US Department 1200 New Jersey Ave SE of Transportation SEP 17 2018 Washington DC 20590

Federal Highway Administration

In Reply Refer To HSST-1B-307

Mr Chris Reese Easi-Set Worldwide 511 9 Catlett Road PO Box 400 Midland VA 22728

Dear Mr Reese

This letter is in response to your July 17 2018 request for the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to review a roadside safety device hardware or system for eligibility for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program This FHW A letter of eligibility is assigned FHW A control number B-307 and is valid until a subsequent letter is issued by FHW A that expressly references this device

Decision

The following device is eligible within the length-of-need with details provided in the form which is attached as an integral part of this letter

bull 12 J-J Hooks Free Standing 19-8 114ft Barrier

Scope of this Letter

To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding new roadside safety devices should meet the crash test and evaluation criteria contained in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) However the FHWA the Department of Transportation and the United States Government do not regulate the manufacture of roadside safety devices Eligibility for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program does not establish approval certification or endorsement of the device for any particular purpose or use

This letter is not a determination by the FHWA the Department of Transportation or the United States Government that a vehicle crash involving the device will result in any particular outcome nor is it a guarantee of the in-service performance of this device Proper manufacturing installation and maintenance are required in order for this device to function as tested

This finding of eligibility is limited to the crashworthiness of the system and does not cover other structural features nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

2

Eligibility for Reimbursement

Based solely on a review of crash test results and certifications submitted by the manufacturer and the crash test laboratory FHW A agrees that the device described herein meets the crash test and evaluation criteria of the AASHTOs MASH Therefore the device is eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program if installed under the range of tested conditions

Name of system 12 J-J Hooks Free Standing 19-8 114ft Barrier Type of system Longitudinal Barrier Test Level MASH Test Level 3 (TL3) Testing conducted by Holmes Solutions LP Date ofrequest July 17 2018 Date initially acknowledged July 18 2018

FHW A concurs with the recommendation of the accredited crash testing laboratory on the attached form

Full Description of the Eligible Device

The device and supporting documentation including reports of the crash tests or other testing done videos of any crash testing andor drawings of the device are described in the attached form

Notice

This eligibility letter is issued for the subject device as tested Modifications made to the device are not covered by this letter Any modifications to this device should be submitted to the user (ie state DOT) as per their requirements

You are expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design installation and maintenance requirements to ensure proper performance

You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the same chemistry mechanical properties and geometry as that submitted for review and that it will meet the test and evaluation criteria of AASHTOs MASH

Issuance of this letter does not convey property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege This letter is based on the premise that information and reports submitted by you are accurate and correct We reserve the right to modify or revoke this letter if (1) there are any inaccuracies in the information submitted in support of your request for this letter (2) the qualification testing was flawed (3) in-service performance or other information reveals safety problems (4) the system is significantly different from the version that was crash tested or (5) any other information indicates that the letter was issued in error or otherwise does not reflect full and complete information about the crashworthiness of the system

3

Standard Provisions

bull To prevent misunderstanding by others this letter of eligibility designated as FHW A control number B-307 shall not be reproduced except in full This letter and the test documentation upon which it is based are public information All such letters and documentation may be reviewed upon request

bull This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHW A to use manufacture or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder

bull If the subject device is a patented product it may be considered to be proprietary If proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects (a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented items (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists or ( c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations Section 635411

Sincerely

Michael S Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Office of Safety

Enclosures

Version 100 (0516) Page 1 of 4

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility of Highway Safety Hardware

Date of Request July 09 2018 I (e New ( Resubmission

Name Chris Reese cu +-~ E 0 II)

Company

Address

Country

Easi-Set Worldwide

5119 Catlett Road PO Box 400 Midland VA 22728

USA

To Michael S Griffith Director FHWA Office of Safety Technologies

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program

Device ampTesting Criterion - Enter from right to left starting with Test Level I - - I System Type Submission Type Device Name Variant Testing Criterion

Test Level

B Rigid Semi-Rigid Barriers (Roadside Median Bridge Railinqs)

(e Physical Crash Testing

( Engineering Analysis

12 J-J Hooks free Standing 19-8 1 4ft Barrier

AASHTO MASH TL3

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration I certify

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety

Hardware and that the evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH

Individual or Organization responsible for the product

Contact Name Chris Reese Same as Submitter [8J

Company Name Easi-Set Worldwide Same as Submitter [8J

Address 5119 Catlett Road PO Box 400 Midland VA 22728 Same as Submitter [8J

Country USA Same as Submitter [8J Enter below all disclosures of financial interests as required by the FHWA Federal-Aid Reimbursement

Eligibility Process for Safety Hardware Devices document

Holmes Solutions LP was contracted by Easi-Set Worldwide to perform full-scale crash testing on the J-J Hooks Free Standing 19-8 1 4 ft MASH Barrier with 12 connector plate There are no shared financial interests in the J-J Hooks Free Standing 19-8 1 4 ft MASH Barrier with 12 connector plate by Holmes Solutions LP or between Eas i-Set Worldwide and Holmes Solutions LP other than the costs involved in the actual crash tests and reports for this submission to FHWA

Version 100 (0516) Page 2 of 4

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

(e New Hardware or ( Modification to bull Significant Modification Existing Hardware

The J-J Hooks F shape free standing barrier system used in this test series consists of 11 barrier lengths of 6000 mm (19-8 frac14ft ) Long utilizing reinforcing bars connecting the proprietary connector plates at each end The barrier system was placed on asphalt concrete along its length The barrier system is connected together via proprietary with 12 connector plate connector plates The connector plates were installed with an approximate 160 mm overlap between adjacent connector plates along the length of the entire barrier installation This equates to an approximate 28 mm (1 1 ) gap between adjacent concrete barrier faces Barrier width measures 606 mm (238) x 8100 mm (31 8) high In the bottom center section of the barrier there is a drain hole for water relief Located on both faces of the barrier at the top of the sloped face are six M16 ferrules used to attach anti-gawk screens if required No gawk screens were fitted for this testing programme At the top of the barrier there are two 5 tonne anchors used for lifting and handling The overall barrier installation length was approximately 660 m and total weight of each barrier is approximately 43 Tonnes

CRASH TESTING

By signature below the Engineer affiliated with the testing laboratory agrees in support of this submission that all of the critical and relevant crash tests for this device listed above were conducted to meet the MASH test criteria The Engineer has determined that no other crash tests are necessary to determine the device meets the MASH criteria

Engineer Name Emerson Ryder

Digitally signed by Emerson Ryder Engineer Signature Emerson Ryder Date 20180704 11 5914 +1200

Address 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Same as Submitter D Country New Zealand Same as Submitter D A brief description of each crash test and its result

Version 100 (0516) Page 3 of 4

Required Test Number

Narrative Description

Evaluation Results

3-10 (11 0OC)

The test vehicle impacted the test installation 1050 mm (413) upstream from concrete barrier segment joint SB and 6A at an angle of 251 degrees and a velocity of 980 kmh(609 mph) The impact point was chosen to increase the chances of occupant ride down accelerations and head slap when impacting test article The barrier contained and redirected the 11 00C test vehicle The vehicle did not underride override or penetrate the installation Veh icle deformations exit trajectory ride down accelerations occupant impact velocities were acceptable in accordance with MASH 2016 criteria The maximum roll of the vehicle was recorded as -92 degrees during the impact maximum pitch was -193 degrees The maximum working width of the system was recorded as 142 m (465) measured from the impact face of the test article Crash test report 13578001 is attached for this test

PASS

3-11 (2270P)

