11020241102_vishal kasi vishwanath

Upload: vishal-kasivishwanath

Post on 06-Apr-2018

231 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    1/13

    GSM

    March 25

    2012Scavenging Report

    -11020241102

    Vishal Kasi

    Vishwanath

  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    2/13

    Contents

    Key Concepts ................................................................................................................................................. 3

    How local is your global growth strategy? .................................................................................................... 5

    New Strategy Directions ............................................................................................................................... 7

    Strategic bets .............................................................................................................................................. 10

    C.K. Prahalad: the man who knew strategy ................................................................................................ 11

    References .................................................................................................................................................. 12

  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    3/13

    Global Strategic Management

    Key Concepts:

    Learnings: Strategic management deals with deciding a long-term course for an organization. This Is

    based centrally on achieving a sustainable competitive advantage. In practice, the 3 stages of strategic

    management i.e. analysis, development and implementation happen simultaneously. Analysis means

    scanning the environment, development is developing a strategy to enter the market and

    implementation is executing the same. Erstwhile, entering a global market was done when the home

    market became unattractive or unprofitable, whereas today simply focusing on the home market cannot

    guarantee strategic competitiveness. The difference between an international and a global strategy is

    that in an international strategy different subsidiaries have autonomy of decision making whereas in aglobal strategy, decision-making is done centrally. Talking about the 3 dimensions of global strategy:

    Configuration and co-ordination: This dimension talks about taking advantage of the synergies between

    nations in terms economies of scale and scope. Also, taking advantage of the resources inherited like the

    location, climate, the stock of natural deposits. There are also resources that have been gained by

    investment over a period of time e.g education, labour productivity, infrastructure , technical

    capabilities and other such skills.

    Standardization: It talks about to what extent can an organization standardize its offerings to different

    countries with minor advantages to suit the local people. What IKEA did was that they offered the same

    standard products globally but when they realized that the US local market needs were different, theyadapted it. This is a good example of adaptive strategy.

    Integration: talks about taking decisions for the firm as a whole instead of a particular country. An

    example given is attacking a competitor in one country to drain its resources for another country or

    countering a competitor attack in another country.

    Excerpts from the reading material:

  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    4/13

  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    5/13

    Source: Global Strategic Management

    By Kamel Mallehi

    J. George Frynas

    Paul Finlay

    How local is your global growth strategy?

    Learnings: This article focuses on 2 aspects: adapting to local markets and shifting of power to

    emerging markets. It takes the example of the US corporate strategy as being dependent on the

    rural-urban divide and the high income-low income segmentation. Strategy in every market

    depends on the costs, opportunities and risks associated with that market. It also includes the

    uncertainty in terms of government regulation, demographics and ultimately finding out what

    adds most value to a market.

    Excerpts from article read:

    As CEOs focus on getting their business models right for an interconnected global economy,

    many recognize that the sources of growth are very much local. Consider changing customerdemand, the biggest driver of change to US corporate strategy. Success involves understandingcustomer segmentationsuch as rural-urban and high income-low income -- and the dynamics

    driving it.

    Even the vast markets of China and India are hardly monolithic, as evident from their cultural

    diversity, inconsistent provincial government policies, etc. Having a truly global strategy is about

  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    6/13

    continuously rebalancing opportunities and risks, encompassing business imperatives such as

    talent, innovation, and regulation, at local levels.

    About balancing costs, risks and opportunities: Ongoing volatility and uncertainty means

    companies are keeping a close eye on costs and risks. But going local focuses on activities that

    add the most value in each market and making selective, rational choices can help balance costs,risks and opportunities.

    Source:http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtml

    Source:http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtml

    http://www.pwc.com/us/en/issues/ceo-agenda-for-managing-talent/index.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/us/en/issues/ceo-agenda-for-innovation-and-technology/index.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/us/en/issues/ceo-agenda-for-regulatory-impact/index.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/us/en/issues/ceo-agenda-for-regulatory-impact/index.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/us/en/issues/ceo-agenda-for-innovation-and-technology/index.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/us/en/issues/ceo-agenda-for-managing-talent/index.jhtml
  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    7/13

    New Strategy Directions

    The following article talks about the fact that the post crisis world demands a much more flexible

    approach to global strategy and organization.

