11111111111ll1111111i1~1111 n.c. ellerington …

11111111111ll1111111I1~1111 N.C. ELLERINGTON IIHARPWOOP LAKEII CLAIM GROUP

McCLINTOCK TOWNSHIP, HALIBURTON COUNTY, ONTAR£o...

Report on

Diamond Prillins and YLF-EM surveys performed by W.C. Ellerington and

Geological MappiDS Derform$d by c. Marmont

by

Christopher Marmont, M. Se., FCAC November, 1990.

RECEIVED

MtN1KG LANDS SECTlON

11111 IIII~IIIIIIII U II~I NTENTS 31E07SW0007 2.13840 MCCLINTOCK 010C:

INTRODUCTION 3

Location and access 3

Physiography 3

Previous work 3

CURRENT SURVEY 6

Objectives 6

Survey control 7

GEOLOGY 7

Regional geological setting 7

Geology of Hardwood Lake Claim Group 8

Structure 8

Metamorphism 11

Lithology 11

metasediments 11 Unit 1: semi-pelitic gneiss 11 Unit 2: pelitic gneiss 11

meta-igneous rocks 12 Unit 3: granite, 12 Unit 4: gabbroic anorthosite, diorite 12 Unit 5: amphibolite 12 Unit 6: gabbro, norite, peridotite 13 Unit 7: pegmatite 13

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 13

Magnetometer 13

VLF~EM surveys 14

DIAMOND DRILLING 16

Conclusions 17

Recommendations 17

1

List of figures

1 Location of survey area

2 Location of Hardwood Lake Claim Group

3 Table of Lithologies, Hardwood Lake Claim Group.

List of Maps

1 Geology of W.C. Ellerington "Hardwood Lake" claim group, McClintock Township. Scale 1: 2 000, west part.

2 Geology of W.C. Ellerington "Hardwood Lake" claim group, McClintock Township. Scale 1:2 000, east part.

3 VLF-EM Survey, "A-B" and "C" grids, Claims Nos., S. O. 1040260, 1040371

4 VLF-EM Survey, II D" grid, Claim No. S. O. 1040371

5 VLF-EM Survey, II E" grid, Claim No. S. O. 1040303

6 VLF-EM Survey, liE" + IIG" grids, Claims Nos. S. O. 1040303, 1040304, 1040305

7 VLF-EM Survey, "F" Grid, Claims Nos. S. 0 .. 1040300, 1040304

8 VLF-EM Survey, "Road Grid", Claim No. S. O. 1126042

9 Location plan, diamond drill hole 90-WCE-01, Claim No. S. O. 1040371

Appendices

1 Diamond Drill Logs, Hole Number 90-WCE-Ol

2 Lithochemical analyses, rock samples, claims numbers S. O. 1040260 and 1040371

3 Lithochemical analyses, core samples, drill hole 90-WCE-01

4 Summary of petrographic samples

2

\:I£OLOGY OF W.C. ELLERINGTON "HARPWOOP LAKE" CLAIM GROUP, McCLINTOCK TOWNSHIP, HALIBURTON COUNTY, ONTARIO.

INTRODUCTION

During the summer and fall of 1990, Mr. W.C. Ellerington of 1 Main street East, Dorset, Ontario performed a programme of ground VLF-EM surveys, prospecting and diamond drilling on a group of ten mineral claims in McClintock Township, County of Haliburton, Ontario. At the request of Mr. Ellerington, the author conducted a geological survey of the same claims in order to assist in the interpretation of Mr. Ellerington's surveys, and logged Mr. Ellering~on's diamond drill core. The following report describes the res~l ts of work performed by Mr. Ellerington and the author. Figures '1 and 2 show the location of the claims which are numbered as follows:

Claim Con lot half

s. O. 1040260 6 13 S S. O. 1040300 6 10 S S. O. 1040303 6 9 S S. O. 1040304 6 10 N S. O. 1040370 6 11 S S. O. 1040371 6 12 S S. O. 1126030 5 12 S S. O. 1126031 5 12 N S. O. 1126041 5 13 N S. o. 1126042 5 13 S

LQcatiQn and access

The ten contiguous claims are located in McClintock Township Concessions 5 and 6, lots 9 to 13, and are accessible on foot from the Livingston Lake road, some 8 kilometres north-northeast of Dorset (figure 1). The westernmost claims are also accessible by boat via Hardwood Lake. Water supplies and hydro power are readily obtainable.

PhysiQgraphy

Relief is moderate, hills rising some 40 metres above Hardwood ~ake. Several north-northeasterly trending linear swamps transect the area. outcrop is moderate to poor, and glacial overburdem, in places at least 26 feet deep obscures bedrock.

Previous work

A copper-nickel showing was discovered by Norm Goldie in the 1940's in McClintock Township, concession 9, lot 18 and concession 10, lot 17j the "south" and "north" showings, respectively. Geochemical, ground magnetic and electro-magnetic

3

Figure 1 Location of survey area

4

. '.

"~

------------------~------------------~-----------, T.~

t

o sao ""

1!!"'IiLd I t • 0 1000 ,.,011 f~

Ha..rdwood LC1ke

Figure 2 Location of Hardwood Lake Claim Group .

5

. Crozie r La.ke.

~'rveys were performed in 1956 on behalf of Midrim Mining Co Ltd. llround magnetic and EN surveys were perfOrmed in 1957. M:r:. Ellerington completed 60me diamond drilling and trenching in 1951'.

Sampling of trenches yielded O. 27% copper and O. 2% nickel over 30 feet, including a six foot section of O. 7% copper and 1. 06% nickel. A diamond drill hole at the southern showing produced values of up to 0.2% copper and 1. 36% nickel over a core length of 15 feet (Assessment files, Resident Geologist's Office, Dorset).

Geological mapping was performed in 1959 by Slocan Van Roi Mines Ltd., who also drilled eleven diamond drill holes for a total of 2981 feet, encountering brown gabbro, diorite. and pegmatite with minor amounts of pyrite, pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite. In 1971' Pamike Mines Ltd conducted an IP survey, completed more geological mapping, noting the predominance of granite and lesser lenticular bodies of nori teo Subsequent diamond drilling produced results similar to those obtained in the earlier program.

Interest in the area was renewed in 1987 with the staking of a group of 49 claims over the original copper-nickel prospects, followed by an airborne geophysical survey in the spring of 1988. Since that time a number of claims have been staked :In the surrounding area, including those of Mr. Ellerington's in the Hardwood Lake area.

In October, 1989, Terraquest Ltd. completed au airborne magnetic and VLF EM survey On behalf of Mr. Ellerington and several other. holders of mineral claims in the immediate area. Several magnetic uni ts were identified, and, on the basis of limited geological information, were interpreted as mafic-ultramafic units possibly along strike from the those associated with the copper-nickel mineralisation further north. Several VLF EM conductors were also identi fied. All are of short length and randomly oriented with respect to the assumed trend of the regional stratigraphy. Mr. Ellerington conducted ground VLF EM surveys in order to verify the positions and strength of conductors identified from the airborne survey.

CURRENT SURVEY

Objectives

The objectives of the present geological survey were several:

1. to provide a geological explanation for the VLF EM condu.ctors, and determine potential drill targets

2. establish the cause of magnetic anomalies

6

map the local geology in order to assess its favourability for potentially economic mineral deposits. ..

Survey control

Control for the geological survey was provided by lines cut and picketted by Mr. Ellerington and assistants using compass and hip chain. Survey lines were oriented parallel to the north-south claim lines (which were also picketted) I spaced at a nominal distance of 330 feet and picketted at intervals of 100 feet. In the eastern part of the claims l where structure and stratigraphy are not clearly defined l traverses were undertaken along and between lines in order to locate as many outcrops a,· possible in this poorly exposed area. To the west, structure and stratigraphy appear to be well defined, and lithological uni~s could be correlated from line to line. The positions of outcrops between traverse lines were established by compass and pacing l and by hip-chain l and several tie-lines were used to check line spacing. Several land survey markers were found. The mining claims were tied in to these points l and to distinct topographic features shown on recent aerial photographs (see figure 2).

Ontario Base Mapping is not Existing 1 inch to 1/4 mile especially accurate in detail.

GEOLOGY

Regional geological setting

available for the claim and· township

survey area. maps a:t.:.'e not

McClintock Township lies within the Central Gneiss Belt (CGB) of the Grenville Province. The only published geological map of the area is that of Freeman (1979) which draws upon unpublished data of Lumbers (see figure 1). This shows an elliptical body of granite and syenite, part of Lumbers' "felsic anorthosite suite", in the area of Hardwood· Lake. This is enveloped by metasedimentary gneisses.

More recently, Davidson and co-workers (1982-1986) have identified a series of distinct geological "domains" and IIsubdomains" in the region, separated by sinuous, linear IIdomain boundary zones". The latter are ductile shear zones composed of highly attenuated rocks of diverse composition. The Hardwood Lake claims lie within the McClintock subdomain of the Algonquin Domain. Davidson and Grant (1986) have performed reconnaissance mapping over western and central Algonquin Park, and make the following observations on McClintock Subdomain which are pertinent to the geology of the Hardwood Lake claims:

1. metamorphism is predominantly granulite facies

7

3.

4.

the terrain consists mainly of metasedimentary gneisses and granulites of uncertain orig~n.

Ductile attenuation, deformation and metamorphism have combined to make identification of original rock types extremely difficult or impossible.

Gneisses of metasedimentary origin can only be recognised with certainty where they contain units of characteristic composition (aluminous, quartzitic, calcareous).

5. Gneiss of plutonic origin can only be recognised with certainty when relict primary texture is preserved. This occurs best in mafic rocks, and in some coarsely K-feldspar-phyric granitoids.

6. The relative state of deformation cannot generally be used a guide to the relative ages of rock units, although it seems likely that some tracts of fairly uniform quartzo-feldspathic gneiss or granulite that are interlayered with metasedimentary rocks, together lying between recognisable metaplutonic rocks masses, may represent earlier intrusions.

Geology of Hardwood Lake Claim Group

The geology of the Hardwood Lake claim group was mapped at a scale of 1: 2 000, between July 30th and September 12th., 1990. Some 90 reference rock samples were collected, and eighteen of these were sectioned for petrographic study, and their offcuts stained to assist estimation of potash feldspar content. A few su1phidebearing samples were analysed for gold and base metals. Results are listed in appendix 2.

Structure

It is convenient to describe the structure of the area before the lithologies. The dominant strike direction of foliation and of the main rock units in the map area is N 20 E to N 30 E. Dips are predominantly to the southeast from 50 to 70 degrees,but in the western part of the claim group, dips shallow to 30 degrees. In the eastern part of the claim group, around Limburner Lake, both the direction and attitudes of dips and strikes are quite variable, perhaps reflecting an earlier period of deformation in a structurally competent block.

Two narrow ductile shear zones divide the claim group into three distinct areas, while a third shear zone occupies the valley containing Rupture Lake on the northwest edge of the claim group.

The western or "Beaver Meadow" shear zone (BMSZ) is characterised by sheared, flaggy, pink granitic pegmatite straight gneiss, and

8

nor arnphiboli teo Underlying this shear zone to the west is a sequence of metasedimentary pelitic and semi-pelitic gneiss.

East of, and overlying, the BMSZ (aiori te?) I and gabbro/nori te, granite. This is bounded to the Lake Shear Zone" (HCSZ).

is complex of anorthositic gabbro, wi th minor quartz monzonite and east by the II Hardwood Lake-Crozier

The HCSZ incl udes quartzo-feldspathic and amphibolite straight gneiss, and metapelitic gneiss. At the Crozier Lake end, most outcrops are well layered, but near Hardwood Lake two zones of straight gneiss are separated by well foliated, but unlayered quartzo-feldspathic gneiss.

A few mineral lineations were measured, and show some (systematic?) variation. West of the BMSZ the azimuth of lineations is 160 degrees; in the BMSZ - 90 to 100 degrees; and in the Hardwood Lake-Limburner Lake area, 180 to 200 degrees.

9

7 granitic pegmatite

6 gabbro

6a orthopyroxene-bearing gabbro 6b quartz diorite 6e peridotite

5 amphibolite

4 anorthositic gabbro

3 quartz monzonite, monzo-diorite granite, quartz monzo-diorite

2 pelitic gneiss

1 semi-pelitio gneiss 1a biotite-rioh 1b plagioolase-

porphyroblastic 1c garnet porphyroblastic

Figure 3 Table of Lithologies, Hardwood Lake Claim Group.