The test vehicle impacted the test installation 1340 mm (5275) upstream from concrete barrier segment joint SB and 6A at an angle of 251 degrees and a velocity of 980 kmh(609 mph) The impact point was chosen to load the joint connection and increase the chances of test vehicle roll over when impacting test article The barrier contained and redirected the 2270P test veh icle The vehicle did not underride override or penetrate the installation Vehicle deformations exit trajectory ride down accelerations occupant impact velocities were acceptable in accordance with MASH 2016 criteria The maximum roll of the vehicle was recorded as -191 degrees during the impact with the maximum pitch of the vehicle being - 135 degrees The maximum working width of the system was recorded as 220 m (721 ft ) measured from the impact face of the test article The maximum dynamic deflection of the system was recorded as 160 m (524)

Crash test report 13578001 is attached for this test

PASS

3-20 (11 00C) Non-Relevant Test not conducted

3-21 (2270P) Non-Relevant Test not conducted

Version 100 (0516) Page 4 of 4

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test

laboratory (cite the laboratorys accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports)

Laboratory Name Holmes Solutions LP

Laboratory Signature Digitally signed by Emerson Ryder Emerson Ryder Date 20180704 120523 +1200

Address 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Same as Submitter D Country New Zealand Same as Submitter D Accreditation Certificate

Number and Dates of current Accreditation period

ISO IEc 1 70252005IANZ Certificate Numberl 022 23 July 2009 to Present Day

D191 tally signed by Chns Reese

Submitter SignaturemiddotChrmiddots Reese DNrna(hn ReeeoaEmiddotSeto bull ema1lacreeseeametcom caUS

Date 201807 06 145403 -0400

Submit Form

ATTACHMENTS Attach to this form

1) Additional disclosures ofrelated financial interest as indicated above

2) A copy of the full test report video and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in

support of this request

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards] For proprietary products a single isometric line drawing is

usually acceptable to illustrate the product with detailed specifications intended use and contact

information provided on the reverse Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted

to facilitate our review

FHWA Official Business Only

Eligibility Letter

Number Date Key Words

2

Eligibility for Reimbursement

Based solely on a review of crash test results and certifications submitted by the manufacturer and the crash test laboratory FHW A agrees that the device described herein meets the crash test and evaluation criteria of the AASHTOs MASH Therefore the device is eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program if installed under the range of tested conditions

Name of system 12 J-J Hooks Free Standing 19-8 114ft Barrier Type of system Longitudinal Barrier Test Level MASH Test Level 3 (TL3) Testing conducted by Holmes Solutions LP Date ofrequest July 17 2018 Date initially acknowledged July 18 2018

FHW A concurs with the recommendation of the accredited crash testing laboratory on the attached form

Full Description of the Eligible Device

The device and supporting documentation including reports of the crash tests or other testing done videos of any crash testing andor drawings of the device are described in the attached form

Notice

This eligibility letter is issued for the subject device as tested Modifications made to the device are not covered by this letter Any modifications to this device should be submitted to the user (ie state DOT) as per their requirements

You are expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design installation and maintenance requirements to ensure proper performance

You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the same chemistry mechanical properties and geometry as that submitted for review and that it will meet the test and evaluation criteria of AASHTOs MASH

Issuance of this letter does not convey property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege This letter is based on the premise that information and reports submitted by you are accurate and correct We reserve the right to modify or revoke this letter if (1) there are any inaccuracies in the information submitted in support of your request for this letter (2) the qualification testing was flawed (3) in-service performance or other information reveals safety problems (4) the system is significantly different from the version that was crash tested or (5) any other information indicates that the letter was issued in error or otherwise does not reflect full and complete information about the crashworthiness of the system

3

Standard Provisions

bull To prevent misunderstanding by others this letter of eligibility designated as FHW A control number B-307 shall not be reproduced except in full This letter and the test documentation upon which it is based are public information All such letters and documentation may be reviewed upon request

bull This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHW A to use manufacture or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder

bull If the subject device is a patented product it may be considered to be proprietary If proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects (a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented items (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists or ( c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations Section 635411

Sincerely

Michael S Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Office of Safety

Enclosures

Version 100 (0516) Page 1 of 4

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility of Highway Safety Hardware

Date of Request July 09 2018 I (e New ( Resubmission

Name Chris Reese cu +-~ E 0 II)

Company

Address

Country

Easi-Set Worldwide

5119 Catlett Road PO Box 400 Midland VA 22728

USA

To Michael S Griffith Director FHWA Office of Safety Technologies

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program

Device ampTesting Criterion - Enter from right to left starting with Test Level I - - I System Type Submission Type Device Name Variant Testing Criterion

Test Level

B Rigid Semi-Rigid Barriers (Roadside Median Bridge Railinqs)

(e Physical Crash Testing

( Engineering Analysis

12 J-J Hooks free Standing 19-8 1 4ft Barrier

AASHTO MASH TL3

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration I certify

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety

Hardware and that the evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH

Individual or Organization responsible for the product

Contact Name Chris Reese Same as Submitter [8J

Company Name Easi-Set Worldwide Same as Submitter [8J

Address 5119 Catlett Road PO Box 400 Midland VA 22728 Same as Submitter [8J

Country USA Same as Submitter [8J Enter below all disclosures of financial interests as required by the FHWA Federal-Aid Reimbursement

Eligibility Process for Safety Hardware Devices document

Holmes Solutions LP was contracted by Easi-Set Worldwide to perform full-scale crash testing on the J-J Hooks Free Standing 19-8 1 4 ft MASH Barrier with 12 connector plate There are no shared financial interests in the J-J Hooks Free Standing 19-8 1 4 ft MASH Barrier with 12 connector plate by Holmes Solutions LP or between Eas i-Set Worldwide and Holmes Solutions LP other than the costs involved in the actual crash tests and reports for this submission to FHWA

Version 100 (0516) Page 2 of 4

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

(e New Hardware or ( Modification to bull Significant Modification Existing Hardware

The J-J Hooks F shape free standing barrier system used in this test series consists of 11 barrier lengths of 6000 mm (19-8 frac14ft ) Long utilizing reinforcing bars connecting the proprietary connector plates at each end The barrier system was placed on asphalt concrete along its length The barrier system is connected together via proprietary with 12 connector plate connector plates The connector plates were installed with an approximate 160 mm overlap between adjacent connector plates along the length of the entire barrier installation This equates to an approximate 28 mm (1 1 ) gap between adjacent concrete barrier faces Barrier width measures 606 mm (238) x 8100 mm (31 8) high In the bottom center section of the barrier there is a drain hole for water relief Located on both faces of the barrier at the top of the sloped face are six M16 ferrules used to attach anti-gawk screens if required No gawk screens were fitted for this testing programme At the top of the barrier there are two 5 tonne anchors used for lifting and handling The overall barrier installation length was approximately 660 m and total weight of each barrier is approximately 43 Tonnes

CRASH TESTING

By signature below the Engineer affiliated with the testing laboratory agrees in support of this submission that all of the critical and relevant crash tests for this device listed above were conducted to meet the MASH test criteria The Engineer has determined that no other crash tests are necessary to determine the device meets the MASH criteria

Engineer Name Emerson Ryder

Digitally signed by Emerson Ryder Engineer Signature Emerson Ryder Date 20180704 11 5914 +1200

Address 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Same as Submitter D Country New Zealand Same as Submitter D A brief description of each crash test and its result

Version 100 (0516) Page 3 of 4

Required Test Number

Narrative Description

Evaluation Results

3-10 (11 0OC)

The test vehicle impacted the test installation 1050 mm (413) upstream from concrete barrier segment joint SB and 6A at an angle of 251 degrees and a velocity of 980 kmh(609 mph) The impact point was chosen to increase the chances of occupant ride down accelerations and head slap when impacting test article The barrier contained and redirected the 11 00C test vehicle The vehicle did not underride override or penetrate the installation Veh icle deformations exit trajectory ride down accelerations occupant impact velocities were acceptable in accordance with MASH 2016 criteria The maximum roll of the vehicle was recorded as -92 degrees during the impact maximum pitch was -193 degrees The maximum working width of the system was recorded as 142 m (465) measured from the impact face of the test article Crash test report 13578001 is attached for this test

