of the active speciesactive species in blood in blood (viewed as a profile over time) will give (viewed as a profile over time) will give equivalent equivalent therapeutic effects’therapeutic effects’..

KEY CONCEPT IN BIOEQUIVALENCEKEY CONCEPT IN BIOEQUIVALENCE ‘‘Equal amounts of the same drug administered in Equal amounts of the same drug administered in different products will show equal therapeutic effects’.different products will show equal therapeutic effects’.

A A directdirect demonstration of demonstration of therapeutic equivalencetherapeutic equivalence requires a clinical trialrequires a clinical trial

10

Why perform Bioequivalence studies Why perform Bioequivalence studies ??

To enable clinical trial formulations to be To enable clinical trial formulations to be modified or production ‘scaled up’ modified or production ‘scaled up’ throughout a drug’s development.throughout a drug’s development.

To compare a clinical trial formulation with the To compare a clinical trial formulation with the ‘to be marketed’ product just prior to filing.‘to be marketed’ product just prior to filing.

To compare a generic drug product with a To compare a generic drug product with a corresponding reference drug. corresponding reference drug.

To change the dosage regimen by means of a To change the dosage regimen by means of a change in formulation change in formulation • Immediate release Immediate release Modified-release Modified-release

11

When are bioequivalence studies not normally When are bioequivalence studies not normally

needed ?needed ?

If the product differs only in the If the product differs only in the strength of the strength of the active substanceactive substance it contains and the it contains and the pharmacokinetics are linearpharmacokinetics are linear

If the product has been If the product has been slightly reformulatedslightly reformulated or or the manufacturing method slightly modified by the manufacturing method slightly modified by the original manufacturer in ways that can be the original manufacturer in ways that can be argued to be irrelevant argued to be irrelevant (using in-vitro tests)(using in-vitro tests)

If the product is to be administered If the product is to be administered parenterallyparenterally as a solution and contains the same active as a solution and contains the same active substances and excipients as a medicinal productsubstances and excipients as a medicinal product currently approvedcurrently approved..

12

If the product is a If the product is a liquid oral form in solutionliquid oral form in solution containing the active substance in the same containing the active substance in the same concentration and form as a concentration and form as a currently approved currently approved medicinal productmedicinal product

An An acceptable correlationacceptable correlation between dissolution between dissolution rate in-vivo and in-vitro has been shown (FDA rate in-vivo and in-vitro has been shown (FDA guidance).guidance).

Products intended for Products intended for local uselocal use to act to act without without systemic absorptionsystemic absorption

13

F1 = Tablet (kit) F2 = Tablet (co-precipitate) F3 = F1 = Tablet (kit) F2 = Tablet (co-precipitate) F3 = SoftgelSoftgel

FDA Criteria met for F2 Tablet (co-precipitate) & F1 Tablet (Kit) FDA Criteria met for F2 Tablet (co-precipitate) & F1 Tablet (Kit) but not for F3 (Softgel).but not for F3 (Softgel).

14

Healthy volunteersHealthy volunteers

Male subjects or women of non-child bearing Male subjects or women of non-child bearing potentialpotential

Aged between 18 and 55Aged between 18 and 55

Single dose.Single dose.

Crossover designCrossover design – first choice – first choice

Parallel group designParallel group design - for drugs with long half- - for drugs with long half-liveslives

Replicate designReplicate design - for highly variable drugs - for highly variable drugs

Typical Study Design FeaturesTypical Study Design Features

15

Should be appropriately Should be appropriately statistically poweredstatistically powered if study is pivotal for filingif study is pivotal for filing

An estimate of a drug’s An estimate of a drug’s intrinsic variabilityintrinsic variability is is obtained from previous studies or obtained from previous studies or publicationspublications

Should not be smallerShould not be smaller than 12 than 12

SAMPLE SIZESAMPLE SIZE

16

For an inactive For an inactive pro-drugpro-drug the main the main active active metabolitemetabolite should be measured if the plasma should be measured if the plasma levels of the levels of the parentparent are are too lowtoo low for accurate for accurate assay measurement. assay measurement.