10

"

.--- 'he significance of this variation is not known. (Ore shoots in metamorphic terrains commonly have the same orientation as th,e local lineation. Consequently, knowledge of the latter may a8si~t in drilling mineral occurrences 1.

MetamQrphism

MetamQrphic QrthQPyroxene indicating granulite facies Qf metamQrphism (strQngly pleQchroic, nQ exsQlution features) is present in nearly all rQcks seen in the claim grQup, including semi-pelite, anQrthositic gabbro, granite, quartz mQnzonite and monzo-diorite. The presence of orthopyroxene gives the rock an olive-green hue. It also seems to be susceptible to weathering, wi th iron leaching out, making it di fficul t to obtain a fresh sample from outcrop. SQme mafic rocks appear to contain primary Qrthopyroxene.

LitholQgy

Metasediments

The area west of the BMSZ is composed predominantly of semi-pelitic gneiss with narrower, possibly lenticular, layers of pelitic gneiss. Pelitic gneiss also occurs within the HCSZ. Boulders of pelitic gneiss occur at the eastern edge of claim 1126042, possibly associated wi th calc-silicates seen in a small outcrop on a skidder trail. The calc silicates may be the southeast extension of similar rocks visible near the sand pit southeast of Fletcher Lake.

Unit 1; Semi-pelitic gneiss

Rocks mapped as semi-pelitic gneiss occur in the western part of the claim group, west of the BMSZ. They are composed predominantly of quartz, plagioclase and potash feldspar. Biotite is usually present in minor amounts, but locally reaches some 10% by volume (unit 1a). Garnets are usually a deep red, and present in amounts of 3-4%. The rocks are fairly uniform in lithology and massive, wi tha weak to moderate penetrative fQliation. The texture is granoblastic, equigranular to inequigranular, with mean grain size from 0.5 -1. 0 mm. Locally plagioclase or garnet porphyroblasts attain a diameter of 2 cm (units Ib, lc respectively). 'l'race to minQr amounts of graphite are CQmmon. Minor _ orthopyroxene was noted in some of the more leucocratic rocks in claim 5.0. 1040303 (eg sample 90 WCE-0077).

Unit 2; Pelitic gneiss

The pelitic gneiss is also composed mainly of' potash fe:ldspar, plagioclase and quartz, but is characterised b~ the presence of a pink-mauve garnet. It is generally graphitic, and contains kyanite Qr sillimanite. The latter was identified in sample 90 WeE-OOB1. Small amounts of biotite are usually: present. Pelitic gneiss

11

--~curB mainly to the west of the BMSZ, Lraced intermittently within the HCSZ.

Meta-igneous rocks

but a narrow unit can be

"

Unit 3; quartz monzonite, monzo-diorite. granite. quartz monzodiorite

This rather unsatisfactory grouping of rocks occurs southeast of the HCSZ. Like most lithologies in the area, they are fine grained, granoblastic, and in the field it is difficult to estimate their quartz-feldspar composition, and superficially they have a similar appearance. They are generally leucocratic, with colour indices less than 15. The granitic varieties may resemble semipelitic gneiss and the quartz-poor varieties resemble the anorthositic gabbro of unit 4 (see below). No distinctive mappable uni t was recognised. The predominant lithology is probably a quartz monzonite. By virtue of the absence of clearly recognisable sedimentary features, and the variable dips and strikes in this part of the claim group, these are interpreted as possible older pl u toni crocks.

Unit 4; anorthositic gabbro/diorite

Most of the area between the BMSZ and HCSZ is underlain by anorthositic gabbro. Primary textures were not observed, and the rock is fine to medium grained and leucocratic, with colour indices

.in the range of 5-25. Plagioclase has a composition around An 50. Orthopyroxene is the main mafic mineral ranging up to 20%, with lesser amounts of clinopyroxene and hornblende. Primary orthopyroxene was not seen. Garnet ranges up to 8%. Quartz is ~are, and pyrite is present in amounts of 1-2%. The unit is non~ magnetic. In the field these were termed "diorite", and in fact the feldspar composition is on the border between diorite and gabbroic types. The unit is now termed anorthos~tic gabbro because of outcrops on line 26 which texturally resemble anorthositic gabbro Been elsewhere in the Central Gneiss Belt.

A similar unit is mapped in claim 1126041 east of Limburner Lake, associated with gabbro.

Unit 5; amphibolite

A small sill of amphibolite can be mapped between Limburner and Hardwood Lakes. The distribution of outcrops suggests that the body defines an overturned fold, whose southeastern limb has been boudinaged. On the basis of the few lineations measured, the fold is probably a southwestward-plunging syncline.

12

~ . :ut6j gabbro« norite and ultramafic rocks

A suite of gabbroic rocks lies east of UnitS, extending fr'om Crozier Lake to Hardwood Lake. With colour indices of around 50, they contain plagioclase, orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene and hornblende, with minor bioti te and quartz. Sample 90-WCE-0044 consists of hornblende and piagioclase, with 2-3% magnetite. Sample 90-WCE-0047 near Hardwood Lake contains large crystals of weakly pleochroic orthopyroxene with small roddy exsolution textures, and these may be primary; hence the rock is a norite. Other gabbroic rocks north of the swamp in claim 1040260 are less mafic, and are variably magnetic, accounting for the areomagnetic unit shown on Terraquest's survey plans.

Two small blocks of net-textured gabbro occur just to the south of the amphibolite described above (unit 5). The west-dipping foliation in the gabbro against the easterly dipping foliation of the enclosing granitic gneiss indicates that the mafic block has been rotated.

A small outcrop of gabbro also occurs in the northwest corner of claim 1030371, and contains pyrrhotite. It is also coincident with an airborne magnetic unit.

Boulders of peridotite, and green norite occur in the swamp in claim 1040260. The peridotite resembles that which occurs on the island in Crozier Lake.

Unit 7; pegmatite

Small pegmatite veins can be found locally throughout the area, but in the Hardwood Lake claim group, they are most conspicuous in the BMSZ and HCSZ. In these locations they occur as pink flaggy rock, wi th a straight planar foliation. They have been stretched and dis aggregated and are good "straight gneisses". They are usually strongly magnetic, containing several percent magnetite, and partly account for aeromagnetic anomalies in the BMSZ and HCSZ .

. Geophysical surveys

Aeromagnetic Survey

Several narrow, northeasterly trending magnetic units have been indicated by the aeromagnetic survey. The eas~ern-most magnetic unit extends from Hardwood Lake toward the swamp west of Crozier Lake, where it swings northward. The anomaly is explained by gabbroic rocks containing pyrrhotite and/or magnetite. In addition, near Hardwood Lake, the noritic gabbro is overlain by a pegmatite straight gneiss which contains 2-3% magnetite.

13

;-

;-

The island in Crozier Lake is underlain by peridotite, which is magnetic. It extends to the southwest corner of Crozier Lake b~t was not found further to the southwest.

The second magnetic unit sweeps southwestward across the northwest corner of claim 1040371. Pyrrhotite-bearing gabbro has been found in this area. Further west, in claim 1040370, there is little outcrop, but some magnetite-bearing sheared pink granitic pe9mati te occurs. The same material on the southern boundary of claim 1040300, and north of claim 1040370 in the BMSZ, probably accounts for the magnetic anomaly, but it is also possible that additional gabbroic lenses subcrop.

NO magnetic rocks were found in claims 1040303 and 1040304. The magnetic anomaly in this area coincides with a linear topographic valley, within a sequence of pelitic and semi-pelitic gneiss. At the common corner of the two claims is a strong·VLF EM conductor; and graphite was observed in nearby gneisses. The most likely cause of the magnetic anomaly is either a subcropping mafic/ul tramafic sill, or by pyrrhoti te/magneti te-bearing graphi tic metasediments.

A small swampy area immediately east of the claim boundary between claims 1040303 and 1040300 is also the site of a small aeromagnetic anomaly. The area was prospected, but no explanation for the anomaly could be found. It is possibly caused by a small boudin of mafic rock, or perhaps a pod of pyrrotite-bearing pelitic gneiss.

VLF-EM survey interpretation

All of the VLF-EM anomalies identified by Terraquest were surveyed on the ground by Mr. Ellerington using a Crone Radem instrument. Surveys partly used the grid cut for the geological survey, but Mr. Ellerington also cut additional grids to survey conductors in claim 1040260 and 1040371. The results of these surveys are presented on maps 3-8. The maps show the dip angle readings and profile, and the calculated Fraser filter values which have also been contoured. The maps are drawn at a scale of 1: 2000, and can be overlain on the geology maps.

The results indicate that most conductors in the area are very weak, and not really true conductors. Only one real conductor appears to be present: in the northeast corner of claim 1040303. The survey flight lines were not ideally oriented with respect to the Cutler or Seattle transmitters, and the structuralstratigraphic trend is between 30 and 45 degrees from the ideal orientation for any of the three transmitters.

Road Grid

This grid, in claim 1126042, was surveyed using the Cutler, Maine transmi tter (map 8). In addition, two lines were run by the author

14

.sing the Annapolis transmitter. No conductor was located at this site, and the airborne anomaly is tentatively attributed to tpe power lines along the Livingstone Lake road.

A-B Grid

This grid, in claims 1040260 and 1040371, was surveyed Cutler, Maine transmitter (map 3). A discontinuous weak close to the baseline is attributed to resisti vi ty between quartz monzonite gneiss to the south and weakly and sulphidic metasediments within the HCSZ.

using the conductor co,ntrasts graphitic

A second conductor corresponds to the swamp in claim 1040260. There may also be a bedrock component to the anomaly, since it overlies an inferred body of gabbro and possibly peridotite. Diamond drill hole 90-WCE-01 attempted to test this anomaly, since weak pyrrhotite mineralisation had been discovered by Mr. Ellerington in the hangingwall gabbro.

C and D grids

These grids were cut at right angles in the same part of claim 1040371. Grid C (map 3) was surveyed using the Annapolis, Maryland transmitter, and grid D (map 4) used Cutler, Maine. No anomalies were found. The airborne anomalies may represent weak conductivity contrasts between bedrock and wet overburden.

E Grid

The E Grid was surveyed over claim 1040303 using the Seattle, Washington transmitter, and using the lines cut for the geological survey. No significant conductors were detected (map 5).

The eastern two lines were re-surveyed using the Annapolis, Maryland transmitter, and a strong conductor was located in the northeast corner of the claim (map 6). This was not located by the airborne survey. It corresponds to a tract of low, locally swampy, ground which extends across the entire claim and through claim 1040304. The aeromagnetic survey indicates a coincident magnetic unit. Graphitic pelitic gneisses were observed in several places in the hangingwall and footwall outcrops of this featUJ::e, but nowhere was magnetic rock located. Graphi tic gneiss commonl'y contains pyrite and\or pyrrhotite. If a high amount of pyrrhotite were present such a gneiss might weather recessively and produce a magnetic and VLF anomaly. Alternatively, there may be a subcropping dike or sill of mafic or ultramafic rock. This anomaly warrants further investigation (see below).

Grid F

This grid was surveyed using the Cutler, Maine transmi ttE~r. No anomaly was detected (map 7),

15

'--" rid G

This grid was surveyed using the Annapolis, Maryland transmitter. A weak conductor was located at 900 feet north on the boundary between claims 1040304 and 1040305 (map 6); Graphitic gneiss probably accounts for the anomaly. Again, as at the A-B grid, the anomaly represent more a resistivity contrast than a truly conducti ve body.

The southern part- of the grid defines the northeastern limit of the strong conductor described above (Grid E).

Diamond Drilling

Gabbroic-noritic rocks which are exposed southeast of the swamp in claims 1040260 and 1040371 may be the southerly strike extension of nori tic rocks which host copper-nickel mineralisation in concessions 9 and 10, some 5 kilometres to the north. They contain minor amounts of pyrrhotite. A weak VLF-EM anomaly passes through the swamp immediately west of the pyrrhotitic gabbro, and is considered by the author to represent a less resistive gneissic unit parallel to the general gneissic layering. Diamond drill hole 90-WCE-0 1 was collared in the pyrrhoti tic gabbro with the intention of testing the the VLF anomaly. Attempts to collar an inclined hole were unsuccessful, and the hole was drilled vertically to a depth of 106 feet. Because the dip of the gneisses at this point is 60 to 70 degrees, it is unlikely that the VLF anomaly was. reached. The core was checked with an ohm meter but no conductive layers were detected.

Core recovery was very good. between 56 and 57 feet.

