10 special rights in property: why modern african

19
10 Special rights in p rop erty: why modern Aic economies are dependent on mineral resources Keith Breckenrid g e Historians have explained the importance of mining in Africa in many diff erel ways. The most i mpor tan t - and most common - of these has been the specula- tive rewards offered by the investment markets in London, or, in relation to oil, d1e global commodity markets. In these accounts, the undeniable attractions of metro p olitan p rofits have motivated and sustai.ned investors, managers and governments in the pursuit of African mineral resources. Other schols have focused on the strategic importance of resources like uranium, gold or oil to account for the determination of the British, French and American governments to secure access to African mineral resources. Looking for local determinants, many historians have point ed to the neat fit between the labour requirements of mining d d1e labour mobilizing powers of indirect rulers. More recently scholars have shown how the systems of oscillang lon g -distance migrant labo have drawn upon, and reproduced, the gendered household roles and ex p ecta- ons (Ally 1994, Harrie 1994, Moodie 1994, Hecht 2002).All of me se expla- nations have real explanatory power, but in this chapter I want to draw attention to another feature of miner resources which distinguishes em from e other assets in the continent's economy: the Simplicity, p reci s ion and consistency of property rights in mineral resources. In this chapter, I first consider whether mineral resources ar, in fact, very importan t in the working of modern African economies, weighing them up against the other, much more popular, domains of economic activity. I then tu to a history of mining development, offering a five-stage periodization in order to account for the special place of mining in many African economies. The chap t er tries to show that the developmental benefits of mining, such as they are, hav been restricted to a spec i nd of metal mining, d that diamond d oil extraction are unlikely to repeat them. But I do also offer a wider conceptual explation for the importance of mg many African economies. Rug

Upload: others

Post on 10-Jan-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

10

Special rights in property:

why modern African economies are

dependent on mineral resources

Keith Breckenridge

Historians have explained the importance of mining in Africa in many differeIll

ways. The most i mportan t - and most common - of these has been the specula­

tive rewards offered by the investment markets in London, or, in relation to oil,

d1e global commodity markets. In these accounts, the undeniable attractions of

metropolitan profits have motivated and sustai.ned investors, managers and

governments in the pursuit of African mineral resources. Other scholars have

focused on the strategic importance of resources like uranium, gold or oil to

account for the determination of the British, French and American governments

to secure access to African mineral resources. Looking for local determinants,

many historians have pointed to the neat fit between the labour requirements of

mining and d1e labour mobilizing powers of indirect rulers. More recently

scholars have shown how the systems of oscillating long-distance migrant labour

have drawn upon, and reproduced, the gendered household roles and expecta­

tions (Ally 1994, Harrie::. 1994, Moodie 1994, Hecht 2002).All of me se expla­

nations have real explanatory power, but in this chapter I want to draw attention

to another feature of mineral resources which distinguishes them from the other

assets in the continent's economy: the Simplicity, preci sion and consistency of

property rights in mineral resources.

In this chapter, I first consider whether mineral resources arc:, in fact, very

importan t in the working::. of modern African economies, weighing them up

against the other, much more popular, domains of economic activity. I then turn

to a history of mining development, offering a five-stage periodization in order

to account for the special place of mining in many African economies. The

chap ter tries to show that the developmental benefits of mining, such as they are,

have: been restricted to a special kind of metal mining, and that diamond and oil

extraction are unlikely to repeat them. But I do also offer a wider conceptual

explanation for the importance of mining in many African economies. Running

Page 2: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

144 Hislory. historians illlO drvelopment poliql

through all or these stages of mining h i story is. I think. a much simpler and more definite form of properly than is otherwise available in Africa. I argue that it is

this special form of property right that has susta ined mining as the dominant

source of foreign investment in many African economies.

The significance of mineral resources in African economic history

The current UNCTAD World Investment Report makes the point SUCCinctly:

almost all of the $36 billion that Africa.n economies attracted in Foreign Direct Inwstment in 2006 was directed at the exploitation of 'oil. gas and mining'

resources. The 2006 flgure is mon.: than double. the total for 2004, and it reflects global corporate interest in the mineral resources of the continent. One striking

feature of these current capital flows is rhe unprecedented involvement of Asian

corporations who make Up a quartpr of the spend ing ; another is the investment

of some $8 billion in the mining resources of the poorest countries on the

continent. Sudan, Equatorial Guinea, Chad, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Zambia, Uganda,

Burundi, Madaga�car and Mali all attracted 'investors seeking new mining

locations in response tu rising global demand and high comIllodities prices'

(UNCTAD 2007). Yet the problem of African economil dependence on minerals is more paradoxical than it flrc;t apppars.

Foreign investment is a fickle indicatol of the key characteristics of na(ional

economies. This current round of global interest in the mining assets on the continent dates only from the turn of the current century, and it marks a very

welcome end to the long commodities slump that began for most industrial

metals in the mid-1970s, and for gold and oil a decad e later. That slump, as

Ferguson has shown for the Copperbelt, was experienced by many people

employed in tlw largest mining industries in Zambia, Congo, Namjbia and South

Africa as a traumatic failure of the 'plotline of development'. We would, I suspect,

hav(" been worrying about a very different problem of dependency just ten years

ago when copper (and many other commodity) prices had hit their historical

nadir, and thou::;ands of urban Zambians were returning to the countryside

(Ferguson 1999: 256).

The geology of Africa is also misleading. In his 1986 economic history of the

continent, Wickins warned of the false promise of the mineral remedy,

r('minding us that uf all the countries on the continent onJy a quarter have

valuable mineral reserves, and' fewer than a tenth have considerable deposits of

oil' (Wickins 1986: 310). The geological picture for oil ha� changed a link with the discovery of nevv' fields in Chad, Equawrial Guinea and tiny Sao Tome and

Principe, but Wickins' point retains its essential power. In Sub-Saluran Africa the

oil fields are concentrated in the Gulf of Guinea, a tight band of mostly offshore

fields from Cabinda. the Angolan exclave province that collars the Congo, to the Niger Delea. Similarly, mining investment has been overwhelmingly concentrated

in south"rn Africa and in the Central African copperbelt (Frankel 1969). There

Page 3: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

Why modern AIricwl economies are dependent on mineml resources 245

are coumries - such as Angola and Nigeria -- that have valuable mining and oil

reserves, but most African countries have neitl1('r.

The predominance of mineral resources in the investment (and export)

figures for the continent re-Hects the tact that the most irnportant economic

dctivity - subsistence farming - is offlcially insignificant. The absence of invest­

ment, or significant exports , from farming, whjch employs three-quarters of the

people on the continent and contributes only a third of GDP, reflects farmers' pervasive withdrawal from the market (World Bank 2007: 3). As Berry has demonstrated, the economically defensive stance that most African farmers assume is the product of a century of systematic uncertainty and indecision in

the state's attitude to agriculture (Berry 1993). The recent World Bank decision to

focus on a green re\·olution in Africa is correc t and laudable , but it also risks

adding yet another episode of official interference to a century of confusion (World Bank 2007).

Informal trade is the other key area of economic activity on the continent

and, by defmition, it rarely featurc>s in official economic statistics. Yet there can

be little doubt that trade, much of it illegal , is more significant for the real

workings of African economies, and their citizens, than mining (MacGaffey

1991). Measuring econornic activity that often seeks to explOit the value-gaps

crea ted between states is no Simple matter; 'national frontiers in Africa', Ellis and

Macgaffey observe, 'may themselves be considered a resource' (Ellis and MacGaffey 1996: 32). Yet trade is undeniably critical lCroSS the continent. The ubiqUitous opportunities for subsistence trading contribute to the flimsy hold

that farmers maintain over their labourers (and their family members) (Berry

1993). Illegal trade is also closely bound to the wholesale looting of state assets

that has been common acros� the continent: Bayart has correctly observed that

official corruption and illegal trade are 'indivisible spheres' of the same activity

(Bayart 1993: 237). The very worthlessness of national currencies provides a

compelling imperative for increased tTadc.:, as traders must carry goods on both

legs of their desired exchange (Ellis and MacGaffey 1996). Viewed across the

half-millennium, trade (in gold , slave:; and ivory) has always provided the most

important opportunities for accumulation on lhe continent (Curtin 1984,

Thornton 1992). Yet, in the modern era, what is striking about the illegal trade

is how much of the high-value, and pulitically significant, tTade is conduc ted in

mining products (consider the Significance of tlle illegal diamond trade tOr Mobuto, Savimhi and Taylor).