What to measureWhat to measure

For BE studies - measurement of For BE studies - measurement of plasma plasma concentrationsconcentrations of the of the parent drugparent drug are are recommended.recommended.

Parent drug is more sensitive to formulation changes Parent drug is more sensitive to formulation changes than any metabolite.than any metabolite.

Examples of prodrugsExamples of prodrugs EnalaprilEnalapril (hypertension) is metabolised to the active (hypertension) is metabolised to the active

form form EnalaprilatEnalaprilat

ValacyclovirValacyclovir (herpes virus) is metabolised to the active (herpes virus) is metabolised to the active form form AcyclovirAcyclovir

17

Enantiomers versus RacematesEnantiomers versus Racemates

For BE studies measurement of the For BE studies measurement of the racemate racemate is is recommended.recommended.

If one enantiomer is pharmacologically active If one enantiomer is pharmacologically active and the other contributes little to activity, it is and the other contributes little to activity, it is sufficient to demonstrate bioequivalence for the sufficient to demonstrate bioequivalence for the active enantiomer only.active enantiomer only.

Measurement of Measurement of individual enantiomersindividual enantiomers is is recommended if:-recommended if:- The enantiomers have different PK or PD The enantiomers have different PK or PD

characteristicscharacteristics The exposure (AUC ratio) of the enantiomers is The exposure (AUC ratio) of the enantiomers is

modified by a difference in the rate of modified by a difference in the rate of absorption.absorption.

18

Endogenous substancesEndogenous substances

Difficult area. A pilot study may be useful to check Difficult area. A pilot study may be useful to check the effect. the effect. Baseline correctionBaseline correction of background of background levels are required to ensure that drug levels levels are required to ensure that drug levels reflect the treatments under test. reflect the treatments under test. A longer A longer washout period may be required.washout period may be required.

Fixed combinationsFixed combinations

A A separate BE analysisseparate BE analysis should be performed on should be performed on each active substanceeach active substance in a fixed combination. This in a fixed combination. This is achieved by considering all other active is achieved by considering all other active substances (in turn) as excipients.substances (in turn) as excipients.

19

Peak exposurePeak exposure

Important parameter - may have potential links to safety Important parameter - may have potential links to safety and/or efficacy.and/or efficacy.

Parameter is Maximum observed drug concentrationParameter is Maximum observed drug concentration (Cmax)(Cmax)

PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERSPHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS

Early exposureEarly exposure

Only consider if making a claim for Only consider if making a claim for clinically relevant clinically relevant rapid release - and/or - if onset of action is related to rapid release - and/or - if onset of action is related to adverse events.adverse events. Rapid onset of analgesic effectRapid onset of analgesic effect Avoidance of excessive hypotensive actionAvoidance of excessive hypotensive action

Parameters includeParameters include AUC( AUC(0–tmax0–tmax) ) (FDA)(FDA) andand tmax tmax (EMEA)(EMEA)

20

ParametersParameters

AUC to the last measurable time point AUC to the last measurable time point (AUC(AUC0-t0-t)) AUC truncated at 72h AUC truncated at 72h (AUC(AUC0-720-72)) – (EMEA only) – (EMEA only) AUC extrapolated to infinite time AUC extrapolated to infinite time (AUC(AUC0-inf0-inf))

o The elimination rate constant The elimination rate constant (kel)(kel) and terminal half- and terminal half-life life (t(t1/21/2)) should be reported - particularly if should be reported - particularly if AUC(AUC(0-0-

infinf)) is used. is used.

Total exposureTotal exposure

This is the most important BE parameter since AUC is This is the most important BE parameter since AUC is directlydirectly proportional to the amount of drug absorbed.proportional to the amount of drug absorbed.