A 30 cm cavity was encountered

No significant sulphide mineralisation was observed in the core. However, between 45 and 66.5 feet, a zone of silicification was noted, enveloping an 8 inch section of breccia containing dolomite, calci te, biotite, sericite and potash feldspar. An envelope of potash feldspar was observed between 53. 5 and 56 feet. Such al teration products are typically associated with Archean gold deposits. Samples from this section of core :were analysed for gold, platinum and palladium. Results of these analyses and of petrographic examination of core are pending.

Drill logs are attached in Appendix 1, and analytical results included in appendix 3.

The drilling was conducted on November 3, 4, 17, 18, 19 and 21.

16

-, Conclusions

Geological mapping of the Hardwood Lake claim group has indicated the presence of a relatively small volume of mafic gneiss, mostly in a band between Hardwood and Crozier Lake. This band has an estimated true thickness of 60 metres (feet), and contains minor iron sulphide mineralisation. No significant sulphide mineralisation was noted in the course of mapping.

Diamond drilling of the mafic unit intersected norite and diorite; and discovered an interesting alteration zone over a core length of 7 metres (21.5 feet).

Only one good VLF conductor was located, appears to be conformable to the enclosing coincides with an aeromagnetic anomaly. subcropping mafic\ul tramafic dike or by gneiss.

Recommendations

in claim 1040303. It graphitic gneisses, and It may be caused by a pyrrhotitic graphitic

The VLF anomaly in claim 1040303 should be closed-off to the southwest, by surveying on the Annapolis transmitter. A horizontal loop EM survey and magnetic survey should be completed over the anomaly to better define its geophYSical characteristics. Soil samples should be collected and analysed for base metals and gold. If these surveys yield encouraging results, the anomaly should be drilled.

Pending results of the core sampling from diamond drill hole 90-WCE-Ol, further drilling of the mafic unit in claims 1040260 and 1040371 may be warranted.

Respectfully submitted,

Christopher Marmont, M. Sc., FGAC.

November 30th., 1990.

17

Certificate

"

I, Christopher Marmont, of 60 Walker Lake Drive, Huntsville, Ontario, POA 1~O, do certify:

1. I am a consulting geologist and Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada.

2. I am a graduate of the University of Oxford with an honours degree of B. A. Geology, 1970j and of the Uni versi ty of Leicester with a M. Sc. degree in Mineral Exploration and MIning Geology, 1975j and have been practicing my profession continuously since graduation.

3. The accompanying report is based upon my personal field work on the Hardwood Lake claim group between July and November, 1990.

4. I have no direct or indirect interest in the property, nor do I expect to receive any such interest.

Christopher Marmont, Consulting Geologist.

Dated 30th November, 1990.

18

"-

References

Culshaw, N. G., Davidson, A. and Nadeau, L. 1983. structural subdivisions of the Grenville Province in the Parry Sound-Algonquin region, Ontarioj in Current Research l :E?art B, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 83-1B, p.243-252.

Davidson, A. 1987. Coroni te survey the latest word; The Foghorn, Newsletter of the Friends of the Grenville, Volume 21 number 3, Summer 1987.

Davidson, A. 1 Culshaw, N. G., and Nadeau, L. 1982a. A tectonometamorphic framework for part of the Grenville Province, Ontario; in Current Research, Part A, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 82-1A, p.175-190.

Davidson, A. and Grant, S. M. 1986. Reconnaissance geology of western and central Algonquin Park and detailed study of coronitic olivine metagabbro, Central Gneiss Belt, Grenville Province of Ontarioj in Current Research, Part B, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 86-1B, p. 837-848.

Freeman, E. B. , Ontario.

(ed). 1979. Geological highway Ontario Geological Survey, Map 2441.

map, sc)Uthern

Appendix 1

Diamond Drill Logs l Hole Number 90-NCE-01 Claim s. o. 1040371.

19

'.

Diamond Drill Logs, Hole Number 90-WeE-01 Claim S. O. 1040371.

Hole located 50 feet west of eastern boundary of claim S.O. 1040371, 850 feet south of # 1 post of same claim.

Hole drilled vertically to a depth of 106 feet.

Drilling performed on November 3, 4, 17, 18, 19, 21.

Driller, owner and operator: W.C. Ellerington, Dorset, Onto

Helpers: F. Swain, Bracebridge, Ontario. W.J. Ellerington, Manotick, Ontario.

Drill: J.K. Smit Winkie drill

Core: AW - 1 3/8 inch diameter core.

Logged by: Christopher Marmont, Huntsville, Ontario.

20

r I 1 -".,-, . .;, . . r' -., ._.' 'I ... "',"-" .' ' "-. -, .. _. -..:.:.:.-~. T-C' j1 ~ . I ~''j'=-'-l~Y (~"-. --;---~ o"bH ~ 1t:'-f..J(£"- 01 '.~. lrrf

>. QJ ~ >.. ao ....

.... 0 ::l r-'GJ _".IJ -L;i :> 0 C 0 ~ 0 .c CII ::l U.IJ .... GJ.... .IJ

~..:l Cf.)

0

I .

2

3

4-

r;.

\ \

0/

IA ~

I \\. o

1 I , f

\ C <)

\/}

:? I - /"

\

'e) \

\

l -III 0 4 .;

\

7 III "I'

'..;,.)

2JI ~+ cr.J ~ )

'I ' "" ...

\ \ [0 -I / + I -;

I .

I \ I 1\-1.1 =

I L J.I. c:' '+ v r:~ .... c1

13.!.~ 1

c: 0 -IoJ !U .... QJ

IoJ ...... <

J.;t.. relativ~ to core axis

4c-,,t:.oLW· ) 1 10/1

.

A· +

2. ') I fr:"-c (;; ,.,..€.

f-

2v,~c.liv<

32.·r,t\~

1 -_v r-ctz<A

+

,.IQ

oj-

STRUCTURE

",-~k 'vt.t..v-:;J

d-~(~

ALTERATION and LITHOLOGY SA' >,E

MINERALIZATION

fJonh-: ~o~ eM,' J

~~ -+- oJ1-~ , c:f. ~~

.

i:.... c.Jc .. :b

f~ ct.1W··'':~ tl~~A(;r .. ..f -

!- II" t;;;, , '(.;; •

(,...........:-~ t;t,-e :rre~t:Jr

.A. ,Lr. Arr'.:V' ~ rj. n- f'l~2. .. tl

-

I-

:Iff: ~ ~ b{;-UJ. ~twe-~ cJ~~' 'f ' . I (/r"'. ~ eve ~) ~ ~_~~J.~. + i y.. JM,j eAVt- Vn ,d.uI fW ~d ~_ s%~-p'rJ{B--J.· M~~ rhoiodz.~ ~i~

I

JJrr.. ~.

is -r1~rev~ '10 I0CC-C' 70 I

~""'<:IG~

. ~ .. _ .. ___ w_ ........ ....- ... -----.... -.--- .

.

.

I . ~.-- ] .. '. . L "_ 1.."-;-, _ .1- .:.--. 1.-, -; i.'~- ) ..... -- ~......:.::. . ':i'::':'~; ~ ~ ~J-:~ '1:1\_~<~'L ~..::...::" ~ ~ ~

./1~' 1>]) H: qo -UCG'.-O I ~2cjq

c ALTERATION

:>.. <II 0 .ilL relativE

)

e-. ~ '"' .... STRUCTURE and LITHOLOGY

"

:I ""'

' ~AMPLE

CI) ..... "'::l'-' III to core axh MINERALIZATION " -.. ,

' .. .. , :> o c () '"' o ...c III :J OJ • . ' '.

:... .'" U .u '"' ""' <IJ .... '-' .... a: ..J til < rJ~) ~ ~)~.

, ,. . '

\. I ~~Wd~k~

" ojtv )3F

, I 21. p~ . ..

J> 'I ~ , . jo.. . . . / I

'- \ j . i \ \

\

o , , .

, ...- 29-Jr~ 2 j-e1kfw- 9~~ vr:A.- 'L..z..t j S" -'e ,..,...

17

" \ / JS -.ti~ ~. }i..p -;lzv,-v-

'\ ~~ ,. .... ..... ..

18

"- , . l- I-Iq ,

'\ "-I

,/ h-J.c)@~ " -- ...; ~ P~C~) oj f:4,<,tptt- ~tL -- C""-r~

/ . C' t.'"ill~ ~ t ... .:' c.:.CJ

t-

20

2/ / .f- .1-

I~ :::22. ,30 .f:..d'~

) ~f1,u.:.,.s eeL;;.....

'10 v:;c( -0702-12..

. . of-.

!-,

I .. ~C'akl::J Mcrb..;.·

\ '.

\ . -

23

14 . I ,

, W:"I r;r pv(';~I:~ ~ 01-

. 1> ,

k 42..-jo14~ rc.L6..L to rt w-?crt.S f"'\~N.L..

. 32-P?~ f 10 t..~1 C'>"\ . . ------ ' 10

" , , , " , " ,. __ , , .. : " ":.;.. "L:'/<" j' :"', ' .' )i,' r:" "f-: '.': r .,\'~' (,:c,:: I, I .1... I. ], ,'. L-~ -L, .. ~:--1 ...... , .. ,-_ )..4,' _.t"..... r·· .. ,··.;"., .... -- ," • '.' ........ ..:" .. , .... -'---'-.• _ ~.~ ........ ,.,_ •• _ •. _.', •.. .w.,.·~" .. _I-.1{._4* ... """'--.,~P .... ~ .. , ... -- -'""'-----.....

, J

c,~~· ~ ~o.f "l, 1>'"0 H 'IO-l.,JCG -0 I >. OJ g ... 1 ALTERATION .....

>. ClO '"'..... """" re ativE " 0 "~ ,STRUCTURE and LITHOLOCY . \ ~ -;; '2 ~ ~ to eoce axi, MINERALIZATION . . . SA., ~I£ o "ctll::l OJ CJ l.J '"' l.J OJ .... l.J.... "

r::.::...:l til <:

.~.. ~

" .. : .:2,b

~7

1\0/ , e \ rqih 1.<-1: 10 ~) 1cW-tJ -f:i-..bvd • ' ' .. 1 32-k~ 6'cc<u>'~. ~ "" ~ fc_ "j J,A .'

\ a.r fV"J.,,<'-& ~r -0

'- I- ~ (? .1 - ... -t-. - . .

IS' I ~ .

_ ,,) po 0 J r-~ . ......L.~ • .> )) Pr'-lq , ,

! ~ ~ . . ~, '

'\ '

)'0

. / ,;' 11

. .,. " J..4- .....t.}Lu~;..,.. . 'I ,-,,: I- "r, I-

l 2i-~.~ \ .'"

, 0../ " \' \

32.

33

/' . +- t-o ~

.' . . , 'I

34-

./ \.

. ,,.-:' , ...

- :. '\. ,', K '" F-I ,I \ r~ fF.;.h f"-r46 .,e,.;. td.J

. ("' I " \. ,1 / 0,

i ...; ",,' 0 •

I .~. 14-'> -fd"'£~ Y/ -I-'-! -:'0 - ft'-<."a.~

.

~5

36

}7

12

3. C'/

J • . ., .. --~ t ~ I 't;? i

'ill " Ul -. ILl ,'. tIC

: <, ' ~ r",~';' '~ ~ . ~ • "I.:,., ',' ,~ " ,..,

' '

< ~", ' , . ~,

E J1 . J1 \l) ", ' '

'] . i. > ~

.U , < " III ' J ')

\i ." . r ' '., ( .: .. ~ t. , ' ,

'U. I • • I

il . 1

.f' ~ I ' ,

~ 11~ J I

1" -G I

",~ oJ ~ .~ "9~ ~ I >-~ 't:l I 0

h' ...3

~11 .'1 -l ~ ~ 0 Q.. ::r:: I ]r I:-< "'" ~ t ~ " H

1 "" '\>

~ 1 ~ l •. .! <:J 11 ,. I {' ~ \ ':.J... t..U

'i '4 J

~ \j

\ 1 ~ r4 ! 3 . v

f

,.} I ~1 -.3_; I

~ t"'- o I

, ' (J t . N I • ~

I

,"1 :r z

il~ :"r~ ~ -.J ~4

0 i - t~ "",1 A H

~4 ~ -1 l t - Z I:-< I 0 ~ c....

A H' N ~ ~ -2 <:;;..

t1: I I:-< H ~~ j r 1 ~'C~ &-' ,'t I P:< C < ,~ ILl 1\1 P:<

l-~t:: ~1 '~ I:-< ILl ""-.,l JCl ~ z !\j I < H ....

