1 tier 1 education: review participant training january 2014 2014 americorps external reviewer...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Tier 1 Education: Review Participant Training
January 2014
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training
2
Content
The Charge: Turnaround School Improvement Grants (SIG)
Overview Models Guidelines
This Opportunity The Need The Goals
The U.S. ranks 16th in the world in college attainment
Korea
Canad
a
Japa
n
Russia
n Fed
erat
ion
Irelan
d
Norway
New Z
ealan
d
United
King
dom
Austra
lia
Denm
ark
Luxe
mbo
urg
Franc
eIs
rael
Belgium
Sweden
United
Sta
tes
Nethe
rland
s
Switzer
land
Finlan
dSpa
in
Eston
ia
Icela
nd
Poland
Chile
Sloven
ia
Greec
e
Germ
any
Hunga
ry
63
56 56 55
48 47 4745 45 45 44 43 43 42 42 41 40 40 39 38
37 36 35 35
30 29
26 25
44
Percentage of 25- to 34-year-olds who completed an associate's or higher degree (2009)
“By 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.” – President Obama, February 2009
5
Fewer than 15% of high schools produce half of the nation’s 1.2 million dropouts.
“It’s time for all of us, no matter what our backgrounds, to come together and solve this epidemic. Stemming the tide of dropouts will require turning around our low-performing schools. Just 2,000 high schools in cities like Detroit, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia produce over 50% of America’s dropouts…Let us all make turning around our schools our collective responsibility as Americans.”
- President Obama, March 2009
Source: Robert Balfanz and Nettie Legters, Locating the Dropout Crisis (2004)
8
Guiding Principles
Students who attend a State’s persistently lowest-achieving schools deserve better options and can’t afford to wait
Not quantity, but quality Need to build capacity and supports at all
levels Not a one-year activity
9
Outcomes
Increased student achievement Increased graduation rates
Redesigned SIG
Four rigorous intervention models
States required to competitively award
grants to districts
Elements of Reform
Effective leaders and teachers
Supportive and safe school environment
Operational flexibilities and
capacity building
Strong, aligned, and responsive
instruction
Resources
Historic investment – over $4.5B since
2009
Up to $2M per school
The redesigned SIG program requires rigorous interventions and dramatically increases resources for the lowest-performing schools
Increased time for teaching and
collaboration
Family and community engagement
Distribution of SIG Funds
U.S. Department of Education (ED) to State educational agencies (SEAs): Formula grants based on each State’s share of
funds under Title I, Parts A, C, and D SEAs to local educational agencies (LEAs):
Competitive grants LEAs to schools: $50,000 - $2M per school
10
LEA Responsibilities
Eligible Schools Applies to serve all or subset of eligible schools in the LEA
Review Criteria Develops a needs assessment to determine which of the four required intervention models fits best with the needs of each Tier I, Tier II or Priority school
4 models Applies to implement one of the four required intervention models in eligible Tier I, Tier II or Priority schools. LEA selects model after an analysis of local data, resources, and capacity.
Prioritization Must serve Tier I schools it has the capacity to serve. May not apply to serve any Tier III school if it has not served at least one of its Tier I or II schools
ORMust serve Priority schools it has capacity to serve that apply for and are awarded SIG funding
Budget Submits three-year budget for each school it applies to serve ($50K-$2M per year)
Goals Proposes achievement goals for each Tier I, II, and III or Priority school
11
13
Transformation Model Overview
Teachers and Leaders
• Replace principal• Implement new
evaluation system• Developed with
staff• Uses student
growth as a significant factor
• Identify and reward staff who are increasing student outcomes; support and then remove those who are not
• Implement strategies to recruit, place, and retain staff
Instructional and Support Strategies
• Select and implement an instructional model based on student needs
• Provide job-embedded professional development designed to build capacity and support staff
• Ensure continuous use of data to inform and differentiate instruction
Time and Support
• Provide increased learning time• Staff and students
• Provide ongoing mechanism for community and family engagement
• Partner to provide social-emotional and community-oriented services and supports
Governance
• Provide sufficient operating flexibility to implement reform
• Ensure ongoing technical assistance
Turnaround Model Overview
Teachers and Leaders
• Replace principal• Use locally
adopted “turnaround” competencies to review and select staff for school (rehire no more than 50% of existing staff)
• Implement strategies to recruit, place, and retain staff
Instructional and Support Strategies
• Select and implement an instructional model based on student needs
• Provide job-embedded PD designed to build capacity and support staff
• Ensure continuous use of data to inform and differentiate instruction
Time and Support
• Provide increased learning time• Staff and
students• Social-emotional
and community- oriented services and supports
Governance
• New governance structure
• Grant operating flexibility to school leader
May also implement any of the required or permissible strategies under the Transformation Model
14
Restart Model Overview
A restart model must enroll, within the grades it serves, any former student who wishes to attend the school.
A rigorous review process could take such things into consideration as an applicant’s team, track record, instructional program, model’s theory of action, sustainability.
As part of this model, the SEA must review the process the LEA will use/has used to select the partner
15
17
The Need for Tier 1 Education
Throughout the early stages of SIG implementation, States and districts have repeatedly expressed, or demonstrated through department monitoring, a need for capacity building in five primary areas: Addressing specific school-type challenges (especially small/rural schools
and middle schools); Addressing specific intervention challenges (especially increased learning
time, turnaround leadership, students’ nonacademic needs, and community/family engagement);
Building and making transparent turnaround data, knowledge, and evidence;
Sustaining effective interventions in successful turnaround schools; Developing a comprehensive turnaround approach for schools
implementing SIG interventions, turnaround principles under Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) flexibility, and reform strategies through Race-to-the-Top.
18
The Goals for Tier 1 Education
To leverage AmeriCorps’s existing national service infrastructure and national and community partnerships to concentrate AmeriCorps members in schools undertaking turnaround efforts promoted by ED through SIG and/or ESEA flexibility;
To scale up existing AmeriCorps efforts in turnaround schools; To introduce AmeriCorps members to schools and areas that have
difficulty gaining access to AmeriCorps members; To provide resources to address implementation challenges relating
to increased learning time and social-emotional supports; and To inspire a wide range of local and national partners, including
philanthropic organizations, to take on the challenge of school turnaround.
19
Evidence for Aligned and Rigorous Interventions
In addition to exclusively funding turnaround interventions in low-performing schools, Tier 1 Education AmeriCorps grantees must implement interventions that have at least a preliminary evidence basis.
Tier 1 Education AmeriCorps grantees will serve exclusively in low-performing schools where their efforts are needed most, and where there is already a turnaround plan in place through a state’s implementation of its ESEA flexibility plan or a SIG.
Applicants must submit a letter of commitment signed by district and school leaders. Furthermore, applicants must demonstrate how the proposed intervention is aligned with existing district and school turnaround plans.
20
Six Strategies of Focus in the Notice
AmeriCorps members in these schools will work to: Provide ongoing mechanisms for family and community engagement; Establish a school culture and environment that improve school safety,
attendance, and discipline and address other non-academic factors that impact student achievement, such as students’ social, emotional, and health needs;
Accelerate students’ acquisition of reading and mathematics knowledge and skills;
Increase graduation rates through strategies such as early warning systems, credit-recovery programs, and re-engagement strategies;
Increase college enrollment rates through college preparation counseling to include completing the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) and college applications, and educating students and their families on financial literacy for college; or
Support school implementation of increased learning time.