21

STATISTICAL ANALYSISSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Calculate 90% Calculate 90% confidence intervalsconfidence intervals of the ratio of the of the ratio of the treatment means (test/reference) for treatment means (test/reference) for CmaxCmax, and , and AUCAUC..The data are log transformed prior to analysisThe data are log transformed prior to analysis..

If statistical evaluation of If statistical evaluation of tmaxtmax is required then a is required then a non-parametric hypothesis testnon-parametric hypothesis test is performed on the is performed on the untransformed data.untransformed data.

22

Bioequivalence regionBioequivalence region

For Bioequivalence - the ratio of the For Bioequivalence - the ratio of the geometric means geometric means µµTT/µ/µRR of the test and of the test and reference products must bereference products must be ≥ 0.8 ≥ 0.8 andand ≤ 1.25 ≤ 1.25..

0.80.8 1.21.255

BioequivalencBioequivalence e

regionregion

Bio-Bio-inequivalence inequivalence

regionregion

Bio-Bio-inequivalence inequivalence

regionregion

µµTT/µ/µRR

23

tmaxtmax : Only consider : Only consider if clinically relevant rapid release is if clinically relevant rapid release is claimed and/or onset of action is related to adverse events.claimed and/or onset of action is related to adverse events.

AUCAUC : test treatment to be within : test treatment to be within ≥≥ 0.8 and 0.8 and ≤≤ 1.25 of the 1.25 of the reference treatment (FDA and EMEA)reference treatment (FDA and EMEA)

Range to be tightened in the case of a drug with a narrow Range to be tightened in the case of a drug with a narrow therapeutic window (e.g. digoxin, phenytoin) (FDA and therapeutic window (e.g. digoxin, phenytoin) (FDA and EMEA). This may also be applicable to Cmax.EMEA). This may also be applicable to Cmax.

CmaxCmax : : test treatment to be within test treatment to be within ≥≥ 0.8 and 0.8 and ≤≤ 1.25 of the 1.25 of the reference treatmentreference treatment (FDA and EMEA)(FDA and EMEA)

A wider interval may be acceptable (EMEA only). A wider interval may be acceptable (EMEA only). The actual The actual limits vary according to the within-subject variability (%CV) limits vary according to the within-subject variability (%CV) noted in the bioequivalence study. See EMEA guidelines for noted in the bioequivalence study. See EMEA guidelines for details.details.

The Regulatory acceptance criteriaThe Regulatory acceptance criteria

24

Propafenone – anti-arrhythmic drugPropafenone – anti-arrhythmic drug Undergoes extensive first-pass metabolismUndergoes extensive first-pass metabolism Variable half-lifeVariable half-life

Bioequivalence study undertakenBioequivalence study undertaken

Apotex (Reference) v Rhythmol (Test)Apotex (Reference) v Rhythmol (Test)

300mg tablet 300mg tablet

18 healthy subjects18 healthy subjects

2-way crossover2-way crossover

An exampleAn example

‘‘Highly Variable Drugs:Experience with Propafenone’ -Highly Variable Drugs:Experience with Propafenone’ -Yu Yu Chung Tsang, Radu Pop & Michael SpinoChung Tsang, Radu Pop & Michael Spino http://www.ualberta.ca/~csps/JPPS1(2)/Y.Tsang/Tsang.pdfhttp://www.ualberta.ca/~csps/JPPS1(2)/Y.Tsang/Tsang.pdf

25

Mean Plasma concentrationsMean Plasma concentrations

26

Individual variabilityIndividual variability

27

Pharmacokinetic parametersPharmacokinetic parameters

Statistical analysisStatistical analysis

28

Reasons for BE failureReasons for BE failure

Very high Very high inter-subjectinter-subject CV for Cmax & CV for Cmax & AUCAUC

High overall High overall intra-subjectintra-subject variability variability (46%)(46%)

Variability in elimination characteristicsVariability in elimination characteristics