'::1 , l:: ". n I

f I ~ "J r-l "l-. .

.j ,;.;J..

i I

, " -.l.

, J

\,.J 'J ,J

'." ~.~ '~ VI .. VI -! VI ....... VI

,j f

AJ..MOjaa - ,~ ---I i , I I • I I

____ .r-

I I I I i

'J - N """ .;:;- \..,. -' r--!r- ::j -:t ..:t ...::r .;j :::r ..:l ('1'\ ...:I

Q;, ::l'" e, N ...J- ...:r lJ\ . ..('\

I

. ~ "

: ~ .L

.. '

i· ..

~ .::: .~ x ..., til t\I

..... (11

Q) '"' 1-1 0 U

~ 3

\j . uope.xa~ IV

': .... -..... . '.

\.

] '-" . . .

.. t I I

"

"

1

1

'1

l.

1 . i ~

1

1 ...L

I\'"

~ -..0

J

:r.. A ~

I

W·

~ . . ~

Ul

• I

.

;.-. t . t:I 0 ...l 0 :r:: f-4 , H ...l '1

~

I

ti Z 0

·H Z f-I 0 <1; H N f-I H

~1 ~'C...l 0:: c<1; !J:.l CII 0:: f-4 !J:.l ...l Z f·j < H :r:

--.l , •

w 0:: ;:::J f-I tJ :;:J p:; f-4 Ul

~ .::J I

...... :<

~ j u CII res ..... C1l .:J C1l s.. t s.. 0 :

.~ u \ .

~ 0 - .:1 VI ~ u

uopS.la:qv \11 .~11 u VI

VI .1 I 3.l nJ :>n.l::) S

" .

.' '\ pue / I '(30 1OlP11 ",' .... I '-kl<}f\O:><Ilj

I I

V\ ...!) r-....0 '-.D ~ .

. ,

. '

I

t;

~.

t l

·1 1~ 'J

•

I

') ~

,t 1/\ .:::J

0

~

I '\ '\{

/

/, '( ., /

, I

..... C' . -0 .J)

.'

• 'r, ~d-.~

!'1 0 J \~ , '-' . .)

U ; - r;; ,

I i1 ! I

!

i I I I .

. • • 1

.Ji -..)

L t

j -j I

\l~ l'ii .J .-1.,)

4 t I "

it 4 d h

I .~ . ;J. <:) - I I

I • .. ".

I . ( "- /}; " r r I \ / , , ..... :.' /

'\ \ . \ ' '\ \ /' /' "-

"- " / /.

/ I / ., \ ,/ , " f

I I I I i I I I I

I') - N ,..r. :J '-" J> f' "l''' l"'- f' f" f" l"- f"..... ..... t' r-

.

. ·;1·. '\. .

.....l. •

, -.j"

j

• '* • j' . , . ~ .

.' :'\

"

.....l. •

" -' I

·1

"

~

:r: p A

,

.

W .-l ll<

~ tf.I

'>-t t!l a ' . .-l a ::r:: H ..... ...:I

z 0 H

z H a < ..... N H H <00...:1 ~ c< W Cll~ H W ...:I Z < .....

~

W 0:: :::l H 0 ::> 0:: H (I)

'OJ Ul :> 'M

.... >! w Cll <II ...... QI QJ ,... ~ 0

u

"l 0 W

uOHlI~a:I1V

, a~nl:)n~lS pUll

A~O 1 o It=U 1. A.I3hO::>3H

. '.

I

,

J .

~-J .J. ..fl ...

i"

&:1 0.,

.43 .. It l

1 ~ ~

'J ::t..

. I

, •

I ,

II flJ ,- '-...., ~ II

" , . ....- '. - \. - \ "

\

,./ \. - ) :-..- '. .

-~ I I

.

,

"

• I t I .i1 {·l ~ 1

::b " .

1 ~ ~~ . ~

1J 0

~

1 t , I . • I

~rj

I ~!'1

j...}

~ ~ ~ -- i "1.,.-, \/)~

I . .., I q

~ ~

.,.)

.~ ..... .)...

J

P,

• • t

~ .j

<h , '"' !vi

I I . ( I,

I . -VI

• • I.

/ " I I ....... -\. ........ / - .,....- ~

",.-

I -../"'/

,/' "- ./ .. - I

., _. -, '- "- -

• i i t -cAl G

1

·1

l

i

.1

1 ..

...L

• J , ,

I I

j ~ ~

\" ·1 I;l

t: ~ ,I 3 \ ~ C I .~ .. I

~~----~---------------+-I----~~~I--+-.--------~~--------~I~--------~~--------~.--------:

1 "

-1

lu \,)

3

IJ\

~!i ~. ~

~~J t~~

I

~+_----~---------------;.r.~.--------~~--------~.-----------4.-----------+-·----------+\--------0""

. I . • . •

1 ~~_u~+_--------------_t-----------4_.----------+_--~~----~.--------~~--------~~------~ ~.~ • I >

~ §: ~. j ~~ .~ .~ 0 ~

u ~ , , "4 .3 ?q, t·J

•

UOllB.xa:qv

, \ ,I .~

Vi

I • I

.1 '. 'I I • I

I 1. ' . ,

I ,.J-

·L

, .!

:1 ': ':-,I

1 , ,

'~

':1-,! ' -I

; ,-"

.. \ I

-

.,

:r:: A A

'11, . ' , . ~.

;. "S" l "L .

, ,-.

w o-l

.~. . . '

, , ,

. . , I . ,- ..

. '

1 . - .

>< , -.e"

j 0 .....:I . 0 ,::r: 1:-1 H ~.

:g

t I

• :z; 0 H

Z 1:-1 0 <t: H N 1:-1 H ~"tIo-l p:; C ~ t4 1'0, p:; 1:-1. W .....:I Z < H

:L: r I

W ~ ::J 1:-1 f..) "

::J ~ 1:-1 Vol

~ .::! l

..... x w <\I <'3 ..... OJ QI ,.. k 0 .

u

~ 0 U

. . uopua:nv

a.l n=l :>0.1 ~ S

\\~\~ pue ;;golo4~1'l

A.1afl.O::lall • ~ \J\ -..II

D <;) C) - - -

.

, ., .. . -... "

I I • I I I

. , . I . -, ' J

.

• •

I • I

• • ' .

I , f I I I

. . f f ' , , I 'I

:r. . Q

\l]

• • • .. I I I

-- - .

Appendix 2

Lithochemical analyses, rock samples, claims numbers S. O. 1040260 and 1040371

21

J J J J I J

,Chemex Labs Ltd. Analytical Chemists· Geochemists' Registered Assayers

5175 Timbertea Blvd., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4W 2S3 PHONE: 416-624-2806

[CERTIFICATE~"-' A9;;;~~;

MARMONT, CHRISTOPHER

Project: ·P.O.# :

Samples submitted to ou~ lab in Mississauga, ON. This report was printed on 26-0CT-90.

SAMPLE PREPARATION

CHEMEX NUMBERj CODE SAMPLES DESCRIPTION

248 11 Geochem Zr ring approx 150 mesh 294 11 Crush and split (0-10 pounds) 232 11 PERCI~ORIC-NITRIC-RYDROFLUORIC D

CHEMEX CODE

975 977 976 578 573 565 575 561 576 562 563 569 577 566 584 570 568 554 583 564 559 560

I

582 579 S72 556 558

NUMBER SAMPLES

11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

IU. J MAn,v,v~T, c,nnldrOPht::n J MINERAL EXPLORATION SERVICES BOX 231, RR #4

, HUNTSVILLE, ON POA lKO

Comments:

ANAL YTICAL PROCEDURES

DESCRIPTION METHOD

Au ppb: ICP-fluorescence package FA-ICP-AFS Pd ppb: ICP-fluorescence package FA-ICP-AFS Pt ppb: ICP-Fluorescence package FA-ICP-AFS Ag ppm: 24 element, rock" core AAS Al %: 24 element, rock" core ICP-AES Ba ppm: 24 element, rock " core ICP-AES Be ppm: 24 element, rock" core ICP-AES Bi ppm: 24 element, rock" cora ICP-AES Ca %: 24 element, rock " core ICP-AES Cd ppm: 24 element, rock " core ICP-AES Co ppm: 24 element, rock" core ICP-AES Cr ppm: 24 element, rock " core ICP-AES Cu ppm: 24 element, rock " core ICP-AES Fe %: 24 element, rock " core ICP-AES K %: 24 element. rock " core ICP-AES Mg %: 24 element, rock" core ICP-AES Mn ppm: 24 element, rock " core ICP-AES Mo ppm: 24 element, rock" core ICP-AES Na %: 24 element, rock " core ICP-AES Ni ppm: 24 element, rock " core ICP-AES P ppm: 24 element, rock " core ICP-AES Ph ppm: 24 element, rock" core ICP-AES Sr ppm: 24 element, rock" core ICP-AES Ti %: 24 element, rock " core ICP-AES V ppm: 24 element, rock " core ICP-AES W ppm: 24 element, rock &. core ICP-AES Zn ppm: 2~ element, rock .Ii core ICP-AES

A9025053

)

DETECTION UPPER LIMIT LIMIT

2 10000 2 10000 5 10000

0.5 200 0.01 25.0

10 10000 0_5 10000

2 10000 0.01 25.0

0_5 10000 1 10000 1 10000 1 10000

0.01 25.0 0.01 20.0 0.01 20.0

5 10000 1 10000

0.01 5.00 1 10000

10 10000 2 10000 1 10000

0.01 10.00 1 10000

10. 10000 2 10000

SAMl?LE DESCRIPTION

gO BLIC 0001 gO BLlt 0004 gO FRS 0001 90 FRS 0002 gO FRS 0005

90 FRS 0006 90 WCE 0044 90 lola 0088 90 lola 0090 90 WCE 0601

90 wa 0602

--

Chemex Labs Ltd. Analytical Chemists "Geochemisis • AEl{Iistered Assayers

5175 Timoorlea Blvd., M!ssissauga, Ontario, Canada L4W 2$3 PHONE: 416-624-2806

PREP Au ppb Pd ppb Pt ppb Ag ppm CODE l\FS AFS AFS AAS

I 248 294 248 294 248 294 248 294 248 294

248 294 248 294 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 0.2 248 294 2 < 2 < 5 < 0.2 248 294 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 0.2 241l 294 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 0.2

248 294 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 0.2

Al% (ICP)

9.58 i.42 7-.88 8.20

9.50

To: MARMONT. CHRISTOPHER MINERAL EXPLORATION SERVICES BOX 231. RR #4 HUNTSVILLE. ON POA 1KO

,Project : Comments:

Page Number: l-A Total Pages: 1 ", Invoice Date: 26-0CT-90 Invoice No,: ~-9025053 P.O, Numbt > '

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS A902S0S3 ---

Ba. ppm Be ppm Bi ppm Ca % Cd ppm Co ppm Cr ppm Cuppn Fe % (ICP) (IeP) (ICP) (ICP) (ICP) (ICP) (ICP) (IeP) (IC!?)

I I

100 < 0.5 < 2 3.59 < 0.5 86 60 30 i.06

1270 < 0.5 < 2 3.61 < 0.5 26 26B 92 i.54 1400 < 0.5 < 2 1.26 < 0.5 io 24 13 3.95

140 < 0.5 < 2 4.95 0.5 51 IBO 92 i.56

160 < 0.5 < 2 6.00 < 0.5 32 119 23 5.56

.

.

.......

$ (c- 0 E 1 A'

SAMPLE DESCR.Il?TION

90 BU 0001 90 BI.JI:: 0004 90 FRS 0001 90 FRS 0002 90 FRS OOOS '

90 FRS 0006 90 WCE 0044 90 WCE 0088 90 WCE 0090 90 wez: 0601

90 wo: 0602

:

~

Chemex Labs Ltd. Analyocal Chemists' Geochemists' Registered Assayers

5175 Timberiea Blvd., Mississauga. Ontario, Canada l4W 253 PHONE: 416-624-2806

PREP K % Mg% Mnppm MoPfCl CODE (IeP) (IeP) (ICP) (IeP)

248 294 248 294 248 294 248 294 248 294

248 294 248 294 0.31 3.51 490 < 1 248 294 1.87 3.52 835 5 248 294 3.65 1.29 600 4

248 294 0.35 5.85 1295 < 1

248 294 0.28 4.42 1045 1

.

