10gepon burst receiver simulation - ieee 802 · 2008-01-24 · 10gepon burst receiver simulation...

28
P M C - S I E R R A 1 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008 10GEPON Burst Receiver Simulation IEEE 802.3av January 2008 Haim Ben-Amram Portland, Oregon

Upload: dangquynh

Post on 01-Dec-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

P M C - S I E R R A

1 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

10GEPON Burst ReceiverSimulation

IEEE 802.3avJanuary 2008

Haim Ben-AmramPortland, Oregon

P M C - S I E R R A

2 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Outline

The LIA Model- AC Coupled- DC Coupled

ResultsConclusions

P M C - S I E R R A

3 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

10GEPON AC Coupled

P M C - S I E R R A

4 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

10G LIA – Transfer Function

A 10G AC coupled LIA has been simulated by the following Transfer FunctionThe lower cut-off pole (f1) determines the CID length, while the higher cut-off pole (f2) determines the Bandwidth For the lower frequency pole set to be 3MHzFor the higher frequency pole set to be 7GHz

3dB

f1 =3MHz f2 =7GHz

1

1 2

2 1( )1 1

2 2

s

fH s

s s

f f

π

π π

=+ +

i

P M C - S I E R R A

5 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Considerations in choosing the frequency poles

The higher frequency determines the Bandwidth of the LIA- Therefore the higher frequency pole set to be 7GHz as it should be 0.7B, where B =

10Gbps The lower frequency determines the CID length and how much DC droop from the baseline is allowed

- The lower frequency set to be 3MHz to support 64 bits of CID and maximum 6% DC droop

If the lower frequency cut-off will be too low than the optimum level, it will cause Jitter due to Flicker Noise If it will be too high then it will cause too large DC droop

P M C - S I E R R A

6 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Considerations in choosing the Coupling Capacitor

In AC Coupled applications with long CID the coupling capacitor generates Pattern Dependent JitterIn order to minimize this Jitter, the low frequency cut-off should be optimal as possibleIn one hand, the low frequency cut-off must be as close to DC as possible to avoid baseline DC droop and ISI (which close the EyeDiagram Vertically). In other hand, if the low frequency cut-off will be too low than the optimum it cause to long preamble

P M C - S I E R R A

7 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Coupling Capacitor – Calculation

6%

6100

6 (1 )100 2

61001

2

0.88ln 0.88

0.127.8

P P

P P

tP P

P P

t P P

P P

t

V V

V V

VV

V

V

tt

t

e

e

e

τ

τ

τ

ττ

τ

−−

− −

∆ =

∆ =

= −

= −

=

= −==

7.8

CID

CID

t T

RCT

CR

N

=

=

=

P M C - S I E R R A

8 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

LIA with CID

64 bits of CID have been generated through the Transfer Function

CID

DC droop from the baseline

Preamble PRBS

P M C - S I E R R A

9 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

LIA – Conclusion

We have found, by the simulation, that 3MHz as a low frequency cut-off is the optimum value to maintain CID of 64 bitsThis low frequency cut-off has about 2500bits(250ns) preamble length

20dB Dynamic Range

250ns

P M C - S I E R R A

10 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

10GEPON DC Coupled

P M C - S I E R R A

11 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

10G LIA – DC Coupled

In DC Coupled the τ (RC) determined by internal 2 CapacitorsOne capacitor for “fast” acquisition, during preamble, and the second for CID supportDuring Preamble, the threshold acquisition done by “Middle”frequency cut-off pole Once the threshold acquired then it switch to “low” frequency cut-off pole to support CID

P M C - S I E R R A

12 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

AKWS

WSS

WSAS

VV

HL

L

in

out

+⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛+⎟⎟

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛+

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛+

=11

1

A: forward gain.K: feedback gain.WL: low pass frequency pole (in feedback loop).WH: high pass frequency pole (in forward path).

