1027343[1] group decision making

Upload: richabigghe

Post on 06-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    1/21

    PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie CookPowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook

    The University of West AlabamaThe University of West Alabama

    ManagerialManagerialDecision MakingDecision Making

    Adapted byAdapted by

    Dr. Ajay Kr. SinghDr. Ajay Kr. Singh

    ChapterChapter

    66

    Part 2 Planning Challenges in the 21st CenturyPart 2 Planning Challenges in the 21st Century 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved. 2007 Thomson/South-Western. All rights reserved.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    2/21

    62

    Sources of Organizational andSources of Org

    anizational and

    Entrepreneurial DecisionsEntrep

    reneurial Decisions

    Decision makingDecision making The process through which managers and leadersThe process through which managers and leaders

    identify and resolve problems and capitalize onidentify and resolve problems and capitalize on

    opportunities.opportunities. ProblemProblemA condition that occurs when some aspect ofA condition that occurs when some aspect of

    organizational performance is less than desirable.organizational performance is less than desirable.

    OpportunityOpportunityAny situation that has the potential to provideAny situation that has the potential to provide

    additional beneficial outcomes.additional beneficial outcomes.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    3/21

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    4/21

    . 64

    Figure 6.Figure 6.33 Two Contrasting Decision ModelsTwo Contrasting Decision Models

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    5/21

    65

    Ethics and Decision MakingEthics and Decision Making

    Ethical DilemmaEthical Dilemma A situation in which a person must decide whether or not to doA situation in which a person must decide whether or not to do

    something that, although benefiting oneself or the organization,something that, although benefiting oneself or the organization,

    may be considered unethical and perhaps illegal.may be considered unethical and perhaps illegal. Have you accurately assessed the problem?Have you accurately assessed the problem?

    Do you have all the necessary information?Do you have all the necessary information? Where are your loyalties?Where are your loyalties?

    Have you generated a list of possible alternatives and consideredHave you generated a list of possible alternatives and considered

    how each will affect the other parties involved?how each will affect the other parties involved?

    Have you tested each alternative by asking whether it is legal, fair,Have you tested each alternative by asking whether it is legal, fair,

    and just to all parties involved?and just to all parties involved? Would your decision change if you were to disclose it to your family,Would your decision change if you were to disclose it to your family,

    your boss, or society as a whole?your boss, or society as a whole?

    Does your decision have any symbolic potential?Does your decision have any symbolic potential?

    Could it be misunderstood?Could it be misunderstood?

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    6/21

    66

    Behavioral Decision ModelBehavioral Decision Model

    Acknowledges the human limitations that makeAcknowledges the human limitations that makerational decisions difficult to achieve.rational decisions difficult to achieve.A managers cognitive ability to process information isA managers cognitive ability to process information is

    limited.limited.

    Managers usually attempt to behave rationally withinManagers usually attempt to behave rationally withintheir limited perception of a situation.their limited perception of a situation.

    The complexity of most organizational situations forcesThe complexity of most organizational situations forces

    managers to view problems within sharply restrictedmanagers to view problems within sharply restricted

    bounds.bounds. The behavior of managers can be considered rational,The behavior of managers can be considered rational,

    but only in terms of their simplified view of the problem.but only in terms of their simplified view of the problem.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    7/21. 67

    Concepts Important to the BehavioralConcepts Important to the Behavioral

    Decision ModelDecision Model

    Bounded RationalityBounded Rationality Recognizes that people are limited by organizationalRecognizes that people are limited by organizational

    constraints such as time, information, resources, andconstraints such as time, information, resources, and

    their own mental capabilities.their own mental capabilities. IntuitionIntuitionAn unconscious analysis based on past experience.An unconscious analysis based on past experience.

    SatisficingSatisficing The search and acceptance of something that isThe search and acceptance of something that is

    satisfactory rather than perfect or optimal.satisfactory rather than perfect or optimal.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    8/21

    68

    Concepts Important to the Decision ModelConcepts Important to the Decision Model

    (contd)(contd)

    Escalation of CommitmentEscalation of Commitment The tendency to increase commitment to a previouslyThe tendency to increase commitment to a previously

    selected course of action beyond the level that wouldselected course of action beyond the level that would

    be expected if the manager followed an effectivebe expected if the manager followed an effectivedecision-making process.decision-making process.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    9/21

    69

    Fostering Quality in the Decision-MakingFostering Quality in the Decision-Making

    ProcessProcess

    VigilanceVigilance Being concerned for and attentive toBeing concerned for and attentive to

    the correct decision-makingthe correct decision-making

    procedures can make a goodprocedures can make a gooddecision more likely.decision more likely.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    10/21

    . 610

    Group Considerations in Decision MakingGroup Considerations in Decision Making

    Group decision making is becoming moreGroup decision making is becoming morecommon as organizations focus on improvingcommon as organizations focus on improving

    customer service and push decision making tocustomer service and push decision making to

    lower levels.lower levels.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    11/21

    . 611

    Participative ModelsParticipative Models

    Vroom and Yetton ModelVroom and Yetton Model Helps managers determine when group decisionHelps managers determine when group decision

    making is appropriate.making is appropriate.

