1.1 the process of scienceclinebio.weebly.com/uploads/8/5/9/9/85995914/conptt_sci_method.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
1.1 The Process of Science
Six Criteria of (good) Science :
Consistent,
Observable,
Natural,
Predictable,
Testable,
Tentative.
"CONPTT"
Consistency : results stay the same when
an experiment is repeated
Yes:
No:
Consistency : results stay reasonably the
same when an experiment/observations
are repeated
Yes: Green plants will grow towards a light
source.
No: Walking under a ladder will cause bad luck.
Observability : The event or evidence of the
event, can be observed and explained.
Yes:
No:
Observability : The event or evidence of the
event, can be observed and explained.
Yes: Some plants can eat meat.
No: Aliens have visited Earth.
Natural : A natural cause must be used
to explain why or how the event
happens.
Yes:
No:
Natural : A natural cause must be used
to explain why or how the event
happens.
Yes: Green plants convert sunlight into
energy.
No: Moses divided the red sea with a rod.
Predictability : Specific predictions can
be used to make foretell an event.
Yes:
No:
Predictability : Specific predictions can
be used to make foretell an event.
Yes: Students who attend class do better than
students who do not attend class
No: If you are a "Scorpio", your horoscope for
today is "You'll be saying 'I feel rich !”
Testability : the event must be testable
through the processes of science, and
controlled experimentation.
Yes:
No:
Testability : the event must be testable
through the processes of science, and
controlled experimentation.
Yes: Red apples have more sugar than green
apples.
No: Frederico’s is better than Filiberto’s.
Tentativeness : Scientific theories can be
changed or corrected
Yes:
No:
Tentativeness : Scientific theories can be
changed or corrected
Yes: We used to think the earth is flat. We now think it is a sphere.
No: We know that the world began about 6000 years ago, and nothing will change that.
Scientific Method
• What is it?
– An objective and logical process by which
we ask questions and find answers
• Why do we need it?
– To promote open and honest exchange of
data with others; to share what we learn
Steps to the Scientific Method:
Step 1: Observe, wonder and ask
questions about HOW, WHAT,
and WHY phenomena happen in
nature.
- Use your senses to take in new
information and ask questions
- Draw information from previous
experience; consider what you
already know!
Step 2 : Formulate a hypothesis
- A hypothesis is an educated
prediction about a testable question.
Format: If + Independent variable,
then + dependent variable.
• Example: IF we increase the
temperature of the water, THEN
the breathing rate of the fish will
decrease.
- There are two types of variables (parts
of the experiment that change):– Independent Variable: variable that is changed by the
scientists during the experiment.
• The INPUT
• Example: water temperature
– Dependent Variable: variable that changes because of
changes to the independent variable.
• data that is collected through observation and
measurement.
• The OUTCOME
• Example: Breathing rate
• Example: IF we increase the
temperature of the water, THEN
the breathing rate of the fish will
decrease.
Steps 3: Experiment to test your
hypothesis.
Parts of a good experiment:
1) There is a control (what naturally
happens and is used for comparison).
2) Proper sample: large and diverse
enough to represent a given population
(100+).
3) list of all materials used in experiment
(bullet points)
4) step-by-step procedure list of how you
set up your experiment (numbered)
Steps 4: Collect Data and Analyze
Results
–Collect raw data as you conduct the
experiment.
–Analyze results:
• Arrange data into a easy to read table and
graph.
• Summarize results (1-2 sentences, use
data)
• List any possible sources of error in
experiment
• Step 5: Conclusions
– 1-2 sentences summarizing your experiment
– Did your data support your hypothesis? (one
sentence) Why or why not?
– What would you do differently next time?
– Additional questions you may have after
experiment is completed
• Step 6: Peer Review
– As you evaluate the work of others, consider
the following questions:
• Is the experiment repeatable?
• Do you see any possible errors (additional
variables)
• Ask clarifying questions (things that need to be
explained better)
• Are results verifiable?
• CONPTT
Be prepared to answer these questions
from your peers