The importance of minera l products in African trade is not new; gold long

defined the continent's integration into the world economy. Some of the gold

coins minted in Egypt in the first and second cenruries BC had their origin in

gold mines in the Sudan and, after the expansion of camel tradin g two hundred years later, gold from West Africa began to make its way into the Roman

monetary system. By the sixth century we can speak of a 'flourishing gold trade'

across the Sahara (Garrard 1982: 446-7, 452) When the Portuguese first began

Page 4: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

1. 46 Hisror" historions and del·-e!0plllenl policy

to seek out Sub-Saharan ports in the fourteenth century they famously sought the

source of the African gold trade in order to ci rcumvent the Arab monopoly on

the desert trade; the initial ob j ect of their search was the Senegal . the River of

Gold (Thorn ton 1992: 28-30). It \",'as go ld that barh drew the Europeans to West Africa, and provided the means tor the development of some of the largest West African states, like the Asante (McCaskie ]483: 26, Wilks j 977). In the centuries

after the initial Portuguese contact it was rhe slave trade, and slavery, that

dominated trade, and transformed African societies, but in the era of colonial

rule, from 1880 to the end of the 1950s, mining came to occupy the centre stage of the African economy.

The thesis of Frankel's comprehensive 1939 survey of capital investment in

Africa was that 'mining has been the touchstone of economic development in

most of Africa'. Writing from Juhannesburg during the boom brou ght on by

the abandonment of the Gold Standard in 1 933, his smvey stressed the

Witwatersrand's comparative �;uccess in alleviating the poverty of the region.

For Frankel, the harnessing of European capital, and science, to the massed labour

of Africans, held out the promise of a grea t social transformation of the

continent: the areas of the continent 'most advanced economically are those

whose main activities rest on miner al exploitation'. He had in mind here the

region running from the Congo to the Cape, but he also highlighted the signifl­cance of mine exports from Sierra Leone (diamonds), Nigeria (tin) and the Gold

Coast (gold) .

The key to African development for Frankel, partly in agreelllent with W Anhur Lewis, was the displacement of the 'money crops for export ' v\rith heaVily capitalized mineral extraction. In an interesting reverse on the current concern

about mineral resources, mining was the ob\ri.ous remedy [0 the market vulner­

ability and glacial economic progress of what he called the agricultural 'mono­

cultures'. He was optimistic of the prospects for mining investment as the engine

of development. As things turned out, the overall project of colonial development

was a failure; [he officials who were responsible for the plans, and the funding,

in London (and Paris) began to realize that the costs of colon ial social welfare

would greatly exceed the returns. Frankel's study was written at the beginning of the crisis of decolonization, a process that would see the European powers

abandon their hold on the continent 'in a single generation' (Frankel 1969: 210,

214-1 5, Cooper 1996: 395-6). He was dumbfuunded (as he noted in the

second edition published in 1969) by the rapidity of the decolonization process

but in one respect he was correct : mining resources throughout the continent

continued to attract large: investments between 1940 and [he late 1960s, and both

the colonial and the post-colonial states adopted his idea that mineral explOita­

tion could serve as the engine of development.

Page 5: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

Why modern African economies are dependml on mineral resources 247

Periodizing the developmental character of mineral exploitation

Over the course of the last century the character of mining capital in Africa, and

its political relalionship with the state, has undergone some stanling changes. Let

me list them schematically novo : mining exploitation started Out as the province

of merchants; bet\Neen the De Beers launch in 1886 and the First World War, African mining projects "dre :;ucked into the speculative markets of the City

often without real production of any kind. In the same period, enormous capital

f}o\NS and the special conditions on the Witwatersrand prompted the develop­ment of massive venically integrated industrial corporations; outside of South

Africa these corporations worked with the colonial state in the I 920s to drive the developmemal project of a stabiliLed African proletariat. This developmental

emphaSiS ",as adopted by the post-colonial states VI,. ith a growing preoccupation

after 1970 with Africanizarion and nationalization; by tbe end of the 1980s a

new era of enclave mining had become entrenched, where the development of

mineral resources was rachcally isolatcd from the wider economy and society. I dunk these slufts are intrinsically iJlLere�ting, and that they help to make

sense of the resilience and fleXibility of mining capital in .'\frica, but I want to

examine them now to make a different analytical point: what distinguishes mineral investment in Africa, running like a thread through an of the differem

forms [hat mining capital has taken over the last century, is the centrality of an

uncontested property right (or concession or license) [0 the profitability of investmem. This ability to define, hold and sell a special kind oflegal right in land

over the course of the century is, I think, unique in Africa outside of South Africa. From the days of the Chartered Companies to the current oil multinationals, what

distinguishes mining investment from almost all other forms of investment in

Africa was the ability unambiguously to identify, commoditize and secure

property rights. Often mining investment has cons isted of nothing other than rhe

securing of those rights.

For the twenty years after the discovery of the diamonds in Kimberley, mining investment lay in the hands of merchant capita l . Initially the diamond

tlelds lay formally beyond the legal boundaries of the two wlute states, so the

adventurers who began to pour in to the river and dry diggings (l ike prospectors

everywhere else) dJ-ew up their own rules for the ownership of mi ning claims.

The initial camps were chaotically settled but the two later (and more signiHcan t) farms on which diamonds were discovered were carefully pegged our by a Free

State land sur veyor into hWldreds of claims measuring exactly 31 feet squared.

The diggers resolved that na tives could not own claims, that no digger could O',vn

more than one claim and that the claim would bE: forfeited if it was not worked

for eight consecU[ive days, but these regulations were withdrawn by the new

British administration in October 1871 (Smalherger 1976: 42J-2,Worger 1987:

17). Within months the growing technical difficulties of mining small adjacent properties at depth , the rapidly increasing cost of claims and then tht: declining

price of diamonds began to move the fields into the hands of wealthier

Page 6: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

248 History, hislOriaJlS and del'elopment policy

merchants (see also Tmrell 1982: 51-3). By the middle of the 1870s very large

investments by London-based diamond merchants in the Kimberley claims precipitated thr consolidation of ownership that led to the formation of the De BeLrs monopoly (Worger 1987: 35).

Key to this process was an already existing, and very vigorous. market in land in the Capl:. a market that was, as Keegan sho"vs, assiduously nurtured by reforming colonial administrators after 1820. The substitution of a system of quit-rent freehold properties for the olrl loan farm systems that the Dutch East

India Compani had used in a largely vain attempt to regulate settler property

was the first step in this process. The establishment of a Land Board in 1828, and the appointment of properly qualified land surveyors, marked the begiIming of a period of land speculation that led to 'a fully flpdged settler capitalism that was

tu spread well beyond the original setrler nucleus in Albany district' (Keegan

1996: 57, 1 0 1, 1 68).This market, and the activities of the merchant investors,

eXlended into the comparatively disheveled econumy of the Transvaal Repu blic as

early as the 1850s. when spc·culators based in rhe Cape had bought up the huge lands handed out gratis to Eou settlers (Delius 1983: 128-30).

A different kind of merchant capital dominated mining right� beyond the borders of the white colonies. in places like Nigeria and Zambia the effort to

survey, register and secure property was simply beyond the means of imperial administrators. The chartered companies formed at lhe end of the nineteenth century, modeled in name at least on the seventeenth centillY monopolies, were

initially given extravagant rights of sovereignty over huge territories. The British

companies - Royal Niger Company. British East African Company, and Rhodes '

British South Africa (BSA) Company - all qUickly fuund themselves caught

between the rock of their London investors' expectations and the hard place of

profitability in the ceded territories in Africa. Towards the end of the century thE' Colonial Office also began to seE' the dangers of designing S lates around the expectations of London investors and, after allOWing the East African company to

collapse, both the Niger Company and the BSA Company lost their inflated rights of sovereignty in exchange for a set of claims over land and mineral rights (Slinn 1 971: 365-82,Vai11 976, Freund J981: '32,Young 1994: 61).