PASS

3-11 (2270P)

The test vehicle impacted the test installation 1340 mm (5275) upstream from concrete barrier segment joint SB and 6A at an angle of 251 degrees and a velocity of 980 kmh(609 mph) The impact point was chosen to load the joint connection and increase the chances of test vehicle roll over when impacting test article The barrier contained and redirected the 2270P test veh icle The vehicle did not underride override or penetrate the installation Vehicle deformations exit trajectory ride down accelerations occupant impact velocities were acceptable in accordance with MASH 2016 criteria The maximum roll of the vehicle was recorded as -191 degrees during the impact with the maximum pitch of the vehicle being - 135 degrees The maximum working width of the system was recorded as 220 m (721 ft ) measured from the impact face of the test article The maximum dynamic deflection of the system was recorded as 160 m (524)

Crash test report 13578001 is attached for this test

PASS

3-20 (11 00C) Non-Relevant Test not conducted

3-21 (2270P) Non-Relevant Test not conducted

Version 100 (0516) Page 4 of 4

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test

laboratory (cite the laboratorys accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports)

Laboratory Name Holmes Solutions LP

Laboratory Signature Digitally signed by Emerson Ryder Emerson Ryder Date 20180704 120523 +1200

Address 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Same as Submitter D Country New Zealand Same as Submitter D Accreditation Certificate

Number and Dates of current Accreditation period

ISO IEc 1 70252005IANZ Certificate Numberl 022 23 July 2009 to Present Day

D191 tally signed by Chns Reese

Submitter SignaturemiddotChrmiddots Reese DNrna(hn ReeeoaEmiddotSeto bull ema1lacreeseeametcom caUS

Date 201807 06 145403 -0400

Submit Form

ATTACHMENTS Attach to this form

1) Additional disclosures ofrelated financial interest as indicated above

2) A copy of the full test report video and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in

support of this request

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards] For proprietary products a single isometric line drawing is

usually acceptable to illustrate the product with detailed specifications intended use and contact

information provided on the reverse Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted

to facilitate our review

FHWA Official Business Only

Eligibility Letter

Number Date Key Words

3

Standard Provisions

bull To prevent misunderstanding by others this letter of eligibility designated as FHW A control number B-307 shall not be reproduced except in full This letter and the test documentation upon which it is based are public information All such letters and documentation may be reviewed upon request

bull This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHW A to use manufacture or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder

bull If the subject device is a patented product it may be considered to be proprietary If proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects (a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented items (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists or ( c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations Section 635411

Sincerely

Michael S Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Office of Safety

Enclosures

Version 100 (0516) Page 1 of 4

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility of Highway Safety Hardware

Date of Request July 09 2018 I (e New ( Resubmission

Name Chris Reese cu +-~ E 0 II)

Company

Address

Country

Easi-Set Worldwide

5119 Catlett Road PO Box 400 Midland VA 22728

USA

To Michael S Griffith Director FHWA Office of Safety Technologies

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program

Device ampTesting Criterion - Enter from right to left starting with Test Level I - - I System Type Submission Type Device Name Variant Testing Criterion

Test Level

B Rigid Semi-Rigid Barriers (Roadside Median Bridge Railinqs)

(e Physical Crash Testing

( Engineering Analysis

12 J-J Hooks free Standing 19-8 1 4ft Barrier

AASHTO MASH TL3

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration I certify

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety

Hardware and that the evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH

Individual or Organization responsible for the product

Contact Name Chris Reese Same as Submitter [8J

Company Name Easi-Set Worldwide Same as Submitter [8J

Address 5119 Catlett Road PO Box 400 Midland VA 22728 Same as Submitter [8J

Country USA Same as Submitter [8J Enter below all disclosures of financial interests as required by the FHWA Federal-Aid Reimbursement

Eligibility Process for Safety Hardware Devices document

Holmes Solutions LP was contracted by Easi-Set Worldwide to perform full-scale crash testing on the J-J Hooks Free Standing 19-8 1 4 ft MASH Barrier with 12 connector plate There are no shared financial interests in the J-J Hooks Free Standing 19-8 1 4 ft MASH Barrier with 12 connector plate by Holmes Solutions LP or between Eas i-Set Worldwide and Holmes Solutions LP other than the costs involved in the actual crash tests and reports for this submission to FHWA

Version 100 (0516) Page 2 of 4

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

(e New Hardware or ( Modification to bull Significant Modification Existing Hardware

The J-J Hooks F shape free standing barrier system used in this test series consists of 11 barrier lengths of 6000 mm (19-8 frac14ft ) Long utilizing reinforcing bars connecting the proprietary connector plates at each end The barrier system was placed on asphalt concrete along its length The barrier system is connected together via proprietary with 12 connector plate connector plates The connector plates were installed with an approximate 160 mm overlap between adjacent connector plates along the length of the entire barrier installation This equates to an approximate 28 mm (1 1 ) gap between adjacent concrete barrier faces Barrier width measures 606 mm (238) x 8100 mm (31 8) high In the bottom center section of the barrier there is a drain hole for water relief Located on both faces of the barrier at the top of the sloped face are six M16 ferrules used to attach anti-gawk screens if required No gawk screens were fitted for this testing programme At the top of the barrier there are two 5 tonne anchors used for lifting and handling The overall barrier installation length was approximately 660 m and total weight of each barrier is approximately 43 Tonnes

CRASH TESTING

By signature below the Engineer affiliated with the testing laboratory agrees in support of this submission that all of the critical and relevant crash tests for this device listed above were conducted to meet the MASH test criteria The Engineer has determined that no other crash tests are necessary to determine the device meets the MASH criteria

Engineer Name Emerson Ryder

Digitally signed by Emerson Ryder Engineer Signature Emerson Ryder Date 20180704 11 5914 +1200

Address 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Same as Submitter D Country New Zealand Same as Submitter D A brief description of each crash test and its result

Version 100 (0516) Page 3 of 4

Required Test Number

Narrative Description

Evaluation Results

3-10 (11 0OC)

The test vehicle impacted the test installation 1050 mm (413) upstream from concrete barrier segment joint SB and 6A at an angle of 251 degrees and a velocity of 980 kmh(609 mph) The impact point was chosen to increase the chances of occupant ride down accelerations and head slap when impacting test article The barrier contained and redirected the 11 00C test vehicle The vehicle did not underride override or penetrate the installation Veh icle deformations exit trajectory ride down accelerations occupant impact velocities were acceptable in accordance with MASH 2016 criteria The maximum roll of the vehicle was recorded as -92 degrees during the impact maximum pitch was -193 degrees The maximum working width of the system was recorded as 142 m (465) measured from the impact face of the test article Crash test report 13578001 is attached for this test

PASS

3-11 (2270P)

The test vehicle impacted the test installation 1340 mm (5275) upstream from concrete barrier segment joint SB and 6A at an angle of 251 degrees and a velocity of 980 kmh(609 mph) The impact point was chosen to load the joint connection and increase the chances of test vehicle roll over when impacting test article The barrier contained and redirected the 2270P test veh icle The vehicle did not underride override or penetrate the installation Vehicle deformations exit trajectory ride down accelerations occupant impact velocities were acceptable in accordance with MASH 2016 criteria The maximum roll of the vehicle was recorded as -191 degrees during the impact with the maximum pitch of the vehicle being - 135 degrees The maximum working width of the system was recorded as 220 m (721 ft ) measured from the impact face of the test article The maximum dynamic deflection of the system was recorded as 160 m (524)