    Learnings:

    Strategies and Competition: Most companies have been basing their global strategies banking on

    an integrated world economy, but now they realize that they have to adapt themselves to national

    differences becoming more pronounced. Strategies emphasizing smoothing out the nationalistic

    differences and focusing on economies of scale have to change and adapt to local needs. Some

    firms have also tried out allocating resources according to their strategic priorities. A number of

    large companies have directed their investment priorities to fast growing economies like China

    and to a certain extent India while tightening the financial taps elsewhere. In these developing

    nations, their home-grown firms have grown like anything to present formidable rivals to ever

    larger size and reach.

    Markets and Products: Customer targeting for multinationals from advanced economies willhave to change. In large emerging economies earlier, companies used to target the urban elite by

    offering premium products. Now, they have to explore more channels and offer a wider variety

    of products to take care of regional differences. The differences include taste, price sensitivities,

    infrastructure for service and delivery, It is hard enough to know how what New York wants is

    different from what Mumbai wants. Now its even harder to know how Mumbai is different from

    Nagpur in terms of demand and behavior patterns. With rural penetration and targeting, falling

    prices lead to frugality being valued more than excess. But the savvier players are already trying

    this approach.Nokias 1,000-plus-employee R&D force in India has engaged in extensive

    product adaptation, some of it focused on rural and other lower-income markets. The results

    include a basic mobile phone that doubles as a flashlight for use during power outages and a

    phone designed to be shared by multiple people.

    Operations and Innovation: The US global giants that were heavily bent towards offshoring have

    post crisis stressed that they have made many investments at home. Even when companies

    continue to do offshoring managing the discourse around it is important. The need to reduce

    global trade imbalances, protectionism and protecting the environment have undermined the

    traditional Chimerica relationship wherein America used to heavily import from China. The

    need to reduce supply chains have arisen. Where processing used to happen at 12 different places

    in parts, efforts are being made to reduce the chain length. The projected shortfall in the globalsupply of engineers have led to high-tech firms with interest in emerging markets are starting to

    think hard about basing their R&D facilities in these countries. The flow of knowledge and

    innovation has also reversed with plants in Mexico becoming models for plants in the US.

    Identity and Reputation: Establishing a one-firm identity will be crucial.The firms that

    http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtml
  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    8/13

    Will be likely to deal with cultural differences are the ones that have clear and well-understood

    values communication norms yet respecting diversity. Post-crisis, with the government taking on

    an expanded role of an investor, customer, regulator and tax collector, corporate diplomacy is

    becoming an important component of strategy in the post-crisis world. CEOs and other

    executives will have to spend more time managing government relationships. Another interesting

    fact is that companies need to come to grips with the fact that the general reputation of business

    is low post crisis. Companies who have faltered need to reinstate their reputation.

    That concludes our whirl around the strategy wheel. If there is one overarching message to take

    away from the trip, its that for the typical multinational the post-crisis world requires a

    somewhat looser approach to strategy and organization than was popular just a few years

    ago. A second important message is that multinationals must increase diversity in their ranks

    but, at the same time, build cohesive corporate cultures and tighten their talent managementpractices. That creates a tension, of course. Nevertheless, developed-world companies

    have to become more cosmopolitan in their worldview and more discriminating in their

    investment choices. They still have timebut not muchto make that adjustment and to exploitwhat remain strong advantages in many sectors.

    Organization structures: Even in terms of organization structure which was focused on being

    integrated pre-crisis, the occurrence of the crisis warrants a different style. We may see more

    powers conferred upon country managers in order to look to adapt to local conditions.

    Companies may move some of their functions from their headquarters. E.g. IBMs global

    procurement office is now located in Shenzhen, China. Cisco set up its second headquarters-

    Cisco East in Bangalore. Then there is a dramatic example of the GM reorganization. The

    companys Mexican and Canadian operations continue to report to the person overseeing them,in the US. Whereas except for Europe their remaining operations report to the head of their

    China operation. In terms of the number of vehicles supplied, China overtook the US as the

    largest market. The management of MNCs need to be more diverse. As per a Boston Consulting

    Group study, the amount of growth targeted in certain geographies is not in proportion to the

    percentage of top personnel from them.

    http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtml
  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    9/13

    Diagram from article read:

    Source:http://www.exed.hbs.edu/assets/Documents/hbr-strategy-new-landscape.pdf

    http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.exed.hbs.edu/assets/Documents/hbr-strategy-new-landscape.pdfhttp://www.exed.hbs.edu/assets/Documents/hbr-strategy-new-landscape.pdfhttp://www.exed.hbs.edu/assets/Documents/hbr-strategy-new-landscape.pdfhttp://www.exed.hbs.edu/assets/Documents/hbr-strategy-new-landscape.pdf
  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    10/13

    Strategic betsLearnings: This article illustrates the concept of strategic bets wherein sometimes, the entire enterprise

    has to be put on risk by its business leader. It shows the example of Dows acquisition of Rohm & Haas.