Over the course of the twen tie th century these mineral rights were to prove

immensely profitable for the shells that remained of the chartered companies. Both companies were granted the right to impose an (almost en tirely unearned)

royalty on the profits of mining that would make them famously profitable right in to the 1960s. What is interesting about these royalty rights is the way in which the Colonial Office maneuvcred to defend them - uften against the will of their local ofHcials, white settlers and anoinLed African leaders. In marked contrast to

the almost 0pE'n-ended disputes about land ovvnership that the system of indirect rule encouraged (Berry 1993), officials in London responded to the claims of the

Lozi paramount in 1921 that 'whatever happens we cannot duow doubt on the

validity of the concessions'. This determination to protect the legitimacy of the

Page 7: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

Why modern African economies are dependent on nlineral resources 24-9

royalty was repeated up until the vcry momem of independence. In Nigeria the

Niger Company exercised a similar properly right over the la rge tin mines on the

Jos Plateau, allOWing them to deduct fully half of all the revenues due to thE

government up until the Second World War without making any significant

contribution to min ing (Slinn j 97 I, Freund j 981: 32, 2 j 3- j 4).

A,.n imponant feature of this period of merchant dominance was the preoc­

cupation with the profits that could be earned in the City on the basis of the

(often fictional) promise of mining profits in Africa. Thousands of companies

were formed in London between j 880 and j 9 j 4 to exploit claims in South

Africa, Ghana and Nigeria, often with little more basis than a legal right to mine.

Over five hundred companies were established, with a nominal capital of £43 million, to exploit resources in West Africa only before 1904; at the time only

thirteen companies were producing ore (Frankel j 969: j 62-3 ) . A decade later a

similar frenzy of speculative investment struck the tin mining properties in

Nigeria - £ 10 million was invested in an industry that had a total annual product

of £650,000. By the stan of the first world War tllis speculaLive period hart

collapsed under the weight of UIlmet expectations; merchant capital would

survive in African mining through the entire century, but increaSingly the power

to determine both the volume and the ohject of investment passed into the hands

of vertically integrated mining corporations, mostly based in Johannesburg.

CorporatiOns (of the kind that Chandler has sllldied in the US) began to

displace the grip of speculative merchant capital on mining on the Witwatersrand

in the late 18805. The early investors 011 the Rand were merchants, mostly from

the Eastern Cape, looking to repeat the great speculative success of Rhodes ' De

Beers flotation . They had a very weak understanding of both the geulogy and the

technology of deep level mining and very qUickly faced bankruptcy (Webb

1981 ) . It was the introduction of large numbers of American mining engineers,

mostly under the influence of Hamilton Smith and the Rothsch.ild's Exploration

Company - and massive investments of capital from Kimberley and London -

that changed the long -term charactu of mining gold and diamunds in South

Africa. By the start of the 1920s mining in South Africa was dominated by three

very large corporatiuns - Rand Mines, Consolidated Gold Fields, and Anglo­

American - all of which were formed under the management of American

engineers (Marks and Trapido 1979, Turrell and Van Helten j 986, Katz 1999, lOOS) .

Key [0 this process of incorporation was the certainty of mining righ.ts.

Twenty years later the key American engineers remembered the 'liberal and

definite' mining law of the old Transvaal in explicit contrast to the complex' Apex

Law' that bedeviled property rights in the United States (Rickard 1922: 23 J ) . 'A

striking feature of the mining [in tlle Transvaal] was the absence of litigation' , the

American consulting engineer for one of tl1e key German investors remembered:

The Witwatersrand mining area comprises a stretch of country now about 50 miles

long by 2 to 3 miles wide, covered from cnd to end with mining claims grouped

Page 8: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

7 5 0 Hi s ( n ry. h is lOr i ans o n J developmenl po l i C )'

in to mining properties in active operation and often con trol led by men of difft.'rent national i ties . yet a m i n i n g lavvsu i t is a practical ly unheard of t hing, w hile those that have occmred dur ing the past [WeIll )' years can be counted on the fingers of O n e

hand . Thi , is eloqueIll les l imuny to the prac t ica l efficiency of a m i n i n g law that limits t he four s idt's of a min ing cla im by vertical planes . (Rickard 1 9 2 2 : 2 6+)

In this respec t (and many others) th e old Tran svaal proVided a la issez fa i re g reen­house that fostered the n ew mining corpora tions . Ironi cal ly, the m a n agers who demanded that the Boer s tate change to a more thoroughly nrionalizf'd ec()nomy wou l d l a ter look back to the 1 8 9 0 s w i t h nosta l gic regrF' l .

A key feature o f th is era of corpora te domina n ce of gold mining , which clearly dis t inguishes it rrom the later periods, was a very ambitious pro j ect of

soci al transformat ion that the m i ning engineers , and their compan ies , demanded

from the Boer and Bri tish governments. Briefly, the (mostIy Am erican) managers in c harg e of the new gold mining companies sought the establ ishmen t of a

properly capitalis t ag riculture and rai lways , an efftcienl and autonomous state,

and a set of coercive labour regu la t ion s (and polic i ng ins t i tu tions) designed to

bind the contracted workforce to their employers . Many of the: demands made by the mining indu stry were actual ly being m e t the State Attorney, Jan Smu ts , as Sir Al fred Milner determined to go to w a r with the Transvaal in order to secure them ( Chamber of Mines 189 7 , Marks and Trapido 1 9 7 9 ) .

The war between Britain and [he Boer repu blics , devas tat ing a� i t undeniably

was for [he people of [he platteland , formed an importan t pan of this social

trans formation . The Bri tish government spen t extraord inarily l avishly in t h e

effort t o defeat small num bers of highly mobile B oers . The £2 2 0 million spent by the Bri t i sh government between December 1 8 9 9 and May 1 9 0 2 contrasts

c:loquently w i th the r I million annual budget for the entire empire under the

terms of the 1 9 4 0 Colonial Development and Welfare Act. Much of t his h u g e sum

was spen t in Sou th A frica on provisioning and transportation but a lso un railway,

harbour and poliCing infras tr u c ture (Worsfold 1 9 1 3 ) . After 1 9 0 1 the boundary

pro blems that have confronted A frican s tates (Herbst 2 0 0 0 ) for most of the last century were incomprehensi ble in Sourh Africa . Milner also spent heavily o n tIle ex ten s ion of the railway system and the introdu cti on of scientific agricul ture and

irrig ation systems. Some of the fundin g for this very expensivE:' proj ect came

from a low in terest developmen t loan of some £ 3 5 million bu t most was der ived

from a new 1 0 percent profits tax on the mining indus try (a precedent th a t

wou ld serve as the basis of the Sou th A frican g overnment 's subsidization of local ind ustry and agriculture in the late 1 9 2 0s) (Denoon 1 9 7 3 : 4 2 ) .