Na % (IeP)

1.74 2.03 1.83 1.27

1.54

I. To: MARMONT, CHRISTOPHER

MINERAL EXPLORATION SERVICES BOX 231, RR#4 HUNTSVILLE, ON POA 1KO

Project : Comments:

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Ni ppm P ppm Pb ppm Sr ppm Ti % (IeP) (IeP) (ICP) (IeP) (IeP)

I

28 240 4 304 0.38 50 2490 4 265 0,67 17 410 18 288 0.41 77 70 2 384 0.28

22 350 2 479 0.25

~~~

V ppm (IeP)

261 208 aa

159

135

Page Number: 1-8 lotal Pagos: 1 Invoice Date: 26-0CT-90 Invoice No.: 1-9025053 P.D: Numb--' ) •

A9025053 ;

W ppm Zn ppm (IeP) (ICi? )

10 76 10 204

< 10 88 10 110.

10 80

.'

gr;~~£ --v

Be I LAB. REPORT NO. ______ _

. '.

OTTAWA~ special 0

BONDAR-CLEGG

SAMPLE SHIPMENT NOTICE

VANCOUVER 0

assay ['J

WHITEHORSE 0

Please analyze by N... normal~

~. methods, the enclosed geochemical I'L}-

prepared [l

unprepared~ samples

. ,It special, please provide special instructions and/or additional remarks

.c. .- ,.,."'---____ ~~ _ ____________ C-..!/..-LZ-:

l

:....::::.." .-:''-<;::..'''''~' '::.-;./,t-=' "I.-~~ __ ~~;r:7r~1.r:A';'--::-:/~'"r/.'~: .; .... _'- .~ _______ _

;r:.;,tal No. Samples _________________ _ No. Parcels in Shipment _--,-________ _

Type of Samples ! No. of

. Samples Sample Numbers Elements to be Analyzed I

(Series) .

Size Fraction to be analyzed (geochem.

Disposal of Oversize: Store 1 month 0

Disposal of Pulps: Store 1 year 0

Dispose of 0

Di3,Jose of 0

Return []

Return [J

Date Shipped ___________ Via _______________ _

Results and Invoices To Be Sent To:

~ Results 0

~ Invoice 0

o Results 0

o Invoice 0

Samples Submitted By

Remarks

Prepaid 0

Collect o

qlienl Project Number

Samples Received By ~=-_. _--,---=-__ _

20 -te-p-tv-

\'/HITF·- [ABORI\Tnpyrnp'! • "I I "'" .. ::-Illprltl(~ r"py

Date Received I

Fllll: ",l-:r:lr'1'ir0r" r 1.111' " ... " •. , --- - .

Jar·Clegg & Company I.IIL LV Canolck Rnatl

,JIlall:!. Ontario KlJ 'X:I1 __

- (613) 7-19-12 ''!X 053-31.13

REPORT: 090-43059.0 ( COMPLETE)

CLIENT: BILL ELLERInGTON PROjECT: NONE

ORlJER ELEhEtH

1 Na Sodi U8

2 Sc Srandiun

3 Cr Chroniuf:l 4 Fe Iron 5 Co Cobalt 6 N i tl ickel 7 In linc

8 As ~,r~efli c 9 Se Selenium

10 Br Broil;ne 11 Rb RubidiuM 12 lr Zi rconiun

U Mo Ho 1 ybdemw H Ag Si lvel' 15 Cd Cadr, iur, 16 Sn 1 in i7 Sb Antifiony

]8 Te T E 'I lUI i Ill] 19 C5 CesiulJ 20 ~a Bariull 21 La LanthdllUI:1 22 Ce Ce i'i 11;1

23 Sr: SariariLJIJ 24 Ell Eilropi IHl

25 Tb TerbiiJl'i 26 yb Ytte(b'un 27 Lu Lutet iun

28 Hf Hafniun 29 . Ta Tantaluii 30 W Tungsten 31 Ir Iridiur.i 32 All Go -I d.

33 Th Thoriur.; 34 U UriinillM 35 ~T Test \/ei9ht

Be 80NDAR-CLEGG

NUMBER OF LOwER ANAL YSES DETECTIOil L1!'ilT

2 0.05 PCT 2 0.5 PPM

2 50 PPM 2 0.5 PCT 2 10 PP~ 2 20 PPH 2 200 PPM

2 1 PPM 2 10 PPM 2 1 PPH 2 10 PPH 2 500 pp~

2 2 PPM 2 5 PPM 2 10 PPM 2 200 PPM 2 0.2 PPM

2 20 PPM 2 1 PPM 2 100 !'PH 2 5 pp~ 2 10 PPM

2 0.2 PPM 2 2 PPM 2 1 pp~, 2 5 pp~ 2 0.5 P?M

2 2 F PM 2 1 P;:H 2 2 pp~ 2 100 P?B 2 5 ppa

2 0.5 PPH 2 0.5 n'M Z 0.01 9

EXTRACT I ON

Gtl()Chemical Lab Report

SUBMITTED BY: B. ELLERINGTON DATE PRINTED: i6-NOV-90

METHOD

Neutron Activation Neutron Activation

Neutron Activation Neutron Activation Neutron Activation Neutron Activation Neutron Activation





Neutron Activation NeLlt ron Ac t ivat Ion Neutron Activation Neutron Activation Neutron Activation

Neutron Activation Neutron Activation

Jfldar-Clegg & C!MIlJllllI} LId 5420 Canolck Road OllawJ. Ontariu KIJ ~1 ...-.

_ (613) 7-19-. fckx 053-1133

[ REPORT: 090-43059.0 ( COMPLETE)

CLIENT: BILL ELLERINGTON PROJECT: tWrlE

SAMPLE TYPES

ROCK

REPORT COPIES TO: DORSET

NUMBER

2

Be BONDAR-CLEGG

SIZE FRACTIotlS IWHBER

-200 2

Geochemical Lab Report

SUBMITTED BY: B. ELLERINGTON DATE PRINTED:16-NOV-90

SAMPLE PREPARATIONS NUMBER

Crush,Pulver~ze -200 2

INVOICE TO: DORSET

Bondar-Clegg '& Company l.1d Be Geochernical . 5420 Canotek Road OUawR Ontario Lab Report

- KIJ SG2 -(613) 749-l .Clex 053·3233 BONDAR-ClEGG

REPORT: 090-43059.0 HAlt PRltlfEOI Hi·1I0V-90

PROJECT: NONE PAGE lA

; - SAKPLE ELEMENT Na Sc Cr Fe Co Ni Zn As Se Sr Rb Zr ! NUMBER UNITS PCT PPM PPM PCT PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PP.~ -,

1040371-001 0.21 101.0 240 24.0 75 57 550 <1 <10 <1 <10 <500 , ! -

85 71 <200 <1 <]0 <1 <10 <500 1040371-002 1.10 30.0 290 11.0

--. '"--~-... '-

_ Bondar-Clcgg & Company l.1d BC Geochemical 5420 Canolek Road Ouallra. Ontario Lab Report KIJ SG2

; _ (613) 749-2220 Telex 053·3233 BUNDAR-CLEGG

DATE PRInTEDI lfi-HOV·99 [- REPORT: 090-43059.0 PROJECT: NOtlE PAGE 1S

[- SAMPLE ELEMENT Mo Ag Cd Sn Sb Te Cs Sa La Ce $,., (IJ

NUMBER UNIlS PPM PPM PPH PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM

1040371-001 <2 <5 <10 <200 <0.2 <20 <1 <100 53 140 23,2 <2 1040371-002 <2 <5 <10 <200 <0.2 <20 <1 170 7 11 2.4 <2

- &ndar-C1egg & Company tid BC Geochemical 15420 Canatek Road Otlawa. Ontario Lab Report KIJ SG2

- (613) 749-2220 Telex 053·3233 BONDAR-CLEGG

BATE PRINTED: 16 NOV 99 L REPORT: 090-43059.0 I PROJECT: NmJE PAGE 1e

SAMPLE ELEMENT Tb Vb Lu Hf Ta W II' Au Til U wr . NUMBER UNITS PPM PPM PPM PPH PPH PPM PPB PPS PPM PPM 9

1040371-001 4 11 1.6 4 <1 <2 <100 14 2.8 0.8 11.00 1040371-002 <1 <5 <0.5 <2 <1 <2 <100 8 <0.5 <0.5 9.77

EQouar-<:lcgg & COOlpany 11d. 5420 Oll1olek Road Ottawa. Ontario

_KUSD2 .~

(6J3) 749-2L. ex 053-3233

REPORT: 090-43059.1

-SAMPLE NUMBER

__ 1040260-001

ELEMENT UNITS

Boodar-eJegg & COOlpany 11d. 5420 Canotek Road Ottg,wa. Ontario . KIJ SD2 (613) 749-2220 Telex 053-3233

REPORT: 090-43059.1

SM\PLE ELEMENT NUMBER

10~0260-001

Bondar-Clcgg & Company 11d. 5420 Canotek Road

. , Ottawa. Ontario - KIJ SD2

(613) 749-2220 Telex 053-3233

REPORT: 090-43059.1

SAMPLE ELEMENT NUMBER UNITS

1040260-001

Na PCT

0.44

Mo PPM

<1

Tb PPM

<0.5

Sc PPM

22.3

Ag PPM

<2

Yb PPM

<2

Be BONDAR-CLEGG

Cr Fe Co Hi PPM PCT PPM PPM

410 21.0 829 3610

._-----

Be BONDAR-CLEGG

Cd Sn So Te PPM PP!1 PPM

<5 <100 0.1 <10

Be BONDAR-CLEGG

Lu Hf Ta W

PPM PPM PPM PPK

0.2 <1 <0.5 1

I DAlE PRINTEDI 16-NQY-99 PROJfCT: NONE

Zn As Se PPM PPM PPM

<100 1.8 21

Grochelnical Lab Report

Br PPM

PAGE 1A

Rb PPM

Zr PPM

<0.5 <5 <200


1

SATE F'RIIHE~t-l6-IlOV 99 PROJfCT: . UmlE

C') 8il La PPM PPM PPM

<0.5 56 3

I DATE PR1"lEDI 16-nOy-gQ PROJECT: flONE

Ir Au Th . PPB PPB PPM

<50 35 0.7

PAGE IS

Ce SI'1 PPk\ PPM

<5 1.60

G'reochelnical JLab Report

PAGE lC

U WT PPI1 9

<0. :Z 11. 32

Eu PPM

<1

,.Jar-Clegg & Compan} ltd ... 20 CUIlOh:k I~xj(l

, Olla" u· Ontario KIJ 'XJ2 ~ (613) 7-49-22 lex 053-3233

REPORT: 090-43G59.2 ( CO~PLETE )

CLIENT: BILL ELLERINGTON PROJECT: NOliE

ORDER ELEMENT

1 Al Aluuimm 2 Fe Tot Tota'i Iron

3 ~n Manganese 4 M9 i'la9nesiur.l 5 Ca Calciurl 6 ija SediuG 7 K Po tass iul'l

8 V Vanadi 1m 9 Cr Chronilltl

.,- 10 Co Ccbalt 11 IIi tiickel 12 Cu r c pp er

n In Zinc 14 As A(sf:t11c 15 Sr Strontilln 16 Y Yttl'iui'l 17 ~o Molybdenun

18 Ag Silver 19 Cd Cadrdum 20 Sn Tin 21 Sb Antil:lony n Te Tt: 1"1 ur iun

23 Ba Ba ri Uti

24 La Lant hafllw 25 Ce Ceriutl 26 W Tllilgsten 27 Pb Lead

28 Bi BiS;Jutil

Be BDNDAR-CLEGG

IWMBER OF LOWER ANAL VSES DETECTIOiI LIMIT

0.02 PCT 0.05 PCT

1 50 PPM 1 0.05 PCT 1 0.05 peT 1 0.05 PCT 1 0.05 PCT

1 I PPM 1 1 P2~ 1 1 PPM

1 PPM 1 PPM

1 1 PPM 1 5 PPM 1 1 PPM 1 1 PPM 1 1 PPM

1 0.2 PPM 1 1 PPM 1 20 PPM 1 5 PPM 1 10 PPM

1 1 PP~ 1 1 PPM 1 5 PPH 1 10 PPM 1 2 PPM

2 PPM

Geochemical lab Report

SUBMITTED BY: B. ELLERINGTON DATE PRINTED: 7-NOV-90

EX TRACT! ot! METHOD

HCL-HN03, (3:1) Ind. Coupled Plasma HCL -HIl03, (3: 1) Ind. Coupled Plas~a

HCL-Htl03, (3:1) Ind. Coupled PlasMa HCL -WJQ3, (3: 1) Ind. Coupled PlasMa HCL -HllO 3, (3 :1) Ind. Coupled Plasma HCL -HtW3, (3:1) Ind. Coupl ed PlasMa HCL-HIW3, (3:1) Ind. Coupled PlaSMa

HC L -H~i 0 3, (3: I) Ind. Coupled Piasna HCL-HIW3, (3:1) Ind. Coupled Plasma hCL -HiJO 3, (3: 1 ) Ind. Coupled Plasna HCL-HN03, (3:1) Ind. Coupled Plasaa HCL -KtJ03, (3: 1) Ind. Coupled Plasna

HCL -Kli03, (3:1) Ind. Coupled Plasma HCL -Hti03, (3:1) Ind. Coupled Plasl'1a HCL-HN03, (3:1) Ind. Coupled Plasaa HLL -Hl103, (3: 1) Ind. Coupled Plasna HCL -HtI03, (3: 1) Ind. Coupled Plas~a

HCl-HN03, (3:1) Ind. Coupled Plasma HCL-Htl03, (3:1) Ind. Coupled Plas~a HCL-HtW3, (3:1) Ind. COllpl ed Plas!'1a HCL-HN03, (3:1) Ind. Coupled Plasna HCL -Hli03, (3: 1) Ind. Coupl ed Plasna

HCL -HtlO3, (3: 1) Ind. Coupled Plasma HCL-KiW3, (3: 1) Ind. Coupled Plasna HCL -HtW'l, (3:l ) Ind. Coupled Plasna HCL-Hii03, (3:1) Ind. Coupled Plasma HCL-HN03, (3:1) Ind. Coupled Plasna

HCL-K;W3, (3:1 ) Ind. Coupled Plasna

Onl~ Kfi SG2

'; (613) 749-2.:.~" lelex053-3233

REPORT~ 090-43059.2 ( CO"PlETE )

CLIENT: BILL ELLERINGTON PROJECT: NONE

SAMPLE TYPES

ROCK


tlUMBER

1

Be BONDAR-CLEGG

SIZE FRACTlmlS

-2GO

Geochemica1 lLab Report

SU8~llTED BY: B. EllERINGTON DATE PRINTED: 7-NOV-SO

Crllsh,Pulverize -200

I~VOICE TO: DORSET

• -Bondar-CIcgg & Company ltd 5420 Cmotek Rnad Onawa:' Onlario