Crash test report 13578001 is attached for this test

PASS

3-20 (11 00C) Non-Relevant Test not conducted

3-21 (2270P) Non-Relevant Test not conducted

Version 100 (0516) Page 4 of 4

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test

laboratory (cite the laboratorys accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports)

Laboratory Name Holmes Solutions LP

Laboratory Signature Digitally signed by Emerson Ryder Emerson Ryder Date 20180704 120523 +1200

Address 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Same as Submitter D Country New Zealand Same as Submitter D Accreditation Certificate

Number and Dates of current Accreditation period

ISO IEc 1 70252005IANZ Certificate Numberl 022 23 July 2009 to Present Day

D191 tally signed by Chns Reese

Submitter SignaturemiddotChrmiddots Reese DNrna(hn ReeeoaEmiddotSeto bull ema1lacreeseeametcom caUS

Date 201807 06 145403 -0400

Submit Form

ATTACHMENTS Attach to this form

1) Additional disclosures ofrelated financial interest as indicated above

2) A copy of the full test report video and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in

support of this request

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards] For proprietary products a single isometric line drawing is

usually acceptable to illustrate the product with detailed specifications intended use and contact

information provided on the reverse Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted

to facilitate our review

FHWA Official Business Only

Eligibility Letter

Number Date Key Words

Version 100 (0516) Page 1 of 4

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility of Highway Safety Hardware

Date of Request July 09 2018 I (e New ( Resubmission

Name Chris Reese cu +-~ E 0 II)

Company

Address

Country

Easi-Set Worldwide

5119 Catlett Road PO Box 400 Midland VA 22728

USA

To Michael S Griffith Director FHWA Office of Safety Technologies

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program

Device ampTesting Criterion - Enter from right to left starting with Test Level I - - I System Type Submission Type Device Name Variant Testing Criterion

Test Level

B Rigid Semi-Rigid Barriers (Roadside Median Bridge Railinqs)

(e Physical Crash Testing

( Engineering Analysis

12 J-J Hooks free Standing 19-8 1 4ft Barrier

AASHTO MASH TL3

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration I certify

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety

Hardware and that the evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH

Individual or Organization responsible for the product

Contact Name Chris Reese Same as Submitter [8J

Company Name Easi-Set Worldwide Same as Submitter [8J

Address 5119 Catlett Road PO Box 400 Midland VA 22728 Same as Submitter [8J

Country USA Same as Submitter [8J Enter below all disclosures of financial interests as required by the FHWA Federal-Aid Reimbursement

Eligibility Process for Safety Hardware Devices document

Holmes Solutions LP was contracted by Easi-Set Worldwide to perform full-scale crash testing on the J-J Hooks Free Standing 19-8 1 4 ft MASH Barrier with 12 connector plate There are no shared financial interests in the J-J Hooks Free Standing 19-8 1 4 ft MASH Barrier with 12 connector plate by Holmes Solutions LP or between Eas i-Set Worldwide and Holmes Solutions LP other than the costs involved in the actual crash tests and reports for this submission to FHWA

Version 100 (0516) Page 2 of 4

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

(e New Hardware or ( Modification to bull Significant Modification Existing Hardware

The J-J Hooks F shape free standing barrier system used in this test series consists of 11 barrier lengths of 6000 mm (19-8 frac14ft ) Long utilizing reinforcing bars connecting the proprietary connector plates at each end The barrier system was placed on asphalt concrete along its length The barrier system is connected together via proprietary with 12 connector plate connector plates The connector plates were installed with an approximate 160 mm overlap between adjacent connector plates along the length of the entire barrier installation This equates to an approximate 28 mm (1 1 ) gap between adjacent concrete barrier faces Barrier width measures 606 mm (238) x 8100 mm (31 8) high In the bottom center section of the barrier there is a drain hole for water relief Located on both faces of the barrier at the top of the sloped face are six M16 ferrules used to attach anti-gawk screens if required No gawk screens were fitted for this testing programme At the top of the barrier there are two 5 tonne anchors used for lifting and handling The overall barrier installation length was approximately 660 m and total weight of each barrier is approximately 43 Tonnes

CRASH TESTING

By signature below the Engineer affiliated with the testing laboratory agrees in support of this submission that all of the critical and relevant crash tests for this device listed above were conducted to meet the MASH test criteria The Engineer has determined that no other crash tests are necessary to determine the device meets the MASH criteria

Engineer Name Emerson Ryder

Digitally signed by Emerson Ryder Engineer Signature Emerson Ryder Date 20180704 11 5914 +1200

Address 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Same as Submitter D Country New Zealand Same as Submitter D A brief description of each crash test and its result

Version 100 (0516) Page 3 of 4

Required Test Number

Narrative Description

Evaluation Results

3-10 (11 0OC)

The test vehicle impacted the test installation 1050 mm (413) upstream from concrete barrier segment joint SB and 6A at an angle of 251 degrees and a velocity of 980 kmh(609 mph) The impact point was chosen to increase the chances of occupant ride down accelerations and head slap when impacting test article The barrier contained and redirected the 11 00C test vehicle The vehicle did not underride override or penetrate the installation Veh icle deformations exit trajectory ride down accelerations occupant impact velocities were acceptable in accordance with MASH 2016 criteria The maximum roll of the vehicle was recorded as -92 degrees during the impact maximum pitch was -193 degrees The maximum working width of the system was recorded as 142 m (465) measured from the impact face of the test article Crash test report 13578001 is attached for this test

PASS

3-11 (2270P)

The test vehicle impacted the test installation 1340 mm (5275) upstream from concrete barrier segment joint SB and 6A at an angle of 251 degrees and a velocity of 980 kmh(609 mph) The impact point was chosen to load the joint connection and increase the chances of test vehicle roll over when impacting test article The barrier contained and redirected the 2270P test veh icle The vehicle did not underride override or penetrate the installation Vehicle deformations exit trajectory ride down accelerations occupant impact velocities were acceptable in accordance with MASH 2016 criteria The maximum roll of the vehicle was recorded as -191 degrees during the impact with the maximum pitch of the vehicle being - 135 degrees The maximum working width of the system was recorded as 220 m (721 ft ) measured from the impact face of the test article The maximum dynamic deflection of the system was recorded as 160 m (524)

Crash test report 13578001 is attached for this test

PASS

3-20 (11 00C) Non-Relevant Test not conducted

3-21 (2270P) Non-Relevant Test not conducted

Version 100 (0516) Page 4 of 4

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test

laboratory (cite the laboratorys accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports)

Laboratory Name Holmes Solutions LP

Laboratory Signature Digitally signed by Emerson Ryder Emerson Ryder Date 20180704 120523 +1200

Address 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Same as Submitter D Country New Zealand Same as Submitter D Accreditation Certificate

Number and Dates of current Accreditation period

ISO IEc 1 70252005IANZ Certificate Numberl 022 23 July 2009 to Present Day

D191 tally signed by Chns Reese

Submitter SignaturemiddotChrmiddots Reese DNrna(hn ReeeoaEmiddotSeto bull ema1lacreeseeametcom caUS

Date 201807 06 145403 -0400

Submit Form

ATTACHMENTS Attach to this form

1) Additional disclosures ofrelated financial interest as indicated above

2) A copy of the full test report video and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in

support of this request

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards] For proprietary products a single isometric line drawing is

usually acceptable to illustrate the product with detailed specifications intended use and contact

information provided on the reverse Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted

to facilitate our review

FHWA Official Business Only

Eligibility Letter

Number Date Key Words

Version 100 (0516) Page 2 of 4

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

(e New Hardware or ( Modification to bull Significant Modification Existing Hardware