There is , of course, a bWlclle of paradoxes here. Africans paid a heavy price ,

pul i tically and economically, for the new so ci ety. They were taxed heavily, an d

received only a tiny propor t ion of that t a x b a c k i n education subsidies or infra­

structure. Labour controls , segregation of [he land and popul ation grow tI1 remorselessly weakened the basis of wha t , in [he late nineteenth century, had

been vibrant pe a sant agr icu lture (Beinarr 1 9 8 2 , Bundy 1 9 8 8 ) . By the end of th e

Page 9: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

Why modern Africnn economies o re dependent on m ineral rcsou rm 2 5 1

Depression (as th e gold-mining industry inheri ted the Lm earned bounty from

the s terling devaluat ion a nd the n ew mines of the Orange Free State were being

opened up for developmen t) , the corporations exercised an almos t uncon tested

economic and poli t ica l domina t ion over the 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 migrants who worked in

the mines (Brf'ckenridge 1 9 9 5 ) . A fter the 1 n .? s tr ike African workers were

locked in to the least org anized and skilled j obs . In the long nm these constraints

on A frican e cono m ic activity doomed the prospecr� of growth . Yet it is also true that the developmental preoccupation s of the South African

state between 1 9 0 0 and 1 9 5 0 , reinvigorated by t he Nationalis t s ' determination to foster domestic ind u s try in order to employ poor whites i n the 1 9 2 0s , made i t possible for the country p artially to heal itself of the 'Dutch disease ' (Feins tein

2 0 0 5 : 1 1 3 - 3 5 ) . Gold -mining certainly funded much higher levels of impor ts

than would have otherwise been possi ble : t hrough most of the twentieth century

gold ear n ed be(\veen 4 0 and 7 5 percen t of the country 's expor ts . But over the

long term - a prucess that took the better part of hal f a cent ury - the resources

for the development of the country 's heavy industry came horn the s tate revenues derived from the gold mines (Yudelman 1 9 8 3 ) . This income from gold came in

par t from min eral rights wh i c h retained the state 's owner�hip of gold- bearing

orc and required companies to purchase me rig ht to mine through a system of

l eases . The real revenue windfall followed the passing of the Excess profi ts Tax in

1 9 3 3 in the official reaction to the Hertzog government 's forced abandonment

of the Gold Standard (Katzen 1 9 64 : 5 5-60) . Perhaps more important than

revenue, al though much more difficult to measure, the es tablishment of the 'flits School of Mines, under the patronage of the American mining engineers ,

produced hundreds of SCientifically and tech nologically innovative eng in eers whose work in the corporations , para-statals and universities secured the

diversi ty of South Africa 's industrial economy (Dubow 2 0 0 6 : 2 3 5-+4) .

In the rest of the con tinen t , South African corporate power had less dramatic

but Similarly complex effects on the economi<. place of mining. 1n Nigeria , Consolidated Gold Fie lds was onc of a small number o f imperial mining houses

that set out to domina te a tin mining industry that employed nearly 1 0 0 , 0 0 0

workers by the 1 94 0 s . More importantly, i t was the great fmancial success o f the

Sou th African companies , especially before 1 9 1 4 , that encouraged the flood of speculative investment into the West African min ing companies (Freund 1 9 8 J :

3 0-8) . In Zambia the boundary be tween the BSA chartered compa ny a.nd the

increasingly dominant Soum African corpora t ions began to blur in the late 1 9 2 0s

when Anglo, with the support of the Amer ican Newmont Corporation , became

th(' consul t ing engineers for the new copper mines and the duminant share­ho lder in the chartered company (Gregory 1 9 6 2 : 3 8 4-4 1 2 , Shnn 1 9 7 1 ) .

Something very s imilar occurred in the Nigerian tin-mining industry (l�reund

1 9 8 1 : 22 2 -3 ) . Throughou t this period , the managerial and research expertise of the South African i n dustry, and of the Chamber of Mines in particular, shaped

mining on the rest of the continent (Crisp 1 9 8 3 ) . The most important of the

Page 10: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

2 5 2 H i s tory, h istoriClJl5 and dmlopment pol icy

interventions of the Sou th Afri can mining corporations v/as clearly the s tr ing of monopsonis t ic con trac ts set up by the De Beers corpora tion with the col onial

governmen ts of Angol a , Congo, Go ld Coa s t , Guine a , Sierra Leone , Tanganyika ,

and � amibia . Again, the key to the success of these agreements was the legal form

of m i n eral ri ghts in the colonies . 'The production from the foreign countries , su c h as Angol a , Con go , and Sierra Leone ' , Ernest Oppenheimer explained [0 the board of the Di amond Producers ' 'lssoci at ion in 1 9 1 4 , ' was complete ly

con trol led by reason of the government concession s given (0 [he companies in

respect of the whole of the terr i tories concerned ' (Gregory 1 9 6 2 : 3 1 9 , 3 2 9 , 3 7 1 -2 ) . D e Beers ' posi t ion as the monopoly wholesaler meant that outsid e of southern Africa i t had little interest in the organi2.J.tion of diam ond produc t ion ,

or i l S developmental costs and benefits (aside from the effort tu curtail illicit diamond m ining and lrading after 1 9 6 0 ) . In m etal mini n g , especially on the

Rhodesian copperbelt , the situation was differen t .

Professions o f the importance o f the ' cause o f na tiona l developmen t ' were ,

in terestingly, often ma tched by Significant infrastructural investments ou ts ide of mi ning in the period between 1 9 4 0 and 1 9 6 0 . By the early 1 9 5 0s , Anglo

Americ<i n had consolidated its con trol of the Zambian copperbel t , which was

p ro dUCin g abou t 1 0 percent of the total glo ba l output in an in d u s try tha t was

dominated by a small number of very large and powerful American corporat ions (Schmitz j 9 8 6 ) . Anglo moved the headquarters of its Central African subSidiary,

primarily to avoid British taxes , to the capi tal of the new Rhodesian Federation .

Sir Ernes t Oppenheimer 's public promise that Anglo would ' take a leading part in assisting the progress of the Rhodesias ' was promp tly ful fi lled by tht: purchase of £5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 of rolling stock ren ted to the state railways and the provision of a

£ 2 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 loan , and a further £ 1 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 power surcharge levied on the mines , for the finanC ing of the Kariba hydro-electric dam (Grcgory 1 9 6 2 :

46 1 -6) .

By the 1 9 4 0 s , mining had become the most important site ( indeed often the

only Site) of (he colonial s tates ' new and concer t e d development effor t . This effort , as Fred Coop�r has shown , was unlike the mainly infras truc tural pro j ec ts

plalmed by the American mining engineers OD the Rand in tlle 1 8 9 0 s ; i t turned

- under the contradictory in fluence of Labour and social Catholic Party officials

in London and Paris , and workers i l l Afri ca and the West Indies - on the p lanned

implementation of welfare benefits aimed at tlle building of modern African

families (Cooper 1 9 9 6 ) . Key to this projecl was the ' s tabilized ' African workforce of the mines and rai lway � , and espeCially (he social l aboratory of the Central African copperbdt . In both [he Congo and the Zambian copperbel t the ini t ial

system ot labour rnigrancy, modeled on the tax and pass regimes of the

Witwatersrand , were abandoned in the 1 9 2 0s for a permanent popula tion of

workers and their families . In the Congo this i nvolved comprehensive , and

invasive , medical interven tions suppor ted by the church and the m ining corpo­

ration , Union Miniere du Ham Katanga (UMHK) , in order to lower infant

Page 11: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

Why modern African economies a re dep�ndeJ1 [ on m i neral resources 2 5 3

mortal i ty (Hunt 1 9 9 9 : 2 5 1 -3 ) . On the Za mbian copperbe l l , the British govern ­

men t 's search for a nev,' kind of urban Afri can family prod uced the Rhodes­

Livi.ngstone Ins t i tute in 1 9 4 0 , on e of the key si tes for the production of social

.�cientific understandings of an emerging Afr ican industrial modernity.

Th e grow i ng militancy and organiza t ion of mine workers in the Bri rish terri ­

tories in the 1 9 40<; rout inely complicated the plans careful ly laid in the colonial

office , and the pressure to defuse workers ' pro tes ts led remorselessly toward s

improved social benefits . Even the anem i c gold min es in Ghana hegan to prOvide

subsidized bULlSilll1 and electri C i ty, improved med i cal care , and a vari ery of sports

and recreation fac i l i t ies under pressure from local offlcia l s (Crisp 1 9 8 4 : 7 2-5) .

