100 into 2 wont go

21
Whilst we wait to start please visit http://www.netvibes.com/icjsrssfeeds#General Please look at the reading lists appearing in the left hand column. I would ask you to write any comments on Appearance, structure, size, annotation with an indication of subject of the list on a post it note which you can post to the flip chart at the front.

Upload: iancorns

Post on 04-Jul-2015

264 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

These slides were presented in July 2010, to academics in the Law and Criminology dept. Taking a quiz-style format, they introduce academics to the challenges of resource provision around lists as a pre-cursor to presenting Talis Aspire.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 100 into 2 wont go

Whilst we wait to start please visit

http://www.netvibes.com/icjsrssfeeds#General

Please look at the reading lists appearing in the left hand column.

I would ask you to write any comments on

Appearance, structure, size, annotation with an indication of subject of the list

on a post it note which you can post to the flip chart at the front.

Page 2: 100 into 2 wont go

100 into 2 won’t go

Page 3: 100 into 2 wont go

Problems of access OR can

we hope to satisfy student

demand for access to books?

Teaching with a set text

Page 4: 100 into 2 wont go

a) 15

b) 25

c) 45

What do you think is the maximum number of students that one copy of a 7 day loan textbook could reach in one

semester?

Page 5: 100 into 2 wont go

How many students is one 7-day loan

textbook likely to service in a semester?

Based on

assignment on topic covered by textbook due at end of week 10

students not aware of reading list till day 5 of semester

students willing to read the book in an early week of semester and make any notes needed in that week, with no further access except perhaps to a 1 day or 4 hour loan copy …

Page 6: 100 into 2 wont go

Best case scenario

• Day 5 book issued to student 1

• Day 12 due back (Student 2 reserves in this first week) Book is returned on time

• Day 13 reservation staff deal with book and place note on catalogue

• Email to Student 2 generated overnight

• Day 14 Student 2 receives email and collects book

• Day 21 Student 2 returns book

• Day 22 staff deal with reservation

• Day 23 Student 3 collects book

• Day 30 student 3 returns book

And so on until

Day 68 Student 8 picks up book

Page 7: 100 into 2 wont go

Worst case scenario• Day 5 book issued to

student 1

• Day 12 due back (Student 2 reserves in this first week) Book is returned on time

• Day 13 reservation staff deal with book and place note on catalogue

• Email to Student 2 generated overnight

• Day 14 Student 2 receives email but collects book on last possible day – Day 21

• Day 28 Student 2 brings back book

• Day 29 staff deal with book

• Day 37 – Student 3 picks

up book on last possible

day

• Day 44 Student 3 returns

book

• Day 45 staff deal with book

• Day 53 –Student 4 does not

pick up book until last

possible day

• Day 60 Student 4 returns

book

• Day 61 Staff deal with book

• Day 69 Student 5 picks up

book on last possible day

Page 8: 100 into 2 wont go

Seems unlikely?

• What about part-time students who only attend once a week?

• What about when the due date is a Friday? –in practice with a skeleton staff at weekends, the reservation will not be dealt with until Monday

• What about students who do not return the book on the due date? Many seem willing to regard a fine as a rental payment

• In practice greatest demand for books 2-3 weeks before assignment due date

Page 9: 100 into 2 wont go

Collection development

Planned or happenstance?

Reactive or proactive

Print/electronic balance

Page 10: 100 into 2 wont go

For a book order categorised as “non-urgent “ how long do you think it normally takes from ordering for the book to

reach the library shelves?

a) 20 working days

b) 50 working days

c) 70 working days

Page 11: 100 into 2 wont go

• 2nd

• 8th

• 15th

Where do you think Portsmouth students come in a league table of

Ebrary users?

Page 12: 100 into 2 wont go

Ebrary Usage Stats

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8 Oct-

Dec 08

Sessions

Docs Viewed

38,485 books available to UoP Cost per user session=16p

Total pages viewed was 1,700,002 in 2007/08

15,221 pages viewed on 8 December 2008 alone

Page 13: 100 into 2 wont go

Ebrary Use within UoP 2007/08

55%

16%

14%

11%4%

HSS

Tech

PBS

Sci

CCI

Page 14: 100 into 2 wont go

• Print

• Electronic

• Print & Electronic combined

Which do you think is the cheaper format for an institutional subscription

to a typical journal?

Page 15: 100 into 2 wont go

2009 prices for Human Relations

Jan

‘09

Print Only ElectronicOnly 1999-

Electronic OnlyComplete BackFile

Print and Electronic Access 1999-

Print andElectronicComplete BackFile

$1880 $1918 $2110 $1726 $1918

£1293 £1319 £1451 £1187 £1319

£964 £984 £1082 £885 £984

Jan

‘08

Page 16: 100 into 2 wont go

Print Only ElectronicOnly 1999-

Electronic OnlyComplete BackFile

Print and Electronic Access 1999-

Print andElectronicComplete BackFile

$1880 $1918 $2110 $1726 $1918

£1293 £1319 £1451 £1187 £1319

But, there is VAT to pay on electronic subscriptions

£1395

17.5% VAT 17.5% VAT

£1550

VATVAT

proportion varies based on publishers calculation

Page 17: 100 into 2 wont go

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2001/2 2002/3 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8 2008/9 2009/10

Print Journal A

E-Journal A

Print Journal B

E-journal B

But watch the trend!

Sample e and print journal usage over 9 years

Page 18: 100 into 2 wont go

a) Yes

b) No

Do you think we should be buying more e-only books even for campus

based courses?

Page 19: 100 into 2 wont go

a) Yes

b) No

Do you think we should move towards buying e-only journals?

Page 20: 100 into 2 wont go

a) Yes

b) No

If we have a stable archive of e-journals such as JSTOR, do you think

we should remove the equivalent print journals and re-use the space?

Page 21: 100 into 2 wont go

References

S. Bartlett. Resource list management: a system based approach. Library and Information. Library & Information Update June 2010.

J. Chelin, M.McEachran, & E. Williams. 500 into 4 won’t go how to solve the problem of reading list expectations. SCONUL Focus 36 Winter 2002

A. J. Head and M. B. Eisenberg. Lessons Learned: how college students seek information in the digital age. 2009 (http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2009_Year1Report_12_2009.pdf).

H. Jones. Reading Lists in Cambridge: a standard system? Arcadia Project, 2009

(http://arcadiaproject.lib.cam.ac.uk/docs/readinglist_Report.pdf).

Publihers Association. Open books: open minds. P.A. 2006.(http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2009_Year1Report_12_2009.pdf).

J. Stamenkovic. Has the core text had its day? University of Portsmouth Briefing Paper. 2006.