The J-J Hooks F shape free standing barrier system used in this test series consists of 11 barrier lengths of 6000 mm (19-8 frac14ft ) Long utilizing reinforcing bars connecting the proprietary connector plates at each end The barrier system was placed on asphalt concrete along its length The barrier system is connected together via proprietary with 12 connector plate connector plates The connector plates were installed with an approximate 160 mm overlap between adjacent connector plates along the length of the entire barrier installation This equates to an approximate 28 mm (1 1 ) gap between adjacent concrete barrier faces Barrier width measures 606 mm (238) x 8100 mm (31 8) high In the bottom center section of the barrier there is a drain hole for water relief Located on both faces of the barrier at the top of the sloped face are six M16 ferrules used to attach anti-gawk screens if required No gawk screens were fitted for this testing programme At the top of the barrier there are two 5 tonne anchors used for lifting and handling The overall barrier installation length was approximately 660 m and total weight of each barrier is approximately 43 Tonnes

CRASH TESTING

By signature below the Engineer affiliated with the testing laboratory agrees in support of this submission that all of the critical and relevant crash tests for this device listed above were conducted to meet the MASH test criteria The Engineer has determined that no other crash tests are necessary to determine the device meets the MASH criteria

Engineer Name Emerson Ryder

Digitally signed by Emerson Ryder Engineer Signature Emerson Ryder Date 20180704 11 5914 +1200

Address 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Same as Submitter D Country New Zealand Same as Submitter D A brief description of each crash test and its result

Version 100 (0516) Page 3 of 4

Required Test Number

Narrative Description

Evaluation Results

3-10 (11 0OC)

The test vehicle impacted the test installation 1050 mm (413) upstream from concrete barrier segment joint SB and 6A at an angle of 251 degrees and a velocity of 980 kmh(609 mph) The impact point was chosen to increase the chances of occupant ride down accelerations and head slap when impacting test article The barrier contained and redirected the 11 00C test vehicle The vehicle did not underride override or penetrate the installation Veh icle deformations exit trajectory ride down accelerations occupant impact velocities were acceptable in accordance with MASH 2016 criteria The maximum roll of the vehicle was recorded as -92 degrees during the impact maximum pitch was -193 degrees The maximum working width of the system was recorded as 142 m (465) measured from the impact face of the test article Crash test report 13578001 is attached for this test

PASS

3-11 (2270P)

The test vehicle impacted the test installation 1340 mm (5275) upstream from concrete barrier segment joint SB and 6A at an angle of 251 degrees and a velocity of 980 kmh(609 mph) The impact point was chosen to load the joint connection and increase the chances of test vehicle roll over when impacting test article The barrier contained and redirected the 2270P test veh icle The vehicle did not underride override or penetrate the installation Vehicle deformations exit trajectory ride down accelerations occupant impact velocities were acceptable in accordance with MASH 2016 criteria The maximum roll of the vehicle was recorded as -191 degrees during the impact with the maximum pitch of the vehicle being - 135 degrees The maximum working width of the system was recorded as 220 m (721 ft ) measured from the impact face of the test article The maximum dynamic deflection of the system was recorded as 160 m (524)

Crash test report 13578001 is attached for this test

PASS

3-20 (11 00C) Non-Relevant Test not conducted

3-21 (2270P) Non-Relevant Test not conducted

Version 100 (0516) Page 4 of 4

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test

laboratory (cite the laboratorys accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports)

Laboratory Name Holmes Solutions LP

Laboratory Signature Digitally signed by Emerson Ryder Emerson Ryder Date 20180704 120523 +1200

Address 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Same as Submitter D Country New Zealand Same as Submitter D Accreditation Certificate

Number and Dates of current Accreditation period

ISO IEc 1 70252005IANZ Certificate Numberl 022 23 July 2009 to Present Day

D191 tally signed by Chns Reese

Submitter SignaturemiddotChrmiddots Reese DNrna(hn ReeeoaEmiddotSeto bull ema1lacreeseeametcom caUS

Date 201807 06 145403 -0400

Submit Form

ATTACHMENTS Attach to this form

1) Additional disclosures ofrelated financial interest as indicated above

2) A copy of the full test report video and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in

support of this request

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards] For proprietary products a single isometric line drawing is

usually acceptable to illustrate the product with detailed specifications intended use and contact

information provided on the reverse Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted

to facilitate our review

FHWA Official Business Only

Eligibility Letter

Number Date Key Words

Version 100 (0516) Page 3 of 4

Required Test Number

Narrative Description

Evaluation Results

3-10 (11 0OC)

The test vehicle impacted the test installation 1050 mm (413) upstream from concrete barrier segment joint SB and 6A at an angle of 251 degrees and a velocity of 980 kmh(609 mph) The impact point was chosen to increase the chances of occupant ride down accelerations and head slap when impacting test article The barrier contained and redirected the 11 00C test vehicle The vehicle did not underride override or penetrate the installation Veh icle deformations exit trajectory ride down accelerations occupant impact velocities were acceptable in accordance with MASH 2016 criteria The maximum roll of the vehicle was recorded as -92 degrees during the impact maximum pitch was -193 degrees The maximum working width of the system was recorded as 142 m (465) measured from the impact face of the test article Crash test report 13578001 is attached for this test

PASS

3-11 (2270P)

The test vehicle impacted the test installation 1340 mm (5275) upstream from concrete barrier segment joint SB and 6A at an angle of 251 degrees and a velocity of 980 kmh(609 mph) The impact point was chosen to load the joint connection and increase the chances of test vehicle roll over when impacting test article The barrier contained and redirected the 2270P test veh icle The vehicle did not underride override or penetrate the installation Vehicle deformations exit trajectory ride down accelerations occupant impact velocities were acceptable in accordance with MASH 2016 criteria The maximum roll of the vehicle was recorded as -191 degrees during the impact with the maximum pitch of the vehicle being - 135 degrees The maximum working width of the system was recorded as 220 m (721 ft ) measured from the impact face of the test article The maximum dynamic deflection of the system was recorded as 160 m (524)

Crash test report 13578001 is attached for this test

PASS

3-20 (11 00C) Non-Relevant Test not conducted

3-21 (2270P) Non-Relevant Test not conducted

Version 100 (0516) Page 4 of 4

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test

laboratory (cite the laboratorys accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports)

Laboratory Name Holmes Solutions LP

Laboratory Signature Digitally signed by Emerson Ryder Emerson Ryder Date 20180704 120523 +1200

Address 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Same as Submitter D Country New Zealand Same as Submitter D Accreditation Certificate

Number and Dates of current Accreditation period

ISO IEc 1 70252005IANZ Certificate Numberl 022 23 July 2009 to Present Day

D191 tally signed by Chns Reese

Submitter SignaturemiddotChrmiddots Reese DNrna(hn ReeeoaEmiddotSeto bull ema1lacreeseeametcom caUS

Date 201807 06 145403 -0400

Submit Form

ATTACHMENTS Attach to this form

1) Additional disclosures ofrelated financial interest as indicated above

2) A copy of the full test report video and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in

support of this request

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards] For proprietary products a single isometric line drawing is

usually acceptable to illustrate the product with detailed specifications intended use and contact

information provided on the reverse Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted

to facilitate our review

FHWA Official Business Only

Eligibility Letter

Number Date Key Words

Version 100 (0516) Page 4 of 4

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the following accredited crash test

laboratory (cite the laboratorys accreditation status as noted in the crash test reports)

Laboratory Name Holmes Solutions LP

Laboratory Signature Digitally signed by Emerson Ryder Emerson Ryder Date 20180704 120523 +1200

Address 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Same as Submitter D Country New Zealand Same as Submitter D Accreditation Certificate

Number and Dates of current Accreditation period

ISO IEc 1 70252005IANZ Certificate Numberl 022 23 July 2009 to Present Day

D191 tally signed by Chns Reese

Submitter SignaturemiddotChrmiddots Reese DNrna(hn ReeeoaEmiddotSeto bull ema1lacreeseeametcom caUS