This welfarist slant to mining development con t inued apace through th e 1 9 5 Os

(and .vell in to the 1 9 6 0 s) as Cold War- i n flated prices for metal commodities

gave the corporations an d their host govern ments the resources to spend on

increased wages , pensions , hOUSin g , education and entertainment (Freund 1 9 8 1 :

2 1 8 ) . In the coppt' rbel t , govermnent and mining companies funded the

cons truct ion of 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 houses bL:cween 1 9 48 and 1 8 6 4 ; in Eastern Nigeria the

new local milli sters began a program of free , u niversal primary school education

(Berry 1 9 9 3 : 5 5 , Ferguson 1 9 9 9 : b 6 ) . To help fu nd these i n t ervention s , the

Colonial Office at last bought out (at the expense of each colony) th" licensi.ng

revenues of the chartered co mpanies in Southern Rhodesia , NigeriJ. ..:.nd , at the

very last moment, Northern Rhodesia (Freund 1 9 8 J : 2 I 3- j r) .

In the wake of Mau Mau, the Colonial Office began to dwell on the ari th­

me tical implica tions of the social in terventions being promoted in London and

Africa . As the prospects ot sustainin g l ocally administered and lo cal ly funded

welfare interventions darkened , officials began to view self- government as a way

( lut of an increaSingly in tractable mess. ' The people are going to be disillusioned:

the Governor- General of Nigeria wro te in 1 9 5 5 , ' but it is better that they should

be disillusioned as a result of the fail ure of their own people than that they

should be disillusioned as a result of our action s ' (Cooper 1 9 9 6 : 3 9 3 ) . It was not

long before the post- colonial states that inheri ted the ne", expenses of L.tL­

i l 1 iperial welfarism battened on to the resource s , and par ticularly the precious

foreign exchang e , offered by mineral expor ts .

A new era of nationalized mining beg an in J 9 5 9 when Nkrumah bought

ou t six marginal gold mines and set up the State Gold Mining Corporation

(Crisp j 9 8 4 : j 3 3 ) . Towards the end of the decade, Kenneth Kaunda na tionalized

5 1 percen t of the equity of the two corporations , Zambian Anglo American and

Roan Selection Tru s t , on the copperbelt (Ferg uson 7.. 0 0 6 : 1 <) 7 , Libby and Woakes

1 9 8 0 ) . The Zambian president hoped that by vest ing mineral rights in his own

office he wo uld be able to encour age the newly nationalized corporations to

increase investmen ts and expand mining beyond copper. In 1 9 7 3 , Kaunda

announced a program of Zambianization to fill managerial position s , and the

posi tions of key decision makers . wi th nationals . At about thE' same time the

military governments in Ghana and Nigeria bought majority share hold ings in

Page 12: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

2 5 + H istory, h is to r i o ns ond del'elopmen t pol i cy

the few remaining mining companies , and sought to im plement programs of ' i ndi genization ' (Freund 1 9 8 1 : 2 2 4 . Tsikata 1 9 9 7 ) , In most of these cases . the

m in ing corporations seem not [0 have offered any thing by \ovay of s igniftcant

resistan<.::e .

In the Congo. t h e process o f nationalization w a s much more rag ged.

Imm ediately after Bel g ium had hast i ly g ran ted the Congo its independence,

UMHK funded the rluee- year secession of the Shaba copperbpl t rf' gion . earning th e enmity of the otherwise pro- capitalist dictator who seized power in 1 9 6 5 . Mobuto Sese Seko. Mobuto seized UMHK on the first day of 1 9 6 7 , bddly incurring the wrath of the Int�rnat i onal Association for the Protection and Promotion of Private Foreign Investments and a tea m of US diplomats ; two

weeks later he accepted the advice of the US diamond merchan t , Maurice

Tempelsm an . to enter in to negotia tions with the Belgian company about the

terms of nati onalization . What is s triking abou t this period is tha t Mobuto .

despite [he intense international competition in the copper industry, could find

no buyer for the expropri ated assets of the corporation . Faced with the complete

withdrawal ot ' skilled personnel from th(' copperbe L t . rapid depletion of the

countr y 's foreign exchange and a global boyco tt of Congolese copper organized

by the Societe General de Belgique. Mo bu to was forced [Q allow UMHK to

continue operating the mines , s tripped of their property rights in the subter­

ranean copper. I t was only w i th the deve lopment of the Tenke Fungurume (TFM) cobal t and copper mines in 1 9 7 1 that Mobu[Q , and Tempelsman , were a ble to

achieve their a i m of breaking UMHK's stranglehold on the Zairian copperbelt

(Gi bbs 1 9 9 7 ) .

An important , and eaSi ly forgotten , feature of this period of nationalist

economic policy was the massive investment that African governments made in

the effort to create new transport linkages . In Gabon . in 1 9 7 2 . President Bongo

commissioned a 6 5 0km railway line linking Libreville on the coas t with the

mining dis trict at Franceviile on the eastern �ide of the country. Tv,'elve years later

i t was opened . The l ine, wh ich co!',[ the massive SlU11 of $ 4 bill ion and requires

an op era ti ng subSidy of sum 1 6 0 mill iull pel annu m , was bui l t by some of the largest rail contl'actors in Europe ; [0 date i t seems not to have had any measur­

able developmental benefit for non-mining regions i t passes through (Reed

1 9 8 7 ) . On the other side of the con tinent , China proVided an interest-free loan

and the contracto rs to build the Uhuru Railway connectin g Dar-es-Salaam wi th

the copperbel t , allOWing the Zambian mines to export w i thout having to use the

Rl1udesian and South African networks or the war-ravaged Beng uela l ine . Here ,

again , the massive inves tment in infrastruct ure has produced very li ttle develop­

mental resul t . The Tazara line runs through vast tracts of Tanzania that have very

low popula tion densi ti e s , and the railway has strug gled to re lain the expert mechanical staff required to maintain diesel locomotives and the line itself For

many years trains have run in frequently and very slowly (Due 1 9 8 6) . In Ni geria

the federal government spent laVishly on the bui ld ing of all-weather roads in the

Page 13: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

Why modern Afri can econom i es a re dependent on m i ncfCl l resources 2 5 5

middle o f the oi l boom . Road conc;truction w a s famously su bj ect to the special

' 4 0 percen t ' enabling fees tha t became common in Nigeria in this period , bu t the

real probl ems were cost over-runs caused by infla ti on .m d the very large num bers

of n ew vehicles that were imported after [he salary increases of the mid- 1 9 7 0s (Freund 1 9 7 8 ) . Perhaps the most eloquent of tl-lE' infrastructure proj ects of this

p eriod was [he Ingba dam scheme com missioned by Mob uto Sese-Seko to

provide elec t r iC ity to the Shaba copptrbel t mines . The cost of the dam , which was

bui l t by Am erican con t ractors , rose from an in i t ial es t i ma te of $ 26 0 million to

wel l over $ 1 billion even years l ale . And the I , 800km transmission line , w hich

Mobuto sought to use to control the secessionists in Shaba , qUickly fell prey to

c;cavengc:rs looking for sources of high-quality scrap mlCtal . With t11e excep tion of

the Tazara line . these projects were a l l buil t by the leading consu l ting firms in E u rope and America : no on e seems [0 have mentioned that the financial and

managerial hurden of mainta i ning the infrastructure was l ikely to exceed the capacity of the ne,,\' s tates (Youn g and Turner 1 9 84) .

The over tly developmental obj ectives o f the nationaliza tion period were, of

course . no t m e t . Ins tead these continent-wide processes synchronized with the

resurgence of what Bayart has called ' the poli tics of the belly ' ( 1 9 9 3 ) .