The The metabolismmetabolism of propafenone is of propafenone is influenced by influenced by geneticsgeneticso tt1/21/2 (fast metabolisers) = 2-10h (fast metabolisers) = 2-10ho tt1/21/2 (slow metabolisers) = 10-32h (slow metabolisers) = 10-32ho Drug levels 5 times higher in slow Drug levels 5 times higher in slow

metabolisersmetabolisers

29

Hot topic – large market potential – lot of issuesHot topic – large market potential – lot of issues

More More regulatoryregulatory obstacles than with traditional obstacles than with traditional ‘small molecule’ generics.‘small molecule’ generics. FDA position still under reviewFDA position still under review EMEA guidance availableEMEA guidance available Numerous position papersNumerous position papers

Current ANDA approach Current ANDA approach not considered not considered scientifically appropriatescientifically appropriate for biotechnology for biotechnology productsproducts

Companies asked to show Companies asked to show ‘biosimilarity’‘biosimilarity’ – this – this involves involves clinical trialsclinical trials to demonstrate to demonstrate safety/efficacysafety/efficacy

Biogenerics – current statusBiogenerics – current status

30

Protein productsProtein products have a greater structural have a greater structural complexity, often difficult to characterize and have complexity, often difficult to characterize and have a much higher molecular weight than a much higher molecular weight than ‘small ‘small molecule drugs’molecule drugs’. .

They can be mixtures of They can be mixtures of many molecular speciesmany molecular species and can have and can have unique impurity profilesunique impurity profiles that depend that depend upon the upon the manufacturing processmanufacturing process..

Biogenerics – why the problems ?Biogenerics – why the problems ?

31

Small changesSmall changes in the manufacturing process can in the manufacturing process can lead to lead to big changesbig changes in the drugs safety & in the drugs safety & efficacy. FDA collecting examples to evaluate this efficacy. FDA collecting examples to evaluate this claim.claim.

Improvements in Improvements in protein technologyprotein technology mean mean manufacturers can no longer produce a protein manufacturers can no longer produce a protein that would have identical characteristics to the that would have identical characteristics to the original.original.

ImplicationsImplications - altered PK & PD of the protein - - altered PK & PD of the protein - ultimately leading to ultimately leading to clinical implicationsclinical implications..

Biogenerics - manufactureBiogenerics - manufacture

32

FDA FDA (www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm)(www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm) Bioavailability & Bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug Bioavailability & Bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug

products – general considerations – March 2003 products – general considerations – March 2003 Food-effect Bioavailability & Fed Bioequivalence studies – December Food-effect Bioavailability & Fed Bioequivalence studies – December

2002 2002 Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms - Scale-Up and Post-Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms - Scale-Up and Post-

approval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls; In Vitro approval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls; In Vitro Dissolution Testing and In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation – Dissolution Testing and In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation – Sept 1997Sept 1997

Dissolution testing of Immediate release solid oral dosage forms - Dissolution testing of Immediate release solid oral dosage forms - Aug 97Aug 97

Extended release oral dosage forms : Development, Evaluation & Extended release oral dosage forms : Development, Evaluation & Application of In-vitro/In-vivo correlations – Sept 97Application of In-vitro/In-vivo correlations – Sept 97

EMEA (www.emea.europa.eu/index/indexh1.htm)EMEA (www.emea.europa.eu/index/indexh1.htm) Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence - January 2010 - Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence - January 2010 -

Doc. Ref.CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98Doc. Ref.CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98 Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal products – November 2004Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal products – November 2004 Note for guidance on quality of Modified Release products (A Oral Note for guidance on quality of Modified Release products (A Oral

dosage forms; B Transdermal dosage forms) – July 1999dosage forms; B Transdermal dosage forms) – July 1999 Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products – Nov 2004Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products – Nov 2004 Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products containing Guideline on Similar Biological Medicinal Products containing

Biotechnology-derived Proteins as active substance: Quality Issues – Biotechnology-derived Proteins as active substance: Quality Issues – June 2005June 2005

Useful Regulatory Guidance documentsUseful Regulatory Guidance documents