Date 201807 06 145403 -0400

Submit Form

ATTACHMENTS Attach to this form

1) Additional disclosures ofrelated financial interest as indicated above

2) A copy of the full test report video and a Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in

support of this request

3) A drawing or drawings of the device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards] For proprietary products a single isometric line drawing is

usually acceptable to illustrate the product with detailed specifications intended use and contact

information provided on the reverse Additional drawings (not in TF-13 format) showing details that

are relevant to understanding the dimensions and performance of the device should also be submitted

to facilitate our review

FHWA Official Business Only

Eligibility Letter

Number Date Key Words

65 4 m From CIP

----------

EXIT BOX

Easi-Set J-J Hooks 19-8 1ft ConcreteTest Article Post Impact Vehicle Behaviour Barrier Mash 3-10

Goad660 mTotal lenQth 654 m (2145 ft Ke11 Elements - Barrier 12 connector plate NoneDescription Tempararti Concrete Barrier Stistem NoneLength of Barrier Installation 660 m length of need

Occupant Impact Velocit11 (mis) 00890 seconds left side of interiorBarrier Height 081 m (265 ft) Barrier Lenqth 60 m (19-8 1ft Longitudinal 44

Lateral [ optional -75 Test Vehicle Occupant Ride-down DecelerationDesignation 1100C X-direction (g) -38 (05635 - 05735 seconds) MakeModel Nissan Tiida Y-direction (g) 83 (02037 - 02137 seconds) Dimensions mm (inches) (LxWxH) 4230 (1673)L x 1695 (66)W x 1530 (602)H

Curb Wt 11125 kg (24526 lbs) THIV (optional) (mis) 93 PHO (optional) (g) 91 (02037 - 02137 seconds) Test Inertial Wt 10920 kg (24074 lbs) ASI [optional 185 [00249 - 00749 seconds Grass Static 11670 kq (25728 lbs Test Article Damaiie ModerateImpact Conditions

Speed 980 kmh (609 mph) Test Article Deflections Dtinamic 082 m (269 ft )Angle 251 degrees Permanent 082 m (269 ft) Impact Point 1050 mm [413) Upstream of Joint 58 and 6A Warkinq Width 142 m [465 ftExit Conditions

Exit Speed 65 kmh Est (404 mph) Vehicle Damage Exterior VDS 11FL-3 Exit Anq le 70deg Est CDC 11LFEE3Test Number 1357803-10 Maximum Deformation 110 mm [43Test Date 1st Ma11 2018

Vehicle Pocketin

13578001RP0818 (v1 3) docx IANZACCREDtTE D UampORATOltY Page 20 of 66

jl()(llll_Otlampro-deg~

000 s 1 011 s 1 022 s I o33 s o 44 s

5 2 4 m From CIP

Test Article Easi-Set J -J Hooks 19-8 1ft Concrete Post Impact Vehicle Behaviour Barrier Mash 3-11 660 m Below Average Total lenQth

524 m (1719 ftKey Elements - Barrier 12 connector plate Description Temporarti Concrete Barrier Stistem None Length of Barrier Installation 660 m length of need None Rail Height 081 m (265 ft) Occupant Impact Velocity (mis) 01033 seconds left side of interior Post Spacin 60 m (19-8 1bull ft Longitudinal 39 Test Vehicle Lateral (optional -66 Designation 2270P Occupant Ride-down Deceleration MakeModel Dodge Ram 1500 Quad Cab X-direction (g) -34 (01033 - 01133 seconds)

Y-direction (g) 107 (02363 - 02463 seconds) Dimensions mm (inches) (LxWxH) 5790 (228) X 2030 (799) X 1890 (744) Curb Wt 2179 kg (4803 lbs) THIV (optional) (ms) 84 Test Inertial Wt 2300 kg (5070 lbs) PHD (optional) (g) 108 (02363 - 02463 seconds) Gross Static 2300 ka (5070 lbs ASI (optional 148 (00247 - 00747 seconds Impact Conditions Test Article Damaiie Moderate Speed 990 kmh (615 mph) Test Article Deflections Angle 247 degrees Dtinamic 160 m (524 ft) Impact Point 1340 mm (5271 Upstream barrier 58 and 6A Permanent 160 m (524 ft)

Workina Width 220 m (721 ft ] Exit Conditions Exit Speed 65 kmh est (4038 mph) Vehicle Damage Exterior Exit Ana le 15deg VOS 11FL-3 Test Number 1357803-11 CDC 11LFEE3 Test Date 30 April 2018 Maximum Deformation 195 mm (767

-------

------------ - ____ _

EXIT BOX _____

Vehicle Pocketin

13 578001 RP0818(v1 3)docx ~ IANZ~~I Att~JE~~~lORY Page 30 of 66

1

shy

~-fE

[___ ~ --~ J

MINMUM SUNG ANGlE bull 60deg

f ~~

6mm lf 13116

SECTION

END ELEVATION

4~9~frac34 115mm

gtnQ(41f2]sf ~l tgl _jl

STIRRUP

i

gtKllC 11(0RAOIIJSroir

I ----

MlBAK AHO SMAlllM IS ~bull~ 1abullIINOlMHHti

WINF Rl 718 2-1 WIDE X 19 -Aj (LONG ___ MANUFACTURE TESTING LEIEL ETC )

615mm 100mm X CROSS 160mm TO BAA CHAIR AT THE CENTRE Of THE INTERNATIONAL NOTES (AUSTRALIAN amp NEW 200mm OR EQUIVALENT ) EACH FACE BARRIER JUST BELOW THE SURFACE ___i ZEALA~ - INSTAtLAnON ROolCWE SLACK IN liCX)K ENG-GU11Nl

fPERMISSllllC TOLEIVNCEOf bullO ~11middot1 ELEVATION AT ENO tFOR INTERNATIONAL USE) CTgtNCRtcll

j 3 bullS bull 16 METRIC) ASTM Abull706 I CONCRETE amp1AU BE Nl2 CONCAETC TO AS 1379 A TRANSITION PIECE IIElWEEN A J J liOO( BARRrER AN(l

ANOT+ifR SUCCESSHJll I TES TEO COHtbullECTION IS ACCDbullTAllll

COlll( ~ -ObullIOUNlSSNO r EOOTHERMSpound 6RAOpound gtOONHQl OlLFOOHOltradet08ARSTOAS46l100I_ lAIIRIC TOAS671

7tAu~f~~ftN~ REINFORCING DETAIL REINFORCEMENT

NOHCE I HISAAOOUCTCOHT AINSlgtRoPRIETARY tA1Ut(tSW11KHAKI 1-IUlt(ltll HY OH OH ll()Ht

SPACING IA111NAS EOUAIUHIESSNO I EO ontERWISE US PATENTS 5 BARS MlH BENDS StiAIL 11VE A 4 PIN DIA UNLESS NOICO

ALLATION NOTE OIHERWISE DEFLECTIONS

0poundSIGNCRIIERIA fgt gtAI-EIYBAllRlfR10Sffli1~ S TAHCOEFlECtlOH~shy

l r OYN-MICDHLlCIONamp-7 NOlRP3SOlESILEVElltllbullll(38mm)2X2X316ANG~E

2X2 X 316 ANGLE

- j5 1 1t51x5mm) J

51x51 laquo Smni ~ QTY MATERIA=-sect_LISfllf71NGANOHANOLING VERTICALROTATION 8 CONCRETE STRENGTH AT TM Of LIFTING Sl-tAll BC io MP1