Nationali7.ation of the mining companies in Ghana . Nigeri a . Congo and Zamb ia

and the global decline in minin� commodity prices usually (although not

always) resulted in a pfet.. i p i tou:; Jcdine in prod uction ; everywhere i t has

stren g thened the poli tics of the gatekeeper s ta te in the post -colonial period . This

process was double-sided . ' If the state i ntr udes as a g atekeeper for the multi ­

national s ,' Bill Freund observed twenty - fi ve years ago . ' i t does so as well for the

mass of Africans in the humbler pur s u i t of basic goods and services ' ( 1 9 9 8 :

2 4 7 ) . For Bayar t , the l eveling features o f the polities o f the post-colonial S ta te ­

wh ich sees the l i t tle men extracting concessions from the rich and pQ\iverfu} and

one poli tical faction replaced by another withoL\[ any meaningful prospect of

accumulated wealth and power for either - prevent him from viewing the

gatekeeper s tate as an ins trument of explOitation. But he does acknowledge that

the i mpor tance of factional s tr uggles in the period of nationalization underscores

the resurgence of a new kind of merchant capi ta l in Africa , dominated by 'a Bruce

Macken7.ie or a "Tiny " Rowland in EaSlern and Sou thern Africa . or of a Maurice

Tempelsman in Zaire or of a Jamil Said Mohammed in Sierra Leone' (Bayart

1 9 9 3 : 2 1 6) .

The period of nationalization in min ing began to unravel quite rapi dly to'Nard the end of the 1 9 8 0 s . Wi rh en couragement from the World Bank . thiny

African countries had changed their mining codes to al low for the return of

private foreign inves tmen t by 1 9 8 7 (Reno 1 9 9 7 ) . Ghana was amon gs t the fIrst

to begin thi s process of privatizing nationalized mineral assets , leading to the sa le

of s o m e 8 0 percenl of the Slate 's equity i n the Ashanti Goldfield Corporation i n

1 9 9 4 , most of which wen t to Lonrho. In the Congo . Zambia and Tanganyika

private mining com panies have begun to buy hundreds of mining l eases or

Page 14: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

1 S 6 H i story, h i storiilllS and deve/opmem po/ i cy

" ta te-own ed properties . In the process a ne'", k ind minin g developm e n t , heavi ly

i n fluenced by the explosion of investment in off-shore oil dril l ing in Angola ,

Equ i torial Guinea , Gabon and N i ger i a , seems to h e taking shape .

The gold , cobal t and copper mi nes that are cmrently undn development in

cen tral A frica are unique his torically owing tu their enclave charaner. The new

very large gold mines i n western Tanzani a , for example , have almost no i nfra­

stnlctLlfal connection to the rest of the cou n try Th ese mines have built their Own

power g eneration , water supply, housi ng for skilled ex -pa trio ts and airs trips . The catering for the employees on some of th central African mines is arranged \ov1tll companies i l1 Soulh A frica who fly almos t all the mine provisi ons from

Johannesburg. Aside from increased tax revenues (no sma l l m a t ter for many

A frican countries) i t seems unl ike ly that this kind of mining wil l produce any of

the w i der industrial or infrastructural benefits that fol l owed in sou thern Africa in

the fust half of the twentieth cen tury. But what is s trikin g in all of these cases i s

the comparative SimpliCity, a n d certainty, of the mineral rights p urchased by

these n ew mi ning companies , t'ven , as has usually been the case , where hundreds of nationals have been earning a subsis tence income in ar t isanal mi ning. The

model of this n ew form of min ing inves tment seems to be the massive off-shore

oil developments owned and oft,:n operated by rhe thir ty- year-old Angolan oil

paras tata l , Sonangol (de Oli veira 2 0 0 7 , Ferguson 2 0 0 6 : 1 94--2 1 0 ) .

Conclusion

The importance of mineral extraction in twen tieth-century African economies i s , obviously, a product of the relat ive formal weakness of the o ther forms of economic act ivi ty on the continen t . But th e problem is not simply one of relative

econom ic signi ficance ; mining is qual i tatively differen t to the other areas of

economic activ i ty on the conti nent . Mines are important , especially to foreign

investors and A frican states , because i t is very difficu lt to extrac t , and accumulate,

capital i n agricul t ure , trade and industry. I t is difficu l t to resis t the conc lus ion that

mining worked in the twent i eth century througho u l much of Africa because, l ike

e i ghteen th- and nineteenth-century slavery, it was ' the only form of private ,

revenue-producing proper ty in A frican l aw ' (Thornton 1 9 9 2 : 7 4) . Mining worked very well under the poli tical economy of colonial rule. The

labour deman d s of mining syndnonized much better with the politiCS of

indirect rule tha n the special skills of secondary industry or the coercive require­

ments of agricu l ture . Almost all of the continent 's mines raised their initial

work force through the agency of A frican cus tomary a uthorities working a!>

agents of the colonial state (Freund j 9 8 1 : 5 5-7 , 1 3 8 ) . Minin g , espec ially

compounded mining , fed off the gendered character of labour resomces in

African households. At leas t before the 1 9 7 0 s , millions o f African men sought

short - term opportuni t ies to earn cash w ag es in the, often vain , hope of building

a more prosperous rural home. They t raveled very great distances from their own

Page 15: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

Why modern African economies a rr dependen t on mineral resou rces 2 5 7

home districts to cecure the�,c jobs (Gordon 1 9 7 7 , Beinart 1 9 8 2 , Harr ies 1 9 9 4 ,

Moodie 1 9 9 4) .

Mining was also well su i ted to the peculiar transport infras [Tucture of

colonial A frica ; most colonial (and post-colonial) railway l i nes - MUller's market­

oriented trunk lines are the exception here - run from a key regional port to the

source of the mos t valuahle minerals . ' All roads and railways led dovm to the sea ' ,

a:. Rodncy no ted i n 1 9 7 2 . ' They were built to extract gold or manganese or coffee

or cotton. ' The con t inued importance of min i n g , at least unti l the recent period,

reflected the endLU"in g economic effects of that extracti ve transport infras tructure

(Rodney 1 9 8 1 : 2 0 9) . For the gatekeeper s tate, under colon ia l rule and after­

wards , mining w as an irresis t ible source of power and weakness (Cooper 2 0 0 2 : 1 5 6-90 ) .

For over a centur y i t has been the global commodi ty markets that have

pt · riodically clravvn foreign investors to African mineral resource s . That is as tTUe

today as i t ",vas in the 1 8 9 0s . I t is well [0 r(,member, as South Afri ca 's Finance

Minister Trevor Manuel noted in 2 0 0 7 , that rJ1e current mining boom , like the

others before it , is not ' a permanent shift [but] a temporary opportunity '

(Manuel 2 0 0 7 ) . The his tory of the las t centur y of mining in Africa also demon­

s trates iliat the d evelopmental benefits of m ining have declined dramatically over

time. Perhaps it is ri me to apply the lessons of the securi ty, sin1plici ty and [w1gi­

bil i ty of mineral rights to other forms of property, and other industries .

References

Aily, Russel ( 1 9 9 4) . Gold and Empi re :The Bank of Eng land and South Africa's Gold Producers, 1 88 6- 1 9 2 6 , Johannes burg : Wi[watersrand University Press

Bayan , Jean-Francois ( 1 9 9 3 ) . The Sta te in Africa : The Pol i t i cs of the Bel ly , London : Longman

Beinan, WiJ.]jam ( J 9 8 2 ) . Pol i t i ca l tconomy of Pandoland , 1 8 60 to 1 9 3 0 , Johannesburg : Cambridge University Press

Berry, Sara ( 1 9 9 3 ) . No Cond i t ion Is Permanen t : The Soc i al Dynamics of Ag rarian Change in Sub-Saha ran Afric(] , Madison , W1: Universi ty o[ Wisconsin Press

Breckenridge, Keith ( 1 9 9 5 ) . ' ' ' Money wi th dignity " : migrants , minelords and the cultural pol i t ies of the South African gold standard cr isi s , 1 9 2 0-3 3 ' , Jou rnal 01 Mrican His tory

3 6 ( 2 ) : 2 7 1 -3 0 4

Bundy, Colin ( 1 9 8 8) . Rise and Fal l o f the SOll t h Alri can Peasan try , Cape Town : David Phi l ip Chamber of Mines, Witwatersand ( 1 8 9 7 ) . The M ining Indus t ry, Evidence and Repo rt of the Industri a l

Commission o f Enq u iry, wi th an Append i X , Johannesburg Cuopn, Frederick ( 1 996 ) . Decolon iza t ion and Al rican Soc iety: The Labor Quest ion in French alld B ri t ish