-KIJ 9.J2 ~,

(613) 149-22:", .• lex 053-3233 _

-REPORT: 090-43059.2

- SAMPLE ELEMENT Al NUMBER UNITS PCT

- HO~ 0.15 10f-on!- OOJ

- . v Bondar-CIegg & Company ltd

- 5420 Canolek Rnad Ottaw'!. Ontario KIJ 9.J2 (613) 749-2220 Telex 053-3233

-

- REPORT: 090-43059.2

SAMPLE ELEMENT Cu

- NUMBER UNITS • PPM -

NtFlt~MstR 132 tOll-OJ" -001

--~ ----. ,~.- ------,-,-_._,_. -

•

-'Bondar-Clegg & Company ltd 5420 Canotek Rnad Ottaw". Onlario KIJ 9.J2

- (613) 749-2220 Telex 053-3233

--

REPORT: 090-43059.2

SAMPLE NUM8ER

ELEMENT UNITS

Me 1l~~8EQ {o<"fo!if-OO:J,

Ba PPM

10

BC BONDAR-CLEGG

I Fe Tot Mn Mg Ca

peT PPM PCT PeT

6.03 560 0.56 1. 74

----,,- _.

Zn PPM

68

~

La PP~

52

I

-

I

BC BONDAR-CLEGG

As Sr V PPM PPM PPM

<5 19 52

Be BONDAR-CLEGG

Ce PPM

130

W

PPM

<10

Pb PPM

3


DATE PRINTED: HlQV-9Q

I PROJECT: NONE PAGE 1A

Na K V Cr Co Ni PCT PCT PPM PPM PPM PPM

<0.05 <0.05 153 102 40 42

- ------ .- -.


! DAlE e~JNIED: HWY-90

Mo PPM

5

I Bi

PPM

<5

PROJECT: NONE

Ag PPM

1.1

DATE PRINTED: PROJECT: NONE

PAGE 18

Cd Sn Sb Te PPM PPM PPM PPM

1 <20 <5 <10


7-WQv-gg PAGE lC

I

I

I

Appendix 3

Lithochemical analyses, core samples, drill hole 90-WCE-Ol, Claim S.O. 1040371

21

ij J

I-I ! i , I-

i !

I-i ,

Appendix 4 Summary of petrographic samples

22

-Summary of petrographic samples

90 WCE-

core: -

0003 0004 0007 0008 0009 0015 0041 0044 0047 0055 0059 0060 0061 0066 0072 0077 0081 0084 0086

0701 0702 0703 0704 0705

monzo-diorite granite anorthositic gabbro opx-bearing anorthositic gabbro quartz monzonite monzo-diorite quartz monzonite meta gabbro norite anorthositic gabbro opx-meta gabbro anorthositic quartz gabbro quartz monzo-diorite (andesine) meta-anorthositic gabbro quartz diorite semi pelite or granite gneiss pelitic gneiss with sillimanite semi pelitic gneiss opx-bearing meta gabbro

22. 5' 22. 5' 50. 2' 74. 1 94. 5

mottled norite even textured norite breccia gabbro-norite fliated leuco-norite

25

. . 'i3ond~fI'-CIegg & Company 11d.

;, '5420 Canotek Road Ottawa Ontario~ KIJ 'XJ2

. (6 J3 )749- 2220 'Ielex 053-3233

SAMPLE TYPES

ROCK

NUMBER

2

Be BONDAR-CLEGG

SIZE FRACTIONS NUMBER

-200 2


SA~PLE PREPARATI ONS NUMBE R

Crush, Pulverize -200 2

~ ., " . Bondar-Clegg & Company ltd. . 5420 Canotek Road Ottawa Ontario ~ KIJ CXJ2

. (613) 749-2220 'Idcx OSJ-J2:1J

REPORT: 090-q30S9,1 ( COMPLETE)

SAMPLE TYPES

ROCK


NU~8ER

1

Be BONDAR-CLEGG


-200 1

Geo<~hemical Lab Report

SAMPLE PREPARATIONS NUMBER

Crush,Pulverlze -200 1

INVOICE TO: DORSET

: I.kll;dar-c1egg & Company ltd • 5'420,Canotek Road

Ottaw<!:' Ontari~ K 1J 'XJ2 (613) 749-2220 lclcx 053-3233

CLIENT: BILL ELLERINGTON PROJECT: NONE

SAMPLE TYPES

ROCK


NUMBER

1

Be BONDAR-CLEGG


-200 1


SUBMITTED BY: 8. ELLERINGTON DATE PRINTED: 7-NOV-SO

SAMPLE PREPARAT I m~s NU~BER

Crush,Pulverize -200 1

INVOICE TO: DORSET

Receipt No.

STATEMENT OF ANALYTIC EXPENDITURES

Particulars.

Chris Marmont

Bondar-Clegg

Bondar-Clegg

Parcel post re samples to Bondar-Clegg

Chris Marmont

TOTAL

Amount

$ 396.99

71. 50

100. 00

6. 45

45. 32

$ 620. 26

BILL ELLERINGTON DORSET ONTARIO

5 Analyses of FIRE ASSAY-DCP Gold Palladium Platinum

Sample Preparation 5 Samples of Crush,Pulverize

Subtotal -200

Invoice

" ,,. ..

Invoice

Date

Bondar-CIIcgg & Comp'Jn~ LId. 5420 Canotek Rnad

Ottawa, Ontario KlJ 9G~

(6lJ) 749-2~20 'Ielcx OS.'·J2.11

0159121,

20-DEC-90

Page 1

Report No: 090-43476.0 Project NONE Reference:

PREPAID $120.00 VIA CHEQUE #716

at $16.00 $ 80.00 $ :BO.OO

at $ 4.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00

Tota I: $ 100.00 Cdn --------------

THIS IS A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ACCOUNTS DUE WHEN RENDERED .

(

...

" " . , .... ,. . ~~~ . ': , "

";-. - !",,~ ""';'~" .:\~,., .. """ ~:--.:'-•.• ..,..,. .-...,,: ........ ..-.., ~.,~ '- .

," '"

"

.-

. ~:';"'''''' .,,:. ~.w..-....~_;-. .• w.,~<"~,.,, tI ';. .... _ .• , ... .:ftJ ..... ;,,;,t;.~ 4; >,.,;> <l .. ....; __ •• '-.,. ... ~",.L.:-............ .",.'ht u/. ' ........... - .

. " . . -'~ ... ." ,:":.:' ,~~.,::, .:.

,',. . ~ , :, ... , ___ .... ~'"._.,''''''' ..... _ ..... - ..... - ... - ...... ';;'.r 4.'., ..... ~ __ 10. ... ¥_.~~.-~.-. ; ... -. ...:,. .. -.,_. _.-~--' _· ..... "'--'1 .. ~ . '.:

" ':' ...... :,.. '" ' .. ' ': . :' .:' , '~ ______ w-______ --~--______ --~--______ ----__ ----__ --____ ~--____ ~~~~~ ____ ~~--.. ~ ______ ~ __________________ ~

Areas Shaded in blue for Les espaces ombres bleus sont <lI rusage "Account "'~lstOmers" des clients titulaires d'un compte I Accound:.itl. Telep'hone No. N° de hllephone ~ ;-,." ", ':. '()V766-2~'I-

Nj; r.t1;~jVgt£tZJ

Postal Code PO$tal

~:tt1 ~ 7.31296335 Method of Payment CODE Mode de paiement

• Postage ·1·. Timbres·poste • Meter ~2· " Impressions postales • Permit ·3· " Permi$

, ~ .C~sh/Che,qutt -4-__ " Especes(sP!, .. qu~ , t,Bllled ' ·6· __ .~Factur~ "- :=:J ° Other ..s.. • Autre

• This Bill of lading is subject 10 audit • Do not mail dangerous goods • If sender selects • signature

not reqtJired- option, insurance .gainst Iqss and damage is waived.

Sender's $ignature

• Ce connaissement est sujet .. Wtification • Ne pas poster de INtitres dangl!ll!lUe' • Si I' upediteur oPta pOII1' "signature

non requiu' il renanee au droit de IKtMIir un rembOUl'lement en cas de perte et de dommaoa.

-

". . ": .. ~

,#'"

'!." .'"

----------~ ~ ~~:-=-s~;;~,;;;-,:~~~~i;i;;~;;?;t~:~:;;

'"

104-03,1- 00 t

104 0371- 00 l..

AM>. OF ACCT.

AMT. PAID

BALANCE DUE

50808

--.. '-----~

j 50808

~ r.C~A:SH:-~~~~::::::~;1~AM:;T.:O:F:AC:~~.~~~z:~c=-.i ~ ~--~ __ -,,-,,~,,~~----~~-A-M-T.-P-M-O~--~~~~~~

MCNEV ORDER :'''''' IL-;.....-+-- BALANCE DUE

Chemex Labs Ltd. Analytical Chemists' Geochemists' Registered Assayers

212 Brooksbank Ave., North Vancouver British Columbia, Canada V7 J 2C 1 PHONE: 604·984'{)221

CHEMEX BILLING INFORMATION CODE

Date: 26-0CT-90 G15 Project: G24 P.O. No.:

To: MARMONT, CHRISTOPHER MINERAL EXPLORATION SERVICES BOX 231, RR #4 HUNTSVILLE, ON POA 1KO

*

, ) Inn INVOICE NUMBER I 9 0 2 5 0 5 3

ANALYSIS SAMPLES UNIT DESCRIPTION ANALYSED PRICE AMOUNT

Au, Pd, Pt combi G-24 24 EL. Iep 11 27.50 302.50

Account: ISA Sample preparation and other charges:

Comments:

Billing:

Terms:

For analysis performed on Certificate 19025053

Payment due on receipt of invoice 1.5% per month (18% per annum) charged on overdue accounts

Please Remit Payments to:

CHEMEX LABS L TO. 212 Brooksbank Ave., North Vancouver, B.C. Canada V7 J-2C1

248 294

Geochem - ZR RING Crush and

S- trJ

90 we

t I I I s~

~ fr'4:

00-88 . ~ v.

OOH} 00010 ~

0601

06 0 :4.

11 2.25 24.75 11 2.25 24.75

.00

TOTAL PAYABLE (CDN) $ 352.00

~ ~ \.Vo-Oo! ~

~P. IIV,OJI = /132

l04 0 3 / 1 '" $ j).g

5/11 w: $3r;2... = .t II:, U

Chemex Labs Ltd. Analytical Chemists' Geochemists' Registered Assayers 212 Brooksbank Ave., North Vancouver British Columbia, Canada V7J 2C1 PHONE: 604-984-0221

CHEMEX BILLING INFORMATION CODE

Date: 26-0CT-90 G15 Project: G24 P.O. No.:

To: MARMONT, CHRISTOPHER MINERAL EXPLORATION SERVICES BOX 231, RR #4 HUNTSVILLE, ON POA lKO

*

INVOICE NUMBER I 902 5 0 5 3

ANALYSIS SAMPLES UNIT DESCRIPTION ANALYSED PRICE

Au, Pd,' Pt combi G-24 24 EL. ICP 11 27.50

)

AMOUNT

302.50

Account: ISA Sample preparation and ather

Comments:

Billing:

Terms:

For analysis performed on Certificate 19025053

Payment due an receipt of invoice 1.5% per month (18% per annum) charged on overdue accounts

Please Remit Payments to:

CHEMEX LABS LTD. 212 Brooksbank Ave., North Vancouver, B.C. Canada V7J·2C1

248 294

Geochem - ZR RING Crush and split

5 ,J ' 1 I, s~

()~ ~:

<=to wee 00-88 . dd-V>

00" ~ OOClo ~

OGo I

0601-

11 2.25 24_75 11 2.25 24.75

Total Cost $ 352.00

TOTAL PAYABLE (CON) $ 352.00

~ H~wcro'" kk

$;P, II Lb oj I = JI :. 2

S.o. 104 0 3'11 := $ j 1. g

5/1/ '>( $3'>:t- = .1 nu

v

, . ..-.....,

Report of Work - Analytical

Receipts on hand:

Chemex. Mississauga, I 9025053:

11 samples at 32.00 = $352.00

Only five are due to Hardwood Lake group = $160.00

Four of these are on claim S. O. 1040371 One is on claim S. O. 1126031

Bondar Clegg, Ottawa, 43059. 1, .2, . 3

Total Invoice

Three s ampl es:

1040371-001, 1040371-002 and 1040371-003 are on claim S. O. 1040371

1040260-001 is on claim S. O. 1040260

Forthcoming Invoices:

Bondar Clegg, Ottawa:

5 diamond drill core samples at $24.00

all on claim S. O. 1040371

28

::: $128.00 = $ 32.00

= $ 71. 50

= $ 54.00

= $ 17.50

::: $120. 00

Report of Work - Analytical

Receipts on hand:

Chemex, Mississauga, I 9025053:

11 samples at 32.00 = $352.00

Only five are due to Hardwood Lake group

Four of these are on claim S. O. 1040371 One is on claim S. O. 1126031

Bondar Clegg. Ottawa. 43059.1 .. 2, .3

Total Invoice =

Three s ampl ea :

1040371-001, 1040371-002 and 1040371-003 are on claim S. O. 1040371