MINIMUM VERT10Al CURVE 3 middot IIgt (1116 1ETRIC) ASTM Abull706 MAXIMUM SEPARATION M+NlttUM 12 t~t~~c~~~~-Abull706M GRADE 60 BARS

i llF ING AHC-S SHALL 8pound llHCON ANCHORS 5 TONNE bull 240 n (21 lbulltbulli 111~WWfRl71ll lONG LONG OR EOUNALENT 611nGl tOOnomCROSS1110rnrn0

200mm10REOUIIALCNTPOSITIVE CONNECTOR

10 IOUJttE Of (ACH U- I 7~

t-4k3~

3-115 11 16 METRIC)ASTMA-706 CONCRETE CY J 1111 MA$$ 0( UCH UNIT bull JO TONNES BASED ON 2bull50 iimbull 12 AUDIMENSl()NSgtNINMIUIIETRES

(A-706M) GRADE 60 BARS WEIGHT 160185

2 X 2 X 3116 AN GltE I kh1gt1

p~ =- ---c bullbullbullbull -r--~~j APPROVED PLANT--b-----11-- - HHVERTICAL ROTATION HORIZONTAL ROTATION CLOSED POSITION MIN IMUM VERTICAL MINIMUM HORIZONTAL RADIUS = 164(20)

IJHlWN Bl Hl(K[O 81 _~CCPtACgttT ec 2019 EA9 U ~ AU RICgttlS ~ ~~k~T~~141~~ ~ifios~JEO~bull~Tpound~~~~~s ~~~ ~lmiddot~r ns ~ MS OT COSllll11( t~S -----

1~ GENERAL NOTES ANO SPECIFICATIONS

---------------- ~~ CONCRETE C-SS M CONCREIC 4000 lSl iM MfgtbullI ~ hllNIMUM C()MPR[SSIVE STRENCTH N 11 OAYS

~ ) (pound)

i~ r

~IN(~~imiddoti~ni~=~~~~E=IEO

slr~~~l~OSILH1I __ _ 1500mm 1 f4 -11 11167(TY~- ALL REINFORCING STEEL WILL SE QRAOE IIO IJNESS

PLAN M1 6 FE RRULES OTtiERWISE SltClfEO ALL WELDED RtcllAH IS MilMA706ii BOTH SIOES(FOR v~ ~~~1pound~~~~~~~~5 ~G

INTERNATIONAL USE) TO SEC~E CA0E IN FORM amp ltANOIING-$ NEEDED

RESARlMiYBCUSCDASNtOPTIONTOWELOCOWIRE~~~------- ~ -------~1-~~aa--------1~ fABRIC 11[8AR T08C~ 60

UfllNO ~ICfS ANO LOCATIONS WILL ARY 8Y MANl)fACHJRlllaquoSUIE001

~bullER SHOWN IS DEi AiLED USiNG ltll METRIC SYSEM NOMINAi OIMENSIOHS SttOWH INOICA TE THE IMPERIAL SYS TEM USEOIH ltIE UNl1pound0S1AllS OIM~NSIONAI VARIANCl WL occ~ tROM TH[ Ml RIC to IMP[RW SYSTEM

STEEL ASTM A-l6 tA36M) MIHIIIUM 1PIAN -11L FINISH Of l l()NAl OALIANIZlOJ-JHOQOSASR~OUKUD

WELDING AWS 0 1 I smucruRAL MLDING COOCmiddotSTEEl AWS 01 ~ STRUCTURALWELDING

150mm COOlbullREINfORCINGbull Sl[lL-~_J I --r~l----- 12-7 IT) 15718---i TOlERANCES

6000mm CONNECTOR LOCATIONbullbull 1middot16middot 11 IIMto119-8 l-1 (20 NOMtNAL) CONNECTORPIATtcSIZE bull 111()2IUI

ELEVATION ~~=bulllil~~t~~~6- t

DESIGNPAASl-lll31100mm lt500mm-_----- 1500mm 11oomm 400mm JJliOO(StSACAASh TESTEONlaquogtOPEAATI0NAIOESIGN

2 FOR USE OH All Fpound0ERAI--AIO 1-tlGHWAYPHOJpoundC t S

AHACHlOENTIFICATION TRANSPONDER

-14 REBARl APPtlCAampC SHAPES f SHAPE JCRSCI SHAPC ANO CONSTANT SloPE

[3 7 51161 ~ N [4 11 11167 ~h 1----rmiddot1 11116---- ~bull1511smiddot1 -p----JJWJ __APPIICAampE ~HIEH LENGTHS 11-0 TO 20 O (2431 MM 10

DRAINAGE St0l$Wlll AfY IN SIZE ANO LOCATION DEPENDING ON S TATE DOT STAN DAROS

RL 118 EACH FACE IIAARIER MARKING AS R(QUIREOElI SlAll 001 SlANOAROsco MAHUflCTUH[RSIO OAl[Of

H+-----------=---1 ~~~=~ ~g middot=li~~~~lCJlN(

13578001 RP0818 ( vt3)docxIANZ ACC~1c~~~O~TORY Pa ge 8 of 66

shy

~-fE

[___ ~ --~ J

MINMUM SUNG ANGlE bull 60deg

f ~~

6mm lf 13116

SECTION

END ELEVATION

4~9~frac34 115mm

gtnQ(41f2]sf ~l tgl _jl

STIRRUP

i

gtKllC 11(0RAOIIJSroir

I ----

MlBAK AHO SMAlllM IS ~bull~ 1abullIINOlMHHti

WINF Rl 718 2-1 WIDE X 19 -Aj (LONG ___ MANUFACTURE TESTING LEIEL ETC )

615mm 100mm X CROSS 160mm TO BAA CHAIR AT THE CENTRE Of THE INTERNATIONAL NOTES (AUSTRALIAN amp NEW 200mm OR EQUIVALENT ) EACH FACE BARRIER JUST BELOW THE SURFACE ___i ZEALA~ - INSTAtLAnON ROolCWE SLACK IN liCX)K ENG-GU11Nl

fPERMISSllllC TOLEIVNCEOf bullO ~11middot1 ELEVATION AT ENO tFOR INTERNATIONAL USE) CTgtNCRtcll

j 3 bullS bull 16 METRIC) ASTM Abull706 I CONCRETE amp1AU BE Nl2 CONCAETC TO AS 1379 A TRANSITION PIECE IIElWEEN A J J liOO( BARRrER AN(l

ANOT+ifR SUCCESSHJll I TES TEO COHtbullECTION IS ACCDbullTAllll

COlll( ~ -ObullIOUNlSSNO r EOOTHERMSpound 6RAOpound gtOONHQl OlLFOOHOltradet08ARSTOAS46l100I_ lAIIRIC TOAS671

7tAu~f~~ftN~ REINFORCING DETAIL REINFORCEMENT

NOHCE I HISAAOOUCTCOHT AINSlgtRoPRIETARY tA1Ut(tSW11KHAKI 1-IUlt(ltll HY OH OH ll()Ht

SPACING IA111NAS EOUAIUHIESSNO I EO ontERWISE US PATENTS 5 BARS MlH BENDS StiAIL 11VE A 4 PIN DIA UNLESS NOICO

ALLATION NOTE OIHERWISE DEFLECTIONS

0poundSIGNCRIIERIA fgt gtAI-EIYBAllRlfR10Sffli1~ S TAHCOEFlECtlOH~shy

l r OYN-MICDHLlCIONamp-7 NOlRP3SOlESILEVElltllbullll(38mm)2X2X316ANG~E

2X2 X 316 ANGLE

- j5 1 1t51x5mm) J

51x51 laquo Smni ~ QTY MATERIA=-sect_LISfllf71NGANOHANOLING VERTICALROTATION 8 CONCRETE STRENGTH AT TM Of LIFTING Sl-tAll BC io MP1