Afri c a , Cambridge : Cambridge Univers i t y Press

Cooper, Frederick ( 0 0 2) . Africa since 1 940: The Past of the Presen t , Cam bridg e : Cambridge University Press

Crisp, Jeff ( 1 9 8 3 ) . ' Productivity and protes t : scienti£c managemen r in th e Ghanaian gold mines , 1 947- 1 9 5 6 ' , in Frederick Cooper (ed . ) , St ruggle for the Ci ty : MigroUlt Labor, Cap i to l

and t h e State i n Urban Africa , Beverly Hil l s , CA : Sage Publications CriSp, Jeff ( 1 9 8 4) . Story of an African Working Class: Ghana ian Mi ners ' Slrugglt " 1 8 70- 1 980 , London :

Zed Books

Page 16: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

2 5 8 H istory, h i stor ians and dmlapment pol icy

Curtin , Phi l ip D. ( 1 9 8 4) . Cross-Cu l t u ra l TfIIIlf i n World History , N ew York : Cambridge Un i versity Press

de Olivei ra , Ricardo Soares (2 0 0 7) . ' Bllsines� success , Angola-s tyle : pos lcolonial pol i t ics

and the r ise and rise of Sonangol ' , Journru of Modern Afri can S tud i es 4 5 e ) : 5 9 5 - 6 1 9 Del ius , Pe ter ( 1 9 8 3 ) . Land Belongs to Us : The Ped i Pol i t y, t h e Boers and t he B ri ! i ch i n t h e N i neteen th Cen t u ry

Transvaa l , Johan nesbmg : Ravan Prt";"

Denoon , Donald ( 1 9 7 3 ) . A G rand I l l us i on : The Fa i l ur e of Imper i o l Pol icy in t h e Transl'aa l Colony Du ring the Per iod of Reconst ruct ion , 1 9 0 0- 1 9 05 , London : LonRman

Dubow, Sau l ( 2 0 0 6 ) . A Commonwea l t h o f Knowledge: Sci ence, SenSi b i l i ty, a n d Whi te Sou th A f ri ca , 1 8 2 0-2 000 , New York : Oxford Un ivers i ty Press

Due, Jolm F. ( 1 9 8 6) . ' Trends i n ra i l t ranspor t in Zambia and Tal1Zania ' , Utafi t i 8 (2 ) : 4 3-5 8 El I i s , S tephen anrl Jane t MacGa rfcy ( 1 9 96 ) . ' Researc h on s u b - Sal1dran A fr ica ' s unrecorded

in ternat ional tIdde : s o m t' methodolog i cal and conceplUal problems ' , Afri can S t u d i es Rel' i ew 3 9 (2 ) : 1 9--4 I

Feulstein , C h arles H . ( 2 0 0 5 ) . All EcoDomic History of South Africa : Conqueq , Discri m i n a t i oD , and Developmen t , NfW Yor k : Cambr i d ge Univers i ty Press

Ferg usoll , Jarl lcs ( 1 9 9 9) . Expec ta t i ons of Mudern i ty : Myt hs and Meani ngs of Urban Li fe on t ht' Za mb ian

Copperhe l t , Berkeley, C A : Univers i ty of Cal i fornia Press Ferg uson , Jamf'� ( 2 0 U 6) . Globa l Shadows : Afri ca i n t he Neol i bera l Worl d Order , Durh a m , NC: D u ke

U ni ve rsi t y Pre�s

Frankel . Sally Herbert ( 1 9 6 9 ) . Copi to l I nves tmrn t i n Africa , New York : Howard Fer t ig

Freund, Bil l ( .1 9 7 8 ) . ' O il boom and cris i s i n contempora.ry N iger i a ' , Rev i ew of Afri can Pol i t i ca l Economy 5 ( I 3 ) : ';) I - I 00

Freund , Bill ( 1 9 8 I ) . Cap i ta l and L(l bouf i n Iht Nigerian Ti n M i nes , Atlan tic Highlands : HW11an.i t ies Freund , Bill ( 1 9 9 8 ) . The Making o f Con tempo ra ry Africa : The Deve l opmen t of African Soc iety since 1 8 0 0 ,

Boulder, CO : Lynn Riener Ganard , Timothy F. ( 1 9 8 2 ) . ' M y t h and m e trolog y : the early tran s-SaharaJl gold trad e ' ,

Jou rna l of African H is tory 2 3 (4) : 4+3-6 1 Gibbs , David ( 1 9 9 7 ) . ' International com merc ial r i val ries and the Zai'rian copper nation

al isation of 1 9 6 7 ' , Review of African Pol i t i cal Economy 24 ( 7 2) : 1 7 1 -8 4 Go rdon , Roben ( 1 9 7 7 ) . Mines, Masters and Migrants: Li fe i n a Nami bian Compound , Johann esburg :

Ravan Pres� Gregory, Theodor ( 1 9 6 2 ) . Ernest Oppenhe imer and the Economic Deve lopmen t of Sou t hern Afri ca ,

Oxlord : Ox ford Univers i t y Prfs� Harr i e s , Pat r ick ( 1 9 94) . Work, Cu l t u re and Iden t i ty : M i g ran t Labou rers i n Moza m b i q u e and Sou t h Africa,

c . 1 8 60- 1 9 1 0 , Johannes burg : Wi rwa tersrand UniverSi ty Press Hecht , Gabrie l l e ( 2 0 0 2 ) . ' R upture- ta lk in the nuclear age : conj ugat ing co lonia l power in

A frica ' , Soc ia l Stud ies of Science 3 2 (5-6) : 69 1 - 7 2 7 Herbs t , Jeffrey ( 2 000 ) . Sta tes and Power i n Afri ca : Compara t i ve Lessons i n Au thori ty (Ind Control .

Prin cewl1 , NJ : Princewn Univers i ty Press Hunt , Nancy Rose ( 1 9 9 9 ) . A Colon ia l Lex i con of B i r t h Ritual , Med i ca l i zo t ion , and Mohi l i ty i n t he Congo ,

Durhan1 , NC : Duke- U n i v ersi t y Press Katz , E laine N. ( 1 9 99 ) . ' Revi�i t iT1g the origins of thf indus trial colour bar in the

Witwaters rand gold mining indus try, 1 8 9 1 - 1 8 9 9 ' , Jou rnal of Southern African � tud ies 2 5 ( 1 ) : 7 1 -9 7

Katz , Elaine ( 2 0 0 5 ) . 'The role o f ,\merican mining technology and Ameri can mining engineers in the Wirwatersrand gold minin g industry 1 8 9 0- 1 9 1 0 ' , Sou th African Journal of Econom i c History 2 0 ( 2 ) : 4 8-8 2

Katze n , Leo ( 1 9 6 4) . Gold and th e Sou th Afri can Economy, Cape Town : Bal kema Keega.n , Timothy ( 1 9 9 6) . Colon ia l Sou th Africa and the Origins of t he Rac i a l Order, Cape Town : David

Phi l i p

Page 17: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

IVh)' modern African econom i es a re deprndcl l l on minera l reso u rces 2 5 9

Li bby, Ronal cl and Michael Woakes ( 1 9 8 0 ) . ' N at ionaliZLItion and the d isplacement o f devel ­opme nt pol icy in Zambia ' , African Stud i es ReviCIV 2 3 ( I ) : 3 3-5 0

MarGaffey, Janet ( 1 9 9 1 ) . The Reo I Economy of Za i re: The Con t ri bu t i on of Smuggl ing and Other Unoffi c i a l A c t i v i t i e, t o N(i l i onn l Wea l t h , Phi ladelphi a : U nive rsi ty of Pennsylvania Press

Manuel , Trevor ( 2 0 0 7 ) , The Standard , 23 Septem ber. Avai l able a t vv\vvv thestan dard .co.zw / business/ 1 2 2 2 8 . html ( a cce��ed 3 February 2 0 1 1 )

Marks, Shula and S t mley Trapido ( 1 9 7 9) , ' Lord Milner and the South African s tate ' , Hisror;