1040260 001 is on claim S. O. 1040260

Forthcoming Invoices:

Bondar Clegg, Ottawa:

5 diamond drill core samples at $24.00

all on Claim S. O. 1040371

28

$160.00

$128.00 = $ 32.00

=$71.50

= $ 54.00

= $ 17. 50

$120.00

. - ,

.,

, '. ,,"

,,,',, ' y ....... - ••• :.. . -:~ ~ .. "_~.~t ... "-• .::~. '-;:~ ~" •• :;"' ••• , ..... :,.,. .-.'~~ ' •• :''' ...... r. .... { ..... ' .• <'': ~(".'-" ..... - ~"'., ' .. ~ . ....: ,."-" •. ' ... ":',,~

" .

.- .- -------------~,--.-----

~ JANWILL . PETROGRAPHICS 358 LAVAL STREET

SUDBURY, ONTARIO P3E 2K2

)

{) TEL: 522-0375

TO - --d~-&t/d;~r~- DatetlT!!~11 ______ 2___ 19:20

_____ ~~y-Ck-~-----------------FR 0 M - _____________ ~ <Z0d': -- ___ -------- --- ---- -- ----- -- ---

R E - ____ . ______ ~ __ ~- ____ . _ ... _. -.... --.- ------- --._- ----_ .. -_ ...... .

4 fb· ---f.l~ ./ ~. . ...d 4-~/ lJI . w, C4f"'- r rJ (,J.. IL Iqu

,.

.. ,

".' ~ .. . ':-:.: ' .. ~.:~ ... -.~., ,~::-,:,.~ .. - .,-.-.~ .. ;- .-.~.:,":",:,~"."" .. ,;,.~: .......... ,~, .. :,' .. , ~.",t· .. ·._ .. ".,..-: .:, .~."".:. ;... .. : .. _ ~"".~. ',,_<-.:" ~ __ .

------------~--.-.-.--

... ~ )

JANWILL PETROGRAPHICS 358 LAVAL STREET

SUDBURY, ONTARIO P3E 2K2 n TEL: 522-0375

TO - uutt~-4!1-fri;'-r~- Date ullnrx7Zuuu9. __ uu 19_20

-------~-:1e£J~.IZr-------------------FRO M - _____________ J~_ ?.~ _________ --_ --- _______ -___ -- -- --

~, RE - _________________________________________ --------- --- ------ -- ----- ----

~ j'L~ ~~LLvv:.

!.I" ./ ~. . .d 4-~ / i)j ,WI C~Fr Ut..J, (2. Jql,)

Report of Work - Thin section Preparation

Receipt on hand for 18 thin sections, Janwill Petrographics, Sudbury

Forthcoming receipts:

1 rock and 5 drill core thin sections, Geominex, Gatineau, PQ.

27

215. 10

48.00

263.00

Scale 1 :2000

Fraser filter value

1em=20m

LEGEND

1 em = 10"

dip angle reading and profile

/

W.C. ELLERINGTON HARDWOOD LAKE CLAIM GROUP

VLF EM SURVEY

"Road" Grid; Claim S.O. 1126042 I

Dip angle profiles and I

contoured Fraser Filter

Instrument: Transmitter:

Crone Radem. Cutler, Maine

2.}3840 Map B

® ~(y~. ~. Q7 Northern Development . V" and Mines

Ontario 0

DOCUMENT No. W9009·,g

Report of Work 11111 mllllllllill ~IIII~I u 31E07SW0007 2.13840 MCCLINTOCK

Mining Act (Geophysical, Geological and Geochemical S

Type of Survey(s)

Recorded Holder(s)

W .C, £ L i... i£RINt'it TOw

Survey Company c.t-,n It ro ~Hl?R.. fYt 13~'K 2.. 'll

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical Report)

I

R f -:11;4-,

C H RISro PI-flEf{ MIiRMoIVr - as J-cr~ Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right

Special Provisions Days per Mining Claim Geophysical Claim Prefix Number

For first survey:

(040 2.~o Electromagnetic So Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting) - Magnetometer !O i040 ".> r)O

For each additional survey: - Other 1/ l j {) i04-0 lC})

uSing the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each) ct'tieologica.9 4-0. Isq toli- 0 "104-

Geochemical So lo<to170 Man Days Geophysical Days per

Claim S 0 104 0 3 -, I Complete reverse side and • Electromagnetic S- O

" 2.b 030

enter total(s) here

• Magnetometer S. 0 112.&01' Other So lIlio41

Geological S 0 I I .2. b ()4- 2-

Geochemical

Airborne Credits Days per Claim

Note: Special provisions Electromagnetic credits do not apply to Airborne Magnetometer Surveys.

Other

Mining Claim

Prefix Number

r::u::r .. --JAN

[MINING L

Prefix

~a::1\1I ._ w

~ S 19~

~NOS

900

2284-

10 Yr.

Mining Claim

Number

I:n

n ~tlillUI

Total miles flown over claim(s).

V I f Date 'I Recorded Holder or Agent (~i~ Total number of

)( fJ~""'. )\:). ,q<:fo ,>;(d!?&?~A~ ...... b •

mining claims covered 10 by this report of work.

Certification Verifying Report of Work -......./ I hereby certify that I have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in this Report of Work, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or atter its completion and annexed report is true.

Name and Address of Person Certifying

R R #4-C. 1-1 It , .t T 0 PHE. ~ MftR. MO /II " ilQ.l(" 231 I HU.lV r t V J I-L € I o/llr1W?IO I POA- I/< 0

TelePh~)e No. Dale I Certified B~;~ I;

705 (,~5-/Cf7,( Nov ,30 Il('" C (;).' , I

?,S- 7f( - 24-4'1- Received Stamp .. "

For Office Use Only SOUTHERi'! ONTi.j1~a filli/lNG DIVISION

~ RECEiVED Talal Days Date Recorded

M;~i\AMu1j-, D DEC 2 0 1990 Cr. Recorded ~e.c... ~ I '\¢

Yeo ')iU~7~/ AM PM

A;;:::'G~~ 7 18P1tu,lt! i211 12!3,41516

i lI'I / • 135" " I U1

'RJt.o', ~. ':bo~

® Ministry of

'Q7 Northern Development . V . and Mines

Ontario

DOCUMENT No.

W9009 -19 Report of Work

Instructions rf\.L·s.

• Please type or print. • Refer to Subsection n(19). the Mining Act for assessment work

requirements and maximum credits allowed under this Subsection. • Technical Reports, maps and proof of expenditures in duplicate

shou d e su mIlt to Mining Lands Section, Mineral Development o Ib b'ed 4 (Expenditures, SUbs90'lt 77<')!) 3 8 Mining Act and Lands Branch.

C'n -~'1 ~'} jl:ining DiviSi""'·.lTownshiP or Area ._, Type of Work Performed

ANAL.Y(£ ~ T CHEM Ie ,4L -. .so~THt::R'; orr (Yl,CLINi OCK p. :..t. ';..;: -" . ~ . Recorded Holder

r.J. C . GLL/37..1N cr- ,oN ~._t lti°: V ! Prospector's Ucence No.

./' i A l)Ollri ./ -

Address p J filA IN. ~ ; tiJ."'tt ,De x "~ I

J>c I\SE T POA ItEo TrePhone No. .,/ 71)<;) 7l:,(;' 2284-

Work Performed By CHe(VI~X LA &~ L rJ>, Mls..nHAur.rll, oN rh~/c;) V

Name and Address of Author (of Submission) Date When Work was Performed

C kites ioi>I.,~tt MHR('1(}NT ,.".It' cUI L E-rPLc.tn TIO'" .( €l(lIi"~S. From: ITO: .2.'" Id qc

i,oX ..lJ.i l.Jt 'lP4 I th~.v,.5 V p .... u: tJ IV;: ~D" ,,..,,

Day I Mo. I Yr. ~ Yr.

All the work was performed on Mining Clair,n(s): Mining Claim IND. of Oays Mining Claim I No. of Days I Mining Claim (0, of Days Mining Claim I No. of Days Indicate no. of days performed on each claim. 'See Note No.1 on reverse side

Mining Claim (0, of Days Mining Claim l;O~:~~DayS Mining Claim I~O' of Days

Mining Claim I~O' of Days Mining Claim, CO. of Days Mining Claim

r

No. of Days Fq4'

.?;/d!. 1/'I.t~ rJ y" I (,r:i'(,o8/ I/~(·r, 1/ .~ I.:"~;.~;·E 1/!:c';C; ;0 ,,? ,S~:.: /6'1('03;;1 .t, .&.? !.to ~cr -,""/"'1 [) ~, C:, A .~-.; ".

I M"Illing Claim CO. of Days Mining Claim I No. of Days Mining Claim CO. of Days Mining Claim ('10, of Days Mining Claim No. of Days Mining Claim

I No. of Days

V "ly't:> ":/,,,'j .~.:l_15 /~· .. /.'.r;-Cl·:' ~. ,.~:;'''' /.0 '//: ,;( (Ie;' :I .• ;R,:> it' <11';' ;.-,(,(". ~?'r.{a:. Instructions Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total Total Number of Mining Claims Covered

by this Report of Work Total days credits may be distributed at claim Total Expenditures Days Credits holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per

1$ I ~ [JQJ claim in the expenditure days credit column "'1'~3 ,_.

= I·'"'' 1;/ .,/ , ... )t-~ .... •

(below). ""'"'-.. " 4.....-

.. ' . Mlntng Claims (List In numencal sequence) If space IS inSUffICient attach schedules With reqUIred informatIOn ,

Minioo Claim Expend. Mining Claim Expend. Mining Claim Expend. MininQ Claim Expend.

Prefix Number Days Cr. Prefix Number Days Cr. Prefix Number Days Cr. Prefix Number Days Cr.

.. 1,t;7~.:?{;6 ?.R .:: (f I/';;;SO II <. .:'.~ ....)0

~J6 /b 7,;;,.1<'<J r.'. 11 rr -~ Jo ..joSe '/ ;,:J,j; .-.j .....

6.:; I"> -'"" h':l ;' ;:; R F=r.J: I\/~rl\ -- .., I..ooo.l.if .. ~ /.::J¥C! 176 ;) n ,:; .. ,., .. /:

"S~:· J~ ./.-'f i 7 f :l ~ ~ rJ AN 1 R. 1~Q1 :: /. / /;~ c:. .>\ 3 ;:) /~. ;:' v-

~""..;/' ,/,:;'1 ;'" uJ I ) ,1" MINING LAND S SEC! 10N I , l"f

;;('1 .. " .... ~ ~ '" ""/ I;' /i I Total Number of Days Performed Total Number of Days Claimed Total Number of Days to be Claimed at a Future Date

. . . Certification of BenefiCial Interest See Note No. 2 on reverse Side I hereby certily that, at the time the work was performed. the claims covered in this report of work were recorded in the current recorded holder's name or held under a beneficial interest by the current recorded holder,

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Date • J X fV&'V' ~o 1'190

I hereby certily that I have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.


Ct-if: I J To PH€ R. MI1R Moll r Telephone No.

'7(5) (.'J> - 1979

For Office Use Only

ale Recorded Cr. RecOrdea un; 2. 0 1990

AM PM 7,8,91\0, HIli; /.12,314,5,2-

i

;'

/

® M~'O~RQ.~ t:O Nort~n Development . V... . and MJines

Ontario .--.

r60CUrviEt~T-NO. W9009 -'I'

Instructions m.L.S. - Please type or print. • Refer to Subsection n(19), the Mining Act lor assessment work

requirements and maximum credits allowed under this Subsection. • Technical Reports, maps and proof of expenditures in duplicate

Report of Work should be submiUed to Mining Lands Section, Mineral Development

Mining Act (Expenditures, Subsection 77(19» and Lands 8ranch.