MINIMUM VERT10Al CURVE 3 middot IIgt (1116 1ETRIC) ASTM Abull706 MAXIMUM SEPARATION M+NlttUM 12 t~t~~c~~~~-Abull706M GRADE 60 BARS

i llF ING AHC-S SHALL 8pound llHCON ANCHORS 5 TONNE bull 240 n (21 lbulltbulli 111~WWfRl71ll lONG LONG OR EOUNALENT 611nGl tOOnomCROSS1110rnrn0

200mm10REOUIIALCNTPOSITIVE CONNECTOR

10 IOUJttE Of (ACH U- I 7~

t-4k3~

3-115 11 16 METRIC)ASTMA-706 CONCRETE CY J 1111 MA$$ 0( UCH UNIT bull JO TONNES BASED ON 2bull50 iimbull 12 AUDIMENSl()NSgtNINMIUIIETRES

(A-706M) GRADE 60 BARS WEIGHT 160185

2 X 2 X 3116 AN GltE I kh1gt1

p~ =- ---c bullbullbullbull -r--~~j APPROVED PLANT--b-----11-- - HHVERTICAL ROTATION HORIZONTAL ROTATION CLOSED POSITION MIN IMUM VERTICAL MINIMUM HORIZONTAL RADIUS = 164(20)

IJHlWN Bl Hl(K[O 81 _~CCPtACgttT ec 2019 EA9 U ~ AU RICgttlS ~ ~~k~T~~141~~ ~ifios~JEO~bull~Tpound~~~~~s ~~~ ~lmiddot~r ns ~ MS OT COSllll11( t~S -----

1~ GENERAL NOTES ANO SPECIFICATIONS

---------------- ~~ CONCRETE C-SS M CONCREIC 4000 lSl iM MfgtbullI ~ hllNIMUM C()MPR[SSIVE STRENCTH N 11 OAYS

~ ) (pound)

i~ r

~IN(~~imiddoti~ni~=~~~~E=IEO

slr~~~l~OSILH1I __ _ 1500mm 1 f4 -11 11167(TY~- ALL REINFORCING STEEL WILL SE QRAOE IIO IJNESS

PLAN M1 6 FE RRULES OTtiERWISE SltClfEO ALL WELDED RtcllAH IS MilMA706ii BOTH SIOES(FOR v~ ~~~1pound~~~~~~~~5 ~G

INTERNATIONAL USE) TO SEC~E CA0E IN FORM amp ltANOIING-$ NEEDED

RESARlMiYBCUSCDASNtOPTIONTOWELOCOWIRE~~~------- ~ -------~1-~~aa--------1~ fABRIC 11[8AR T08C~ 60

UfllNO ~ICfS ANO LOCATIONS WILL ARY 8Y MANl)fACHJRlllaquoSUIE001

~bullER SHOWN IS DEi AiLED USiNG ltll METRIC SYSEM NOMINAi OIMENSIOHS SttOWH INOICA TE THE IMPERIAL SYS TEM USEOIH ltIE UNl1pound0S1AllS OIM~NSIONAI VARIANCl WL occ~ tROM TH[ Ml RIC to IMP[RW SYSTEM

STEEL ASTM A-l6 tA36M) MIHIIIUM 1PIAN -11L FINISH Of l l()NAl OALIANIZlOJ-JHOQOSASR~OUKUD

WELDING AWS 0 1 I smucruRAL MLDING COOCmiddotSTEEl AWS 01 ~ STRUCTURALWELDING

150mm COOlbullREINfORCINGbull Sl[lL-~_J I --r~l----- 12-7 IT) 15718---i TOlERANCES

6000mm CONNECTOR LOCATIONbullbull 1middot16middot 11 IIMto119-8 l-1 (20 NOMtNAL) CONNECTORPIATtcSIZE bull 111()2IUI

ELEVATION ~~=bulllil~~t~~~6- t

DESIGNPAASl-lll31100mm lt500mm-_----- 1500mm 11oomm 400mm JJliOO(StSACAASh TESTEONlaquogtOPEAATI0NAIOESIGN

2 FOR USE OH All Fpound0ERAI--AIO 1-tlGHWAYPHOJpoundC t S

AHACHlOENTIFICATION TRANSPONDER

-14 REBARl APPtlCAampC SHAPES f SHAPE JCRSCI SHAPC ANO CONSTANT SloPE

[3 7 51161 ~ N [4 11 11167 ~h 1----rmiddot1 11116---- ~bull1511smiddot1 -p----JJWJ __APPIICAampE ~HIEH LENGTHS 11-0 TO 20 O (2431 MM 10

DRAINAGE St0l$Wlll AfY IN SIZE ANO LOCATION DEPENDING ON S TATE DOT STAN DAROS

RL 118 EACH FACE IIAARIER MARKING AS R(QUIREOElI SlAll 001 SlANOAROsco MAHUflCTUH[RSIO OAl[Of

H+-----------=---1 ~~~=~ ~g middot=li~~~~lCJlN(

13578001 RP0818 ( vt3)docxIANZ ACC~1c~~~O~TORY Pa ge 8 of 66

middot ~

t ridL rbulll middot- I 1 le I 1500mo

~-I l _ PLAN

~ ~~ I mm -- deg so~~bull~~~i[ middot- J 11~~ii If1TTN1llfill Ibull~ Y 61 INTERNATIONAL USE I [9-4316middot middotmiddot1 ~ ---9 ~ 200mm

MINIMUM SLING ANGLE 60deg

Ell

~~

_J ~l~ -----cl~ [2-71121

1w- 11bull1120 NonwlaJ

ELEVATION

ltOOmm )1 00J 150ltmm oomm 41)0

4~ ~~1gt 15mm

ffjJ STIRRUP

NOTE 11euroN0~1gtFORbull~ RtBAR-NOSMlil[RIS~~ lq_bullIINIOIAlllffEIJ PLATES 675mm100mmXCR0S$760mm

200mm OR EQUIVALENT ) EACH FACE t CONNECTOR PlAre (10mm ASTM A-36

l middotmiddot~_-~--

~1pound QTY MATERIALS LIST

(21 t~~~~~~~~SWII~ 2 lll19~WMRl8LONGi CONNECTOR PtATE Note Rebar Placement bull 1SWO 100mm CROSS_NOWELDii~ (10mm) Elr 11 1middot ozoon-10REOU1VMENT1

tll a5R(lAA18_J

j5gt MR(BARSTIRRUP$3- JJ5 ( 16 MElRIC ASTM A-706 (A-706M) FrCONNECTOR ANGLE GRADE 60 BARS (GR -420 metric) CONCRtTfCI 2 362 bull2bull316 g~ WEICtH 9S60LBS51x51a5rnm

2 I 316 ( E~o TACK EA END 311 T 6 2 bull= 50mm

6mm 38mm

-~12 1poundTACK (TOP amp BOTTOM TYPJ 6mm 38mm

ltXPlRKgtIT O 201 6 EA9 ~~AU RIGiTS ~ - ~9~~[1~~s~(~~~~Dil~HOPl(D~~J(~middot~~~~-s~~li~~g 114S ~-- DlaquoS gt101 0WSTITllll ~ [~

1bullmiddot-11111amp7

SN12 ~l-4REBARJ

----middot

(315 (18 METRIC) X 18-4J 5TM A6l5

TO J-HOOK CONNECTOR WltF RL7 18 2- 1 WIDE X l9 Jbull (LONG

(117-4 51161

(4-1 1 11161 3~middots--- r1 middot-J 3141

RL 71 8 EACH FACE

ATTACH IOENTIF1CATION TRANSPONOER

j bull~ j~~~~~L~~~~~~~~~REBAR

2 bull 2 _ 3116 CONNECTOR ANGLE ASTM A-36 SI

c 13578001RP0818(v13)docx

~ shy IANZ~ ACC~ E~O~ TORY Page 9 of 66