Workshop Jou l nal 8 ( 1 ) : 5 0-8 0 McCask ie , Tom C. ( 1 9 8 3 ) . 'Accumulat ion , wealth and be l i ef i n A �ant e history. I . To the cl osl

of the ninetee11lh cenl u ry ' , Afric(I : Jou rnal of the I n ternll t i ona l A f ri can Inst i t u t e 5 3 ( I ) : 2 3-79 Mood ie, T Dunbar ( 1 9 94) . Going fo r Gold : Men, Mi nes an d Migra t ion , Berkeley, CA : Un ivers i t y of

California Press Reed , \1ichael C. ( 1 9 8 7 ) . ' Gabon : a neo-co l o n i a l enc lave of enduring French in teres t ' ,

Jou rna l of Modern Afr ican S lud ies 2 5 ( 2 ) : 2 8 3-3 2 0 Reno, Wi l l iam ( 1 9 9 7 ) . 'AfricaJ1 weak s t a tes an d com mercial a Uiances ' , African Affa irs 9 6

( 3 8 3 ) : 1 6 5- 1 8 6 Rickard , Thomas A . ( 1 9 2 2 ) . I n terviews wi r h M i n i ng Enu ince rs , San Francisco Rodney, Waiter ( 1 9 8 I ) . HolI' Eu rope Underdel'el opeu Africa , WasruJ1 g to n , DC: Howard Universit }!

Press Schmitz, Chris lopher ( 1 9 8 6 ) . 'The rise o f b ig business in the worl d copper industry ' ,

Econom ic History Rev i ew 3 9 ( 3 ) : 3 9 2-4 1 0 SIiJ1J1 , Pete r ( 1 9 7 I ) . ' Commercial concessiune; and pul i tics d uring lhe col o n i a l period : the

role of the British South Afr ica Company in Xorthern Rhodesia , 1 8 9 0- 1 9 6 4 ' , African

Affa i rs 7 0 ( 2 8 1 ) : 3 6 5-84 Smalberger, John M . ( 1 9 7 6 ) . 'The roh: u r the u iawund · mining industry in lhe develop­

ment of th e pass-law system in Sou th A frica ' , I n ternat iona l Journal of African Historical Stu d i es 9 (3 ) : 4 1 9-3 4

Thornton , Jolm K. ( 1 9 9 2 ) . Afri ca and Afri mos i n the Making of the Atlan t i c World, 1 400- 1 6 8 0 ,

Can1 bridge: Cambridge Univers ity Press

Tsikata , Fill S . ( 1 9 9 7 ) . 'The vicissit udes of minera l pol i cy in Ghana ' , Resou rces Pol icy 2 3 ( 1 -2) : 9- 1+

Turre l l , Robert ( 1 9 8 7 ) . 'Kim berley : labour and compounds, 1 8 7 1 - 1 8 8 8 ' , ill Shula Marks and Ri chard Rath bone (eds) Ind ust ri a l i sa t i on and Soc ia l Change : African Clus, Format ion , Culture and Consciousness 1 8 7 0- 1 93 0 , London : Longman , pp. 45 -69

Tu rrell , Ro bert and Jean-Jacques Van Helten ( 1 9 8 6) . ' The Rothschild5 , the E"ploration Company and minill g finance ' , Business History 2 8 (2 ) : 1 8 1 -2 0 5

U NCTAD ( 200 7 ) . ' World lnvestment Repor t : Transnational Corporations , Extrac tive

Industri es and Developmen t ' , New York and G eneva : UNCTAD. Vai l , Leroy ( 1 9 7 6) . 'Mozambique's chartered compa.nies : the rule of the feeble ' , Jou rna l o f

Mri can Hisrory 1 7 ( 3 ) : 3 8 9-4 1 6 Webb, A , C. M . ( 1 9 8 I ) . 'Witwatcrsrand Genesis : A Comparative Study of Some Ear ly Gol d

Min ing Companies , 1 8 8 6- 1 9 I 4 ' , Doctorate, Rhodes Universi ty Wickin s , Peter ( 1 9 8 6) . Afri m : An Econom i c History, 1 8 8 0- 1 9 8 0 , Oxford : Ox ford Univers i t y

Press

Wilks , Ivor ( 1 9 7 7 ) . 'Land , labour, capital and the fores t kingdom of Asantc : a model of ear ly change ' , in Jonathan Fri edman and M .J . Rowlands (eds) Evol u t i on of Soc i a l Systems , Pittsburgh, PA : Pittsburgh Univers i ty Press , pp. 48 7-5 2 9

Worger, William H . ( 1 9 8 1 ) . Sou th Africa 's Ci ty o f Diamonds: Mine Workers and Monopoly Cap i ta l ism i n

Ki mberley, 1 8 6 7- 1 895 , Ne\v Haven , CT: Yale Universi t y Press World Bank (2 0 0 7 ) . ' World Bank assistaJ1ce to ag ricu l ture in sub- Sahara.n Africa : an lEG

review ' , Independen t Evaluation Grol lP, Washin g ton , DC : World Bank

Page 18: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

2 6 0 H istory. h istorians and development po l i tl'

Worsfold . W Basil ( 1 9 1 3 ) , The Recons t ruc t i on of [he New Colon i e� under Lord Mimer. by W Basi l Worsfold . Vol . 2 . London

Young . Crawford ( 1 994) , The AfricQJ1 Colon i a l Stale in Compa ra t ive Perspec t i ve, New Haven . CT: Yale University Prr'ss

Young , Craw ford and Thomas Turner ( 1 9 8 4) , The Rise and Fa l l of the Zar ian Scale . Madison . WI : Univl:rs i t, of Wiscon sin Press

Yudelman , David ( 1 9 8 3 ) , The Emergence of Modern Sou th Arri c u : Stale , Capi t al . QJld lhe I n corpora t ion of Organ iad Labour on We Soulh AfricQJ1 Gold F ie lds . 1 902-3 9 . Cape Town : David Phil ip

Notes

I Often referred lO by i ts Dutch acronym . VOC (Vereenigde Oostindische Com pagnie) ,

Page 19: 10 Special rights in property: why modern African

COMMENTARY

Natural resources and development:

which histories matter?

Mick Maare

This volume is anima ted by a con cern that his tory be taken properly imo aCc01mt

in the design of development policy. Paul Warde 's chapter on the history of energy and natural resource use i n Europe reverses the lens . Scholars have only recently coined the term ' resource curse ' , and understood the extent to which , in poorer countries over the past few decades , large-scale exploitat ion of natural resources has had lf1align economic and po l i tica l consequences . Warde tell us that this new understanding is a lready changing the ways in which economic histo­rians interpret the past :

To an earl ier generation o f economic his toria n s , i t ,vas sel f-evident that mudefD g rowth was predica ted on favourable resource endowments and the technology to exploi t them. The precocious English use of coal and development of associaled lec hnology such a s the steam t:ngine represented the exemplary case. Yet more recen t developments have shaken that belie f. It h a s been a striking characteristic o f recent economic deve lopment and the in ternat ional di vision of labour tha t economies

heavi l y dependent on n a t ural resource exploitation and export suffered from

sluggish economic growth . One can speak now of a 'resource curse ' . Hence relat ive

natural resource abundance may now be viewed as det rimental to development . while relative scarci ty may actual ly prompt bene flts throu g h ' i nd uced innovatio n '

and substi tu t ion to l ess resource-dependent activi t ies . (Warde, this vohU11e , p . 2 2 1 )

But how far does the experience of poorer countries in recent decades j ustify

a general re-eval uation of - and scep t icism about - the benefits of natural

resource exploi tation ? The ' resource curse ' is ne i ther natural nor inevi table. It is rather the contingen t outcome of a set of economic and po l i tica l conditions that happen to have afflicted many poorer countries particularly imensely over recem

decades , espeCially the per iod since around 1 9 7 0 . These conditions include in

particular : (a) very high international income inequality be tween most (riLh) resource import ing nation s and most (poor) resource exporting nation s ; (b) thc