    This decision was taken by CEO Andrew Liveris as he wanted a fundamental shift in Dows business

    model prevalent that entailed a high reliance on low margin, highly volatile, highly cyclical commodities

    to more differentiation through specialty products. He felt this offered global opportunities and high

    margins. Thus, a short term risk was needed for a long term success. Andrew stuck to his decision inspite

    of huge odds and made it a success. This is the example of a business leader who took a correct decision

    from a long term perspective to gain a competitive advantage and saw it through to the end that the

    decision was implemented.

    The majority of large global corporations will probably have to make this sort of strategic bet sometimein the next 10 years. A number of companies are ahead of the curve, including some from emerging

    markets. Brazil's Vale, Mexico's Cemex, India's United Breweries, South Africa's SABMiller, and

    Luxembourg's Arcelor Mittal have already become world leaders in their industries through strategic

    bets. Other companies, including major corporations from the U.S., Canada, Europe, and Japan, are

    facing big changes or maturity in their markets. They will, from time to time, find themselves forced into

    strategic bets as their best option for thriving in the future.

    The 3 basic reasons for a strategic bet could be:

    1) To acquire a controlling interest over resources or competencies

    2) To escape a declining industry before others see it demise. Example given:In 1996, Allied Signal CEO Lawrence A. Bossidy made exactly that sort of clear-eyed assessment of the

    company's auto parts business, which was responsible for almost 15 percent of its total sales. The

    company sold off the lion's share of its car parts business for $2.1 billion, moving instead to concentrate

    on aerospace and chemical products. Two years later, Bossidy led the purchase of Honeywell, which was

    about half the size of Allied Signal, for a stock swap worth approximately $14 billion, creating a goliath in

    the global aerospace and chemical products markets.

    3) This means acquiring core competencies needed to be successful in an emerging form of an

    enterprise.e.g. Bharti Airtel Ltd.s global expansion strategy.

    Source:http://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdf

    http://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdf
  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    11/13

    C.K. Prahalad: the man who knew strategy

    C.K Prahalad has theorized a great deal on strategy.

    A few learnings from this article would be:

    According to Prahalad and Hamel, a company should figure out what its core competence is , become

    undefeatable in that particular area and then produce a slew of products based on that core

    competence. Furthermore, creating competing strategic business units was harmful for the organization

    leading to unhealthy competition and instead of it, the resources of an organization should be utilized

    where they could be most useful.

    The duo also spoke about strategic intent wherein there needs to be a strategic intent for a business onwhich its long term strategy should be based and around which all its activities could revolve. Hence, the

    intent had to be clear and easily articulated.

    Prahalad and Hamel also spoke about how a firm could pursue its long-term strategy by incrementally

    improving its capabilities. They used examples such and Canon and Sony entered into adjacent markets.

    CK Prahalad also gave an important concept of Bottom of the Pyramid wherein the consumers in

    poorer countries could be targeted by designing products specifically for them. These products needed

    to cater to their being price conscious yet of a certain quality.

    Excerpts:

    Strategic intent:The duo followed this up with the even more stunning paper on "strategic intent" a

    true HBR classic. Impressed by the then seemingly-unstoppable Japanese invasion of the automobile

    sector and the electronics sector, Prahalad and Hamel argued that unlike short-term-focused Americans,

    Japanese planned a long-term strategy based on an intent that was clear, easily articulated, and around

    which all its activities could revolve.

    This research led to a resource-based perspective of a firm's strategic direction, which nicely

    complemented the incumbent theory of competitive advantage as articulated by Harvard's Michael

    Porter. Porter's theory held that a firm's competitive strategy was determined by external, market

    issues: the bargaining power of suppliers and customers, the threat of new entrants and substitutes, etc.