Transfer Function

f1 and f2 determine how much DC droop from the baseline is allowed and to maintain 64bits CIDDuring preamble the f1_high is active then after a “short”time f1_low becomes an active to support CID

3dB

f1_low = 3MHz f1_high = 80MHz

P M C - S I E R R A

13 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Transfer Function response

2 Burst packets (weak and high) have been transmitted though the 2 poles Transfer Function (Red and Blue)The Red model has a low frequency cut-off in 3MHz, which is very good for CID but has long preambleThe Blue model has a low frequency cut-off in 80MHz, which is good for short preamble but bad for CID

DC Coupled is mixed between the 2 Transfer Function models

P M C - S I E R R A

14 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Simulation – Start of High Burst

P M C - S I E R R A

15 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Simulation – CID

P M C - S I E R R A

16 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Simulation – End of High Burst

f2=50MHz f1=10MHz

P M C - S I E R R A

17 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Preamble Length

Preamble is stable after 5ns!

P M C - S I E R R A

18 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

CID

DC Droop

P M C - S I E R R A

19 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Guard Time

High Burst

CID Pole – End of Burst Preamble Pole – End of Burst

Weak Burst

P M C - S I E R R A

20 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Dynamic Range – 20dB

P M C - S I E R R A

21 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Conclusion – Preamble Length

LIAWe have assumed 6% DC droop from the baselineIn AC coupled the preamble length is:

- 2600bits

In DC coupled the preamble length is:- 50bits

P M C - S I E R R A

22 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Conclusion

DC coupled method is the preferable choice over AC Coupled A dedicated TIA for Dual Rate Burst Receiver is neededToo tight preamble length is not needed (don’t like to be 2nd GPON)The recommended preamble length is following:

Laser “ON”

Off-the-Shelf TIA LIA CDR

2700bits

AC Coupled

DC Coupled Dedicated Burst TIA LIA

270bits

CDRLaser “ON”

P M C - S I E R R A

23 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Back up

P M C - S I E R R A

24 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

V0

Vp-p /2

-Vp-p /2

CID “1”

V06%

Vmax

1t

e τ−

When consecutive “1” bits pass through AC coupled optical receiver, it behaves like

1t

e τ−

Where:t = CID length τ = RC

When t ∞ the function equals to 1 t 0 the function equals to 0

P M C - S I E R R A

25 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

An Example:Assumptions:Vp-p = 400mV∆V [k] = 6%t = 5.2τ

Eq 1

Eq 2

Eq 1 + Eq 2

CIDt TN=

For :k=6%NPreamble = 2600 bits

(1 )100 2

(1 )100 2

1001

2

ln(1 )50

tp p

p p

tp p

p p

t p p

p p

k VV V

k VV

kV

V

kt

e

e

e

τ

τ

τ

τ

−−

−−

− −

∆ = = −

= −

= −

= − −

ln(1 )50CID

kTN τ= − −

ln(1 )50

CIDTk

Nτ−

=−

5.2

5.2*

ln(1 )50

PREAMBLE

CIDPREAMBLE

T

Nk

N

N

τ=

−=

P M C - S I E R R A

26 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

0.5Vptp_max

10%Vptp_min

Assuming that we are allowed 10% droop from the baseline

tpreamble_min

exp(-t/τ) =

Vptp_max = 400mvVptp_min = 10mv

exp(-t/τ) * 0.5Vptp_max < 0.1Vptp_min

exp(-t/τ) * 200 = 1

exp(-t/τ) = 1/200

t = -τ * ln(1/200)

t = 5.2τ

1 t 0

0 t ∞

P M C - S I E R R A

27 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

A Formula – Preamble(CID)

Assuming that 5 time constants is needed

CID

preamble

X

NN

Where:

= Number of CID

= Required Preamble length [bits]= Deviation of baseline permitted during CID

An example: CID = 64X = 0.1 (10%)

N = -5 * 64 ln(1 - 0.1) = 2430bits

N = -5 * 64 ln(1 - 0.06) = 5170bits

For 6% droop

5ln(1 )

cidpreamble

NNX

− ⋅=

P M C - S I E R R A

28 IEEE 802.3av Portland, Oregon January 2008

Straw poll #2

Do we maintain the sensitivity of the 1G OLT receiver (PX10 and PX20) ?Yes: _29_No: _0_No opinion: _2_