~~~~~----------------~~~----~~~------~~~~ Typa of Work Performed / Mining Division Township or Area TH/l1I !eCnO~ ,l.fll1tt tH.olV s;,. ~ M c: C L J/II roc 1<'

Recorded Holder

Address 1 11;: I iJ4ir IS>, M(4,tI1 ST. E I

All the work was performed on Mining Claim(s): Indicate 00. of days performed on each claim . • See Note No. 1 on reverse side

Prospector's Licence No.

A t;vllf.? Telephone No.

(;i)S')71.t ~2 /3Q..

Date When Work was Performed From: ,.'1 To:

IS- "Iv 2."1 Day Yr. Day

Instructions Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total Total Number of Mining Claims Covered Total days credits may be distributed at claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim In the expenditure days credit column below.

Total Expenditures rYS:ditj I .;. ~ == /7-

by this Report of Work

1/0 I Mining Claims (List in numerical sequence) If space is insufficient, attach schedules with required information

Mining Claim Expend. Mininq Claim Expend.

Prefix Number Days Cr. Prefix Number Days Cr.

_<0 J040:l. L 0 /~ -' .. -, ~ SD II J. j..,O Lf / /,2<-;,-

1/\ <.in.'?£) 0 /,-"><;- J I d h(J'1lJ '/ , -'<, .

I(J'-ID~Q, / J;'~1 •

JD4D'3dJ / /.,'5.

10'-16370 / ,""',' 1040.<'71 r· ., ..... '

II,~ Lo.1(J / .'/ s 1//,;) L 03 I / . :' s

Total Number of Days Performed 'r Total Number 01 Days Claimed

I .. ..

* CertificatIOn of BenefiCial Interest See Note No.2 on reverse Side I hereby certify that. at the time the work was performed. the claims covered in this report 01 work were recorded in the current recorded holder's name or held under a beneficial interest by the current recorded holder.

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claim Expend. Mining Claim Expend. Prefix Number Oays Cr. Prefix Number Days Cr.

AI :CEI VEO

JI N16 1991 . ,",,, .... ...... , .............. "'1l1

IV III'IIII'IIU LH1'll1Jl ) \)1:"" IVN

Total Number of Days to be Claimed at a Future Dale

I hereby certify that I have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto. having performed the work or witnessed same during andlor after its completion and the annexed report is true.


c.t-O:fSrCP/iEI't M/H?.fvlafJf I &Olr 2.!/, leph_~ne No.

70S; '3 S-

For Office Use Only Date Recorded

30 Received Stamp

poll I K 0

OEC 2 u \990 AM PM 7,8!91tnJ 11112;1 .• 213 1415,6

7 U,

\J

I '£ ,.- -

10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

7 If,,tp ·

$herborne Twp.

I 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

~nerborne Twp.

~-~~ Ministry of Northern Development and Mines

Geophysical-Geological-Geochemical Technical Data Statement

Ontario ts 4 (yile_-.~-TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT

F ACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT 'TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) 'f~oL04-Y I ])RILiIAiG;=

Township or Area M, 'L;tvroc K

Claim Holder(s) LI. C, ELL Ett/;.' Bri vN

Survey Company W.e. £QiElI.II'.I&rn,J/t/; C . M/IR f'1C1.MT.

A uthor of Report C· M f1 R M (I "v I

Address of Author 'lox .il i , R f<.. 4- . HtA/VrSv/Lili' I ~I/r foil Ij<O '" ,

Covering Dates of Survey .:::J!lL Y 2...;:. - f..}ovEM/J~7t 3" ItT" tl (line cutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Cut __ ..... 2ggJs .. ·==---'-'...:..7 __________ _

SPECIAL PROVISIONS DAYS CREDITS REQUESTED Geophysical

per claim

-Electromagnetic ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first -Magnetometer

survey. -Radiometric

ENTER 20 days for each -Other. additional survey using Geological 4-0 same grid.

Geochemical

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer ___ Electromagnetic Radiometric __ _ (enter days per claim)

DATE&.301/. ;r,{) SIGNATURE: C ;v(~. Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol._~ _____ Qualifications 2. ~ 2.,$ -Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

...... ................ ,......... .. ~.............................. '"'........................ .. ........ ,. ........................................................................... .

837 (85/12)

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

.......................................... It •••••••••••••••••••••• •

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• It ••••••••••• " •••••••• • ••••••••••••••

So I 0 ~ 0 3>oD ................................................................... jo loC,030"3 ................................................................. S () I Ot,-O JOe;. ~

................................................................. "i So J 04-0 310 ii ................................................................. if SO) Oir 0 5:.1 J ·0 ................................................................. ~ 50 lI~bo.>" .~ .............. ...... ............................................. a 51/ \ , 2-& 0 3/ ~ .................................................................

..}.~ ........... !..{.~ .. ~.r::..~!. ...................... . So J I 2b 04-2-........................................ , ....................... .

..................................................................

. ........................................ '" ....................... .

..................................................................... 11 ••

....................... ~-........................................ .

.... ..... ... ...................... ................................ .

TOT AL CLAlMS'_--L1 o,_-+Gr,---,,-e..:..N+~_

SELF POTENTIAL Instrument ______________________________________________________ Range ________ . ____________ __

Su~eyMethod-------------------------------------------------------------------

Correctionsmade __________________________ -----------------------------------------------

RADIOMETRIC Instrument __________________________________________________________________________________ ___

Values measured ___________________________________________________________________________ _

Energy windows (levels) ____________________________________________________________ _

Height of instrument ______________________________________ Background Count ____________________ __

Size of detector _____________________________________________________________________________ _

Overburden ________________________ ~---------------------------------------------------------(type, depth include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Typeofsurvey ________________________________________________ __

Instrument ___________________________________________________________________________________ _

Accuracy--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Parameters measured _________________________________________________________________________ _

Additional information (for understanding results) _________________________________________________ _

Typeofsu~ey(s)------------------------------------------------------.---------Instrument(s) _______________________________________________________ _

(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy---------------------------------------------------------------------------------(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraftused ______________________________________________________________________ __

Sensorrutiiude _______________________________________________________ __

Navigation and flight path recovery method ______________________________ ~ _______________________ __

Aircraft altitude _____________________________________ Line Spacing _____________________ _

Miles flown over total area Over claims only----------------------

® Ontario

~(y~. U~. Northern Development and Mines

DOCUMENT No.

W9009·'go Report of Work C;:J{V\ (Geophysical. Geological and Geochemical Surveys)

Type 01 Survey{s) C. (£'0,- OG,- , C P. L .; I Mjni~ ~iViSi;

• Please type or print. Instructions InL. S. • Aefer to Section n, the Mining Act for assessment work requirements

and maximum credits allowed per survey type. • If number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form,

attach a list. • Technical Reports and maps in duplicate should be submitted to

Mining Lands Section, Mineral Development and Lands Branch:

I Township or Area ~ -Q'I!: / (VIcCLI/v'I'O C.

Recorded Holder(s)

2 1 3840 Prospector's Licence No.

W . C . £ L LlE' RIN(Jr TON ~I,

v' A )'o;4-a ./ Address S tJ:. I MAull Sf. 1)0 Rj€, ONTP-P..IO Pi? It lEO -.. - . ./ 7~;;~) No, 7 6 ~ ~~Ir , ( 2284-S~rvey Company CHit If ro ? rl t: R. MI1R.MO,v-:- fVlIIVIi'R Ii L E){"PLO RItT/()/V H? RI/Il€" j

BQK 211 Rf ..JI;.~1 HUlVrs VIt..I.~ olVm(u..~ po fI- Iko ./ Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical Report) I Date of Survey (from 8< to) 9 10 C H RISro PHt; /{ MItRMo~r as r:.vI-v~ ~() Jc '10 I l,-- ! ay I 0, I Yr. I Day i MO'.L Yr.

Credits Requested per Each Claim In Columns at right Mmmg Claims Traversed (LIst In numerical sequence) Special Provisions 1 Days per

Mining Claim Mining Claim Mining Claim Geophysical Claim Prefix Number Prefix Number Prefix Number

For first survey:

/' • Electromagnetic i So 10402<"0 Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting) • Magnetometer ! SO /04-0 300 t/

For each addflional survey: • Other jo 104-0 1Cl3 V using the same grid: V-

Enter 20 days (for each) (~eo'Ogica9 ,+-0 S () 104- 010 4- V

Geochemical So lotto '170 V Man Days Geophysical Days per

Claim .s 0 I 1040 311 / Complete reverse side and • Electromagnetic S- O /12(;, 030 / enter total(s) here

• Magnetometer S. 0 112-1;1011 Jr-/ Other So IIl~o4' fv/'

Geological S 0 tIl. b Oq.. ~ 1/ cu::r :r::I\/1 ~n . --- -Geochemical

Airborne Credits ' Days per JAN 1 6 '19! n Claim

Note: Special provisions Electromagnetic i credits do not apply to Airborne Magnetometer MINING L \NUb i titl.lllUI\\ Surveys.

: Olher

c{

Total miles flown over claim(s). I

l V Total number of

I Date : ¥~~older or Agent (Si:;f /0 'K#'W }c,;; ICf'lf): .~A"" __ b mining claims cOllered -. . by this report of work.

Certification Verifying Report of Work -.....L I hereby certify that I have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in this Report of Work, having perlormed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and annexed report is true.

Name and Address ot Person v~""y, .. ",

Z 3f 1 R R. #4- HUIVit V iI-LIE, o/l/r7+Rlo I C. t-I ft I ! T o PHE. rt MflRMOfv I, SO)(' I pOll II< 0

~~51 ;~ 5 - I Cf 7'( Date I Certified By (Si!ll~ V NOv 30 19 'Ie C >'4: ' .. ,

ReceIved Stamp

For Office Use Only SOpTHERlIi ONTAR!O fl1HIING DIVISION

~ RECEiVED

Total Days Date Recorded M:WMMthLuo D DEC 2 0 1990 Cr. Recorded

~ec.... UJ/q¢ ,

...." AM PM ~CC ruSt" "!J~Jlovea as !"!ecOf(Je(l I"rovtncial M~ger, Mining Lands '118!91{u,H!i211t213,415IG

) :1 jl 1""" ,." .

11111111111ll1111111i1~1111 n.c. ellerington …

Documents