1/15/201412.1: truth and validity in logical arguments expectations: l3.2.1: know and use the terms...

32
06/07/22 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Argume 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between a necessary and a sufficient condition within the statement of a theorem.

Upload: jaden-hamilton

Post on 26-Mar-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Expectations:L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of

basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between a necessary and a sufficient condition within the

statement of a theorem.

Page 2: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Logical Argument Statements

Conclusion – final statement

Premises – all statements preceding the conclusion

Page 3: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Valid Argument

An argument is considered valid if the conclusion follows logically from the premises .

Page 4: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Valid Reasoning

If the premises are all true, then the conclusion will be ______.

Page 5: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

What conclusion follows from the premises:

If a polygon is a square, then it is a rectangle.

If a polygon is a rectangle, then it is a parallelogram.

ABCD is a square.

Page 6: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Is this a valid conclusion?

Some triangles are isosceles.

ABC is a triangle.

Conclude: ABC is an isosceles triangle.

Page 7: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Types of Arguments

Modus Ponens: The Law of Detachment

If (p => q) is a true conditional statement and p is a true statement, then ___________________________.

This is a valid form of reasoning.

Page 8: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Affirming the Consequent

If (p => q) is a true conditional statement and q is a true statement, then p must be true.

This is _____ a valid form of reasoning.

Page 9: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Determine if the following conclusion is valid or invalid.

If 2 lines are parallel, then they do not intersect.

l does not intersect m.

Conclude: l is parallel to m

Page 10: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Determine if the following conclusion is valid or invalid.

If a triangle is a right triangle, then it has a right angle.

ΔABC is a right triangle.

Conclude: ΔABC has a right angle.

Page 11: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

More Types of Arguments

Modus Tollens: Law of the Contrapositive

If p => q and ~q are true, then __________________

This is a ________ form of reasoning.

Page 12: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Denying the Antecedent

If p => q and ~p, then _____________.

This is a ___________ valid form of reasoning.

Page 13: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Determine if the following conclusion is valid or invalid.

If x = 4, then x2 = 16.

x2 ≠ 16

Conclude: x ≠ 4

Page 14: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Determine if the following conclusion is valid or invalid.

If x = 3, then x2 = 9.

x ≠ 3

Conclude: x2 ≠ 9

Page 15: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions

In the statement of a theorem in “if- then” form, we can talk about sufficient conditions for the truth of the statement and necessary conditions of the truth of the statement.

This is really just another way of looking at the Law of Detachment and Affirming the Consequent.

Page 16: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

The ___________ is a sufficient condition for the conclusion and the ___________ is a necessary condition of the hypothesis.

Page 17: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Necessary

Consider the statement p => q. We say q is a necessary condition for (or of) p.

Ex: “If if is Sunday, then we do not have school.”

A necessary condition of it being Sunday is that we do not have school, but it is not sufficient to say it must be Sunday if we do not have school.

Page 18: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Sufficient Condition

A sufficient condition is a condition that all by itself guarantees another statement must be true.

Ex: If you legally drive a car, then you are at least 15 years old.”

Driving legally guarantees that a person must be at least 15 years old.

Page 19: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

“If M is the midpoint of segment AB, then AM ≅ MB.”

Given that M is the midpoint, it is necessary (true) that AM ≅ MB.

This means that M being the midpoint is a ____________ condition for AM ≅ MB.

Page 20: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Notice simply saying AM ≅ MB does not guarantee that M is the midpoint of AB, so it is not a sufficient condition.

Page 21: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

“If a triangle is equilateral, then it is isosceles.”

A triangle having 3 congruent sides (equilateral) guarantees that at least 2 sides are congruent, so a triangle being equilateral is sufficient to say it is isosceles.

Page 22: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

“If a person teaches mathematics, then they are good

at algebra.”Because Trevor is a math teacher, can we

conclude he is good at algebra. Justify your answer.

Page 23: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

“If a person teaches mathematics, then they are good

at algebra.”Betty is 32 and is very good at algebra. Can

we correctly conclude that she is a math teacher? Justify.

Page 24: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

Which is not a sufficient condition for 2 lines being coplanar?

A. they are parallel

B. they are perpendicular

C. they intersect

D. they have no common points

E. they have 2 common points

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Page 25: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

Which of the following is a necessary but not sufficient condition for angles to be

supplementary?

A. they form a linear pair.

B. their angle measures add to 180.

C. they are both right angles.

D. their angle measures are 135 and 45.

E. none of the above.

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Page 26: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Bi-Conditional Statements

If a statement and its converse are both true it is called a bi-conditional statement and can be written in ________________ form.

Page 27: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Ex:“If an angle is a right angle, then its measure is

exactly 90°” and “If the measure of an angle is exactly 90°, then it is a right angle” are true converses of each other so they can be combined into a single statement.

Page 28: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Necessary and Sufficient

If a statement is a bi-conditional statement then either part is a necessary and sufficient condition for the entire statement.

Remember all definitions are bi-conditional statements.

Page 29: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

A triangle is a right triangle iff it has a right angle.

Being a right triangle is necessary and sufficient for a triangle to have a right angle and possessing a right angle is necessary and sufficient for a triangle to be a right triangle.

Page 30: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Necessary, Sufficient, Both or Neither

Given the true statement:

“If a quadrilateral is a rhombus (4 congruent sides), then its diagonals are perpendicular.”

Is the following statement necessary, sufficient, both or neither?

The diagonals of ABCD are perpendicular.

Page 31: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Necessary, Sufficient, Both or Neither

Given the true statement:

“A quadrilateral is a rhombus if and only if its 4 sides are congruent.”

Is the following statement necessary, sufficient, both or neither?

The sides of ABCD are all congruent.

Page 32: 1/15/201412.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments Expectations: L3.2.1: Know and use the terms of basic logic L3.3.3: Explain the difference between

04/10/23 12.1: Truth and Validity in Logical Arguments

Assignment

pages 772 – 774,

# 7-15 (odds), 21-34 (all)