    Prahalad and Hamel articulated the resource-based perspective of how a firm could pursue its long-term

    by incrementally improving its capabilities. They used examples such as Canon (core competence in

    optics) and Sony (in miniaturisation and packaging) which used them to expand into adjacent markets -

    such as laser printers and video recorders respectively.

    http://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdf
  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    12/13

    Thus, by deciding a priori on where they would invest their resources, and by working towards

    ambitious stretch goals (for instance earth-moving equipment maker Komatsu had the singular goal to

    "Beat Caterpillar", its entrenched and much bigger competitor), Japanese firms outsmarted their

    American rivals who were more focused on short-term goals related to stock price and thence executive

    compensation.

    Intriguingly, the idea of intent can be applied to nations too: those that have strategic intent do well,

    those that do not flounder about with no direction. The contrast between the performance of China and

    India can be explained by their respective strategic intents (China intends to be number one, India

    lamely wants to be an also-ran).

    Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: He popularised the idea of the Bottom of the Pyramid, in

    eponymous books and essays.

    The idea is that even though individual consumers in poorer countries may not be able to afford much

    by way of discretionary spending, in aggregate they do form a tempting market. Therefore, if you were

    able to create products that made sense to them, packaged in ways that they could afford, you mightopen up a whole new class of consumers.

    It turns out that many of the world's potential consumers - and certainly India's - fall into this category.

    And firms which succeeded in reaching out to them have demonstrated that these are viable customers.

    Examples include Nirma in detergents, and others who have created tiny one-rupee sachets of health-

    and-beauty products, which would fall into the discretionary spending power of even relatively poor

    people.

    Prahalad was the prime mover behind the idea that large firms including multinational companies could

    profitably target these customers: a version of "doing well by doing good". There has been criticism insome circles who maintained that Prahalad over-estimated the profits that could be made; others

    suggested that there was something unethical about the very idea of, as it were, exploiting the poor.

    Source:http://business.rediff.com/column/2010/apr/21/guest-c-k-prahalad-the-man-who-knew-

    strategy.htm

    References:

    http://business.rediff.com/column/2010/apr/21/guest-c-k-prahalad-the-man-who-knew-

    strategy.htmhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdf

    http://www.exed.hbs.edu/assets/Documents/hbr-strategy-new-landscape.pdf

    http://www.slideshare.net/jpisapia/finding-the-future-and-making-it-happen-5091575

    http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlGlobal Strategic Management-By Kamel Mallehi, J. George Frynas, Paul Finlay

    http://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://business.rediff.com/column/2010/apr/21/guest-c-k-prahalad-the-man-who-knew-strategy.htmhttp://business.rediff.com/column/2010/apr/21/guest-c-k-prahalad-the-man-who-knew-strategy.htmhttp://business.rediff.com/column/2010/apr/21/guest-c-k-prahalad-the-man-who-knew-strategy.htmhttp://business.rediff.com/column/2010/apr/21/guest-c-k-prahalad-the-man-who-knew-strategy.htmhttp://business.rediff.com/column/2010/apr/21/guest-c-k-prahalad-the-man-who-knew-strategy.htmhttp://business.rediff.com/column/2010/apr/21/guest-c-k-prahalad-the-man-who-knew-strategy.htmhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://www.exed.hbs.edu/assets/Documents/hbr-strategy-new-landscape.pdfhttp://www.slideshare.net/jpisapia/finding-the-future-and-making-it-happen-5091575http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/strategy-growth.jhtmlhttp://www.slideshare.net/jpisapia/finding-the-future-and-making-it-happen-5091575http://www.exed.hbs.edu/assets/Documents/hbr-strategy-new-landscape.pdfhttp://www.ram-charan.com/articles/Strategy_and_Business_Strategic_Bets.pdfhttp://business.rediff.com/column/2010/apr/21/guest-c-k-prahalad-the-man-who-knew-strategy.htmhttp://business.rediff.com/column/2010/apr/21/guest-c-k-prahalad-the-man-who-knew-strategy.htmhttp://business.rediff.com/column/2010/apr/21/guest-c-k-prahalad-the-man-who-knew-strategy.htmhttp://business.rediff.com/column/2010/apr/21/guest-c-k-prahalad-the-man-who-knew-strategy.htm
  • 8/2/2019 11020241102_Vishal Kasi Vishwanath

    13/13