    Postulates that there are five decision-making stylesPostulates that there are five decision-making styles

    arranged along a continuum.arranged along a continuum.The decision methods become progressively moreThe decision methods become progressively more

    participative as one moves from the highlyparticipative as one moves from the highly

    autocratic style (AI) to the group style (GII), whereautocratic style (AI) to the group style (GII), where

    the manager allows the group to decide.the manager allows the group to decide.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    12/21

    . 612

    Situational Contingencies Affecting DecisionSituational Contingencies Affecting Decision

    Making ParticipationMaking Participation

    Decision significanceDecision significance

    Importance of commitmentImportance of commitment

    Leader expertiseLeader expertise Likelihood of commitmentLikelihood of commitment

    Team supportTeam support

    Team expertiseTeam expertise Team competenceTeam competence

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    13/21

    613

    Participative Models (contd)Participative Models (contd)

    Vroom and Jago ModelVroom and Jago Model The nature of the decision itself determines theThe nature of the decision itself determines the

    appropriate degree of participationappropriate degree of participationdiagnosticdiagnostic

    questions help managers select the appropriate level.questions help managers select the appropriate level.

    A participative decision style is desirable when:A participative decision style is desirable when: Subordinates have useful information and share theSubordinates have useful information and share the

    organizations goals.organizations goals.

    Subordinates commitment to the decision is essential.Subordinates commitment to the decision is essential.

    Timeliness is not crucial.Timeliness is not crucial.

    Conflict is unlikely.Conflict is unlikely.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    14/21

    614

    What is Groupthink?What is Groupthink?

    An agreement-at-any-cost mentality that resultsAn agreement-at-any-cost mentality that resultsin ineffective group decision making.in ineffective group decision making.

    Characteristics of GroupthinkCharacteristics of Groupthink

    Illusions of invulnerabilityIllusions of invulnerability

    Collective rationalizationCollective rationalization

    Belief in the morality of group decisionsBelief in the morality of group decisions

    Self-censorshipSelf-censorship Illusion of unanimity in decision makingIllusion of unanimity in decision making

    Pressure on members who express argumentsPressure on members who express arguments

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    15/21

    Group Decision Making

    StrengthsMore complete

    information

    Increased diversity of

    viewsHigher quality of

    decisions

    Increased acceptance

    of solutions

    WeaknessesMore time consuming

    Increased pressure to

    conform

    Domination by one or afew members

    Ambiguous

    responsibility

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    16/21

    616

    Techniques for Quality in Group DecisionTechniques for Quality in Group Decision

    MakingMaking

    BrainstormingBrainstorming

    Nominal Group TechniqueNominal Group Technique

    Delphi TechniqueDelphi Technique

    Devils Advocacy ApproachDevils Advocacy Approach

    Dialectical InquiryDialectical Inquiry

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    17/21.617

    BrainstormingBrainstorming

    BrainstormingBrainstormingA technique to enhance creativity by encouragingA technique to enhance creativity by encouraging

    group members to generate as many novel ideas asgroup members to generate as many novel ideas as

    possible on a given topic without evaluating them.possible on a given topic without evaluating them.

    Rules of BrainstormingRules of Brainstorming Freewheeling is encouraged.Freewheeling is encouraged.

    Ideas are not criticized as they are being generated.Ideas are not criticized as they are being generated.

    Quality is encouraged.Quality is encouraged.

    The wilder the ideas, the better.The wilder the ideas, the better.

    Piggyback on previously stated ideas.Piggyback on previously stated ideas.

    Ideas are evaluated after alternatives are generated.Ideas are evaluated after alternatives are generated.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    18/21

    618

    Other Decision-Making TechniquesOther Decision-Making Techniques

    Nominal Group Technique (NGT)Nominal Group Technique (NGT)A structured process designed to stimulate creativeA structured process designed to stimulate creative

    group decision making where agreement is lacking orgroup decision making where agreement is lacking or

    the members have incomplete knowledge concerningthe members have incomplete knowledge concerning

    the nature of the problem.the nature of the problem. Delphi TechniqueDelphi Technique Uses experts to make predictions and forecasts aboutUses experts to make predictions and forecasts about

    future events without meeting face-to-face.future events without meeting face-to-face.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    19/21

    Delphi Technique

    The Delphi technique was developed at the RANDcorporation in 1948 to gain expert consensus without

    introducing the adverse side effects of group meetings.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    20/21

    620

    Other Decision-Making TechniquesOther Decision-Making Techniques (contd)(contd)

    Devils AdvocacyDevils AdvocacyAn individual or subgroup appointed to critique aAn individual or subgroup appointed to critique a

    proposed course of action and identify problems toproposed course of action and identify problems to

    consider before the decision is final.consider before the decision is final.

    Dialectical InquiryDialectical InquiryApproaches a decision from two opposite points andApproaches a decision from two opposite points and

    structures a debate between conflicting views.structures a debate between conflicting views.

  • 8/3/2019 1027343[1] Group Decision Making

    21/21

    621

    Classifying Decision SituationsClassifying Decision Situations

    Programmed decisionProgrammed decisionA decision made in response to a situation that isA decision made in response to a situation that is

    routine or recurring.routine or recurring.

    Example: starting your automobileExample: starting your automobile

    Nonprogrammed decisionNonprogrammed decisionA decision made in response to a situation that isA decision made in response to a situation that is

    unique, unstructured, or poorly defined.unique, unstructured, or poorly defined.

    Example: deciding to get a tattooExample: deciding to get a tattoo